| *** alexismonville has joined #storyboard | 01:24 | |
| *** jamesmcarthur has joined #storyboard | 01:55 | |
| *** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 01:59 | |
| *** alexismonville has quit IRC | 02:08 | |
| *** alexismonville has joined #storyboard | 02:09 | |
| *** alexismonville has quit IRC | 02:38 | |
| *** mrmartin has joined #storyboard | 04:50 | |
| *** mrmartin has quit IRC | 05:31 | |
| *** mrmartin has joined #storyboard | 05:59 | |
| *** mrmartin has quit IRC | 06:31 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 06:48 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has joined #storyboard | 06:48 | |
| *** mrmartin has joined #storyboard | 06:55 | |
| *** fay_ has joined #storyboard | 07:21 | |
| *** jtomasek__ has joined #storyboard | 08:21 | |
| *** alexismonville has joined #storyboard | 10:30 | |
| openstackgerrit | Adam Coldrick proposed openstack-infra/storyboard-webclient: Add a subscribe button to worklists https://review.openstack.org/324550 | 10:32 |
|---|---|---|
| openstackgerrit | Adam Coldrick proposed openstack-infra/storyboard-webclient: Complex priorities UI in stories https://review.openstack.org/312666 | 10:32 |
| Zara | ooh | 10:34 |
| Zara | SotK: you okay for me to merge https://review.openstack.org/#/c/338532/ ? forgot to do it last night, sorry. | 10:51 |
| Zara | linting failed for complex priorities ui patch: 2016-07-13 10:53:01.310860 | src/app/stories/controller/story_detail_controller.js | 11:01 |
| Zara | 2016-07-13 10:53:01.310886 | 88:54 error worklist is already declared in the upper scope no-shadow | 11:01 |
| Zara | 2016-07-13 10:53:01.310911 | 92:31 error item is already declared in the upper scope no-shadow | 11:01 |
| Zara | hm... something odd going on on my test instance... perhaps more details shortly | 11:12 |
| Zara | yeah, found a bug in editing comments patch. trying to narrow down the version. | 11:17 |
| Zara | still going... suspect it's to do with the way currentUser is resolved for stories | 11:20 |
| *** alexismonville has quit IRC | 11:22 | |
| Zara | okay, issue persists in earliest version of the patch, but not on master | 11:29 |
| Zara | reminder that it's the storyboard meeting at 15:00 utc! | 11:34 |
| Zara | also hm, my instance no longer displays a favicon. why is that? | 11:40 |
| *** alexismonville has joined #storyboard | 11:43 | |
| *** alexismonville has quit IRC | 11:48 | |
| Zara | the current theory is that zaro's gerrit patches are blocked by the need for this one, if anyone wants to review: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/340529/ | 11:59 |
| Zara | and the its-storyboard patches are here: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:its-storyboard | 12:01 |
| *** alexismonville has joined #storyboard | 12:03 | |
| *** alexismonville has quit IRC | 12:05 | |
| *** alexismonville has joined #storyboard | 12:05 | |
| openstackgerrit | Adam Coldrick proposed openstack-infra/storyboard-webclient: Add a subscribe button to worklists https://review.openstack.org/324550 | 12:07 |
| openstackgerrit | Adam Coldrick proposed openstack-infra/storyboard-webclient: Complex priorities UI in stories https://review.openstack.org/312666 | 12:07 |
| Zara | ooh, again | 12:07 |
| Zara | I'm glad I have lots of review today; testing is easier than coding to do on no sleep | 12:07 |
| *** alexismonville has quit IRC | 12:10 | |
| Zara | complex priorities ui giving same linting errors | 12:21 |
| * Zara is a gerritbot | 12:22 | |
| SotK | oh yeah, I forgot to fix them | 12:22 |
| Zara | np :) | 12:22 |
| Zara | ah, I think the bug from before may be todo with currentUser in module.js specifically, since I'm getting the same issue in the complex priorities ui patch | 12:29 |
| Zara | and that was changed in both | 12:29 |
| Zara | so my guess would be that currentUser.resolve() isn't doing quite what we expect for logged-out users | 12:30 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack-infra/storyboard: Add example commands for the Tags api https://review.openstack.org/338532 | 12:35 |
| *** mrmartin has quit IRC | 12:46 | |
| *** mrmartin has joined #storyboard | 12:52 | |
| SotK | hm, so Session.isLoggedIn() doesn't seem to actually work | 13:01 |
| Zara | \o/ | 13:01 |
| Zara | going to look at all-boards patch again... | 13:14 |
| Zara | I never find time to code | 13:14 |
| Zara | oh yeah, I remember how I'd made this hard for myself now \o/ | 13:25 |
| *** kashyap has joined #storyboard | 13:26 | |
| kashyap | What markup does StoryBoard stories use? | 13:35 |
| kashyap | A small note: It seems like if you accidentally hit 'escape' while drafting a 'story', all the content is gone :-( | 13:35 |
| SotK | kashyap: StoryBoard uses markdown | 13:38 |
| SotK | also, the same thing happens if you accidentally click outside the story creation modal, its something we intend to fix at some point | 13:40 |
| kashyap | SotK: Noted. That bug sounds fairly egregious, as anyone who forgot to save the content locally while drafting a long description, will end up in an unhappy place :-) | 13:41 |
| openstackgerrit | Zara proposed openstack-infra/storyboard-webclient: Fix project group sidebar-search description https://review.openstack.org/341533 | 13:49 |
| *** kashyap has left #storyboard | 13:51 | |
| pedroalvarez | :) | 13:52 |
| *** alexismonville has joined #storyboard | 14:09 | |
| openstackgerrit | Zara proposed openstack-infra/storyboard-webclient: WIP search for boards and worklists https://review.openstack.org/341562 | 14:16 |
| Zara | storyboard meeting in 40 mins! | 14:22 |
| *** jamesmcarthur has joined #storyboard | 14:28 | |
| Zara | I am missing something for this typeahead... | 14:38 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack-infra/storyboard-webclient: Fix project group sidebar-search description https://review.openstack.org/341533 | 14:42 |
| Zara | I changed the template for typeahead_criteria_item, and added boards and worklists to the list in the search controller. nothing is showing up in the typeahead | 14:43 |
| Zara | also, yay, thanks for merging that highly important patch xD | 14:43 |
| * SotK doesn't remember clearly how it works | 14:44 | |
| Zara | heh. I know the search is working because it works for the index page, but the typeahead... | 14:45 |
| Zara | I think typeahead troubles were the reason I never got round to adding suggested tags for the header search | 14:45 |
| *** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 14:48 | |
| *** jamesmcarthur has joined #storyboard | 14:49 | |
| Zara | oh I think worklists and boards need {text:q} in the resource... | 14:51 |
| Zara | WHATEVER THAT MEANS | 14:51 |
| Zara | but that's what the comments suggest | 14:51 |
| Zara | comments + difference between projects resource and worklists resource | 14:51 |
| Zara | yay that causes errors | 14:54 |
| Zara | oh well, meeting in 6 | 14:55 |
| Zara | I haven't updated the agenda yet | 14:55 |
| *** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 14:55 | |
| *** jamesmca_ has joined #storyboard | 14:55 | |
| Zara | restarted my webclient, now the typeahead is completely broken \o/ | 14:58 |
| *** jamesmca_ has quit IRC | 15:01 | |
| *** jamesmcarthur has joined #storyboard | 15:04 | |
| *** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 15:08 | |
| *** matthewbodkin has joined #storyboard | 15:16 | |
| openstackgerrit | Adam Coldrick proposed openstack-infra/storyboard-webclient: Allow comments to be edited by their owner https://review.openstack.org/333418 | 15:22 |
| *** bethwhite- has joined #storyboard | 15:33 | |
| pedroalvarez | \o/ | 15:34 |
| dmsimard | oh hey that's a cool feature :p | 15:35 |
| *** jamesmcarthur has joined #storyboard | 15:36 | |
| anteaya | dmsimard: what is a cool feature? | 15:38 |
| dmsimard | comment editing ^ | 15:38 |
| anteaya | openstack's storyboard instances will not be allowing comment editing | 15:39 |
| dmsimard | oh ? | 15:39 |
| dmsimard | why not | 15:39 |
| *** jtomasek__ has quit IRC | 15:39 | |
| dmsimard | for history preservation ? | 15:39 |
| anteaya | dmsimard: AGREED: OpenStack should not need the ability for task tracker users | 15:40 |
| anteaya | to edit and delete comments, but would like the ability to disable | 15:40 |
| anteaya | that if it becomes a feature (fungi, 19:57:21) | 15:40 |
| anteaya | http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/infra/2016/infra.2016-07-05-19.02.txt | 15:40 |
| SotK | I think its partly that and partly concerns that people will think that editing makes things go away permanently | 15:40 |
| anteaya | yes for the ability to actually be able to consume things and rely on them | 15:40 |
| SotK | (when in fact things are sent out in emails, and we store history of edited comments that is visible to anyone) | 15:40 |
| dmsimard | hm, but it looks like the history is preserved and is available on demand, there could also be an integration like (launchpad I think?) where comments are editable for like 5 minutes and then afterwards they're not | 15:41 |
| *** jtomasek__ has joined #storyboard | 15:41 | |
| dmsimard | I'm not willing to fight for it, but I think the feature has value as someone who finds typos in his comments even after re-reading 5 times | 15:42 |
| anteaya | dmsimard: well the fight happened | 15:42 |
| anteaya | it is in the infra meeting logs | 15:42 |
| anteaya | and the agreement was the outcome and the one I posted | 15:42 |
| anteaya | I do hope that this doesn't continue to be a large game of whack a mole | 15:42 |
| anteaya | this could create a bikeshed in storyboard adoption where there really doesn't need to be one | 15:43 |
| dmsimard | what do you mean by game of whack a mole ? | 15:43 |
| Zara | I think it only blocks adoption if there's a preferable alternative for users. | 15:44 |
| anteaya | if would be a really shame of the only obstacle to storyboard adoption was a situation we created ourselves | 15:44 |
| dmsimard | features in storyboard that we don't want in the OpenStack context ? | 15:44 |
| anteaya | yes | 15:44 |
| fungi | dmsimard: why would that inhibit adoption? lp doesn't let you edit comments, so it's not a regression in functionality for projects moving from lp to sb | 15:44 |
| anteaya | we have a workflow of having history preserved of discussions | 15:44 |
| anteaya | like the infra meeting where the discussion and agreement took place | 15:45 |
| anteaya | so you don't have to take my word for anything, you can read it yourself | 15:45 |
| anteaya | with the confidence that the history is intact | 15:45 |
| * fungi promises he didn't edit his irc comments in that meeting ;) | 15:45 | |
| *** jtomasek__ has quit IRC | 15:45 | |
| dmsimard | fungi: I didn't mention adoption inhibition anywhere, don't get me wrong -- I just mentioned the feature implementation was thoughtful (in the sense that history was preserved) and it looked nice. I wasn't aware it was going to be disabled right out of the gate, that's all. | 15:46 |
| *** mrmartin has quit IRC | 15:46 | |
| anteaya | fungi: :) | 15:47 |
| anteaya | I would really like to not have to keep having this conversation, personally | 15:48 |
| anteaya | I would like to focus on the api and its documentation | 15:48 |
| dmsimard | sorry :( | 15:50 |
| fungi | dmsimard: to summarize the concern, people who read a lengthy discussion in sb prior to comments getting edited and those who read it after comments got edited can end up with completely contradictory understandings, so at a minimum you need some active mechanism for people to follow edits as they happen (perhaps via e-mail notification) before that becomes remotely sane | 15:50 |
| fungi | and even then it's a risk | 15:51 |
| dmsimard | fungi: it's okay, I can see both sides of the coin | 15:51 |
| fungi | whereas the "benefits" mentioned for being able to edit comments are that people can correct their typos, or can self-censor after a heavy night of binge drinking | 15:51 |
| fungi | but in those cases, for people using e-mail notification on sb your typos or rants have already landed in their inboxes and you can't undo that | 15:52 |
| Zara | dmsimard: as background, it was implemented as we personally found it irritating not being able to edit, were used to the feature in other software, and had had requests from other users. so those feelings clash with the concerns of those who want to operate something at scale, and this was the compromise. | 15:56 |
| dmsimard | yeah, having the feature and being able to toggle it on and off is fine | 15:56 |
| dmsimard | put toggles on all the things | 15:57 |
| dmsimard | users have preferences and that's life | 15:57 |
| anteaya | no it is configured for the instance | 15:57 |
| anteaya | not on the user level | 15:57 |
| anteaya | if you write something and I take the time to reply to it, I'm not interested in your comment changing whilst I compose my reply | 15:58 |
| anteaya | that erodes trust | 15:58 |
| dmsimard | anteaya: yes, I know the setting is instance-wide | 15:58 |
| anteaya | great | 15:59 |
| dmsimard | by user I referred to both end users and the operators | 15:59 |
| fungi | a "community preference" perhaps | 15:59 |
| Zara | :) in practice once the patches are a bit older, people on storyboard.openstack.org will only stumble across the feature if they actively go hunting through the code, so I doubt it'll continue to have a lot of discussion. | 15:59 |
| Zara | well, sotk and I will no doubt continue to get requests | 15:59 |
| SotK | community preference is a good way of putting it | 15:59 |
| Zara | yeah :) | 16:00 |
| dmsimard | my apologies for reviving a debate, I didn't know at all it was a hot topic. | 16:01 |
| fungi | that's the benefit i bring to openstack. i don't do any real work but i'm adept at making up terms | 16:01 |
| anteaya | dmsimard: if you have some time to review some api doc examples, I'm grateful: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:expand-api-docs+status:open | 16:03 |
| *** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 16:03 | |
| anteaya | I will respin the user tokens patch after I finish my lunch to incorporate SotK's most recent review | 16:03 |
| *** openstackgerrit has joined #storyboard | 16:03 | |
| *** alexismonville has quit IRC | 16:07 | |
| Zara | \o/ | 16:11 |
| anteaya | yay thank you | 16:13 |
| *** fay_ has quit IRC | 16:39 | |
| openstackgerrit | Anita Kuno proposed openstack-infra/storyboard: Add example commands for the User Tokens api https://review.openstack.org/339297 | 16:39 |
| anteaya | somehow I ended up with an .eggs/ dir on my last run of tox in storyboard | 16:40 |
| anteaya | an objection to me updating .gitignore to ignore that dir? | 16:41 |
| openstackgerrit | Anita Kuno proposed openstack-infra/storyboard: Update .gitignore to ignore all .egg things https://review.openstack.org/341670 | 16:46 |
| Zara | none from me, sounds like it shouldn't be there :) | 16:48 |
| anteaya | thanks | 16:49 |
| anteaya | I didn't want to look at it | 16:49 |
| anteaya | not sure what changed that it appeared | 16:49 |
| openstackgerrit | Anita Kuno proposed openstack-infra/storyboard: Remove the delete_all funciton from the user_tokens api https://review.openstack.org/341676 | 16:54 |
| anteaya | Zara: SotK do we like the user tokens patch yet? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/339297/2 | 16:55 |
| anteaya | SotK: thanks for the commands | 16:55 |
| *** matthewbodkin has quit IRC | 16:56 | |
| anteaya | Zara: thanks for the worklist commands, I will work on that next | 16:57 |
| anteaya | Zara: feel like merging the .gitignore since it has 2 +2's on it now? | 16:57 |
| anteaya | will save me the trouble of having this .eggs/ dir follow me around | 16:58 |
| Zara | sure | 16:58 |
| anteaya | thanks | 16:59 |
| *** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 17:05 | |
| openstackgerrit | Anita Kuno proposed openstack-infra/storyboard: Add example commands for the Worklists api https://review.openstack.org/340506 | 17:07 |
| anteaya | thanks Zara! | 17:07 |
| *** jamesmcarthur has joined #storyboard | 17:12 | |
| openstackgerrit | Anita Kuno proposed openstack-infra/storyboard: Add example commands for the Users api https://review.openstack.org/338570 | 17:17 |
| Zara | np! :) I'd add POSTs and PUTs, but I don't have time to check the syntax for curl for those rn | 17:18 |
| Zara | I'll get to it at some point if nobody does first | 17:18 |
| anteaya | understood, thank you for the commands thus far! | 17:18 |
| anteaya | thank you | 17:18 |
| anteaya | SotK: how are you feeling about the user_tokens patch at present? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/339297/2 | 17:19 |
| Zara | yw :) for GETs I generally work them out by browsing to https://storyboard.openstack.org/api/v1/ and then doing a bit of trial and error in the addressbar with the things listed as parameters (or things listed in the xml) | 17:20 |
| anteaya | I don't know what you mean by browsing https://storyboard.openstack.org/api/v1/ | 17:21 |
| anteaya | when I open that in a browser I get a 404 | 17:21 |
| anteaya | do you mean using that as a base url for the curl command? | 17:21 |
| Zara | yeah, it'll be a 404 until you stick something after it, so eg: https://storyboard.openstack.org/api/v1/worklists/ where you substitute 'worklists' for whatever you're hunting for | 17:22 |
| Zara | sometimes it's not that guessable but it works for me a fair amount of the time | 17:23 |
| *** mrmartin has joined #storyboard | 17:27 | |
| Zara | so you get the same data as you would using curl, the xml is just a bit easier on the eyes imo | 17:28 |
| anteaya | ah cool | 17:28 |
| anteaya | thank you, I didn't know I could to that, this is most helpful | 17:28 |
| Zara | glad to help! :D | 17:29 |
| Zara | right I'm off home, 'night! | 17:29 |
| anteaya | good night, thank you | 17:32 |
| *** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 17:36 | |
| *** alexismonville has joined #storyboard | 18:17 | |
| *** mrmartin has quit IRC | 18:19 | |
| *** alexismonville has quit IRC | 18:20 | |
| *** jamesmcarthur has joined #storyboard | 18:25 | |
| *** alexismonville has joined #storyboard | 18:27 | |
| *** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 18:30 | |
| *** alexismonville has quit IRC | 18:52 | |
| *** mrmartin has joined #storyboard | 19:01 | |
| *** mrmartin has quit IRC | 19:15 | |
| *** mrmartin has joined #storyboard | 19:18 | |
| *** mrmartin has quit IRC | 19:25 | |
| *** jamesmcarthur has joined #storyboard | 19:34 | |
| *** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 19:36 | |
| *** jamesmcarthur has joined #storyboard | 19:36 | |
| anteaya | okay so our db tests are currently failing: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack-infra/storyboard | 19:53 |
| anteaya | and it appears that the error: AttributeError: 'ExceptionContextImpl' object has no attribute 'engine' is only affecting storyboard, at least according to logstash | 19:54 |
| anteaya | so it appears that for some of our db tests a server either isn't created or is not responding to the wsme.api calls | 19:57 |
| anteaya | I wonder if Running upgrade 058 -> 059, Add a table for comment history is playing a role here | 20:05 |
| anteaya | my patches that still have passing jenkins tests last ran on July 7th | 20:06 |
| anteaya | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/339123/ | 20:06 |
| *** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 20:09 | |
| Zara | api patches have passed tests today and yesterday. (https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack-infra/storyboard) I don't think a change in storyboard has triggered it. | 20:14 |
| * Zara vanishes again | 20:14 | |
| *** alexismonville has joined #storyboard | 20:25 | |
| anteaya | this passed on July 11th: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/339557/ that is the most recent I can find | 20:29 |
| anteaya | I am not seeing api patches that passed tests today | 20:29 |
| anteaya | okay the tags api patch merged today: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/338532/ | 20:30 |
| anteaya | okay, well I am at a loss then as to what is creating this error | 20:30 |
| *** jamesmcarthur has joined #storyboard | 20:39 | |
| *** alexismonville has quit IRC | 20:50 | |
| SotK | a random sample of the failed and successful tests suggests to me that APScheduler 3.0.6 doesn't work, but APScheduler 3.2.0 does | 21:01 |
| SotK | idk why its started using the older version sometimes | 21:01 |
| *** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 21:13 | |
| anteaya | oh my | 21:14 |
| anteaya | thank you | 21:14 |
| anteaya | can you show me in the logs where you see the apscheduler version? | 21:14 |
| anteaya | SotK: I'll offer a patcht to adjust that version in requirements.txt | 21:15 |
| SotK | http://logs.openstack.org/97/339297/2/check/gate-storyboard-python34-db/c165765/console.html#_2016-07-13_16_59_54_928020 for a broken one | 21:16 |
| SotK | http://logs.openstack.org/22/338522/1/check/gate-storyboard-python34-db/b87dda8/console.html.gz#_2016-07-06_19_59_06_258514 for a working one | 21:16 |
| SotK | anteaya: thanks :) | 21:17 |
| anteaya | do you want to just pin to 3.2.0? | 21:17 |
| anteaya | currently it sits at apscheduler>=3.0.1,<3.1.0 | 21:17 |
| anteaya | I'll pin to 3.2.0 and go from there | 21:18 |
| SotK | that works for me | 21:19 |
| anteaya | thank you | 21:21 |
| openstackgerrit | Anita Kuno proposed openstack-infra/storyboard: Change apscheduler>=3.0.1,<3.1.0 to apscheduler>=3.2.0 https://review.openstack.org/341810 | 21:21 |
| anteaya | SotK: I will ping when jenkins passes on it | 21:22 |
| SotK | hmm, I wonder why the gate has been using 3.2.0 when we've had < 3.1.0 set since April | 21:23 |
| pleia2 | anteaya: is there anything holding up https://review.openstack.org/#/c/325474 process-wise, or does it just need reviews? | 21:31 |
| anteaya | pleia2: well it needs reviews, also Zara thought that it would conflict with betherly's interactive tutorial she wanted to do | 21:32 |
| anteaya | my problem is I have seen no interactive tutorial patches | 21:32 |
| anteaya | and I think our users would benefit from some form of overview | 21:33 |
| anteaya | I don't care if betherly creates it or not | 21:33 |
| anteaya | just that something exist | 21:33 |
| anteaya | pleia2: thanks for asking | 21:33 |
| pleia2 | anteaya: I don't know what form the interactive tutorial will come in, but I do find a lot of value in searchable, text-based documentation that explains things with words | 21:34 |
| betherly | anteaya: pleia2: sorry for the delay getting stuff up. can i suggest we look at it and merge it as a start and then as my one gets into review and looked at we can swap it out | 21:34 |
| pleia2 | so I would like to see something like this, even if it's part of an interactive tutorial, and with interest growing we should have *something* | 21:34 |
| anteaya | betherly: or have both, either way but thank you yes, I would like something | 21:35 |
| betherly | if work on something already exists in review it seems to make sense to me to get it in there and then see if we need either/or/both moving forward | 21:35 |
| anteaya | pleia2: great thanks, could you add your thoughts in a comment? | 21:35 |
| betherly | from the sounds of it though i think both side by side could be really useful | 21:35 |
| pleia2 | anteaya: will do | 21:35 |
| anteaya | betherly: oh thank you, do you have time to add your thoughts to https://review.openstack.org/#/c/325474 | 21:35 |
| anteaya | pleia2: thanks | 21:35 |
| betherly | anteaya: absolutely | 21:35 |
| anteaya | betherly: and I agree | 21:35 |
| anteaya | betherly: thank you | 21:35 |
| betherly | will take a look :) | 21:35 |
| anteaya | :) | 21:36 |
| anteaya | SotK: that is a good question, I do not know the answer | 21:41 |
| *** alexismonville has joined #storyboard | 21:41 | |
| anteaya | but on the other hand, 3.2.0 works | 21:41 |
| anteaya | but I dont' know what is over-riding requirements.txt | 21:41 |
| anteaya | oh also SotK Zara pedroalvarez congratulations on the new government, I hope they treat you better than the prior government | 21:42 |
| anteaya | SotK: nope that isn't the fix, this one installed 3.2.0 and failed: http://logs.openstack.org/10/341810/1/check/gate-storyboard-python34-db/00fb6b3/console.html#_2016-07-13_21_38_16_341868 | 21:43 |
| *** alexismonville has quit IRC | 21:43 | |
| anteaya | AttributeError: 'ExceptionContextImpl' object has no attribute 'engine'" | 21:43 |
| anteaya | :( | 21:43 |
| anteaya | betherly: thanks for the review | 21:45 |
| SotK | :( | 21:52 |
| * SotK has no more ideas | 21:52 | |
| SotK | re the government: I don't hold out much hope | 21:53 |
| anteaya | :( | 21:53 |
| anteaya | let's look at the test failures tomorrow, thanks for your time tonight | 21:54 |
| *** jamesmcarthur has joined #storyboard | 21:56 | |
| *** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 22:01 | |
| betherly | anteaya: np | 22:01 |
| *** alexismonville has joined #storyboard | 22:02 | |
| *** alexismonville has quit IRC | 22:06 | |
| *** jamesmcarthur has joined #storyboard | 22:25 | |
| *** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 22:33 | |
| *** jamesmcarthur has joined #storyboard | 22:36 | |
| *** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 22:40 | |
| *** jamesmcarthur has joined #storyboard | 22:44 | |
| *** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 22:51 | |
| *** jamesmcarthur has joined #storyboard | 22:54 | |
| *** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 22:56 | |
| *** jamesmcarthur has joined #storyboard | 22:58 | |
| *** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 23:00 | |
| *** jamesmcarthur has joined #storyboard | 23:01 | |
| *** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 23:06 | |
| *** jamesmcarthur has joined #storyboard | 23:06 | |
| *** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 23:08 | |
| *** jamesmcarthur has joined #storyboard | 23:19 | |
| *** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 23:21 | |
| *** jamesmcarthur has joined #storyboard | 23:23 | |
| *** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 23:32 | |
| *** jamesmcarthur has joined #storyboard | 23:43 | |
| *** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 23:46 | |
| *** jamesmcarthur has joined #storyboard | 23:47 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!