| *** oomichi has quit IRC | 00:19 | |
| *** oomichi has joined #openstack-lbaas | 00:23 | |
| *** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-lbaas | 00:29 | |
| *** bzhao has quit IRC | 00:31 | |
| *** bzhao has joined #openstack-lbaas | 00:32 | |
| *** catintheroof has joined #openstack-lbaas | 00:35 | |
| *** gongysh has joined #openstack-lbaas | 01:01 | |
| *** amotoki has joined #openstack-lbaas | 01:08 | |
| *** reedip has quit IRC | 01:12 | |
| *** amotoki has quit IRC | 01:14 | |
| openstackgerrit | Ji Chengke proposed openstack/octavia master: change genconfig output-file path https://review.openstack.org/449902 | 01:17 |
|---|---|---|
| *** xgerman has quit IRC | 01:25 | |
| *** nakul_d has quit IRC | 01:25 | |
| *** ipsecguy has quit IRC | 01:25 | |
| *** xgerman has joined #openstack-lbaas | 01:27 | |
| *** ipsecguy has joined #openstack-lbaas | 01:27 | |
| *** nakul_d has joined #openstack-lbaas | 01:27 | |
| *** ducttape_ has quit IRC | 01:30 | |
| *** gongysh has quit IRC | 01:34 | |
| *** catintheroof has quit IRC | 01:41 | |
| *** sanfern has quit IRC | 01:51 | |
| *** reedip has joined #openstack-lbaas | 02:00 | |
| *** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-lbaas | 02:12 | |
| *** ducttape_ has quit IRC | 02:27 | |
| *** oomichi has quit IRC | 02:28 | |
| *** oomichi has joined #openstack-lbaas | 02:32 | |
| *** oomichi has quit IRC | 02:39 | |
| *** oomichi has joined #openstack-lbaas | 02:42 | |
| *** gongysh has joined #openstack-lbaas | 02:43 | |
| *** blogan has quit IRC | 02:50 | |
| *** mjblack has quit IRC | 03:08 | |
| *** aojea has joined #openstack-lbaas | 03:13 | |
| *** fnaval has joined #openstack-lbaas | 03:17 | |
| *** aojea has quit IRC | 03:18 | |
| *** mjblack has joined #openstack-lbaas | 03:26 | |
| *** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-lbaas | 03:27 | |
| *** ducttape_ has quit IRC | 03:32 | |
| *** links has joined #openstack-lbaas | 03:36 | |
| *** sanfern has joined #openstack-lbaas | 03:40 | |
| *** ajo has quit IRC | 03:50 | |
| *** ajo has joined #openstack-lbaas | 03:54 | |
| *** armax has quit IRC | 04:03 | |
| *** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-lbaas | 04:28 | |
| *** ducttape_ has quit IRC | 04:29 | |
| *** MarkMielke has quit IRC | 04:35 | |
| *** gcheresh_ has joined #openstack-lbaas | 05:16 | |
| *** aojea has joined #openstack-lbaas | 05:26 | |
| *** aojea has quit IRC | 05:27 | |
| *** aojea has joined #openstack-lbaas | 05:28 | |
| *** aojea has quit IRC | 05:32 | |
| *** rcernin has joined #openstack-lbaas | 05:38 | |
| *** aojea has joined #openstack-lbaas | 05:52 | |
| *** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-lbaas | 05:58 | |
| *** ducttape_ has quit IRC | 06:03 | |
| *** aojea has quit IRC | 06:03 | |
| *** bzhao has quit IRC | 06:27 | |
| *** bzhao has joined #openstack-lbaas | 06:28 | |
| *** oomichi has quit IRC | 06:48 | |
| *** oomichi has joined #openstack-lbaas | 06:52 | |
| *** amotoki has joined #openstack-lbaas | 07:13 | |
| *** pcaruana has joined #openstack-lbaas | 07:13 | |
| *** aojea has joined #openstack-lbaas | 07:17 | |
| *** tesseract has joined #openstack-lbaas | 07:18 | |
| *** amotoki has quit IRC | 07:18 | |
| *** rcernin has quit IRC | 07:29 | |
| *** rcernin has joined #openstack-lbaas | 07:47 | |
| *** aojea_ has joined #openstack-lbaas | 07:55 | |
| *** aojea has quit IRC | 07:58 | |
| *** rcernin has quit IRC | 08:06 | |
| *** rcernin has joined #openstack-lbaas | 08:07 | |
| *** rcernin has quit IRC | 08:10 | |
| *** rcernin has joined #openstack-lbaas | 08:10 | |
| *** amotoki has joined #openstack-lbaas | 08:14 | |
| *** amotoki has quit IRC | 08:19 | |
| *** kobis has joined #openstack-lbaas | 08:23 | |
| *** yamamoto has quit IRC | 08:31 | |
| *** bbbzhao has joined #openstack-lbaas | 08:43 | |
| *** bzhao has quit IRC | 08:46 | |
| *** rcernin has quit IRC | 08:46 | |
| *** rcernin has joined #openstack-lbaas | 08:46 | |
| *** rcernin_ has joined #openstack-lbaas | 08:48 | |
| *** fnaval has quit IRC | 08:53 | |
| *** amotoki has joined #openstack-lbaas | 09:15 | |
| *** amotoki has quit IRC | 09:19 | |
| *** yamamoto has joined #openstack-lbaas | 09:31 | |
| *** gongysh has quit IRC | 09:39 | |
| *** gongysh has joined #openstack-lbaas | 09:41 | |
| *** gongysh has quit IRC | 09:47 | |
| *** reedip has quit IRC | 09:51 | |
| *** yamamoto has quit IRC | 09:56 | |
| *** belharar has joined #openstack-lbaas | 09:57 | |
| *** yamamoto has joined #openstack-lbaas | 10:04 | |
| *** krypto has joined #openstack-lbaas | 10:05 | |
| *** krypto has joined #openstack-lbaas | 10:05 | |
| *** amotoki has joined #openstack-lbaas | 10:16 | |
| *** amotoki has quit IRC | 10:20 | |
| *** sanfern has quit IRC | 10:28 | |
| *** yamamoto has quit IRC | 11:00 | |
| *** oomichi has quit IRC | 11:09 | |
| *** oomichi has joined #openstack-lbaas | 11:13 | |
| *** amotoki has joined #openstack-lbaas | 11:17 | |
| *** amotoki has quit IRC | 11:21 | |
| *** yamamoto has joined #openstack-lbaas | 11:25 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 11:33 | |
| *** krypto has quit IRC | 11:38 | |
| *** krypto has joined #openstack-lbaas | 11:39 | |
| *** krypto has quit IRC | 11:39 | |
| *** krypto has joined #openstack-lbaas | 11:39 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-lbaas | 11:47 | |
| *** reedip has joined #openstack-lbaas | 11:50 | |
| *** chlong has joined #openstack-lbaas | 12:17 | |
| *** gongysh has joined #openstack-lbaas | 12:43 | |
| *** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-lbaas | 12:46 | |
| *** ducttape_ has quit IRC | 12:47 | |
| *** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-lbaas | 12:48 | |
| *** ducttape_ has quit IRC | 13:12 | |
| *** kobis has quit IRC | 13:16 | |
| *** amotoki has joined #openstack-lbaas | 13:18 | |
| *** links has quit IRC | 13:22 | |
| *** amotoki has quit IRC | 13:23 | |
| strigazi | hi there, we have octatia in our magnum jobs. Recently, diskimage-builder and dib-utils removed their /bin dir that used contain some shell script that could be used instead of installing. | 13:24 |
| strigazi | Have you address this chnage in stable/newton? | 13:25 |
| *** kobis has joined #openstack-lbaas | 13:31 | |
| strigazi | from this job run in newton i think that is the problem: http://logs.openstack.org/98/450698/1/check/gate-functional-dsvm-magnum-api-identity-v3-only-ubuntu-xenial-nv/b9f4125/logs/devstacklog.txt.gz#_2017-03-28_13_00_50_062 | 13:33 |
| *** amotoki has joined #openstack-lbaas | 13:34 | |
| *** sanfern has joined #openstack-lbaas | 13:43 | |
| *** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-lbaas | 13:43 | |
| *** belharar has quit IRC | 13:51 | |
| *** bzhao_ has joined #openstack-lbaas | 14:04 | |
| *** yamamoto has quit IRC | 14:12 | |
| johnsom | strigazi It is addressed in master, but maybe we don't have all of the backports done yet. It is very frustrating the number of breaking changes from DIB and their lack of stable branches | 14:25 |
| *** armax has joined #openstack-lbaas | 14:27 | |
| strigazi | johnsom yeah we have a similar problem but thankfully only on job. Maybe you could pin to a commit for the stable branches. i don't know if this is a good practice though | 14:28 |
| johnsom | Right, there are trade offs. I will take a look at or stable branches today. | 14:30 |
| *** gongysh has quit IRC | 14:38 | |
| dasm | johnsom: o/ i'm releasing updates for newton. neutron-lbaas was assigned to neutron team in newton. should i take care of that, or maybe you'll take it over from me? | 14:39 |
| dasm | https://github.com/openstack/releases/blob/master/deliverables/newton/neutron-lbaas.yaml | 14:39 |
| johnsom | dasm I have it. We still have backports anyway | 14:40 |
| dasm | johnsom: ack, thanks | 14:40 |
| *** armax has quit IRC | 14:41 | |
| *** armax has joined #openstack-lbaas | 14:41 | |
| *** krypto has quit IRC | 14:45 | |
| *** krypto has joined #openstack-lbaas | 14:45 | |
| *** kobis has quit IRC | 14:50 | |
| *** kobis has joined #openstack-lbaas | 14:51 | |
| *** kobis has quit IRC | 14:52 | |
| *** blogan has joined #openstack-lbaas | 14:53 | |
| *** fnaval has joined #openstack-lbaas | 14:57 | |
| *** dasm has quit IRC | 15:08 | |
| *** gcheresh_ has quit IRC | 15:08 | |
| *** dasm has joined #openstack-lbaas | 15:13 | |
| *** yamamoto has joined #openstack-lbaas | 15:13 | |
| *** krypto has quit IRC | 15:15 | |
| *** krypto has joined #openstack-lbaas | 15:16 | |
| *** sanfern has quit IRC | 15:19 | |
| *** krypto has quit IRC | 15:21 | |
| *** yamamoto has quit IRC | 15:23 | |
| *** rcernin has quit IRC | 15:31 | |
| *** rcernin_ has quit IRC | 15:31 | |
| *** sanfern has joined #openstack-lbaas | 15:31 | |
| johnsom | What the heck??? They are trying to remove our diversity tag???? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/448667 | 15:40 |
| *** fnaval has quit IRC | 15:52 | |
| *** fnaval has joined #openstack-lbaas | 15:59 | |
| *** aojea_ has quit IRC | 16:00 | |
| ankur-gupta-f4 | johnsom: make me a core!!! then it will become less that 50%. Quick fix. :P I have some questions about the Pools controller | 16:05 |
| xgerman | ha | 16:12 |
| *** pcaruana has quit IRC | 16:26 | |
| nmagnezi | johnsom, do they count neutron-lbaas? | 16:28 |
| johnsom | Yes | 16:28 |
| rm_work | ah i wonder if they realize brandon isn't RAX now? | 16:32 |
| rm_work | that'd reduce the rax core-number a bit | 16:33 |
| *** chlong has quit IRC | 16:34 | |
| johnsom | Well, technically all of neutron are still core too. You will see Armando and Ihar both did core reviews in octavia... | 16:35 |
| johnsom | The reason given on the patch is 56% reviews, but that is adding Intel and Rackspace together, which I don't think is reasonable. | 16:35 |
| nmagnezi | johnsom, sorry if it is a dumb question, but are there any implications for that tag? | 16:37 |
| johnsom | Well, yes, they could drop us as an official OpenStack project. | 16:38 |
| nmagnezi | wow, okay. | 16:38 |
| johnsom | If it is perceived to be a pet project of one company. | 16:38 |
| nmagnezi | btw if you look at the Ocata statistics, RAX is only 45%, so why do they give a verdict based on data that can change by the end of the cycle? | 16:39 |
| nmagnezi | http://stackalytics.com/?module=octavia&release=ocata | 16:39 |
| johnsom | They are going off of Pike data | 16:40 |
| xgerman | ok, so if jonsom and I review less we are good? | 16:47 |
| johnsom | I know, right.... | 16:47 |
| xgerman | uninetended consequences | 16:48 |
| *** chlong has joined #openstack-lbaas | 16:49 | |
| johnsom | Yeah, so looking at the tool output, 56% of the core reviews were from Rackspace employees. That is the problem in the view of the tag guidelines.... | 16:57 |
| johnsom | I guess as PTL I should register independent to not skew the numbers.... | 16:58 |
| *** bzhao_ has quit IRC | 17:09 | |
| *** krypto has joined #openstack-lbaas | 17:09 | |
| *** krypto has joined #openstack-lbaas | 17:09 | |
| rm_work | ankur-gupta-f4: replied to your comment on pools | 17:09 |
| rm_work | who else can review that today BTW? johnsom is already +2 | 17:10 |
| ankur-gupta-f4 | Yea i saw | 17:10 |
| ankur-gupta-f4 | But we are moving away from lookup since | 17:10 |
| rm_work | is diltram out? haven't heard from him yet this week | 17:10 |
| ankur-gupta-f4 | The url endpoints different | 17:10 |
| ankur-gupta-f4 | Its no longer the giant string of <lb-id>/listener/<list-id>/pool etc... | 17:11 |
| ankur-gupta-f4 | Which was the use case for lookup/remainder | 17:11 |
| ankur-gupta-f4 | Right | 17:11 |
| sshank | ankur-gupta-f4, /v2/pool/<pool_id>/member/... To find member that lookup is used. | 17:12 |
| rm_work | members have no high level endpoint, right | 17:13 |
| rm_work | even in this API | 17:13 |
| ankur-gupta-f4 | They do dont they | 17:14 |
| rm_work | I don't think so | 17:14 |
| ankur-gupta-f4 | Nvm | 17:14 |
| ankur-gupta-f4 | Ur right | 17:14 |
| reedip | _o | 17:14 |
| ankur-gupta-f4 | Okay | 17:14 |
| ankur-gupta-f4 | Makes sense | 17:14 |
| ankur-gupta-f4 | Thx | 17:14 |
| ankur-gupta-f4 | Ignore comment | 17:14 |
| rm_work | https://github.com/openstack/octavia/blob/master/octavia/tests/functional/api/v2/base.py#L49-L50 | 17:15 |
| rm_work | ah you found it, k | 17:15 |
| ankur-gupta-f4 | Yea looked at nlbaas api | 17:15 |
| rm_work | HMs do have their own though, but i guess we are still allowing them to be addressable via that? | 17:15 |
| rm_work | maybe the HM piece of _loopup() could go away? | 17:16 |
| ankur-gupta-f4 | Yea | 17:16 |
| ankur-gupta-f4 | In which case lookup seems like a misnomer | 17:16 |
| reedip | so who is becoming the new core :) | 17:16 |
| ankur-gupta-f4 | But its okay for now | 17:16 |
| ankur-gupta-f4 | I vote sshank | 17:16 |
| rm_work | can't be rax or intel :P | 17:17 |
| reedip | why rm_work ? | 17:17 |
| rm_work | that's the whole issue | 17:17 |
| reedip | ?? | 17:17 |
| rm_work | is that rax and intel control most of the reviews apparently | 17:17 |
| reedip | oh diversity tag | 17:18 |
| reedip | because of cores? | 17:18 |
| rm_work | yeah | 17:18 |
| reedip | and non-cores dont count? | 17:18 |
| rm_work | apparently not to them | 17:18 |
| reedip | but how did they arrive at 56% ? | 17:20 |
| reedip | http://stackalytics.com/report/contribution/octavia/90 shows 6 cores for octavia with 3 from RAX | 17:21 |
| reedip | And well blogan , is he there in RAX? | 17:22 |
| nmagnezi | reedip, even better, see the whole group of lbaas related projects http://stackalytics.com/report/contribution/octavia-group/90 | 17:29 |
| reedip | but thats with puppet octavia and oter projects, right ? | 17:29 |
| reedip | hey I am on number#5 :D | 17:30 |
| nmagnezi | johnsom, would know the answer to that. I know that includes at least neutron-lbaas neutron-lbaas-dashboard octavia | 17:30 |
| *** amotoki has quit IRC | 17:31 | |
| johnsom | https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/projects/octavia.html | 17:31 |
| johnsom | That is the official list. Also, there is an "Octavia official" group in stackalytics | 17:31 |
| reedip | johnsom : yeah | 17:32 |
| ankur-gupta-f4 | ugh just remembered i need to work on the client. thanks johnsom for the reminder | 17:32 |
| reedip | the thing is they are combining neutron-lbaas | 17:32 |
| reedip | and other neutron-lbaas items | 17:32 |
| ankur-gupta-f4 | reedip: you have like a lot of free time to help me out :) | 17:32 |
| reedip | and other neutron-lbaas projects* | 17:32 |
| reedip | ankur-gupta-f4 : its 2 AM here | 17:33 |
| rm_work | where IS the core list? need to de-register blogan | 17:33 |
| ankur-gupta-f4 | reedip: and...? | 17:33 |
| rm_work | stackalytics still has him as rax prolly | 17:33 |
| reedip | But Yes I will help you out tomorrow morning ! | 17:33 |
| ankur-gupta-f4 | haha awesome thanks | 17:33 |
| reedip | rm_work : you can go to gerrit and do that I guess | 17:33 |
| reedip | wait | 17:33 |
| reedip | https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/501,members | 17:34 |
| reedip | https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/1013,members | 17:34 |
| reedip | the second one is the dashboard core | 17:34 |
| reedip | and thats the interesting one | 17:35 |
| reedip | It includes Horizon cores :) | 17:35 |
| johnsom | Yeah, octavia still includes neutron cores as well | 17:35 |
| reedip | but cant see Brandon anywhere here | 17:36 |
| reedip | am I checking the wrong list ? | 17:36 |
| reedip | I can see that people can be added and deleted, but cant find brandon | 17:37 |
| reedip | ankur-gupta-f4 : ping me with whatever work needs to be done, I am going to sleep | 17:37 |
| ankur-gupta-f4 | okay | 17:37 |
| blogan | rm_work, johnsom: you can't kill me! you can't kill the undead | 17:40 |
| diltram | rm_work: I'm here, you need smth? | 17:40 |
| diltram | blogan: :P | 17:41 |
| rm_work | was just wondering :P | 17:41 |
| blogan | hey diltram! how's the baby? | 17:41 |
| diltram | where are you? why your desk is still empty? | 17:41 |
| rm_work | hadn't seen you talk in a bit | 17:41 |
| blogan | rm_work: i'm always listening | 17:41 |
| rm_work | lol | 17:41 |
| blogan | watching, waiting to pounce | 17:41 |
| diltram | blogan: great, he starting to cry on beginning of night but for the rest of day he's awesome :) | 17:41 |
| blogan | diltram: like all night? | 17:42 |
| diltram | blogan: no, max an hour | 17:42 |
| diltram | it's PURPLE cyring | 17:43 |
| diltram | but today he asleep around 1AM and he was sleeping till 7 :D | 17:43 |
| diltram | rm_work: I'm lost in the cloud-init/dpdk stuff :P | 17:44 |
| diltram | I'm trying to make our gates functional finally :P | 17:44 |
| *** aojea has joined #openstack-lbaas | 17:45 | |
| xgerman | diltram just give it wodka | 17:50 |
| diltram | a baby? | 17:51 |
| xgerman | isn’t that what they do in Russia? | 17:51 |
| xgerman | “in Soviet Russia bat drank Vodka” | 17:52 |
| xgerman | bat=baby | 17:52 |
| johnsom | FYI, I already hit the big delete button in the sky on blogan's core.... (I may or may not have been laughing maniacally at the time...) | 17:52 |
| johnsom | That isn't going to help the ocata stats though... | 17:52 |
| blogan | diltram: how old is he? | 17:52 |
| *** gcheresh_ has joined #openstack-lbaas | 17:52 | |
| diltram | xgerman: I don't know what people do in Russia, never was there | 17:52 |
| blogan | johnsom: i live in! dont worry, i've got a timebomb in octavia's code | 17:53 |
| johnsom | I would consider letting him back in if he sings the hymn for us though..... grin | 17:53 |
| blogan | i mean...i probably have many of them | 17:53 |
| blogan | bc my code | 17:53 |
| diltram | blogan: 9 weeks | 17:53 |
| johnsom | blogan You aren't kidding.... | 17:53 |
| johnsom | grin | 17:53 |
| * blogan glares at johnsom | 17:53 | |
| blogan | diltram: you're a lucky asshole | 17:53 |
| diltram | I know :D | 17:54 |
| blogan | i have another friend who just had a baby and they're like "yeah he's sleeping 4 hours at a time" | 17:54 |
| blogan | thats wonderful | 17:54 |
| diltram | :D :D | 17:54 |
| diltram | mine is sleeping for like 4 hours in day | 17:54 |
| diltram | but on night he's sleeping 5-7 right now :) | 17:55 |
| xgerman | wow, that’s huge | 17:55 |
| *** krypto has quit IRC | 17:55 | |
| blogan | diltram: well congratulations, really, im glad its a bit easier | 17:56 |
| diltram | blogan: like for the first one, he's the best what I could get | 17:57 |
| *** kbyrne has quit IRC | 18:00 | |
| johnsom | FYI, heads up, I will be putting a patch in to change the service type to "load-balancer" per the discussion in the service type repo. Even though there is zero traction in that repo, I have started the process in infra and German has put in the patch for OSA | 18:00 |
| diltram | johnsom: ok | 18:00 |
| *** tesseract has quit IRC | 18:06 | |
| *** kbyrne has joined #openstack-lbaas | 18:09 | |
| *** gcheresh_ has quit IRC | 18:10 | |
| openstackgerrit | Michael Johnson proposed openstack/octavia master: Changing the service-type to load-balancer https://review.openstack.org/450916 | 18:12 |
| *** gcheresh_ has joined #openstack-lbaas | 18:19 | |
| *** aojea has quit IRC | 18:29 | |
| *** aojea has joined #openstack-lbaas | 18:29 | |
| *** aojea has quit IRC | 18:34 | |
| *** eandersson_ is now known as eandersson | 18:35 | |
| *** kbyrne has quit IRC | 18:50 | |
| *** kbyrne has joined #openstack-lbaas | 18:52 | |
| *** armax has quit IRC | 18:55 | |
| *** dlundqui1 has quit IRC | 19:03 | |
| *** dlundquist has joined #openstack-lbaas | 19:03 | |
| *** aojea has joined #openstack-lbaas | 19:32 | |
| *** armax has joined #openstack-lbaas | 19:50 | |
| rm_work | anyone for +A on Pools? :P | 20:42 |
| rm_work | want to move to members! | 20:42 |
| *** ducttape_ has quit IRC | 20:50 | |
| *** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-lbaas | 20:50 | |
| *** ducttape_ has quit IRC | 20:51 | |
| johnsom | rm_work Do you think members is ready for review? I haven't had a minute today to look | 20:52 |
| johnsom | But I want to keep going.... | 20:52 |
| *** gcheresh_ has quit IRC | 20:55 | |
| *** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-lbaas | 20:57 | |
| rm_work | hmmm | 21:02 |
| rm_work | i need to revisit really quick | 21:02 |
| rm_work | hmm yeah i think there's a little bit still broken with members | 21:07 |
| rm_work | i need to take a look at it still | 21:07 |
| *** ianychoi has quit IRC | 21:07 | |
| *** aojea has quit IRC | 21:07 | |
| *** ianychoi has joined #openstack-lbaas | 21:08 | |
| *** ducttape_ has quit IRC | 21:11 | |
| johnsom | Ok. I'm helping a user debug an amp issue, so.... take your time grin | 21:11 |
| openstackgerrit | Adam Harwell proposed openstack/octavia master: Introduce Octavia v2 API for Members https://review.openstack.org/405932 | 21:18 |
| rm_work | well there's ... a rebase and minor fix | 21:18 |
| *** aojea has joined #openstack-lbaas | 21:29 | |
| *** ipsecguy has quit IRC | 21:47 | |
| *** aojea has quit IRC | 21:49 | |
| *** aojea has joined #openstack-lbaas | 21:49 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/octavia master: Changing the service-type to load-balancer https://review.openstack.org/450916 | 21:51 |
| *** aojea has quit IRC | 21:54 | |
| *** cody-somerville has joined #openstack-lbaas | 22:08 | |
| *** fnaval has quit IRC | 22:08 | |
| rm_work | POOOOOOOLS | 22:29 |
| rm_work | Review it! :P | 22:29 |
| * rm_work heads out for the day | 22:29 | |
| *** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-lbaas | 22:30 | |
| *** yamamoto has joined #openstack-lbaas | 22:30 | |
| *** ducttape_ has quit IRC | 22:36 | |
| *** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-lbaas | 22:36 | |
| *** yamamoto has quit IRC | 22:37 | |
| *** ducttape_ has quit IRC | 22:39 | |
| *** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-lbaas | 22:39 | |
| *** ducttape_ has quit IRC | 22:39 | |
| nmagnezi | johnsom, are you busy? I have a question about communication between octavia-api <-> octavia-worker | 22:44 |
| johnsom | nmagnezi Sure, what is your question? | 22:44 |
| nmagnezi | johnsom, i have an env (not devstack) with Octavia deployed, and I see requests reach octavia-api just fine. but for some reason nothing is being passed to the worker. I checked and rabbitmq options seem to look okay | 22:46 |
| nmagnezi | trying to figure out what else can it be | 22:46 |
| nmagnezi | the worker log show no action some something is preventing it from getting the events | 22:46 |
| nmagnezi | s/some/so | 22:46 |
| openstackgerrit | OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/octavia master: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/451046 | 22:47 |
| johnsom | Hmmm, so you see a 202 in the api log, but nothing popping off the queue in the controller worker. | 22:48 |
| johnsom | First thought, look in the API process logs with a guru report. | 22:51 |
| johnsom | nmagnezi Find the octavia-api process ID, do a kill -SIGUSR2 on it. This will dump the config into the log. | 22:52 |
| *** fnaval has joined #openstack-lbaas | 22:52 | |
| johnsom | Look for " api_handler = queue_producer" | 22:53 |
| * nmagnezi take notes | 22:53 | |
| johnsom | Just to make sure the no-op testing handler isn't being used for some reason | 22:53 |
| *** yamamoto has joined #openstack-lbaas | 22:53 | |
| nmagnezi | johnsom, yup i set queue_producer explicitly to make sure that is not the case | 22:53 |
| johnsom | Ok, so you thought of that already | 22:54 |
| nmagnezi | but what you suggested above might reveal new info | 22:54 |
| johnsom | Yeah, it dumps the "as running" configuration | 22:54 |
| nmagnezi | i'll get to that | 22:54 |
| nmagnezi | i knew such thing exists, but didn't know how to do it | 22:54 |
| nmagnezi | nice :) | 22:54 |
| johnsom | It helps to find when there are multiple config lines added by mistake | 22:54 |
| *** yamamoto has quit IRC | 22:56 | |
| nmagnezi | ack. thanks! | 22:56 |
| johnsom | All of the rabbit stuff is in there too. | 22:58 |
| johnsom | Thinking about what else I might check for that.... I would check the octavia-api and octavia-worker logs for rabbit errors, but I'm sure you have covered that already. | 23:00 |
| *** yamamoto has joined #openstack-lbaas | 23:03 | |
| reedip | ankur-gupta-f4 : around? | 23:23 |
| *** yamamoto has quit IRC | 23:24 | |
| ankur-gupta-f4 | reedip: heyo. Give me a second | 23:24 |
| reedip | seconds up .. | 23:24 |
| reedip | :P | 23:24 |
| reedip | take ur time :) | 23:24 |
| ankur-gupta-f4 | reedip: sorry was dealing with JIRA | 23:29 |
| ankur-gupta-f4 | good morning | 23:29 |
| ankur-gupta-f4 | whats up | 23:29 |
| reedip | Did you apply Heeng with it | 23:29 |
| reedip | you wanted some client side support ? | 23:30 |
| ankur-gupta-f4 | yea. So this is going to be tricky. | 23:30 |
| ankur-gupta-f4 | let me dig out the IRC convo | 23:30 |
| reedip | oh ok | 23:31 |
| ankur-gupta-f4 | http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-sdks/%23openstack-sdks.2017-03-23.log.html | 23:31 |
| ankur-gupta-f4 | Huge convo about how to set up the initial client | 23:31 |
| ankur-gupta-f4 | in which basically this is not the way: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/448331/ | 23:32 |
| ankur-gupta-f4 | 1) help understanding fully what he wants 2) help getting it started. Got too much on my plate right now and wouldn't be able to take a look at it till Thursday/Friday | 23:33 |
| reedip | ankur-gupta-f4 : same here.. this is where our stratergy fails, when everyone is too self less :D | 23:33 |
| reedip | anyways, I will look at it tomorrow if all my patches dont finish up today . If they do, then today itself | 23:34 |
| reedip | will give back a respnse to you when you come back online today evening( for me) /today morning( for you ) | 23:34 |
| reedip | :) | 23:34 |
| ankur-gupta-f4 | Okay. Will reach out tmw | 23:34 |
| ankur-gupta-f4 | Or later this week | 23:35 |
| reedip | whenever you feel like, lemme know :) | 23:35 |
| reedip | I will comment/work on it in case you are too busy :) | 23:35 |
| ankur-gupta-f4 | K will add you to anything | 23:36 |
| *** catintheroof has joined #openstack-lbaas | 23:37 | |
| reedip | rm_work, johnsom : moved this patch to octavia , I believe zhaobo would be working on this with me in supporting role. Lemme know if you feel this bug doesnt apply to octavia | 23:44 |
| reedip | rm_work, johnsom : https://bugs.launchpad.net/octavia/+bug/1657089 | 23:44 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1657090 in octavia "duplicate for #1657089 [RFE]Add bandwidth_limit to vip" [Wishlist,In progress] - Assigned to zhaobo (zhaobo6) | 23:44 |
| johnsom | reedip I closed it duplicate of https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1657090 | 23:45 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1657090 in octavia "[RFE]Add bandwidth_limit to vip" [Wishlist,In progress] - Assigned to zhaobo (zhaobo6) | 23:45 |
| johnsom | There was more discussion already on 1657090 | 23:45 |
| reedip | johnsom : never ming | 23:45 |
| reedip | yeah saw that :) | 23:45 |
| reedip | dont know how 2 of them were created... :) | 23:45 |
| johnsom | I have that spec up on my screen in the "get to this soon" pile.... | 23:46 |
| reedip | HAHAHAHA :) | 23:46 |
| johnsom | I have one on top of it | 23:46 |
| reedip | I have it on ping zhaobo and others soon | 23:46 |
| johnsom | The life of a PTL, you have no idea | 23:46 |
| reedip | dont want to anytime soon :) | 23:46 |
| johnsom | It's 4:47 and I have an email to finish, one to start, a patch to comment on, a spec to comment on, and a spec to update. Then I can get back to what I had planned to work on today.... grin. | 23:48 |
| reedip | thats too much ... | 23:48 |
| reedip | I only have 4 patches to work upon, 2 specs to see and about 25 tabs open for reviews ... :D | 23:49 |
| reedip | and then I start my office at 9 am | 23:49 |
| reedip | its 8 right now ! | 23:49 |
| johnsom | Ha, so you are part way there! | 23:49 |
| johnsom | Do you have a minute to chat about this qos spec? | 23:50 |
| reedip | johnsom : sure ... | 23:50 |
| johnsom | Do you have a use case for this in addition to ZhaoBo? | 23:51 |
| reedip | from my side, as of now, no ... Not a specific use case but I understand his requirements technically. | 23:51 |
| johnsom | Either way we set this up, the end user that creates the LB could remove the restriction, either by deleting the QoS policy from neutron (which I think it would not let you do without removing it from the LB first) or by just updating the LB max_bps | 23:52 |
| reedip | johnsom : yes, therefore the policy for this would be admin_or_owner | 23:53 |
| reedip | i mean in policy.json | 23:53 |
| johnsom | I'm thinking it makes this a lot easier on us if we just accept a qos_policy_id on the LB and then we blindly apply it to the VIP port. | 23:54 |
| reedip | because Ideally only those users who are admins or owner of the port where the QoS is applied should be able to modify it | 23:54 |
| johnsom | That way when neutron adds some new feature/algorithm for the QoS we just get it for free and don't have to extend the API for it | 23:54 |
| johnsom | Right, they are the same people the can access the load balancer create/update right? | 23:55 |
| reedip | johnsom: I think zhaobo was convinced with this justification when you discussed it with me, and I shared the same to him | 23:55 |
| johnsom | Ok, so folks think just accepting the qos_policy_id is good enough? | 23:55 |
| reedip | so yes, the Spec should change to accept only the qos_policy_id. The rules connnected to the policy wont affect the default Octavia Driver as it doesnt accept DSCP markings | 23:55 |
| reedip | but third party driver would have to ignore it | 23:56 |
| reedip | johnsom : as per the last bit of discussion, yes ! | 23:56 |
| johnsom | Or use it, a user could specify it and have a backend honor it for something, that would be up to the user. | 23:56 |
| reedip | johnsom ; totally backened dependent | 23:57 |
| reedip | but we would have to give them the headsup | 23:57 |
| johnsom | In reality every device on the network gets to decide if it cares about those fields. Most just ignore | 23:57 |
| reedip | hmm... | 23:58 |
| reedip | sensible the devices are | 23:59 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!