| *** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 05:18 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has joined #storyboard | 05:19 | |
| *** fay has joined #storyboard | 07:22 | |
| *** fay is now known as Guest40632 | 07:22 | |
| *** Guest40632 is now known as faybrocklebank | 07:23 | |
| *** matthewbodkin has joined #storyboard | 07:54 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 08:34 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has joined #storyboard | 08:34 | |
| SotK | morning! | 08:46 |
|---|---|---|
| Zara | mrrrrrrrrrrgh | 09:17 |
| Zara | I did not sleep last night | 09:17 |
| Zara | afk for a little bit | 10:12 |
| Zara | bk | 10:46 |
| Zara | reminder: storyboard meeting at 15:00 UTC! | 11:15 |
| Zara | agenda at https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/StoryBoard#Agenda_for_next_meeting ; will update a bit | 11:16 |
| *** alexismonville has joined #storyboard | 11:28 | |
| openstackgerrit | Adam Coldrick proposed openstack-infra/storyboard-webclient: Rework the task list layout https://review.openstack.org/357306 | 11:32 |
| Zara | ooh | 11:32 |
| SotK | finally! | 11:33 |
| Zara | :) | 11:33 |
| Zara | ah, so now it's split out from 'add to worklist' things | 11:37 |
| Zara | I was going to say things about the commit message and gerrit. | 11:37 |
| pedroalvarez | I looked through the previous version, and looked good | 11:38 |
| SotK | yep, it was getting very large | 11:39 |
| Zara | yeah, I prefer it split out. | 11:39 |
| Zara | reusable tags seem fine on my test instance; could you edit the commit message so that the gerrit plugin can update the task? | 11:43 |
| Zara | ^matthewbodkin | 11:43 |
| *** alexismonville has quit IRC | 11:45 | |
| openstackgerrit | Adam Coldrick proposed openstack-infra/storyboard-webclient: Rework the task list layout https://review.openstack.org/357306 | 11:48 |
| persia | That revision is more readable, but I still wonder if it ought depend on API changes to separate notes from review URL and wonder why "Priority=medium" seems hardcoded. | 11:50 |
| SotK | "Priority=medium" is the starting default, and will disappear when the complex priority patch is put on top of it | 12:08 |
| SotK | and we can probably update the link/notes mess at a later date | 12:08 |
| openstackgerrit | Matthew Bodkin proposed openstack-infra/storyboard-webclient: Make tags reusable https://review.openstack.org/366188 | 12:33 |
| Zara | btw, saw this last night, just remembered-- a lot of handy tips in this thread: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12437527 | 12:33 |
| *** alexismonville has joined #storyboard | 12:49 | |
| Zara | my feet are different colours again. | 13:14 |
| Zara | hm, cancel button is red... | 13:41 |
| Zara | (for 'add new task'; guessing that means the 'save' and 'cancel' buttons will look the same on s.o.o) | 13:42 |
| Zara | yeah, they do (different shades of red, wah) | 13:43 |
| Zara | I don't think we should have two 'add task' buttons. | 13:44 |
| Zara | and 'Tasks' looks a bit like it's part of the story description so we should reinstate the horizontal rule | 13:47 |
| Zara | we've also lost the remove button | 13:48 |
| SotK | the remove button is still there, just not when there is only one task left in a story | 13:49 |
| persia | I think that is now called "delete" | 13:49 |
| persia | I think I like the new add task more than the old one. | 13:49 |
| SotK | re: two add task buttons, one is a shorthand to add a task in one of the existing project+branch bits, the other allows you to set the project too | 13:50 |
| SotK | I guess we can have just the second one, but I suspect that will lead to a frustrating game of "find the task I just made" for stories with many projects/tasks | 13:51 |
| Zara | okay, it's not obvious that that's the distinction atm; I just thought one task button was missing the option to map the task to a project. | 13:52 |
| Zara | and similar for the behaviour of the delete button not being obvious, though I don't think it matters if that one confuses folk | 13:53 |
| SotK | is it any more obvious on stories with tasks from multiple projects? | 13:54 |
| persia | Hm. Maybe I need a better example story. I was looking at 32. | 13:55 |
| persia | Any suggestions? | 13:55 |
| Zara | persia: 35 has one task | 13:57 |
| Zara | SotK: kind of, but it gets confusing once both dialogues are open (the 'add new task to this project') stays open by default, then there's also an 'add new task' button | 13:57 |
| Zara | and if that one is opened too, it is very crowded | 13:57 |
| persia | Looking at 31, I think it is more obvious, but also takes way too much space. | 13:57 |
| krotscheck | Change the color to mauve | 14:00 |
| persia | heh | 14:01 |
| Zara | you've given persia ideas! | 14:01 |
| persia | I wonder if it would seem less duplicative if the bottom one were renamed "affects other project" or similar? | 14:02 |
| SotK | that would make sense to me | 14:05 |
| SotK | I think that was the meaning which made me write "Add new task" on that button, which doesn't really convey that at all | 14:06 |
| persia | My first thought was "add project", but I realised that was also confusing (because one cannot add an entirely new project there) | 14:07 |
| Zara | I'd rather just have the one 'add task' button with a field to let a user specify a project, and automatically fill it with the project of the previous task. I don' tthink that's going to be more confusing than having two task-adding dialogues that can be open simultaneously. | 14:09 |
| Zara | but that's just theoretical so you might have a different idea to what I'm picturing | 14:10 |
| persia | Not allowing them to be open simultaneously is a great idea. | 14:16 |
| persia | I don't like defaulting to the previous one, mostly because that means whichever is last becomes default, which can be annoying for certain classes of projects | 14:17 |
| persia | (for example, if there are any tasks in openstack-infra/*, those always sort after openstack/*, which means that anything that needs a change to testing mechanisms automatically has the wrong default) | 14:18 |
| *** alexismonville has quit IRC | 14:20 | |
| *** SotK has quit IRC | 14:20 | |
| *** anteaya has quit IRC | 14:20 | |
| *** pedroalvarez has quit IRC | 14:20 | |
| Zara | (ohhhhh actually the big thing that's going to confuse people is that they're going to try to add a new project name instead of selecting an existing one. oh well. one thing at a time.) | 14:31 |
| *** alexismonville has joined #storyboard | 14:42 | |
| *** SotK has joined #storyboard | 14:42 | |
| *** anteaya has joined #storyboard | 14:42 | |
| *** pedroalvarez has joined #storyboard | 14:42 | |
| Zara | while you were gone, I swapped all the storyboard code for a game of snake | 14:42 |
| persia | Yeah, that's why I thought using words other than "add" would be useful. | 14:43 |
| * SotK wonders if his message was lost in the netsplit | 14:44 | |
| persia | The last I saw from you started "I think that was the meaning..." | 14:45 |
| Zara | I don't have anything after 15:06 | 14:45 |
| * SotK wonders if folk would prefer the patch to add an "add to worklist" button on its own or as part of the complex priorities patch? | 14:45 | |
| persia | Can we do three patches? | 14:45 |
| SotK | I'm not sure what you mean | 14:46 |
| Zara | if you send more than two patches a day the patchmonster will eat you unless you send this message to 6 of your friends | 14:46 |
| Zara | meeting in 10. | 14:49 |
| persia | I don't like really big patches, because it's hard for me to understand everything all at once. So, given a question of the form "should feature X be in patch A or patch B?", I tend to prefer that there are three patches. | 14:51 |
| persia | That said, maybe this isn't feasible with the current set: depending on what needs doing to make it work. | 14:51 |
| SotK | oh, then I miscommunicated my original question and you want the first option | 14:52 |
| persia | Rather, I misread: I read "the patch" as the subject, and "to add" as the verb, whereas re-reading, clearly "the patch to add an "add to worklist" button" is the object of "prefer". | 14:54 |
| persia | Apologies for failing to grammar today. | 14:54 |
| persia | Yes I prefer it on it's own :) | 14:54 |
| krotscheck | Oh my god that timeline UI is lovely | 14:55 |
| krotscheck | Who did that? | 14:55 |
| Zara | SotK! | 14:56 |
| Zara | he is amazing | 14:56 |
| SotK | that was me | 14:56 |
| Zara | and yes | 14:56 |
| Zara | it is the loveliest thing ever isn't it | 14:56 |
| krotscheck | SotK: That's brilliant. | 14:56 |
| Zara | it's the reason I'm so fussy with his patches; I HAVE BEEN SPOILED | 14:57 |
| SotK | krotscheck: thanks :) | 14:59 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack-infra/python-storyboardclient: Give user option to bypass verification https://review.openstack.org/366099 | 15:16 |
| *** matthewbodkin has quit IRC | 15:43 | |
| *** faybrocklebank has quit IRC | 15:56 | |
| *** alexismonville has quit IRC | 16:04 | |
| openstackgerrit | Adam Coldrick proposed openstack-infra/storyboard-webclient: Rework the task list layout https://review.openstack.org/357306 | 18:23 |
| openstackgerrit | Adam Coldrick proposed openstack-infra/storyboard-webclient: Add a way to add tasks to worklists from the story view https://review.openstack.org/366899 | 18:23 |
| *** alexismonville has joined #storyboard | 18:25 | |
| openstackgerrit | Adam Coldrick proposed openstack-infra/storyboard-webclient: Complex priorities UI in stories https://review.openstack.org/312666 | 18:32 |
| *** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 20:04 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has joined #storyboard | 20:04 | |
| *** alexismonville has quit IRC | 20:10 | |
| *** jmccrory has quit IRC | 21:53 | |
| *** jmccrory has joined #storyboard | 21:53 | |
| *** jmccrory has quit IRC | 21:55 | |
| *** jmccrory has joined #storyboard | 21:55 | |
| *** jmccrory has quit IRC | 21:57 | |
| *** jmccrory has joined #storyboard | 21:57 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!