Thursday, 2015-04-02

notmynameclayg: mattoliverau: their twitter feed confirmed it. as did kemp. and vish. and our swiftstack employees who used to work there00:00
notmynameclayg: mattoliverau: assuming it were fake, it would be _terrible_ for their sales pipeline. they wouldn't joke about that00:01
mattoliveraupeluse: I assume a similar place will exist, there is a place holder for the summit. https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Design_Summit/Liberty usually (last time) we had our own etherpad to gather ideas, and then created the etherpads (on the kilo link) once we had a plan on what we wanted to talk about in each session00:02
mattoliveraunotmyname: true, well there you go then.. just a bad day to annouce.. but I guess sometimes you can't control that. Looks like Matt Garrett has moved to coreOS.00:03
torgomaticmattoliverau: glad to hear it00:03
claygtorgomatic: how's this for blow your mind - the proxy diff is smaller than the diskfile diff (!?)00:03
torgomaticclayg: uh00:03
claygi think it was all the diskfile tests00:04
claygor maybe the suffix hashes00:04
notmynamemattoliverau: peluse: so far, the etherpad is at https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Design_Summit/Planning00:04
notmynamemattoliverau: peluse: however, this is something we need to discuss00:04
notmynameremember earlier at the meeting when I said I didn't want to get too distracted by it this week? ;-)00:04
claygprobably the tests - we reogranized the diskfile test module like *a lot*00:04
notmynameso we need to decide if we use etherpads like last time or if we use the old system that we used to have to propose talks00:05
notmynameand that's something I wanted to discuss more at the next meeting00:05
claygtorgomatic: yeah it was tests - like 4.5K lines just in test_diskfile00:06
mattoliveraunotmyname: I remember that's fine :)00:06
mattoliverauWe still have plenty of time :)00:06
clayghrmm... yeah our ratio on tests in the proxy change isn't very good for all the lines we added to obj/controller :\00:06
claygi mean it's like 2:1 tests to code instead of 4:100:06
claygso isn't very good ~= not super insanely over done right00:07
notmyname:-)00:10
notmynameIIRC storage policies were something like 3:1 tests to code00:10
notmynameok, with an eye to ec_review landing, and based on what I said at the meeting about what else is in the upcoming release, I starred some more stuff in gerrit00:17
notmynamewhen clayg proposes the ec_review chain, I'll update it00:17
*** thumpba_ has quit IRC00:17
openstackgerritSamuel Merritt proposed openstack/swift: EC: support multiple ranges for GET requests  https://review.openstack.org/16657600:24
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift00:25
*** erlon has quit IRC00:31
*** rdaly2 has joined #openstack-swift00:33
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-swift00:38
*** annegentle has quit IRC00:43
*** haigang has joined #openstack-swift00:59
*** logan2 has quit IRC01:19
*** bkopilov has quit IRC01:20
*** logan2 has joined #openstack-swift01:21
*** kota_ has joined #openstack-swift01:23
kota_good morning, again01:24
mattoliveraukota_: moring...again01:24
claygok, neat - so you know how PUT with x-copy-from works between ec and repl because of that trick we do in GETorHEAD to recreate the controller instead of calling into self01:24
claygwe don't do that in copy - and up until now I don't think I knew this was broken01:24
claygwhich is .... werid .... because functests caught it - the versioning middleware tests acctually01:25
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-swift01:39
*** annegentle has quit IRC01:44
claygcharz: i'm not seeing any of our community cluster jobs on any new-ish reviews?01:48
charzclayg: checking01:49
claygyeah sorry i don't remember how to troubleshoot01:49
clayg.... err well like that system :P01:49
claygis there like a wiki page some basics?  I'm not sure how much of it is really public infrastructure vs maybe some stuff we have internally?01:50
charzclayg: There is 21 jobs in the queue and jenkin is going to consume it.01:51
*** panbalag has joined #openstack-swift02:05
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-swift02:15
*** panbalag has quit IRC02:20
openstackgerritpaul luse proposed openstack/swift: Erasure Code Reconstructor  https://review.openstack.org/13187202:32
openstackgerritpaul luse proposed openstack/swift: EC Reconstructor Probe Tests  https://review.openstack.org/16429102:33
openstackgerritpaul luse proposed openstack/swift: Fix ssync sender behavior for EC reconstructor jobs  https://review.openstack.org/16905202:33
*** jrichli has quit IRC02:36
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-swift02:40
*** annegentle has quit IRC02:45
*** ujjain has quit IRC02:46
pelusewent through the cards on trello and updated a few - a few needs updates from others as well so if you're working on EC stuff please check/update your cards - thanks!!03:02
*** rdaly2 has quit IRC03:12
openstackgerritpaul luse proposed openstack/swift: Erasure Code Reconstructor  https://review.openstack.org/13187203:17
openstackgerritpaul luse proposed openstack/swift: EC Reconstructor Probe Tests  https://review.openstack.org/16429103:18
openstackgerritpaul luse proposed openstack/swift: Fix ssync sender behavior for EC reconstructor jobs  https://review.openstack.org/16905203:19
openstackgerritMatthew Oliver proposed openstack/swift: EC: support multiple ranges for GET requests  https://review.openstack.org/16657603:19
peluseyeah baby!03:20
mattoliverautorgomatic: ^^ found a slight difference with ranged get output when comparing EC and REPL.. there is a quick fix03:20
*** silor has joined #openstack-swift03:24
*** h_m has quit IRC03:31
claygsooooo.... any ideas on COPY03:38
claygi'm not having any luck *not* getting failing functests on ec_review or feature/ec03:38
claygfor the version middleware stuff03:38
claygoh weird, it only fails... sometimes?  that's got to be worse.03:39
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-swift03:41
*** h_m has joined #openstack-swift03:43
claygok, i'm confused COPY /path/to/ec -H destination /path/to/repl - works03:43
claygCOPY /path/to/repl -H destination: /path/to/ec - 503's03:44
claygthe error in the end is from the object server complaining aobut not having a frag index to stick on the data file03:44
clayg... but it's making all the connections - maybe it *is* in the right controller?03:45
*** gvernik has joined #openstack-swift03:46
claygoh, that's probably just cause the replication controller is still picking the right ring :\03:49
claygyeah that's all that is03:49
*** annegentle has quit IRC03:50
claygand so why does a put to the repl policy work if we're in the ec controller03:50
claygoh it's all that putter if policy.requires footers and junk03:51
*** jamielennox is now known as jamielennox|away03:51
*** gvernik has quit IRC03:54
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-swift04:02
*** ho has quit IRC04:03
claygwell that was easy -> https://gist.github.com/clayg/17e50bccc378633c53e004:03
clayg^ someone should care about applything that to feature/ec maybe?04:05
*** Bsony has joined #openstack-swift04:13
claygworks all the way up through the proxy -> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/169985/04:21
claygI think I did it right04:21
*** bkopilov has joined #openstack-swift04:30
*** gvernik has joined #openstack-swift04:38
*** km has joined #openstack-swift04:45
*** gvernik has quit IRC04:48
*** Bsony has quit IRC05:11
*** zaitcev has quit IRC05:12
*** zhill has joined #openstack-swift05:19
*** thumpba has joined #openstack-swift05:23
*** thumpba has quit IRC05:26
mattoliverauclayg: did you want me to raise your copy fix as a patch?05:38
*** annegentle has quit IRC05:39
mattoliverauI'm about to disappear (in 30 mins or so) to go camping for the long weekend, but am happy to raise it.. just patched locally and running tests now05:39
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-swift05:40
*** annegentle has quit IRC05:45
*** mmcardle has quit IRC05:46
claygmattoliverau: nah fuck it05:51
claygi'm over feature/ec - ec_review is where it's at05:51
claygacoles_away: peluse: when you guys get up just merge *all* that reconstructor/ssync stuff - it'll be up on ec_review tomorrow evening and we can keep beating on it there.05:52
claygok - well *jenkins* likes ec_review anyway - ya'll get on it - i'm out!05:54
mattoliverauclayg: night man, happy easter05:54
openstackgerritMatthew Oliver proposed openstack/swift: Make sure COPY requests are routed correctly  https://review.openstack.org/17000305:56
mattoliverauToo bad there it is ^^ adandon it if you want to, but at least now it's in the system :P05:57
*** haigang has quit IRC06:02
*** ppai has joined #openstack-swift06:07
*** haigang has joined #openstack-swift06:12
*** SkyRocknRoll has joined #openstack-swift06:23
*** SkyRocknRoll has joined #openstack-swift06:23
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-swift06:41
cschwedeGood morning!06:41
*** annegentle has quit IRC06:46
mattoliveraumorning cschwede06:54
*** chlong has quit IRC06:55
*** geaaru has joined #openstack-swift07:03
*** Bsony has joined #openstack-swift07:10
*** jistr has joined #openstack-swift07:13
*** jordanP has joined #openstack-swift07:14
*** rdaly2 has joined #openstack-swift07:18
*** rdaly2 has quit IRC07:23
*** haigang has quit IRC07:30
*** haigang has joined #openstack-swift07:35
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-swift07:42
*** annegentle has quit IRC07:47
*** zhill has quit IRC07:48
*** acoles_away is now known as acoles07:49
acolesgood morning07:49
acolesmattoliverau: have fun camping07:55
*** haigang has quit IRC07:56
*** Bsony has quit IRC07:58
*** jordanP has quit IRC07:59
*** vinsh has quit IRC08:01
*** haigang has joined #openstack-swift08:02
*** silor has quit IRC08:04
*** krykowski has joined #openstack-swift08:11
*** haigang has quit IRC08:24
*** vinsh has joined #openstack-swift08:24
*** haigang has joined #openstack-swift08:28
*** krykowski has quit IRC08:36
*** jordanP has joined #openstack-swift08:37
*** krykowski has joined #openstack-swift08:39
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-swift08:43
*** annegentle has quit IRC08:48
*** zhill has joined #openstack-swift08:48
*** zhill has quit IRC08:53
*** Bsony has joined #openstack-swift08:58
*** joeljwright has joined #openstack-swift09:00
*** Bsony has quit IRC09:03
*** krykowski has quit IRC09:12
*** krykowski has joined #openstack-swift09:13
*** rdaly2 has joined #openstack-swift09:20
*** haigang has quit IRC09:24
*** rdaly2 has quit IRC09:24
*** jistr has quit IRC09:26
*** dmorita has quit IRC09:31
*** haigang has joined #openstack-swift09:40
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-swift09:43
*** jistr has joined #openstack-swift09:44
*** annegentle has quit IRC09:48
*** zhill has joined #openstack-swift09:49
*** zhill has quit IRC09:54
*** bobby2 has quit IRC09:57
*** bobby2 has joined #openstack-swift09:58
*** mlanner has quit IRC10:05
*** remix_tj has quit IRC10:06
*** remix_tj has joined #openstack-swift10:06
*** silor has joined #openstack-swift10:10
*** mlanner has joined #openstack-swift10:11
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC10:37
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-swift10:44
*** annegentle has quit IRC10:49
*** zhill has joined #openstack-swift10:50
*** haigang has quit IRC10:55
*** zhill has quit IRC10:55
*** rdaly2 has joined #openstack-swift11:21
*** haigang has joined #openstack-swift11:23
*** rdaly2 has quit IRC11:26
*** joeljwright has quit IRC11:27
*** km has quit IRC11:30
*** links has joined #openstack-swift11:33
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-swift11:45
*** annegentle has quit IRC11:50
*** zhill has joined #openstack-swift11:51
*** tongli has joined #openstack-swift11:52
*** zhill has quit IRC11:56
*** panbalag has joined #openstack-swift11:59
*** kota_ has quit IRC12:00
*** kei_yama has quit IRC12:03
acolespeluse: fyi i have a few changes on 169052, lets touch base before merging with ec recon. bbiab getting lunch12:13
*** bkopilov has quit IRC12:15
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-swift12:26
*** ppai has quit IRC12:29
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-swift12:32
*** annegentle has quit IRC12:33
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-swift12:39
*** ujjain has joined #openstack-swift12:48
*** zhill has joined #openstack-swift12:52
*** zhill has quit IRC12:56
*** chlong has joined #openstack-swift13:01
*** SkyRocknRoll has quit IRC13:07
*** joeljwright has joined #openstack-swift13:07
*** Gues_____ has joined #openstack-swift13:07
*** annegentle has quit IRC13:09
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-swift13:20
*** joeljwright has quit IRC13:20
*** fanyaohong has joined #openstack-swift13:22
*** annegentle has quit IRC13:23
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-swift13:23
*** Gues_____ has quit IRC13:32
*** zigo has quit IRC13:38
*** zigo_ is now known as zigo13:41
*** erlon has joined #openstack-swift13:42
*** petertr7 has joined #openstack-swift13:43
*** welldannit has quit IRC13:45
*** chlong has quit IRC13:47
*** zhill has joined #openstack-swift13:53
*** zhill has quit IRC13:58
*** mahatic has joined #openstack-swift13:59
*** Bsony has joined #openstack-swift14:04
*** haigang has quit IRC14:08
*** Bsony has quit IRC14:11
*** Guest__ has joined #openstack-swift14:14
*** bkopilov has joined #openstack-swift14:17
*** aix has joined #openstack-swift14:18
*** aix has quit IRC14:19
*** aix has joined #openstack-swift14:20
*** jrichli has joined #openstack-swift14:25
*** links has quit IRC14:26
*** Bsony has joined #openstack-swift14:30
*** vinsh has quit IRC14:32
*** bkopilov has quit IRC14:34
openstackgerritAlistair Coles proposed openstack/swift: Fix ssync sender behavior for EC reconstructor jobs  https://review.openstack.org/16905214:42
acolespeluse: ^^ i'm done with this, you want me to squash into 131872 or are you going to?14:43
*** rdaly2 has joined #openstack-swift14:44
*** vinsh has joined #openstack-swift14:48
acolespeluse: actually, did clayg mean squash the two or just approve them to merge on feature/ec?14:49
*** rdaly2 has quit IRC14:49
*** Guest__ has quit IRC14:50
tdasilvaacoles: hi! I was wondering if it would make sense to squash patch 167595 and its dependencies or just leave as is...any thoughts?14:51
patchbottdasilva: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/167595/14:51
*** zhill has joined #openstack-swift14:54
*** Bsony has quit IRC14:55
*** lpabon has joined #openstack-swift14:56
*** Bsony has joined #openstack-swift14:57
*** zhill has quit IRC14:58
acolestdasilva: hi! could be, let me go take a look14:59
*** Guest__ has joined #openstack-swift15:01
*** Bsony has quit IRC15:13
peluseacoles, I don't think he cared which way we did it15:16
pelusejust that we did it :)15:16
*** Guest__ has quit IRC15:18
*** swiftops has quit IRC15:18
tdasilvapeluse: happy birthday! :-)15:18
peluseheh, thanks!15:18
peluseand I'm stuck in an all day meeting today - just fantastic :(15:19
pelusebut I managed to get 2 workouts in already this morning (started at 5:15) so I'm feeling good about that!15:19
tdasilvawell...party all night ;)15:19
peluseacoles, hey I dig the job['purge'] addition...15:21
acolespeluse: thx. i tried to make it a callback to reconstruct_fa but the remembered time was of the essence ;)15:24
acolespeluse: happy b'day!15:25
pelusesweet, I just +2'd it.  Can you go review the probe test patch real quick, its small15:25
jrichlipeluse: happy birthday!15:25
peluseacoles, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/164291/15:25
pelusethanks!!!15:25
acolespeluse: k15:27
peluseacoles, and clay +2'd patch 131872 if you have time to go over the latest changes there as well.  There's still work to do on but its 'good enough' to get us started15:27
patchbotpeluse: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/131872/15:27
peluseoh man, did I just say that :(15:27
acolespeluse: k, i'm in a meeting for a while but will get there15:28
pelusegracias15:30
*** h_m has quit IRC15:34
*** me has joined #openstack-swift15:34
*** me is now known as Guest853015:35
Guest8530Hi guys! i have a qt ; If I add a drive to a storage node, and after rebalancing the ring on the proxy-server, do i have to copy the *.ring.gz to /etc/swift of my storage nodes anew?15:35
mandarineGuest8530: yes15:36
mandarine(as far as i know)15:36
*** silor has quit IRC15:37
peluseanyone see this bp on versioned objects for Swift? https://blueprints.launchpad.net/swift/+spec/versioned-objects  Doesn't seem like we need this to address the issues its helping solve for other proejcts, no?15:37
*** joeljwright has joined #openstack-swift15:39
*** dspinner has joined #openstack-swift15:39
*** dspinner has quit IRC15:41
peluseGuest8530, yes mandarine is correct15:46
tdasilvapeluse: the name of the BP is confusing at first in the context of swift15:46
peluseindeed, its targeted at the other proejcts I think and tossed up at us to see if its relevant, I'm thinking its not but wanted to get others to chime in15:46
pelusean intel guy submitted it so, ya know :)15:47
tdasilvapeluse: got it :-)15:52
*** zhill has joined #openstack-swift15:55
*** krykowski has quit IRC15:55
*** zhill has quit IRC15:59
*** Nadeem has joined #openstack-swift16:00
*** lpabon has quit IRC16:01
*** aix has quit IRC16:07
acolespeluse: since when was +457/-9 a 'small' review? :P16:09
openstackgerritThiago da Silva proposed openstack/swift: Select policy when running functional test  https://review.openstack.org/16759516:14
tdasilvaacoles, jrichli: squashed ^^^16:14
acolestdasilva: good call16:15
* acoles is slow today16:15
tdasilvaacoles: talked to jrichli and we thought there could some confusing between the first patch and kota's patch16:15
tdasilvas/confusing/confusion16:15
*** Bsony has joined #openstack-swift16:19
*** silor has joined #openstack-swift16:20
acolestdasilva: so clayg made some good comments a few days back about not overriding the cluster's default with specified which i think had merit16:21
acolestdasilva: but makes sense to review it all in one patch16:21
peluseacoles, heh, anymore it seems that way!16:21
peluseOK, I gotta head into work and will be in an al day meeting.  Will be on/off IRC16:21
acolespeluse: well you enjoy that now :P16:22
jrichlitdasilva: thanks!16:22
*** jistr has quit IRC16:23
*** Bsony has quit IRC16:24
*** lcurtis has joined #openstack-swift16:29
*** silor has quit IRC16:29
*** zhill has joined #openstack-swift16:35
tdasilvaacoles: mmm...not sure about that, honestly I thought the purpose of this was to exactly override the cluster's default.16:35
tdasilvaI prefer to be able to tell that all tests are running against the same policy16:36
tdasilvainstead of just some of them16:37
notmynamegood morning16:37
claygtdasilva: that's fine - but the test that was written to validate when you create a container with-out specifiying the policy it gets created with the *default* policy - should just be skipped then?16:38
*** zhill has quit IRC16:40
tdasilvaclayg: well, it can be run that way too right? so if you don't set the env. variable it will run again the default policy. it is only when you set the default policy that you are (in my mind) saying: don't use the default, but use this one instead16:40
tdasilvas/when you set the default policy/when you set the environment variable16:40
*** Bsony has joined #openstack-swift16:41
claygcharz: community links are 404'ing -> e.g. why'd this py26 job fail?  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/169986/116:43
acolestdasilva: clayg: i guess the point of that test though is to send a request with *no* policy header and check that the *cluster* assigns its default. So we need to not have the func test hook insert a policy header for that case. somehow! And we need the policy collection to have retained a notion of what the cluster default is so that that test can verify its result.16:44
*** bkopilov has joined #openstack-swift16:45
claygacoles: +1 it's a behavior the cluster has, i see no reason you wouldn't functionally test it - tdasilva points out you could test it by *not* seeing the env var - but then the func func tests "for policy in policies + ''"16:47
acolesso maybe we need a way for that test to inhibit the func test 'specified policy ' being applied16:48
claygtdasilva: maybe the test could evolve - i'm not sure about the the idea that functests with a "specified" policy don't use other policies - some of the tests are cross policy - you're just picking one to start with and the selecting a random other, right?16:48
*** geaaru has quit IRC16:49
tdasilvaclayg: yeah16:49
claygacoles: how do we allow the test to create non-specified policies?16:50
claygsetdefault or something?16:50
acolesidk, stick something in the req.environ 'swift.do.not.override.policy' so that jrichli hooks don't get applied?16:51
acolesor is it using swift_test_client...16:51
claygacoles: can we just use 'x-storage-policy': '' to indicate to the setdefault part it should pop('x-storage-policy') - if we want to let tests do that (instead of just skipping them since a "use whatever policy the cluster likes" isn't really a thing in specified storage policy land?)16:51
claygi can see both sides16:51
claygthe only thing I don't like is doing something other than what the test says on the tin ;)16:51
claygust raise skiptest if policy.specified16:52
acolesi can never remember if swob request keeps 'x-storage-policy': '' in the header dict or treats it as a delete16:52
acolesif it does then that would work16:53
acolessince jrichli hook checks for 'x-storage-policy' already in headers before overriding *iirc*16:53
*** joeljwright has quit IRC16:55
*** jordanP has quit IRC16:56
acolesclayg: jrichli : i think clayg's idea might work i.e. have that test set  'x-storage-policy': '' to prevent the specified_policy being applied16:57
*** thumpba has joined #openstack-swift16:58
acoles(its  'x-storage-policy'= None that the HEaderEnvironProxy treats as a delete, '' is stored)16:58
*** rdaly2 has joined #openstack-swift16:58
acolestdasilva: ^^16:58
acolesah, but does that result in a 400 from the proxy? we could strip it out before sending17:00
*** EmilienM is now known as EmilienM|afk17:01
*** thumpba_ has joined #openstack-swift17:01
acolesclayg: did you see the final bullet point on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/169052/ commit msg?17:02
*** annegentle has quit IRC17:03
*** thumpba has quit IRC17:04
tdasilvasorry, i'm back...reading log now17:04
*** lcurtis has quit IRC17:07
tdasilvaacoles, clayg: the idea of 'x-storage-policy': '' sounds interesting...let me give it a try17:08
acolestdasilva: thx!17:09
peluseclayg, not sure if you saw the scrollback - I'm stuck in an all day meeting and basically as worthless as tits on a bull today17:24
pelusebut wanted to see where the thinking is on freezing feature/ec - land multi range and maybe mattoliverau copy fix first?17:24
acolesclayg: peluse i am midway reviewing ec probe tests17:25
peluseand then next thing you'd like to see me on - reviews, docs or start some ECrecon fixup, or other?  I'm open for whatever (starting in the am other than monitoring IRC today)17:25
peluseacoles, thanks17:25
acolesi had similar question - there's comments on EC Recon, particularly ssync pieces, that i can work on fixing? if so, do we paste diffs on feature/ec-review comments now or what?17:27
acolesclayg: ^^17:27
peluseyup, lets nail the details on how/where we work for the next week or so and make sure we're all on the same page17:28
acolespeluse: +1 btw i am out of the loop sunday-tuesday on family break so use/abuse me while i am here!17:29
pelusedid notmyname approve that break?17:31
peluse:)17:31
acolespeluse: heh17:32
* acoles has peluse-style 'all day meetings' sunday-tuesday17:32
peluseahhh, so beer is involved.  nice17:33
*** zhill has joined #openstack-swift17:41
openstackgerritMerged openstack/swift: Erasure Code Reconstructor  https://review.openstack.org/13187217:43
openstackgerritMerged openstack/swift: Fix ssync sender behavior for EC reconstructor jobs  https://review.openstack.org/16905217:45
openstackgerritMerged openstack/swift: EC Reconstructor Probe Tests  https://review.openstack.org/16429117:45
openstackgerritMerged openstack/swift: Make sure COPY requests are routed correctly  https://review.openstack.org/17000317:45
jrichliacoles clayg tdasilva: just got back from lunch.  reading scrollback.17:45
notmynameok, am meetings done. now to check on patch statuses17:53
notmynamewell look at that. the reconstructor just landed on feature/ec. that's great!17:53
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-swift17:58
*** welldannit has joined #openstack-swift18:03
acolespeluse: so as a start how about i pick up any outstanding comments wrt ssync and recon interaction with ssync tomorrow?18:08
acolespeluse: i prep a diff and leave it on the review comments?18:11
acolesnotmyname: clayg: is that how we're making fixes now, paste diffs on ec-review's for clayg to apply?18:12
*** annegentle has quit IRC18:20
acolesclayg: nice probe tests18:23
*** EmilienM|afk is now known as EmilienM18:30
*** bkopilov has quit IRC18:41
*** bkopilov has joined #openstack-swift18:50
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-swift18:53
*** acoles is now known as acoles_away18:57
*** annegentle has quit IRC18:59
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-swift18:59
*** ChanServ changes topic to "Topic: Soft freeze of master in effect | EC Merge plan: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ec_merge_plan | Review Dashboard: http://goo.gl/vysJqI | Logs: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-swift/"19:01
notmynamereview dashboard link updated. it now includes the feature/ec_review branch in the EC work. I also starred those patches19:01
notmyname(if you want a CLI for pulling starred patches in gerrit, this is what I use https://github.com/notmyname/git-stats/blob/master/get_stars.py)19:06
notmynamein combination with GeekTool (http://projects.tynsoe.org/en/geektool/) I now have all of the starred patches on my desktop19:06
openstackgerritRichard Hawkins proposed openstack/swift: Add additional func tests for TempURLs  https://review.openstack.org/15598519:07
*** zaitcev has joined #openstack-swift19:21
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v zaitcev19:21
*** Bsony has quit IRC19:31
*** mahatic has quit IRC19:33
*** rdaly2 has quit IRC19:39
*** lcurtis has joined #openstack-swift19:41
peluseacoles_away, sounds good.  yeah so we dont duplicate effort comments for what you're working on are great.  I'll do the same but I'llhave zero time today anyways L(19:42
*** mahatic has joined #openstack-swift19:46
*** panbalag has quit IRC19:57
openstackgerritThiago da Silva proposed openstack/swift: Select policy when running functional test  https://review.openstack.org/16759520:09
*** panbalag has joined #openstack-swift20:12
*** panbalag has quit IRC20:20
clayghey guys!20:21
claygsorry i've been in meetings!  doh!20:21
claygi'm going to start merging the reconstructor into ec_review - i'll have something up tonight - i'll probably refactor a few of things I pointed out in the review while I go20:22
claygacoles_away: no i didn't see that - so you got the protcol fix in there!?  can't wait to see it!20:23
claygpeluse: acoles_away: the best way to contribute now is on feature ec_review - take a break from the reconstructor - help me validate everything we have on ec_review and you guys can pick up on the reconstructor and ssync it comes back online in ec_review20:25
claygpeluse: acoles_away: I *am* done with feature/ec - multi-range GET was the only thing I saw - if that lands while we're on ec_review we can look at brining it over in the 11th hour - or we can ship without it?  Same thing for some of the reconstrutor clean up - everything we get in beyond "it works" is just lagniappe20:26
claygnotmyname: torgomatic: I need help with the commit messages on ec_review20:27
notmynameclayg: at 3?20:27
claygyou want to pair on it at 3 PST?20:28
claygsorry - not clear what your question was?20:28
notmynameya. lunch now, then meeting for me20:28
claygpeluse: mattoliverau: I went ahead and merged copy fix to feature/ec even though i already implemented it on ec_review - just to make it easier to see the what left in the diff between the branches20:29
claygall - EC-REVIEW IS *READY*20:30
claygeverything from the storage policy object controller diskfile - it all works - the reconstructor is coming, but I have no doubt it will be done before you make your way through all of the reviews that are there (even docs!)20:30
claygI'd love to get some feedback fixes rolling in - nit away!20:31
clayger... you give nits and gripes - i'll make cleanup and fixes20:31
clayg- unless it's docs - then just push push push - peluse wrote most of them so the spelling is only slightly better than if I would have done it20:31
*** lcurtis has quit IRC20:32
annegentleclayg: I like your style.20:35
claygannegentle: do you really have an irc flag on *docs*?20:36
*** Bsony has joined #openstack-swift20:37
claygdoes anyone know why acoles_away added the 'fragments' key to ECDiskFileManager's _gather_on_disk_files?20:38
annegentleclayg: I like interruptions super infrequently :)20:40
*** mahatic has quit IRC20:43
claygannegentle: awwwwww (that's funny)20:46
*** lcurtis has joined #openstack-swift20:48
*** annegentle has quit IRC20:51
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-swift20:54
*** annegentle has quit IRC20:55
*** sgza has joined #openstack-swift20:58
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-swift21:01
*** lpabon has joined #openstack-swift21:02
*** lcurtis has quit IRC21:03
*** sgza has quit IRC21:09
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC21:16
*** panbalag has joined #openstack-swift21:16
*** panbalag has quit IRC21:17
*** Bsony has quit IRC21:21
tdasilvaclayg: nits coming :P21:34
*** fanyaohong_ has joined #openstack-swift21:34
*** zacksh has quit IRC21:35
*** wer has quit IRC21:37
*** morganfainberg has quit IRC21:37
*** morganfainberg has joined #openstack-swift21:37
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-swift21:37
*** fanyaohong has quit IRC21:38
*** acorwin has quit IRC21:38
*** jasondotstar has quit IRC21:38
*** fanyaohong_ is now known as fanyaohong21:38
*** zacksh has joined #openstack-swift21:39
*** jasondotstar has joined #openstack-swift21:39
*** acorwin has joined #openstack-swift21:39
*** lpabon has quit IRC21:41
*** annegentle has quit IRC21:44
claygtdasilva: thanks bro!21:45
peluseclayg, not sure if read all the way back but I'm stuck in an all day meeting - just have a few minutes free and then will be back in meetingville but I saw your note above and 10-4 that!21:51
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-swift22:02
*** jrichli has quit IRC22:06
*** annegentle has quit IRC22:11
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-swift22:12
*** tongli has quit IRC22:23
*** annegentle has quit IRC22:27
*** km has joined #openstack-swift22:38
*** zhill has quit IRC22:46
*** welldannit has quit IRC22:51
*** zhill has joined #openstack-swift22:53
*** Nadeem has quit IRC22:57
claygi've got a doc comment - so i'm going to play with the workflow of pulling in upstream changes to the doc patch and including them in my rebase (which is about to include the reconstructer!)23:04
vinshHey. Curious... have a cluster up.. have swift-recon-cron running.. but instead of a 0 for async_pending.. all I get is "NULL"23:05
vinshWhat am I missing?23:05
vinshThe googlesphere comes up empty so far.23:05
vinshAh. Maybe it just took some time for the recon cache to catch up. NO sooner did I ask and I see a couple nodes with non NULL replies.23:07
vinshAll set.23:07
notmynamevinsh: great!23:11
vinsh:)23:11
*** occupant has joined #openstack-swift23:16
claygawww you guys are revewing ec-review - thanks thanks thanks!!!23:16
peluseso for doc - do you still want push over changes on that patch?23:21
*** vinsh has quit IRC23:21
notmynamepeluse: yes23:27
claygpeluse: yes23:28
pelusecool, will add some more typos tomorrow morning :)23:29
notmynamelol23:30
*** petertr7 has quit IRC23:31
*** kei_yama has joined #openstack-swift23:32
claygpeluse: I think the big risk is when I push up a rebase while people are hacking - basically around this time or later each day I'm going to push up all the fixes I've collected and reset the state of the world (including anything that's landed in docs throughout the day)23:32
claygbut if you've got open non-published changes when I rebase the change you'll be stuck having to rebase your fixes on the change upstream before you push23:32
peluseno sweat23:33
*** thumpba_ has quit IRC23:37
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-swift23:41
claygnice cinder is working on "storage policies"23:44
claygyay thingee!23:45
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC23:45
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-swift23:46
notmynamethat's cool23:48
*** erlon has quit IRC23:51
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift23:53
*** annegentle has quit IRC23:57

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!