Wednesday, 2013-10-09

*** julim has quit IRC00:05
*** shardy has quit IRC00:11
*** fandikurnia01 has quit IRC00:13
*** matsuhashi has joined #openstack-metering00:30
*** __nikhil__ has joined #openstack-metering00:49
*** changbl has joined #openstack-metering00:51
*** fandikurnia01 has joined #openstack-metering01:02
*** shakayumi has joined #openstack-metering01:21
*** gordc has joined #openstack-metering01:30
*** fnaval_ has joined #openstack-metering01:48
*** ryanpetrello has joined #openstack-metering01:52
*** evanjfraser has quit IRC01:59
*** peterinfra has quit IRC02:13
*** shakayumi has quit IRC02:28
*** ryanpetrello has quit IRC02:33
*** ryanpetrello has joined #openstack-metering02:35
*** openstack has joined #openstack-metering03:23
*** hobana.freenode.net sets mode: +ns 03:23
*** shakayumi has joined #openstack-metering03:26
*** hobana.freenode.net sets mode: -o openstack03:29
-hobana.freenode.net- *** Notice -- TS for #openstack-metering changed from 1381289023 to 133533757403:29
*** hobana.freenode.net sets mode: +ct-s 03:29
*** changbl has joined #openstack-metering03:29
*** chmouel_ has joined #openstack-metering03:29
*** jd__ has joined #openstack-metering03:29
*** ryanpetrello has joined #openstack-metering03:29
*** fnaval_ has joined #openstack-metering03:29
*** fandikurnia01 has joined #openstack-metering03:29
*** __nikhil__ has joined #openstack-metering03:29
*** matsuhashi has joined #openstack-metering03:29
*** Shaan7 has joined #openstack-metering03:29
*** sdake_ has joined #openstack-metering03:29
*** giroro_ has joined #openstack-metering03:29
*** taplax has joined #openstack-metering03:29
*** nijaba_ has joined #openstack-metering03:29
*** lsmola has joined #openstack-metering03:29
*** flwang has joined #openstack-metering03:29
*** sdake has joined #openstack-metering03:29
*** janisg has joined #openstack-metering03:29
*** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-metering03:29
*** sileht has joined #openstack-metering03:29
*** sgran has joined #openstack-metering03:29
*** harmw has joined #openstack-metering03:29
*** briancline has joined #openstack-metering03:29
*** asalkeld has joined #openstack-metering03:29
*** Joy has joined #openstack-metering03:29
*** aspiers has joined #openstack-metering03:29
*** krtaylor has joined #openstack-metering03:29
*** yjiang5_ has joined #openstack-metering03:29
*** ityaptin has joined #openstack-metering03:29
*** llu_away has joined #openstack-metering03:29
*** raghuvrao has joined #openstack-metering03:29
*** EmilienM has joined #openstack-metering03:29
*** Guest74104 has joined #openstack-metering03:29
*** annegentle_ has joined #openstack-metering03:29
*** clouded_tux has joined #openstack-metering03:29
*** vvechkanov has joined #openstack-metering03:29
*** ekarlso has joined #openstack-metering03:29
*** zigo_ has joined #openstack-metering03:29
*** tasdomas has joined #openstack-metering03:29
*** dhellmann has joined #openstack-metering03:29
*** bogdando has joined #openstack-metering03:29
*** dah has joined #openstack-metering03:29
*** apmelton has joined #openstack-metering03:29
*** dragondm has joined #openstack-metering03:29
*** Daviey has joined #openstack-metering03:29
*** lakspace has joined #openstack-metering03:29
*** jburkhart has joined #openstack-metering03:29
*** Ranzpirat has joined #openstack-metering03:29
*** fc__ has joined #openstack-metering03:29
*** swann has joined #openstack-metering03:29
*** sbadia has joined #openstack-metering03:29
*** hobana.freenode.net changes topic to "Project: https://launchpad.net/ceilometer | Meetings on Wed or Thu see Agenda: http://wiki.openstack.org/Meetings/MeteringAgenda | Blueprint: http://wiki.openstack.org/EfficientMetering"03:29
fandikurnia01ok doen04:08
*** shakayumi has quit IRC04:24
*** boris-42 has joined #openstack-metering05:03
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-metering05:27
*** Shaan7 has quit IRC05:48
*** fandikurnia01 has quit IRC05:49
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC06:02
openstackgerritJenkins proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Imported Translations from Transifex  https://review.openstack.org/4968006:03
*** eglynn has joined #openstack-metering06:14
*** ryanpetrello has quit IRC06:14
*** neumerance has joined #openstack-metering06:22
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-metering06:25
*** ityaptin_ has joined #openstack-metering06:26
*** ityaptin has quit IRC06:26
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC06:37
*** fandikurnia01 has joined #openstack-metering06:46
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-metering06:46
*** clouded_tux has quit IRC06:52
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC06:53
openstackgerritHaomeng,Wang proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Set python-six minimum version  https://review.openstack.org/5053806:53
*** clouded_tux has joined #openstack-metering06:54
*** yfujioka has joined #openstack-metering06:56
*** neumerance_ has joined #openstack-metering06:57
*** neumerance has quit IRC06:57
openstackgerritHaomeng,Wang proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Set python-six minimum version  https://review.openstack.org/5053807:04
*** Shaan7 has joined #openstack-metering07:05
*** eglynn has quit IRC07:15
openstackgerritHaomeng,Wang proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Set python-six minimum version  https://review.openstack.org/5053807:25
openstackgerritStephen Gran proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: New metric for instance state  https://review.openstack.org/5054607:37
*** shardy has joined #openstack-metering07:37
*** sdake has quit IRC07:45
*** sdake_ has quit IRC07:45
*** eglynn has joined #openstack-metering08:02
*** boris-42 has quit IRC08:06
*** bogdando has quit IRC08:22
*** sdake has joined #openstack-metering08:23
*** sdake has quit IRC08:23
*** sdake has joined #openstack-metering08:23
*** bogdando has joined #openstack-metering08:25
openstackgerritStephen Gran proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: New metric for instance state  https://review.openstack.org/5054608:35
*** sdake has quit IRC08:36
*** sdake has joined #openstack-metering08:43
*** sdake has quit IRC08:49
sgranjd__: hi09:04
jd__sgran: hi09:04
sgranI'm confused.  Why should that be a @staticmethod ?  None of the others are09:04
sgranin https://review.openstack.org/5054609:05
sgranI'm happy to do it if you prefer it that way, but I was trying to keep to the idiom already present09:06
*** sdake has joined #openstack-metering09:09
*** Bada has joined #openstack-metering09:15
*** Bada has quit IRC09:20
*** Shaan7 has quit IRC09:25
*** sdake has quit IRC09:25
*** sdake has joined #openstack-metering09:27
*** sdake has joined #openstack-metering09:27
*** sdake has quit IRC09:35
*** sdake has joined #openstack-metering09:36
*** Shaan7 has joined #openstack-metering09:40
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-metering09:41
*** sdake has quit IRC09:41
*** sdake has joined #openstack-metering10:11
*** sdake has quit IRC10:11
*** sdake has joined #openstack-metering10:11
*** neumerance_ has quit IRC10:14
*** lsmola has quit IRC10:25
*** lsmola has joined #openstack-metering10:37
*** ityaptin_ has quit IRC10:40
*** boris-42 has joined #openstack-metering10:55
*** fandikurnia01 has quit IRC11:07
*** zul has joined #openstack-metering11:14
*** Bada has joined #openstack-metering11:30
*** Bada has quit IRC11:35
openstackgerritChristian Berendt proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: six has to be in version 1.4.0 or higher  https://review.openstack.org/5060211:51
eglynnsileht, jd__: I've been playing a little with the alarm threshold validation in the api layer and a couple things surprised me12:01
eglynnmainly that we're validating the rule *twice*12:02
eglynnonce on the incoming param validation12:02
eglynnthen again on when the newly created alarm is init'd from the DB model for the response12:02
eglynnnot necessarily a huge issue except that there's the potential to *modify* rule query as a side-effect of the validation12:03
eglynnseems wrong to do a possibly mutating validation step *after* the thing has been created12:03
eglynn(i.e. too late to modify at that stage anyway)12:03
eglynnseems better to separate out into (a) pure non-mutating validation and (b) modification ...12:04
eglynn(a) would then called as a side-effect of the WSME validate decorator12:04
eglynn(b) could be called explicitly inline12:04
eglynnsileht, jd__: any thoughts on that ^^^?12:05
jd__eglynn: agreed12:05
eglynn(context is figuring out how to cleanly avoid the leakage of admin-ness from alarms created by admin on behalf of a non-admin)12:05
eglynnjd__: cool12:05
jd__I think this kind of problems comes from the fact WSME does not always do the job correctly12:05
jd__actually I'm working on that as we speak12:06
silehteglynn, yes I have already think about this, this due of usage of __init__ of wsme BaseType12:06
jd__trying to make WSME work :]12:06
eglynnyeah, it seems odd to have mix of implicit and explicit validation12:06
* sileht try to find the wsme issue about this12:06
eglynncool12:06
jd__basically @wsme.validate should not be used, as it does nothing anyway with pecan12:10
jd__and wsexpose should do the job12:10
jd__at least this is what I'm trying to make work for a couple of days now :)12:10
silehteglynn, https://bugs.launchpad.net/wsme/+bug/122090612:11
*** Bada has joined #openstack-metering12:11
eglynnjd__: are you thinking RC2 or Icehouse for your WIP changes?12:11
sgranwhen someone has a moment, I'm hoping to get https://review.openstack.org/#/c/50351/ and https://review.openstack.org/#/c/50546/ merged12:11
jd__eglynn: Icehouse12:12
eglynnjd__: fair nuffski12:12
jd__we don't have a RC2 windows because we don't have enough bugs12:12
sgranI can make more :)12:12
jd__s/enough/important enough/12:12
silehteglynn, we have think with jd__ that we can just add a static method (Alarm.from_db) to build Alarm API object like wsme does to bypass validation when the alarm come from the database12:13
jd__yeah I think dhellmann wrote about that too somewhere12:13
eglynnsileht: a-ha, cool, yeah that would work I think12:13
*** Bada has quit IRC12:16
*** gordc has joined #openstack-metering12:23
*** sandywalsh has joined #openstack-metering12:30
openstackgerritVladislav Kuzmin proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Replace tests.base part7  https://review.openstack.org/5061312:43
openstackgerritVladislav Kuzmin proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Replace tests.base part4  https://review.openstack.org/4714512:43
openstackgerritVladislav Kuzmin proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Replace tests.base part3  https://review.openstack.org/4714412:43
openstackgerritVladislav Kuzmin proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Replace tests.base part6  https://review.openstack.org/4714712:43
openstackgerritVladislav Kuzmin proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Replace tests.base part5  https://review.openstack.org/4714612:43
openstackgerritVladislav Kuzmin proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Update oslo in ceilometer part1  https://review.openstack.org/4647612:43
openstackgerritVladislav Kuzmin proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Replace tests.base part1  https://review.openstack.org/4648012:43
openstackgerritVladislav Kuzmin proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Replace tests.base part2  https://review.openstack.org/4714312:43
openstackgerritVladislav Kuzmin proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Update oslo in ceilometer part2  https://review.openstack.org/4714212:43
jd__dhellmann: ah I'm pleased to see you did the same remark as me on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/44652/ :)12:43
*** bpokorny has joined #openstack-metering12:45
*** Bada has joined #openstack-metering12:53
*** julim has joined #openstack-metering12:54
*** BadaBoum has joined #openstack-metering12:56
*** eglynn is now known as eglynn-lunch12:57
*** Bada has quit IRC12:58
*** anteaya has joined #openstack-metering13:01
*** thomasm has joined #openstack-metering13:02
*** eglynn-lunch has quit IRC13:02
thomasmHey all13:03
*** BadaBoum has quit IRC13:05
*** Bada has joined #openstack-metering13:05
*** fandikurnia01 has joined #openstack-metering13:07
*** jergerber has joined #openstack-metering13:08
*** Shaan7 has quit IRC13:10
*** fandikurnia01 has quit IRC13:14
*** ryanpetrello has joined #openstack-metering13:14
*** pwiltsey has joined #openstack-metering13:16
*** pwiltsey has quit IRC13:17
*** pwiltsey has joined #openstack-metering13:18
*** changbl has quit IRC13:21
dhellmannjd__: yeah, that function's existence bothers me13:24
gordcdhellmann: since i have your partial attention, do you remember what bug stopped us from continuing with alembic migration scripts?13:27
dhellmanngordc: I'm not sure if we ever filed a bug. There were issues running the alembic migrations in unit tests, iirc.13:28
silehtgordc, perhaps this one https://bugs.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+bug/121715613:29
*** matsuhashi has quit IRC13:30
*** yfujioka has quit IRC13:30
*** matsuhashi has joined #openstack-metering13:30
gordccool cool. just asking because we have this https://review.openstack.org/#/c/45064/ (in sql-migrate) which fixes resource table, but the patch to fix meter table was done in alembic...13:31
*** krtaylor has quit IRC13:32
silehtgordc, the issue affect only sqlite, so, but we really need to do some thing for this issue because continue to use both is very dangerous for future db migration13:33
silehteach time we add a new sqlachemy script, this one is played before the alembic one, this is not very good13:34
gordcsileht: agreed. i'm already confused.13:34
*** matsuhashi has quit IRC13:34
*** fnaval_ has quit IRC13:40
*** dafter has joined #openstack-metering13:40
*** fnaval_ has joined #openstack-metering13:40
*** eglynn-lunch has joined #openstack-metering13:44
*** fnaval_ has quit IRC13:45
*** fandikurnia01 has joined #openstack-metering13:47
*** Shaan7 has joined #openstack-metering14:00
*** fandikurnia01 has quit IRC14:08
*** fnaval_ has joined #openstack-metering14:10
*** Bada has quit IRC14:13
sandywalshso, I've started working on this: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/host-metric-hook which should be a low-impact hook to getting hypervisor samples from Nova. Good application of the UDP service.14:20
sandywalsheglynn-lunch: heat should benefit from it too ^14:20
sandywalsh(the spec has more detail)14:21
*** eglynn-lunch is now known as eglynn14:21
eglynnsandywalsh: cool14:21
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC14:30
*** changbl has joined #openstack-metering14:34
*** julim has quit IRC14:35
*** julim has joined #openstack-metering14:40
*** sdake_ has joined #openstack-metering14:47
*** sdake_ has joined #openstack-metering14:47
*** sdake has quit IRC14:47
*** Shaan7 has quit IRC14:54
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-metering15:06
*** krtaylor has joined #openstack-metering15:12
*** changbl has quit IRC15:17
*** terriyu has joined #openstack-metering15:27
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC15:34
*** gordc1 has joined #openstack-metering15:41
*** gordc has quit IRC15:42
*** gordc1 has quit IRC15:43
*** gordc has joined #openstack-metering15:43
*** lsmola has quit IRC15:46
thomasmHey, eglynn: It looks like gate is passing the SQLAlchemy timestamp ordering backport: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/48039/15:53
thomasm=]15:53
thomasmIf you want to take a look15:53
*** giroro_ has quit IRC16:01
*** boris-42 has quit IRC16:01
*** boris-42 has joined #openstack-metering16:02
*** Ruetobas has joined #openstack-metering16:03
*** anteaya has quit IRC16:07
*** Ruetobas has quit IRC16:08
*** Ruetobas has joined #openstack-metering16:14
*** pwiltsey has quit IRC16:20
*** boris-42 has quit IRC16:23
*** boris-42 has joined #openstack-metering16:23
openstackgerritStephen Gran proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: New metric for instance state  https://review.openstack.org/5054616:45
*** chmouel_ is now known as chmouel16:51
*** boris-42 has quit IRC16:54
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-metering16:54
*** boris-42 has joined #openstack-metering16:55
*** boris-42 has quit IRC16:58
*** litong has joined #openstack-metering17:21
*** dafter has quit IRC17:23
*** tvb|afk has joined #openstack-metering17:25
*** tvb|afk has quit IRC17:27
*** tvb|afk has joined #openstack-metering17:27
openstackgerritStephen Gran proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: New metric for instance state  https://review.openstack.org/5054617:37
*** tvb|afk has quit IRC17:37
*** dafter has joined #openstack-metering17:38
*** dafter has quit IRC17:38
*** dafter has joined #openstack-metering17:38
*** tvb|afk has joined #openstack-metering17:40
*** tvb|afk has quit IRC17:40
*** tvb|afk has joined #openstack-metering17:40
*** dafter has quit IRC17:42
*** thomasm has quit IRC17:43
*** boris-42 has joined #openstack-metering17:58
*** thomasm has joined #openstack-metering18:03
litong@eglynn, eoghan, ping.18:03
thomasmback18:03
eglynnlitong: 'sup?18:03
*** thomasm has quit IRC18:04
litong@eglynn, looking at the alarm/service.py and trying to get a handle on how alarm component works.18:04
eglynnk18:05
litongnoticed that class AlarmService extensions_namespace is "celiometer.alarm.evaluator"18:05
*** thomasm has joined #openstack-metering18:05
eglynnyep18:05
litongI am a bit puzzled by that. why the name space for alarm service being set to evaluator?18:05
eglynnbecause the evaluators are loaded as stevedore extensions18:06
litongI thought notifier and evaluator should be in different namespace.18:06
eglynn(there are two separate evaluators, one for threshold-oriented alarms and another for combination alarms)18:06
litong@eglynn, is there an overall doc somewhere that I can read to see how they work at a higher level?18:08
eglynnmeh, that's not good: https://github.com/openstack/ceilometer/blob/master/setup.cfg#L10618:08
eglynnlitong: not really, as yet18:08
litongboth notifier and evaluator loaded based on extensions, right? one is ceilometer.alarm.notifier, the other is ceilometer.alarm.evaluator?18:08
litongI have both services enabled when set up devstack. but I have trouble to see how they actually get invoked and working.18:09
litonghow do I see it in action in devstack?18:09
litongfrom rabbitmq management console, I can see the queues for alarm, but I am not seeing anything going on on the queue. such as this one18:10
litongceilometer.alarm.alarm_notifier18:11
eglynnlitong: create an alarm with a loging notification action, see it fire, watch the alarm-notifier logging output18:11
litong@eglynn, ok, good to know there is a way, how do I do that?18:12
eglynnlitong: example alarm creation command line right at the end of this WIP quickstart guide  http://openstack.redhat.com/CeilometerQuickStart18:12
litongceilometer client?18:13
litongok, using the ceilometer client. all right. let me try that. Thanks @eglynn.18:13
eglynnlitong: sure, python-ceilometerclient18:13
eglynnsileht: are we missing the line ...18:15
eglynncombination = ceilometer.alarm.evaluator.combination:CombinationEvaluator18:15
eglynnfrom: https://github.com/openstack/ceilometer/blob/master/setup.cfg#L10618:15
eglynnsileht: or how is combo evaluator loaded?18:15
*** Shaan7 has joined #openstack-metering18:23
*** Shaan7 has quit IRC18:23
*** Shaan7 has joined #openstack-metering18:24
*** Shaan7 has quit IRC18:24
*** Shaan7 has joined #openstack-metering18:24
*** Shaan7 has quit IRC18:26
*** Shaan7 has joined #openstack-metering18:27
*** Shaan7 has quit IRC18:30
*** Shaan7 has joined #openstack-metering18:30
openstackgerritEoghan Glynn proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Avoid leaking admin-ness into threshold-oriented alarms  https://review.openstack.org/5070818:36
*** Shaan7 has quit IRC18:44
*** Shaan7 has joined #openstack-metering18:45
*** Shaan7 has quit IRC18:45
*** Shaan7 has joined #openstack-metering18:47
*** Shaan7 has quit IRC18:48
*** Shaan7 has joined #openstack-metering18:48
openstackgerritEoghan Glynn proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Ensure combination alarm evaluator can be loaded  https://review.openstack.org/5071018:51
sgrandoes anyone have a minute to double check me?18:54
sgranthe end goal of what I'm trying to do is have ceilometer collect a metric, and poke heat if it meets an alarm condition18:54
sgranthe metric I'm collecting is 'instance_state' as returned by libvirt - an enum from 0 to 8, and some string states18:55
sgranI'm returning (I think) the numeric value as the value of the metric, and the string state in extra data.  If someone has a moment, a set of eyeballs from someone who is more sure of this than I am would be appreciated18:56
sgranthis is https://review.openstack.org/#/c/50546/18:56
sgranI haven't yet made the alarm condition for heat, so that will be my next task :)18:56
openstackgerritEoghan Glynn proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Ensure combination alarms can be evaluated  https://review.openstack.org/5071419:07
*** Shaan7 has quit IRC19:11
*** Shaan7 has joined #openstack-metering19:11
eglynnjd__: looks like we're gonna need an RC219:12
eglynn(IMHO at least)19:12
eglynnunless I've completely misunderstood what's going on, the combination alarm feature is broken without https://review.openstack.org/50710 & https://review.openstack.org/5071419:13
eglynnjd__: adding the to-RC2-or-not-to-RC2 question as an agenda topic for discussion at our team meeting shortly19:20
openstackgerritEoghan Glynn proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Avoid leaking admin-ness into threshold-oriented alarms  https://review.openstack.org/5070819:28
*** lsmola has joined #openstack-metering19:32
*** sdake has joined #openstack-metering19:37
litong@eglynn, eoghan, what triggers an evaluator?19:43
eglynnlitong: do you mean what caused the evaluator to trigger an alarm?19:45
eglynnlitong: or what causes the evaluator to do an evaluation?19:45
litong@eglynn, eoghan, I mean what makes an evaluator's evaluate being invoked?19:45
litong@eglynn, eoghan, the later.19:45
eglynnlitong: it's a periodic task19:45
litong@eglynn, periodically. ok, I see.19:46
litongno wonder there is an interval.19:46
eglynnlitong: see https://github.com/openstack/ceilometer/blob/master/ceilometer/alarm/service.py#L12919:46
eglynnlitong: and https://github.com/openstack/ceilometer/blob/master/ceilometer/alarm/service.py#L18319:47
litong@eglynn, eoghan, yeah, making sense now. That is where I was lost, I sort of figured out how the notifers work. but did not get how evaulators work.19:48
eglynnlitong: cool :)19:48
litong@eglynn, I think I am quite clear now. I thought evaluators work differently (like in a pipeline which filter through all the meters)19:48
litongso that only meters triggers the evaluator (not a periodic task).19:49
litongfor example, threshold evaulator will remember how many some kind of meters it sees , when it reaches certain limit, it post something to the alarm queue.19:50
eglynnlitong: the intention of not doing in-line evaluation like that was to allow for "widely dimensioned" alarms (e.g. alarms based on metrics aggregated across a group of instances)19:52
eglynnbbiab19:52
litong@eglynn, yes, makes sense. did not think about the aggregated.19:52
*** sdake_ has quit IRC19:58
*** sdake has quit IRC19:58
*** sdake has joined #openstack-metering20:00
*** sdake has quit IRC20:00
*** sdake has joined #openstack-metering20:00
*** JerryM has joined #openstack-metering20:02
*** sdake has quit IRC20:05
*** sdake has joined #openstack-metering20:09
sandywalshlitong: I like your line of thinking ;)20:13
litong@sandywalsh, thanks.20:14
litong@sandywalsh, doing that, we do not need the alarm_evaluator server, but it can only handle the data through metering recording flow. it can resolve the aggregated data if these data come in as samples as well.20:16
litong@sandywalsh, but current design works as well.20:17
*** raghuvrao has quit IRC20:17
*** raghuvrao has joined #openstack-metering20:18
*** raghuvrao has joined #openstack-metering20:18
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC20:21
sandywalshlitong: exactly, the evaluator service should disappear in that case. The event trigger stuff that dragondm is working on will handle the temporal cases.20:22
litong@sandysalsh, are you saying we are in the process of getting rid of the evaluator services?20:23
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-metering20:23
sandywalshlitong: no, but it's a suggestion. This is still a WIP (addressing the wide dimension use case next) https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Ceilometer/AlarmImprovements20:24
sandywalshlitong: look forward to your feedback (will open it up to the ML once I get the existing feedback integrated)20:24
litong@sandywalsh, oh, ok. will do that. thanks.20:25
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC20:25
*** litong has quit IRC20:33
*** boris-42 has quit IRC20:45
*** boris-42 has joined #openstack-metering20:47
*** sandywalsh has quit IRC20:55
*** sandywalsh has joined #openstack-metering20:57
*** evanjfraser has joined #openstack-metering21:00
*** shardy is now known as shardy_afk21:09
*** egallen has joined #openstack-metering21:11
*** tvb|afk has quit IRC22:05
*** dafter has joined #openstack-metering22:06
*** dafter has quit IRC22:10
*** gordc has quit IRC22:12
*** eglynn has quit IRC22:13
*** jergerber has quit IRC22:13
*** bpokorny has quit IRC22:13
*** ryanpetrello has quit IRC22:23
*** thomasm has quit IRC22:37
*** sdake_ has joined #openstack-metering22:40
*** sdake_ has joined #openstack-metering22:40
openstackgerritA change was merged to openstack/ceilometer: Ensure combination alarm evaluator can be loaded  https://review.openstack.org/5071022:45
*** fnaval_ has quit IRC22:47
*** julim has quit IRC22:48
*** evanjfraser has quit IRC22:57
*** egallen has quit IRC22:58
*** dafter has joined #openstack-metering23:16
*** gordc has joined #openstack-metering23:18
*** dafter has quit IRC23:21
*** gordc has quit IRC23:33
*** JerryM has left #openstack-metering23:38
*** yfujioka has joined #openstack-metering23:52

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!