| *** bobh has joined #openstack-mistral | 00:02 | |
| *** bobh has quit IRC | 00:09 | |
| *** bobh has joined #openstack-mistral | 00:12 | |
| *** bobh has quit IRC | 00:18 | |
| *** bobh has joined #openstack-mistral | 00:34 | |
| *** bobh has quit IRC | 00:36 | |
| *** bobh has joined #openstack-mistral | 00:36 | |
| *** bobh has quit IRC | 00:41 | |
| *** rrecio_ has quit IRC | 00:51 | |
| *** bobh has joined #openstack-mistral | 01:58 | |
| *** bobh has quit IRC | 02:29 | |
| *** bobh has joined #openstack-mistral | 03:13 | |
| *** bobh has quit IRC | 03:17 | |
| *** bobh has joined #openstack-mistral | 03:22 | |
| *** bobh has quit IRC | 03:41 | |
| *** bobh has joined #openstack-mistral | 03:46 | |
| *** bobh has quit IRC | 04:28 | |
| *** thrash|g0ne has quit IRC | 04:51 | |
| *** thrash has joined #openstack-mistral | 04:51 | |
| *** thrash has joined #openstack-mistral | 04:51 | |
| *** hparekh has joined #openstack-mistral | 04:52 | |
| *** jaosorior has joined #openstack-mistral | 06:14 | |
| rakhmerov | d0ugal: woow! | 06:23 |
|---|---|---|
| rakhmerov | what was that regression? | 06:23 |
| rakhmerov | before merging it let's please discuss it | 06:23 |
| rakhmerov | ^Gal^: you here? | 06:32 |
| rakhmerov | hi | 06:32 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/mistral-dashboard: Remove mox in test-requirement.txt https://review.openstack.org/397770 | 06:33 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/mistral-dashboard: Adding files to .gitignore https://review.openstack.org/397656 | 06:38 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/mistral-dashboard: Cleanup unused files https://review.openstack.org/397648 | 06:38 |
| *** jaosorior has quit IRC | 06:41 | |
| *** jaosorior has joined #openstack-mistral | 06:42 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/mistral-dashboard: mistral-dashboard: entities name change for system consistency https://review.openstack.org/397637 | 06:46 |
| rakhmerov | d0ugal, ddeja, hparekh: guys, could you please review a bunch of small patches? | 06:53 |
| rakhmerov | where I gave +2 | 06:53 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/python-mistralclient: Add cancelled state to action executions https://review.openstack.org/384700 | 07:10 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/python-mistralclient: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/398618 | 07:10 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/python-mistralclient: Remove unused pylint https://review.openstack.org/397642 | 07:10 |
| * ddeja grabs cup of tea and start reviewing | 07:19 | |
| ddeja | rakhmerov ^ | 07:19 |
| rakhmerov | ok! | 07:19 |
| rakhmerov | thank you | 07:19 |
| ddeja | rakhmerov: btw, small question: do you have some list of companies that uses Mistral on production which you can share? | 07:25 |
| rakhmerov | sharatss: hi, can you please read my comment on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/396763/ | 07:25 |
| rakhmerov | ddeja: honestly, I'm afraid that I don't know well at this point. I have some in my head but this list is not full obviously. This question was recently raised by some of my managers and I thought that we need to find out | 07:27 |
| rakhmerov | I'm thinking about creating something like a survey or at least take stats from PyPi (but we need to figure out how to filter out OpenStack CI downloads from it) | 07:29 |
| ddeja | rakhmerov: OK, thanks | 07:30 |
| rakhmerov | yeah, sorry | 07:30 |
| ddeja | no, no problem | 07:30 |
| rakhmerov | I need to know this better but I need to figure out how to gather this info | 07:30 |
| ddeja | just this crazy bug from last week | 07:31 |
| rakhmerov | yes | 07:31 |
| ddeja | with hanigng transactions on OVH production | 07:31 |
| rakhmerov | but you know, surprisingly we didn't come across this bug at Nokia | 07:31 |
| ddeja | and I started to wonder who else started to use mistral, but if there is no info, that's ok | 07:31 |
| rakhmerov | nobody noticed it, maybe because we don't make too many API calls | 07:32 |
| ddeja | that may be the case | 07:32 |
| rakhmerov | it's rather our workflows a big, and in the engine we didn't have this issue | 07:32 |
| rakhmerov | only when using REST API | 07:32 |
| ddeja | OK | 07:33 |
| rakhmerov | ddeja: you can count Nokia, StackStorm, TripleO, OVH (I don't know much about OVH though) | 07:33 |
| rakhmerov | maybe Huawei too, but I'm not 100% sure | 07:34 |
| rakhmerov | they wanted to use it | 07:34 |
| ddeja | oh, cool | 07:34 |
| rakhmerov | but through StackStorm there's a huge number of Mistral users | 07:34 |
| rakhmerov | I just don't have a full list | 07:34 |
| rakhmerov | but I know it includes companies like Symantec, Cisco etc. | 07:35 |
| rakhmerov | as far as that bug, this is actually my fault because I saw strange behavior in some of our unit tests before but didn't drill down to the root cause. In some of the tests if we made DB API call lazy loading still worked even outside of open transaction | 07:36 |
| ddeja | rakhmerov: and technical question: do you think failur of dsvm gate in this patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/397125/1 is related to the patch itself? | 07:37 |
| rakhmerov | I should have found a reason a while ago but postponed it | 07:37 |
| rakhmerov | let me see.. | 07:37 |
| ddeja | becouse in other recent patch we got all success | 07:37 |
| rakhmerov | no, I'm sure it's not related | 07:37 |
| rakhmerov | I know the reason of this failure | 07:37 |
| rakhmerov | gonna fix it | 07:38 |
| ddeja | oh, ok | 07:38 |
| ddeja | +2 +W then | 07:38 |
| rakhmerov | ok | 07:38 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/mistral-dashboard: Fixed action screen "run" button CSS issue https://review.openstack.org/398361 | 07:42 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/mistral-lib: Added the Options for Internationalization output in conf.py https://review.openstack.org/397675 | 07:42 |
| rakhmerov | ddeja: that failure has already been fixed actually. This patch was just checked earlier than we fixed this | 07:43 |
| ddeja | oh, ok | 07:45 |
| ddeja | rakhmerov: just found this https://github.com/Tesora/tesora-mistral It looks like we can add another complany to the list... | 07:57 |
| rakhmerov | what the.. | 07:58 |
| rakhmerov | :) | 07:58 |
| rakhmerov | ooh, it's a fork | 07:58 |
| rakhmerov | I see | 07:58 |
| sharatss | rakhmerov: yes i read it | 07:58 |
| rakhmerov | ddeja: yeah, I knew they were going to look at it but didn't know about any uses | 07:59 |
| sharatss | rakhmerov: i can take up the job of replacing MagicMock | 07:59 |
| rakhmerov | sharatss: sure, go ahead :) | 07:59 |
| sharatss | rakhmerov: thanks :) | 07:59 |
| rakhmerov | sharatss: are you ok to merge Winson's patch as is? | 07:59 |
| sharatss | rakhmerov: let it merge. As a part of my change i will replace it again | 08:00 |
| rakhmerov | ddeja: I had a couple of meetings with them about a year ago | 08:00 |
| rakhmerov | sharatss: ok, good | 08:00 |
| rakhmerov | sharatss: please remove your -1 then | 08:01 |
| sharatss | rakhmerov: done :) | 08:01 |
| ddeja | rakhmerov: ok, I see | 08:01 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/mistral: Replace retrying with tenacity https://review.openstack.org/398408 | 08:08 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/mistral: Added releasenote for Senlin Action Pack https://review.openstack.org/397592 | 08:08 |
| *** shardy_afk is now known as shardy | 08:15 | |
| openstackgerrit | Sharat Sharma proposed openstack/python-mistralclient: Removed the extra space from tox.ini https://review.openstack.org/397683 | 08:19 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/python-mistralclient: Added the reno for stable/mitaka stable/newton and stable/liberty https://review.openstack.org/397736 | 08:21 |
| *** mgershen has joined #openstack-mistral | 08:27 | |
| *** mgershen has quit IRC | 08:28 | |
| d0ugal | rakhmerov: hey | 08:43 |
| d0ugal | rakhmerov: The transaction patches broke mistral briefly. sharatss noticed it because devstack *is* voting on python-tripleoclient | 08:43 |
| rakhmerov | yes, I'm here | 08:44 |
| rakhmerov | just a sec | 08:44 |
| d0ugal | rakhmerov: there was an open patch to fix it, but we didn't make sure they merged at the same time | 08:44 |
| rakhmerov | you mean that test_action_execution[sanity] test? | 08:44 |
| rakhmerov | or something else? | 08:44 |
| rakhmerov | yes, I saw that too | 08:45 |
| d0ugal | I forget which one exactly | 08:45 |
| rakhmerov | it was fixed by another patch that xavierhardy sent | 08:45 |
| d0ugal | but simple things like "mistral workflow-list" failed | 08:45 |
| d0ugal | Yeah | 08:45 |
| rakhmerov | ooh, really? | 08:45 |
| rakhmerov | aaah, yes | 08:45 |
| rakhmerov | after only the first patch, yes | 08:45 |
| rakhmerov | indeed | 08:45 |
| rakhmerov | so, now it's ok, right? | 08:45 |
| d0ugal | Yeah, as far as I know | 08:46 |
| *** mgershen has joined #openstack-mistral | 08:46 | |
| d0ugal | but I think we should have the job voting, I don't see any reason why we wouldn't :) | 08:46 |
| xavierhardy | \o/ | 08:47 |
| xavierhardy | sorry, wrong window | 08:47 |
| rakhmerov | d0ugal: well, let me think.. There was a reason actually to make it non-voting | 08:47 |
| rakhmerov | e.g. some tests that were not stable enough (because of how they are designed) | 08:48 |
| rakhmerov | like the test for ssh_proxied action | 08:48 |
| rakhmerov | hm.. | 08:48 |
| rakhmerov | akuznetsova: hi Nastya, do you remember why we didn't want to make our devstack gate voting? | 08:49 |
| rakhmerov | d0ugal: actually, I want we to make it voting but I just wanna make sure it's ok | 08:49 |
| *** jpich has joined #openstack-mistral | 08:49 | |
| rakhmerov | d0ugal: I think I'm ok to make it voting. In case some of the unstable tests (those that fail due to their design itself) give us some consistent pain we can disable them for now till we fix them | 08:51 |
| rakhmerov | I don't want them to slow down our dev process | 08:51 |
| d0ugal | rakhmerov: we should try and make it more stable :) | 08:51 |
| rakhmerov | yes, I agree | 08:51 |
| d0ugal | rakhmerov: it is already voting on python-mistralclient - I don't see it being a problem htere | 08:52 |
| d0ugal | there | 08:52 |
| d0ugal | (except when we broke it recently) | 08:52 |
| rakhmerov | ddeja, hparekh, kong, akuznetsova: guys, maybe you have any objections? | 08:52 |
| rakhmerov | it's still kinda worrisome for me | 08:52 |
| d0ugal | haha, okay | 08:52 |
| d0ugal | we can always make it non-voting again if it is a problem and we are unable to fix it quickly | 08:52 |
| rakhmerov | on the client they are different | 08:52 |
| rakhmerov | yeah | 08:53 |
| rakhmerov | ok, if there's not any other objections let's do it | 08:53 |
| rakhmerov | courage is what will help us move forward :) | 08:53 |
| sharatss | rakhmerov: d0ugal i also insist on fixing py35 gate jobs on client | 08:53 |
| rakhmerov | it's high time we did it I guess | 08:53 |
| rakhmerov | sharatss: ok, we will | 08:54 |
| d0ugal | sharatss: makes sense | 08:54 |
| sharatss | rakhmerov: d0ugal i have a doubt | 08:54 |
| rakhmerov | about what? | 08:54 |
| sharatss | why was the openstack/common removed from all clients? any particular reasons for it? | 08:55 |
| rakhmerov | wasn't it you who did this? :) | 08:55 |
| rakhmerov | I thought it was you :) | 08:55 |
| sharatss | rakhmerov: definitely not :P | 08:55 |
| hparekh | d0ugal: rakhmerov Yeah tests are not stable and we shavr to make it stable but as of now IMHO it should be non-voting | 08:55 |
| rakhmerov | hm... ok | 08:56 |
| rakhmerov | sharatss: I guess it was because we just don't use openstack/common | 08:56 |
| rakhmerov | which is ok | 08:56 |
| hparekh | sharatss: May be pawnesh has done it | 08:56 |
| hparekh | I guess you know him | 08:57 |
| rakhmerov | hparekh: yeah, this is my concern too but as far as I remember there's only one really painful test (for action std.ssh_proxied) that fails pretty often | 08:57 |
| sharatss | hparekh: yes i do | 08:57 |
| rakhmerov | hparekh: recently I didn't see a lot of other failures actually | 08:57 |
| rakhmerov | sharatss: so what is your concern about openstack/common? | 08:58 |
| sharatss | hparekh: rakhmerov: the fix for py35 was within the common directory | 08:58 |
| rakhmerov | ooh | 08:58 |
| sharatss | rakhmerov: in cliutils.py | 08:58 |
| hparekh | rakhmerov: Yes right. I will look into this and submit a patch if I can find the reason | 08:58 |
| rakhmerov | pawnesh: ^ | 08:58 |
| rakhmerov | pawnesh: can you comment? | 08:58 |
| pawnesh | hparekh: i just removed client.py from openstack/common | 08:59 |
| rakhmerov | hparekh: thanks man, Nikolay actually looked at it but didn't figure out why it fails sometimes, maybe it's something with the test env itself (it's pretty hairy) | 08:59 |
| rakhmerov | hparekh: so, what's your opinion? Is it ok to make the gate voting and if that test turns to be too painful for us just disable it for now? | 09:00 |
| rakhmerov | and then fix it asap and enable back | 09:00 |
| rakhmerov | pawnesh, sharatss: guys, so what do we need to do? Revert cliutils.py back or what? | 09:01 |
| rakhmerov | sorry, I'm not too strong at that client side stuff | 09:01 |
| sharatss | rakhmerov: hparekh: if we want py35 as voting as of now its better to revert it | 09:01 |
| sharatss | rakhmerov: if we have time to fix it maybe we can fix it and make it to voting | 09:02 |
| hparekh | rakhmerov: How about all core reviewers check the tests failed in the gate and ignore if it is ssh_proxied one and if test is failing then we can investigate. Meanwhile I am looking into this test and try to make it more stable | 09:02 |
| rakhmerov | sharatss: yes, sure. My understanding is that we don't have too much urgency in making it voting. Do whatever you think is needed. Be sure to discuss with pawnesh since he made this change | 09:04 |
| sharatss | rakhmerov: sure i might need hparekh help | 09:05 |
| rakhmerov | hparekh: hm.. we can do it. I usually look at the tests, but you know, for that exact patch I forgot :) And everybody else did. Which led to a serious regression | 09:05 |
| rakhmerov | d0ugal: what do you think? | 09:05 |
| * d0ugal reads up | 09:05 | |
| d0ugal | sorry, I was getting coffee | 09:05 |
| rakhmerov | hparekh, d0ugal: how about the following? For now we keep it non-voting and hparekh is looking into how to make that test more stable? | 09:06 |
| hparekh | sharatss: Sure I will help you. Let me know | 09:06 |
| sharatss | hparekh: thanks :) | 09:06 |
| rakhmerov | with the promise that we'll be investigating every failure | 09:06 |
| d0ugal | rakhmerov: sure, or I can look into it | 09:06 |
| d0ugal | I do see one failure that looks invalid at the moment | 09:06 |
| rakhmerov | we can keep that patch in infra for not (w/o merging it) | 09:07 |
| rakhmerov | once we fix the test we can immediately merge the patch into infra | 09:07 |
| rakhmerov | d0ugal: which one? | 09:07 |
| *** jaosorior is now known as jaosorior_lunch | 09:08 | |
| d0ugal | rakhmerov: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/397761/ | 09:08 |
| d0ugal | http://logs.openstack.org/61/397761/2/check/gate-mistral-devstack-dsvm/68f012f/console.html#_2016-11-15_16_08_18_342176 | 09:08 |
| d0ugal | rakhmerov: acutally, ignore me | 09:08 |
| rakhmerov | d0ugal: I already looked at it, it's fixed | 09:08 |
| d0ugal | rakhmerov: that is the error from when we broken it recently | 09:08 |
| d0ugal | Yeah | 09:08 |
| rakhmerov | yes :) | 09:08 |
| * d0ugal is still waking up | 09:08 | |
| rakhmerov | haha :) | 09:08 |
| rakhmerov | have your coffee man! :)) | 09:09 |
| d0ugal | I am used to working with americans, you are all testing my brain about 4 hours earlier than normal | 09:09 |
| rakhmerov | np | 09:09 |
| rakhmerov | haha :)) | 09:09 |
| sharatss | rakhmerov: and you doubt me so much :( | 09:09 |
| rakhmerov | d0ugal: so, are you ok to hold on with making it voting? Hopefully, for just a few days | 09:10 |
| rakhmerov | sharatss: what do you mean? | 09:10 |
| sharatss | rakhmerov: u thought that i had removed the directory :P | 09:10 |
| rakhmerov | sorry, my fault | 09:10 |
| sharatss | rakhmerov: haha :D i was kidding | 09:11 |
| rakhmerov | I don't always remember who has done what | 09:11 |
| rakhmerov | :)) | 09:11 |
| d0ugal | rakhmerov: sure, I abandonded the change to be safe. I can restore it later. | 09:11 |
| rakhmerov | ok | 09:11 |
| rakhmerov | d0ugal, hparekh: I would prefer if we had some period within we need to make that test stable | 09:12 |
| rakhmerov | how about a week? | 09:12 |
| rakhmerov | say, if it's not done by the end of the next week we disable the test for now make the gate voting | 09:12 |
| hparekh | yeah sounds good | 09:13 |
| rakhmerov | I think it would be fair, otherwise it may take too long | 09:13 |
| d0ugal | sure, sounds good | 09:14 |
| *** DaveTurner has quit IRC | 09:14 | |
| d0ugal | I have never used tempest before, I'll have to look at how it works :) | 09:14 |
| * ddeja also thinks we can wait a week | 09:17 | |
| rakhmerov | d0ugal: not a rocket sience ) | 09:19 |
| rakhmerov | ddeja: ok! | 09:19 |
| d0ugal | sharatss: I was looking into the openstack/common being deleted. | 09:29 |
| d0ugal | sharatss: https://github.com/openstack/python-mistralclient/commit/b1614333eb8c3b14aa84b185e8d02aebe8da2a0d | 09:29 |
| d0ugal | sharatss: and https://github.com/openstack/python-mistralclient/commit/b3805b6d082fe59910c64f6a0852de53353b0504 | 09:29 |
| sharatss | d0ugal: same here | 09:29 |
| d0ugal | sharatss: oh, cool :) | 09:30 |
| d0ugal | sharatss: so it seems that we just moved away from it and everything left was deleted | 09:30 |
| d0ugal | sharatss: so I don't think it is an issue? | 09:30 |
| sharatss | d0ugal: i am trying a small change and running tox. let me see if py35 passes | 09:30 |
| *** testac3 has joined #openstack-mistral | 09:31 | |
| *** testac3 has left #openstack-mistral | 09:31 | |
| d0ugal | sharatss: cool :) | 09:31 |
| sharatss | d0ugal: maybe we can solve this with the existing code without reverting back anything | 09:31 |
| sharatss | :) | 09:31 |
| *** jaosorior_lunch is now known as jaosorior | 09:43 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 09:48 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-mistral | 09:49 | |
| d0ugal | sharatss: it looks like python35 is failing due to deprecation warnings | 09:49 |
| d0ugal | sharatss: but they don't come from anything we use | 09:50 |
| d0ugal | sharatss: I mean, they are caused by libraries we use, not mistral itself | 09:50 |
| d0ugal | so I think they need to be fixed in those packages? | 09:50 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/python-mistralclient: Removed the extra space from tox.ini https://review.openstack.org/397683 | 10:05 |
| *** shardy is now known as shardy_mtg | 10:16 | |
| openstackgerrit | Renat Akhmerov proposed openstack/mistral: Add timestamp at the bottom of every page https://review.openstack.org/397761 | 10:16 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/mistral: Migrated to the new oslo.db enginefacade https://review.openstack.org/397125 | 10:22 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/mistral: Use mock for a bad HTTP call in unit tests https://review.openstack.org/396763 | 10:22 |
| sharatss | d0ugal: yes. i dont think adding python warnings broke py35 right? | 10:43 |
| d0ugal | sharatss: You don't think they did? | 10:46 |
| d0ugal | I think they did | 10:47 |
| d0ugal | http://logs.openstack.org/83/397683/3/check/gate-python-mistralclient-python35-nv/547640c/console.html#_2016-11-17_08_23_04_601185 | 10:47 |
| d0ugal | For example ^ | 10:47 |
| sharatss | d0ugal: now i get a new error | 10:47 |
| d0ugal | That test checks that stderr is empty, but it isn't | 10:47 |
| d0ugal | and it isn't empty because of deprecation warnings, but they come from the stdlib in areas we don't use | 10:47 |
| d0ugal | but they are used by cliff | 10:47 |
| sharatss | d0ugal: shall i test by removing the deprecation warnings? | 10:48 |
| d0ugal | sharatss: If you like. | 10:49 |
| d0ugal | sharatss: I would guess that somebody is probably already working on fixing it in cliff | 10:49 |
| d0ugal | so maybe we should wait for that? | 10:49 |
| sharatss | d0ugal: but the tests are passing in other projects | 10:50 |
| sharatss | d0ugal: take a look at this now http://paste.openstack.org/show/589560/ | 10:50 |
| d0ugal | sharatss: oh, I didn't know that bit. Interesting. | 10:50 |
| sharatss | d0ugal: this is what i get after running tox now | 10:51 |
| d0ugal | sharatss: that is the same error that I linked in the logs ^ | 10:51 |
| sharatss | d0ugal: yes. AssertionError. err... | 10:52 |
| d0ugal | You run your tests as root! :-o | 10:53 |
| d0ugal | sharatss: a new version of cliff was tagged two days ago | 10:54 |
| sharatss | d0ugal: hmm.. so we will wait for the fix from cliff side? | 10:56 |
| d0ugal | sharatss: https://github.com/openstack/cliff/blob/master/cliff/commandmanager.py#L91 | 10:57 |
| d0ugal | That is where one deprecation warning comes from | 10:57 |
| d0ugal | and the other comes from here: https://github.com/openstack/cliff/blob/master/cliff/app.py#L387 | 10:58 |
| d0ugal | so I don't think it has been fixed in cliff. | 10:58 |
| d0ugal | Maybe other projects just ignore the deprecation warnings? or maybe they don't check for them? | 10:58 |
| *** shardy_mtg is now known as shardy | 11:00 | |
| sharatss | d0ugal: are you planning to propose it in cliff? | 11:04 |
| d0ugal | sharatss: no, no plans at the moment | 11:04 |
| * d0ugal is already wearing too many hats | 11:04 | |
| sharatss | d0ugal: haha :) ok i will see if i can | 11:05 |
| d0ugal | sharatss: I wonder if the new method is in python2 | 11:05 |
| d0ugal | I guess that might be why they have not changed it yet | 11:05 |
| sharatss | d0ugal: so what do you say? we will wait for them? | 11:06 |
| d0ugal | sharatss: Yeah, it is Python 3 only | 11:06 |
| d0ugal | sharatss: I guess there isn't an easy fix :) | 11:06 |
| d0ugal | sharatss: so either ignore the deprecation warnings, or update the test | 11:06 |
| *** khamtamtun has joined #openstack-mistral | 11:06 | |
| d0ugal | Checking for stderr is not very reliable because of possible warnings like this | 11:07 |
| sharatss | d0ugal: you are right. I checked in projects that are passing 35 | 11:08 |
| sharatss | d0ugal: they are ignoring deprecation warnings | 11:08 |
| d0ugal | sharatss: cool, then we should do that :) | 11:08 |
| sharatss | d0ugal: checking.. | 11:10 |
| openstackgerrit | Sharat Sharma proposed openstack/python-mistralclient: Removing deprecation warnings to pass py35 https://review.openstack.org/398931 | 11:11 |
| sharatss | d0ugal: ^ | 11:11 |
| *** khamtamtun has quit IRC | 11:12 | |
| d0ugal | sharatss: cool, looks good - we shall see if that helps with py35 :) | 11:13 |
| sharatss | d0ugal: i think it should | 11:13 |
| d0ugal | It seems most projects just ignore them all, I thought they might just ignore specific warnings | 11:13 |
| d0ugal | Yeah, I am running it locally to see. | 11:13 |
| d0ugal | I guess I am impatient | 11:14 |
| sharatss | d0ugal: please check it | 11:14 |
| *** kamtamtun has joined #openstack-mistral | 11:14 | |
| d0ugal | sharatss: passed for me | 11:20 |
| sharatss | d0ugal: what's taking jenkins so long? :)) | 11:21 |
| d0ugal | sharatss: tripleo | 11:21 |
| d0ugal | :) | 11:21 |
| d0ugal | actually, no, tripleo doesn't CI against mistralclient | 11:21 |
| sharatss | d0ugal: ok. will wait for it to pass | 11:22 |
| d0ugal | sharatss: it is passing | 11:23 |
| d0ugal | sharatss: just waiting for devstack, the others passed | 11:23 |
| sharatss | d0ugal: hmm... | 11:24 |
| d0ugal | devstack is the slowest :) | 11:24 |
| sharatss | d0ugal: it wont fail anyway. so we are safe :) | 11:26 |
| *** hparekh has quit IRC | 11:27 | |
| *** sharatss has quit IRC | 11:31 | |
| *** sharatss has joined #openstack-mistral | 11:32 | |
| *** kamtamtun has quit IRC | 11:45 | |
| *** kamtamtun has joined #openstack-mistral | 11:52 | |
| *** kamtamtun has quit IRC | 11:53 | |
| *** kamtamtun has joined #openstack-mistral | 12:04 | |
| *** kamtamtun has quit IRC | 12:05 | |
| *** catintheroof has joined #openstack-mistral | 12:46 | |
| *** sharatss has quit IRC | 12:57 | |
| *** sharatss has joined #openstack-mistral | 12:57 | |
| *** chlong has joined #openstack-mistral | 13:00 | |
| *** bobh has joined #openstack-mistral | 13:01 | |
| *** bobh has quit IRC | 13:01 | |
| *** bobh has joined #openstack-mistral | 13:01 | |
| *** thrash is now known as thrash|g0ne | 13:06 | |
| *** sharatss has quit IRC | 14:18 | |
| *** sharatss has joined #openstack-mistral | 14:19 | |
| *** bobh has quit IRC | 14:20 | |
| *** jaosorior has quit IRC | 14:41 | |
| *** mgershen1 has joined #openstack-mistral | 14:45 | |
| *** mgershen has quit IRC | 14:47 | |
| *** mgershen1 has quit IRC | 15:00 | |
| openstackgerrit | OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/mistral: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/399052 | 15:01 |
| *** mgershen has joined #openstack-mistral | 15:02 | |
| *** janki has joined #openstack-mistral | 15:22 | |
| *** bobh has joined #openstack-mistral | 15:55 | |
| openstackgerrit | Michal Gershenzon proposed openstack/mistral-specs: Yaql Tasks Function https://review.openstack.org/394194 | 16:24 |
| openstackgerrit | Michal Gershenzon proposed openstack/mistral-specs: Yaql Tasks Function https://review.openstack.org/394194 | 16:28 |
| *** rrecio has joined #openstack-mistral | 16:32 | |
| *** rrecio_ has joined #openstack-mistral | 16:36 | |
| *** rrecio has quit IRC | 16:36 | |
| *** janki has quit IRC | 17:04 | |
| *** DaveTurner has joined #openstack-mistral | 17:47 | |
| *** jpich has quit IRC | 18:47 | |
| *** shardy has quit IRC | 18:57 | |
| *** rbrady is now known as rbrady-afk | 19:28 | |
| *** gyee has joined #openstack-mistral | 19:38 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 19:48 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-mistral | 19:49 | |
| *** rbrady-afk is now known as rbrady | 20:12 | |
| *** bobh has quit IRC | 20:44 | |
| *** bobh has joined #openstack-mistral | 20:46 | |
| *** bobh has quit IRC | 20:51 | |
| *** rrecio_ has quit IRC | 21:31 | |
| *** jamielennox is now known as jamielennox|away | 21:40 | |
| *** rrecio has joined #openstack-mistral | 21:56 | |
| *** jamielennox|away is now known as jamielennox | 22:24 | |
| *** pawnesh has quit IRC | 23:17 | |
| *** catintheroof has quit IRC | 23:29 | |
| *** catintheroof has joined #openstack-mistral | 23:30 | |
| *** catintheroof has quit IRC | 23:35 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!