| opendevreview | Jonathan Heathcote proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-rabbitmq_server master: Workaround rabbitmq-server issue #3369 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-rabbitmq_server/+/940963 | 10:21 |
|---|---|---|
| noonedeadpunk | if somebody working on rabbitmq upgrade - can you please check on adding this command as pre-upgrade step? https://www.rabbitmq.com/docs/man/rabbitmq-queues.8#check_if_node_is_quorum_critical | 10:25 |
| noonedeadpunk | ideally - we need to check on possibility to trigger rabbitmq-queues rebalance or rabbitmq-queues grow | 10:28 |
| noonedeadpunk | this is smth in my todo list, but can't get down to it for a month or so :( | 10:29 |
| jrosser | noonedeadpunk: is tht any upgrade, or specifically moving to quorum queues? | 10:35 |
| noonedeadpunk | So it's mostly important during OS upgrade | 10:38 |
| noonedeadpunk | as quorum queues are not automatically split over cluster members | 10:38 |
| noonedeadpunk | they are originally, but if you re-setup OS, you at the end left up with pretty much broken cluster | 10:38 |
| noonedeadpunk | so each time you finish controller upgrade - you'd need to execute `rabbitmq-queues grow/add_member` | 10:39 |
| noonedeadpunk | but I didn't do very deep dive into that... | 10:40 |
| noonedeadpunk | and, same with stream actually | 10:40 |
| noonedeadpunk | https://www.rabbitmq.com/docs/man/rabbitmq-streams.8#Replication | 10:40 |
| noonedeadpunk | and we're missing all that tracking so far... | 10:41 |
| noonedeadpunk | so 22.04 -> 24.04 is now /o\ | 10:42 |
| noonedeadpunk | (as second thing is OVN) | 10:42 |
| jrosser | ah right so we did upgrade to quorum queues on one deployment but did not yet do 22.04->24.04 | 10:47 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/ansible-hardening master: Auto-fix yaml rules https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-hardening/+/941501 | 10:52 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/ansible-hardening master: Auto-fix usage of modules via FQCN https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-hardening/+/941502 | 10:52 |
| noonedeadpunk | we also didn't do upgrade yet in production, but I've spotted that issue in my personal sandbox, thus - in backlog and ENOTIME.... | 10:55 |
| noonedeadpunk | and that work is smth we'd need for 2024.2 as well | 10:58 |
| opendevreview | Jonathan Rosser proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Bump SHAs for master https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/943000 | 15:50 |
| opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Bump SHAs for master https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/943000 | 15:57 |
| noonedeadpunk | I actually was quite sure that's gonna fail with latest tempest | 15:58 |
| noonedeadpunk | due to https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/930296 | 15:58 |
| noonedeadpunk | but yeah, we actually have that value defined in tempest.conf | 15:59 |
| opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible stable/2023.2: Bump SHAs for 2023.2 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/943190 | 16:07 |
| noonedeadpunk | I wonder if that's really still applicable when we've migrated from mnesia https://opendev.org/openstack/openstack-ansible-rabbitmq_server/src/branch/master/templates/advanced.config.j2#L5 | 16:14 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstack-ansible-lxc_hosts master: Use distro-specific SSH service name https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-lxc_hosts/+/942812 | 16:54 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_nova master: Auto-fix usage of modules via FQCN https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_nova/+/941388 | 17:32 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstack-ansible stable/2024.2: Bump SHAs for 2024.2 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/942771 | 18:08 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstack-ansible stable/2024.1: Bump SHAs for 2024.1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/942997 | 18:48 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstack-ansible-haproxy_server stable/2024.2: Fix non-lazy ternery expression https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-haproxy_server/+/940962 | 20:06 |
| opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible stable/2024.2: Update haproxy_server SHA https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/943209 | 20:43 |
| noonedeadpunk | maybe let's quickly merge that? ^ | 20:44 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstack-ansible-rabbitmq_server master: Workaround rabbitmq-server issue #3369 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-rabbitmq_server/+/940963 | 20:46 |
| noonedeadpunk | doh. or wait for this backport as well ^ | 20:48 |
| noonedeadpunk | or maybe release current bugfix and just get onether one in 2 weeks... | 20:49 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstack-ansible master: Bump SHAs for master https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/943000 | 20:49 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_cinder master: Auto-fix usage of modules via FQCN https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_cinder/+/941286 | 23:42 |
| opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-rabbitmq_server stable/2024.2: Workaround rabbitmq-server issue #3369 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-rabbitmq_server/+/940964 | 23:53 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!