*** bobh has joined #openstack-mistral | 00:19 | |
*** bobh has quit IRC | 00:26 | |
*** bobh has joined #openstack-mistral | 00:34 | |
*** bobh has quit IRC | 00:45 | |
*** jamielennox is now known as jamielennox|away | 01:02 | |
*** jamielennox|away is now known as jamielennox | 01:17 | |
*** bobh has joined #openstack-mistral | 02:04 | |
*** harlowja has quit IRC | 02:44 | |
*** sharatss has quit IRC | 03:18 | |
*** sharatss has joined #openstack-mistral | 03:18 | |
rakhmerov | kong: yes | 03:28 |
---|---|---|
rakhmerov | kong: ready to release Mistral this week? | 03:29 |
rakhmerov | not now, pls wait till Fri | 03:29 |
rakhmerov | or Thu evening | 03:29 |
kong | rakhmerov: yep, i'm ready, it's up to the team for when | 03:29 |
rakhmerov | ok | 03:30 |
kong | and after rc-3 release, we could decide if we should create our ocata stable branch | 03:30 |
kong | sorry, b3 | 03:30 |
rakhmerov | yes | 03:30 |
rakhmerov | we'll need it | 03:30 |
rakhmerov | as usually | 03:30 |
*** thrash is now known as thrash|g0ne | 03:37 | |
rakhmerov | kong: I added more comments in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/414508/ | 03:38 |
rakhmerov | pls take a look | 03:38 |
kong | rakhmerov: ok, thanks for review. but i'm afraid that feature will be delayed to Pike, given the rc is only for bugs | 03:39 |
rakhmerov | most likely, yes | 03:39 |
rakhmerov | but at least we need to finalize the spec | 03:39 |
rakhmerov | I believe we're close already | 03:40 |
kong | rakhmerov: yep, we could merge it in O, and start coding in P | 03:40 |
rakhmerov | yes | 03:40 |
rakhmerov | btw, we'll probably need to move some specs from approved/ocata to approved/pike | 03:41 |
rakhmerov | kong: how's life in general? | 03:41 |
rakhmerov | work, family? | 03:41 |
kong | sure, as soon as we release b3, we could do that | 03:41 |
kong | rakhmerov: not bad, more time with the kid | 03:42 |
kong | especially after my parents-in-law went back to China | 03:42 |
rakhmerov | :) | 03:42 |
rakhmerov | maybe not a bad thing, hah? | 03:43 |
rakhmerov | :) | 03:43 |
rakhmerov | that they moved back :) | 03:43 |
kong | i only have my own time after 10PM sometimes even after 11PM | 03:43 |
kong | yeah, they will come again after 6 months | 03:43 |
kong | according to the NZ visa regulation | 03:43 |
rakhmerov | I see | 03:44 |
rakhmerov | I'm just kidding | 03:44 |
kong | haha | 03:44 |
kong | how about you | 03:44 |
kong | still work remote? | 03:44 |
rakhmerov | pretty often people have difficult relationships with parents-in-law | 03:44 |
rakhmerov | maybe you're not one of them | 03:44 |
kong | rakhmerov: not for me | 03:44 |
rakhmerov | yes, I'm still remote | 03:44 |
rakhmerov | I'm more or less fine | 03:44 |
rakhmerov | just started thinking how to improve Mistral development process | 03:45 |
rakhmerov | if you have any recommendations I'm all ears | 03:45 |
kong | i have been thinking how to convince more people to use mistral | 03:45 |
rakhmerov | kong: I really believe that we're still missing some important features | 03:46 |
rakhmerov | like cool actions, visualization tool etc | 03:46 |
rakhmerov | comprehensive docs | 03:46 |
rakhmerov | although we made a good progress on docs | 03:46 |
rakhmerov | in the previous 6-8 months | 03:47 |
rakhmerov | OpenStack actions need to be fully rewritten and refactored | 03:47 |
kong | from my side(or feedback from my colleagues), supporting scripts is definitely useful | 03:47 |
rakhmerov | they are not tested well etc. | 03:47 |
rakhmerov | kong: yes, I find this feature very very demanded | 03:47 |
kong | especially for legacy software | 03:48 |
kong | for exsiting a lot of scripts, how to transfer them to mistral smoothly | 03:48 |
rakhmerov | I actually would like to get back to your patch and continue discussion | 03:48 |
rakhmerov | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/373606/ | 03:48 |
rakhmerov | yes, I agree fully | 03:48 |
rakhmerov | but maybe we need to be discuss it from a slightly different angle | 03:49 |
rakhmerov | in a more abstract form | 03:49 |
kong | yep | 03:49 |
rakhmerov | I mean the following: you're mostly talking about using a file system | 03:49 |
rakhmerov | which is fine | 03:49 |
kong | if there is another project could do FaaS thing, life will be much easier for mistral | 03:49 |
rakhmerov | but maybe we could make the idea more attractive if we were talking about an abstract external storage | 03:49 |
rakhmerov | yes | 03:50 |
kong | no, currenty, i'm thinking how to integerate with 3rd party to acheive the same goal | 03:50 |
kong | mistral can not do everything | 03:50 |
rakhmerov | so it shouldn't be only a file system probably, file system can be just a special case of it | 03:50 |
kong | agree | 03:50 |
rakhmerov | anyway, I'm going to re-review it from a different perspective | 03:51 |
rakhmerov | we may also discuss it on the PTG | 03:51 |
rakhmerov | let me actually restore it, let's keep it just as a WIP | 03:51 |
rakhmerov | for now | 03:51 |
rakhmerov | ok with that? | 03:52 |
kong | i think we could abandon that one, and start with a spec after discussion | 03:52 |
rakhmerov | ok | 03:52 |
kong | rakhmerov: need to pick up my son ;-) | 03:54 |
kong | what time for you now? | 03:54 |
rakhmerov | about 11 am | 03:57 |
rakhmerov | kong: ok, take care | 03:57 |
*** bobh has quit IRC | 04:06 | |
*** harlowja has joined #openstack-mistral | 06:34 | |
*** harlowja has quit IRC | 07:26 | |
*** tuan_ has joined #openstack-mistral | 07:40 | |
tuan_ | Hi guys, if you are online and have time, may i have sometime to discuss with you guys about the mysql problem yesterday | 07:42 |
tuan_ | ping me any time when you are online | 07:42 |
rakhmerov | tuan_: here | 07:53 |
tuan_ | Hi Renat, sorrry to wake you up | 07:53 |
tuan_ | :D | 07:53 |
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 08:03 | |
*** mgershen has joined #openstack-mistral | 08:05 | |
*** tuan_ has quit IRC | 08:17 | |
*** tuan has joined #openstack-mistral | 08:19 | |
rakhmerov | you didn't wake me up | 08:24 |
rakhmerov | it's 3.24 pm here | 08:25 |
rakhmerov | tuan: so, as far as that sqlalchemy question | 08:25 |
rakhmerov | why do you think it's an issue in sqlalchemy itself? | 08:25 |
d0ugal | so late :) | 08:25 |
tuan | :D | 08:25 |
* d0ugal is waking up | 08:25 | |
tuan | here is just 9h25 | 08:25 |
tuan | haha | 08:25 |
rakhmerov | my point of view: it has nothing to do with sqlalchemy | 08:25 |
d0ugal | tuan: 8:25here :) | 08:26 |
rakhmerov | it has something to do with how we organise DB operations | 08:26 |
tuan | :D | 08:26 |
rakhmerov | you're 100% right that we try to do everything in one big transaction | 08:26 |
tuan | well, i also do not think it is sqlalchemy | 08:26 |
rakhmerov | that's the real issue | 08:26 |
rakhmerov | not sqlalchemy I think | 08:26 |
rakhmerov | ok | 08:26 |
tuan | i have not seen this one before | 08:26 |
tuan | even i had quite a long time work sql | 08:26 |
tuan | however, | 08:27 |
rakhmerov | solutions I see: 1) Delete objects with smaller batches | 08:27 |
tuan | yeap as you said | 08:27 |
rakhmerov | 2) Make expiration policy do clean up more often | 08:27 |
tuan | i myself vote for 1 | 08:27 |
rakhmerov | #1 IMO is better (although doesn't conflict with #2) | 08:27 |
rakhmerov | yes | 08:27 |
tuan | yeap | 08:27 |
rakhmerov | but it should be implemented by someone | 08:28 |
tuan | do we want it to be configurable | 08:28 |
tuan | ? | 08:28 |
rakhmerov | it's not a big deal to do, we just need to define what size of batches we'll have and split one big transaction into this kind of batches | 08:28 |
rakhmerov | that's it | 08:28 |
rakhmerov | yes, we can make it configurable | 08:29 |
rakhmerov | it'd give us additional flexibility | 08:29 |
tuan | yeap, i agree | 08:29 |
tuan | :) | 08:29 |
tuan | so let me check my schedule | 08:29 |
tuan | i will pm you guys about fixing it if i have time | 08:29 |
tuan | i will confirm it in next couple of hours | 08:30 |
tuan | :) | 08:30 |
d0ugal | tuan: Have you opened a bug? | 08:30 |
tuan | not yet | 08:30 |
d0ugal | tuan: can I see the error? | 08:30 |
tuan | i am going to do it now | 08:30 |
rakhmerov | tuan: please open the bug for this | 08:30 |
tuan | yeap | 08:30 |
rakhmerov | it would be cool if someone from your colleagues volunteered | 08:30 |
tuan | i will do that | 08:31 |
tuan | :D | 08:31 |
tuan | but let me check my schedule first | 08:31 |
tuan | :) | 08:31 |
*** sharatss has quit IRC | 08:39 | |
*** sharatss has joined #openstack-mistral | 08:39 | |
*** jpich has joined #openstack-mistral | 08:49 | |
tuan | https://bugs.launchpad.net/mistral/+bug/1658946 | 09:40 |
openstack | Launchpad bug 1658946 in Mistral "DBExceptionError when trying to delete a huge number of executions " [Undecided,New] | 09:40 |
tuan | Here we go | 09:41 |
rakhmerov | ok | 09:46 |
*** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-mistral | 10:28 | |
openstackgerrit | Istvan Imre proposed openstack/mistral: Invalid jinja pattern regex corrected https://review.openstack.org/424566 | 10:28 |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/mistral-dashboard: Task table - type column would refer to workflow executions accordingly https://review.openstack.org/415631 | 10:48 |
*** shardy has joined #openstack-mistral | 11:05 | |
*** tuan has quit IRC | 12:02 | |
*** tuan_ has joined #openstack-mistral | 12:04 | |
*** shardy is now known as shardy_lunch | 12:11 | |
openstackgerrit | OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/mistral: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/424617 | 12:12 |
*** catintheroof has joined #openstack-mistral | 12:16 | |
openstackgerrit | luong tuan proposed openstack/mistral: Deleting the expired execution in chunk https://review.openstack.org/424621 | 12:19 |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/mistral: Invalid jinja pattern regex corrected https://review.openstack.org/424566 | 12:35 |
*** shardy_lunch is now known as shardy | 12:52 | |
*** bobh has joined #openstack-mistral | 13:09 | |
*** bobh has quit IRC | 13:09 | |
*** bobh has joined #openstack-mistral | 13:10 | |
*** AlexeyAbashkin has joined #openstack-mistral | 13:16 | |
*** thrash|g0ne is now known as thrash | 13:33 | |
openstackgerrit | luong tuan proposed openstack/mistral: Deleting the expired execution in chunk https://review.openstack.org/424621 | 13:54 |
*** dprince has joined #openstack-mistral | 13:59 | |
openstackgerrit | OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/mistral: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/424617 | 14:01 |
*** dprince has quit IRC | 15:05 | |
*** jaosorior has joined #openstack-mistral | 15:25 | |
*** dprince has joined #openstack-mistral | 15:55 | |
*** sharatss has quit IRC | 15:57 | |
*** sharatss has joined #openstack-mistral | 15:58 | |
*** dmellado has quit IRC | 16:07 | |
*** dmellado has joined #openstack-mistral | 16:48 | |
*** dmellado has quit IRC | 16:53 | |
*** dmellado has joined #openstack-mistral | 16:59 | |
*** bobh has quit IRC | 17:14 | |
*** thrash is now known as thrash|biab | 17:17 | |
*** tuan_ has quit IRC | 17:29 | |
*** jpich has quit IRC | 17:51 | |
*** dprince has quit IRC | 18:04 | |
*** bobh has joined #openstack-mistral | 18:08 | |
*** dprince has joined #openstack-mistral | 18:09 | |
*** dprince has quit IRC | 18:13 | |
*** dprince has joined #openstack-mistral | 18:20 | |
*** thrash|biab is now known as thrash | 18:36 | |
*** sharatss has quit IRC | 18:48 | |
*** sharatss has joined #openstack-mistral | 18:49 | |
*** shardy is now known as shardy_afk | 19:04 | |
*** harlowja has joined #openstack-mistral | 19:41 | |
*** bobh has quit IRC | 19:58 | |
*** thrash is now known as thrash|bbl | 20:07 | |
*** shardy_afk is now known as shardy | 21:27 | |
*** catintheroof has quit IRC | 21:35 | |
*** catintheroof has joined #openstack-mistral | 21:35 | |
*** catintheroof has quit IRC | 21:35 | |
*** thrash|bbl is now known as thrash | 22:03 | |
*** dprince has quit IRC | 22:37 | |
*** harlowja has quit IRC | 23:08 | |
*** jaosorior has quit IRC | 23:12 | |
*** harlowja has joined #openstack-mistral | 23:58 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!