*** catintheroof has quit IRC | 00:29 | |
*** chlong has quit IRC | 00:59 | |
openstackgerrit | Pony Chou proposed openstack/manila: Add QNAP Manila Driver https://review.openstack.org/394703 | 01:38 |
---|---|---|
*** tuanluong has joined #openstack-manila | 01:46 | |
openstackgerrit | zhongjun proposed openstack/manila: Trivial fix LOG.exception issues https://review.openstack.org/412688 | 01:56 |
*** gouthamr has quit IRC | 02:10 | |
*** gcb has quit IRC | 02:30 | |
openstackgerrit | Ha Van Tu proposed openstack/manila: Fix typo in rootwrap.conf https://review.openstack.org/412702 | 02:31 |
*** gcb has joined #openstack-manila | 02:50 | |
openstackgerrit | gengchc2 proposed openstack/manila: use six.StringIO for compatibility with io.StringIO in python3 https://review.openstack.org/412723 | 03:21 |
openstackgerrit | zhongjun proposed openstack/manila: Enable IPv6 in manila(network plugins and drivers) https://review.openstack.org/406776 | 03:23 |
openstackgerrit | zhongjun proposed openstack/manila: Add the ability to check the tenant quota in detail https://review.openstack.org/366614 | 03:48 |
*** senk has joined #openstack-manila | 05:27 | |
*** yankee has joined #openstack-manila | 05:39 | |
*** yankee has quit IRC | 05:40 | |
openstackgerrit | Pony Chou proposed openstack/manila: Add QNAP Manila Driver https://review.openstack.org/394703 | 05:52 |
*** senk has quit IRC | 05:59 | |
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-manila | 06:37 | |
*** dsariel has joined #openstack-manila | 06:38 | |
*** xinyanzhang has joined #openstack-manila | 06:43 | |
*** dsariel has quit IRC | 07:30 | |
*** lpetrut has quit IRC | 07:32 | |
*** nherciu has joined #openstack-manila | 08:06 | |
openstackgerrit | Pony Chou proposed openstack/manila: Add QNAP Manila Driver https://review.openstack.org/394703 | 08:14 |
*** rraja has joined #openstack-manila | 08:16 | |
*** pcaruana has joined #openstack-manila | 08:19 | |
*** dsariel has joined #openstack-manila | 08:51 | |
openstackgerrit | yunfeng zhou proposed openstack/puppet-manila: add CONTRIBUTING.rst https://review.openstack.org/412918 | 08:58 |
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-manila | 09:03 | |
*** lpetrut has quit IRC | 09:09 | |
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-manila | 09:09 | |
*** a-pugachev has joined #openstack-manila | 09:15 | |
tommylikehu | ping vponomaryov | 09:17 |
*** lpetrut1 has joined #openstack-manila | 09:43 | |
*** lpetrut has quit IRC | 09:43 | |
*** lpetrut1 is now known as lpetrut | 09:43 | |
*** lpetrut has quit IRC | 09:48 | |
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-manila | 09:56 | |
*** ganso has joined #openstack-manila | 09:57 | |
openstackgerrit | Ha Van Tu proposed openstack/manila: Fix typo in rootwrap.conf https://review.openstack.org/412702 | 10:07 |
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC | 10:17 | |
*** surabujin has joined #openstack-manila | 10:19 | |
*** senk has joined #openstack-manila | 10:35 | |
vponomaryov | tommylikehu: pong | 10:37 |
*** gcb has quit IRC | 10:59 | |
*** senk has quit IRC | 11:00 | |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/manila: GPFS CES: Fix bugs related to access rules not found https://review.openstack.org/411010 | 11:00 |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/manila: [TrivialFix] Move share type filter tempest to test_scheduler_stats.py https://review.openstack.org/409641 | 11:01 |
*** igajsin has joined #openstack-manila | 11:01 | |
*** dsariel has quit IRC | 11:07 | |
*** igajsin has quit IRC | 11:17 | |
*** alyson_ has joined #openstack-manila | 11:21 | |
openstackgerrit | Tom Barron proposed openstack/manila: WIP: Remove nova net from service_instance https://review.openstack.org/410449 | 11:23 |
*** akapil has joined #openstack-manila | 11:27 | |
*** igajsin has joined #openstack-manila | 11:33 | |
*** akapil has quit IRC | 11:37 | |
*** akapil has joined #openstack-manila | 11:38 | |
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-manila | 11:53 | |
*** tuanluong has quit IRC | 11:58 | |
*** akapil has quit IRC | 12:04 | |
*** akapil has joined #openstack-manila | 12:04 | |
*** senk has joined #openstack-manila | 12:06 | |
*** senk has quit IRC | 12:08 | |
openstackgerrit | Valeriy Ponomaryov proposed openstack/manila: [DNM] debug 3.0 https://review.openstack.org/410366 | 12:12 |
*** catintheroof has joined #openstack-manila | 12:37 | |
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC | 12:43 | |
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-manila | 12:43 | |
*** lseki has joined #openstack-manila | 12:43 | |
*** dsariel has joined #openstack-manila | 12:47 | |
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC | 12:48 | |
openstackgerrit | Valeriy Ponomaryov proposed openstack/python-manilaclient: [DNM] Test share group client changes https://review.openstack.org/412587 | 12:49 |
*** chlong has joined #openstack-manila | 12:53 | |
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-manila | 12:54 | |
*** gouthamr has joined #openstack-manila | 12:55 | |
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC | 12:59 | |
*** pcaruana has quit IRC | 13:01 | |
*** pcaruana has joined #openstack-manila | 13:06 | |
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-manila | 13:09 | |
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC | 13:14 | |
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-manila | 13:24 | |
*** akapil has quit IRC | 13:32 | |
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC | 13:38 | |
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-manila | 13:38 | |
*** akapil has joined #openstack-manila | 13:44 | |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/manila: Fix typo in rootwrap.conf https://review.openstack.org/412702 | 13:49 |
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC | 13:50 | |
*** catinthe_ has joined #openstack-manila | 14:06 | |
*** mtanino has quit IRC | 14:08 | |
*** senk has joined #openstack-manila | 14:08 | |
*** catintheroof has quit IRC | 14:08 | |
*** chlong has quit IRC | 14:16 | |
*** surabujin has quit IRC | 14:20 | |
*** cknight has joined #openstack-manila | 14:22 | |
*** pcaruana has quit IRC | 14:23 | |
*** cknight1 has joined #openstack-manila | 14:25 | |
*** cknight has quit IRC | 14:26 | |
*** surabujin has joined #openstack-manila | 14:33 | |
*** dustins has joined #openstack-manila | 14:35 | |
*** xyang_ has joined #openstack-manila | 14:36 | |
*** pcaruana has joined #openstack-manila | 14:37 | |
*** senk has quit IRC | 14:37 | |
*** eharney has quit IRC | 14:43 | |
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-manila | 14:47 | |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/manila: use six.StringIO for compatibility with io.StringIO in python3 https://review.openstack.org/412723 | 14:50 |
*** cknight1 has left #openstack-manila | 15:03 | |
*** eharney has joined #openstack-manila | 15:04 | |
*** eharney has quit IRC | 15:12 | |
dustins | bswartz: ping | 15:13 |
dustins | about PTG stuff | 15:13 |
*** jcsp has quit IRC | 15:19 | |
*** jcsp has joined #openstack-manila | 15:19 | |
openstackgerrit | zhongjun proposed openstack/manila: Trivial fix LOG.exception issues https://review.openstack.org/412688 | 15:23 |
*** dustins_ has joined #openstack-manila | 15:30 | |
*** dustins has quit IRC | 15:32 | |
*** mtanino has joined #openstack-manila | 15:32 | |
*** eharney has joined #openstack-manila | 15:34 | |
*** dustins_ is now known as dustins | 15:34 | |
bswartz | dustins: yes? | 15:35 |
*** xyang_ has quit IRC | 15:35 | |
dustins | bswartz: Heya, what do you think the over/under is for the PTG meetings going into Friday? | 15:35 |
bswartz | dustins: we've already said manila will be wed/thurs only | 15:36 |
tommylikehu_ | bswartz: could you take some time on this patch: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/406776/ | 15:36 |
dustins | bswartz: So Thursday is the hard stop? | 15:36 |
dustins | No chance of going into Friday? | 15:36 |
bswartz | dustins: I personally plan to jump over to cinder on Friday | 15:36 |
bswartz | tommylikehu_: you've got some -1s | 15:37 |
dustins | bswartz: Okay, cool, just trying to see when I need to head out of Atlanta and wanted to see if there was a possibility of it going long | 15:37 |
bswartz | tommylikehu_: anything specific you want me to focus on? | 15:37 |
dustins | bswartz: Thanks! | 15:37 |
tommylikehu_ | yes and I also want some feedback from you with which I can fix them all next morning :) | 15:39 |
*** xyang_ has joined #openstack-manila | 15:39 | |
*** akapil has quit IRC | 15:41 | |
*** a-pugachev has quit IRC | 15:42 | |
*** xyang_ has quit IRC | 15:43 | |
*** akapil has joined #openstack-manila | 15:45 | |
*** senk has joined #openstack-manila | 15:46 | |
*** harlowja has joined #openstack-manila | 15:49 | |
*** lseki has quit IRC | 15:50 | |
*** chlong has joined #openstack-manila | 15:53 | |
*** xyang_ has joined #openstack-manila | 15:55 | |
*** tommylikehu_ has quit IRC | 15:56 | |
*** akapil has quit IRC | 15:58 | |
*** rraja is now known as rraja|afk | 15:59 | |
*** chlong has quit IRC | 16:01 | |
openstackgerrit | Vitaliy Levitski proposed openstack/manila: Add MapR-FS native driver https://review.openstack.org/350035 | 16:01 |
*** akapil has joined #openstack-manila | 16:02 | |
*** xyang_ has quit IRC | 16:03 | |
*** xyang_ has joined #openstack-manila | 16:11 | |
*** chlong has joined #openstack-manila | 16:17 | |
*** tommylikehu_ has joined #openstack-manila | 16:24 | |
*** senk has quit IRC | 16:26 | |
*** chlong has quit IRC | 16:28 | |
*** xyang_ has quit IRC | 16:29 | |
*** xyang_ has joined #openstack-manila | 16:34 | |
*** catintheroof has joined #openstack-manila | 16:39 | |
*** catinthe_ has quit IRC | 16:42 | |
*** harlowja has quit IRC | 16:42 | |
*** chlong has joined #openstack-manila | 16:42 | |
ganso | bswartz, gouthamr, vponomaryov, toabctl, tbarron, markstur: Hello folks. Could you please review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/406305/ when you have some review time? Thanks in advance | 16:51 |
bswartz | ganso: ack, but my review queue is getting pretty deep | 16:51 |
ganso | bswartz: ok | 16:55 |
*** akapil has quit IRC | 16:58 | |
*** dustins_ has joined #openstack-manila | 17:16 | |
*** eharney has quit IRC | 17:17 | |
*** eharney has joined #openstack-manila | 17:18 | |
*** lpetrut has quit IRC | 17:18 | |
*** dustins has quit IRC | 17:19 | |
*** porrua has quit IRC | 17:24 | |
*** eharney has quit IRC | 17:24 | |
*** eharney has joined #openstack-manila | 17:38 | |
*** nherciu has quit IRC | 17:51 | |
*** harlowja has joined #openstack-manila | 17:53 | |
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-manila | 17:54 | |
*** pcaruana has quit IRC | 17:59 | |
*** lpetrut has quit IRC | 18:00 | |
*** catinthe_ has joined #openstack-manila | 18:03 | |
*** catintheroof has quit IRC | 18:06 | |
*** xyang_ has quit IRC | 18:07 | |
*** nherciu has joined #openstack-manila | 18:09 | |
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-manila | 18:12 | |
*** xyang_ has joined #openstack-manila | 18:16 | |
ganso | bswartz, gouthamr: ping | 18:20 |
gouthamr | ganso: pong | 18:20 |
gouthamr | bswartz | 18:20 |
bswartz | pong | 18:20 |
bswartz | I was just rereading https://review.openstack.org/#/c/321213/ | 18:20 |
ganso | bswartz: I would like to talk about mountable snapshots | 18:20 |
bswartz | http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/manila-specs/specs/ocata/mountable-snapshots.html | 18:21 |
*** xyang_ has quit IRC | 18:21 | |
bswartz | ganso: gouthamr mentioned there is a problem with the access rules driver interface in that spec | 18:22 |
*** porrua has joined #openstack-manila | 18:22 | |
bswartz | it looks like we missed this in spec review (or at least I did) | 18:22 |
ganso | bswartz: it uses the old allow/deny approach | 18:22 |
ganso | bswartz: it does not use update_access | 18:22 |
ganso | bswartz: I talked to tpsilva back then | 18:23 |
*** xyang_ has joined #openstack-manila | 18:23 | |
ganso | bswartz: his motivation was that, back then in Newton the update_access was filled with race conditions and problems | 18:23 |
ganso | bswartz: so he wanted to have it the old way | 18:23 |
ganso | bswartz: as it was simpler and worked before update_access was introduced | 18:24 |
bswartz | ganso: well if we did it the old way we'd have to update it eventually to match the new way | 18:24 |
openstackgerrit | Vitaliy Levitski proposed openstack/manila: Add MapR-FS native driver https://review.openstack.org/350035 | 18:24 |
bswartz | and if we did that we'd end up with a mess similar to what we have now with driver not switching to the new interface fast enough | 18:25 |
ganso | bswartz: since it is a driver interface, it would not touch the API, as we did not touch the API when transitioning share rules to update_access | 18:25 |
ganso | bswartz: yes, very painful mess | 18:25 |
gouthamr | ganso: update_access affected the way instances work... if you have instances created in a deferred manner, allow/deny does not scale. | 18:25 |
bswartz | ganso: yes the _most_ important thing is that the REST API remains stable | 18:25 |
bswartz | however significant driver interface changes are also pretty bad | 18:25 |
bswartz | and should be avoided | 18:25 |
bswartz | given that, my personal feeling is that we should update the spec to match the newer access rule driver interface | 18:26 |
bswartz | and I'm wondering if anyone feels that's the wrong thing to do | 18:26 |
ganso | bswartz: first, is there any motivation accept the old approach? | 18:27 |
ganso | bswartz: like, I would go for that, we if do not have plans to change to update_access later | 18:28 |
ganso | <bswartz> ganso: well if we did it the old way we'd have to update it eventually to match the new way | 18:28 |
ganso | bswartz: why exactly we would have to update? | 18:28 |
bswartz | ganso: I don't like the old approach for all of the same reasons we changed the access rules interface to being with | 18:28 |
gouthamr | ganso: one case: assume you have a snapshot, and you have to create a new snapshot instance, how do you update rules on this new instance? | 18:29 |
bswartz | it's a fundamentally fragile way for the manager to interact with the backend | 18:29 |
bswartz | if all you can do is allow and deny, then there's no way to do error recovery | 18:29 |
bswartz | or even to validate that the current access rules are correct | 18:29 |
ganso | gouthamr: you duplicate the ShareSnapshotInstanceAccessMappings and apply them | 18:29 |
gouthamr | ganso: yep.. applying them could be one step: "update_access" or a loop over "allow_access" | 18:30 |
ganso | gouthamr: yes | 18:30 |
bswartz | also, the allow/deny interface doesn't support pushing multiple changes atomically | 18:30 |
ganso | bswartz: this time we would only have read-only access rules | 18:30 |
ganso | bswartz: it is simpler | 18:30 |
ganso | bswartz: yes, we would not support that with the old approach, only one at a time | 18:30 |
ganso | bswartz: it would be very limited | 18:31 |
ganso | bswartz: my question is: do we want to stay limited? that was another of tpsilva's arguments | 18:31 |
*** xyang_ has quit IRC | 18:31 | |
ganso | bswartz: I told him the same thing and he said he designed the feature for special cases like, the admin wants to add an access rule to retrieve a file or something | 18:32 |
bswartz | ganso: that's the use case, but the design can support a lot more than that -- and that's the problem | 18:32 |
gouthamr | ganso: this feature is tenant-facing... atleast that's what the spec says.. | 18:32 |
ganso | bswartz: the way he envisioned the feature was to not let the mountable_snapshot access rules be used like share access rules | 18:32 |
bswartz | if we allow for multiple access rules to be added, and we allow for rules to be removed, then we need to ensure those command actually work | 18:33 |
ganso | bswartz: I don't agree with him, but we have a spec merged according to this design and we are too close to FF now | 18:33 |
bswartz | a different design would be to have exactly 1 access rule per snapshot | 18:33 |
bswartz | that would be simpler and cover the use case you mentioned above | 18:33 |
bswartz | however I feel that would be too limiting | 18:34 |
ganso | bswartz: yes, so we should re-imagine what we want mountable snapshots to be | 18:35 |
ganso | bswartz: decide to live with a more limited feature and never allow it to expand because it will be alot of work | 18:35 |
bswartz | well the spec says end users have complete freedom to add delete unlimited rules | 18:35 |
bswartz | I didn't think that would be too much work, honestly | 18:36 |
ganso | bswartz: or add a more sophisticated and complex mechanism that is bound to have the same problems as the share access rules (which will be sorted out when share access rules are sorted out as well) | 18:36 |
bswartz | I though the code could share a lot with the share access control code | 18:36 |
ganso | bswartz: in that case we could change the spec to be more limiting, or to change to the new approach | 18:36 |
ganso | bswartz: I think it is hard to share code, at this moment | 18:37 |
ganso | bswartz: that would be possible if we let the access rules refactor sink in first | 18:37 |
bswartz | is the reason we perceive it to be a lot of work because it depends on the unfinished access rules work? | 18:37 |
ganso | bswartz: yes, that as well | 18:37 |
ganso | bswartz: the mountable snapshots would have to come 1 release later | 18:37 |
bswartz | okay so what if we decide to do that? was there urgency to get the mountable snapshots feature in? | 18:38 |
gouthamr | ganso: hmmm, don't think so.. how about implementing an "update_snapshot_access" method and RPC and then worrying about any improvements later? | 18:38 |
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC | 18:39 | |
ganso | gouthamr: bswartz is suggesting that the share access rules and snapshot access rules should converge. I agree with him, because else we would have to maintain 2 different code branches that do similar things | 18:39 |
gouthamr | ganso: i mean wrt the additional state transitions and all that.. though i don't see why just applying the access rules design will not work over there from the beginning | 18:39 |
gouthamr | converge where? driver interface? | 18:40 |
bswartz | yes ganso -- copy/paste would give us correct behavior perhaps but the maintenance would be ugly -- long term it's best to simply share code for share/snapshot access control | 18:40 |
ganso | gouthamr: at the access rule helper | 18:41 |
ganso | gouthamr: driver interface will also be similar, but not the same | 18:41 |
ganso | gouthamr: looking at your access rule refactor code, do you feel like creating a more generic version of it that supports snapshot access rules in ocata timeframe? | 18:42 |
ganso | bswartz, gouthamr: I think that's the correct way to go, but we don't have much time | 18:43 |
bswartz | ganso: that's why I asked about the urgency | 18:44 |
bswartz | if we make it depend on gouthamr's access rules changes then we have to accept that it's likely to slip into pike | 18:44 |
bswartz | even assume gouthamr can get the access rules change done in ocata -- they might come too late | 18:44 |
gouthamr | yes. i don't want to hold up tpsilva on that - spread too thin to prioritize this work so far. | 18:45 |
ganso | bswartz: which day is the last day we will be accepting new code? | 18:46 |
gouthamr | however, the design's already up there in the spec. i don't mind some code duplication for the time being | 18:46 |
bswartz | R-4 is feature freeze, so R-6 will be feature proposal freeze | 18:46 |
ganso | bswartz: so I will have 1 week after returning from vacation to get it done | 18:47 |
gouthamr | ganso: the alternate proposal is to let this merge but have no drivers except LVM support it right away and merge a fix for this in Pike? | 18:50 |
ganso | bswartz: I will return from vacation Jan 4th | 18:50 |
ganso | bswartz: my vacation starts this Saturday | 18:50 |
bswartz | ganso: the problem goes away if we slip this feature to pike -- I'm trying to understand if that's a problem or not | 18:51 |
bswartz | yes my vacation starts saturday too, and I'll get back Jan 3rd | 18:51 |
ganso | gouthamr: HNAS driver would be merging in as well, I would be going through the pain of re-implementing the interface changes in Pike | 18:51 |
ganso | bswartz: sorry I return from vacation Jan 5th, not 4th | 18:51 |
ganso | gouthamr: but that is ok | 18:52 |
gouthamr | ganso: yes, i suppose that's the pain to take for iterative development of this feature anyway.. | 18:52 |
ganso | gouthamr: only LVM and HNAS | 18:52 |
ganso | gouthamr: if more drivers want to implement that in Ocata, that would be more complicated | 18:52 |
ganso | bswartz, gouthamr: ok let's summarize what we have decided | 18:54 |
gouthamr | ganso: i wish we can merge with LVM, HNAS is up to you... but we could discuss this in the weekly meeting and let them know it's not completely ready | 18:54 |
gouthamr | ganso: we're hoping to finish the impl in Pike | 18:54 |
ganso | bswartz, gouthamr: 1) we want it with update_access. 2) we can have duplicated code and fix/converge it later if it has problems, what is more important is the driver interface and API | 18:54 |
gouthamr | bswartz would call this an "experimental feature" instead of an experimental API | 18:55 |
bswartz | ganso: yes I agree with 1 and 2 | 18:55 |
bswartz | gouthamr: what? | 18:55 |
ganso | gouthamr: I think there is no such term "experimental feature" right now | 18:55 |
gouthamr | ^ i'm making that up | 18:55 |
ganso | gouthamr: once a feature is in with driver interfaces, it is open to vendors to implement | 18:55 |
ganso | gouthamr: there is no way to say "don't implement it, it is experimental" | 18:56 |
ganso | gouthamr: because there will already be at least 1 driver supporting | 18:56 |
*** chlong has quit IRC | 18:56 | |
gouthamr | ganso: hmmm, agree. 1) and 2) are fine by me too' | 18:57 |
ganso | bswartz, gouthamr: changing the implementation in Pike would cause all drivers to depend on the driver interface change, which would drag things towards Pike's FF | 18:57 |
ganso | bswartz, gouthamr: so, we need at least driver interface and API using update_access now in Ocata | 18:58 |
ganso | bswartz, gouthamr: whatever is in the middle can be improved in Pike | 18:58 |
ganso | bswartz, gouthamr: scratch what I said about update_access in API, it is allow/deny in API | 18:58 |
ganso | bswartz, gouthamr: what I meant is that we need it consolidated | 18:59 |
bswartz | ganso: the other option is to not merge anything until pike, but your proposal works too | 18:59 |
gouthamr | +1 | 18:59 |
ganso | bswartz, gouthamr: ok, let's do the following, I will code all I can until Jan 12th | 19:00 |
*** rraja|afk is now known as rraja | 19:00 | |
ganso | bswartz, gouthamr: but I won't prioritize a spec update that should be agreed before coding, the changes will be in the code | 19:00 |
*** martyt has joined #openstack-manila | 19:00 | |
*** martyt has quit IRC | 19:00 | |
ganso | bswartz, gouthamr: if I cannot get it done in time, it will slip to Pike | 19:01 |
ganso | bswartz, gouthamr: and it will not depend on goutham's patch directly | 19:01 |
*** martyt has joined #openstack-manila | 19:02 | |
ganso | bswartz, gouthamr: ok? | 19:02 |
gouthamr | ganso: yep, works | 19:02 |
bswartz | ganso: why not update the spec? | 19:02 |
bswartz | you're concerned it will take too long, or you're concerned more changes will come? | 19:02 |
ganso | bswartz: I will update the spec, but not a requirement to be done before FF | 19:02 |
ganso | bswartz: maybe after Jan 12th | 19:02 |
bswartz | personally I'd like to see the spec updated first, but I won't demand it | 19:03 |
bswartz | I think the reviewers screwed up here (including me) | 19:03 |
ganso | bswartz: someone else in my team has just started working on manila-ui | 19:04 |
ganso | bswartz: I was going to start working on that, but now I will do this access rules refactor with my vacation in between | 19:04 |
*** xyang_ has joined #openstack-manila | 19:04 | |
ganso | bswartz: so there are lots of things that I consider more important to finish and wrap up before updating the spec, as the code must be ready Jan 12th | 19:05 |
*** martyt has quit IRC | 19:06 | |
openstackgerrit | Valeriy Ponomaryov proposed openstack/manila: [DNM] debug 3.0 https://review.openstack.org/410366 | 19:12 |
*** chlong has joined #openstack-manila | 19:13 | |
openstackgerrit | Valeriy Ponomaryov proposed openstack/manila: [DNM] debug 3.0 https://review.openstack.org/410366 | 19:15 |
*** martyt has joined #openstack-manila | 19:17 | |
*** dsariel has quit IRC | 19:20 | |
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-manila | 19:22 | |
*** xyang_ has quit IRC | 19:28 | |
*** gouthamr has quit IRC | 19:29 | |
*** rraja has quit IRC | 19:35 | |
*** harlowja has quit IRC | 19:35 | |
*** catintheroof has joined #openstack-manila | 19:37 | |
*** catinthe_ has quit IRC | 19:40 | |
*** martyt has quit IRC | 19:45 | |
*** xyang_ has joined #openstack-manila | 19:48 | |
*** gouthamr has joined #openstack-manila | 19:50 | |
*** a-pugachev has joined #openstack-manila | 20:01 | |
*** dsariel has joined #openstack-manila | 20:03 | |
*** chlong has quit IRC | 20:15 | |
*** breitz has quit IRC | 20:20 | |
*** a-pugachev has quit IRC | 20:27 | |
*** chlong has joined #openstack-manila | 20:27 | |
*** dsariel has quit IRC | 20:28 | |
*** cknight1 has joined #openstack-manila | 20:36 | |
*** lpetrut has quit IRC | 20:36 | |
cknight1 | ganso: ping | 20:36 |
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-manila | 20:37 | |
*** dsariel has joined #openstack-manila | 20:41 | |
*** porrua has quit IRC | 20:47 | |
*** catintheroof has quit IRC | 20:47 | |
*** martyt has joined #openstack-manila | 20:51 | |
openstackgerrit | Clinton Knight proposed openstack/manila: Add create_share_from_snapshot_support extra spec https://review.openstack.org/356682 | 20:52 |
*** dsariel has quit IRC | 20:55 | |
*** martyt has quit IRC | 20:56 | |
*** breitz has joined #openstack-manila | 20:59 | |
openstackgerrit | Vitaliy Levitski proposed openstack/manila: Add MapR-FS native driver https://review.openstack.org/350035 | 21:01 |
*** alyson_ has quit IRC | 21:06 | |
*** gouthamr has quit IRC | 21:09 | |
*** lpetrut has quit IRC | 21:11 | |
*** xyang_ has quit IRC | 21:12 | |
*** mtanino has quit IRC | 21:13 | |
*** breitz has quit IRC | 21:21 | |
*** breitz_ has joined #openstack-manila | 21:21 | |
*** sage__ has joined #openstack-manila | 21:35 | |
*** nherciu has quit IRC | 21:36 | |
openstackgerrit | Mark Sturdevant proposed openstack/manila: GPFS KNFS: Do not reuse ssh prefix in loop https://review.openstack.org/413239 | 21:37 |
*** chlong has quit IRC | 21:46 | |
*** akapil has joined #openstack-manila | 21:49 | |
*** akapil has quit IRC | 21:54 | |
*** cknight1 has quit IRC | 21:54 | |
*** xyang_ has joined #openstack-manila | 22:08 | |
*** xyang_ has quit IRC | 22:09 | |
*** gouthamr has joined #openstack-manila | 22:13 | |
*** xyang_ has joined #openstack-manila | 22:16 | |
*** eharney has quit IRC | 22:21 | |
*** mtanino has joined #openstack-manila | 22:21 | |
*** xyang_ has quit IRC | 22:29 | |
*** mtanino has quit IRC | 22:29 | |
*** chlong has joined #openstack-manila | 22:57 | |
*** dustins_ has quit IRC | 22:59 | |
*** tommylikehu_ has quit IRC | 23:07 | |
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC | 23:24 | |
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-manila | 23:28 | |
*** mtanino has joined #openstack-manila | 23:34 | |
openstackgerrit | Goutham Pacha Ravi proposed openstack/manila: Add create_share_from_snapshot_support extra spec https://review.openstack.org/356682 | 23:48 |
*** ganso has quit IRC | 23:53 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!