*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:02 | |
*** shivharis has quit IRC | 00:03 | |
*** moha_hunt has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:03 | |
*** vjay3 has quit IRC | 00:05 | |
*** VijayB has quit IRC | 00:05 | |
*** jjmb has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:05 | |
*** stevemar2 has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:06 | |
*** natarajk has quit IRC | 00:06 | |
*** bgorski has quit IRC | 00:06 | |
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:07 | |
*** vivek-ebay has quit IRC | 00:09 | |
*** stevemar has quit IRC | 00:10 | |
*** bgorski has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:10 | |
*** zhiyan_ is now known as zhiyan | 00:10 | |
*** reed has quit IRC | 00:11 | |
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC | 00:12 | |
*** VijayB_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:13 | |
*** eankutse has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:16 | |
*** samcdona has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:17 | |
*** manishg has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:19 | |
*** nedbat_ has quit IRC | 00:19 | |
*** nedbat has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:20 | |
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC | 00:20 | |
*** yingjun has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:21 | |
*** manishg_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:21 | |
*** weshay has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:22 | |
*** vermarah__ has quit IRC | 00:22 | |
*** vermarah_ has quit IRC | 00:22 | |
*** vermarah has quit IRC | 00:22 | |
*** manishg has quit IRC | 00:23 | |
*** manishg_ is now known as manishg | 00:23 | |
*** gokrokve has quit IRC | 00:24 | |
*** eankutse has quit IRC | 00:26 | |
*** matsuhashi has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:27 | |
*** tomoe_ has quit IRC | 00:27 | |
*** eguz has quit IRC | 00:28 | |
*** yingjun has quit IRC | 00:29 | |
*** yingjun has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:29 | |
*** leeantho has quit IRC | 00:30 | |
*** jaypipes has quit IRC | 00:32 | |
*** ArxCruz_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:32 | |
*** ArxCruz has quit IRC | 00:33 | |
*** vjay3 has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:33 | |
*** novas0x2a|laptop has quit IRC | 00:34 | |
*** Kanzhe has quit IRC | 00:35 | |
*** pdehaye has quit IRC | 00:36 | |
*** chuckC has quit IRC | 00:37 | |
*** marcoemorais has quit IRC | 00:38 | |
*** marcoemorais has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:38 | |
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:41 | |
*** vjay3 has quit IRC | 00:41 | |
*** novas0x2a|laptop has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:43 | |
*** dstanek_zzz is now known as dstanek | 00:44 | |
*** yingjun has quit IRC | 00:44 | |
*** bdpayne has quit IRC | 00:44 | |
*** yingjun has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:44 | |
*** whenry has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:44 | |
*** hrybacki has quit IRC | 00:44 | |
*** nedbat has quit IRC | 00:46 | |
*** nedbat has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:46 | |
*** cjellick has quit IRC | 00:47 | |
*** cjellick has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:47 | |
*** chuckC has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:50 | |
*** nedbat has quit IRC | 00:50 | |
*** cjellick has quit IRC | 00:51 | |
*** yamahata has quit IRC | 00:52 | |
*** dstanek is now known as dstanek_zzz | 00:54 | |
*** paulbc has quit IRC | 00:54 | |
*** nedbat has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:56 | |
*** nedbat has quit IRC | 00:56 | |
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:58 | |
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC | 01:00 | |
*** Mandell has quit IRC | 01:00 | |
*** vjay3 has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:00 | |
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:01 | |
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:02 | |
*** Mandell has quit IRC | 01:03 | |
*** kayaliu_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:03 | |
*** vjay3 has quit IRC | 01:06 | |
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:06 | |
*** topol has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:07 | |
*** kayaliu_ has quit IRC | 01:07 | |
*** rm_work is now known as rm_work|away | 01:07 | |
*** tkay has quit IRC | 01:08 | |
*** kayaliu_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:09 | |
*** arnaud has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:10 | |
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:10 | |
*** mberlin has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:11 | |
*** mberlin1 has quit IRC | 01:11 | |
*** haomaiw__ has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:12 | |
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC | 01:15 | |
*** Mandell has quit IRC | 01:16 | |
*** flaviof is now known as flaviof_zzz | 01:20 | |
*** sweston has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:20 | |
*** yaguang has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:20 | |
*** ramashri has quit IRC | 01:22 | |
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:24 | |
*** caleb_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:24 | |
*** marcoemorais has quit IRC | 01:26 | |
*** devlaps has quit IRC | 01:26 | |
*** adalbas has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:27 | |
*** adalbas has quit IRC | 01:27 | |
*** vivek-ebay has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:27 | |
*** marun has quit IRC | 01:28 | |
*** shakayumi has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:30 | |
*** shakayumi has quit IRC | 01:30 | |
*** arnaud has quit IRC | 01:31 | |
*** nedbat has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:31 | |
*** nosnos has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:33 | |
*** nati_uen_ has quit IRC | 01:36 | |
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:37 | |
*** rickerc has quit IRC | 01:38 | |
*** prad has quit IRC | 01:38 | |
*** bgorski has quit IRC | 01:39 | |
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC | 01:40 | |
*** shakayumi has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:41 | |
*** shakayumi has quit IRC | 01:41 | |
*** igordcard has quit IRC | 01:41 | |
*** Daisy has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:41 | |
*** xuhanp has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:42 | |
*** dstanek_zzz is now known as dstanek | 01:44 | |
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:45 | |
*** weshay has quit IRC | 01:47 | |
*** kashyapk has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:49 | |
*** saurabhs has left #openstack-meeting | 01:50 | |
*** rickerc has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:53 | |
*** rkukura has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:53 | |
*** rkukura has left #openstack-meeting | 01:53 | |
*** neelashah has quit IRC | 01:53 | |
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:54 | |
*** dstanek is now known as dstanek_zzz | 01:54 | |
*** hs634 has left #openstack-meeting | 01:54 | |
*** kashyapk has quit IRC | 01:55 | |
*** bgorski has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:55 | |
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:56 | |
*** hrybacki has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:01 | |
*** sweston has quit IRC | 02:01 | |
*** caleb_ has quit IRC | 02:02 | |
*** caleb_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:03 | |
*** kayaliu__ has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:03 | |
*** kayaliu_ has quit IRC | 02:03 | |
*** rickerc has quit IRC | 02:07 | |
*** amcrn has quit IRC | 02:08 | |
*** vpanizo has quit IRC | 02:08 | |
*** vpanizo has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:09 | |
*** sweston has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:09 | |
*** rkukura has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:10 | |
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:10 | |
*** blogan has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:13 | |
*** mlavalle has quit IRC | 02:13 | |
*** sweston has quit IRC | 02:13 | |
*** rickerc has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:13 | |
*** vpanizo has quit IRC | 02:13 | |
*** nkubota has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:15 | |
*** gokrokve has quit IRC | 02:18 | |
*** tomoe_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:19 | |
*** reed has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:19 | |
*** sankarshan is now known as sankarshan_away | 02:20 | |
*** schwicht has quit IRC | 02:20 | |
*** Daisy has quit IRC | 02:20 | |
*** whenry has quit IRC | 02:22 | |
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:23 | |
*** ramashri has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:24 | |
*** novas0x2a|laptop has quit IRC | 02:25 | |
*** reed has quit IRC | 02:25 | |
*** zhikunliu has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:26 | |
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC | 02:26 | |
*** sbalukoff has quit IRC | 02:27 | |
*** epico has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:28 | |
*** kayaliu__ has quit IRC | 02:30 | |
*** VijayB_ has quit IRC | 02:31 | |
*** manishg has quit IRC | 02:32 | |
*** VijayB has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:32 | |
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:33 | |
*** dstanek_zzz is now known as dstanek | 02:33 | |
*** arnaud has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:33 | |
*** VijayB has quit IRC | 02:37 | |
*** jjmb has quit IRC | 02:38 | |
*** paragan has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:41 | |
*** paragan has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:41 | |
*** kayaliu__ has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:41 | |
*** Michalik_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:41 | |
*** jjmb has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:43 | |
*** jjmb has quit IRC | 02:43 | |
*** ramashri has quit IRC | 02:45 | |
*** mspreitz has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:46 | |
*** primeministerp has quit IRC | 02:46 | |
*** Daisy has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:47 | |
*** matiu has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:49 | |
*** matiu has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:49 | |
*** rwsu has quit IRC | 02:52 | |
*** dstanek is now known as dstanek_zzz | 02:52 | |
*** hrybacki has quit IRC | 02:56 | |
*** nedbat has quit IRC | 02:59 | |
*** tvoran has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:00 | |
*** bgorski has quit IRC | 03:01 | |
*** tvoran has quit IRC | 03:01 | |
*** tvoran has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:01 | |
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC | 03:03 | |
*** dstanek_zzz is now known as dstanek | 03:04 | |
*** crc32 has quit IRC | 03:05 | |
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:08 | |
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC | 03:10 | |
*** ramishra has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:10 | |
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:11 | |
*** lbragstad has quit IRC | 03:11 | |
*** mtanino has quit IRC | 03:11 | |
*** prad has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:12 | |
*** vkmc has quit IRC | 03:15 | |
*** Michalik_ has quit IRC | 03:17 | |
*** zhiyan is now known as zhiyan_ | 03:20 | |
*** SridharG has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:20 | |
*** sankarshan_away is now known as sankarshan | 03:24 | |
*** bdpayne has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:25 | |
*** zhiyan_ is now known as zhiyan | 03:26 | |
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC | 03:27 | |
*** haomaiw__ has quit IRC | 03:27 | |
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:27 | |
*** kayaliu__ has quit IRC | 03:29 | |
*** kayaliu_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:29 | |
*** caleb_ has quit IRC | 03:29 | |
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:30 | |
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC | 03:31 | |
*** tvoran_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:31 | |
*** tvoran_ has quit IRC | 03:33 | |
*** tvoran_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:34 | |
*** SridharG has quit IRC | 03:35 | |
*** tvoran has quit IRC | 03:35 | |
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:35 | |
*** jjmb has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:37 | |
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC | 03:39 | |
*** gcb has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:41 | |
*** arnaud has quit IRC | 03:42 | |
*** nosnos has quit IRC | 03:43 | |
*** vjay3 has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:45 | |
*** vpanizo has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:48 | |
*** dguitarbite has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:49 | |
*** Longgeek has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:52 | |
*** dims_ has quit IRC | 03:53 | |
*** eghobo has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:55 | |
*** eghobo has quit IRC | 03:55 | |
*** eghobo has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:56 | |
*** coolsvap|afk is now known as coolsvap | 03:57 | |
*** Longgeek has quit IRC | 03:57 | |
*** dguitarbite has quit IRC | 04:00 | |
*** jamespage has quit IRC | 04:00 | |
*** jamespage has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:00 | |
*** jamespage has quit IRC | 04:00 | |
*** jamespage has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:00 | |
*** sweston has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:00 | |
*** tvoran_ has quit IRC | 04:01 | |
*** yamamoto_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:01 | |
*** MarkAtwood has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:02 | |
*** MarkAtwood has quit IRC | 04:02 | |
*** whenry has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:06 | |
*** cknight has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:13 | |
*** Michalik_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:13 | |
*** johnpur has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:13 | |
*** novas0x2a|laptop has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:14 | |
*** cknight has quit IRC | 04:14 | |
*** neelashah has quit IRC | 04:16 | |
*** johnpur has left #openstack-meeting | 04:16 | |
*** ramishra has quit IRC | 04:17 | |
*** Michalik_ has quit IRC | 04:18 | |
*** fnaval has quit IRC | 04:18 | |
*** shankar has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:19 | |
*** ramishra has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:21 | |
*** lcheng has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:21 | |
*** ngoswami has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:22 | |
*** kashyapk has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:22 | |
*** nelsnels_ has quit IRC | 04:22 | |
*** nosnos has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:24 | |
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:25 | |
*** tkay has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:25 | |
*** kashyapk has quit IRC | 04:26 | |
*** kashyapk has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:26 | |
*** yisun has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:27 | |
*** david-lyle has quit IRC | 04:33 | |
*** marcoemorais has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:34 | |
*** yingjun has quit IRC | 04:35 | |
*** yingjun has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:36 | |
*** eghobo has quit IRC | 04:36 | |
*** yingjun has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:36 | |
*** marcoemorais1 has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:36 | |
*** gokrokve has quit IRC | 04:37 | |
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:38 | |
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:38 | |
*** marcoemorais has quit IRC | 04:39 | |
*** whenry has quit IRC | 04:41 | |
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:46 | |
*** banix has quit IRC | 04:46 | |
*** kayaliu_ has quit IRC | 04:47 | |
*** deepakcs has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:48 | |
*** dstanek is now known as dstanek_zzz | 04:50 | |
*** eghobo has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:50 | |
*** Praveen has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:50 | |
*** ngoswami has quit IRC | 04:50 | |
*** dims_ has quit IRC | 04:50 | |
*** elo2 has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:51 | |
*** ildikov has quit IRC | 04:51 | |
*** ArxCruz_ has quit IRC | 04:52 | |
*** Daisy has quit IRC | 04:53 | |
*** alonha has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:53 | |
*** elo has quit IRC | 04:53 | |
*** eghobo has quit IRC | 04:54 | |
*** eghobo has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:54 | |
*** Praveen has quit IRC | 04:54 | |
*** whenry has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:57 | |
*** topol has quit IRC | 04:57 | |
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:58 | |
*** gokrokve has quit IRC | 04:58 | |
*** harlowja is now known as harlowja_away | 04:59 | |
*** gongysh has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:59 | |
*** hareeshpc has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:59 | |
*** s3wong has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:59 | |
yamahata | hi | 05:00 |
---|---|---|
sweston | hi | 05:00 |
s3wong | hello | 05:00 |
hareeshpc | Hi | 05:00 |
*** natarajk has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:00 | |
alonha | Hi | 05:00 |
gongysh | hi | 05:00 |
natarajk | hi | 05:00 |
yamahata | #startmeeting servicevm-device-manager | 05:01 |
openstack | Meeting started Tue Jun 10 05:01:05 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is yamahata. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 05:01 |
openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 05:01 |
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: servicevm-device-manager)" | 05:01 | |
openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'servicevm_device_manager' | 05:01 |
yamahata | #topic Announcement | 05:01 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Announcement (Meeting topic: servicevm-device-manager)" | 05:01 | |
*** tian has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:01 | |
yamahata | created irc channel on freenode #tacker | 05:01 |
*** shankar has quit IRC | 05:01 | |
yamahata | requested repository on stackforge. it's under review | 05:01 |
*** nshaikh has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:02 | |
yamahata | #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/97435/ | 05:02 |
s3wong | OK | 05:02 |
*** arnaud has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:02 | |
hareeshpc | ok | 05:03 |
yamahata | #topic nfv follow up | 05:03 |
*** openstack changes topic to "nfv follow up (Meeting topic: servicevm-device-manager)" | 05:03 | |
*** zhikunliu has quit IRC | 05:04 | |
*** OSM has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:04 | |
yamahata | As BP for NFV support, two Blueprints for vlan trunking and unfirewall-unaddress are proposed by Ian. | 05:04 |
*** OSM is now known as songole | 05:04 | |
yamahata | Regarding vlan trunking, I think it's mostly same to vlan-aware-vm/l2-gateway. So we need to coordinate it. | 05:05 |
alonha | Can you point to the blueprints? | 05:05 |
yamahata | #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/97714/ | 05:05 |
s3wong | yamahata: I think mestery agrees with your -1 on the VLAN trunking bp | 05:06 |
yamahata | #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/94612/ | 05:06 |
*** bobmel has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:06 | |
s3wong | it is redundant to what has been filed | 05:06 |
yamahata | #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/l2-gateway | 05:06 |
yamahata | no neutron-spec for the last one | 05:06 |
yamahata | s3wong: Yes. | 05:06 |
bobmel | Hi all! bob melander here. Sorry for being late. | 05:07 |
yamahata | I pinged Eric, but haven't got any reply. | 05:07 |
yamahata | bobmel: hello | 05:07 |
yisun | but no one is working on L2 GW | 05:07 |
s3wong | yamahata: also, ijw filed another on having two interfaces to same network bp | 05:07 |
yamahata | bobmel: It's early morning there? | 05:07 |
s3wong | bobmel: changed your handle already? :-) | 05:07 |
sweston | yamahata: late evening :-) | 05:07 |
bobmel | yamahata: yes, early morning and I'm more of a evening guy :-) | 05:08 |
yisun | Does anyone know who is working on L2 GW? | 05:08 |
yamahata | I'm willing to write l2gw or update vlan-ware-vlan spec. | 05:08 |
yamahata | or anyone volunteer? | 05:08 |
s3wong | yisun: I believe someone from Ericsson | 05:08 |
yisun | But what is the problem to let Eric to continue? | 05:08 |
yisun | Eric is from Ericsson | 05:08 |
yisun | But L2 GW I don’t think so | 05:09 |
bobmel | yisun: Stephan baucke and Rasha Ben Ali, both ericsson | 05:09 |
yisun | But the owner of L2 GW is Rossella Sblendido | 05:09 |
yisun | I’m reading the wrong one? | 05:09 |
bobmel | ok, aha, has it changed recently? | 05:10 |
*** garyduan has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:10 | |
yamahata | yisun: the issues is Eric is not responsive recently. | 05:10 |
yisun | No, it was like that a year ago | 05:10 |
bobmel | Stephan and Rasha also have some l2gw blueprint I beleive | 05:10 |
garyduan | Hi, sorry, I am late | 05:10 |
yamahata | garyduan: hi. | 05:10 |
yisun | Ok, little history about these vlan or L2 thing | 05:11 |
garyduan | yamahata: hi | 05:11 |
yamahata | I'm wondering how we can accelerate or make things progress. | 05:11 |
yisun | In the Hongkong summit, I was trying to consolidate the efforts, only ERIC responsed and worked on it | 05:11 |
yisun | no one else make any progress since then other than Eric | 05:11 |
yamahata | Okay, I'll update BP unless Eric does. | 05:11 |
yamahata | Then we'll see how the spec review goes | 05:12 |
s3wong | the one rossella_s filed was a while back, so not sure if she is still going to work on it | 05:12 |
yamahata | s3wong: can you ping him? | 05:12 |
yisun | I really think she is from Midocura :-) | 05:12 |
s3wong | similar to the port mirroring bp, the one implementing it doesn't need to be the one filing the bp | 05:12 |
yamahata | her? | 05:12 |
s3wong | yisun: she used to be, she is now at SUSE :-) | 05:12 |
s3wong | yisun: she filed it when she was with Midokura | 05:13 |
yamahata | s3wong: okay | 05:13 |
s3wong | yamahata: yes, I can ping rossella_s to see if she is still interested in implementing it | 05:13 |
*** lbragstad has quit IRC | 05:13 | |
yamahata | #action yamahata update BP, see how review goes unless eric does. | 05:13 |
yamahata | #action s3wong ping rossella_s | 05:13 |
*** gcb has quit IRC | 05:14 | |
yisun | Yamahata, by the BP, you meant L2 GW? | 05:14 |
yamahata | Yes L2Gw. | 05:14 |
*** vpanizo has quit IRC | 05:14 | |
*** Michalik_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:14 | |
yisun | Ok | 05:14 |
yamahata | If rossella_s write it, it's great. otherwise I'll take it. | 05:14 |
yamahata | the next blueprint is unfirewall/unaddressed port | 05:15 |
yamahata | #link https://review.openstack.org/97715 | 05:15 |
*** ildikov has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:15 | |
yamahata | It's also by Ian. | 05:15 |
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:15 | |
yamahata | The proposal is, unfirewall == unaddressed. | 05:15 |
yamahata | Do we want to separate them? | 05:16 |
yamahata | I mean unfirewalled port with address and unfirewalled port without address. | 05:16 |
*** zhikunliu has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:17 | |
yisun | Yamahata: why do you want to separate them? | 05:17 |
alonha | Maybe the more proper term is 'trusted port'? | 05:17 |
yamahata | yisun: Yes, I though. I'm not sure if there is a use case. | 05:18 |
yamahata | Only unfirewalled port without address is okay? | 05:18 |
yisun | Gary: we have such a port, right? | 05:18 |
bobmel | Router ports would be one example | 05:19 |
garyduan | it could be unfirewalled but with address | 05:19 |
yamahata | For router vm case, port needs IP address without firewall. | 05:19 |
*** Michalik_ has quit IRC | 05:19 | |
s3wong | yamahata: yisun: garyduan: this is port without security group, right? | 05:19 |
garyduan | right | 05:19 |
yamahata | s3wong: yes. | 05:19 |
yisun | s3wong: it does not have IP either | 05:19 |
s3wong | yamahata: we also need port that isn't attached to any subnet, thus port w/out IP | 05:20 |
yamahata | s3wong: Does it mean unaddressed? Is the port associated to only network? | 05:20 |
yisun | Here is one more case, that I don’t know which buck it fits | 05:20 |
yisun | I have a redundant ports to back up each other | 05:21 |
yisun | and both them have the same MAC and IP | 05:21 |
s3wong | yamahata: IP address assigned to VM is from user specifying which network the port belongs to; if we want to create VM with a port that is not attached to any network, it seems reasonable that it has to be without any IP address | 05:22 |
gongysh | for router vm, we need to remove anti spoof chain. | 05:22 |
s3wong | yisun: sounds like a different bp | 05:23 |
s3wong | need to update that requirements on our list | 05:23 |
gongysh | w3wong: not attached to any network -> not attached to any subnets? | 05:23 |
yisun | s3wong: could be | 05:24 |
yamahata | There are many requirements for port attributes. I'll create wiki page for it. | 05:24 |
yisun | all: bascially, for the service VM, we may have to disable all firewall checks | 05:24 |
yamahata | Then we can summarize use case and requirement. then break down to BPs | 05:24 |
yamahata | #action yamahata create wiki page for port attributes | 05:24 |
yisun | yamahata+1 | 05:24 |
s3wong | gongysh: not attached to any network or subnet, in a serviceVM pool, ideally, we don't set the VM interface attachment and its IP address until we know which network we want to attach the port to | 05:24 |
s3wong | yamahata: that is definitely a good idea | 05:25 |
yisun | s3wong: in that case, we can create vnic and plugin network when we need | 05:25 |
bobmel | yamahata: +1 | 05:25 |
garyduan | there is a case that one port can server multiple networks | 05:25 |
s3wong | yisun: can we create VM without any port initially? | 05:25 |
yamahata | At least the consensus is Ian's proposal should be split/enhanced into some BPs. | 05:26 |
s3wong | garyduan: is it supported today? | 05:26 |
yisun | s3wong, I think you need a vnic for mgt at least | 05:26 |
*** nkubota has quit IRC | 05:26 | |
garyduan | s3wong: in neutron, no | 05:26 |
natarajk | yisub: that's correct | 05:26 |
natarajk | you need atleast one for mgmt for service vm | 05:26 |
s3wong | yisun: OK - that's cool, since yamahata is introducing mgmt interface concept, that could be the first interface for serviceVM | 05:27 |
yisun | natarajk: the is the basic requirement and any other interfaces can be create on daemon | 05:27 |
yisun | s/the/this/ | 05:27 |
bobmel | natarajk: yisun: unless you do management by RPC proxy | 05:27 |
yamahata | I create wiki page | 05:28 |
yamahata | #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ServiceVM/neutron-port-attributes | 05:28 |
yamahata | just blank yet. | 05:28 |
bobmel | natarajk: yisun: Then you may not have mgmt vnic | 05:28 |
yisun | bobmel: why? | 05:28 |
yamahata | #action anyone update wiki page with usecase/requirement | 05:28 |
*** kayaliu_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:28 | |
natarajk | bobmel: i meant we need atleast one for mgmt | 05:28 |
yisun | natarajk:+1 | 05:29 |
*** vpanizo has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:30 | |
bobmel | yisun: natarajk: I was referring to mgmt done as specified here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Oslo/blueprints/message-proxy-server | 05:30 |
s3wong | bobmel: I think yisun and others are saying having a mgmt intf is a basic requirement for serviceVM | 05:30 |
yamahata | bobmel: the blueprint needs to be updated according to the discussion at the summit | 05:31 |
yamahata | The first target is to build RPC over marconi. | 05:31 |
yisun | bobmel: I need to read the bp, but shouldn’t we at least have an interface that we can send restful request? | 05:32 |
*** radek has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:32 | |
yamahata | I mean "enhancing neutron metadata agent and use notification over HTTP" section | 05:32 |
*** nkubota has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:33 | |
bobmel | s3wong: Ok, that I agree with. Just need not necessarily be a network interface, | 05:33 |
garyduan | Are we still talking neutron port attributes? | 05:33 |
*** vuil has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:34 | |
*** vuil has quit IRC | 05:34 | |
yamahata | Seems no. | 05:34 |
yamahata | that's all from me as nfv follow up? | 05:34 |
s3wong | yamahata: mgmt interface is NOT Neutron port, isn't it? | 05:35 |
yamahata | anthing else? | 05:35 |
yamahata | s3wong: mgmt interface can be non-neutron port. | 05:35 |
yamahata | s3wong: But Neutron port can be mgmt port. That's the first goal. | 05:35 |
s3wong | garyduan: so what yamahata said above ^^^^^ | 05:35 |
s3wong | garyduan: not necessarily about neutron port | 05:36 |
*** pradipta_away is now known as pradipta | 05:36 | |
s3wong | yamahata: thanks! | 05:36 |
yamahata | #topic open discussion | 05:37 |
*** openstack changes topic to "open discussion (Meeting topic: servicevm-device-manager)" | 05:37 | |
yamahata | When tacker-spec repository is created, I'd like to start spec review of Rest api of device manager. | 05:38 |
garyduan | yamahata: I was not able to attend last week's meeting | 05:38 |
yamahata | garyduan: no problem. | 05:38 |
garyduan | yamahata: do we have these BP listed somewhere? | 05:38 |
*** gyee has quit IRC | 05:38 | |
yamahata | #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ServiceVM/neutron-and-other-project-items | 05:38 |
alonha | What is the differenc between this group and the new NFV one? Aren't both deal with the same problems? | 05:38 |
yamahata | you also want to see | 05:39 |
yamahata | #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NFV | 05:39 |
garyduan | thanks | 05:39 |
s3wong | alonha: at least at this point, the tacker team has not talked about things like how to saturate a 40G link | 05:39 |
alonha | Sorry, what is tacker team? | 05:40 |
yamahata | aloga: Maybe, we're understanding the difference. If BPs is covered by BP, it can be under NFV unbrella. | 05:40 |
s3wong | alonha: sorry, the ServiceVM team :-) | 05:40 |
yamahata | covered by *NFV* | 05:40 |
*** tappel has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:41 | |
yamahata | aloga: serviceVM/device manager is not always covered by NFV. | 05:41 |
yamahata | aloga: off course we'll work closely with NFV. Maybe subteam of NFV? | 05:41 |
garyduan | In general, I think we are not able to address all of the requirements. We need to identify several issues we must address first. | 05:41 |
*** rajeshr has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:41 | |
alonha | So, for now, two different groups? | 05:42 |
s3wong | garyduan: agreed, and based on last week's meeting, the general consensus is the serviceVM team will prioritize NFV use cases to address | 05:42 |
*** kayaliu_ has quit IRC | 05:42 | |
s3wong | alonha: at this point, the NFV subteam's mission is to gather requirements and file bps | 05:42 |
*** kayaliu_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:42 | |
*** Michalik_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:43 | |
alonha | ok, thanks. | 05:43 |
s3wong | alonha: OTOH, serviceVM team is here to get implementation / design done | 05:43 |
alonha | got it, thanks, | 05:43 |
yamahata | anything else to discuss? | 05:44 |
yisun | BTW— I got a new requirement today, not solid, but worth to share | 05:44 |
yisun | We are doing performance tuning on our service VM. | 05:45 |
yisun | We were trying to add some early random drop logic | 05:45 |
*** paulbc has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:45 | |
yisun | but we can not find a good trigger for it. Since we have not clue on the hypervisro load | 05:45 |
yisun | Even in the VM, our CPU usage is ok, but hypervisor may be already out of CPU. | 05:46 |
yisun | So, in order to issue something accurate, some hypervisor resource usage visibility may be helpful | 05:46 |
yamahata | yisun: somthing like feeding some statistics of ceilometer to inside VM? | 05:46 |
yisun | yamahata: there was one of thing I was thinking | 05:47 |
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:47 | |
*** Michalik_ has quit IRC | 05:47 | |
yamahata | sounds interesting | 05:47 |
s3wong | yisun: yamahata: wonder if Ceilometer (used mostly for tenant) can cover hypervisor stats | 05:47 |
yisun | yamahata: since this is only the first a few day that I’m looking into this, so it is not a solid idea yet, I will report back when I get more | 05:48 |
yamahata | s3wong: At worst we can write a driver to gather such info | 05:48 |
yamahata | s3wong: I guess there already is, though | 05:48 |
s3wong | yamahata: OK | 05:48 |
*** Longgeek has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:49 | |
garyduan | I remember there was discussion at Neutron pod at Atlanta | 05:49 |
*** Longgeek has quit IRC | 05:49 | |
garyduan | talking about gathering traffic info by agent | 05:50 |
*** kashyapk has quit IRC | 05:50 | |
*** eguz has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:50 | |
*** eghobo has quit IRC | 05:50 | |
*** Longgeek has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:50 | |
*** kashyapk has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:50 | |
*** alonha has left #openstack-meeting | 05:51 | |
yamahata | nothing more? | 05:51 |
*** Longgeek has quit IRC | 05:51 | |
*** dstanek_zzz is now known as dstanek | 05:51 | |
*** Longgeek has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:51 | |
*** dims_ has quit IRC | 05:51 | |
yamahata | Okay let's review blueprint and update port attributes page | 05:51 |
s3wong | garyduan: so that is a fair requirements, you can put that into serviceVM wiki | 05:51 |
bobmel | yamahata: I just added one about the sec group disable | 05:52 |
yamahata | bobmel: thanks | 05:52 |
yamahata | see you next week or nfv meeting | 05:53 |
yamahata | #endmeeting | 05:53 |
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings" | 05:53 | |
openstack | Meeting ended Tue Jun 10 05:53:06 2014 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 05:53 |
openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/servicevm_device_manager/2014/servicevm_device_manager.2014-06-10-05.01.html | 05:53 |
openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/servicevm_device_manager/2014/servicevm_device_manager.2014-06-10-05.01.txt | 05:53 |
openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/servicevm_device_manager/2014/servicevm_device_manager.2014-06-10-05.01.log.html | 05:53 |
garyduan | s3wong: I agree on the requirement in general | 05:53 |
yamahata | garyduan: sorry, too eary to close | 05:53 |
garyduan | s3wong: but not necessarily the approach | 05:53 |
yamahata | early | 05:53 |
*** yingjun has quit IRC | 05:53 | |
garyduan | yamahata: that's fine. | 05:53 |
s3wong | garyduan: yep, week by week we get more requests, we will prioritize, but good to have a centralized place to write them down | 05:54 |
*** yingjun has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:54 | |
yisun | s3wong: do we have a target date that we will close the requirement collection and start to set priority? | 05:54 |
*** songole has quit IRC | 05:54 | |
s3wong | yisun: not yet :-) | 05:54 |
yisun | sorry, I will not in the latest meeting, this is only a catch up question, just in case I missed it | 05:55 |
yamahata | yisun: s3wong do we want to set? | 05:55 |
yisun | s/will/was/ | 05:55 |
s3wong | yamahata: do we want to get things moving before project gets into incubation (because that will take some time) | 05:55 |
*** natarajk has quit IRC | 05:56 | |
yisun | yamahata: it really depends on how we to plan this. | 05:56 |
yisun | s/to/want to/ | 05:56 |
yamahata | s3wong: yisun I see | 05:56 |
yamahata | I thought it would be good to have some code working before applying incubation process | 05:57 |
s3wong | yamahata: absolutely | 05:57 |
*** jtomasek has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:57 | |
yamahata | And have some experience with openstack CI | 05:57 |
s3wong | yamahata: and also plan for maximizing benefits for community | 05:57 |
*** blogan has quit IRC | 05:58 | |
s3wong | anyway, let's add requirements on the wiki page | 06:00 |
yisun | +1 | 06:00 |
s3wong | meeting time's up. see you guys next week :-) | 06:00 |
bobmel | Bye | 06:00 |
s3wong | bye | 06:00 |
yisun | bye | 06:00 |
garyduan | bye | 06:00 |
sweston | bye | 06:00 |
*** dstanek is now known as dstanek_zzz | 06:01 | |
hareeshpc | bye | 06:02 |
*** hareeshpc has left #openstack-meeting | 06:02 | |
*** Longgeek has quit IRC | 06:04 | |
*** Longgeek has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:04 | |
*** Longgeek has quit IRC | 06:04 | |
*** Longgeek has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:05 | |
*** kayaliu_ has quit IRC | 06:06 | |
*** Longgeek has quit IRC | 06:06 | |
*** Longgeek_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:06 | |
*** kashyapk has quit IRC | 06:08 | |
*** arnaud has quit IRC | 06:08 | |
*** ramishra has quit IRC | 06:08 | |
*** Daisy has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:08 | |
*** ramishra has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:08 | |
*** kashyapk has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:08 | |
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:10 | |
*** vivek-ebay has quit IRC | 06:11 | |
*** radek has quit IRC | 06:13 | |
*** bdpayne has quit IRC | 06:13 | |
*** whenry has quit IRC | 06:13 | |
*** cody-somerville has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:17 | |
*** cody-somerville has quit IRC | 06:17 | |
*** cody-somerville has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:17 | |
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:17 | |
*** yisun has left #openstack-meeting | 06:17 | |
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:18 | |
*** s3wong has quit IRC | 06:18 | |
*** mkoderer has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:21 | |
*** dims_ has quit IRC | 06:22 | |
*** Macaveli has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:24 | |
*** novas0x2a|laptop has quit IRC | 06:27 | |
*** novas0x2a|laptop has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:28 | |
*** Fdot has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:28 | |
*** stevemar2 has quit IRC | 06:30 | |
*** evgenyf has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:30 | |
*** jtomasek has quit IRC | 06:31 | |
*** bdpayne has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:33 | |
*** bdpayne_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:35 | |
*** yamamoto_ has quit IRC | 06:35 | |
*** whenry has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:39 | |
*** bdpayne has quit IRC | 06:39 | |
*** xuhanp has quit IRC | 06:40 | |
*** xuhanp has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:41 | |
*** eguz has quit IRC | 06:41 | |
*** Mandell has quit IRC | 06:42 | |
*** Michalik_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:43 | |
*** ngoswami has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:46 | |
*** jtomasek has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:48 | |
*** Michalik_ has quit IRC | 06:48 | |
*** lbragstad has quit IRC | 06:49 | |
*** luqas has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:50 | |
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:50 | |
*** afazekas is now known as __afazekas | 06:51 | |
*** shankar has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:52 | |
*** dguitarbite has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:52 | |
*** cody-somerville has quit IRC | 06:55 | |
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC | 06:58 | |
*** mrunge has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:58 | |
*** jcoufal has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:59 | |
*** nosnos has quit IRC | 06:59 | |
*** matsuhashi has quit IRC | 07:01 | |
*** matsuhas_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:01 | |
*** armax has quit IRC | 07:01 | |
*** kashyapk has quit IRC | 07:03 | |
*** kashyapk has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:03 | |
*** paulbc has quit IRC | 07:03 | |
*** whenry has quit IRC | 07:04 | |
*** nosnos has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:05 | |
*** flaper87|afk is now known as flaper87 | 07:06 | |
*** devlaps has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:07 | |
*** yingjun has quit IRC | 07:07 | |
*** yingjun has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:07 | |
*** devlaps has quit IRC | 07:07 | |
*** kashyapk has quit IRC | 07:08 | |
*** cody-somerville has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:09 | |
*** tkay has quit IRC | 07:10 | |
*** dguitarbite has quit IRC | 07:12 | |
*** ttrifonov_zZzz is now known as ttrifonov | 07:13 | |
*** tkay has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:16 | |
*** sushils_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:16 | |
*** pdehaye has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:17 | |
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:17 | |
*** dims_ has quit IRC | 07:22 | |
*** bogdando has quit IRC | 07:23 | |
*** tkay has quit IRC | 07:23 | |
*** sushils_ has quit IRC | 07:24 | |
*** bogdando has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:24 | |
*** doron_afk has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:25 | |
*** pdehaye has quit IRC | 07:25 | |
*** bauzas has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:26 | |
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC | 07:28 | |
*** jackmccann has quit IRC | 07:30 | |
*** andreaf has quit IRC | 07:31 | |
*** phil__ has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:31 | |
*** mwagner_lap has quit IRC | 07:34 | |
*** mrunge has quit IRC | 07:35 | |
*** kashyapk has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:36 | |
*** mwagner_lap has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:36 | |
*** Macaveli is now known as Macaveli|BRB | 07:38 | |
*** ominakov has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:40 | |
*** ArthurBerezin has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:41 | |
*** jlibosva has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:42 | |
*** Macaveli|BRB is now known as Macaveli | 07:44 | |
*** Michalik_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:44 | |
*** enykeev has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:45 | |
*** tappel has quit IRC | 07:46 | |
*** ArthurBerezin has left #openstack-meeting | 07:46 | |
*** bobmel has quit IRC | 07:47 | |
*** thomasbiege has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:47 | |
*** Michalik_ has quit IRC | 07:48 | |
*** ajo|mac has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:50 | |
*** SridharG has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:51 | |
*** sweston has quit IRC | 07:54 | |
*** afazekas has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:55 | |
*** kashyapk has quit IRC | 07:56 | |
*** hashar has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:56 | |
*** kashyapk has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:56 | |
*** yingjun has quit IRC | 07:58 | |
*** andreaf has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:58 | |
*** dguitarbite has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:59 | |
*** yingjun has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:59 | |
*** ihrachyshka has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:59 | |
*** nkubota has quit IRC | 08:00 | |
*** nkubota has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:00 | |
*** kashyapk has quit IRC | 08:01 | |
*** vjay3 has quit IRC | 08:04 | |
*** vrovachev has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:05 | |
*** kashyapk has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:06 | |
*** julienvey has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:07 | |
*** bauzas has quit IRC | 08:07 | |
*** gcb has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:08 | |
*** vivek-ebay has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:12 | |
*** IvanBerezovskiy has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:12 | |
*** ramishra has quit IRC | 08:12 | |
*** sweston has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:15 | |
*** sbalukoff has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:15 | |
*** vjay3 has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:15 | |
*** ndipanov has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:17 | |
*** derekh_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:17 | |
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:18 | |
*** ygbo has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:19 | |
*** ramishra has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:19 | |
*** mrunge has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:19 | |
*** vivek-ebay has quit IRC | 08:20 | |
*** safchain has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:20 | |
*** dims_ has quit IRC | 08:22 | |
*** marcoemorais1 has quit IRC | 08:23 | |
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:25 | |
*** ajo|mac has quit IRC | 08:31 | |
*** ajo|mac has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:33 | |
*** sweston has quit IRC | 08:35 | |
*** nkubota has quit IRC | 08:36 | |
*** matsuhas_ has quit IRC | 08:38 | |
*** kashyapk has quit IRC | 08:38 | |
*** kashyapk has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:39 | |
*** bdpayne_ has quit IRC | 08:39 | |
*** nosnos has quit IRC | 08:40 | |
*** pelix has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:41 | |
*** lbragstad has quit IRC | 08:43 | |
*** nosnos has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:43 | |
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:43 | |
*** nosnos has quit IRC | 08:44 | |
*** matsuhashi has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:44 | |
*** Michalik_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:45 | |
*** ramishra has quit IRC | 08:47 | |
*** Michalik_ has quit IRC | 08:50 | |
*** jhenner has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:50 | |
*** jcoufal has quit IRC | 08:55 | |
*** jcoufal has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:56 | |
*** ArthurBerezin1 has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:58 | |
*** thomasbiege1 has joined #openstack-meeting | 09:00 | |
*** sweston has joined #openstack-meeting | 09:02 | |
*** nosnos has joined #openstack-meeting | 09:03 | |
*** yingjun has quit IRC | 09:03 | |
*** yingjun has joined #openstack-meeting | 09:03 | |
*** thomasbiege has quit IRC | 09:04 | |
*** jgallard has joined #openstack-meeting | 09:05 | |
*** ramishra has joined #openstack-meeting | 09:06 | |
*** novas0x2a|laptop has quit IRC | 09:07 | |
*** zhikunliu has quit IRC | 09:09 | |
*** ihrachyshka has quit IRC | 09:10 | |
*** idegtiarov has joined #openstack-meeting | 09:10 | |
*** isviridov_ is now known as isviridov | 09:12 | |
*** ArthurBerezin1 has quit IRC | 09:17 | |
*** llu is now known as llu-away | 09:17 | |
*** llu-away is now known as llu | 09:17 | |
*** nedbat has joined #openstack-meeting | 09:17 | |
*** pradipta is now known as pradipta_away | 09:18 | |
*** zhiyan is now known as zhiyan_ | 09:18 | |
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 09:19 | |
*** tomoe_ has quit IRC | 09:19 | |
*** luqas has quit IRC | 09:20 | |
*** pradipta_away is now known as pradipta | 09:20 | |
*** evgenyf has quit IRC | 09:21 | |
*** pradipta is now known as pradipta_away | 09:21 | |
*** Daisy has quit IRC | 09:23 | |
*** mspreitz has quit IRC | 09:23 | |
*** sweston has quit IRC | 09:24 | |
*** dims_ has quit IRC | 09:25 | |
*** ArthurBerezin has joined #openstack-meeting | 09:32 | |
*** doron_afk is now known as doron | 09:33 | |
*** paulbc has joined #openstack-meeting | 09:33 | |
*** ArthurBerezin1 has joined #openstack-meeting | 09:35 | |
*** nacim has joined #openstack-meeting | 09:35 | |
*** ramishra has quit IRC | 09:36 | |
*** KurtRao has joined #openstack-meeting | 09:36 | |
*** xianghui has quit IRC | 09:37 | |
*** ArthurBerezin has quit IRC | 09:37 | |
*** belmoreira has joined #openstack-meeting | 09:42 | |
*** weshay has joined #openstack-meeting | 09:43 | |
*** yingjun has quit IRC | 09:45 | |
*** Michalik_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 09:46 | |
*** luqas has joined #openstack-meeting | 09:49 | |
*** doron is now known as doron_afk | 09:49 | |
*** kashyapk has quit IRC | 09:49 | |
*** xianghui has joined #openstack-meeting | 09:50 | |
*** paulbc has quit IRC | 09:50 | |
*** kashyapk has joined #openstack-meeting | 09:50 | |
*** Michalik_ has quit IRC | 09:51 | |
*** xianghui has quit IRC | 09:51 | |
*** sankarshan is now known as sankarshan_away | 09:52 | |
*** xianghui has joined #openstack-meeting | 09:52 | |
*** ihrachyshka has joined #openstack-meeting | 09:53 | |
*** kashyapk has quit IRC | 09:54 | |
*** vjay3 has quit IRC | 09:56 | |
*** ArthurBerezin1 has left #openstack-meeting | 09:59 | |
*** julienvey has quit IRC | 09:59 | |
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting | 10:00 | |
*** gongysh has quit IRC | 10:03 | |
*** gcb has quit IRC | 10:04 | |
*** jgallard has quit IRC | 10:07 | |
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting | 10:11 | |
*** xuhanp has quit IRC | 10:14 | |
*** MaxV has joined #openstack-meeting | 10:16 | |
*** gcb has joined #openstack-meeting | 10:16 | |
*** evgenyf has joined #openstack-meeting | 10:16 | |
*** igordcard has joined #openstack-meeting | 10:16 | |
*** doron_afk is now known as doron | 10:18 | |
*** matiu has quit IRC | 10:21 | |
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 10:21 | |
*** ngoswami has quit IRC | 10:22 | |
*** ngoswami has joined #openstack-meeting | 10:22 | |
*** mrunge has quit IRC | 10:24 | |
*** egallen has quit IRC | 10:27 | |
*** dims_ has quit IRC | 10:27 | |
*** mrunge has joined #openstack-meeting | 10:29 | |
*** hashar has quit IRC | 10:32 | |
*** paragan has quit IRC | 10:33 | |
*** kashyapk has joined #openstack-meeting | 10:34 | |
*** matiu has joined #openstack-meeting | 10:35 | |
*** xianghui has quit IRC | 10:38 | |
*** MaxV has quit IRC | 10:41 | |
*** ajo|mac has quit IRC | 10:43 | |
*** jjmb has quit IRC | 10:45 | |
*** Michalik_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 10:46 | |
*** vjay3 has joined #openstack-meeting | 10:50 | |
*** Michalik_ has quit IRC | 10:51 | |
*** jjmb has joined #openstack-meeting | 10:54 | |
*** ArthurBerezin has joined #openstack-meeting | 10:56 | |
*** ArthurBerezin has left #openstack-meeting | 10:57 | |
*** matiu has quit IRC | 10:57 | |
*** ekarlso has quit IRC | 10:57 | |
*** julienvey has joined #openstack-meeting | 10:59 | |
*** enykeev has quit IRC | 11:00 | |
*** mahesh__ has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:00 | |
*** xianghui has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:02 | |
*** mahesh__ has quit IRC | 11:03 | |
*** matiu has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:03 | |
*** matiu has quit IRC | 11:03 | |
*** matiu has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:03 | |
*** enykeev has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:04 | |
*** coolsvap is now known as coolsvap|afk | 11:04 | |
*** simonmcc has quit IRC | 11:04 | |
*** bogdando has quit IRC | 11:04 | |
*** bogdando has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:04 | |
*** simonmcc has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:04 | |
*** MaxV has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:05 | |
*** epico has quit IRC | 11:05 | |
*** bauzas has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:06 | |
*** cyeoh has quit IRC | 11:06 | |
*** doron is now known as doron_afk | 11:07 | |
*** bauzas has quit IRC | 11:09 | |
*** schwicht has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:10 | |
*** cyeoh has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:10 | |
*** ngoswami has quit IRC | 11:10 | |
*** yaguang has quit IRC | 11:10 | |
*** ngoswami has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:10 | |
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC | 11:16 | |
*** oomichi_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:16 | |
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:19 | |
*** luqas has quit IRC | 11:22 | |
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:23 | |
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC | 11:26 | |
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC | 11:27 | |
*** vpanizo has quit IRC | 11:28 | |
*** vjay3 has quit IRC | 11:29 | |
*** alexpilotti has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:29 | |
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:32 | |
*** yamahata has quit IRC | 11:32 | |
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:35 | |
*** schwicht has quit IRC | 11:35 | |
*** kashyapk has quit IRC | 11:36 | |
*** kashyapk has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:37 | |
*** miqui has quit IRC | 11:38 | |
*** xianghui has quit IRC | 11:40 | |
*** tomoe_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:41 | |
*** rajeshr has quit IRC | 11:43 | |
*** vjay3 has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:47 | |
*** gcb has quit IRC | 11:47 | |
*** jjmb has quit IRC | 11:47 | |
*** Michalik_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:47 | |
*** eankutse has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:47 | |
*** nedbat has quit IRC | 11:48 | |
*** eankutse has quit IRC | 11:49 | |
*** eankutse has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:49 | |
*** hashar has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:49 | |
*** Michalik_ has quit IRC | 11:51 | |
*** ArxCruz has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:52 | |
*** Youcef_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:53 | |
*** xianghui has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:53 | |
*** Macaveli has quit IRC | 11:56 | |
*** Youcef has quit IRC | 11:56 | |
*** ttrifonov is now known as ttrifonov_zZzz | 11:56 | |
*** ttrifonov_zZzz is now known as ttrifonov | 11:56 | |
*** Macaveli has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:56 | |
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:57 | |
*** paragan has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:00 | |
*** nedbat has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:01 | |
*** jhenner has quit IRC | 12:01 | |
*** jhenner has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:02 | |
*** nedbat has quit IRC | 12:03 | |
*** adalbas has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:04 | |
*** hrybacki has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:05 | |
*** radez_g0n3 is now known as radez | 12:05 | |
*** doron_afk is now known as doron | 12:08 | |
*** afazekas has quit IRC | 12:09 | |
*** aysyd has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:09 | |
*** shakayumi has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:10 | |
*** egallen has quit IRC | 12:12 | |
*** matiu has quit IRC | 12:12 | |
*** kashyapk has quit IRC | 12:13 | |
*** yingjun has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:13 | |
*** kashyapk has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:13 | |
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:14 | |
*** matiu has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:14 | |
*** matiu has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:14 | |
*** jhenner has quit IRC | 12:18 | |
*** kashyapk has quit IRC | 12:19 | |
*** vivek-ebay has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:19 | |
*** jhenner has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:20 | |
*** jdob has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:22 | |
*** xuhanp has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:23 | |
*** vivek-ebay has quit IRC | 12:24 | |
*** afazekas has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:24 | |
*** dkranz has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:24 | |
*** Longgeek_ has quit IRC | 12:25 | |
*** Longgeek has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:26 | |
*** mwagner_lap has quit IRC | 12:26 | |
*** hrybacki_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:26 | |
*** moha_hunt has quit IRC | 12:27 | |
*** kayaliu_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:27 | |
*** dprince has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:28 | |
*** dhellmann has quit IRC | 12:28 | |
*** yaguang has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:29 | |
*** shankar has quit IRC | 12:30 | |
*** yaguang has quit IRC | 12:30 | |
*** yaguang has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:30 | |
*** moha_hunt has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:30 | |
*** mrunge has quit IRC | 12:32 | |
*** jang has quit IRC | 12:33 | |
*** bknudson has quit IRC | 12:34 | |
*** julienvey has quit IRC | 12:35 | |
*** jang has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:36 | |
*** deepakcs has quit IRC | 12:39 | |
*** marekd_ has quit IRC | 12:40 | |
*** pdmars has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:44 | |
*** pdmars has quit IRC | 12:44 | |
*** pdmars has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:45 | |
*** lbragstad has quit IRC | 12:45 | |
*** eankutse has quit IRC | 12:46 | |
*** SridharG has quit IRC | 12:46 | |
*** Michalik_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:48 | |
*** luqas has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:48 | |
*** SridharG has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:48 | |
*** dkranz has quit IRC | 12:48 | |
*** julienvey has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:49 | |
*** boh_ricky has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:50 | |
*** vivek-ebay has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:51 | |
*** bknudson has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:52 | |
*** japplewhite has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:52 | |
*** HenryG has quit IRC | 12:53 | |
*** alexpilotti_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:53 | |
*** Michalik_ has quit IRC | 12:53 | |
*** afazekas has quit IRC | 12:53 | |
*** kashyapk has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:53 | |
*** alexpilotti has quit IRC | 12:54 | |
*** alexpilotti_ is now known as alexpilotti | 12:54 | |
*** SridharGaddam has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:55 | |
*** SridharG has quit IRC | 12:55 | |
*** vivek-eb_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:57 | |
*** mspreitz has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:57 | |
*** changbl has quit IRC | 12:57 | |
*** rbowen has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:57 | |
*** dims_ has quit IRC | 12:59 | |
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:59 | |
*** vivek-ebay has quit IRC | 13:00 | |
*** cknight has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:00 | |
*** jhenner has quit IRC | 13:03 | |
*** julienvey has quit IRC | 13:04 | |
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:05 | |
*** julienvey has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:06 | |
*** jecarey has quit IRC | 13:06 | |
*** amotoki_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:06 | |
*** julim has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:06 | |
*** afazekas has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:07 | |
*** erecio has quit IRC | 13:07 | |
*** erecio has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:08 | |
*** idegtiarov has quit IRC | 13:09 | |
*** julienvey has quit IRC | 13:11 | |
*** kayaliu_ has quit IRC | 13:11 | |
*** kayaliu_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:12 | |
*** vijendar has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:13 | |
*** jhenner has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:17 | |
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:17 | |
*** jecarey has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:18 | |
*** alexpilotti_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:21 | |
*** alexpilotti has quit IRC | 13:22 | |
*** alexpilotti_ is now known as alexpilotti | 13:22 | |
*** bcrochet has quit IRC | 13:23 | |
*** dstanek_zzz is now known as dstanek | 13:23 | |
*** bcrochet has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:25 | |
*** lbragstad1 has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:26 | |
*** boh_ricky has quit IRC | 13:26 | |
*** boh_ricky has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:27 | |
*** tvoran has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:27 | |
*** sushils_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:27 | |
*** sushils_ has quit IRC | 13:27 | |
*** doron is now known as doron_afk | 13:27 | |
*** sushils_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:28 | |
*** lbragstad has quit IRC | 13:28 | |
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:29 | |
*** lbragstad1 has quit IRC | 13:30 | |
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:30 | |
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:31 | |
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:33 | |
*** nedbat has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:34 | |
*** devlaps1 has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:34 | |
*** jgrimm has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:34 | |
*** AndChat|27729 has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:34 | |
*** AndChat|27729 has quit IRC | 13:35 | |
*** jackib has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:35 | |
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC | 13:35 | |
*** julienvey has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:35 | |
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:36 | |
*** dguitarbite has quit IRC | 13:37 | |
*** toan-tran has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:38 | |
*** boh_ricky has quit IRC | 13:38 | |
*** jang has quit IRC | 13:39 | |
*** matsuhashi has quit IRC | 13:39 | |
*** julienvey has quit IRC | 13:40 | |
*** kashyapk has quit IRC | 13:41 | |
*** eharney has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:41 | |
*** Longgeek has quit IRC | 13:42 | |
*** yingjun has quit IRC | 13:42 | |
*** Longgeek has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:42 | |
*** julienvey has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:43 | |
*** kevinconway has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:45 | |
*** noslzzp has quit IRC | 13:46 | |
*** lbragstad has quit IRC | 13:48 | |
*** jackib has quit IRC | 13:48 | |
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:48 | |
*** Michalik_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:49 | |
*** nosnos has quit IRC | 13:50 | |
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC | 13:50 | |
*** haleyb has quit IRC | 13:50 | |
*** mtanino has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:50 | |
*** egallen has quit IRC | 13:53 | |
*** haleyb has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:54 | |
*** Michalik_ has quit IRC | 13:54 | |
*** Fdot_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:54 | |
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:55 | |
*** aveiga has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:55 | |
*** lbragstad1 has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:57 | |
sc68cal | hello everyone, who's ready for some IPv6? | 13:57 |
* aveiga is always ready for IPv6 | 13:58 | |
sc68cal | :) | 13:58 |
*** lbragstad has quit IRC | 13:58 | |
SridharGaddam | hi | 13:58 |
*** thangp has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:58 | |
*** Fdot has quit IRC | 13:59 | |
*** SridharGaddam is now known as SridharG | 13:59 | |
sc68cal | #startmeeting neutron_ipv6 | 14:00 |
openstack | Meeting started Tue Jun 10 14:00:02 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is sc68cal. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 14:00 |
openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 14:00 |
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: neutron_ipv6)" | 14:00 | |
openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'neutron_ipv6' | 14:00 |
*** BrianB___ has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:00 | |
baoli | Hi | 14:00 |
*** pcm_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:00 | |
xuhanp | hi | 14:00 |
SridharG | hello everyone.. | 14:00 |
sc68cal | #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Neutron-IPv6-Subteam#Agenda_for_June_10th | 14:00 |
sc68cal | #topic blueprints | 14:01 |
*** openstack changes topic to "blueprints (Meeting topic: neutron_ipv6)" | 14:01 | |
sc68cal | Do we have any new blueprints to discuss? | 14:02 |
*** Shixiong has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:03 | |
*** jcoufal has quit IRC | 14:03 | |
sc68cal | If not, we'll continue to code reviews | 14:04 |
xuhanp | sc68cal, I saw Shixiong just joined, so shall we discuss the dnsmasq review? | 14:04 |
*** dane_leblanc has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:04 | |
sc68cal | xuhanp: sure, that's a good idea | 14:05 |
aveiga | silence indicates acceptance, sc68cal | 14:05 |
sc68cal | #topic code review | 14:05 |
*** openstack changes topic to "code review (Meeting topic: neutron_ipv6)" | 14:05 | |
aveiga | might as well go to reviews | 14:05 |
Shixiong | sure | 14:05 |
sc68cal | xuhanp: you wanted to take on part of the dnsmasq changes, that was part of Shixiong's large patch? | 14:06 |
xuhanp | sure. depends how to divide it. | 14:07 |
sc68cal | #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/70649/ | 14:07 |
xuhanp | we already tested the code. Most of it works, except the one pid problem. And I will file a bug for DHCP security rule to allow dhcpv6 from dnsmasq | 14:08 |
*** vivek-eb_ has quit IRC | 14:08 | |
sc68cal | xuhanp: Cool. I saw you had a patch get accepted yesterday to allow DHCPv6 solicit through? | 14:08 |
sc68cal | err - out of a guest | 14:08 |
*** balajiiyer has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:08 | |
xuhanp | yep. | 14:09 |
Shixiong | xuhanp, I am still investigating that pid problem | 14:09 |
*** yingjun has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:09 | |
*** balajiiyer has left #openstack-meeting | 14:09 | |
xuhanp | Shixiong, we also did some investigation on that. Can share with you if you need. | 14:09 |
xuhanp | I think we need to break your patch into smaller ones and submit for code review ASAP. | 14:09 |
xuhanp | give we are already at Juno-1 | 14:09 |
Shixiong | That will be awesome. | 14:10 |
Shixiong | Do you want to have a meeting to talk about that, or you think email exchange should be fine? | 14:10 |
xuhanp | I can talk with you after this meeting on openstack-neutron if that's OK | 14:10 |
*** KurtRao has quit IRC | 14:10 | |
*** eankutse has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:10 | |
*** KurtRao has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:11 | |
sc68cal | #link https://launchpad.net/neutron/+milestone/juno-1 J-1 milestone | 14:11 |
*** yingjun has quit IRC | 14:11 | |
sc68cal | #link https://launchpad.net/neutron/+milestone/juno-2 J-2 milestone | 14:11 |
*** maxdml has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:11 | |
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:11 | |
sc68cal | We've got a couple v6 BPs in both milestones | 14:11 |
aveiga | j1 is one week | 14:11 |
sc68cal | less than that :( | 14:12 |
sc68cal | I believe this thursday | 14:12 |
aveiga | 6/12 | 14:13 |
aveiga | according to the link | 14:13 |
*** vjay3 has quit IRC | 14:13 | |
sc68cal | xuhanp: Shixiong: baoli: Take a look at J-2 milestone, there's two IPv6 blueprints in for J-2 | 14:13 |
sc68cal | #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/dnsmasq-ipv6-slaac | 14:14 |
sc68cal | #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/neutron-ipv6-radvd-ra | 14:14 |
baoli | saw that. | 14:14 |
baoli | sc68scal, thanks for your review on my spec | 14:15 |
*** jdob has quit IRC | 14:15 | |
sc68cal | baoli: you're very kind to say so, since I -1'd it.. | 14:15 |
*** jdob has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:15 | |
sc68cal | During the main meeting yesterday we brought up the issue of the 1 attribute vs 2 attributes (see the los) | 14:16 |
sc68cal | *logs | 14:16 |
*** oomichi_ has quit IRC | 14:16 | |
baoli | sc68cal, is there a decision on that? | 14:16 |
*** lbragstad1 has quit IRC | 14:16 | |
sc68cal | There was only one dissenting opinion from the core team regarding 1 attr vs 2 attrs | 14:16 |
Shixiong | @xuhanp, I will have a meeting until noon today EST time. Is it possible we can chat at different time on the pid issue? | 14:17 |
sc68cal | this was in regards to getting the python-neutronclient change in | 14:17 |
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:17 | |
xuhanp | Shixiong, sure. | 14:17 |
sc68cal | baoli: I *think* that for the most part the 2 attr is the way we're going to go | 14:18 |
Shixiong | I prefer give you and Jian Li a call so we can talk, which is more efficient | 14:18 |
xuhanp | Shixiong, sure. | 14:18 |
xuhanp | that works too. | 14:18 |
baoli | sc68cal, what's the reason for my bp to be on the j2 list? | 14:18 |
sc68cal | baoli: the radvd one? | 14:19 |
baoli | sc68cal, yes | 14:19 |
sc68cal | Do you think it can be done by J-2? or should we move it to j-3? | 14:19 |
*** dhellmann has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:20 | |
*** flaviof_zzz is now known as flaviof | 14:20 | |
xuhanp | sc68cal, are we already decided to go to the "1" attribute one proposed by baoli? I saw your comment on that spec still objects it. | 14:20 |
*** sankarshan_away is now known as sankarshan | 14:21 | |
baoli | sc68cal, it's going to be a different implementation than what's currently being worked on. So schedule wise is not the concern for now | 14:21 |
*** kebray has quit IRC | 14:21 | |
sc68cal | xuhanp: No, we are still on the 2 attr track :) | 14:21 |
aveiga | baoli: what's different about it? | 14:22 |
baoli | aveiga, can you be more specific on your question? | 14:22 |
aveiga | it looks to me like that BP is for setting up radvd in the qrouter namespace to act as an RA daemon, and I fully support doing that | 14:22 |
Shixiong | xuhanp, I just sent you an email to your gmail account with proposed date. Please let me know if it works for you. | 14:22 |
xuhanp | Shixiong, got it. will reply | 14:22 |
baoli | aveiga, it's proposing one attribute in the subnet API. | 14:23 |
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:23 | |
aveiga | https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/neutron-ipv6-radvd-ra doesn't seem to propose any api changes | 14:23 |
*** trey_h has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:23 | |
*** kayaliu_ has quit IRC | 14:23 | |
sc68cal | Ah. I see the confusion | 14:24 |
aveiga | unless you meant a different BP | 14:24 |
*** kayaliu_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:24 | |
*** isviridov is now known as isviridov|away | 14:24 | |
sc68cal | Your Blueprint in LP talks about doing radvd and is a child of the two attributes BP | 14:24 |
sc68cal | but your spec in gerrit that you link to that bp is about the single attribute | 14:24 |
*** sushils_ has quit IRC | 14:24 | |
*** Michalik_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:25 | |
*** mwagner_lap has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:25 | |
baoli | sc68cal, sorry for the confusion. I probably should've started a new BP. | 14:25 |
aveiga | +1 to that, because the LP version is something I'd love to see | 14:25 |
aveiga | it would actually make my idea for ipv6 floats incredibly easy | 14:26 |
baoli | aveiga, does that mean that there will be implementation in openstack to support slaac? | 14:26 |
aveiga | of course | 14:26 |
baoli | sorry, two implemenation in openstack to support slaac | 14:26 |
aveiga | sure, and why not? It should be a config/build option to pick dnsmasq vs radvd | 14:26 |
aveiga | besides, I think we need unicast RA | 14:27 |
baoli | aveiga, I agree with you that with the RA, a lot of other things may become easier. | 14:27 |
*** vjay3 has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:27 | |
aveiga | unicast RA lets me add a float by just sending a new subnet advertisement to a single host :) | 14:27 |
aveiga | I'm writing a BP for this now, actually | 14:27 |
*** dkranz has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:28 | |
sc68cal | Yes, also if you have something slated for J-2, please make sure you have a spec in neutron-specs | 14:28 |
sc68cal | people are chomping at the bit to -1 and -2 stuff that does not have a spec in neutron-specs | 14:28 |
dane_leblanc | aveiga, if we're adding unicast RAs, that will impact the design spec I wrote for muliple prefixes per port | 14:29 |
aveiga | how does that implement selective prefix allocation? | 14:29 |
*** mspreitz has quit IRC | 14:29 | |
aveiga | I'd think it would actually be easier with unicast | 14:29 |
sc68cal | dane_leblanc: do you have a link for that spec? | 14:30 |
dane_leblanc | I was assuming SLAAC woudl be automatic... and not selective per port | 14:30 |
dane_leblanc | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/98217/ | 14:30 |
aveiga | oh, misunderstanding | 14:30 |
aveiga | slaac for the fixed would be multicast still | 14:30 |
*** hashar has quit IRC | 14:31 | |
aveiga | we would only unicast RAs for extra features, like floats or prefix delegation nodes | 14:31 |
dane_leblanc | aveiga, okay... was thinking differently about floating ips | 14:31 |
dane_leblanc | I was thinking floating IPs would only use DHCP. | 14:31 |
*** jdob_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:31 | |
*** jdob has quit IRC | 14:31 | |
aveiga | dane_leblanc: absolutely, buit the dhcpv6 solicit has to be initiated by RA still | 14:32 |
dane_leblanc | But your idea is less restrictive on admin | 14:32 |
aveiga | you either do this via unicasting RA's (easy) or filtering the multicasted RA to select hosts (harder, more state/config to track) | 14:32 |
sc68cal | baoli: What should we do about your launchpad blueprint, and the spec? | 14:33 |
baoli | sc68cal, I would create a new BP and link that to my spec. | 14:33 |
*** rkukura has left #openstack-meeting | 14:33 | |
dane_leblanc | aveiga, agreed, unicast RA's would be less complicated | 14:33 |
sc68cal | OK. So I assume that we should remove https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/neutron-ipv6-radvd-ra from the J-2 milestone | 14:34 |
*** thomasbiege1 has quit IRC | 14:34 | |
baoli | sc68cal, well I'd still like to see the new bps put in the j-2 | 14:34 |
*** cknight has left #openstack-meeting | 14:34 | |
sc68cal | baoli: you mean for the single attribute? | 14:34 |
aveiga | I'd like to see the radvd BP created as a -spec | 14:35 |
*** thomasbiege has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:35 | |
aveiga | either that or I'm going to file a bug against the dnsmasq implementation for not supporting unicast RA | 14:35 |
baoli | sc68cal, yes. it's for both single attr and radvd. Becasue I'm going to use radvd to implement it | 14:35 |
aveiga | baoli: can we split that? | 14:35 |
aveiga | one for the radvd implementation, and one for single that depends on radvd | 14:36 |
sc68cal | OK - so here's my concern. I already -1'd your spec for the single attribute saying that it'd kill momentum. Now we're removing a blueprint from J-2 for adding radvd, because you want to continue on this single attribute path | 14:36 |
baoli | aveiga, one attr doesn't depend on radvd. | 14:36 |
baoli | aveiga, it's the opposite | 14:36 |
aveiga | radvd doesn't depend on an api attribute | 14:37 |
*** doron_afk is now known as doron | 14:37 | |
*** jaypipes has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:37 | |
*** kgriffs|afk is now known as kgriffs | 14:38 | |
baoli | sc68cal, you seem to suggest in the review that use one attr in the CLI | 14:38 |
*** moha_hunt has quit IRC | 14:38 | |
baoli | So if one attr simplify the API, which is more important, I don't know the reason why we have to stick with the two attr. | 14:39 |
aveiga | baoli: the suggestion is that you could provide a method for using one attr in the cli if people feel that it's "too complicated" to use two | 14:39 |
*** jaypipes has quit IRC | 14:39 | |
aveiga | I am strongly against a signle api attribute, as I really need those knobs for finer grained configurations | 14:39 |
baoli | aveiga, any specific case that two attr can do but one attr can not? | 14:40 |
*** jaypipes has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:40 | |
*** elo2 has quit IRC | 14:40 | |
sc68cal | Let's take this off line | 14:40 |
aveiga | selectively toggling provider networks | 14:40 |
*** jgrimm has quit IRC | 14:40 | |
sc68cal | baoli: I asked you to send an e-mail to the mailing list about this last week, if I recall | 14:40 |
*** doron is now known as doron_afk | 14:40 | |
*** jdob_ is now known as jdob | 14:40 | |
baoli | sc68cal, sorry, did you ask me to send configuration on dual stack? | 14:41 |
*** jaypipes has quit IRC | 14:41 | |
sc68cal | I'd have to check the logs to be certain | 14:41 |
baoli | sc68cal, didn't get a chance to do that. But the devstack patch commit message pretty much described how to do that. | 14:41 |
*** jaypipes has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:42 | |
*** nelsnelson has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:42 | |
*** AlanClark has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:42 | |
*** yingjun has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:42 | |
sc68cal | I don't believe everyone is aware of the devstack patch, so it's always useful to start a thread on the ML and link things | 14:42 |
baoli | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/87987/ | 14:42 |
*** jeffrey4l has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:42 | |
*** BrianB___ has quit IRC | 14:44 | |
baoli | sc68cal, it will be on the review alias, if not on the developer alias | 14:44 |
*** trey_h has quit IRC | 14:44 | |
*** jaypipes has quit IRC | 14:44 | |
*** trey_h has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:45 | |
*** yaguang has quit IRC | 14:45 | |
baoli | aveiga, there is one value from my spec: provider_slaac, which excplicitly indicates provider net | 14:45 |
*** BrianB___ has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:45 | |
*** jgallard has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:45 | |
*** thedodd has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:45 | |
*** jaypipes has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:46 | |
baoli | aveiga, that should cover the use case you guys are working on. | 14:46 |
sc68cal | Shixiong: xuhanp: So I think for now we have only one BP that is slated for j-2 | 14:46 |
sc68cal | https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/dnsmasq-ipv6-slaac | 14:46 |
sc68cal | Do you need help creating a spec for it in neutron-specs? | 14:46 |
Shixiong | Maybe this should be the one we focus on | 14:46 |
*** ominakov has quit IRC | 14:47 | |
*** xianghui has quit IRC | 14:47 | |
xuhanp | Shixiong, do you have plan to do that? I can certainly help if you need | 14:47 |
*** sushils_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:47 | |
Shixiong | I am not sure what I need to do...to be honest.... | 14:47 |
Shixiong | "creating a spec for it in neutron-specs"? | 14:47 |
*** yingjun has quit IRC | 14:47 | |
xuhanp | We need to create a new code review in neutron-specs project | 14:48 |
sc68cal | I agree - plus I did some of the legwork for you, the patch for provider-nets slaac checks for constants.DHCPV6_STATELESS and does an eui64 address calculation, so I think the API is all set, we just need to do the dnsmasq piece | 14:48 |
*** jmontemayor has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:48 | |
*** trey_h_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:48 | |
*** trey_h_ has quit IRC | 14:48 | |
sc68cal | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/86044/7/neutron/db/db_base_plugin_v2.py | 14:48 |
xuhanp | sc68cal, yep. that one is based on dazhao's patch, right? | 14:48 |
*** jmontemayor has quit IRC | 14:48 | |
xuhanp | I have some memory on that one. | 14:49 |
*** sushils_ has quit IRC | 14:49 | |
*** sushils__ has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:49 | |
*** trey_h_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:49 | |
xuhanp | Shixiong, I can help on the spec create if you are not familiar with that. and we can talk about how to speed up the dnsmasq code in our talk this week. | 14:49 |
xuhanp | if we are OK with that. | 14:50 |
Shixiong | Yup, that will definitely help. | 14:50 |
*** jmontemayor has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:50 | |
Shixiong | Thanks, Xuhan! | 14:50 |
xuhanp | Shixiong, welcome | 14:50 |
*** trey_h has quit IRC | 14:50 | |
sc68cal | xuhanp: yup | 14:52 |
*** ominakov has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:54 | |
*** reed has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:54 | |
*** ominakov has quit IRC | 14:54 | |
*** Macaveli has quit IRC | 14:55 | |
sc68cal | Does the ipv6-radvd-ra blueprint depend on the single attribute? I don't think it does | 14:55 |
sc68cal | so I'd like to sign someone up for the work, or else it's going to get moved out of J-2 | 14:55 |
baoli | sc68cal, it talks about RA support in neutron | 14:55 |
baoli | and the supporting implementation will be using radvd | 14:55 |
sc68cal | yes, but it was a child of the two attribute blueprint | 14:55 |
sc68cal | in launchpad | 14:56 |
sc68cal | which meant that it was going to use the two attribute changes to the API | 14:56 |
*** afazekas has quit IRC | 14:56 | |
sc68cal | I believe your neutron-spec review needed to link to a new blueprint in launchpad | 14:56 |
sc68cal | since that was an API change | 14:56 |
*** isviridov|away is now known as isviridov | 14:56 | |
sc68cal | I'm sorry I didn't catch it sooner | 14:56 |
baoli | sc68cal, i didn't realize until today. Thanks for that. So I'm going to create a new BP and link the spec to the new BP | 14:57 |
*** otherwiseguy has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:57 | |
*** cjellick has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:57 | |
*** cjellick has quit IRC | 14:57 | |
*** cjellick has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:58 | |
*** mspreitz has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:58 | |
sc68cal | OK, then I'm going to ask cores to move the radvd blueprint out of J-2 unless we have someoneone who wants to work on it | 14:58 |
aveiga | it needs a -spec first | 14:59 |
sc68cal | indeed | 14:59 |
aveiga | I guess I can work on the spec, but there's no way I'd be able to implement it | 14:59 |
*** gokrokve has quit IRC | 14:59 | |
sc68cal | OK, well that's all we have time for | 15:00 |
sc68cal | see everyone next week, let's start some threads on the ML | 15:00 |
*** Michalik_ has quit IRC | 15:00 | |
sc68cal | #endmeeting | 15:00 |
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings" | 15:00 | |
openstack | Meeting ended Tue Jun 10 15:00:29 2014 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 15:00 |
openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_ipv6/2014/neutron_ipv6.2014-06-10-14.00.html | 15:00 |
openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_ipv6/2014/neutron_ipv6.2014-06-10-14.00.txt | 15:00 |
openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_ipv6/2014/neutron_ipv6.2014-06-10-14.00.log.html | 15:00 |
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:00 | |
*** Shixiong has quit IRC | 15:00 | |
n0ano | #startmeeting gantt | 15:01 |
*** eankutse1 has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:01 | |
openstack | Meeting started Tue Jun 10 15:01:11 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is n0ano. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 15:01 |
openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 15:01 |
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: gantt)" | 15:01 | |
openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'gantt' | 15:01 |
*** aveiga has left #openstack-meeting | 15:01 | |
* n0ano is hopefully using the right window this week :-) | 15:01 | |
n0ano | anyone here to talk about the scheduler? | 15:01 |
mspreitz | yes | 15:01 |
*** PaulMurray has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:01 | |
*** jcoufal has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:01 | |
*** hashar has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:02 | |
toan-tran | yes | 15:02 |
*** tianst has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:02 | |
*** idegtiarov has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:02 | |
*** jcoufal has quit IRC | 15:02 | |
*** giustoXricordarv has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:02 | |
*** doron_afk is now known as doron | 15:03 | |
*** eankutse has quit IRC | 15:03 | |
n0ano | bauzas won't be here today (traveling) but I got a status from him | 15:03 |
*** johnpur has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:03 | |
n0ano | #topic code forklift | 15:03 |
*** openstack changes topic to "code forklift (Meeting topic: gantt)" | 15:03 | |
*** jcoufal has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:03 | |
*** Michalik_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:03 | |
n0ano | he had to address issues related to object model support and miss use of some DB fields but the patches for the scheduler-lib are here: | 15:04 |
*** johnpur has left #openstack-meeting | 15:04 | |
n0ano | https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/nova+branch:master+topic:bp/scheduler-lib,n,z | 15:04 |
*** xianghui has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:04 | |
*** ihrachyshka has quit IRC | 15:04 | |
n0ano | #action all to review the scheduler-lib patches | 15:04 |
*** HenryG has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:04 | |
n0ano | I did find some people to work on the isolate scheduler DB access BP so we should get some action on that | 15:05 |
n0ano | other than that, I think the forklift is basically work in progress | 15:05 |
n0ano | if no questions on that... | 15:06 |
*** jtomasek has quit IRC | 15:06 | |
n0ano | #topic no-db scheduler | 15:06 |
*** openstack changes topic to "no-db scheduler (Meeting topic: gantt)" | 15:06 | |
*** vkmc has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:06 | |
*** vkmc has quit IRC | 15:06 | |
*** vkmc has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:06 | |
n0ano | I noticed that yorik (doesn't appear to be online today) abandoned the patch for the no-db work | 15:07 |
n0ano | I wanted to talk to him about that as I don't think we wanted to just give up on it | 15:07 |
toan-tran | n0ano: I hope that's not because of last week | 15:07 |
n0ano | toan-tran, agreed | 15:07 |
*** vjay3 has quit IRC | 15:08 | |
n0ano | I'll ping him on email and see if I can get an explanation, hopefully he is just looking at different ways to implement things | 15:08 |
*** vjay4 has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:08 | |
*** ildikov_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:08 | |
n0ano | anyway... | 15:08 |
n0ano | #topic policy based scheduler | 15:08 |
*** marun has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:08 | |
*** openstack changes topic to "policy based scheduler (Meeting topic: gantt)" | 15:08 | |
n0ano | toan-tran, I believe this is your issue | 15:08 |
toan-tran | n0ano: thanks | 15:09 |
*** ildikov has quit IRC | 15:09 | |
toan-tran | Here is the bp: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/policy-based-scheduler | 15:09 |
toan-tran | and its specs: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/97503/2 | 15:09 |
toan-tran | the idea is to be able to control scheduling decision process by policy | 15:10 |
toan-tran | currently what're we're doing is to put a list of Filters, Weighers and parameters into nova.conf | 15:10 |
toan-tran | all of these Filters & Weighers will be applied to ALL requests from ALL clients on ALL hosts | 15:10 |
*** dane_leblanc has quit IRC | 15:11 | |
toan-tran | imagin if we need 2 policies: | 15:11 |
toan-tran | LoadBalancing for overall infrastructure | 15:11 |
*** dane_leblanc has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:11 | |
*** doron is now known as doron_afk | 15:12 | |
toan-tran | and Consolidation (regrouping hosts) in an aggregate | 15:12 |
toan-tran | that's simply impossible | 15:12 |
mspreitz | I'm not sure I understand your use case | 15:12 |
toan-tran | FYI, we have this usecase at Cloudwatt | 15:12 |
toan-tran | :) | 15:12 |
mspreitz | what do you mean by "overall infrastructure", how is that different from an aggregate? | 15:12 |
toan-tran | it's Windows licence :) | 15:12 |
toan-tran | Microsoft charges Windows licence by physical hosts | 15:13 |
*** jpeeler has quit IRC | 15:13 | |
mspreitz | so placement matters | 15:13 |
toan-tran | thus it's important that we can regroup Windows VM in minimal of hosts | 15:13 |
toan-tran | ==> Consolidation | 15:13 |
mspreitz | I do not understand why you are framing this as an issue for all VMs. Shouldn't it be a policy issue for the VMs with Windows licenses whose cost you want to minimize? | 15:14 |
PaulMurray | toan-tran do you stack windows? | 15:14 |
n0ano | toan-tran, devil's advocate here, wouldn't that just be a slightly more complex weighting funcitno | 15:14 |
toan-tran | however, we still need the global Load Balancing in all infrastructure, so that other VMs will be distributed evenly | 15:14 |
*** ominakov has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:14 | |
toan-tran | PaulMurray: yes | 15:14 |
*** zhangleiqiang has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:15 | |
toan-tran | mspreitz: it's one of the usecases | 15:15 |
PaulMurray | toan-tran, very familiar... :) | 15:15 |
PaulMurray | toan-tran, we do it with filter scheduler | 15:15 |
PaulMurray | toan-tran, whats the problem? | 15:15 |
toan-tran | n0ano: yes this usecase is feasible with another wiegher | 15:15 |
*** jcoufal has quit IRC | 15:15 | |
mspreitz | The big picture thing that confuses me is that the blueprint talks about making distinctions per client, but the solution is not so structured | 15:15 |
PaulMurray | toan-tran, not saying it cant be better... | 15:15 |
toan-tran | the thing is more general | 15:15 |
*** mberlin has quit IRC | 15:16 | |
toan-tran | we have only ONE global policy for all requests , all users, all clusters of hosts | 15:16 |
toan-tran | what we're proposing is a seperation between scheduling logic from its application domain | 15:16 |
toan-tran | scheduling logic = how do you want to schedule the requested resources | 15:17 |
*** mberlin has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:17 | |
toan-tran | application demain = where you want to execute this logic | 15:17 |
*** dprince has quit IRC | 15:17 | |
toan-tran | another example then : :) | 15:17 |
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:17 | |
*** YorikSar has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:18 | |
toan-tran | 2 users signs 2 different contracts | 15:18 |
*** markwash has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:18 | |
toan-tran | one with gold quality (high quality equipments) , another with trial (low quality equipments) | 15:18 |
*** belmoreira has quit IRC | 15:19 | |
toan-tran | with Filter Scheduler, you probably create 2 flavors and put metadata on them and give users the rights to use it | 15:19 |
YorikSar | n0ano: Sorry for being late. We can get back to no-db topic once we're finished with other topics. | 15:19 |
n0ano | YorikSar, tnx, will do | 15:19 |
toan-tran | the problem is that : | 15:20 |
toan-tran | it's not transparent to users: he has to explicitly choose the right flavor | 15:20 |
*** matiu has quit IRC | 15:20 | |
*** elo has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:20 | |
toan-tran | imagine that the trial user is now satisfied with the trial and decide to go for gold contract | 15:20 |
toan-tran | then he has to change his entire application to call for the gold flavor | 15:21 |
*** vkmc has quit IRC | 15:21 | |
mspreitz | huh? | 15:21 |
mspreitz | How much of a change is that really? | 15:21 |
n0ano | toan-tran, he just has to change the flavor requested, that doesn't seem like such a big deal | 15:21 |
toan-tran | mspreitz: well, it's not tranparent | 15:22 |
mspreitz | The contract quality is inherently visible to the cloud user | 15:22 |
mspreitz | one way or another | 15:22 |
n0ano | toan-tran, not sure it should be transparent, he's changing what he will be billed, he should be aware of that | 15:22 |
toan-tran | mspreitz: but technically it is not managed by client, but by cloud provider | 15:23 |
mspreitz | What n0ano said | 15:23 |
toan-tran | n0ano: he will be billed by his contract, | 15:23 |
*** peoplemerge1 has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:24 | |
toan-tran | yes | 15:24 |
n0ano | I would imaging that cloud provider has two host aggregates, one gold & one bronze, users can use flavor to select the price/performance the user wants | 15:24 |
*** atiwari has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:24 | |
toan-tran | but he does not need to verify his flavors | 15:24 |
*** jcoufal has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:24 | |
toan-tran | n0ano: we do, actually, have several aggrs with associated flavors for customers to choose | 15:25 |
mspreitz | I am very confused. This example is about the very kind of stuff that flavors are about | 15:25 |
mspreitz | well, that's a bit of an overstatement, but you get the idea | 15:25 |
toan-tran | mspreitz: the problem is that right now customers have to select the right flavors | 15:25 |
*** xuhanp has quit IRC | 15:25 | |
toan-tran | and we want to leverage from customers | 15:26 |
mspreitz | Yes, flavors are based on considerations that are user visible | 15:26 |
toan-tran | to manage the whole deployment process from cloud provider's end | 15:26 |
n0ano | toan-tran, I think your policy based scheduling might have merit but we really don't see a good use case for it yet | 15:26 |
mspreitz | From the user's point of view, flavors are nothing but an unwelcome pain. They are there to make the providing easier. | 15:26 |
*** annegentle_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:26 | |
toan-tran | mspreitz: exactly | 15:27 |
mspreitz | OK, let me try to buck him up | 15:27 |
mspreitz | I can imagine use cases | 15:27 |
mspreitz | toan-tran may not remember my history here, but I came in with similar issues | 15:27 |
toan-tran | mspreitz: go ahead | 15:27 |
mspreitz | In fact, my group worked an example in 2012 where we deployed VMs running IBM software whose license cost also depends on placement | 15:27 |
*** jgrimm has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:28 | |
mspreitz | we put a policy statement on those VMs that created a preference for co-location. | 15:28 |
mspreitz | A somewhat precise preference, in terms of licensing. | 15:28 |
mspreitz | In the same example we also had some anti-colocation constraints for reliability | 15:28 |
*** changbl has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:29 | |
*** kayaliu_ has quit IRC | 15:29 | |
*** vkmc has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:29 | |
mspreitz | And used logic that threw in some preference for minimzing network usage. | 15:29 |
*** tianst has quit IRC | 15:29 | |
mspreitz | A reasonable thing if you are deploying, say, a three tier web application. | 15:29 |
mspreitz | But we took a little different tack... | 15:29 |
mspreitz | We let there be policy statements in the input, attached precisely to groups of VMs and between them. | 15:30 |
*** jeffrey4l has quit IRC | 15:30 | |
*** nshaikh has quit IRC | 15:30 | |
mspreitz | our solution transformed the input to a constrained optimization problem and solved that to get the placement. | 15:30 |
mspreitz | You may know that some others guys from Cisco and VMware are advocating this approach | 15:30 |
mspreitz | as well | 15:31 |
toan-tran | SolverScheduler you mean | 15:31 |
mspreitz | yes | 15:31 |
*** gyee has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:31 | |
toan-tran | I have done some analysis on that: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RfP7jRsw1mXMjd7in72ARjK0fTrsQv1bqolOriIQB2Y/edit?usp=drive_web | 15:32 |
*** thedodd has quit IRC | 15:32 | |
toan-tran | SolverScheduler needs a bunch of contraints as input | 15:32 |
toan-tran | and PolicyBasedScheduler can get these constraints | 15:32 |
toan-tran | actually the constraint will be what the policy rules dictate | 15:33 |
mspreitz | Yes, I saw that analysis, and was not as alarmed by it as by the remarks in the blueprint | 15:33 |
n0ano | time check, I want to talk about no-db and have an open, do we have an end goal for this discussion? | 15:33 |
mspreitz | If your intent is what you outline in that analysis, I may be able to live with it | 15:33 |
mspreitz | n0ano: i'm happy to stop here and do some more reading and thinking | 15:34 |
toan-tran | mspreitz: oh, I have intention to develop it into a more ambitious than that :) | 15:34 |
toan-tran | the first step is to have an policy based scheduling engine | 15:34 |
*** thedodd has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:34 | |
toan-tran | then (much much) later it can incorprate with Tetris & Congress | 15:34 |
n0ano | toan-tran, but first you have to get by the objections to the current BP :-) | 15:35 |
toan-tran | so that we can have a scheduling engin inside Gantt to be able to controlscheduling from intial placement to life-cycle | 15:35 |
toan-tran | n0ano: that's right :D | 15:35 |
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:35 | |
toan-tran | I tries my best to present something simple in nova first | 15:36 |
n0ano | toan-tran, note, you have to refresh your BP, it's about to get dropped right now | 15:36 |
toan-tran | n0ano: what do you mean? | 15:36 |
*** idegtiarov has quit IRC | 15:36 | |
n0ano | last message - code review expired after 1 week of no activity after a negative review, it can be restored using the `Restore Change` button under the Patch Set on the web interface | 15:37 |
*** kayaliu_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:37 | |
toan-tran | n0ano: ok :) | 15:37 |
n0ano | anyway, moving on... | 15:37 |
n0ano | #topic no-db scheduler | 15:37 |
*** openstack changes topic to "no-db scheduler (Meeting topic: gantt)" | 15:37 | |
n0ano | YorikSar, you still here? | 15:38 |
YorikSar | n0ano: Yep | 15:38 |
n0ano | I see you abandoned the current patch, I hope that just means you thinking how to do it and not giving up | 15:38 |
YorikSar | I've written my reasons in the comment to change request in the spec repo | 15:38 |
*** Longgeek has quit IRC | 15:39 | |
mspreitz | link? | 15:39 |
YorikSar | Nope, I think it's just a premature optimization that shouldn't be implemented right away. | 15:39 |
YorikSar | #link https://review.openstack.org/92128 | 15:39 |
YorikSar | There are other options that hasn't been considered. | 15:39 |
*** edmund has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:39 | |
n0ano | good, I agree, just so that we don't give up completely | 15:40 |
YorikSar | And there's nothing to write in "Problem statement" section. | 15:40 |
*** jpeeler has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:40 | |
YorikSar | So I guess this effort might be revived once Gantt faces performance issues related to DB, but for now it should be left alone. | 15:40 |
n0ano | I thought this all started with the performance issues with a Bluehost 10,000 node system, I would think those performance issues reamain | 15:41 |
n0ano | s/reamain/remain | 15:41 |
*** Leonr has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:41 | |
YorikSar | There have been a lot of work done under aegis of no-db-scheduler blueprint (even before it has been created). | 15:41 |
*** sushils__ has quit IRC | 15:41 | |
*** nkubota has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:41 | |
YorikSar | They should be verified. One hug performance bottleneck has been eliminated - separate key-value table for host states. | 15:42 |
YorikSar | *huge | 15:42 |
n0ano | that required a join operation, right? | 15:42 |
YorikSar | Yes | 15:42 |
*** nacim has quit IRC | 15:43 | |
YorikSar | And all cool documents-reports has been written before that has been done. | 15:43 |
mspreitz | And it has been experimentally verified that those joins cost less than the stuff that was eliminated? | 15:43 |
YorikSar | mspreitz: Yes... | 15:43 |
*** sushils_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:44 | |
YorikSar | I'm talking about changes that happened last summer iirc | 15:44 |
mspreitz | thanks | 15:44 |
*** BrianB___ has quit IRC | 15:44 | |
*** changbl has quit IRC | 15:44 | |
*** Michalik_ has quit IRC | 15:45 | |
n0ano | so, to summarize, this is really a performance optimization issue and we want to make sure we are addressing the right problem | 15:45 |
YorikSar | So now I suggest to focus on more pressing issues like separating Gantt and polishing its API and come back to performance once it becomes a problem. | 15:45 |
n0ano | YorikSar, +1 | 15:46 |
YorikSar | n0ano: Yes | 15:46 |
*** eankutse1 has quit IRC | 15:46 | |
*** eankutse has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:46 | |
n0ano | OK, sounds like a plan | 15:46 |
toan-tran | YorikSar: I think the problem is always there, but I agree that we can address no db once Gantt is materalized | 15:46 |
YorikSar | toan-tran: It's speculated that it should become a real problem at 10k+ nodes. | 15:47 |
YorikSar | toan-tran: So I wouldn't say it's there. It might be. | 15:47 |
n0ano | moving on... | 15:48 |
YorikSar | toan-tran: I mean it definitelly was there, but in current state of Nova it might be already gone. | 15:48 |
n0ano | #topic opens | 15:48 |
*** openstack changes topic to "opens (Meeting topic: gantt)" | 15:48 | |
n0ano | based upon last weeks discussion I've created a BP to optimize the status reporting from compute nodes | 15:49 |
n0ano | #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/97903/ | 15:49 |
*** egallen has quit IRC | 15:49 | |
n0ano | basic idea is, rather that update the DB every minute, only update the DB when the status changes | 15:49 |
mspreitz | some folks were talking about status that changes every time, like CPU utilization. So I am confused. | 15:49 |
*** Michalik_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:49 | |
n0ano | cpu utilization is not currently reported so that will be a future issue | 15:50 |
mspreitz | same for memory? | 15:50 |
toan-tran | mspreitz: cpu utilization is utilisation-aware | 15:50 |
mspreitz | ? | 15:50 |
toan-tran | not on this period update | 15:50 |
mspreitz | toan-tran: what do you mean by "cpu utilization is utilisation-aware" ? | 15:51 |
n0ano | mspreitz, interesting point, turns out I think there's a bug in the current memory reporting, it doesn't report used memory... | 15:51 |
n0ano | it only reports memory used by instances | 15:51 |
toan-tran | mspreitz: period update does not update cpu utilisation if i'm not wrong | 15:51 |
mspreitz | Well, actually, I think we should focus first on allocated memory rather than used memory | 15:51 |
n0ano | toan-tran, +1 | 15:51 |
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:51 | |
PaulMurray | n0ano, the discussion I remember talked about calculating regularly but only updating if it changed | 15:51 |
n0ano | PaulMurray, that's what I do with the current reporting mechanism | 15:52 |
*** elo has quit IRC | 15:52 | |
mspreitz | by which I think I may mean what n0ano said: focus on how much memory is dedicated to instances | 15:52 |
PaulMurray | n0ano, so does this change that reporting? | 15:52 |
n0ano | mspreitz, but that's not a true indication of `node` resources, if many other processes are using memory you might not want to schedule onto that node | 15:53 |
*** Fdot_ has quit IRC | 15:53 | |
*** paulbc has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:53 | |
mspreitz | yeah, if you really want a compute node doing other things too, then you have to account for them | 15:54 |
*** sushils_ has quit IRC | 15:54 | |
*** doron_afk has quit IRC | 15:54 | |
n0ano | which it is currently not doing, I'll raise that issue on the mailing list and see what peope think | 15:54 |
mspreitz | and you have to account for broken compute-node business too (e.g., half-deleted VMs) | 15:54 |
*** nedbat_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:54 | |
n0ano | you could argue both ways (we only care about instance usage vs. node usage), I don't know what people really want | 15:55 |
PaulMurray | n0ano, actually we want to know what is left available | 15:55 |
PaulMurray | n0ano, imo | 15:55 |
n0ano | which is not what is currently being reported | 15:55 |
mspreitz | What I would really like is to count memory allocated to instances + all other memory usage, compare with memory capacity | 15:55 |
n0ano | mspreitz, +1 | 15:56 |
mspreitz | But let me revise that after a second's reconsideration... | 15:56 |
toan-tran | mspreitz: I'm not sure if the current period update count on allocated mem to instances | 15:57 |
mspreitz | if the non-instance usage is arbitrarily dynamic, you could get into over-use | 15:57 |
n0ano | that is my preference but I see it rather simplistic, report free memory (no matter what the occupied memory is used for) | 15:57 |
n0ano | mspreitz, ? | 15:57 |
*** IvanBerezovskiy has left #openstack-meeting | 15:57 | |
mspreitz | Suppose you allocate all available memory now, and then some non-instance process wants even more? | 15:57 |
n0ano | linux handles that | 15:58 |
PaulMurray | mspreitz, some hypervisors use memory in addition to the instance allocation | 15:58 |
n0ano | PaulMurray, all the more reason to report true memory usage | 15:58 |
mspreitz | You really want allocations such that the users can be relied on to not exceed them. We rarely want to actually use the host's virtual memory, we want to stay in physical memory | 15:58 |
*** paulmo has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:58 | |
*** nedbat has quit IRC | 15:58 | |
*** markwash has quit IRC | 15:58 | |
PaulMurray | n0ano, yes, agreed | 15:59 |
mspreitz | I am presuming that the overheads due to being a compute node can be reasonably characterized | 15:59 |
*** julim has quit IRC | 15:59 | |
n0ano | we're running out of time, I suggest everyone comment on my BP and respond to the email thread that I start | 16:00 |
n0ano | so, top of the hour, tnx everyone and we'll talk again next week | 16:00 |
*** Leon has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:00 | |
n0ano | #endmeeting | 16:00 |
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings" | 16:00 | |
*** phil__ has quit IRC | 16:00 | |
openstack | Meeting ended Tue Jun 10 16:00:47 2014 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 16:00 |
openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/gantt/2014/gantt.2014-06-10-15.01.html | 16:00 |
openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/gantt/2014/gantt.2014-06-10-15.01.txt | 16:00 |
*** nlahouti__ has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:00 | |
openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/gantt/2014/gantt.2014-06-10-15.01.log.html | 16:00 |
*** Leon is now known as Guest26452 | 16:01 | |
*** nlahouti__ has quit IRC | 16:01 | |
*** terryw has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:01 | |
*** coolsvap|afk is now known as coolsvap | 16:01 | |
*** MaxV has quit IRC | 16:01 | |
*** otherwiseguy has quit IRC | 16:01 | |
*** egallen has quit IRC | 16:02 | |
*** julim has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:02 | |
*** peoplemerge1 has quit IRC | 16:03 | |
*** Leonr has quit IRC | 16:03 | |
*** pballand has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:03 | |
*** pballand has quit IRC | 16:03 | |
*** emagana has quit IRC | 16:04 | |
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:04 | |
*** paulbc has left #openstack-meeting | 16:04 | |
*** hemna has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:04 | |
*** luis_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:05 | |
*** vjay4 has quit IRC | 16:05 | |
*** otherwiseguy has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:06 | |
*** kayaliu_ has quit IRC | 16:06 | |
*** alexpilotti_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:07 | |
*** jgrimm has quit IRC | 16:07 | |
*** markwash has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:07 | |
*** marcoemorais has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:08 | |
*** ramishra has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:09 | |
*** emagana has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:10 | |
*** terryw has quit IRC | 16:10 | |
*** annegentle_ has quit IRC | 16:10 | |
*** luis_ has quit IRC | 16:11 | |
*** alexpilotti_ has quit IRC | 16:12 | |
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:12 | |
*** evgenyf has quit IRC | 16:13 | |
*** annegent_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:14 | |
*** cath6184 has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:14 | |
*** julienvey has quit IRC | 16:14 | |
*** zhangleiqiang has quit IRC | 16:16 | |
*** paulmo has left #openstack-meeting | 16:16 | |
*** jackib has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:16 | |
*** shakayumi is now known as shakayumi_afk | 16:17 | |
*** shakayumi_afk has quit IRC | 16:19 | |
*** jaypipes has quit IRC | 16:20 | |
*** Michalik_ has quit IRC | 16:20 | |
*** jgallard has quit IRC | 16:22 | |
*** SridarK has quit IRC | 16:24 | |
*** jackib has quit IRC | 16:25 | |
*** bgorski has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:25 | |
*** thomasbiege1 has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:25 | |
*** luqas has quit IRC | 16:25 | |
*** dprince has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:26 | |
*** thomasbiege has quit IRC | 16:26 | |
*** marcoemorais has quit IRC | 16:27 | |
*** marcoemorais has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:27 | |
*** denis_makogon_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:27 | |
*** marcoemorais has quit IRC | 16:28 | |
*** marcoemorais has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:29 | |
*** marcoemorais has quit IRC | 16:29 | |
*** richm has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:29 | |
*** ihrachyshka has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:29 | |
*** marcoemorais has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:29 | |
*** jgrimm has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:29 | |
*** thomasbiege has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:30 | |
*** thomasbiege1 has quit IRC | 16:30 | |
*** thomasbiege has quit IRC | 16:31 | |
*** toan-tran has quit IRC | 16:33 | |
*** jaypipes has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:33 | |
*** annegent_ is now known as annegentle_ | 16:34 | |
*** mdml has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:34 | |
*** vuil has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:35 | |
*** xianghui has quit IRC | 16:35 | |
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:36 | |
*** maxdml has quit IRC | 16:37 | |
*** igordcard has quit IRC | 16:39 | |
*** isviridov is now known as isviridov|away | 16:40 | |
*** gokrokve_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:40 | |
*** vivek-ebay has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:40 | |
*** emaganap has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:41 | |
*** emagana has quit IRC | 16:43 | |
*** gokrokve has quit IRC | 16:43 | |
*** luis_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:45 | |
*** ramashri has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:46 | |
*** mwagner_lap has quit IRC | 16:48 | |
*** caleb_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:48 | |
*** mtanino has quit IRC | 16:49 | |
*** dkranz has quit IRC | 16:49 | |
*** Michalik_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:49 | |
*** k4n0 has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:50 | |
*** s3wong has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:50 | |
*** changbl has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:50 | |
*** yogeshmehra has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:51 | |
*** thinrichs has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:51 | |
*** hashar has quit IRC | 16:54 | |
*** jcoufal has quit IRC | 16:55 | |
*** pcm_ has left #openstack-meeting | 16:55 | |
*** emaganap has quit IRC | 16:56 | |
*** _nadya__ has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:56 | |
*** luis_ has quit IRC | 16:57 | |
*** emagana has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:57 | |
*** trey_h_ has quit IRC | 16:57 | |
boris-42 | #startmeeting rally | 16:59 |
openstack | Meeting started Tue Jun 10 16:59:27 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is boris-42. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 16:59 |
openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 16:59 |
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: rally)" | 16:59 | |
openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'rally' | 16:59 |
boris-42 | msdubov ping | 16:59 |
coolsvap | hello | 16:59 |
boris-42 | coolsvap Hi there | 16:59 |
boris-42 | hughsaunders ping | 16:59 |
k4n0 | o/ | 16:59 |
msdubov | boris-42 Hi! | 16:59 |
*** denis_makogon_ is now known as denis_makogon | 17:00 | |
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC | 17:00 | |
*** tkay has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:00 | |
*** amaretskiy has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:01 | |
*** klindgren_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:01 | |
*** kun_huang has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:01 | |
*** rediskin has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:02 | |
boris-42 | kun_huang rediskin klindgren_ glad to see u | 17:02 |
*** olkonami has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:02 | |
boris-42 | #topic rally docs | 17:02 |
*** openstack changes topic to "rally docs (Meeting topic: rally)" | 17:02 | |
kun_huang | boris-42 :) | 17:02 |
boris-42 | msdubov share with others what is the current state of it | 17:02 |
*** julim has quit IRC | 17:03 | |
*** cath6184 has quit IRC | 17:03 | |
msdubov | boris-42 So I'm currently transcribing the docs to the .rst format, to push it to readthedocs | 17:03 |
msdubov | I'll publish a corresponding patch today or tomorrow | 17:04 |
*** weshay has quit IRC | 17:04 | |
msdubov | Further work is to extend the docs with new texts | 17:04 |
*** weshay has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:04 | |
*** egallen has quit IRC | 17:04 | |
msdubov | And also restructure the docstrings in code | 17:04 |
msdubov | So that we can easily implement the "rally info" command | 17:04 |
msdubov | Basically that's the plan | 17:05 |
*** blogan has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:05 | |
msdubov | Hope somebody will help me with that ;) | 17:05 |
*** rockyg has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:05 | |
*** thomasbiege has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:05 | |
kun_huang | boris-42 msdubov I'm glad to do that; actually I need join you back | 17:06 |
boris-42 | kun_huang yep we are missing you imho | 17:07 |
boris-42 | #topic rally info | 17:08 |
*** openstack changes topic to "rally info (Meeting topic: rally)" | 17:08 | |
boris-42 | As there is a lot of new members | 17:08 |
*** harlowja_away is now known as harlowja | 17:08 | |
boris-42 | could you explain idea of it msdubov ? | 17:08 |
boris-42 | and share with others that document | 17:08 |
msdubov | boris-42 Yep, sure, wait a bit | 17:08 |
msdubov | So first the idea: | 17:09 |
*** jackib has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:09 | |
msdubov | The 'rally info' command should serve as a helping system built-in in the CLI | 17:09 |
msdubov | For example you can write "rally info contexts" and get the overall description of what the contexts in Rally are for | 17:10 |
msdubov | Or "rally info NovaServers.boot_server" => Info about that specific benchmark scenario | 17:10 |
msdubov | And that info should be retrieved automatically from the docstrings (at least the most of it) | 17:11 |
msdubov | Here is the link: https://docs.google.com/a/mirantis.com/document/d/1m4HqrbWOfcvi-LKjehJZTeYX1p-TzXeUvfIHhyU9nOI/edit#heading=h.zh97w9nib534 | 17:11 |
msdubov | The doc contains an overview of what the "rally info" will look like | 17:11 |
hughsaunders | hey | 17:11 |
boris-42 | klindgren_ k4n0 coolsvap ^ anybody interested ? | 17:11 |
msdubov | And also in p.5, there is a work plan | 17:11 |
boris-42 | hughsaunders hey hey=) | 17:12 |
coolsvap | boris-42: I am already working on one of the CLI, I can have work with msdubov | 17:12 |
coolsvap | reading the doc | 17:12 |
boris-42 | coolsvap yep that will be great | 17:13 |
*** ngoswami has quit IRC | 17:13 | |
*** VijayB has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:13 | |
kun_huang | msdubov good cmd; are there some first commits? | 17:13 |
*** VijayB has quit IRC | 17:14 | |
*** VijayB has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:14 | |
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:14 | |
*** VijayB has quit IRC | 17:14 | |
msdubov | kun_huang, No commits for the "rally info" command but there is currently some work on improving the docstrings (e.g. that patch with rst docs mentioned above) | 17:14 |
*** derekh_ has quit IRC | 17:15 | |
*** VijayB_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:15 | |
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:15 | |
*** egallen has quit IRC | 17:16 | |
coolsvap | msdubov: okay | 17:17 |
*** paragan has quit IRC | 17:17 | |
*** VijayB has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:17 | |
*** vrovachev has quit IRC | 17:17 | |
boris-42 | #topic Functional testing | 17:18 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Functional testing (Meeting topic: rally)" | 17:18 | |
boris-42 | rediskin pls provide in verbose mode what you are doing | 17:19 |
*** jgrimm has quit IRC | 17:19 | |
*** HenryG has quit IRC | 17:19 | |
rediskin | here is blueprint https://blueprints.launchpad.net/rally/+spec/tests-integrated | 17:19 |
*** balajiiyer has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:19 | |
*** VijayB_ has quit IRC | 17:19 | |
rediskin | one helper function and one test is done :) | 17:20 |
*** mspreitz has quit IRC | 17:20 | |
rediskin | https://review.openstack.org/85738 | 17:20 |
*** HenryG has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:20 | |
*** jackib has quit IRC | 17:20 | |
*** otherwiseguy has quit IRC | 17:20 | |
* boris-42 ^ that was super verbose mode of rediskin lol=) | 17:20 | |
rediskin | as you can see in work items, next step is command's output format | 17:20 |
*** VijayB has quit IRC | 17:21 | |
rediskin | test results you can see in jenkins's comment for every patch (curreenlty last line) | 17:22 |
*** fnaval has quit IRC | 17:22 | |
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:22 | |
boris-42 | Okay lemme add some info for non related to this stuff | 17:22 |
rediskin | http://logs.openstack.org/55/89555/11/check/check-rally-cli/bb84bd4/console.html | 17:23 |
boris-42 | 1) There is special job that is run against every patch in rally | 17:23 |
boris-42 | You already saw it | 17:23 |
boris-42 | it's called check-rally-cli | 17:23 |
boris-42 | if you click on it you'll get ^ that one from rediskin link result | 17:23 |
boris-42 | rediskin made a special mini framework for that | 17:24 |
* boris-42 rediskin and it's located here https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/tests_ci/test_cli.py | 17:24 | |
boris-42 | That job actually run devstack that install openstack & rally | 17:24 |
boris-42 | and then run all these tests | 17:24 |
boris-42 | from DeploymentTestCase | 17:25 |
boris-42 | and other | 17:25 |
boris-42 | what we need now is to test all CLI commands that we have and check that they works | 17:25 |
boris-42 | But we have some small issue | 17:25 |
*** markmcclain has quit IRC | 17:25 | |
boris-42 | They draw "tables" and it's hard to parse them | 17:25 |
boris-42 | so rediskin said that probably we should add to all commands JSON format as well | 17:25 |
boris-42 | and then we can test all | 17:26 |
hughsaunders | +1 | 17:26 |
rediskin | rally deployment list --output json | 17:26 |
boris-42 | + it's nice feature (if somebody is going to integrate somewhere rally) | 17:26 |
*** caleb_ has quit IRC | 17:26 | |
boris-42 | rediskin or --out_format ison | 17:26 |
*** fnaval has quit IRC | 17:27 | |
boris-42 | or --rest json lol | 17:27 |
hughsaunders | what do thethe rporjects use for this? as i think they have started supporting alternative output formats | 17:27 |
boris-42 | hughsaunders not sure they they support alternative outputs | 17:27 |
hughsaunders | oh, dear terrible touch screen typing! | 17:27 |
*** nedbat has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:27 | |
rediskin | openstack.common.cliutils used in rally | 17:28 |
*** emaganap has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:28 | |
*** dims_ has quit IRC | 17:28 | |
rediskin | there is no support for other formats, only prettytable | 17:28 |
boris-42 | hughsaunders actually it's implementation related | 17:28 |
*** emaganap has quit IRC | 17:29 | |
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:29 | |
*** xwizard has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:29 | |
boris-42 | hughsaunders so I think that we should just implement it | 17:29 |
*** malini2 has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:29 | |
hughsaunders | in common? | 17:30 |
rediskin | maybe we can make own print_list function and contribute it to upstream | 17:30 |
*** nedbat_ has quit IRC | 17:30 | |
*** carl_baldwin has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:30 | |
*** xwizard is now known as tnurlygayanov_ | 17:30 | |
hughsaunders | I must have been confused, cant find an option for alternative formatting in other openstack projects | 17:31 |
*** emagana has quit IRC | 17:31 | |
*** emagana has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:31 | |
hughsaunders | but however its implemented, great idea | 17:31 |
boris-42 | hughsaunders sometimes commands prints as well hints | 17:32 |
boris-42 | hughsaunders and other formatting stuff | 17:32 |
*** balajiiyer has left #openstack-meeting | 17:32 | |
boris-42 | hughsaunders so it's not just about printing tables back in JSON | 17:32 |
boris-42 | hughsaunders it's just a different output at all | 17:32 |
boris-42 | rediskin ^ | 17:32 |
hughsaunders | boris-42: so how would a user split the hints from the json output? | 17:33 |
rediskin | some unix command have oprtion for "batch-mode" | 17:33 |
hughsaunders | or would hints be surpressed when json is output? | 17:33 |
boris-42 | hughsaunders read my messages | 17:34 |
*** japplewhite has left #openstack-meeting | 17:34 | |
hughsaunders | boris-42: so you | 17:34 |
boris-42 | [21:32:01] <boris-42> hughsaunders sometimes commands prints as well hints | 17:34 |
boris-42 | [21:32:06] <boris-42> hughsaunders and other formatting stuff | 17:34 |
rediskin | e.g top: -b :Batch-mode operation | 17:34 |
rediskin | Starts top in 'Batch' mode, which could be useful for sending output from top to other programs or to a file... | 17:34 |
boris-42 | [21:32:14] balajiiyer (~Adium@72.32.115.231) left the channel. | 17:34 |
boris-42 | [21:32:25] <boris-42> hughsaunders so it's not just about printing tables back in JSON | 17:34 |
boris-42 | [21:32:32] <boris-42> hughsaunders it's just a different output at all | 17:34 |
boris-42 | hughsaunders rediskin nope guys | 17:34 |
boris-42 | hughsaunders rediskin it's just different output at all | 17:34 |
hughsaunders | boris-42: so no hints/comments when json is output? | 17:35 |
boris-42 | hughsaunders rediskin rally detailed for example will print just list | 17:35 |
hughsaunders | that makes sense as then it will be easy to parse | 17:35 |
boris-42 | hughsaunders in this list every element is aggregated data | 17:35 |
boris-42 | {"atomic_table": {}, "scenario_output": xxx, ….} | 17:35 |
*** Michalik_ has quit IRC | 17:36 | |
*** dane_leblanc has quit IRC | 17:36 | |
*** denis_makogon has quit IRC | 17:37 | |
*** VijayB_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:37 | |
*** amotoki_ has quit IRC | 17:37 | |
*** dane_leblanc has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:38 | |
hughsaunders | ahh, so multiple tables may be encoded into a single json output | 17:38 |
boris-42 | hughsaunders nope | 17:38 |
boris-42 | hughsaunders let's avoid mess | 17:38 |
boris-42 | hughsaunders Pretty user oriented output is one task | 17:39 |
*** ivar-lazzaro has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:39 | |
boris-42 | hughsaunders ugly formal json output is another | 17:39 |
boris-42 | hughsaunders one should be easy for humans another for machines | 17:39 |
hughsaunders | ok | 17:40 |
*** markwash_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:41 | |
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:42 | |
*** thedodd has quit IRC | 17:42 | |
*** markwash has quit IRC | 17:43 | |
*** markwash_ is now known as markwash | 17:43 | |
boris-42 | hughsaunders cause otherwise we will get something that is hard to use for both humans & machines | 17:43 |
boris-42 | hughsaunders + mess in code=) | 17:43 |
boris-42 | hughsaunders with non trivial logic=) | 17:43 |
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:44 | |
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC | 17:44 | |
*** eankutse1 has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:44 | |
*** _nadya__ has quit IRC | 17:45 | |
*** dshurtle has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:45 | |
boris-42 | #topic free discussion | 17:46 |
*** openstack changes topic to "free discussion (Meeting topic: rally)" | 17:46 | |
boris-42 | hughsaunders msdubov marcoemorais rediskin k4n0 kun_huang coolsvap amaretskiy anything to discuss? | 17:46 |
*** zdiN0bot has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:47 | |
rockyg | o/ | 17:47 |
boris-42 | rockyg hi there | 17:47 |
boris-42 | rockyg wanna discuss rally?) | 17:47 |
*** eankutse has quit IRC | 17:47 | |
rockyg | Hi! refstack is having a f2f in SF tomorrow. I was hoping we could get a rally person in the mix. Maybe demo rally? | 17:47 |
amaretskiy | nothing specific to discuss from me, I'm going to discuss my patches with boris-42 | 17:48 |
kun_huang | boris-42 nope, I'm reading functional testing discuss | 17:48 |
*** luis_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:48 | |
boris-42 | SF?) | 17:48 |
boris-42 | rockyg ^ | 17:48 |
rockyg | I think you guys have the UI donw and maybe your UI could have differnt endpoints? Rally, test server, refstack? | 17:48 |
rockyg | San Feancisco. | 17:49 |
boris-42 | rockyg oh unfortunately I am now in Moscow... | 17:49 |
rockyg | ^Francisco | 17:49 |
boris-42 | rockyg and we don't have anybody in US that is related to rally =( | 17:49 |
*** Haneef has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:49 | |
rockyg | Anyone out in SF bay area? | 17:49 |
boris-42 | rockyg =( | 17:49 |
rockyg | Dang. | 17:49 |
boris-42 | rockyg I was there | 17:49 |
boris-42 | rockyg recently (about 3 weeks ago) | 17:49 |
rockyg | Maybe we could do an irc or joinme for a bit? | 17:50 |
boris-42 | rockyg maybe Hangout call? | 17:50 |
boris-42 | rockyg I think google hangout is good enough for such things | 17:50 |
coolsvap | i think hangout is an option | 17:50 |
rockyg | Yeah, that would work. I'm not sure on times, though because our f2f is 1300-1800 UTC-07 | 17:50 |
coolsvap | i m waiting on it | 17:50 |
*** sballe_ has quit IRC | 17:50 | |
rockyg | Cool coolsvap | 17:51 |
boris-42 | rockyg so I can wake up in 4:30 a.m. | 17:51 |
*** zns has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:51 | |
hughsaunders | boris-42: dedication! | 17:51 |
rockyg | I really want to get some synergy going here and it seems rally UI is likely pretty solid and most advanced of all out there. | 17:51 |
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC | 17:51 | |
boris-42 | rockyg pls could you provide your email | 17:52 |
rockyg | What is that utc, boris-42? | 17:52 |
boris-42 | hughsaunders +4 | 17:52 |
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC | 17:52 | |
boris-42 | rockyg utc +4 | 17:52 |
*** zdiN0bot has left #openstack-meeting | 17:52 | |
boris-42 | rockyg so if we make it in 5 a.m. it will be about 6 p.m. in SF | 17:53 |
rockyg | my email is rockyg@gmail.com and rochelle.grober@huawei.com, but gmail is better for tomorrow. | 17:53 |
*** ildikov_ has quit IRC | 17:53 | |
boris-42 | rockyg works for you? | 17:53 |
boris-42 | hughsaunders wanna some late meeting?) | 17:53 |
boris-42 | coolsvap are you going to take a part in this stuff? | 17:53 |
*** Michalik_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:53 | |
coolsvap | boris-42: yes | 17:53 |
boris-42 | coolsvap email then | 17:54 |
rockyg | I'll get others on board for it. I think a late running meeting is fine. Might get a little pushback, but I can be pushy back;-) | 17:54 |
coolsvap | coolsvap@gmail.com | 17:54 |
hughsaunders | boris-42: i may be able to join also | 17:54 |
*** ildikov_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:54 | |
*** caleb_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:54 | |
*** ivar-lazzaro1 has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:54 | |
boris-42 | hughsaunders sorry for such a crazy time | 17:54 |
boris-42 | hughsaunders I just changed my schedule tied to work till late=) | 17:55 |
rockyg | that would be cool. a refstack/Rally mini summit | 17:55 |
*** rm_work|away is now known as rm_work | 17:55 | |
boris-42 | rockyg yep | 17:55 |
kun_huang | rockyg boris-42 what's the accurate time of that refstack meeting? | 17:56 |
boris-42 | hughsaunders rockyg kun_huang we need to make some party in Moscow | 17:56 |
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:56 | |
hughsaunders | boris-42: no promises but add me to the hangout and i'll join if i can | 17:56 |
boris-42 | coolsvap ^ | 17:56 |
hughsaunders | boris-42: if mirantis is paying ;-) | 17:56 |
boris-42 | hughsaunders hehe=) | 17:56 |
rockyg | party in Moscow! Maybe after Paris? | 17:56 |
boris-42 | rockyg maybe before? | 17:57 |
*** ihrachyshka has quit IRC | 17:57 | |
rockyg | Gotta get my passport in order! | 17:57 |
boris-42 | rockyg need to talk with Mirantis=) | 17:57 |
boris-42 | rockyg about party lol | 17:57 |
kun_huang | boris-42 rockyg both okay for me. I haven't gone to Europe | 17:57 |
coolsvap | rockyg: add me for hangout | 17:57 |
rockyg | <chucckle> | 17:57 |
*** ivar-lazzaro has quit IRC | 17:58 | |
boris-42 | kun_huang wanna as well hangout ? | 17:58 |
rockyg | OK. Anyone who wants in, post email here so I can refer back to minutes. | 17:58 |
boris-42 | rockyg coolsvap everybody get invites? | 17:58 |
kun_huang | rockyg okay | 17:58 |
hughsaunders | rockyg: hugh@wherenow.org | 17:58 |
boris-42 | rockyg I already made invite | 17:58 |
boris-42 | lol | 17:58 |
hughsaunders | boris-42: just got it.. | 17:59 |
*** e0ne has quit IRC | 17:59 | |
rockyg | Kewl! add davidlenwell and zehicle if you can. | 17:59 |
*** AndChat|641136 has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:59 | |
boris-42 | rockyg go to rally chat | 17:59 |
boris-42 | rockyg openstack-rally | 17:59 |
*** kristysiu has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:59 | |
boris-42 | so glad to see you guys all | 17:59 |
rockyg | going now. | 17:59 |
boris-42 | #endmeeting | 17:59 |
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings" | 17:59 | |
openstack | Meeting ended Tue Jun 10 17:59:45 2014 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 17:59 |
openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/rally/2014/rally.2014-06-10-16.59.html | 17:59 |
openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/rally/2014/rally.2014-06-10-16.59.txt | 17:59 |
openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/rally/2014/rally.2014-06-10-16.59.log.html | 17:59 |
*** rodrigods has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:00 | |
*** olkonami has left #openstack-meeting | 18:00 | |
*** raildo has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:00 | |
stevemar | o/ | 18:00 |
kristysiu | hi | 18:00 |
bknudson | hi | 18:00 |
morganfainberg | dolphm, ayoung, bknudson, dstanek, jamielennox, morganfainberg, stevemar, gyee, henrynash, topol, marekd, lbragstad, joesavak, shardy, fabiog, fmarco76, nkinder, lloydm, shrekuma, ksavich | 18:00 |
ayoung | You made it? | 18:01 |
*** jlibosva has quit IRC | 18:01 | |
morganfainberg | meeting time! https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/KeystoneMeeting | 18:01 |
stevemar | ahoy | 18:01 |
morganfainberg | ayoung, just got back this second | 18:01 |
*** AndChat|641136 is now known as e0ne | 18:01 | |
*** amaretskiy has left #openstack-meeting | 18:01 | |
*** eankutse1 has quit IRC | 18:01 | |
morganfainberg | ayoung, literally sat down. | 18:01 |
morganfainberg | seems like we're light on people today... anyway... | 18:01 |
*** henrynash has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:01 | |
gyee | \o | 18:01 |
henrynash | hi | 18:01 |
morganfainberg | here we go. | 18:01 |
morganfainberg | #startmeeting keystone | 18:01 |
openstack | Meeting started Tue Jun 10 18:01:59 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is morganfainberg. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 18:02 |
openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 18:02 |
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: keystone)" | 18:02 | |
openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'keystone' | 18:02 |
morganfainberg | #topic Juno1 Milestone | 18:02 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Juno1 Milestone (Meeting topic: keystone)" | 18:02 | |
*** rwsu has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:02 | |
*** DavidHu has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:02 | |
morganfainberg | #link https://launchpad.net/keystone/+milestone/juno-1 | 18:02 |
*** emagana has quit IRC | 18:02 | |
dstanek | o/ | 18:02 |
morganfainberg | Any changes that aren't gating by EOD today will be pushed toj2 | 18:02 |
morganfainberg | we have 2 changes that need eyes (afaik) | 18:03 |
*** e0ne has quit IRC | 18:03 | |
morganfainberg | #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/99075/ | 18:03 |
*** emagana has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:03 | |
*** jaypipes has quit IRC | 18:03 | |
morganfainberg | #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/74214/ | 18:03 |
gyee | gating is pretty risky these days :) | 18:03 |
stevemar | i'll take a look at those today | 18:03 |
dstanek | i will too | 18:03 |
morganfainberg | gyee, thats why today is the goal, gives us 2 days? | 18:03 |
ayoung | last one is pretty solid | 18:03 |
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:04 | |
ayoung | recommend we get it in and let people beat on it | 18:04 |
*** belmoreira has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:04 | |
morganfainberg | lets get the spec for that one in as well | 18:04 |
*** jamielennox has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:04 | |
*** rossk has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:04 | |
stevemar | ayoung, ++ I think thats the best course of action | 18:04 |
morganfainberg | but we'll hold that topic until later in the meeting (we have a whole section on it!) | 18:04 |
morganfainberg | ok moving on, we have a bunch to cover today | 18:05 |
morganfainberg | #topic Hackathon Information | 18:05 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Hackathon Information (Meeting topic: keystone)" | 18:05 | |
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:05 | |
morganfainberg | #link http://dolphm.com/openstack-keystone-hackathon-for-juno | 18:05 |
henrynash | for mine, teh only changes I will push in later today are moving the ID creation from controller to manager (few real lines of code to change, just lots of tetsing mechanical changes) | 18:05 |
*** mrodden has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:05 | |
henrynash | sorry, topic has moved on | 18:05 |
morganfainberg | henrynash, ah. | 18:05 |
morganfainberg | #link https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1TlJ2u1ucxpia0SkWbkRo-_5DmVfXEQG7GKYVLc9abfc/viewform?usp=send_form | 18:05 |
morganfainberg | i think everyone has filled out the form | 18:06 |
*** bobt has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:06 | |
*** ildikov_ has quit IRC | 18:06 | |
*** changbl has quit IRC | 18:06 | |
morganfainberg | no new info... just fill out the form if you haven't and you're going | 18:06 |
morganfainberg | see everyone in July in San Antonio | 18:06 |
stevemar | should be fun | 18:07 |
morganfainberg | henrynash, we can talk about the differences in spec vs what is in the review shortly | 18:07 |
henrynash | ok | 18:07 |
morganfainberg | #topic Spec Approval Requirements | 18:07 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Spec Approval Requirements (Meeting topic: keystone)" | 18:07 | |
morganfainberg | dolphm isn't here, so we don't get his view on it. | 18:07 |
*** emagana has quit IRC | 18:08 | |
ayoung | morganfainberg, I'd say it needs to be viewed by the team, with not major objections, and then at least two people go through a spec in depth | 18:08 |
*** jmontemayor has quit IRC | 18:08 | |
ayoung | so anyone on the team can -2 if it is really wrong | 18:08 |
*** emagana has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:08 | |
ayoung | but we need a way to say "I've looked at it and nothing scares me" | 18:08 |
ayoung | which is why Iwas thinking "vote in the weekly meeting" | 18:09 |
morganfainberg | ayoung, a general thumbs up/thumbs down in the meeting and then a really in depth 2x+2 seems reasonable to me | 18:09 |
gyee | deal | 18:10 |
bknudson | let's try it | 18:10 |
*** jmontemayor has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:10 | |
morganfainberg | we should also corner dolphm later today for his input, but i think it lines up. | 18:10 |
dstanek | sounds reasonable to me | 18:10 |
morganfainberg | cool. | 18:10 |
morganfainberg | no complaints? | 18:10 |
*** jmontemayor has quit IRC | 18:11 | |
morganfainberg | ok now moving onto the bulk of the meeting, the thumbs up/thumbs down for specifications | 18:11 |
*** luis_ has quit IRC | 18:11 | |
morganfainberg | #topic Keystone Spec Approvals | 18:11 |
*** marekd has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:11 | |
*** openstack changes topic to "Keystone Spec Approvals (Meeting topic: keystone)" | 18:11 | |
morganfainberg | ayoung, o/ this is all yours | 18:11 |
*** mrunge has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:11 | |
ayoung | OK..hoqdo we do votes here... | 18:11 |
morganfainberg | lead us through it | 18:11 |
*** Michalik_ has quit IRC | 18:11 | |
*** jmontemayor has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:12 | |
morganfainberg | startvote i think. | 18:12 |
ayoung | First one up is | 18:12 |
*** jmontemayor has quit IRC | 18:12 | |
ayoung | Service Token Composite Authorization | 18:12 |
morganfainberg | #link https://review.openstack.org/96315 | 18:13 |
*** jmontemayor has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:13 | |
ayoung | Thanks | 18:13 |
ayoung | #startvote | 18:13 |
openstack | Only the meeting chair may start a vote. | 18:13 |
ayoung | hmmm | 18:13 |
gyee | heh | 18:13 |
morganfainberg | before we vote, any questions on the topic? | 18:13 |
dstanek | fail! | 18:13 |
bknudson | I haven't looked at it, but it looks doable to me. | 18:13 |
morganfainberg | Quick intro: this is providing a service-token (e.g. glance service user) to the auth-token middleware | 18:13 |
bknudson | from scanning through it now | 18:13 |
morganfainberg | then policy can act upon either the x-auth-token or x-service-token | 18:14 |
gyee | no major objection here | 18:14 |
bknudson | I think we discussed this on irc | 18:14 |
morganfainberg | bknudson, we did and at the summit | 18:14 |
ayoung | morganfainberg, what is policy.json going to look like for these? | 18:14 |
jamielennox | morganfainberg: i haven't gone through the spec in detail but it looks like what i remember from summit | 18:14 |
jamielennox | (so +1) | 18:14 |
morganfainberg | ayoung, TBD, but i think it will be %(service_user_id) or %(service_roles) vs %(role) | 18:15 |
dstanek | what's the 'different manner'? | 18:15 |
*** mrunge has quit IRC | 18:15 | |
ayoung | morganfainberg, since you are chair, I think you have to #startvote | 18:15 |
ayoung | http://ci.openstack.org/meetbot.html#voting | 18:15 |
morganfainberg | ayoung, yeah sec | 18:15 |
bknudson | how about update the commit message to say it was discussed at meeting on 2014-06-10 and approved? | 18:16 |
morganfainberg | #startvote Service Token Composite Authorization, do we like the general approach? Yes, no | 18:16 |
openstack | Begin voting on: Service Token Composite Authorization, do we like the general approach? Valid vote options are Yes, no. | 18:16 |
openstack | Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. | 18:16 |
bknudson | #vote Yes | 18:16 |
*** thinrichs has quit IRC | 18:16 | |
gyee | #vote hell yeah | 18:16 |
openstack | gyee: hell yeah is not a valid option. Valid options are Yes, no. | 18:16 |
ayoung | #vote Yes | 18:16 |
jamielennox | #vote yes | 18:16 |
morganfainberg | #vote yes | 18:16 |
henrynash | #vote yes | 18:16 |
gyee | #vote Yes | 18:16 |
stevemar | #vote yes | 18:16 |
dstanek | #vote yes | 18:17 |
morganfainberg | bknudson, i like the idea link to the summary showing approval. | 18:17 |
*** coolsvap is now known as coolsvap|afk | 18:17 | |
*** bdpayne has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:17 | |
morganfainberg | everyone voted? | 18:17 |
stevemar | everyone but dolphm | 18:17 |
*** rockyg has left #openstack-meeting | 18:17 | |
morganfainberg | o | 18:17 |
morganfainberg | #endvote | 18:17 |
openstack | Voted on "Service Token Composite Authorization, do we like the general approach?" Results are | 18:17 |
bknudson | too late dolphm, already decided | 18:17 |
openstack | Yes (8): gyee, dstanek, ayoung, morganfainberg, bknudson, jamielennox, henrynash, stevemar | 18:17 |
ayoung | OK next up | 18:18 |
jamielennox | i'll be interested to see how this one works in practice, i'm not sure how easy it'll be to craft policy that works with and without subject tokens | 18:18 |
ayoung | token versions independent from API versions | 18:18 |
*** __afazekas is now known as afazekas | 18:18 | |
morganfainberg | #link https://review.openstack.org/98464 | 18:18 |
morganfainberg | this might actually be better suited for K | 18:18 |
morganfainberg | this would be what leads to the id-only tokens | 18:19 |
ayoung | So... | 18:19 |
bknudson | well, we're never going to change identity version again anyways | 18:19 |
ayoung | do we really want to do this just for Tokens? | 18:19 |
morganfainberg | it basically amkes token versions independant of the API version | 18:19 |
morganfainberg | bknudson, agree | 18:19 |
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:19 | |
stevemar | 98464 -> seems no one has reviewed it but lance | 18:19 |
morganfainberg | ayoung, what would be the other options? for all objects (e.g. users, domains, etc)? | 18:19 |
bknudson | "microversioning" | 18:19 |
*** k4n0 has left #openstack-meeting | 18:19 | |
ayoung | I mean, each of the various entities, or at least top level modules could benefit from this approach | 18:19 |
ayoung | why token more than, say, user? | 18:19 |
ayoung | er identity | 18:20 |
morganfainberg | ayoung, i think because we have a real need for limiting token size. | 18:20 |
morganfainberg | ayoung, vs a nice-to-have | 18:20 |
jamielennox | morganfainberg: this is being done as a querystring? | 18:20 |
morganfainberg | ayoung, would be my only (not so strong) argument | 18:20 |
morganfainberg | jamielennox, that was the original idea | 18:20 |
morganfainberg | default token version in config (or in the case of V2, the API controller) | 18:21 |
morganfainberg | overridable with a query string | 18:21 |
dstanek | i haven't read the spec...does it was what will vary based on the version? | 18:21 |
ayoung | accepts header? | 18:21 |
jamielennox | morganfainberg: i'm not sure that really makes sense, you would end up in a situation like /v3/auth/tokens?format=v2 | 18:22 |
bknudson | y, let's figure out a way to do the microversioning | 18:22 |
bknudson | and let's not do it with a query parameter | 18:22 |
bknudson | use accepts header | 18:22 |
ayoung | OK, I'm going to suggest we table this one until it gets more review | 18:22 |
morganfainberg | bknudson, ++ ok lets table this one and move towards micro-versioning. | 18:22 |
ayoung | next up | 18:22 |
bknudson | sounds like don't plan to do it for J anyways | 18:22 |
*** eankutse has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:22 | |
ayoung | api-validation blueprint | 18:22 |
morganfainberg | #link https://review.openstack.org/95957 | 18:23 |
bknudson | hmm, don't see ldbragst | 18:23 |
bknudson | let me walk over | 18:23 |
ayoung | While we are waiting | 18:23 |
ayoung | please don;t have the name of the spec review begin with "add spec..." | 18:23 |
*** rediskin has left #openstack-meeting | 18:23 | |
ayoung | Its like, duh | 18:23 |
ayoung | or as they say here | 18:24 |
ayoung | der | 18:24 |
*** manishg has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:24 | |
bknudson | not in. I guess we've got a meeting scheduled over this one | 18:24 |
bknudson | well, I like the proposal | 18:25 |
morganfainberg | do we defer it then? | 18:25 |
morganfainberg | can vote anyway | 18:25 |
*** harlowja is now known as harlowja_away | 18:25 | |
ayoung | I'm still OK with this one. I'd like to see bknudson 's comments addressed, but the general approach is strong | 18:25 |
bknudson | this is one of the things on our security checklist for our products | 18:25 |
*** dims_ has quit IRC | 18:25 | |
bknudson | only concern is breaking backwards compat | 18:25 |
morganfainberg | #startvote api-validation specification. Yes, No | 18:25 |
openstack | Unable to parse vote topic and options. | 18:25 |
*** caleb_ has quit IRC | 18:25 | |
dstanek | approach is good...i'm curious to see what this looks like with a fully fleshed out implementation | 18:25 |
bknudson | #vote Yes | 18:26 |
dstanek | #vote yes | 18:26 |
ayoung | try that again morganfainberg | 18:26 |
marekd | #vote yes | 18:26 |
morganfainberg | #startvote Do we accept the proposal for api-validation? Yes, No | 18:26 |
openstack | Begin voting on: Do we accept the proposal for api-validation? Valid vote options are Yes, No. | 18:26 |
openstack | Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. | 18:26 |
ayoung | #vote yes | 18:26 |
marekd | #vote yes | 18:26 |
bknudson | #vote yes | 18:26 |
dstanek | #vote yes | 18:26 |
morganfainberg | #yote yes | 18:26 |
jamielennox | #vote yes | 18:26 |
stevemar | #vote yes | 18:26 |
*** gokrokve_ has quit IRC | 18:26 | |
henrynash | #vote yes | 18:26 |
morganfainberg | looks like everyone | 18:27 |
stevemar | i was happy with this one a few iterations ago | 18:27 |
morganfainberg | #endvote | 18:27 |
openstack | Voted on "Do we accept the proposal for api-validation?" Results are | 18:27 |
openstack | Yes (7): dstanek, ayoung, bknudson, marekd, jamielennox, henrynash, stevemar | 18:27 |
gyee | I am not comfortable voting on this one as I haven't gone through the details | 18:27 |
*** eankutse has quit IRC | 18:27 | |
morganfainberg | gyee, ah, sorry missed you | 18:27 |
* morganfainberg grumbles and learns to count | 18:27 | |
bknudson | are we voting on the details or on the general approach? | 18:27 |
morganfainberg | general approach | 18:27 |
ayoung | next up was Cross Backend Unique Identifiers for User and Group Entities but I don't see it | 18:27 |
ayoung | did it merge? | 18:27 |
bknudson | I don't like the ugly error message, but other than that think it's a good idea | 18:27 |
morganfainberg | details are for the review | 18:27 |
bknudson | uniuque IDs merged | 18:27 |
bknudson | first spec! | 18:28 |
morganfainberg | henrynash, any updates on the spec vs what is up for the review? | 18:28 |
morganfainberg | before we move on? | 18:28 |
ayoung | gyee, OK...-1 the spec and up it to +1 or 2 when you are comforatable | 18:28 |
gyee | ayoung, thanks, I'll definitely review it today | 18:29 |
henrynash | morganfainberg: no, the only differences from the version posted right now and the spec are listed in limiations | 18:29 |
morganfainberg | ok | 18:29 |
henrynash | of the commit message | 18:29 |
ayoung | can we use bugs for spec bugs? | 18:29 |
*** eankutse has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:29 | |
*** jecarey has quit IRC | 18:29 | |
ayoung | Like :spec for X says foo but should say bar. | 18:29 |
morganfainberg | ayoung, i'd just propose the change to the spec. | 18:29 |
ayoung | morganfainberg, fair enough | 18:29 |
*** safchain has quit IRC | 18:29 | |
morganfainberg | unless the spec is fully implemented, then bugs are probably the right approach | 18:29 |
ayoung | next up | 18:29 |
ayoung | r V3 extension advertisement | 18:30 |
*** eankutse has quit IRC | 18:30 | |
bknudson | hey! | 18:30 |
ayoung | #link https://review.openstack.org/95973 | 18:30 |
bknudson | any qs? | 18:30 |
morganfainberg | #link https://review.openstack.org/95973 | 18:30 |
*** eankutse has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:30 | |
stevemar | ++++ | 18:30 |
morganfainberg | i'm happy with it as is. | 18:30 |
stevemar | very happy with it as is | 18:30 |
bknudson | got a request from dolphm to have the router intercept the GET / request | 18:30 |
gyee | this is a no-brainer | 18:30 |
bknudson | so that's the approach proposed | 18:30 |
*** gduan has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:30 | |
morganfainberg | bknudson, yeah that works. | 18:30 |
bknudson | rather than having the controller register | 18:30 |
ayoung | bknudson, ":.. code-block:: javascript" | 18:30 |
*** jecarey has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:31 | |
morganfainberg | #startvote Accept V3 Extension Advertisement spec? yes, no | 18:31 |
openstack | Begin voting on: Accept V3 Extension Advertisement spec? Valid vote options are yes, no. | 18:31 |
openstack | Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. | 18:31 |
jamielennox | bknudson: you don't intend to advertise these from GET / just /v3? | 18:31 |
bknudson | like is done with admin & public | 18:31 |
ayoung | #vote yes | 18:31 |
bknudson | jamielennox: right, just GET /v3. | 18:31 |
morganfainberg | #vote yes | 18:31 |
henrynash | #vote yes | 18:31 |
dstanek | #vote yes | 18:31 |
gyee | #vote yes | 18:31 |
stevemar | #vote yes | 18:31 |
jamielennox | #vote yes | 18:31 |
*** garyduan has quit IRC | 18:31 | |
stevemar | ayoung, calling it javascript might just be a limitation of sphinx | 18:32 |
morganfainberg | marekd, you want to weigh in? | 18:32 |
marekd | haven't read it - don't wait :/ | 18:32 |
bknudson | jamielennox: it would be tricky to have it work with GET / since the controllers don't get to see those. | 18:32 |
morganfainberg | marekd, ok | 18:32 |
morganfainberg | #endvote | 18:32 |
openstack | Voted on "Accept V3 Extension Advertisement spec?" Results are | 18:32 |
openstack | yes (7): gyee, dstanek, ayoung, morganfainberg, jamielennox, henrynash, stevemar | 18:32 |
jamielennox | bknudson: there has been the assumption until now that the information provided at /v3 is a subset of what is provided at /, it means if i hit the version control at / i don't have to do /v3 | 18:32 |
ayoung | Web Authentication for SAML federated Keystone | 18:32 |
morganfainberg | #link https://review.openstack.org/96867 | 18:32 |
*** ildikov has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:33 | |
marekd | ppl have some concerns here... | 18:33 |
stevemar | lots of questions on this one still | 18:33 |
bknudson | jamielennox: maybe there's a way to do it that I haven't thought of | 18:33 |
marekd | stevemar: ++ | 18:33 |
ayoung | This one I would say is not quite full baked yet | 18:33 |
*** jecarey_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:33 | |
*** jgrimm has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:33 | |
morganfainberg | should we table this one then? | 18:33 |
jamielennox | bknudson: i'm not saying the assumption is correct but its going to be a bit of a pain to do both | 18:33 |
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:33 | |
*** beagles has quit IRC | 18:33 | |
ayoung | Its on the right track, but I think it might actually require some input from Horizon folks | 18:33 |
morganfainberg | ayoung, after this mind commenting on the specs that we table saying as much? | 18:33 |
ayoung | ++ | 18:34 |
stevemar | yeah, so far no input from any horizon folks | 18:34 |
morganfainberg | reasonable to ask horizon to weigh in on this | 18:34 |
*** emagana has quit IRC | 18:34 | |
marekd | and what about addind a 'static webpage' tied directly to Keystone? | 18:34 |
ayoung | Table? | 18:34 |
morganfainberg | #action ayoung to comment on tabled specification reviews (why and what was decided) | 18:34 |
ayoung | Next up non-persistent-tokens | 18:34 |
*** kgriffs is now known as kgriffs|afk | 18:35 | |
morganfainberg | #link https://review.openstack.org/95976 | 18:35 |
jamielennox | table, at the very least it should be an extension | 18:35 |
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:35 | |
bknudson | I looked over this one and no real issues with it. Could use more details but I think it's workable | 18:35 |
morganfainberg | jamielennox, ++ | 18:35 |
ayoung | bknudson, I assume your comments are detail oriented, not show stoppers? | 18:35 |
ayoung | any of them worth noting? | 18:35 |
bknudson | there was a question about whether it's discoverable or not | 18:36 |
morganfainberg | a lot of the work on this one is scaffolding so we can make the token presistence redundant | 18:36 |
ayoung | bknudson, I would say "no" | 18:36 |
bknudson | also it might be a good idea to split out the token object from persistent tokens | 18:36 |
ayoung | at least, I see no reason to make it discoverabl | 18:36 |
morganfainberg | bknudson, that is the data model bit. | 18:36 |
ayoung | the keystone server can validate using PKI | 18:36 |
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:36 | |
morganfainberg | bknudson, it should be more explicit then. | 18:36 |
*** emagana has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:37 | |
morganfainberg | any questions on the persistence of tokens spec? | 18:37 |
*** jecarey has quit IRC | 18:37 | |
morganfainberg | erm non-persistence? | 18:37 |
ayoung | Note that this depends on widespread consumtion of revocation evetns | 18:37 |
ayoung | events | 18:37 |
*** giustoXricordarv has quit IRC | 18:37 | |
*** beagles has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:37 | |
ayoung | which is still WIP | 18:37 |
ayoung | but I don't think there is any question to the validity of the approach | 18:38 |
bknudson | is there a spec for remaining revocation events work? | 18:38 |
ayoung | bknudson, let me check | 18:38 |
gyee | morganfainberg, you may want the security folks to chime in on that one | 18:38 |
*** giustoXricordarv has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:38 | |
ayoung | not a new spec, but an old BP I think | 18:38 |
*** mdml has quit IRC | 18:38 | |
morganfainberg | gyee, ++ i'll add securityimpact | 18:38 |
bknudson | ok, I thought at this point we require specs. | 18:38 |
morganfainberg | bknudson, we do | 18:39 |
ayoung | https://blueprints.launchpad.net/python-keystoneclient/+spec/revocation-event-api | 18:39 |
dstanek | i haven't thought about this one enough to vote on it | 18:39 |
ayoung | but that does not indicate Auth Token middleware...I'll work up a spec for the Auth Token work. | 18:39 |
*** ArthurBerezin has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:39 | |
morganfainberg | ok | 18:39 |
morganfainberg | well lets quick vote, i'll add a 3rd option going forward, table | 18:39 |
morganfainberg | #startvote Accept Non-Persistence of tokens Spec? Yes, No, Table | 18:40 |
openstack | Begin voting on: Accept Non-Persistence of tokens Spec? Valid vote options are Yes, No, Table. | 18:40 |
openstack | Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. | 18:40 |
bknudson | #vote table | 18:40 |
ayoung | #vote yes | 18:40 |
dstanek | #vote table | 18:40 |
* morganfainberg abstains. | 18:40 | |
gyee | #vote table | 18:40 |
jamielennox | #vote i love the approach but i think it's too soon | 18:40 |
openstack | jamielennox: i love the approach but i think it's too soon is not a valid option. Valid options are Yes, No, Table. | 18:40 |
jamielennox | :( | 18:40 |
jamielennox | #vote table | 18:40 |
marekd | #vote table | 18:41 |
henrynash | #vote yes | 18:41 |
ayoung | Are we really not happy with the spec? | 18:41 |
*** ArthurBerezin has left #openstack-meeting | 18:41 | |
ayoung | It has dependencies, but the approach is right | 18:41 |
morganfainberg | ayoung, i think we need the revocations evtents spec | 18:41 |
morganfainberg | before we can accept this one | 18:41 |
ayoung | why? | 18:41 |
gyee | ayoung, I am not sure if we fully flush out the implications yet | 18:41 |
morganfainberg | w/o the dependencies, we can't implement this completely | 18:41 |
*** gduan has quit IRC | 18:41 | |
*** garyduan has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:42 | |
ayoung | We need Auth token middleware to accept them, but the logic cor that is well established | 18:42 |
ayoung | cor -> for | 18:42 |
ayoung | the API spec is up for review | 18:42 |
ayoung | and the events are part of the server | 18:42 |
jamielennox | also morganfainberg is lining up a lot of work for himself | 18:42 |
ayoung | so, no, I don't think we *need* it, but it can't hurt to have it laid out | 18:42 |
morganfainberg | ayoung, sure, i think if that spec was accepted then this one could be. lets revisit next week if its an issue i'll gut the persistence part and make it only the scaffolding work. | 18:42 |
ayoung | ++ | 18:43 |
morganfainberg | #endvote | 18:43 |
openstack | Voted on "Accept Non-Persistence of tokens Spec?" Results are | 18:43 |
openstack | Table (5): bknudson, dstanek, gyee, marekd, jamielennox | 18:43 |
openstack | Yes (2): henrynash, ayoung | 18:43 |
*** igordcard has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:43 | |
*** Mandell has quit IRC | 18:43 | |
ayoung | audit support for federation | 18:43 |
morganfainberg | tabled till next week, might require reduction in scope for J | 18:43 |
morganfainberg | #link https://review.openstack.org/97581 | 18:43 |
bknudson | have not looked at this one | 18:43 |
stevemar | it's got a few issues with it | 18:43 |
morganfainberg | i think this one is fairly straightforward | 18:44 |
*** nedbat has quit IRC | 18:44 | |
morganfainberg | but the issues are all in details not approach | 18:44 |
stevemar | i think i might upload a new version soon if topol doesn't get around to it | 18:44 |
gyee | yeah, this one seem like a no-brainer | 18:44 |
*** nedbat has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:44 | |
bknudson | I assume it's using and extending the current auditing | 18:44 |
morganfainberg | bknudson, yes | 18:44 |
stevemar | bknudson, yep | 18:44 |
bknudson | rather than starting something new | 18:44 |
ayoung | I would like to see some sort of test listener | 18:44 |
*** ilyashak_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:44 | |
morganfainberg | bknudson, jsut expanding to federation work. | 18:44 |
*** jprovazn has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:44 | |
ayoung | something that a Keystone admin could run to confirm that the events are being emitted | 18:44 |
stevemar | as it stands only events that call auth controller are logged | 18:45 |
morganfainberg | i think we can vote on this one, remember the vote is general approach | 18:45 |
bknudson | we've got a request to enable notifications by default | 18:45 |
*** ilyashak_ has quit IRC | 18:45 | |
stevemar | something that seems worth doing | 18:45 |
ayoung | And the red blocks from whitespace burn my eyes | 18:45 |
morganfainberg | bknudson, right. | 18:45 |
stevemar | ayoung, i'll upload a new version today :) | 18:45 |
morganfainberg | #startvote Audit Notifications for Federation? Yes, No, Table | 18:45 |
openstack | Begin voting on: Audit Notifications for Federation? Valid vote options are Yes, No, Table. | 18:45 |
dstanek | I don't see a lot of info in the proposed changes section | 18:45 |
openstack | Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. | 18:45 |
bknudson | #vote yes | 18:45 |
*** ilyashak_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:45 | |
stevemar | #vote yes | 18:45 |
morganfainberg | #vote yes | 18:45 |
ayoung | #vote yes | 18:45 |
marekd | #vote yes | 18:45 |
gyee | #vote yes | 18:45 |
henrynash | #vote table | 18:45 |
*** nedbat_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:46 | |
*** ilyashak_ has quit IRC | 18:46 | |
*** thedodd has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:46 | |
morganfainberg | dstanek, i think it's a small amount of changes | 18:46 |
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:46 | |
henrynash | #vote yes | 18:46 |
morganfainberg | dstanek, it's really about adding a decorator i think. | 18:46 |
*** nedbat_ has quit IRC | 18:46 | |
dstanek | #vote no - i have no idea what's actually changing :-( | 18:46 |
openstack | dstanek: no - i have no idea what's actually changing :-( is not a valid option. Valid options are Yes, No, Table. | 18:46 |
dstanek | #vote table | 18:46 |
*** nedbat_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:46 | |
morganfainberg | dstanek, try again :P | 18:46 |
morganfainberg | anyone want to switch to table? | 18:47 |
jamielennox | #vote yes | 18:47 |
dstanek | i'd love to know more before voting | 18:47 |
morganfainberg | going in 3 | 18:47 |
morganfainberg | #endvote | 18:47 |
openstack | Voted on "Audit Notifications for Federation?" Results are | 18:47 |
openstack | Table (1): dstanek | 18:47 |
openstack | Yes (8): gyee, ayoung, morganfainberg, bknudson, marekd, jamielennox, henrynash, stevemar | 18:47 |
gyee | dstanek, no peer pressure here :) | 18:47 |
jamielennox | dstanek: but i agree, given that i know we want to do auditing i don't learn much from the spec | 18:47 |
morganfainberg | i think this yes is contigent on using the same notifiers as we currently use | 18:47 |
ayoung | dstanek, -1 the review and comment on what you want to see, please | 18:47 |
bknudson | henrynash voted for all 3 | 18:47 |
dstanek | ayoung: of course | 18:47 |
henrynash | bknudson: well, I dint vote no | 18:48 |
morganfainberg | ok, next up? | 18:48 |
ayoung | Next up JSON Home | 18:48 |
*** annegentle_ has quit IRC | 18:48 | |
ayoung | #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/97359/ | 18:48 |
bknudson | if the spec turns out to be a disaster hopefully the Yes vote here isn't binding | 18:48 |
morganfainberg | i'll be honest i haven't looked at it | 18:48 |
morganfainberg | bknudson, nah yes isn't binding | 18:48 |
bknudson | btw, I just wrote this up because it's interesting | 18:48 |
*** pelix has quit IRC | 18:48 | |
ayoung | bknudson, Yes means "I have no serious objections" | 18:48 |
*** sushils_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:48 | |
*** erecio has quit IRC | 18:48 | |
bknudson | wasn't planning to even work on it unless I had some time. | 18:49 |
*** rellerreller has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:49 | |
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:49 | |
*** erecio has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:49 | |
bknudson | also, someone might say do this rather than the v3 extension advertisement | 18:49 |
*** rellerreller has left #openstack-meeting | 18:49 | |
morganfainberg | #startvote JSON Home Spec? Yes, No, Table | 18:49 |
openstack | Begin voting on: JSON Home Spec? Valid vote options are Yes, No, Table. | 18:49 |
ayoung | Oooh | 18:49 |
openstack | Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. | 18:49 |
dstanek | i think this is great | 18:49 |
dstanek | #vote yes | 18:49 |
*** nedbat has quit IRC | 18:49 | |
*** balajiiyer has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:49 | |
* morganfainberg has to abstain because i haven't read it in depth | 18:49 | |
morganfainberg | or at all | 18:49 |
gyee | so JSON home will eventually deprecate the current scheme? | 18:50 |
ayoung | morganfainberg, then vote table | 18:50 |
morganfainberg | #vote table | 18:50 |
jamielennox | bknudson: did you find any libraries that could deal with jsonhome? | 18:50 |
bknudson | gyee: there is really no current scheme | 18:50 |
bknudson | jamielennox: I didn't look for a library | 18:50 |
gyee | bknudson, current version discovery I mean | 18:50 |
bknudson | gyee: right, it would cover current version discovery | 18:51 |
jamielennox | bknudson: it's not all that well defined but there is definetly a current scheme and it's at least similar across most openstack services | 18:51 |
bknudson | so hopefully we'd deprecate the current way | 18:51 |
ayoung | #vote table | 18:51 |
*** SridharG has quit IRC | 18:51 | |
ayoung | Lets get the library and some more eyes on this before we say OK | 18:51 |
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC | 18:51 | |
jamielennox | #vote table | 18:51 |
bknudson | jamielennox: there was a project that was using it... marconi maybe | 18:51 |
*** yingjun has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:52 | |
henrynash | #vote yes | 18:52 |
jamielennox | bknudson: yea, marconi was what i was thinking - but honestly i think if i was TC an incubation requirement would be to use a similar format to everyone else | 18:52 |
*** hashar has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:52 | |
gyee | bknudson, did we discuss this at one of the cross-project sessions? | 18:52 |
jamielennox | (whatever that is) | 18:52 |
bknudson | they'll both work | 18:52 |
bknudson | gyee: I don't think it was discussed, there's been some mailing list discussion | 18:52 |
gyee | #vote yes | 18:53 |
gyee | anything for consistency | 18:53 |
morganfainberg | anyone else? | 18:53 |
gyee | next up, pagination! | 18:53 |
morganfainberg | in 3 | 18:53 |
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:53 | |
morganfainberg | #endvote | 18:53 |
openstack | Voted on "JSON Home Spec?" Results are | 18:53 |
openstack | Table (3): ayoung, morganfainberg, jamielennox | 18:53 |
openstack | Yes (3): henrynash, gyee, dstanek | 18:53 |
bknudson | a tie! | 18:53 |
morganfainberg | Even keel | 18:53 |
dstanek | i'm getting better at this voting thing | 18:54 |
morganfainberg | dstanek, hehe | 18:54 |
*** Mandell has quit IRC | 18:54 | |
*** olaph has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:54 | |
morganfainberg | lets look into a library, with a library i'm a yes | 18:54 |
ayoung | Lets try to revisit this one next week. | 18:54 |
morganfainberg | ayoung, ++ | 18:54 |
ayoung | Next up Session tokens | 18:54 |
ayoung | OIK...little bit of background | 18:54 |
*** giustoXricordarv has quit IRC | 18:54 | |
ayoung | Horizon does unspeakable things with tokens | 18:54 |
ayoung | well, everyone does, byut horizon particularly | 18:55 |
ayoung | Horizon really needs sessions, not tokens, to maintain a cache of the userid and password | 18:55 |
ayoung | if we do a session, the rules would be different than they are for tokens: | 18:55 |
bknudson | horizon must have sessions | 18:55 |
bknudson | it's part of django | 18:55 |
ayoung | bknudson, yeah, but not in its connection with Keystone | 18:55 |
ayoung | so | 18:55 |
morganfainberg | bknudson, right now they use the keystone token (effectively) as the session | 18:55 |
ayoung | Horizon doesn't hold on to password | 18:56 |
morganfainberg | bknudson, and store that in ... the session object | 18:56 |
ayoung | it uses a keystone token, and passes one scoped token to keystone to get another scoped differently | 18:56 |
ayoung | this is kida wrong | 18:56 |
*** markmcclain has quit IRC | 18:56 | |
ayoung | least privilege says "got from unscoped to scoped only" | 18:56 |
*** Michalik_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:56 | |
ayoung | but also, if we shorted the token lifespan any shorter, we are going to be kicking people out of horizon even when they are actively using it | 18:57 |
jamielennox | #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/96648/ | 18:57 |
ayoung | a session should last about 10 minutes | 18:57 |
morganfainberg | (configurable) | 18:57 |
morganfainberg | and can be extended | 18:57 |
ayoung | yes | 18:57 |
*** yingjun has quit IRC | 18:57 | |
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC | 18:57 | |
ayoung | if the user actively contacts the server, the session shsoulkd be extended | 18:57 |
bknudson | I don't see how a session token is going to work with pki... the doc has the expiration time | 18:57 |
morganfainberg | 2 minutes. | 18:58 |
ayoung | bknudson, it has to be done via keystone | 18:58 |
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:58 | |
ayoung | handthe old session back, get a new one, or some comparable mechanism | 18:58 |
dstanek | what can you do with a session token? just exchange it for a scoped token? | 18:58 |
bknudson | it's only unscoped? | 18:58 |
*** yogeshmehra has quit IRC | 18:58 | |
ayoung | correct | 18:58 |
ayoung | to both of you | 18:58 |
morganfainberg | #startvote Session Tokens Spec? yes, no, table | 18:58 |
openstack | Begin voting on: Session Tokens Spec? Valid vote options are yes, no, table. | 18:58 |
openstack | Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. | 18:58 |
morganfainberg | keep talking just gettnig the vote going. | 18:59 |
*** marun is now known as marun_afk | 18:59 | |
morganfainberg | personally, i like the idea and would love to see it | 18:59 |
*** gduan has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:59 | |
morganfainberg | and the general principle is sound | 18:59 |
morganfainberg | imo | 18:59 |
morganfainberg | #vote yes | 18:59 |
* ayoung abstains | 18:59 | |
gyee | #vote table | 18:59 |
bknudson | #vote table | 19:00 |
*** garyduan has quit IRC | 19:00 | |
bknudson | Haven't looked at it. | 19:00 |
bknudson | also, we're out of time | 19:00 |
morganfainberg | we're at the end, feel free to table and we can circle back | 19:00 |
gyee | like non-persistence one, we need more in-depth study on the impact as it fundamentally changed how Horizon operates | 19:00 |
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC | 19:00 | |
ayoung | close out the vote before we close the meeting, please | 19:00 |
morganfainberg | ok lets circle back on this one. | 19:00 |
jamielennox | i want more information | 19:00 |
morganfainberg | #endvote | 19:00 |
openstack | Voted on "Session Tokens Spec?" Results are | 19:00 |
openstack | table (2): gyee, bknudson | 19:00 |
openstack | yes (1): morganfainberg | 19:00 |
morganfainberg | #endmeeting | 19:00 |
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings" | 19:00 | |
openstack | Meeting ended Tue Jun 10 19:00:56 2014 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 19:00 |
openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/keystone/2014/keystone.2014-06-10-18.01.html | 19:00 |
openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/keystone/2014/keystone.2014-06-10-18.01.txt | 19:01 |
openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/keystone/2014/keystone.2014-06-10-18.01.log.html | 19:01 |
fungi | infra team assemble! | 19:01 |
fungi | pinging (for listed agenda items) mordred reed rdopiera ianw anteaya | 19:01 |
reed | o/ | 19:01 |
*** lcostantino has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:01 | |
*** Macaveli has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:01 | |
*** jamielennox has left #openstack-meeting | 19:01 | |
*** luis_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:01 | |
krotscheck | o/ | 19:01 |
ianw | o/ (but the agenda item is from last week) | 19:01 |
*** bobt has quit IRC | 19:01 | |
pleia2 | o/ | 19:01 |
fungi | ianw: okay, i can skip that if you have no updates | 19:01 |
anteaya | o/ | 19:02 |
clarkb | o/ | 19:02 |
reed | gotta kill firefox every day at least once... something's off | 19:02 |
zaro | o/ | 19:02 |
ianw | fungi: nothing for the meeting, thanks | 19:02 |
fungi | SergeyLukjanov: around? | 19:02 |
SergeyLukjanov | yup | 19:02 |
mordred | o/ | 19:02 |
*** bknudson has quit IRC | 19:02 | |
SergeyLukjanov | o/ | 19:02 |
fungi | i think we have quorum | 19:02 |
fungi | #startmeeting infra | 19:02 |
openstack | Meeting started Tue Jun 10 19:02:40 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is fungi. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 19:02 |
openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 19:02 |
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: infra)" | 19:02 | |
openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'infra' | 19:02 |
jesusaurus | o/ | 19:02 |
SergeyLukjanov | fungi, ++ | 19:02 |
*** pcrews_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:02 | |
SergeyLukjanov | and I think I have a big latency ;) | 19:03 |
fungi | #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/InfraTeamMeeting#Agenda_for_next_meeting | 19:03 |
fungi | #topic Actions from last meeting | 19:03 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Actions from last meeting (Meeting topic: infra)" | 19:03 | |
*** harlowja_away is now known as harlowja | 19:03 | |
*** garyduan has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:03 | |
anteaya | I like the quick topics | 19:03 |
fungi | #link http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/infra/2014/infra.2014-06-03-19.02.html | 19:03 |
*** gduan has quit IRC | 19:03 | |
fungi | there were none | 19:03 |
fungi | (that was quick) | 19:03 |
anteaya | :D | 19:04 |
*** thedodd has quit IRC | 19:04 | |
*** mugsie has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:04 | |
fungi | #topic Manage-projects status (fungi, mordred) | 19:04 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Manage-projects status (fungi, mordred) (Meeting topic: infra)" | 19:04 | |
fungi | mordred fixed a new bug today | 19:04 |
mordred | fungi: I pushed a patch to fix the current issue | 19:04 |
fungi | #link https://review.openstack.org/99136 | 19:04 |
mordred | it was a fun one | 19:04 |
mordred | everyone should marvel at its wonder | 19:04 |
fungi | i haven't gone back to see if the recently added projects are updated yet | 19:04 |
clarkb | huh how did that sneak in | 19:05 |
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:05 | |
mordred | clarkb: it came in during the exception error cleanup | 19:05 |
clarkb | ah | 19:05 |
*** thedodd has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:05 | |
mordred | and it's one of those places where the backwards logic makes your head spin | 19:05 |
* anteaya marvels | 19:05 | |
clarkb | mordred: go bourne? | 19:05 |
mordred | clarkb: :) | 19:06 |
fungi | also there's still an open review to add some extra race safety around acl creation... no idea if it's actually needed any longer | 19:06 |
fungi | #link https://review.openstack.org/94684 | 19:06 |
fungi | anything else to cover on this before i move to the next topic? | 19:06 |
*** luis_ has quit IRC | 19:07 | |
clarkb | fungi: I think we can be defensive and mrege that change | 19:07 |
fungi | #topic Review proposal to move Activity Board fully under openstack-infra (reed) | 19:07 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Review proposal to move Activity Board fully under openstack-infra (reed) (Meeting topic: infra)" | 19:07 | |
clarkb | I will rereview | 19:07 |
*** sarob has quit IRC | 19:07 | |
fungi | thx | 19:07 |
fungi | #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-infra/2014-June/001292.html | 19:07 |
*** emaganap has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:07 | |
*** aburaschi has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:08 | |
fungi | reed: apologies for not following up yet. it's been a crazy week. i think mordred replied a couple times on that thread though | 19:08 |
*** jang has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:08 | |
mordred | I have. I think we're making progress in the thread | 19:08 |
reed | #info the gist of it is that we're going to need assistance in order to achieve that. Bitergia is not self-sufficient and being an external provider it may become quite expensive. | 19:08 |
mordred | I think we can make the puppet without problems, I read through their docs | 19:08 |
mordred | but I think we may need slightly more detailed install instructions from them | 19:08 |
*** rdopieralski has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:09 | |
rdopieralski | hi | 19:09 |
reed | mordred: i think so too, the basic install shouldn't be too complicated | 19:09 |
mordred | the stackalytics install instructions I referenced are a great example of about the level of detail we need | 19:09 |
reed | I'll have them provide those | 19:09 |
fungi | rdopieralski: welcome... you haven't missed your topic yet, so just hang in there | 19:09 |
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:09 | |
mordred | reed: it took me about an hour to puppet stackalytics, so I dont' think it'll take long to do activity board | 19:09 |
rdopieralski | fungi: thank you | 19:10 |
*** erecio has quit IRC | 19:10 | |
reed | there are other 'puppetification' jobs we need to do, too, askbot for example | 19:10 |
clarkb | mordred: cool | 19:10 |
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:10 | |
clarkb | reed: ugh | 19:10 |
*** emagana has quit IRC | 19:10 | |
clarkb | reed: as long as I don't have to do it <_< | 19:10 |
mordred | clarkb: askbot might not be as bad anymore since we've got postgres in puppet at this point | 19:10 |
mordred | although it woudl be eversonice if it would run on mysql so we could use rax cloud dbs | 19:10 |
*** erecio has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:11 | |
reed | clarkb, and this time we have the head developer on board :) | 19:11 |
clarkb | I mean yes we could just postgres it | 19:11 |
mordred | ++ | 19:11 |
reed | Evgeny agreed that it would be a good idea to do it | 19:11 |
mordred | let's get activity done first | 19:11 |
clarkb | ++ | 19:11 |
*** marcoemorais has quit IRC | 19:11 | |
*** marcoemorais has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:11 | |
reed | yes, I agree, activity first because it's 1) easier and 2) askbot requires a bit more thoughts on a more resilient architecture, too | 19:12 |
fungi | mordred: i'm still a little twitchy about rackspace's trove service since it's query socket is accessible from all tenants in the same region... we might want to hold off putting more stuff in it until we get a better comfort level for that | 19:12 |
*** marcoemorais has quit IRC | 19:12 | |
*** marcoemorais has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:12 | |
*** emagana has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:12 | |
mordred | fungi: we can get iccha1 to fix that now! | 19:13 |
reed | #task reed to ask Bitergia to provide detailed instructions to run the grimoire suite | 19:13 |
fungi | (though it sounds like neutron is needed to be able to address it) | 19:13 |
*** Michalik_ has quit IRC | 19:13 | |
mordred | fungi: several things are needed I believe, but yeah | 19:13 |
reed | next topic? | 19:13 |
mordred | fungi: we could always move to just running our own galera cluster in which all of our dbs lay with ssl cert-based auth ... | 19:14 |
* mordred shuts up | 19:14 | |
fungi | #topic Review proposal towards a better integration of gerrit and openstack people db (reed) | 19:14 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Review proposal towards a better integration of gerrit and openstack people db (reed) (Meeting topic: infra)" | 19:14 | |
fungi | #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-infra/2014-June/001297.html | 19:14 |
fungi | another awesome e-mail i'm sorry i haven't replied to yet. it's flagged for attention still :/ | 19:14 |
reed | so, this one is detailed in a blog post by me, etherpad and blueprint | 19:14 |
reed | no problem | 19:14 |
reed | the TL;DR version: | 19:15 |
reed | we're going to build a directory of people involved in openstack | 19:15 |
*** emaganap has quit IRC | 19:15 | |
*** yogeshmehra has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:15 | |
reed | built on top of the current 'members' database, and exposing OpenID services | 19:16 |
morganfainberg | yeah. | 19:16 |
anteaya | please no pictures | 19:16 |
morganfainberg | that was a topic from the summit | 19:16 |
reed | the database will not be of Foundation members | 19:16 |
morganfainberg | this is the replacement for LP SSO right? | 19:16 |
*** balajiiyer has left #openstack-meeting | 19:16 | |
reed | not only, at least, multiple roles are envisioned | 19:16 |
fungi | morganfainberg: right, and more | 19:16 |
morganfainberg | well one of the roles. | 19:16 |
reed | morganfainberg, yes, also | 19:16 |
morganfainberg | yep | 19:16 |
morganfainberg | as i said at the summit, count me on this front. ahppy to help | 19:17 |
mordred | woot | 19:17 |
clarkb | one concern on my end is we need to make sure doing something other than openid is feasible | 19:17 |
reed | Right now we have members==developers, speakers, voters to talks and a few other smaller roles | 19:17 |
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC | 19:17 | |
anteaya | clarkb: ++ | 19:17 |
morganfainberg | unfortunately ubuntu running freeipa (longer view) wont... really occur, though fedora if could [again if we wanted to move away from the peopledb info] | 19:17 |
reed | clarkb, why? until now I have insisted on openid because my understanding is that gerrit won't do anything but openid | 19:18 |
morganfainberg | s/if/it | 19:18 |
anteaya | since gerrit is changing its auth strategy | 19:18 |
morganfainberg | clarkb, what auth strategies do we need? | 19:18 |
clarkb | reed: gerrit is potentialyl removing openid | 19:18 |
mordred | reed: gerrit will also do ldap - and yes, upstream gerrit is starting to want to make openid go away | 19:18 |
* reed yells at the cloud | 19:18 | |
clarkb | mordred and zaro have pinged them and it looks like we may get an openid plugin | 19:18 |
mordred | morganfainberg: I thought freeipa on ubuntu was coming? | 19:18 |
clarkb | but I wasn't super convinced given spearce's stance | 19:18 |
mordred | clarkb: awesome | 19:18 |
morganfainberg | ok LDAP is easy | 19:18 |
morganfainberg | mordred, it's... slow | 19:18 |
reed | ldap is crap | 19:19 |
morganfainberg | mordred, i'm still trying to lean on people to get resources | 19:19 |
*** Michalik_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:19 | |
clarkb | I think starting with openid is great | 19:19 |
mordred | reed: well, let's not go to the "is crap" place just yet | 19:19 |
clarkb | we have openid today and will have it tomorrow | 19:19 |
mordred | clarkb: ++ | 19:19 |
morganfainberg | mordred, but it's hard to get commitment on it. | 19:19 |
reed | anyway, this is largely independent from the crap we have to deal with :) | 19:19 |
clarkb | just keep in mind that openid may not be the only thing we need to do | 19:19 |
mordred | reed: yes | 19:19 |
*** Michalik_ has quit IRC | 19:19 | |
fungi | gerrit will actually do other things besides openid now and has for a while (for example ldap) | 19:19 |
morganfainberg | mordred, it might be if we do FreeIPA we run fedora for those boxen until ubutnu is stable+happy | 19:19 |
reed | currently the OpenID service is just a php app built on top of a couple of database tables | 19:19 |
morganfainberg | it's coming, just might be longer than this dev cycle | 19:20 |
mordred | I think clarkb's point is excellent - in making the db, we should keep in mind we might want to put more than one access method on top of it | 19:20 |
*** Michalik_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:20 | |
mordred | morganfainberg: well ... our biggest problem is the fedora lifecycle - but we can come back to that | 19:20 |
fungi | but yes, i agree that openid is a good initial target and then we just need to make sure it's not designed to make it harder than necessary to hook in other protocols later as needed | 19:20 |
reed | now, the reason for this topic in the agenda is that I'd like to make sure that we design the tables and the database to keep into account all of the things that gerrit needs | 19:20 |
morganfainberg | reed, there was some desire to not use the people db info directly, some data that shouldn't be used? | 19:20 |
morganfainberg | i think i remember | 19:20 |
*** VijayB_ has quit IRC | 19:21 | |
reed | morganfainberg, not sure I follow... do you remember something more? | 19:21 |
mordred | reed, morganfainberg: I believe they were talking about wanting to be able to split the db into people db and then also some of the info that the foundation might need that the project might not want access to | 19:21 |
morganfainberg | reed, there was extra data in the people db there was concern about exposing | 19:21 |
mordred | that ^^ | 19:21 |
reed | right ... | 19:21 |
reed | the DB itself won't be publicly available, ever, there are personal data in there that we're not allowed to share | 19:21 |
mordred | because ultimately we want to be able to operate the people db in infra, but we don't want to have secrets in there that it would be inappropriate for infra to be privy to | 19:22 |
morganfainberg | mordred, ++ | 19:22 |
fungi | yeah, separation of concerns... not just dumping it all together | 19:22 |
*** amotoki has quit IRC | 19:22 | |
reed | right now running the people DB in infra is not an option | 19:22 |
fungi | agreed | 19:22 |
morganfainberg | it might make sense to separate concerns and sync the important infra-safe info to the new db somehow? | 19:22 |
morganfainberg | to begin with. | 19:22 |
morganfainberg | or is that biting off too much/boiling the ocean | 19:22 |
*** VijayB has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:23 | |
reed | morganfainberg, boiling :) | 19:23 |
fungi | from what i understand more refactoring of the current database is needed to separate out authentication and basic account info from foundation membership stuff | 19:23 |
*** gyee has quit IRC | 19:23 | |
reed | fungi, exactly | 19:23 |
morganfainberg | reed, fair enough. lets use what we have and then work on a split. | 19:23 |
*** VijayB has quit IRC | 19:23 | |
*** vivek-ebay has quit IRC | 19:24 | |
fungi | the idea i think is that we get a toehold by running the openid service connecting to the current database with some constraints on the db server end and then try to get a new authentication/accounts db separate from it running in parallel | 19:24 |
reed | new database will need to have all the details for gerrit to authorize commits, and contain also status about each person: is that person a developer? a speaker? something else? | 19:24 |
fungi | the migration could be piecemeal if we do it carefully | 19:24 |
morganfainberg | fungi, ++ | 19:24 |
morganfainberg | reed, i'd like to circle back on that and see about something like FreeIPA (if possible) when we split vs. just-another-SQL-back-end | 19:24 |
reed | this is also an attempt at simplyfing *a lot* the onboarding of new developers | 19:24 |
clarkb | is the intent to keep the existing HTTP request to db get back 200 for signed CLA? | 19:25 |
clarkb | er keep that process? | 19:25 |
clarkb | in that case gerrit doesn't need to know anything really | 19:25 |
fungi | clarkb: i think we should be able to replace that | 19:25 |
clarkb | fungi: how? | 19:25 |
reed | clarkb, not if we can make it better | 19:25 |
clarkb | I think I am missing that important piece | 19:25 |
* mordred is too | 19:25 | |
mordred | fungi: can you splain? | 19:25 |
clarkb | if we do have this magical pony | 19:25 |
clarkb | how do we interact with it? because that will help determine the size and shape of this thing | 19:26 |
mordred | ++ | 19:26 |
fungi | clarkb: leave the cla signing in but drop the contactstore connection. instead the openid data should be sufficient to (hopefully) marry to group membership api calls now that those exist and now that all clas in current gerrit are group-based not tracked in separate tables | 19:26 |
reed | we want to get to a place where openstackid.org shows profile pages for each person involved in openstack | 19:26 |
*** kristysiu has quit IRC | 19:26 | |
*** afazekas has quit IRC | 19:26 | |
mordred | fungi: you're suggesting that the openid thing simply doesn't auth if the person doesn't have the CLA? | 19:27 |
reed | person creates an account, goes to groups.openstack.org, checks things there... | 19:27 |
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:27 | |
fungi | mordred: no, not at all suggesting that | 19:27 |
reed | maybe later signs the CLA, commits code, maybe later becomes a member of the foundation, a speaker... etc | 19:27 |
reed | all with one identity managed by us | 19:27 |
*** sweston has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:27 | |
clarkb | fungi: so we would be going back to syncing against an openid service? | 19:28 |
morganfainberg | reed, so o.o properties would be SSO to this system | 19:28 |
mordred | ok. I get all that. I have two questions that I would like asnwered | 19:28 |
fungi | mordred: suggesting that the reason we did the contactstore thing was twofold... to make sure the contributor was a foundation member first and to track the correlation to their gerrit account (the latter of which was never done entirely properly anyway) | 19:28 |
clarkb | fungi: just with API calls isntead of direct DB manipulation? | 19:28 |
*** ramishra has quit IRC | 19:28 | |
fungi | but for anyone to sign the cla in gerrit, they have to log into gerrit, which now means they have an openid account in our openid provider | 19:28 |
reed | morganfainberg, SSO would be cool but until now, all the design choices depend on what gerrit provides... openid I was told and openid I had implemented | 19:28 |
morganfainberg | reed, sure. | 19:28 |
mordred | fungi: ah. ok | 19:28 |
fungi | clarkb: syncing? not needed this way as far as i know | 19:29 |
clarkb | fungi: I see so we would purely rely on the data provided by openid | 19:29 |
mordred | fungi: so how does the foundation get information that a user has signed the CLA? | 19:29 |
reed | mordred: right nkow the foundation doesn't know that | 19:29 |
fungi | gerrit handles cla signing and enforcement. it auto-adds users to per-cla gerrit groups now. there is also an api call to enumerate group members in gerrit | 19:29 |
mordred | ok | 19:29 |
clarkb | so we would sync the other direction and that is where the APIs come into play | 19:30 |
*** sweston has quit IRC | 19:30 | |
fungi | yep | 19:30 |
reed | mordred: in fact, the foundation needs to query gerrit directly to find the list of ATCs | 19:30 |
*** novas0x2a|laptop has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:30 | |
mordred | seems fine to me | 19:30 |
fungi | the foundation can, when and as often as it wants, query gerrit to find out who's signed the cla | 19:30 |
mordred | I like it | 19:30 |
clarkb | ya I think that should work fine | 19:30 |
fungi | via a rest api now even | 19:30 |
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:31 | |
fungi | so between having openid authentication info and the cla lookups, the foundation can correlate whatever they need | 19:31 |
mordred | ++ | 19:31 |
fungi | where gerrit is concerned | 19:31 |
*** amcrn has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:31 | |
clarkb | so the data would be whatever gerrit thinks it should know about at https://review.openstack.org/#/settings/ and https://review.openstack.org/#/settings/contact | 19:32 |
anteaya | much better relationship | 19:32 |
reed | indeed, instead of counting on email lookups that sometimes fail with obscure error messages | 19:32 |
fungi | clarkb: so the outstanding question which someone hopefully finds time to look into soon is how much gerrit will import from openid. i know it does e-mail address and username... | 19:33 |
*** pdmars_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:33 | |
fungi | i suspect it does not do group membership updates from openid, but hopefully we don't need that | 19:33 |
reed | the process to onboard a new developer will be extremely linear, no back and forth between 3 accounts | 19:33 |
mordred | group memberships is an openid extension | 19:33 |
reed | fungi, gerrit may not need to know about that... | 19:34 |
mordred | gerrit does not consume it - launchpad provided it but we had to do that db sync script hell to get group info | 19:34 |
fungi | yeah, and one i'm assuming gerrit doesn't make use of | 19:34 |
*** malini2 has quit IRC | 19:34 | |
clarkb | which should be fine | 19:34 |
morganfainberg | sounds like a question for zaro | 19:34 |
fungi | right, that 'splains why we didn't make use of it for gerrit | 19:34 |
reed | are you talking about groups as in 'programs'? | 19:34 |
fungi | reed: agreed | 19:34 |
morganfainberg | but, i don't think gerrit does consume that | 19:34 |
clarkb | it keeps gerrit group membership in gerrit rather than cores needing to use $thingoverthere to manage the groups | 19:34 |
mordred | yup | 19:34 |
*** jtomasek has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:34 | |
fungi | reed: no, meaning if we wanted to control things like acls via group membership managed from the openid end rather than directly in gerrit, but probably not necessary or even desirable anyway | 19:35 |
reed | let's be clear: when I talk about 'groups' in the openid (let's call it this way at the moment) is more similar to 'affiliation' | 19:35 |
*** ramashri has quit IRC | 19:35 | |
mordred | like, "Monty works for HP" | 19:35 |
clarkb | ya I don't think it is desireable | 19:35 |
mordred | not "Monty is Infra Cre" | 19:35 |
fungi | right, so not a concern | 19:35 |
mordred | s/re/ore/ | 19:35 |
mordred | ++ | 19:35 |
*** pdmars has quit IRC | 19:35 | |
zaro | morganfainberg: sorry i don't know, would need to dig. | 19:36 |
mordred | it will be data that things like stackalytics and activity board could mine | 19:36 |
*** dshurtle has quit IRC | 19:36 | |
reed | mordred: right, we want to have the manager of a team specify who works for him/her on the 'People Directory' | 19:36 |
* reed notes that this thing needs a name | 19:36 | |
morganfainberg | zaro, no worries. sounds like it's a non-issue | 19:36 |
*** jmontemayor has quit IRC | 19:36 | |
anteaya | really? | 19:36 |
anteaya | we want work organization trees? | 19:36 |
anteaya | or openstack organization trees? | 19:36 |
fungi | anteaya: for tracking the corporate cla | 19:36 |
anteaya | oh | 19:36 |
reed | anteaya, yes, for a couple of reasons | 19:36 |
mordred | reed: biggest thing I think we need there so that the reporting thigns can do the right thing... | 19:37 |
reed | CCLA is one, reporting is another | 19:37 |
fungi | but also for member company contribution metrics in aggregate | 19:37 |
mordred | reed: is making sure we're keeping data-warehouse style data ranges for affiliations | 19:37 |
reed | mordred: next step will be to have an API service on top of this database | 19:37 |
anteaya | k | 19:37 |
reed | an API that stackalytics, git-dm, bitergia and the world can query | 19:38 |
reed | we'll have to sit down and design that | 19:38 |
morganfainberg | reed, so, the READ part of CRUD | 19:38 |
anteaya | I like that someone can change call signs and it makes no nevermind to the rest of us | 19:38 |
*** nealph has quit IRC | 19:38 | |
reed | morganfainberg, indeed | 19:39 |
reed | so, how do we proceed? | 19:39 |
fungi | anteaya: yes, but large companies donating funds and people to the effort want to be able to show the "money people" what they're accomplishing with that | 19:39 |
reed | the blueprint and spec need feedback | 19:39 |
anteaya | fungi: true, they do | 19:39 |
anteaya | did the inital spec commit merge yet? | 19:39 |
morganfainberg | reed, have links for those handy? (i can look up if not) | 19:39 |
fungi | anteaya: i should have put that on the agenda. inserting it as a quick topic now | 19:40 |
anteaya | thanks | 19:40 |
reed | morganfainberg, from the email: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-infra/2014-June/001297.html | 19:40 |
morganfainberg | reed, tyvm | 19:40 |
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC | 19:40 | |
*** bknudson has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:40 | |
*** emagana has quit IRC | 19:41 | |
*** emagana has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:41 | |
*** sarob has quit IRC | 19:42 | |
*** emagana has quit IRC | 19:42 | |
fungi | okay, so anything else on that? we've got about 15 minutes left | 19:42 |
fungi | was definitely good to get an update and call to action there | 19:42 |
reed | fungi, I'm good, as long as I get comments on the blueprint :) | 19:42 |
*** emagana has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:43 | |
fungi | yes, i will make a note to provide some feedback, please everyone with interest do the same | 19:43 |
fungi | #topic Infra specs (fungi) | 19:43 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Infra specs (fungi) (Meeting topic: infra)" | 19:43 | |
fungi | #link https://review.openstack.org/94440 | 19:43 |
fungi | please let's get this put to bed. there are now numerous specs changes waiting on it | 19:43 |
anteaya | yes | 19:43 |
anteaya | do merge | 19:43 |
*** vivek-ebay has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:44 | |
anteaya | then we can look at other specs | 19:44 |
fungi | mordred: clarkb: jhesketh: please weigh in on that | 19:44 |
clarkb | fungi: I mean I weighed in, it won't work :P | 19:44 |
*** zdiN0bot has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:44 | |
clarkb | fungi: should we just go ahead and address comments and shove it through? | 19:44 |
SergeyLukjanov | ++ for merging | 19:44 |
SergeyLukjanov | :) | 19:44 |
morganfainberg | as somethng keystone just went through, have you decided what the spec approval process is? standard +2/+2/+A? | 19:44 |
morganfainberg | just so there isn't a question when it comes time to approve specs. | 19:45 |
fungi | clarkb: i think so, if the comments are blockers | 19:45 |
clarkb | fungi: not being able to build the resulting document seems like a blocker to me but I didn't -1 because you can still review specs without it | 19:45 |
mordred | clarkb: the doc doesn't build? | 19:45 |
fungi | yeah, we're not yet publishing them other than as drafts anyway, so i wasn't too worried about it, but it's trivial to fix | 19:45 |
clarkb | mordred: see my comment, it won't find docs under subdirs like implemented/ | 19:46 |
anteaya | +1 address comments and shove it though | 19:46 |
fungi | #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/94440/3/doc/source/index.rst | 19:46 |
fungi | for clark's concern | 19:46 |
mordred | clarkb: lemme pull it then - I hacked on the heat one to fix its doc build | 19:46 |
*** nedbat_ has quit IRC | 19:46 | |
mordred | oh - or your thing | 19:46 |
fungi | anyway, didn't want to take up too much time with this topic, just wanted to make sure to get it on everyone's radar | 19:46 |
mordred | yeah. I'll go look at it. | 19:46 |
clarkb | mordred: are you volunteering to fix the issues real quick? | 19:47 |
*** nedbat has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:47 | |
anteaya | fix and merge is my stance | 19:47 |
clarkb | I don't think there is anything contentious just details needed to make it work properly | 19:47 |
mordred | clarkb: I'm volunteering to think about it | 19:47 |
mordred | :) | 19:47 |
clarkb | :) ok | 19:47 |
*** nedbat has quit IRC | 19:47 | |
fungi | #topic Request for comments on the horizon split plan (rdopiera) | 19:47 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Request for comments on the horizon split plan (rdopiera) (Meeting topic: infra)" | 19:47 | |
fungi | #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/horizon-split-plan | 19:47 |
*** nedbat has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:47 | |
*** thedodd has quit IRC | 19:47 | |
mordred | I, for one, welcome our new split horizon overlords | 19:47 |
morganfainberg | mordred, ++ | 19:48 |
fungi | this seems to have been fleshed out a lot more now | 19:48 |
anteaya | rdopieralski: my comment is the same one I made on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/95716/ | 19:48 |
fungi | i tried to keep up with the related threads on the -dev ml but probably missed some of the issues | 19:48 |
rdopieralski | anteaya: yes, I will make a new group for that | 19:48 |
*** jmontemayor has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:48 | |
mordred | " in horizon, add django_horizon to requirements.txt, as -e path-to-the-repo" | 19:48 |
rdopieralski | anteaya: thank you | 19:48 |
anteaya | rdopieralski: I agree with markmc that expecting core to admin 16 repos in stackforge is odd | 19:48 |
mordred | please no | 19:48 |
anteaya | rdopieralski: k, thanks | 19:48 |
*** noslzzp has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:49 | |
mordred | that needs to be as a refernce to the master tarball on tarballs.o.o | 19:49 |
rdopieralski | mordred: great, thank you | 19:49 |
mordred | (updated etherpad) | 19:49 |
rdopieralski | awesome | 19:49 |
fungi | what needs to be discussed here, other than making sure we're all aware this is coming? (i know the new name for the split-out half hasn't been settled yet at least) | 19:49 |
mordred | seems straightforward to me | 19:50 |
anteaya | poll is open: http://civs.cs.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/vote.pl?id=E_ea99af9511f3f255&akey=e4c064fca36f8d26 | 19:50 |
*** thedodd has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:50 | |
clarkb | anteaya: were those names vetted first? | 19:50 |
*** kun_huang has quit IRC | 19:50 | |
clarkb | we seem to have a really hard time doing that | 19:50 |
mordred | yeah. that was my question | 19:50 |
*** luis_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:50 | |
anteaya | rdopieralski's email has the process | 19:50 |
rdopieralski | fungi: I mostly wanted you to look at it and catch any obvious blunders, like you just did | 19:50 |
fungi | clarkb: i asked, sounds like the top several will get sent to the foundation for vetting | 19:50 |
pleia2 | one landed on the -infra list, but it was moderated so I was able to reject it | 19:50 |
pleia2 | (one == a ballot) | 19:51 |
*** caleb_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:51 | |
*** trey_h has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:51 | |
fungi | clarkb: mordred: vetting 18 would be a bit of a waste of time | 19:51 |
clarkb | fungi: right but a human can use the googles before hand | 19:51 |
rdopieralski | I would also want, if possible, to ask someone of you to volunteer in helping with it | 19:51 |
clarkb | fungi: which would have caught every other rename we have had to do | 19:51 |
mordred | please let schwartzchild win | 19:51 |
rdopieralski | during the freeze itself | 19:51 |
anteaya | http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-June/037185.html | 19:51 |
*** Macaveli has quit IRC | 19:51 | |
fungi | clarkb: true. the degree to which anyone has is unknown | 19:51 |
*** e0ne has quit IRC | 19:51 | |
fungi | to me anyway | 19:51 |
rdopieralski | but we don't have a date for that yet, so it may be too early | 19:51 |
fungi | rdopieralski: yeah, once we know when you'll be ready, it'll be easier to rally the troops on it | 19:52 |
anteaya | rdopieralski: helping with what? with the vetting of names? | 19:52 |
morganfainberg | mordred, there is a t missing in the poll option compared to what you typed. "schwarzchild" vs "schwartzchild" | 19:52 |
clarkb | https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/products/technologies/panorama.html | 19:52 |
rdopieralski | anteaya: nah, with the actual split | 19:52 |
anteaya | rdopieralski: oh the split | 19:52 |
morganfainberg | is that supposed to be schwartzchild instead? | 19:52 |
rdopieralski | morganfainberg: possibly | 19:53 |
clarkb | a quick googling should be able to exclude blatant problems... | 19:53 |
rdopieralski | I just copied it from the etherpad :P | 19:53 |
morganfainberg | rdopieralski, probably a typo ... it looks... off | 19:53 |
*** eglynn has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:53 | |
* morganfainberg shrugs | 19:53 | |
*** eglynn is now known as eglynn-afk | 19:53 | |
fungi | morganfainberg: no, http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CB8QFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FSchwarzschild_radius&ei=SWKXU-bYMrCisATqtoGwDQ&usg=AFQjCNFL3m870AJgoy-enNcbYecDseUeew&sig2=VLmoF4rk51OcChUoTZUynw | 19:54 |
fungi | er | 19:54 |
fungi | http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schwarzschild_radius | 19:54 |
morganfainberg | fungi, oh ok. | 19:54 |
morganfainberg | works for me | 19:54 |
fungi | (a nod to the event _horizon_) | 19:54 |
morganfainberg | yep yep | 19:54 |
anteaya | can I get a few minutes, I just need folks to agree I am doing the right thing with templates | 19:54 |
fungi | at least that's my assumption | 19:54 |
fungi | anteaya: yep | 19:54 |
fungi | rdopieralski: anything else? | 19:54 |
rdopieralski | fungi: that's all, thank you | 19:55 |
fungi | #topic Review Third Party wiki templates - seed pages (anteaya) | 19:55 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Review Third Party wiki templates - seed pages (anteaya) (Meeting topic: infra)" | 19:55 | |
anteaya | thanks | 19:55 |
fungi | you have the floor ;) | 19:55 |
mordred | morganfainberg: :) | 19:55 |
anteaya | so we have been progressing through third party templates | 19:55 |
anteaya | and i have some to look at | 19:55 |
anteaya | #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ThirdPartySystems/IBMPowerKVMCI | 19:55 |
*** marun_afk is now known as marun | 19:55 | |
anteaya | #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ThirdPartySystems/OpenStack-Neutron | 19:56 |
anteaya | please share your feedback | 19:56 |
anteaya | are we happy yet? do we want them all to use this format? | 19:56 |
anteaya | anything missing? | 19:56 |
fungi | anteaya: well, the example demonstrates that intent and focus may be redundant concepts | 19:56 |
*** raildo has left #openstack-meeting | 19:56 | |
fungi | but beyond that, fine with me | 19:56 |
anteaya | okay, which should we keep, intent? | 19:57 |
anteaya | and thanks | 19:57 |
anteaya | or do we like focus better? | 19:57 |
clarkb | it might be more readable as a more normal wiki page but then you will probably have drift | 19:57 |
reed | anteaya, how hard is it to make the line "3rd party system: IBM PowerKVM CI" more prominent? | 19:57 |
*** marcoemorais has quit IRC | 19:57 | |
fungi | i'm also marginally unsure how we want to translate openstack programs to the per-project acls we talked about setting up (all projects in the listed program, or only some projects in a program allow any third-party voting?) | 19:57 |
anteaya | reed: I can work for that, what do you want, larger font? more space around it? | 19:58 |
ianw | "current status" seems like something that will get out of date and not always reflect reality | 19:58 |
*** marcoemorais has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:58 | |
reed | where are these templates going to be shown? on individual pages or as a 'sidebox' embedded in other pages? | 19:58 |
anteaya | fungi: yes, that does present an issue needing discussion | 19:58 |
reed | not clear to me the scope of this effort to be able to comment... but since I love templates :) | 19:58 |
clarkb | fungi: I think we go with all projects | 19:58 |
clarkb | fungi: its too complicated otherwise | 19:58 |
fungi | ianw: i think the hope is that it gets updated by the owners of that account when it breaks, as an indicator to everyone that they know it's broken | 19:59 |
*** devlaps1 has quit IRC | 19:59 | |
fungi | clarkb: yeah, agreed. all projects in a given program get an acl stanza allowing that vote | 19:59 |
clarkb | so you have compute-ci network-ci et al as groups owned by nova-ptl neutron-ptl | 19:59 |
fungi | anteaya: did you need to hit your other topic too? 30 seconds | 19:59 |
anteaya | line 11 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/automated-gerrit-account-naming-format | 19:59 |
*** malini1 has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:59 | |
fungi | #topic Formatting Automated Gerrit Account Names (anteaya) | 20:00 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Formatting Automated Gerrit Account Names (anteaya) (Meeting topic: infra)" | 20:00 | |
reed | anteaya, that first line with a larger font, like an h3 level or something similar would be better... right now the pages as they are displayed now are not very clear to me (but I may be the wrong audience) | 20:00 |
anteaya | can we live with that as an automated gerrit naming format? | 20:00 |
fungi | #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/automated-gerrit-account-naming-format | 20:00 |
anteaya | reed: you are the right audience, will look at that | 20:00 |
*** devlaps has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:00 | |
*** markmc has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:00 | |
*** caleb_ has quit IRC | 20:00 | |
*** rdopieralski has quit IRC | 20:00 | |
anteaya | lines 11-16 is the proposed format | 20:00 |
*** sushils_ has quit IRC | 20:00 | |
*** jaypipes has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:00 | |
fungi | anteaya: seems fine to me | 20:00 |
fungi | also we're running over | 20:00 |
anteaya | do we need more discussion or can i publish? | 20:00 |
*** vinod has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:00 | |
anteaya | kk | 20:01 |
anteaya | done | 20:01 |
clarkb | I don't want to change usernames | 20:01 |
clarkb | but we can talk over there -> | 20:01 |
anteaya | clarkb: just asking about format guidelines atm | 20:01 |
fungi | clarkb: i think we had decided we only change new usernames, not existing ones | 20:01 |
fungi | and we change existing and new display names | 20:01 |
markmc | "time now, folks. time now" | 20:01 |
fungi | anyway, ttx is going to get mad at me | 20:01 |
fungi | #endmeeting | 20:01 |
ttx | not at all | 20:01 |
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings" | 20:01 | |
*** sushils_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:01 | |
openstack | Meeting ended Tue Jun 10 20:01:44 2014 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 20:01 |
openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/infra/2014/infra.2014-06-10-19.02.html | 20:01 |
openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/infra/2014/infra.2014-06-10-19.02.txt | 20:01 |
openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/infra/2014/infra.2014-06-10-19.02.log.html | 20:01 |
ttx | Anyone around for the TC meeting ? | 20:01 |
markmc | hey | 20:01 |
dhellmann | o/ | 20:01 |
vishy | o/ | 20:01 |
* jaypipes gets Internet just in the nick of time... | 20:02 | |
reed | ttx is mad already | 20:02 |
Kiall | o/ | 20:02 |
mikal | Morning | 20:02 |
* fungi standing in for jeblair | 20:02 | |
anteaya | o/ | 20:02 |
devananda | o/ | 20:02 |
jaypipes | o/ | 20:02 |
* morganfainberg lurks. | 20:02 | |
russellb | o/ | 20:02 |
mugsie | o/ | 20:02 |
annegentle | hoo hoo | 20:02 |
*** iron1 has quit IRC | 20:02 | |
vinod | o/ | 20:02 |
mordred | o/ | 20:02 |
mordred | o/ | 20:02 |
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:02 | |
ttx | markmcclain, sdague : around ? | 20:02 |
markmcclain | o/ | 20:03 |
ttx | Almost everyone today! | 20:03 |
markwash | o/ | 20:03 |
ttx | #startmeeting tc | 20:03 |
openstack | Meeting started Tue Jun 10 20:03:07 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is ttx. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 20:03 |
openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 20:03 |
ttx | Here is our agenda for today: | 20:03 |
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: tc)" | 20:03 | |
openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'tc' | 20:03 |
*** tsimmons has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:03 | |
ttx | #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/TechnicalCommittee | 20:03 |
ttx | #topic Glance Program Mission Statement and the Catalog | 20:03 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Glance Program Mission Statement and the Catalog (Meeting topic: tc)" | 20:03 | |
ttx | markwash: o/ | 20:03 |
ttx | #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-June/036767.html | 20:03 |
markwash | hi hi | 20:03 |
ttx | Overdue original mission is proposed at: | 20:03 |
ttx | #link https://review.openstack.org/98001 | 20:03 |
ttx | I think we should approve that one now and then discuss the real proposed change: | 20:03 |
ttx | #link https://review.openstack.org/98002 | 20:04 |
*** vkmc has quit IRC | 20:04 | |
ttx | Unless there is strong objection on the 98001 "original" wording | 20:04 |
annegentle | heh I wasn't gonna nitpick 98001 but I like the serial comma in 98002's list | 20:04 |
* devananda adds +1 to the first review | 20:04 | |
annegentle | but I can wait for the second | 20:04 |
*** VijayB has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:05 | |
markwash | annegentle: ugh I missed that! I love the oxford comma | 20:05 |
ttx | 7 YES, I can approve now unless someone objects | 20:05 |
russellb | <3 oxford comma | 20:05 |
mikal | I like cheese | 20:05 |
fungi | i've commented a vote in favor on jeblair's behalf, since it lgtm | 20:05 |
markwash | (commas matter. "Let's eat, grampa!") | 20:05 |
ttx | Ok let's approve it | 20:06 |
dhellmann | mmm, delicious | 20:06 |
annegentle | markwash: mikal: snort | 20:06 |
*** changbl has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:06 | |
mordred | yummy salty human flesh... | 20:06 |
*** jaycaz has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:06 | |
ttx | That should facilitate discussion on 98002 | 20:06 |
sdague | ttx here now | 20:06 |
*** Haneef has quit IRC | 20:06 | |
ttx | ok, 98001 merged | 20:06 |
*** VijayB has quit IRC | 20:06 | |
ttx | Now on to 98002 | 20:06 |
*** betsy has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:06 | |
ttx | markwash: could you provide examples of other artifact types that would make sense for storage into the new Glance ? | 20:07 |
* devananda notes the lengthy discussions on rev2 of 98002, starts catching up | 20:07 | |
markwash | so part of it is breaking up the idea of image so that it is more usable and interoperable for example | 20:07 |
markmc | yes, maybe start with concrete example of why the mission needs expanding | 20:07 |
* dhellmann went a little too far stripping out implementation details in his proposed revision | 20:07 | |
markwash | so instead of just "image" | 20:07 |
markwash | we could have an artifact for disk images and artifacts for the full arrangement of device mappings | 20:07 |
markwash | another popular example is pretty much anything that can go in a heat template | 20:08 |
zaneb | heat and murano templates are another obvious one | 20:08 |
gokrokve | Solum LP | 20:08 |
markwash | and the examples that seemed to push this to the fore were murano packages and something something solum | 20:08 |
mikal | markwash: why be an artifact store at all? | 20:08 |
markwash | :-) | 20:08 |
ttx | markwash: ok | 20:08 |
mikal | markwash: couldn't you just be a catalog of artifacts stored elsewhere? | 20:08 |
dhellmann | why do those things need to go in glance, though? why shouldn't they go in the heat database? | 20:08 |
ttx | mikal: it's what it is actually | 20:08 |
*** vkmc has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:08 | |
markwash | mikal: actually that's what we want to be | 20:08 |
dhellmann | ah, ok, we should take out "store" then :-) | 20:09 |
markwash | mikal except glance has to own stuff in order to guarantee integrity | 20:09 |
zaneb | dhellmann: because we don't want to implement a catalog service in heat | 20:09 |
mikal | markwash: sure | 20:09 |
russellb | a registry of things, their type, and location, right? | 20:09 |
markwash | so if we can't own it without storing it, we'll store it | 20:09 |
fungi | should glance become the heat database? ;) | 20:09 |
devananda | markwash: so the artefacts may be stored, essentially, anywhere - and glance would just provide the browsability? | 20:09 |
mikal | So... does that mean that a key store is just a special case of glance now? | 20:09 |
jaypipes | glance stores the archetypes, other projects store the artifacts themselves? | 20:09 |
russellb | mikal: i think keys are one exception | 20:09 |
mikal | russellb: why? | 20:09 |
devananda | russellb: why? | 20:09 |
markwash | again, we *own* it so we will continue to store everything we have to in order to completely control access | 20:09 |
russellb | mikal: since we said keys justify special handling (around security, compliance) | 20:09 |
russellb | that's why we allowed a special program for key handling | 20:10 |
dhellmann | zaneb: why do you need a catalog service to store templates? we don't need one to store most of the rest of the stuff we store? (serious question about the difference) | 20:10 |
zaneb | dhellmann: basically for the same reason we need one for images | 20:10 |
devananda | what makes a pub key different from a heat template different from an image -- from the perspective of publishing & browsing opaque content? | 20:10 |
*** fnaval has quit IRC | 20:10 | |
markmc | dhellmann, to allow users to browse available templates | 20:10 |
devananda | russellb: don't snapshots have similar security requriements? | 20:11 |
russellb | security compliance rules around storing key material | 20:11 |
mikal | russellb: I am ok with that, as long as there's a good reason | 20:11 |
zaneb | they're a pain to store outside the cloud and still be able to access from Heat | 20:11 |
*** pcrews_ has left #openstack-meeting | 20:11 | |
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:11 | |
markwash | mikal: we don't do fancy crypto so we shouldn't store keys | 20:11 |
markwash | its not that we couldn't | 20:11 |
zaneb | you could just use swift | 20:11 |
russellb | devananda: haven't heard that requirement | 20:11 |
markwash | its just that no one would choose to use glance for keys :-) | 20:11 |
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC | 20:11 | |
markmc | zaneb, but you wouldn't have browsing | 20:11 |
zaneb | but glance provides a lot of nice things (e.g. artifacts are immutable) | 20:11 |
russellb | right, and typing | 20:11 |
dhellmann | is immutability a strong enough feature to be mentioned in the mission, preventing any type of artifact from being mutable without TC approval later? | 20:12 |
russellb | and i guess some additional access controls | 20:12 |
markmc | typing facilitates browsing | 20:12 |
* markmc getting silly now | 20:12 | |
russellb | :) | 20:12 |
jaypipes | dhellmann: I think that's a good question. | 20:12 |
ttx | I think it makes sense to use a more generic name than "images" since we are about to use glance to store more than just disk images | 20:12 |
* markwash is not sure he can follow the pace of all this :-) | 20:12 | |
markmc | immutability is there for browsing experience too? | 20:12 |
zaneb | russellb: yeah, typing is essential for Murano, at least | 20:13 |
jaypipes | dhellmann: is mutability a requirement for being a versioned archetype? I think it is. | 20:13 |
dhellmann | markwash: what I read in draft 3 was a lot of features of glance, but not the *reason* for having those features | 20:13 |
markwash | immutability is just part the expected user experience of a repository | 20:13 |
jaypipes | dhellmann: sorry, meant *immutability* :) | 20:13 |
*** eankutse has quit IRC | 20:13 | |
markwash | think sonatype nexus for an example of another "repository" as I mean it today | 20:13 |
fungi | jaypipes: i think strict versioning at least enables immutability | 20:13 |
ttx | dhellmann: agree reason could be provided in the commit message | 20:13 |
zaneb | I actually don't like the wording w.r.t immutability | 20:13 |
jaypipes | fungi: agreed. | 20:13 |
*** jecarey has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:14 | |
jaypipes | and frankly, the prospect of having a service that provides these schemas/archetypes in a consistent, versioned manner is really appealing to me. | 20:14 |
dhellmann | ttx: no, I mean the mission is supposed to describe what is being built in terms of what benefit it brings, not in terms of a product manager's view of features | 20:14 |
zaneb | the repository should be versioned and you should only be able to reference fixed versions | 20:14 |
devananda | markwash: if glance may be configured as a broker that does not store objects locally, how does it guarantee immutability? | 20:14 |
zaneb | not 100% sure that 'immutable' is the right way to describe that | 20:14 |
fungi | "what problems this solves in an openstack environment"? | 20:14 |
*** jecarey_ has quit IRC | 20:14 | |
dhellmann | zaneb: those are product requirements, not a program mission description | 20:14 |
jaypipes | I envision things like images, block device mappings, even things like capabilities that are currently randomly plopped into nova's compute node and flavor extra_specs stuff, | 20:14 |
markwash | devananda: we strive to own the account things are stored under elsewhere | 20:14 |
dhellmann | "a service to store and find application-specific BLOBs" is a mission | 20:15 |
*** crobertsrh has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:15 | |
*** crobertsrh has left #openstack-meeting | 20:15 | |
mordred | dhellmann: ++ | 20:15 |
*** crobertsrh has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:15 | |
ttx | dhellmann: glance first consumer are other openstack services though, and I think taht's covered in "artifacts consumable by OpenStack services in a unified manner" wording | 20:15 |
*** denis_makogon has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:15 | |
zaneb | dhellmann: swift does that. glance is something more specific | 20:15 |
dhellmann | ttx: ok, I was being brief for irc | 20:15 |
dhellmann | zaneb: does swift have search? | 20:15 |
devananda | zaneb: that's my confusion | 20:15 |
*** fnaval has quit IRC | 20:16 | |
dhellmann | zaneb: are swift objects application-specific? maybe "strongly typed" instead? | 20:16 |
mordred | it's an artifact registry | 20:16 |
mikal | dhellmann: it has search for prefix in a container | 20:16 |
markmc | wow, BLOB is actually an acronym | 20:16 |
mordred | that you can stick something in swift is irrelvant | 20:16 |
mordred | markmc: yup. Binary Large OBject | 20:16 |
dhellmann | markmc: yeah | 20:16 |
mordred | you can also just have LOB | 20:16 |
*** olaph has left #openstack-meeting | 20:16 | |
fungi | markmc: if it's in the jargon file, it's *got* to be true | 20:16 |
fungi | gospel | 20:16 |
markwash | keeping in mind that we actualy use swift for storage in many deployments. . we're focusing on the value add over-top of swift | 20:16 |
mordred | markwash: ++ | 20:16 |
markmc | fungi, wikipedia too | 20:16 |
markwash | which includes rich type-specific metadata | 20:16 |
dhellmann | markwash: +1 | 20:17 |
markmc | metadata is a feature, why is it useful? browsing? | 20:17 |
gokrokve | References is one of the key features of the artifact repository | 20:17 |
zaneb | dhellmann: I think you'll end up with a different product if your mission doesn't include the fact that artifacts are versioned | 20:17 |
dhellmann | markwash: is that what "documents" means in the current draft? I wasn't sure what the distinction between documents and BLOB was | 20:17 |
ttx | OK, looks like we'll have to timebox this | 20:17 |
markwash | dhellmann: yes | 20:17 |
jaypipes | markmc: technically, when Jim Starkey invented the term back in the 70s, Blob was not an acronym.. he just meant to reference a thing without structure. | 20:17 |
devananda | a service which brokers access to application-specific data objects which, once stored, are versioned. | 20:17 |
markwash | metadata is such a terrible word | 20:17 |
dhellmann | markwash: ok, thanks for clarifying | 20:17 |
gokrokve | It should be able to download a bulk of artifacts tied by references | 20:17 |
markwash | the goal is to take as much semantic user metadata and make it actually schematic document data | 20:17 |
* jaypipes goes back into pedantry cave. | 20:18 | |
mordred | jaypipes: new rule, anyone who mentions starkey loses ;) | 20:18 |
jaypipes | mordred: :) | 20:18 |
markwash | since user-metadata is not very discoverable, understandable, portable, etc | 20:18 |
devananda | mordred: lol | 20:18 |
annegentle | jaypipes: pedant! | 20:18 |
ttx | Let's try to iterate on the review itself. If it stalls we can raise a ML thread | 20:18 |
sdague | ok, so here's where I like doing mission statements in folksy language. :) | 20:18 |
ttx | BUT | 20:18 |
*** vkmc has quit IRC | 20:18 | |
markmc | "document" doesn't resonate with me as data which is attributes describing the BLOB | 20:18 |
markwash | markmc: fair | 20:18 |
ttx | I kinda like that we are expanding Glance role to cover not just disk images but other BLOBs of the same type of usage | 20:18 |
dhellmann | markmc: +1 | 20:19 |
ttx | One potential issue we need to check is the change in the "official name" from "OpenStack Image Service" to "OpenStack Artifact Repository" | 20:19 |
markwash | actually I struggled to get that term, I don't know what the right one is, just metadata is so so overloaded :-) | 20:19 |
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:19 | |
ttx | Personally I think the new name makes way more sense, but I feel like we need to warn more than just the developers about it | 20:19 |
ttx | (once we converge onto a new mission/name) | 20:19 |
jaypipes | markwash: schema? archetype? | 20:19 |
markmc | yeah, I think there's consensus here on the general idea | 20:19 |
markmc | just nitpicking now, really | 20:19 |
russellb | yeah, definitely like the general idea | 20:19 |
mordred | ++ | 20:19 |
russellb | wording is hard | 20:19 |
markmc | collaborative editing | 20:19 |
mordred | general idea rocks | 20:19 |
mordred | words suck | 20:19 |
zaneb | markwash: I'm also curious about the Graffiti blueprint, and how that ties in with this mission | 20:19 |
ttx | OK, and gerrit helps with that | 20:19 |
ttx | Lets' move on to next topi, shall we | 20:19 |
ttx | +c | 20:20 |
mordred | zaneb: I think that's to expand on the metadata side of the coin | 20:20 |
markwash | so, my feeling on Graffiti is that it helps us with the user-metadata we will keep | 20:20 |
russellb | how many sides does the coin have | 20:20 |
markwash | and the fact that it helps other openstack projects too is just gravy | 20:20 |
*** Michalik_ has quit IRC | 20:20 | |
mordred | russellb: 1000000000000000 | 20:20 |
dhellmann | russellb: that depends on the coin's type, right? | 20:20 |
mordred | dhellmann: I need some coin metadata | 20:20 |
russellb | :) | 20:20 |
dhellmann | mordred: ask markwash | 20:20 |
russellb | ok, i think we can move to the next topic | 20:20 |
markmc | ok, moving on from glance ... | 20:20 |
devananda | ttx: ++ | 20:20 |
markmc | to more glance? | 20:20 |
ttx | #agreed let's iterate on wording on the gerrit review | 20:20 |
zaneb | markwash: ok, I just want to make sure the Glance team has freedom of action in that area without coming back to the TC | 20:21 |
markwash | zaneb: good point | 20:21 |
ttx | #topic Glance Functional API and Cross-project API Consistency | 20:21 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Glance Functional API and Cross-project API Consistency (Meeting topic: tc)" | 20:21 | |
ttx | #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-May/036416.html | 20:21 |
markwash | lets be sure of that in the notes on the vote if we can | 20:21 |
ttx | So this is more of an advice question, touching API convergence | 20:21 |
markwash | oh yeah this one | 20:21 |
markwash | mostly some folks elected you guys to appoint an api consistency committee | 20:21 |
* ttx with type passed in payload, or actions/action | 20:21 | |
markwash | did you do that? | 20:21 |
markwash | should we talk to them? | 20:21 |
russellb | i like the way you propose better than nova's way | 20:22 |
ttx | err | 20:22 |
markmc | #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-June/thread.html#36701 | 20:22 |
ttx | /action with type passed in payload, or /actions/action | 20:22 |
markmc | damn threads crossing month boundaries | 20:22 |
dhellmann | yeah, I forget who mentioned logging but between that and making request routing easier I like the action in the url, too | 20:22 |
sdague | russellb: agreed, the proposed glance way for actions is much nice | 20:22 |
sdague | nicer | 20:22 |
russellb | anyone disagree? | 20:22 |
sdague | dhellmann: that was me :) | 20:23 |
markmc | I just wish we were gradually converging on API consistency | 20:23 |
ttx | so I don't think we should block them from implementing it at all :) | 20:23 |
dhellmann | sdague: that was a good point | 20:23 |
markmc | that consensus meant all projects would adopt this pattern in future | 20:23 |
markmc | rather than another project to iterate further on this | 20:23 |
annegentle | ttx: I'm in agreement, I'd like to see one project do the work and others follow and it doesn't always have to be nova as pattern-setter | 20:23 |
russellb | markmc: yes, agreed... how can we communicate this widely? | 20:23 |
sdague | dhellmann: I stare at logs a lot... the action urls are painful today | 20:23 |
markmc | russellb, dunno | 20:23 |
russellb | should it be something we document as a best practice recommended by this group? | 20:23 |
russellb | and then blog about it in our new TC update series? :) | 20:24 |
dhellmann | should we start an API style guide in the wiki? or an all-projects spec repo? | 20:24 |
anteaya | cyeoh had a summit session on apis | 20:24 |
* markmc had a document called "ReST standards" before; geddit? | 20:24 | |
markwash | there were volunteers for this in a summit session | 20:24 |
markwash | you could just delegate | 20:24 |
ttx | russellb: at one point in history we wanted to have some API czar, but that died quickly | 20:24 |
markmc | (for another project) | 20:24 |
anteaya | jaypipes you said you would do a thing out of that session | 20:24 |
sdague | right, didn't we discuss an all-projects spec repo | 20:24 |
sdague | and even ttx agreed on it :) | 20:24 |
russellb | this is all i know of ... https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/APIChangeGuidelines | 20:24 |
dhellmann | markwash: by "we" I meant "openstack" rather than "the tc" | 20:24 |
*** afazekas has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:24 | |
russellb | and it's not really about API design at all | 20:24 |
markwash | dhellmann: ah kk | 20:24 |
markmc | we've had some etherpads from design summit sessions too | 20:25 |
russellb | ttx: a nice idea if the right person stepped up and was motivated | 20:25 |
markmc | but they were proposals I guess | 20:25 |
devananda | dhellmann: api style guide could be helpful, but shouldn't be too rigid or may get abused/ignored, depending on how things go | 20:25 |
* markmc put links in https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/juno-cross-project-consistency-across-rest-apis | 20:25 | |
dhellmann | devananda: sure | 20:25 |
ttx | OK, so agreement on letting Glance go in that direction, and wish we had clearer guidelines set to encourage future convergence ? | 20:26 |
sdague | ttx: +1 | 20:26 |
anteaya | I can cobble together the cyeoh's session notes and do a ml post so it gets a tc agenda item | 20:26 |
markmcclain | +1 | 20:26 |
fungi | sounds reasonable | 20:26 |
devananda | +1 | 20:26 |
markmc | we would fully support anyone wanting to take on the task of document style guidelines | 20:26 |
ttx | #agreed Glance can definitely go in that direction for API | 20:26 |
dhellmann | markwash: how about if you *start* a style guide? | 20:26 |
dhellmann | markwash: see what I did there? | 20:26 |
markwash | if I start it, it will never be finished | 20:26 |
markwash | or started | 20:26 |
dhellmann | haha | 20:26 |
markwash | :-) | 20:26 |
devananda | tossing this out there as possibly helpful for folks | 20:26 |
ttx | #info TC would like to have "good API design" guidelines to encourage convergence, looking for volunteers to document and propose that | 20:26 |
devananda | https://restful-api-design.readthedocs.org/en/latest/methods.html | 20:27 |
annegentle | I can ask Diane Fleming if she's interested in picking up an API style guide but we'd need to define what you want. | 20:27 |
dhellmann | markwash: seriously, you could just start with this one issue | 20:27 |
annegentle | she'd have the most cross-project knowledge from all the API doc work | 20:27 |
markwash | dhellmann: I'll give it some thought but I'm in too dangerous a location to commit to anything right now | 20:27 |
dhellmann | markwash: ok | 20:27 |
* markmc throws http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Cloud_APIs_REST_Style_Guide out there as an example | 20:28 | |
ttx | ok, moving on to next topic ? | 20:28 |
markwash | moar glance! | 20:28 |
annegentle | honestly this looks like something Diane could do, would you like it? | 20:28 |
ttx | #link http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Cloud_APIs_REST_Style_Guide | 20:28 |
ttx | annegentle: if she wants to propose something, i don't think we should prevent her | 20:29 |
annegentle | ttx: got it | 20:29 |
ttx | but she should expect the "convergence guideliens" to be nitpicked over to death | 20:29 |
ttx | so albestos suit recommended | 20:29 |
annegentle | heh | 20:29 |
jaypipes | dang it, I really wish I had the time to respond to that Glance functional API thread :( | 20:29 |
annegentle | flame-proof but cancer-causing. Check | 20:30 |
jaypipes | too many darn emails. | 20:30 |
russellb | or some asbestos-replacement that won't ruin your lungs | 20:30 |
ttx | jaypipes is the closest we have in the TC to an APi integrist | 20:30 |
fungi | he is also flameproof, from what i hear | 20:30 |
markwash | I'm a bit afraid that some rest purism might argue against our approach | 20:30 |
markmc | ttx, integrist needs translation - I only learned it from nijaba in atlanta :) | 20:31 |
*** SlickNik has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:31 | |
ttx | oh. | 20:31 |
ttx | frenchism probably | 20:31 |
markmc | markwash, rest purism? never! | 20:31 |
ttx | ok, moving on | 20:31 |
ttx | #topic Integrated projects and new requirements: Gap analysis for Glance | 20:31 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Integrated projects and new requirements: Gap analysis for Glance (Meeting topic: tc)" | 20:31 | |
ttx | mOAR Glance | 20:32 |
ttx | markwash: hi! | 20:32 |
* markwash just made it in time | 20:32 | |
ttx | #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/glance-integration-gaps | 20:32 |
* russellb glances over the etherpad | 20:32 | |
markwash | the formatting there is probably not so good | 20:32 |
ttx | I figured we should expedite this one, since we have markwash around | 20:32 |
markwash | bottom line is that I couldn't really find much of a problem, except pace of bug triage and docs maybe | 20:32 |
*** arunkant has quit IRC | 20:33 | |
*** shadower has quit IRC | 20:33 | |
*** kmartin has quit IRC | 20:33 | |
*** AaronGr has quit IRC | 20:33 | |
*** nijaba has quit IRC | 20:33 | |
*** pfalleno1 has quit IRC | 20:33 | |
*** enikanorov_ has quit IRC | 20:33 | |
*** jrist has quit IRC | 20:33 | |
*** esmute has quit IRC | 20:33 | |
*** jwang_ has quit IRC | 20:33 | |
*** ogelbukh has quit IRC | 20:33 | |
*** ryanpetrello has quit IRC | 20:33 | |
*** cschwede_ has quit IRC | 20:33 | |
*** scottda has quit IRC | 20:33 | |
russellb | i have no complaints | 20:33 |
russellb | nice work :) | 20:33 |
sdague | markwash: so I know for a fact the tempest tests for glance don't actually try to store real binary data, because I got bit by it :) | 20:33 |
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:33 | |
*** esmute has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:33 | |
*** pfallenop has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:33 | |
*** shadower has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:33 | |
*** jwang_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:33 | |
vishy | its ok REST fails when using lists + acls | 20:33 |
*** shadower has quit IRC | 20:33 | |
*** shadower has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:33 | |
*** scottda has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:33 | |
*** jrist has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:33 | |
*** kmartin has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:33 | |
ttx | markwash: you might want to refine your https://launchpad.net/~glance-coresec/+members -- looks like an old list of glance-core people | 20:33 |
*** kmartin has quit IRC | 20:33 | |
*** kmartin has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:33 | |
markwash | sdague: eek | 20:33 |
*** arunkant has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:33 | |
*** ryanpetrello has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:33 | |
*** AaronGr has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:33 | |
sdague | And I'm pretty sure much of the v2 api is not covered | 20:33 |
markwash | glance core has been a bit of an alumni association, yes | 20:33 |
russellb | would be nice to get nova updated to using latest glance API | 20:34 |
russellb | could use help there | 20:34 |
sdague | markwash: yeh, mtreinish wrote all the glance tests a year ago when they largely didn't exist | 20:34 |
*** nijaba has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:34 | |
*** nijaba has quit IRC | 20:34 | |
*** nijaba has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:34 | |
sdague | but there are definitely holes | 20:34 |
*** ogelbukh has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:34 | |
annegentle | markwash: my input on docs would be that API docs also include the reference listings at http://developer.openstack.org/api-ref-image-v2.html and http://developer.openstack.org/api-ref-image-v1.html | 20:34 |
ttx | mordred: could you add markwash as admin to https://launchpad.net/~glance-coresec/+members ? | 20:34 |
markwash | ttx: OH! core-sec | 20:35 |
ttx | mordred: and maybe remove yourself (you retain access through openstack-admins) | 20:35 |
*** cschwede has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:35 | |
fungi | or i can take care of it if mordred is busy mordreding | 20:36 |
annegentle | markwash: bit of docs analytics trivia | 20:36 |
markwash | annegentle: I personally have had a perilous time trying to keep our docs in mind. its like there's no cubby space for that in my brain somehow | 20:36 |
*** navid has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:36 | |
ttx | fungi: we have to elevate ourselves to admin, while he is admin already. But yes, you can do it :) | 20:36 |
annegentle | markwash: one of the most visited pages on the docs site is http://docs.openstack.org/image-guide/content/ch_converting.html | 20:36 |
annegentle | markwash: sounds like your brain needs a mudroom for docs | 20:36 |
markwash | indeed | 20:37 |
annegentle | markwash: but it's also the most exited page | 20:37 |
*** dhellman_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:37 | |
*** thuc has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:37 | |
*** s3wong_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:37 | |
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:38 | |
mordred | ttx: on it | 20:38 |
sdague | markwash: I haven't looked recently, but I did have concerns about the review patterns in glance core. Where largely nothing would get looked at for 4 - 6 weeks, then mass approvals near a milestone | 20:38 |
ttx | markwash: I don't see any gaps. Only suggestions for improevments (like moar coverage) | 20:38 |
markwash | sdague: yes, honestly we're struggling in that capacity :-( | 20:39 |
sdague | that pattern in glance was actually one of the key reasons we implemented clean check | 20:39 |
jaypipes | russellb: I've been working towards glance v2 api support in nova. | 20:39 |
fungi | ttx: markwash: mordred: updated glance-coresec | 20:39 |
russellb | jaypipes: awesome | 20:39 |
mordred | fungi: oh - you got it. great | 20:39 |
sdague | because lots of glance patches with really old test results would get sent into the queue | 20:39 |
jaypipes | russellb: all the blueprints are marked low priority and retargeted to j-2 | 20:39 |
markwash | I've been very time conflicted and haven't figured out the right way to motivate folks | 20:39 |
*** plomakin_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:39 | |
fungi | ttx: markwash: mordred: admins are now brian waldon and mark washenberger | 20:39 |
*** Mandell has quit IRC | 20:39 | |
sdague | markwash: so I guess that raises an interesting question. Is the core review team healthy enough to take on more mission? | 20:39 |
ttx | markwash: so now you can clean up https://launchpad.net/~glance-coresec/+members, ideally so that it's only 2-4 active core | 20:40 |
ttx | (interested in security issues) | 20:40 |
markwash | probably want to remove bcwaldon fungi | 20:40 |
fungi | markwash: will do | 20:40 |
markmcclain | sdague: was wondering the same thing | 20:40 |
*** eglynn-afk is now known as eglynn | 20:40 | |
fungi | markwash: done | 20:40 |
mikal | jaypipes: they will have been retargetted because we're so close to j-1 now | 20:40 |
jaypipes | sdague: I believe the core review team would expand given the new mission...or at least, the opportunity to add some new folks would exist. | 20:40 |
markwash | sdague: actually i think the extra interest from murano and graffiti folks is something we could catalyze into better review practices | 20:40 |
jaypipes | mikal: oh, I know. wasn't complaining. just as an FYI | 20:40 |
markwash | b/c the problem is that glance's old mission is kind of stale and uninteresting | 20:40 |
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:40 | |
markwash | so it doesn't really draw people into the project as much | 20:41 |
ttx | #info recommendation: more coverage (API v2, binary content...) | 20:41 |
ttx | #info recommendation: saner review pattern | 20:41 |
markwash | murano, graffiti, solumn, heat, etc. | 20:41 |
markwash | s/solumn/solum/ of course | 20:41 |
devananda | markwash: being stable isn't a bad thing ... :) | 20:41 |
*** dhellmann_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:41 | |
sdague | markwash: ok. I think it's something we should checkpoint on though. Because I do get concerned with integrated projects that only review in bursts | 20:41 |
markwash | sdague: +1 | 20:41 |
sdague | devananda: um... you should have seen some of those patches. :) | 20:42 |
*** rromans_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:42 | |
markwash | checkpointing is great b/c honestly we need help and you guys can point us in the right direction | 20:42 |
ttx | sdague: I expect the new mission will inject new blood, fwiw | 20:42 |
*** zns has quit IRC | 20:42 | |
sdague | ttx: yep, that's fair. I just want to raise it as a concern. | 20:42 |
*** belmoreira has quit IRC | 20:42 | |
ttx | concern noted | 20:42 |
sdague | so we can be mindful of it | 20:42 |
ttx | anything else ? | 20:42 |
ttx | Do we agree tat there is no gap, only a set of recommendations ? | 20:43 |
dhellman_ | I thought testing was a gap? | 20:43 |
ttx | #info recommendation: fix glance-coresec to only include 2-4 active core members interested in security issues | 20:43 |
*** sarob has quit IRC | 20:43 | |
markwash | is there an api coverage report generated from tempest? | 20:43 |
sdague | markwash: I haven't dug into it deeply | 20:43 |
navid | Hi | 20:44 |
ttx | dhellman_: A gap would mean, we'd reject Glance in integration if it were proposed now. Do you think testing coverage is a gap ? | 20:44 |
ttx | A gap means we want to have a gap coverage plan in place ASAP | 20:44 |
sdague | ttx: the lack of testing a binary image is probably a gap :) | 20:44 |
sdague | but I'll let markwash pound that out in a week, and it should be fine | 20:44 |
ttx | OK | 20:44 |
dhellmann_ | ttx: what sdague said :-) | 20:44 |
navid | since you are discussing tests. is there a solid document about unit tests in keystone | 20:44 |
markwash | ascii is a subset of binary | 20:44 |
markwash | bam | 20:44 |
*** HenryG has quit IRC | 20:45 | |
fungi | heh | 20:45 |
ttx | #info gap: intgeration tests -- lack of testing a binary image | 20:45 |
anteaya | navid: this is a meeting, try #openstack-dev | 20:45 |
sdague | markwash: :) | 20:45 |
ttx | OK, anything else ? | 20:45 |
fungi | i suppose the pedants can say high-bit rather than binary | 20:45 |
*** devlaps1 has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:45 | |
markwash | fungi: you got me | 20:45 |
*** kgriffs|afk is now known as kgriffs | 20:46 | |
ttx | markwash: so you should come up with a plan to address the identified gap, ideally within the Juno cycle | 20:46 |
ttx | should be short :) | 20:46 |
markwash | I'll see if the plan can be a gerrit review | 20:46 |
ttx | You can file the plan in a doc like https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/TechnicalCommittee/Ceilometer_Gap_Coverage | 20:46 |
ttx | just ping me when you have it up | 20:47 |
markwash | kk | 20:47 |
ttx | let's move on | 20:47 |
ttx | #topic Defcore status update | 20:47 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Defcore status update (Meeting topic: tc)" | 20:47 | |
mikal | Oh hai | 20:47 |
markwash | (thanks everybody!) | 20:47 |
ttx | no zehicle today, maybe mikal can expose how last meetings went ? | 20:47 |
ttx | markwash: Thanks for everything | 20:48 |
*** luis_ has quit IRC | 20:48 | |
*** dhellmann_ has quit IRC | 20:48 | |
mikal | So... I'm meant to have drafted by now a request for PTLs and TC to help nominate designated sections for their projects | 20:48 |
mikal | Its started, but stalled | 20:48 |
mikal | I'll pick that up again this week, so expect something soon | 20:48 |
*** dhellmann_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:48 | |
ttx | mikal: and mordred was supposed to file a scoring proposal as a governance change | 20:48 |
mordred | yes. I'm behidn. sorry | 20:48 |
*** VijayB_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:48 | |
*** mrunge has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:48 | |
*** gyee has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:49 | |
ttx | mikal: is tat still needed ? | 20:49 |
mikal | ttx: cool | 20:49 |
ttx | +h? | 20:49 |
mikal | ttx: the designated sections thing? I was only asked to do it last week, so I guess that defcore believes it is still needed | 20:49 |
*** zdiN0bot has quit IRC | 20:49 | |
ttx | (I think it is, just checking) | 20:49 |
*** sballe has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:49 | |
mikal | I was going to draft it in the form of a TC resolution requesting PTLs to provide a response for the TC to rubber stamp / route | 20:49 |
*** VijayB_ has quit IRC | 20:49 | |
mikal | Based on the principles we agreed to a while ago | 20:50 |
*** vermarah has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:50 | |
*** vermarah__ has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:50 | |
*** vermarah_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:50 | |
ttx | mikal: do you think we need a resolution for that ? | 20:50 |
*** hs634 has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:50 | |
mikal | ttx: probably not, but it seemed the easiest way to get something into the repo | 20:50 |
mikal | ttx: just a really light weight "please consider these principles and then send a gerrit review adding a section for your project below" | 20:51 |
mikal | ttx: if you have a different process, I'm all ears | 20:51 |
*** gyee has quit IRC | 20:51 | |
ttx | mikal: was thinking an email with cc:openstack-tc should be sufficient, but i'm fine with the resolution route | 20:51 |
*** thuc has quit IRC | 20:51 | |
*** klindgren_ has left #openstack-meeting | 20:51 | |
ttx | it will just take more time | 20:51 |
*** vkmc has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:51 | |
mikal | Yeah, I liked that just because it ties everything together with a documented history | 20:52 |
ttx | mikal: your call, really. | 20:52 |
ttx | mikal: anything else ? | 20:52 |
*** thuc has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:52 | |
mikal | Well, let me finish writing it first and then people can comment on the process | 20:52 |
*** VijayB has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:52 | |
ttx | Questions on defcore ? | 20:53 |
ttx | #topic Governance changes in review | 20:53 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Governance changes in review (Meeting topic: tc)" | 20:53 | |
*** gyee has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:53 | |
ttx | * Propose Designate for Incubation (https://review.openstack.org/97609) | 20:53 |
Kiall | Heya | 20:53 |
*** rodrigods_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:54 | |
*** lsmola__ has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:54 | |
*** devlaps has quit IRC | 20:54 | |
*** malini1 has quit IRC | 20:54 | |
*** nedbat has quit IRC | 20:54 | |
*** bknudson has quit IRC | 20:54 | |
*** amcrn has quit IRC | 20:54 | |
*** manishg has quit IRC | 20:54 | |
*** blogan has quit IRC | 20:54 | |
*** s3wong has quit IRC | 20:54 | |
*** hemna has quit IRC | 20:54 | |
*** Guest26452 has quit IRC | 20:54 | |
*** dhellmann has quit IRC | 20:54 | |
*** hrybacki_ has quit IRC | 20:54 | |
*** Youcef_ has quit IRC | 20:54 | |
*** bogdando has quit IRC | 20:54 | |
*** masayukig has quit IRC | 20:54 | |
*** rromans has quit IRC | 20:54 | |
*** rodrigods has quit IRC | 20:54 | |
*** DuncanT- has quit IRC | 20:54 | |
*** elo1 has quit IRC | 20:54 | |
*** coolsvap|afk has quit IRC | 20:54 | |
*** plomakin has quit IRC | 20:54 | |
*** lsmola_ has quit IRC | 20:54 | |
*** hugokuo has quit IRC | 20:54 | |
*** dhellmann_ is now known as dhellmann | 20:54 | |
ttx | -1s from mikal and markmc still standing | 20:54 |
* mikal looks again | 20:54 | |
russellb | appears to be general support, just for some requests to add/change wording | 20:54 |
Kiall | markmc just proposed we reword one of the sections, we're happy to. mugsie was preparing an alternative | 20:54 |
*** VijayB has quit IRC | 20:54 | |
mikal | Oh yeah | 20:54 |
markmc | cool | 20:54 |
Kiall | and I believe we have addressed mikal's concers | 20:55 |
*** hemna has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:55 | |
mugsie | yeah - what we have now is "Enable operators to provide scalable, on demand self service access for customers to authoritative DNS services." | 20:55 |
mikal | I just wanted the nova proxy work | 20:55 |
mikal | Kiall: I don't see a new patchset? | 20:55 |
markmcclain | have we solved the issue of where to house the application? | 20:55 |
Kiall | mikal: Oh - We've included that in the wiki page | 20:55 |
*** julienvey has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:55 | |
Kiall | an action item seems inappropriate for merging into the repo? | 20:55 |
mugsie | mikal: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Designate/Incubation_Application#Why_a_new_project.3F | 20:55 |
*** kaitlin has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:55 | |
mikal | Oh, I see | 20:55 |
ttx | markmcclain: orthogonal discussion ? | 20:55 |
Kiall | markmcclain: no, not that I saw. | 20:56 |
Kiall | ttx: ++ | 20:56 |
*** kaitlin has left #openstack-meeting | 20:56 | |
dhellman_ | markmcclain: do you mean which program? | 20:56 |
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC | 20:56 | |
Kiall | markmc: does mugsie's alternative wording make sense for you? | 20:56 |
ttx | mordred: asked you a question there: "@Monty: Obviously the application should not live in the projects.yaml. Would you have the application details in the commit message ? Or in some new file under the "resolutions" directory ? Or in a file in a new "applications" directory ?" | 20:56 |
*** dhellmann has quit IRC | 20:56 | |
*** bogdando has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:56 | |
*** dhellman_ is now known as dhellmann | 20:56 | |
markmc | Kiall, sounds a lot better, yes | 20:56 |
*** thuc has quit IRC | 20:56 | |
ttx | OK, let's iterate one more time and get it approved soon | 20:57 |
markmc | but then again ... "scalable, on deman" ... true of all OpenStack | 20:57 |
*** s3wong_ is now known as s3wong | 20:57 | |
Kiall | markmc: Okay, we're happy to make that change - but don't want to change the document mid voting without telling people ;) | 20:57 |
ttx | * Adds a resolution addressing expected election behaviour (https://review.openstack.org/98675) | 20:57 |
anteaya | o/ | 20:57 |
*** yingjun has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:57 | |
markmcclain | ttx: yes orthogonal but in the comments of this review | 20:57 |
ttx | Not as much time to discuss that as I'd like to | 20:57 |
ttx | Let's comment on te Gerrit review | 20:57 |
anteaya | comments so far range from none of the tc can be included in the process to all of the tc must be included | 20:57 |
mikal | anteaya: yeah, do both of those | 20:58 |
anteaya | so patchset 2 will be a challenge for me | 20:58 |
anteaya | you got it | 20:58 |
anteaya | additional comments welcome | 20:58 |
mugsie | anteaya: if you have any questions about what I meant in my comments, ping me | 20:58 |
eglynn | anteaya: ... well to be fair, it was more that it must be spelled out which it is | 20:58 |
ttx | yeah, I think everyone agrees with the general intent, but the escalation process in case of violation may still need a bit of refinement | 20:58 |
*** nedbat has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:58 | |
anteaya | which needs to take into account our voting process | 20:58 |
anteaya | the timing around it and how it currently works | 20:59 |
eglynn | ... and who does the investigating | 20:59 |
*** enikanorov_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:59 | |
eglynn | ... and the finding of guilt, and deciding the penalty | 20:59 |
anteaya | who has time to do the investigating | 20:59 |
*** ArxCruz has quit IRC | 20:59 | |
anteaya | not guilt, violation | 21:00 |
ttx | OK, let's continue on the review. I know a lot of people haven't reviewed it yet ( includeing me) | 21:00 |
anteaya | different words | 21:00 |
ttx | * Add translation support requirement (https://review.openstack.org/97872) | 21:00 |
*** baoli has quit IRC | 21:00 | |
ttx | same here, needs a bit more reviews | 21:00 |
ttx | #topic Housekeeping items | 21:00 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Housekeeping items (Meeting topic: tc)" | 21:00 | |
ttx | * Sync infra projects list (https://review.openstack.org/98239) | 21:00 |
ttx | That one I shall approve after meeting, unless someone complains NOW | 21:00 |
ttx | #topic Open discussion | 21:01 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Open discussion (Meeting topic: tc)" | 21:01 | |
ttx | Famous last words, anyone ? | 21:01 |
russellb | we talked about blogging our activities, i'll take a stab at covering this week | 21:01 |
anteaya | yay | 21:01 |
*** rbowen has quit IRC | 21:01 | |
dhellmann | thanks, russellb! | 21:01 |
mikal | russellb: thanks | 21:01 |
ttx | russellb: still working out the details of the o.o/blog accounts | 21:01 |
jaypipes | russellb: ty | 21:01 |
russellb | ttx: will just post to mine for now | 21:02 |
zaneb | russellb: ++ | 21:02 |
russellb | tomorrow morning | 21:02 |
ttx | russellb: ok | 21:02 |
ttx | Maybe we should just post to personal blogs nd keep some common title | 21:02 |
*** richm has left #openstack-meeting | 21:02 | |
ttx | #endmeeting | 21:02 |
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings" | 21:02 | |
openstack | Meeting ended Tue Jun 10 21:02:57 2014 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 21:02 |
openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tc/2014/tc.2014-06-10-20.03.html | 21:03 |
openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tc/2014/tc.2014-06-10-20.03.txt | 21:03 |
openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tc/2014/tc.2014-06-10-20.03.log.html | 21:03 |
*** pdmars_ has quit IRC | 21:03 | |
markmcclain | if it ends up on planet than we're good | 21:03 |
ttx | dhellmann, dolphm, notmyname, eglynn, markwash, jgriffith, mikal, zaneb, david-lyle, kmestery, SlickNik, SergeyLukjanov: around ? | 21:03 |
devananda | dhellmann: on 97872, this seems to settle the discussion of "should we translate log messages". Is that the intent? | 21:03 |
SergeyLukjanov | o/ | 21:03 |
mestery | o/ | 21:03 |
markwash | o/ | 21:03 |
dolphm | o/ | 21:03 |
SlickNik | o/ | 21:03 |
dhellmann | o/ | 21:03 |
mikal | Hi! | 21:03 |
zaneb | here, but might have to disappear in ~ half an hour | 21:03 |
* fungi standing in for jeblair | 21:03 | |
jgriffith | o/ | 21:03 |
notmyname | here | 21:03 |
* mrunge for david-lyle | 21:03 | |
*** vinod has left #openstack-meeting | 21:03 | |
ttx | zaneb: hopefully we'll be done by then :) | 21:03 |
ttx | #startmeeting project | 21:03 |
openstack | Meeting started Tue Jun 10 21:03:56 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is ttx. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 21:03 |
openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 21:03 |
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: project)" | 21:03 | |
openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'project' | 21:04 |
ttx | Agenda for today is available at: | 21:04 |
ttx | #link http://wiki.openstack.org/Meetings/ProjectMeeting | 21:04 |
eglynn | o/ | 21:04 |
ttx | #topic News from the 1:1 sync points | 21:04 |
*** openstack changes topic to "News from the 1:1 sync points (Meeting topic: project)" | 21:04 | |
ttx | #link http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ptl_sync/2014/ptl_sync.2014-06-10-08.41.html | 21:04 |
ttx | #topic Other program news | 21:05 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Other program news (Meeting topic: project)" | 21:05 | |
ttx | Infra, QA, Docs... anything you'd like to mention ? | 21:05 |
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:05 | |
ttx | mtreinish, fungi ? | 21:05 |
*** tsimmons has left #openstack-meeting | 21:05 | |
ttx | annegentle (if still around) ? | 21:05 |
fungi | ttx: nothing new from infra. be kind, test your patches ;) | 21:05 |
*** manishg has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:05 | |
ttx | fungi: the gate fire seems to be mostly under control now ? | 21:05 |
fungi | the gate's not nearly as far behind as last week | 21:06 |
fungi | right | 21:06 |
*** yingjun has quit IRC | 21:06 | |
mtreinish | ttx: nothing from me today, was heads down trying to debug the gate last week | 21:06 |
fungi | looking at ~3-4 hour delays in approval to merge at the moment | 21:06 |
ttx | Still a lot to process for juno-1 | 21:06 |
ttx | which brings us to the next topic | 21:06 |
*** mwagner_lap has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:06 | |
*** hashar has quit IRC | 21:06 | |
dhellmann | 3-4 hours is pretty good for a weekday | 21:06 |
ttx | #topic Juno-1 tagging | 21:06 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Juno-1 tagging (Meeting topic: project)" | 21:06 | |
ttx | #info juno-1 needs to be tagged between now and Thursday | 21:06 |
eglynn | are we going to explicit wait for gate drainage? | 21:07 |
ttx | By the end of the day the j-1 plans should reflect what is already approved and in-flight | 21:07 |
eglynn | *explicitly | 21:07 |
ttx | eglynn: hmm, not sure I understand your question | 21:07 |
ttx | We should generally shoot for tagging tomorrow, rather than stretch it to Thursday | 21:07 |
eglynn | ttx: ... I mean, wait for the verification queue of approved patches to drain | 21:07 |
mikal | ttx: I was intending to produce a git sha interactively with you tonight my time, tomorrow morning your time. Is that ok with you? | 21:08 |
eglynn | ttx: ... or just go with whatever has landed by EoD tmrw | 21:08 |
*** manishg is now known as 92AABDT0N | 21:08 | |
ttx | eglynn: ideally we should tag when what was approved today gets merged | 21:08 |
eglynn | just mainly wondering about gate-lag | 21:08 |
*** marcoemorais has quit IRC | 21:09 | |
eglynn | ttx: k, that sounds reasonable | 21:09 |
ttx | but we can also have exceptions, if like a blueprint completion is a few hours away in the queue | 21:09 |
*** marcoemorais has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:09 | |
*** aburaschi has quit IRC | 21:09 | |
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:09 | |
ttx | so when you have everything you want in juno-1, just let me know a SHA I can use for the juno-1 tag | 21:09 |
ttx | and i'll make it happen | 21:09 |
ttx | It's fine if stuff is deferred, juno-1 is just a point in time | 21:10 |
ttx | it should reflect what we amnaged to squeeze in by that date | 21:10 |
*** rockyg has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:10 | |
ttx | Questions on juno-1 ? | 21:10 |
SergeyLukjanov | ttx, will we have proposed branches this time? | 21:10 |
ttx | mikal: I have to run an errand tomorrow morning | 21:11 |
*** malini1 has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:11 | |
*** bknudson has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:11 | |
*** amcrn has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:11 | |
*** manishg has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:11 | |
*** blogan has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:11 | |
*** Guest26452 has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:11 | |
*** hrybacki_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:11 | |
*** Youcef_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:11 | |
*** masayukig has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:11 | |
*** DuncanT- has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:11 | |
*** coolsvap|afk has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:11 | |
*** hugokuo has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:11 | |
*** dickson.freenode.net changes topic to "Governance changes in review (Meeting topic: tc)" | 21:11 | |
ttx | SergeyLukjanov: no | 21:11 |
mikal | ttx: ok, I can just send you an email then | 21:11 |
SergeyLukjanov | ttx, ok | 21:11 |
ttx | SergeyLukjanov: we tag directly on master, new process | 21:11 |
*** malini1 has quit IRC | 21:11 | |
*** Mandell has quit IRC | 21:11 | |
*** VijayB has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:11 | |
ttx | mikal: you can also say "tag when change N merges" | 21:12 |
mikal | ttx: ok | 21:12 |
fungi | ttx: give me or someone in infra a heads up before you push the first tag on master just so we can be on top of triage if it goes bad | 21:12 |
ttx | as long as you tell me what to do if it gets booted out of the gate queue (block or release) | 21:12 |
fungi | though in reality i can't think of reasons it should | 21:12 |
ttx | fungi: ok, will wait until you're up | 21:12 |
*** tnurlygayanov_ has quit IRC | 21:12 | |
*** sweston has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:12 | |
*** yuan has quit IRC | 21:13 | |
ttx | I have a tag for Glance already | 21:13 |
ttx | err, a SHA for glance | 21:13 |
*** manishg has quit IRC | 21:13 | |
markwash | go glance! | 21:13 |
ttx | fungi: we could try to push the tag for it just after meeting ? | 21:13 |
*** yuan has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:13 | |
* markwash contributes | 21:13 | |
fungi | ttx: sure | 21:14 |
ttx | Other questions ? | 21:14 |
*** mugsie has left #openstack-meeting | 21:14 | |
ttx | #topic Enable Autokick BP adjustment script | 21:14 |
* dolphm is envious of real PTLs like markwash | 21:14 | |
*** openstack changes topic to "Enable Autokick BP adjustment script (Meeting topic: project)" | 21:14 | |
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:14 | |
ttx | I finalized a new version of the script that adjusts milestone and series goal in Launchpad | 21:14 |
*** ItSANgo has quit IRC | 21:14 | |
*** yogeshmehra has quit IRC | 21:14 | |
ttx | For projects using -specs it will also automatically clear the "milestone target" field if it's set on an unprioritized blueprint | 21:14 |
ttx | The goal being to use the milestone target as a blessed list | 21:14 |
ttx | rather than duplicate the entry point for people wanting to submit features (spec in Gerrit + BP in Launchpad) | 21:15 |
ttx | I've run it for most projects during the 1:1 sync today, and plan to run it on cron every 2/3 hours starting tomorrow | 21:15 |
ttx | Any final objection ? | 21:15 |
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC | 21:15 | |
ttx | notmyname: I did not enable the script for swift, since you don't have a juno milestone yet | 21:15 |
zaneb | ttx: consider putting "this is an automated message" in the comment it leaves | 21:15 |
mestery | None here, thanks for setting this up ttx! | 21:15 |
*** leeantho has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:16 | |
dolphm | mestery: ++ | 21:16 |
notmyname | ttx: ack | 21:16 |
ttx | zaneb: I just like to get the angry people complaining about it | 21:16 |
*** VijayB has quit IRC | 21:16 | |
fungi | sounds pretty awesome | 21:16 |
*** elo has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:16 | |
ttx | #agreed autokick script to run under cron from now on | 21:16 |
ttx | NB: I promised a script that would facilitate creating a BP to track an accepted spec, still working on it | 21:16 |
ttx | It's delayed due to launchpad not supporting creating BPs from the API, so I have to play tricks around it | 21:16 |
zaneb | ttx: I'm more worried about people who think they have brought your wrath down on themselves ;) | 21:16 |
ttx | Stay tuned -- in the mean time just manually file them, like you always did :) | 21:16 |
eglynn | is the wiki updated to describe the user visible aspects of the new process? | 21:17 |
*** dprince has quit IRC | 21:17 | |
ttx | #action ttx to add "this is an automated message" to the whiteboard warning | 21:17 |
eglynn | ... i.e. that the filing of a BP in LP will now be a drivers/PTL action *after* the corresponding action has landed | 21:17 |
ttx | eglynn: unfortunately, not. It's on my TODO list, hope to do it tomorrow | 21:17 |
eglynn | ttx: cool, thanks! | 21:17 |
eglynn | ... corresponding *spec has landed | 21:18 |
*** jaycaz has quit IRC | 21:18 | |
ttx | #topic Sahara-dashboard to Horizon merge progress | 21:18 |
*** jaycaz has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:18 | |
*** openstack changes topic to "Sahara-dashboard to Horizon merge progress (Meeting topic: project)" | 21:18 | |
ttx | SergeyLukjanov: floor is yours | 21:18 |
*** rodrigods_ has quit IRC | 21:18 | |
SergeyLukjanov | ttx, thanks | 21:18 |
*** nedbat has quit IRC | 21:19 | |
SergeyLukjanov | so, the current progress is near to 0 | 21:19 |
*** edmund1 has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:19 | |
*** nedbat has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:19 | |
SergeyLukjanov | mostly all patches are under review | 21:19 |
SergeyLukjanov | but there is a lack of reviews to make them all landed in juno | 21:19 |
eglynn | SergeyLukjanov: are the patches getting reviewer traction? | 21:19 |
eglynn | k | 21:20 |
SergeyLukjanov | I presume crobertsrh is here, he is doing this work from sahara side | 21:20 |
crobertsrh | Yes, I am here. | 21:20 |
*** edmund has quit IRC | 21:20 | |
ttx | mrunge is here for Horizon | 21:20 |
eglynn | I think david-lyle is on vacation | 21:20 |
SergeyLukjanov | crobertsrh, cool, any details? | 21:20 |
mrunge | yes, correct | 21:20 |
*** markmc has quit IRC | 21:20 | |
crobertsrh | Reviewer traction has increased a bit today, but we haven't seen much action from the cores yet. | 21:20 |
mrunge | it seems like most Horizon cores are quite busy with other stuff | 21:21 |
mrunge | and we have an insane queue of patches to review in horizon | 21:21 |
mrunge | that the sad status | 21:21 |
*** patelna has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:22 | |
mrunge | that's ^ | 21:22 |
SergeyLukjanov | heh, I understand | 21:22 |
*** jprovazn has quit IRC | 21:22 | |
* fungi thinks we all know what that's like | 21:22 | |
SergeyLukjanov | we've agreed on design summit that if we'll not be able to merge sahara-dashboard into horizon in j2 timeframe | 21:23 |
* jgriffith sighhs | 21:23 | |
SergeyLukjanov | than we'll need to rollback to the separate repo for juno release | 21:23 |
*** moha_hunt has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:23 | |
*** nedbat has quit IRC | 21:23 | |
*** nedbat has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:23 | |
*** vivek-ebay has quit IRC | 21:23 | |
SergeyLukjanov | mrunge, do you have any suggestions for improving the review process? | 21:24 |
lcheng | crobertsrh: is it possible to have a recorded demo of sahara to help reviewers visualize how it should look (I'm not sure how easy it is to setup sahara in devstack) | 21:24 |
*** tbarron has quit IRC | 21:24 | |
*** banix has quit IRC | 21:24 | |
SergeyLukjanov | docs for running / testing horizon with sahara were requested initially and AFAIK crobertsrh shared them | 21:24 |
crobertsrh | lcheng: There are a couple of videos on youtube. I will try to find them for you. | 21:24 |
SergeyLukjanov | lcheng, I have a screencast recorded for icehouse release somewhere, I'll find it and share | 21:25 |
lcheng | crobertsrh: awesome, just add the links on the BP | 21:25 |
lcheng | SergeyLukjanov: thanks! | 21:25 |
SergeyLukjanov | ttx, are you ok with rollback plan? | 21:26 |
SergeyLukjanov | mrunge, thanks for +2ing sahara patch ;) | 21:26 |
*** jaypipes has quit IRC | 21:26 | |
crobertsrh | mrunge, that made my day :) | 21:27 |
mrunge | SergeyLukjanov, crobertsrh that's just one +2 | 21:27 |
ttx | I think it's very important to expose the integrated functionality in horizon | 21:27 |
mrunge | and you just dropped off 8k lines of code | 21:27 |
crobertsrh | I'm easy to please | 21:28 |
ttx | it's a major new feature of Juno Horizon | 21:28 |
eglynn | are those 8 KLOCs nicely split up? | 21:28 |
*** malini1 has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:28 | |
*** changbl has quit IRC | 21:28 | |
crobertsrh | 9 or 10 patch sets. Generally 1 new panel per patch | 21:28 |
eglynn | ... or just a few monolithic patches? | 21:28 |
eglynn | k | 21:28 |
ttx | if it's not landed by j-2 then yes, probably better to ship it separately | 21:28 |
fungi | ~1000 loc per patch is still pretty huge | 21:28 |
*** thangp has quit IRC | 21:28 | |
ttx | but we should try our best to have it in by then | 21:28 |
mrunge | I still think, we should be able to merge | 21:28 |
*** changbl has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:29 | |
mrunge | given, that reviewers will do their duties | 21:29 |
*** jaypipes has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:29 | |
SergeyLukjanov | mrunge, ttx, yup, I still think that we'll be able to do it too | 21:29 |
ttx | SergeyLukjanov, mrunge: we should watch progress there from time to time, don't hesitate to raise it again at future meetings | 21:29 |
eglynn | ... so is the train of patches to be gated on a -2'd sentinel patch? | 21:29 |
*** adalbas has quit IRC | 21:29 | |
*** vivek-ebay has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:29 | |
eglynn | ... so that either all or none land by juno-2? | 21:29 |
mrunge | rollback? | 21:29 |
eglynn | (... in the style of the recent swift approach) | 21:30 |
mrunge | there were a bunch of minors until now | 21:30 |
* zaneb disappears | 21:30 | |
mikal | You could try the approach we're planning for the nova ironic driver | 21:30 |
ttx | eglynn: I think the current thinking is to roll them back. They are guarded by a feature switch IIUC | 21:30 |
mikal | Build a chain of patches, with the first one having a -2 | 21:30 |
eglynn | http://openstack.10931.n7.nabble.com/Swift-storage-policies-merge-plan-td41512.html | 21:30 |
SergeyLukjanov | ttx, ack, I'm monitoring the progress | 21:30 |
mikal | Once all the rest of the chain is approved, remove that first -2 | 21:30 |
mikal | They merge as a block | 21:31 |
eglynn | ^^^ that's the swift approach I mentioned | 21:31 |
mikal | Oh nice | 21:31 |
mikal | I thought we'd invented it | 21:31 |
mikal | :P | 21:31 |
fungi | yeah, infra has done that a few times in the past for similar situations as well | 21:31 |
*** rockyg has left #openstack-meeting | 21:31 | |
fungi | i think it's convergent evolution | 21:31 |
*** pdmars has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:31 | |
*** amcrn has quit IRC | 21:31 | |
eglynn | "convergent evolution" ... /me likee :) | 21:32 |
SergeyLukjanov | mrunge, could horizon split affect sahara merge to horizon? | 21:32 |
*** flaper87 is now known as flaper87|afk | 21:32 | |
*** jtomasek has quit IRC | 21:32 | |
*** patelna has quit IRC | 21:32 | |
mrunge | SergeyLukjanov, in theory: no | 21:32 |
notmyname | we're actually going to try to end up with one merge commit to gate. to avoid weeks-to-months in the gate to land the chain | 21:32 |
*** kevinconway has quit IRC | 21:32 | |
*** jtomasek has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:32 | |
eglynn | seems like a neat idea, whoever invented it | 21:32 |
*** vivek-ebay has quit IRC | 21:33 | |
*** vivek-ebay has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:33 | |
fungi | yeah, it's worth noting we've seen gerrit's jgit behave badly on dependent patch series >~4-5 changes. it will just arbitrarily claim it ran into merge conflicts. i think there's an upstream bug reported but not sure of the status | 21:33 |
mrunge | SergeyLukjanov, you're just putting code to openstack_dashboard, not to horizon dir. that shouldn't be affected at all by horizon split | 21:33 |
SergeyLukjanov | mrunge, that's cool | 21:33 |
ttx | ok, anything more on atht topic ? We should revisit it every 2 or 3 meetings to make sure we are all in sync | 21:34 |
ttx | SergeyLukjanov: I'll let you put it back on the agenda regularly ;) | 21:34 |
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:35 | |
ttx | #topic Open discussion | 21:35 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Open discussion (Meeting topic: project)" | 21:35 | |
SergeyLukjanov | ttx, ok, thx | 21:35 |
mrunge | SergeyLukjanov, probably you guys should show up on the Horizon weekly meetings as well | 21:35 |
mestery | So, I wanted to discuss the "ssh timeout" issue here. | 21:35 |
mestery | https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1323658 | 21:35 |
uvirtbot | Launchpad bug 1323658 in nova "SSH EOFError - Public network connectivity check failed" [Undecided,New] | 21:35 |
SergeyLukjanov | mrunge, crobertsrh is attending them AFAIK | 21:35 |
*** zaneb has quit IRC | 21:35 | |
mestery | I put some comments in the bug, but it looks like in the cases I've examined, the guest VM never comes back from a resize/restart. | 21:35 |
mestery | Was hoping to get some nova eyes on that bug. :) | 21:35 |
crobertsrh | Yes, I attend them | 21:35 |
ttx | mikal: ^? | 21:36 |
crobertsrh | I'll try to be more vocal | 21:36 |
mikal | What version of libvirt are we running in the gate now? | 21:36 |
sdague | mikal: just be aware that if you drop a ton of patches all at once into the gate - you do a mini dos attack | 21:36 |
*** pdmars has quit IRC | 21:36 | |
mestery | Myself, armax and salv-orlando spent a lot of time debugging that over the past week and a half to get to this point. :) | 21:36 |
mikal | mestery: I think you might need to start an openstack-dev thread about that if you haven't already | 21:36 |
*** jdob has quit IRC | 21:36 | |
mikal | mestery: I don't have an answer off the top of my head | 21:37 |
mestery | mikal: Will do, I'll start that after the meeting. | 21:37 |
sdague | oh, we should get mriedem in here | 21:37 |
mestery | mikal: OK, thanks! | 21:37 |
mikal | mestery: although we've seen some weird behaviour with snapshots in our ancient version of libvirt | 21:37 |
*** jaypipes has quit IRC | 21:37 | |
sdague | the sneaking suspicion at this point is it's floating ip related | 21:37 |
mikal | mestery: I wonder if this is similar | 21:37 |
mestery | mikal: I was suspecting an older version of libvirt possibly as well. | 21:37 |
*** neelashah has quit IRC | 21:37 | |
sdague | and it times with when ceilometer landed a floating ip polling patch | 21:37 |
sdague | which causes tracebacks in n-api | 21:38 |
mestery | The logs all show neutron has set everyting up. | 21:38 |
mestery | when I added a console dump of the guest when the failurie is hit, there is no console output in the return value. :) | 21:38 |
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:38 | |
ttx | mestery: if we can't blame neutron anymore for all weird issues... | 21:38 |
mestery | ttx: :P | 21:38 |
*** sweston has quit IRC | 21:40 | |
ttx | mestery: we won't get to a solution in the meeting, so yes, raising a ML thread about it should help getting nova eyes on it. This is a major offender so hopefully it should get people attention | 21:40 |
ttx | Anything else, anyone ? | 21:41 |
mestery | ttx: Doing it now in fact. Thanks! | 21:41 |
jgriffith | ttx: your script works wonderfully! | 21:41 |
* ttx quicklooks the gate | 21:41 | |
ttx | jgriffith: as in people blame me instead of you ? | 21:41 |
jgriffith | ttx: now if it can just hit people over the head with a virtual hammer when they retarget something after it's run | 21:41 |
jgriffith | ttx: haha! | 21:41 |
jgriffith | ttx: another advantage I hadn't thought of | 21:42 |
fungi | jgriffith: you need to come at them with a clue-by-four | 21:42 |
jgriffith | fungi: LOL | 21:42 |
notmyname | ttx o/ | 21:42 |
jgriffith | fungi: I should be careful, lest I'm hit with one myself | 21:42 |
*** sarob has quit IRC | 21:43 | |
ttx | eglynn: is hbase-events-feature completed by the merging of https://review.openstack.org/#/c/91408/ ? | 21:43 |
ttx | notmyname: shoot | 21:43 |
eglynn | ttx: yes, it sure is | 21:43 |
ttx | ok will mark it implemented | 21:43 |
notmyname | as we've been using a feature branch in swift, I'd like to propose a summit session on using feature branches as a common thing (as opposed to squashed branches as one patch). something to discuss in paris | 21:44 |
notmyname | err...to rephrase, we've used one feature branch. it has advantages and disadvantages | 21:44 |
*** henrynash has quit IRC | 21:44 | |
ttx | notmyname: ok, hopefully we'll remember that by then :) | 21:44 |
* eglynn wonders why the LP auto-update didn't kick in when the patch landed ... | 21:44 | |
notmyname | ttx: I'll remind you. we'll have one for the erasure code work anyway | 21:44 |
*** elo has quit IRC | 21:45 | |
ttx | eglynn: I don't think we have such a thing | 21:45 |
*** ItSANgo has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:45 | |
*** ItSANgo_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:45 | |
*** elo has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:45 | |
eglynn | ttx: ... a-ha, /me was thinking of LP bugs | 21:46 |
*** vijendar has quit IRC | 21:46 | |
ttx | ok, looks like we don't have anything else to discuss | 21:46 |
ttx | at least for today | 21:46 |
ttx | so... | 21:47 |
ttx | #endmeeting | 21:47 |
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings" | 21:47 | |
openstack | Meeting ended Tue Jun 10 21:47:09 2014 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 21:47 |
openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/project/2014/project.2014-06-10-21.03.html | 21:47 |
openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/project/2014/project.2014-06-10-21.03.txt | 21:47 |
openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/project/2014/project.2014-06-10-21.03.log.html | 21:47 |
eglynn | good night all! | 21:47 |
ttx | Thanks everyone | 21:47 |
mestery | Thanks ttx! | 21:47 |
mikal | :) | 21:47 |
*** jecarey has quit IRC | 21:47 | |
*** eglynn has quit IRC | 21:48 | |
SergeyLukjanov | ttx, thx! | 21:49 |
*** crobertsrh is now known as _crobertsrh | 21:49 | |
*** _crobertsrh has left #openstack-meeting | 21:50 | |
*** ramashri has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:50 | |
*** lcostantino has quit IRC | 21:51 | |
*** elo has quit IRC | 21:51 | |
*** elo1 has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:52 | |
*** dims__ has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:52 | |
*** thuc has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:52 | |
*** elo has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:53 | |
*** hrybacki has quit IRC | 21:53 | |
*** sushils_ has quit IRC | 21:53 | |
*** dims_ has quit IRC | 21:54 | |
*** dhellmann has quit IRC | 21:55 | |
*** ramashri_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:55 | |
*** ramashri has quit IRC | 21:55 | |
*** dhellmann has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:55 | |
*** nedbat has quit IRC | 21:56 | |
*** mrunge has quit IRC | 21:56 | |
*** hrybacki_ has quit IRC | 21:57 | |
*** elo1 has quit IRC | 21:58 | |
*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:59 | |
*** elo1 has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:59 | |
*** bauzas has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:59 | |
*** changbl has quit IRC | 22:00 | |
*** thuc has quit IRC | 22:01 | |
*** elo1 has quit IRC | 22:02 | |
*** vpanizo has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:03 | |
*** nedbat has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:04 | |
*** egallen has quit IRC | 22:05 | |
*** nedbat has quit IRC | 22:05 | |
*** elo1 has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:06 | |
*** marcoemorais has quit IRC | 22:08 | |
*** elo has quit IRC | 22:10 | |
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC | 22:14 | |
*** AlanClark has quit IRC | 22:15 | |
*** thuc has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:17 | |
*** rossk has quit IRC | 22:18 | |
*** thuc_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:19 | |
*** denis_makogon has quit IRC | 22:19 | |
*** kayaliu_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:19 | |
*** jtomasek has quit IRC | 22:20 | |
*** bknudson has quit IRC | 22:22 | |
*** thuc has quit IRC | 22:22 | |
*** VijayB_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:23 | |
*** MaxV has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:23 | |
*** VijayB_ has quit IRC | 22:24 | |
*** betsy has quit IRC | 22:27 | |
*** MaxV has quit IRC | 22:28 | |
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC | 22:29 | |
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:29 | |
*** MaxV has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:29 | |
*** MaxV has quit IRC | 22:29 | |
*** VijayB has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:29 | |
*** VijayB has quit IRC | 22:30 | |
*** moha_hunt has quit IRC | 22:31 | |
*** hemna has quit IRC | 22:31 | |
*** mspreitz has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:32 | |
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:32 | |
*** zns has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:33 | |
*** gduan has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:34 | |
*** garyduan has quit IRC | 22:34 | |
*** ivar-lazzaro1 has quit IRC | 22:36 | |
*** ttrifonov is now known as ttrifonov_zZzz | 22:37 | |
*** hemna has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:38 | |
*** zns_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:38 | |
*** zns has quit IRC | 22:38 | |
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:38 | |
*** vkmc_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:39 | |
*** sarob has quit IRC | 22:42 | |
*** vkmc has quit IRC | 22:43 | |
*** thedodd has quit IRC | 22:43 | |
*** VijayB has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:44 | |
*** bauzas has quit IRC | 22:44 | |
*** thuc has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:45 | |
*** thuc_ has quit IRC | 22:45 | |
*** zns has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:46 | |
*** ArxCruz has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:46 | |
*** Guest26452 has quit IRC | 22:48 | |
*** zns_ has quit IRC | 22:49 | |
*** igordcard has quit IRC | 22:50 | |
*** marekd is now known as marekd|away | 22:59 | |
*** elo has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:59 | |
*** mspreitz has quit IRC | 22:59 | |
*** KurtRao has quit IRC | 23:00 | |
*** KurtRao has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:00 | |
*** fnaval has quit IRC | 23:00 | |
*** elo has quit IRC | 23:01 | |
*** VijayB has quit IRC | 23:01 | |
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:01 | |
*** vivek-ebay has quit IRC | 23:01 | |
*** VijayB has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:01 | |
*** thuc has quit IRC | 23:03 | |
*** thuc has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:03 | |
*** bogdando has quit IRC | 23:04 | |
*** radez is now known as radez_g0n3 | 23:04 | |
*** dane_leblanc has quit IRC | 23:05 | |
*** fnaval has quit IRC | 23:05 | |
*** jaycaz has quit IRC | 23:06 | |
*** VijayB has quit IRC | 23:06 | |
*** jaycaz has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:06 | |
*** dims__ has quit IRC | 23:06 | |
*** bogdando has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:07 | |
*** julienvey has quit IRC | 23:07 | |
*** jaycaz has quit IRC | 23:08 | |
*** zns has quit IRC | 23:08 | |
*** dims__ has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:08 | |
*** dane_leblanc has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:09 | |
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC | 23:10 | |
*** edmund1 has quit IRC | 23:12 | |
*** zns has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:13 | |
*** dstanek is now known as dstanek_zzz | 23:13 | |
*** vivek-ebay has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:15 | |
*** atiwari has quit IRC | 23:16 | |
*** zaneb has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:17 | |
*** zns has quit IRC | 23:18 | |
*** gokrokve has quit IRC | 23:19 | |
*** reed_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:21 | |
*** tvoran has quit IRC | 23:21 | |
*** reed has quit IRC | 23:22 | |
*** emagana has quit IRC | 23:22 | |
*** kayaliu_ has quit IRC | 23:24 | |
*** reed_ has quit IRC | 23:27 | |
*** hrybacki has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:27 | |
*** bdpayne has quit IRC | 23:33 | |
*** bdpayne has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:34 | |
*** Mandell has quit IRC | 23:34 | |
*** kgriffs is now known as kgriffs|afk | 23:35 | |
*** zaneb has quit IRC | 23:37 | |
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:38 | |
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:38 | |
*** jmontemayor has quit IRC | 23:39 | |
*** thuc has quit IRC | 23:39 | |
*** reed_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:39 | |
*** cvbock has quit IRC | 23:39 | |
*** thuc has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:39 | |
*** kun_huang has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:41 | |
*** ArxCruz has quit IRC | 23:41 | |
*** sarob has quit IRC | 23:43 | |
*** vkmc_ has quit IRC | 23:43 | |
*** thuc has quit IRC | 23:43 | |
*** oda-g has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:44 | |
*** jwang_ has quit IRC | 23:46 | |
*** yamahata has quit IRC | 23:46 | |
*** tomoe__ has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:47 | |
*** thuc has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:48 | |
*** lcheng has quit IRC | 23:49 | |
*** tomoe_ has quit IRC | 23:50 | |
*** tomoe__ has quit IRC | 23:51 | |
*** tomoe_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:51 | |
*** jwang_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:52 | |
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:52 | |
*** bogdando has quit IRC | 23:54 | |
*** malini1 has left #openstack-meeting | 23:54 | |
*** vermarah__ has quit IRC | 23:56 | |
*** vermarah has quit IRC | 23:56 | |
*** vermarah_ has quit IRC | 23:56 | |
*** bogdando has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:57 | |
*** kun_huang has quit IRC | 23:57 | |
*** thuc has quit IRC | 23:57 | |
*** vuil has quit IRC | 23:58 | |
*** thuc has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:58 | |
*** jwang_ has quit IRC | 23:58 | |
*** cjellick has quit IRC | 23:59 | |
*** cjellick has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:59 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!