Monday, 2022-11-21

*** dmellado_ is now known as dmellado02:54
vanougood morning03:39
arne_wiebalckGood morning vanou and Ironic!07:19
vanouHi arne_wiebalck07:38
rpittaugood morning ironic! o/08:14
vanougood morning rpittau08:30
rpittauhey vanou :)08:34
jrosserhello - can i build an aarch64 IPA with ironic-python-agent-builder on an x86 host, or do i need an aarch64 host to do that?10:16
dtantsurjrosser: a good question. I think the underlying diskimage-builder has an option for architecture, but I don't know if it can do builds for foreign arch10:40
dtantsurjrosser: https://docs.openstack.org/diskimage-builder/latest/user_guide/building_an_image.html#chosing-an-architecture does not provide a lot of details, but you can at least try10:41
jrosseri got as far as `chroot: failed to run command 'bin/tar': Exec format error`10:41
dtantsurthis is not promising10:51
dtantsurjrosser: I suggest you check with #openstack-dib on whether this scenario is supported at all10:51
rpittaujrosser: that is an indication that you can't build on a different arch, you need executables for aarch64, in particular chroot10:51
jrosserit does feel that way10:52
dtantsurjrosser: time to buy an RPi4! :D10:54
rpittauI mean, you could do that, but I don't think it's a straightforward operation10:54
arne_wiebalckjrosser: we tried to build aarch64 images on x86_64, but moved to an arm server to build it10:56
arne_wiebalck*them10:56
arne_wiebalck(the IPA images)10:57
jrosserok thankyou all thats helpful - i'm trying to boot my first arm server with ironic so i don't have that itself available to build the image yet10:57
jrossertime to get a GCP account i think10:57
dtantsurI'm actually eyeing an Orange Pi 5 for local ARM experiments.. but these are apparently hard to get your hands on11:03
rpittaummmm orange pie 11:15
dtantsur:)11:16
jssfrI have a RockPro64 and that was rather easy to obtain11:19
jssfr(but also in august)11:20
kubajjGood morning Ironic!11:33
kubajjdtantsur: What kind of unit tests would you expect for https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ironic/+/864057/ ? Should they be similar to the ones checking the status but store something in a mock db?11:35
dtantsurwill check after the current meeting11:35
dtantsurkubajj: I think you're on the right track, yes. You don't even need to mock the database, unit tests are all run with a temporary sqlite one.12:56
dtantsur(also left one comment re inventory structure)12:56
TheJuliagood morning13:51
dtantsurgood morning TheJulia 14:18
opendevreviewDmitry Tantsur proposed openstack/ironic master: [WIP] [PoC] A metal3 CI job  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ironic/+/86387314:18
TheJuliaToday feels like it will be a busy day14:26
dtantsurI have this feeling for the last few weeks..14:32
TheJuliaI connected to internal IRC and within 90 seconds someone from support was super happy to see me and was asking questions14:34
dtantsurheh, happens14:42
JayF#startmeeting ironic15:00
opendevmeetMeeting started Mon Nov 21 15:00:45 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is JayF. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.15:00
opendevmeetUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.15:00
opendevmeetThe meeting name has been set to 'ironic'15:00
JayFGood morning folks, who all is here today?15:00
erbarro/15:01
rlooo/15:01
ajyao/15:01
dtantsuro/15:01
rpittauo/15:01
JayF#topic Reminders15:02
JayF#note this week is American thanksgiving. Some contributors, including myself, may be gone this week. I should be here today and tomorrow and be gone the rest of the week.15:02
dtantsurenjoy your break!15:02
JayF#note as always, contributors are reminded to hashtag their posts with ironic-week-prio and reviewers are encouraged to focus on mr with those hashtags15:03
JayF#topic review action items15:04
JayFLooking at last week, there was only one action that I don't think has been done. We really really have to pick a date for the BM Sig.15:04
TheJuliao/15:04
JayFI'll make a point to look at the calendar and email some stakeholders about that today15:05
JayF#topic Review CI Status15:05
JayFDoes anyone have any meaningful updates for CI this week? I haven't noticed anything...15:05
dtantsurwell, I'm still working on a metal3 job if you're curious :)15:06
JayFI've been following along here and then flat. If you want to summarize your progress that'd be awesome15:06
JayF**in slack15:06
dtantsurright now you can watch it live trying to provision a cluster of 2 nodes: https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/stream/53675cde74194f41a641841b126bc874?logfile=console.log15:06
dtantsurgenerally, a lot of roadblocks because of 1) built-in assumptions in metal3-dev-env (our devstack), 2) peculiarities of opendev images (e.g. very tough iptables rules)15:07
dtantsuronce I see a green right, I'll need to do some negotiations with other metal3 folks re changes to metal3-dev-env (for now I'm accumulating them in my fork)15:07
dtantsurhttps://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ironic/+/863873 is the ironic side, https://github.com/metal3-io/metal3-dev-env/pull/1102 - metal315:07
JayFThanks for looking into that. It's a good thing that we're going to test with them \o/15:08
dtantsurrpittau is looking into building containers from cloned sources15:08
dtantsurslow progress overall, getting there though15:08
rpittauI think we're ok on the containers side, I'll take a look at the CI job this week too15:09
dtantsurrpittau: we'll most likely need more metal3-dev-env changes to set your new env variables15:09
JayFIt sounds like we're making progress; if there's anything folks can do to help please say so.15:11
JayF#note Metal3 co-testing job in the works by dtantsur; progress is steady but difficult15:11
JayF#topic 2023.1 works in progress15:12
rpittaudtantsur: yep15:12
dtantsurif I succeed, I'll probably make a presentation on how metal3-dev-env is structured15:12
JayFhttps://etherpad.opendev.org/p/IronicWorkstreams2023.1 I just added an update here about shard key15:13
JayFplease do take a look at shard key spec, we need to land ironic sharding on our side asap to give nova something to dev against15:14
JayFhttps://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ironic-specs/+/86180315:14
JayFAny other updates re: 2023.1 workstreams of note before I move on?15:14
JayFnext topic is BM SIG; we already talked about that: we need to get serious about taking the action and getting something on a clendar15:15
JayFI also see no RFE Review items on the agenda; skipping that15:15
dtantsuryeah, I think I'm finally available for that15:15
JayF#topic Open Discussion15:15
JayFAnything else anyone wants to discuss?15:15
dtantsurJayF: q: is the metal3 CI work a proper workstream?15:15
dtantsuri.e. should I track it there?15:15
JayFdtantsur: I mean, I'm happy to have anything we're actively spending time on documented in there15:16
JayFthere is no official/proper; it's just "I'm working on a neat ironic thing others might be interested in"15:16
JayFand the metal3 CI job certainly fits that definition15:16
dtantsurokay, done15:17
JayFthanks15:18
JayFif there's nothing for open discussion; I'll end the official meeting15:18
dtantsurone thing15:18
JayFhave a good holiday fellow us-ians. If you're not in the US; you have my permission to pretend it's a holiday there too :D15:19
JayFoh?15:19
dtantsurshould we form a working group for the quartely meetup organization?15:19
dtantsurI feel like we don't get far by just status checks. maybe 1 call among whoever is going to organize it?15:19
JayFI'm going to be honest, I don't know what "Working Group" really means w/r/t getting it done15:19
dtantsurwhich is probably arne_wiebalck, JayF and myself15:19
dtantsurpeople who care :)15:19
JayFI'm 1000% happy to do that, thank you for volunteering to organize ;) 15:19
dtantsursure thing15:19
dtantsurwhoever wants to help, please ping me after the meeting15:20
JayFjust today/tomorrow or next week if you want me there :D15:20
dtantsurright, let's see if arne_wiebalck is around15:20
* dtantsur returns the mic15:20
arne_wiebalckI am , just in another meeting at the same time, sorry 15:20
JayFthanks for owning that; it's been in my mind that's needed but I just don't have enough time or spoons for that to not have gotten dropped15:20
JayF#stopmeeting Ironic15:20
JayF#endmeeting ironic15:21
opendevmeetMeeting ended Mon Nov 21 15:21:01 2022 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)15:21
opendevmeetMinutes:        https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/ironic/2022/ironic.2022-11-21-15.00.html15:21
opendevmeetMinutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/ironic/2022/ironic.2022-11-21-15.00.txt15:21
opendevmeetLog:            https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/ironic/2022/ironic.2022-11-21-15.00.log.html15:21
JayFthere we go :D 15:21
* arne_wiebalck moves Ironic meeting in the calendar following DST changes ... 15:21
JayFI honestly hate our new non-DST meeting time :( 15:21
JayFIt means the first thing I do in the week is running a meeting :) 15:22
dtantsurperfect way to wake up, no? :D15:22
JayFit means the one morning I might need to start at 7:05 I don't get the choice lol15:22
JayF(it's 7:22am local time here)15:22
dtantsurJayF, arne_wiebalck, can we meet in 35 minutes? I don't want to make Jay wake up so early again15:23
arne_wiebalckheh, my calendar refuses ... 15:23
dtantsurarne_wiebalck: you should be able to download an ics file from eavesdrop.o.o15:24
arne_wiebalckdtantsur: download works, struggling to find how to import it ... anyway, deleted & recreated, I should be fine ... until March :-D15:28
dtantsur:D15:28
JayFIf you make sure the meetings are in your calendar as UTC15:29
JayFat least on my calendar it moves with DST15:29
dtantsur++15:31
dtantsurso, what about a call today? late notice, I know, but we have both holidays and timezone mismatch15:31
JayFSure, or really even just an email with a concrete date/time suggestion that I can say "sure" to15:32
ajyaHi, can anyone interested revisit Redfish interop profile patch - all new comments have been addressed, https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ironic/+/754061 Thanks.15:32
dtantsuroh, nice!15:33
dtantsurshould we add it to workstreams?15:33
arne_wiebalckajya: uh, nice!15:33
dtantsurif we finish the profile, I may try to find a place for it in our downstream processes15:33
JayFajya: I'm happy to +2 and land that once some of the experts on DMTF stuff weigh in :D 15:33
dtantsurI mean: I will try, and it may happen :)15:33
JayFI'm like "yep, that's a good looking profile" but I really don't know much about em lol15:33
arne_wiebalckdtantsur: what are workstreams?15:34
*** jpodivin_ is now known as jpodivin15:34
dtantsurarne_wiebalck: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/IronicWorkstreams2023.115:34
JayFarne_wiebalck: just a word that isn't "priorities' for the things we're working on15:35
JayFthis is the new "subteam status updates" from the meeting 15:35
dtantsurarne_wiebalck: are you free in 25 minutes re planning the quarterly meetup?15:35
arne_wiebalckdtantsur: ah, ok, thanks!15:35
ajyadtantsur, arne_wiebalck note it has been simplified from the initial version to start with something simple, it then can be extended as time goes and needs arise15:35
* arne_wiebalck missed some meetings 15:35
JayFarne_wiebalck: the whiteboard is also potentially useful again, I cleaned it out lol15:35
JayFthat's part of why the cycle specific stuff got moved out15:36
JayFso it didn't bitrot by design anymore lol15:36
arne_wiebalckdtantsur: ok to chat in 24 mins ... or now ?15:36
dtantsurin 24 minutes, I need a break, if possible15:36
JayFI could do nowish too15:36
JayF24 minutes is fine too15:36
JayFI'm flexible15:36
arne_wiebalckok, np15:36
arne_wiebalckhere? 15:37
JayFand both times will be pre-caffiene being processes in my system lol15:37
JayFwe can coordinate here and move to video if we really wanna15:37
arne_wiebalckJayF: ok, sounds good15:37
arne_wiebalckwe have the Bare Metal SIG room if need be15:37
JayFhttps://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ironic-specs/+/862538 unless someone squeaks loudly I'm going to land this (2023.1 work items) in the next few minutes15:47
JayF3x+215:47
JayFwe traditionally got +2 from all cores; but I want this to merge before the year 2026 so I'm not gonna wait :D 15:47
dtantsurJayF, arne_wiebalck, okay, so https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/ironic-quarterly-meetup16:00
dtantsurI've scaled down the timing a bit, 45 mins per panel is definitely too optimistic16:00
dtantsurI did put 2 ideas for the next one16:01
dtantsurour team will probably be out on the week of Feb 27, do you have any similar restrictions?16:01
JayFNot really16:02
JayFprobably too optimistic for 2/2023, but if we do scaling ironic16:03
JayFwe could at least preview shard key stuff16:03
arne_wiebalckdtantsur: JayF: o/16:03
* arne_wiebalck checks calendar ...16:03
arne_wiebalckthere are school holidays here the week before16:04
dtantsuris it good or bad? :)16:04
arne_wiebalcktough one16:04
dtantsurFOSDEM is on the 5th, try to squeeze in-between?16:05
arne_wiebalckwe used to have the meeting on the 2nd Tue of the month at 2pm UTC ... that is a little difficult for west coast16:06
arne_wiebalckdifficult == impossible :)16:06
dtantsuryeah, I'm afraid we need to expect a later time16:07
dtantsursomething around this hour16:07
arne_wiebalckyes16:07
JayF2am UTC == 4am local time for me16:07
arne_wiebalck2pm 16:07
arne_wiebalck:-D16:07
JayFthat'd be 4pm local time16:07
JayFwhich is less awful16:07
dtantsurI'm quite sure you're not in UTC+216:07
JayFwait; math16:08
JayFthat's exactly reversed16:08
JayFscratch that, it's just wrong16:08
dtantsurnow is 4pm UTC16:08
opendevreviewRuby Loo proposed openstack/ironic master: When pxe-booting, try to set boot device  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ironic/+/86481816:08
JayFit's 1600 UTC / 800 PST now. It'd be 1400 UTC which would be 600 PST16:08
dtantsurwhich seems mildly acceptable for both Europe and you16:08
JayFIt's doable16:09
arne_wiebalckwhat is doable, 2pm UTC or 4pm UTC?16:09
JayF2pm16:09
dtantsur1600-1800 UTC makes it 800-1000 for you and 1700-1900 for us16:09
* arne_wiebalck is about to suggest 3pm UTC :)16:10
JayFthat is OK too16:10
JayFbasically lets say, between 1400 and 2400 UTC16:10
dtantsurarne_wiebalck: you have issues with staying until 7?16:10
JayFfor me 16:10
arne_wiebalckdtantsur: depends on the day16:10
arne_wiebalckdtantsur: but in general I'd say yes16:11
arne_wiebalckdtantsur: as I am in the office at 8am16:11
arne_wiebalckdtantsur: that would be 11 hours16:11
dtantsur:(16:11
arne_wiebalckonce every 3 months (on the correct weekday is ok)16:11
dtantsurle sigh, okay, let's start with 3pm and see where it leads us16:12
* arne_wiebalck was about to say the same for 4pm :-D16:13
dtantsurguys, you're driving me insane :D16:13
JayFI think 3:33 is more lucky /s 16:13
* dtantsur turns into a barn owl and flies in the woods16:13
JayFlol16:13
JayFdtantsur: you going to own sending the invites?16:13
dtantsurmost likely16:14
JayFUTC 1500-1700 (?) 16:14
JayFor 1400-1600 16:14
dtantsurUTC 1500-1700 is the current version16:14
arne_wiebalckwhich day of the week?16:14
arne_wiebalckor which date rather16:14
dtantsurprobably not wise to do it on Friday or Thursday16:14
JayF2/8 ?16:15
JayFEr, Feb 816:15
JayFtalking about EU vs US things :P16:15
arne_wiebalckFeb 8 sounds good to me16:15
arne_wiebalck(Wed is a day where I can stay longer)16:16
dtantsurI don't have any objections to that16:16
arne_wiebalckdone16:16
JayF\o/16:17
dtantsurre invites: I can own that. I'll need to check if the foundation have any official channels for us to use16:17
JayFSo basically, send one to the list16:17
arne_wiebalck2 hours is long, though: the SIG meetings with presentations were never longer than 1 hour16:17
JayFtweet one and tell them to RT it16:17
JayFyou can get me to RT it as well16:17
JayFalso probably should do it on masto as well16:17
dtantsurarne_wiebalck: the SIG meetings were too short to attract people IMO16:17
dtantsurarne_wiebalck: also these are quarterly, not monthly16:17
arne_wiebalckok, let's see how it goes16:18
dtantsurif we cannot find enough content, that's a problem, of course16:18
arne_wiebalckit is ok to find speakers16:18
arne_wiebalckthe problem is the lack of interaction16:18
arne_wiebalckand to get people to join16:18
dtantsurthis is why I'm suggesting the panel format16:18
dtantsurwhen 3-4 people are discussing, not just presenting, it's more tempting to jump in16:19
dtantsurat least that's the experience we made during the local Ironic meetup16:19
arne_wiebalckrandom thought, maybe discussed already: why should this not be part of the openinfra live sessions?16:20
JayFI don't hate that idea arne_wiebalck 16:20
arne_wiebalcklike, every 3 months we have a slot there16:20
dtantsurthis is what I meant above re check with foundation16:20
dtantsurI'm going to open this discussion once we decide what *we* want16:20
JayFthat would lock it even more into a "push" format though16:20
arne_wiebalckand leverage their channels to announce16:20
JayFbut I think our consistuency already picked that for us 16:20
arne_wiebalckpush format?16:21
arne_wiebalckoh, less interactive?16:21
JayFyeah, exactly16:21
dtantsurthis is something we can ask and fall back to a regular call16:21
JayFlike it's more passive for the audience16:21
JayFthey do Q&A for openinfra live but it's not intended to be a super interactive format16:21
arne_wiebalcktrue16:21
dtantsurright16:21
JayFbut that's kinda how SIGs have gone in practice virtually too16:22
dtantsurwhich does not mean that they're not open to other ideas16:22
JayFso IDK 16:22
dtantsurlet's try to decide what we want to see, then we can ask them if they are willing to help with that16:23
arne_wiebalckhow about we have a "beginner" and an "advanced" topic in such a session?16:24
dtantsurlike it16:24
arne_wiebalckI am worried noone will join if we go too deep, it may scare new people off16:25
dtantsurwe'll need to agree on a definition of "beginner" though16:25
arne_wiebalckI can filter :-D16:25
dtantsurwe *could* frame the scale question the both ways16:25
arne_wiebalcktrue, we have to make an effort to make sure it is presented the way we intend16:26
dtantsuractually, "scaling for beginners" could make heck of a topic16:26
JayFhonestly we could probably for 15 minutes on "all the cool stuff Ironic can do that you may not do yet" and couch it as beginning16:26
dtantsurthat too16:27
JayFtalk about stuff like rebuilds, conductor groups, bifrost, metal3 16:27
JayFjust something to showcase Ironic's versatility and depth of featureset16:27
JayFwe do lots of "boring" infra stuff which is easily ignored, so we gotta make loud noises about the boring stuff lol16:27
arne_wiebalckwe should probably have a "what is Ironic and what can it do for you" panel in the beginning, start from 0, so newcomers have the feeling they are welcome16:28
JayFI like that as a tagline16:28
arne_wiebalckthis also tags this a *new* series16:29
dtantsurI'd not include "what is Ironic", we don't expect a lot of people who don't know this16:29
dtantsurrisks undervaluing the panel16:29
dtantsur"things you did not know Ironic can do for you" :D16:29
arne_wiebalckI think we should try to attract new people who have no idea about Ironic16:30
JayFI don't think this is the venue for pulling in new folks16:31
dtantsurI don't disagree with that, but this is a huuuuge rabbit hole16:31
JayFhowever, we can create a video that new folks would be able to learn stuff from 16:31
arne_wiebalckif this is not the place, where is that place?16:31
dtantsurvideo tutorials could be huge for us16:31
JayFIDK how to pull in new folks; but I know "hey, you know this problem you have? Come to my NINETY MINUTE PRESENTATION about it" will have them running for the exits16:31
arne_wiebalckit is a 30 min interactive panel, I thought16:32
dtantsurarne_wiebalck: I'm struggling with the answer too.. but honestly, how often do you attend sessions titled "what is AbsolutelyUknownName"?16:32
JayFdtantsur: if we do a 20 minute panel on what can Ironic do for you; that becomes a video we can link to people16:32
JayFI don't think we're pulling in people with a openinfra venue16:32
arne_wiebalckwe will have the same 8 people as always in these sessions16:33
JayFwe'd have to go elsewhere; e.g. other conferences or the like to pull in new people16:33
JayFarne_wiebalck: I'm kinda afarid of the same thing16:33
JayFarne_wiebalck: which is why I liked the idea of doing it as an openinfra live16:33
arne_wiebalckgreat people, though! :)16:33
JayFmaybe their 8 people plus our 8 people, that'd be twice as nice /s16:33
arne_wiebalck(don't get me wrong)16:33
dtantsurmy hope is this: a larger quarterly meetup is an easier sell for people than a short mostly non-interactive monthly one16:34
arne_wiebalckok, we could also combine the ideas:16:34
dtantsurI may be *horribly* wrong16:34
dtantsurbut I don't have better ideas16:34
opendevreviewMerged openstack/ironic-specs master: Add Ironic work items for 2023.1  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ironic-specs/+/86253816:34
arne_wiebalckhave an openinfra live on the new SIG series and give the intro to ironic there16:34
arne_wiebalck"and if you want to know more in-depth stuff, come and join us!"16:34
dtantsurthis may work indeed16:35
JayFthat's a good idea16:35
dtantsurI don't think I can take organizing both (I do hope to take part)16:36
arne_wiebalckJayF: happy to take the openinfra one with you (PTL/dev + operator), wdyt?16:37
JayFsure16:38
arne_wiebalckok, so we aim for an openinfra live in January I would think?16:45
dtantsuryeah16:48
arne_wiebalckok, so we have a plan for now and bounce this off the rest of the team on the next weekly?16:50
arne_wiebalckand then get in touch with the openinfra team?16:51
dtantsurit's probably a good plan. we can also finalize the topic there16:51
arne_wiebalcksounds good!16:51
* arne_wiebalck has to leave, sorry16:51
arne_wiebalckthanks for the planning session JayF dtantsur !16:52
arne_wiebalckbye everyone o/16:52
dtantsurthank you too!16:52
JayF++ ty16:52
* dtantsur will leave soon as well16:52
rpittaubye o/17:07
opendevreviewJulia Kreger proposed openstack/ironic-specs master: Add a shard key  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ironic-specs/+/86180318:20
elodillesJayF: hi, sorry for pinging here, could you please have a look at these Antelope-1 sushy and metalsmith release patches? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/864538 && https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/86452318:35
JayFI've been waiting for dtantsur / iurygregory / rpittau to look at those; part of why they are release liasons is they have a better idea sometimes when might be picked up downstream18:55
JayFif none of them have taken a look by say, EOD, I'll look myself and almost certainly approve18:55
elodillesJayF: ack, thanks in advance!18:57
opendevreviewJulia Kreger proposed openstack/ironic master: WIP: Disable md5 by default  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ironic/+/86518919:22
TheJuliathere is not a good way to wire that into the agent19:22
TheJuliaactually, I have an idea there19:31
opendevreviewJulia Kreger proposed openstack/ironic-python-agent master: WIP: Disable md5  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ironic-python-agent/+/86519019:50
opendevreviewJulia Kreger proposed openstack/ironic master: WIP: Disable md5 by default  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ironic/+/86518920:06
opendevreviewJulia Kreger proposed openstack/ironic stable/wallaby: Remove un-needed tabs from script  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ironic/+/86519220:14
opendevreviewJulia Kreger proposed openstack/ironic-inspector master: Use declarative reader/writer with enginefacade  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ironic-inspector/+/46376820:24
opendevreviewJulia Kreger proposed openstack/ironic-inspector master: Use declarative reader/writer with enginefacade  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ironic-inspector/+/46376821:16
opendevreviewJulia Kreger proposed openstack/ironic-inspector master: SQLAlchemy 2.0 prep  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ironic-inspector/+/86073121:16
iurygregoryJayF, I will try to check after my dinner today 22:35
JayFI mean, do you care when the milestone release of metalsmith/sushy goes out?22:36
JayFif no, just say no and keep your evening and I'll go land em :D 22:36
iurygregorywe don't care that much when we release sushy metalsmith =)23:05
JayFI'll go +1 both those for elodilles then23:09
iurygregoryack23:27
opendevreviewJay Faulkner proposed openstack/ironic master: Implement periodic task for populating shards tbl  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ironic/+/86495423:30

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!