*** dviroel|rover is now known as dviroel|out | 00:20 | |
pojadhav | rlandy, https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/c/openstack/tripleo-ci-internal-jobs/+/401519 done | 01:43 |
---|---|---|
pojadhav | i have rebased it yesterday, it again went in conflict. | 01:44 |
*** ysandeep|out is now known as ysandeep | 04:11 | |
ysandeep | rlandy, >> ysandeep|out: had to revert https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/config/+/41247 , let me check what went wrong. | 04:36 |
*** bhagyashris|ruck is now known as bhagyashris|sick | 04:37 | |
ysandeep | bhagyashris|sick: take care | 04:39 |
ysandeep | rlandy: got the issue | 04:40 |
ysandeep | ~~~ | 04:41 |
ysandeep | $ git commit -mTrigger for scenario010-kvm | 04:41 |
ysandeep | error: pathspec 'for' did not match any file(s) known to git | 04:41 |
ysandeep | error: pathspec 'scenario010-kvm' did not match any file(s) known to git | 04:41 |
ysandeep | ~~~ | 04:41 |
ysandeep | rlandy, missing quotes around "{{ }}" messed it up: git commit -m{{ trigger_commit_msg|default('Trigger for scenario010-kvm') }} | 04:41 |
ysandeep | reviewbot: please add to review list https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/config/+/42360 | 04:56 |
reviewbot | I have added your review to the Review list | 04:56 |
ysandeep | rlandy, ^^ with fix | 04:56 |
*** marios is now known as marios|ruck | 05:06 | |
marios|ruck | \o/ | 05:06 |
marios|ruck | good morning | 05:06 |
ysandeep | marios|ruck, good morning :) happy friday o/ | 05:08 |
marios|ruck | ysandeep: \o | 05:10 |
chandankumar | marios|ruck: \o | 05:19 |
chandankumar | marios|ruck: I approved https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/+/839694 and https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/+/839724 it will fix undercloud containers wallaby job. | 05:20 |
marios|ruck | chandankumar: thanks i just checked https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:lp%252F1970710 :) | 05:21 |
marios|ruck | chandankumar: this one is not needed? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_tempest/+/839790 | 05:21 |
chandankumar | marios|ruck: not needed, but good to have | 05:22 |
marios|ruck | chandankumar: k | 05:23 |
*** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|afk | 05:39 | |
*** ysandeep|afk is now known as ysandeep | 06:00 | |
ysandeep | chandankumar, marios|ruck when you get a chance could you please review: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/config/+/42360 , I repused the patch with a fix for a issue we hit yesterday. If we can merge this early - I can do more testing that nothing broke by it. | 06:02 |
marios|ruck | ysandeep: ack | 06:04 |
ysandeep | marios++ | 06:05 |
chandankumar | no | 06:07 |
Tengu | rlandy: ok, so there's really an issue with my iptables TRIPLEO_INPUT thingy. No idea why yet, but the plain master passed that step (though it failed tempest later). I'm digging into that, wondering if there isn't some kind of weird check done against iptables content in, for instance, neutron. | 06:14 |
Tengu | I'll check with Networking next week if I don't find my way out today. | 06:15 |
*** amoralej|off is now known as amoralej | 06:19 | |
amoralej | hi, i have some jobs in rdo failing when running tempestconf | 06:44 |
amoralej | https://logserver.rdoproject.org/73/41273/11/check/rdoinfo-tripleo-master-testing-centos-8-scenario001-standalone/c153e03/logs/undercloud/var/log/tempest/tempestconf.log.txt.gz | 06:44 |
amoralej | ERROR tempest config_tempest.services.base.ServiceError: Request on service 'volumev3' with url 'http://192.168.24.3:8776/v3/extensions' failed with code 404 | 06:44 |
amoralej | sounds familiar? | 06:44 |
marios|ruck | amoralej: looking ( we had a tempest issue yesterday might be) | 06:44 |
amoralej | note it's centos8, we are moving those to centos9 but still centos8 | 06:45 |
marios|ruck | amoralej: k this looks like different issue | 06:46 |
marios|ruck | amoralej: noting to dig some more in a bit | 06:46 |
amoralej | ok, i'll dig on it | 06:46 |
*** jpena|off is now known as jpena | 07:07 | |
*** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|lunch | 07:32 | |
marios|ruck | Tengu: are we going to /waiting for something to revert there wrt 09:14 < Tengu> rlandy: ok, so there's really an issue with my iptables TRIPLEO_INPUT thingy. No idea why yet, | 08:19 |
Tengu | marios|ruck: not merged yet :) | 08:21 |
Tengu | we caught the issue before it actually hits perdiodic jobs. I've -w the patch already. | 08:21 |
Tengu | I'm probably not that far from a working thing though. just..... weird. | 08:22 |
marios|ruck | Tengu: thanks | 08:23 |
Tengu | or... wait. did I mix things up now? | 08:24 |
Tengu | lemme double-re-recheck things. | 08:24 |
Tengu | being under medication isn't helping my brain lately. | 08:25 |
marios|ruck | Tengu: ack mainly let me know if we need to prioritize something for revert (i just picked up ruck shift today) | 08:25 |
Tengu | nah, nothing to revert for this case | 08:25 |
Tengu | just holding a merge. | 08:25 |
marios|ruck | k | 08:26 |
Tengu | oh. wow. ok. this time the "ping router ip address" was actually skipped. | 08:26 |
marios|ruck | coffee brb | 08:26 |
frenzy_friday | Hey marios|ruck , do periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-9-ovb-1ctlr_1comp-featureset002-master and periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-9-standalone-upgrade-master have known failures? I see mixed results in the job history, wanted to check if they are failing or if it is a problem with my patch | 09:14 |
marios|ruck | frenzy_friday: depends :) what is the failure gimme link | 09:15 |
marios|ruck | frenzy_friday: not heard of stndaloen upgrade issue but we have various introspection bugs for the fs2 one maybe | 09:16 |
*** ysandeep|lunch is now known as ysandeep | 09:16 | |
frenzy_friday | marios|ruck, https://paste.opendev.org/show/bb4tpjHmXBddppFyVAVa/ Thanks! | 09:19 |
marios|ruck | frenzy_friday: the upgrade one we don't have filed and the provision one seems different to the ones we have | 09:24 |
marios|ruck | frenzy_friday: which patch is it? | 09:24 |
marios|ruck | frenzy_friday: that looks like testproject | 09:25 |
frenzy_friday | https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/testproject/+/42265 (after changing periodic jobs to pull from quay) | 09:25 |
marios|ruck | frenzy_friday: remove the standalone-upgrade one | 09:26 |
marios|ruck | frenzy_friday: i mean we removed that from master | 09:26 |
marios|ruck | frenzy_friday: see https://review.rdoproject.org/zuul/builds?job_name=periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-9-standalone-upgrade-master (only testproject runs there) | 09:27 |
marios|ruck | frenzy_friday: for the provision one i am not sure it seems different to existing bugs but i really don't think it is related to your patches | 09:30 |
marios|ruck | frenzy_friday: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/+/839305 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/839323 i mean | 09:30 |
frenzy_friday | marios|ruck, cool, thanks | 09:31 |
frenzy_friday | bot pls add to review list https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/+/839305 (change pull registry to quay), https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/839323 (change pull registry to quay) | 09:37 |
reviewbot | I have added your review to the Review list | 09:37 |
reviewbot | I have added your review to the Review list | 09:37 |
*** marios|ruck is now known as marios|ruck|lunch | 10:23 | |
rlandy | marios|ruck|lunch | 10:25 |
rlandy | hello - how are things | 10:25 |
rlandy | need help with anything? | 10:25 |
rlandy | marios|ruck|lunch: when you are back - let's touch base about wallaby c8 | 10:25 |
rlandy | Tengu: hi - reading back ... | 10:26 |
rlandy | re: your patch ... not sure if it's a real thing unless you caught something | 10:27 |
rlandy | chandankumar: are we all set with https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:lp%252F1970710? | 10:27 |
chandankumar | rlandy: yes | 10:28 |
rlandy | frenzy_friday: hello | 10:28 |
chandankumar | rlandy: on os_tempest one, still not sure we need it | 10:28 |
rlandy | frenzy_friday: pld see private | 10:29 |
rlandy | pls | 10:29 |
*** marios|ruck|lunch is now known as marios|ruck | 10:46 | |
marios|ruck | rlandy: o/ hey ... re w8 i am waiting for it to kick in 15 mins to check whether https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/+/839526 clears us there | 10:47 |
marios|ruck | rlandy: (or is in in 1hour 15? at 1200 UTC probably in 1:15 then) | 10:48 |
rlandy | marios|ruck: it's UTC | 10:51 |
rlandy | marios|ruck: need help with anything else? | 10:51 |
marios|ruck | rlandy: no not drowning yet ;) all things are on the ruck|rover pad | 10:51 |
rlandy | k - wil read | 10:51 |
rlandy | let me know if you need help with downstream etc. | 10:52 |
marios|ruck | rlandy: just fyi about the network component as it was raised in hand-off i filed a new bug today (on hackmd) ... that has been a thing for at *least* 10 days logs on bug from 19th | 10:52 |
marios|ruck | rlandy: and again provision bug :/ | 10:52 |
marios|ruck | \o/ | 10:52 |
marios|ruck | but seems like a different one anyway ... | 10:53 |
rlandy | marios|ruck: is that still an issue? | 10:53 |
rlandy | marios|ruck: k - let's sync on all that when dasm|off is in | 10:53 |
marios|ruck | rlandy: well latest from yesterday | 10:53 |
marios|ruck | rlandy: so yeah | 10:53 |
marios|ruck | rlandy: sure 13:53 < rlandy> marios|ruck: k - let's sync on all that when dasm|off is in | 10:53 |
rlandy | then we will know what handoff is needed | 10:53 |
chandankumar | marios|ruck: rlandy please have a look https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/839898 when free, | 10:53 |
marios|ruck | chandankumar: commented/question | 10:56 |
rlandy | marios|ruck: our gate stats are kind of bad | 10:58 |
rlandy | 80% | 10:58 |
rlandy | could be the undercloud issue from yesterday | 10:58 |
rlandy | nothing in gate now | 10:58 |
rlandy | but just fyi if you see something | 10:59 |
chandankumar | marios|ruck: replied | 10:59 |
chandankumar | will explain in review time if needed | 10:59 |
marios|ruck | chandankumar: yeah i was also commenting | 10:59 |
marios|ruck | chandankumar: so ok but i am just wondering if we want to only change that one place | 10:59 |
marios|ruck | chandankumar: k lets discuss in a few mins on reviews | 11:00 |
reviewbot | Do you want me to add your patch to the Review list? Please type something like add to review list <your_patch> so that I can understand. Thanks. | 11:00 |
marios|ruck | rlandy: ack but only 2 fails on gate jobs and none from today yet | 11:00 |
rlandy | and https://sf.hosted.upshift.rdu2.redhat.com/zuul/t/tripleo-ci-internal/builds?job_name=periodic-tripleo-rhel-9-upload-job-trigger-rhos-17+&skip=0 is broken | 11:00 |
rlandy | "msg": "Failed to download packages: openvswitch2.15-2.15.0-53.el9fdp.x86_64: Cannot download, all mirrors were already tried without success", | 11:01 |
chandankumar | rlandy: I think they updated ovs | 11:02 |
marios|ruck | rlandy: ack .. same from yesterday so seems like a consistent thing 2022-04-28 07:05:07.447163 | primary | "msg": "Failed to download packages: openvswitch2.15-2.15.0-52.el9fdp.x86_64: Cannot download, all mirrors were already tried without success", | 11:02 |
chandankumar | may be 2.17 landed | 11:02 |
rlandy | chandankumar: you locked that version? | 11:02 |
chandankumar | rlandy: Nope, I did not locked the version | 11:02 |
chandankumar | jjoyce removed the bad version | 11:03 |
chandankumar | rlandy: I fixed the centos package usage in downstream | 11:03 |
rlandy | interesting it's only the trigger job that fails with it | 11:03 |
*** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|afk | 11:03 | |
* rlandy finds code | 11:04 | |
marios|ruck | rlandy: k i'll file a bug for it anyway we may need to point to it | 11:04 |
marios|ruck | rlandy: we have 2 examples now | 11:04 |
chandankumar | rlandy: is it on centos? | 11:04 |
chandankumar | trigger job which runs downstream | 11:04 |
chandankumar | sorry it is downstream job | 11:05 |
chandankumar | ignore the last comment | 11:05 |
rlandy | https://opendev.org/zuul/zuul-jobs/src/branch/master/roles/multi-node-bridge/tasks/common.yaml#L46 | 11:05 |
rlandy | chandankumar: yep rhel | 11:05 |
rlandy | chandankumar: marios|ruck: ^^ that is the line | 11:05 |
rlandy | we need to see what ovs_package resolves to | 11:05 |
*** jgilaber is now known as jgilaber|lunch | 11:06 | |
marios|ruck | rlandy: https://opendev.org/zuul/zuul-jobs/src/branch/master/roles/multi-node-bridge/vars/CentOS.yaml | 11:06 |
marios|ruck | rlandy: doesn't have a version there | 11:06 |
rlandy | RHEL | 11:06 |
chandankumar | https://opendev.org/zuul/zuul-jobs/src/branch/master/roles/multi-node-bridge/vars/RedHat.yaml#L4 | 11:06 |
rlandy | https://opendev.org/zuul/zuul-jobs/src/branch/master/roles/multi-node-bridge/vars/RedHat.yaml#L4 | 11:06 |
chandankumar | rhosp-openvswitch | 11:06 |
rlandy | yep | 11:06 |
chandankumar | rlandy: please check the pre playbook | 11:06 |
rlandy | why only the trigger job? | 11:07 |
chandankumar | rlandy: https://opendev.org/zuul/zuul-jobs/src/branch/master/roles/multi-node-bridge/tasks/common.yaml#L18 | 11:07 |
chandankumar | Does this task Set up RDO GPG key getting executed? | 11:07 |
rlandy | 2022-04-29 07:22:24.260563 | TASK [multi-node-bridge : Set up RDO GPG key] | 11:11 |
rlandy | 2022-04-29 07:22:24.326061 | primary | skipping: Conditional result was False | 11:11 |
rlandy | chandankumar: ^^ | 11:11 |
marios|ruck | actually we want bugzilla not launchpad for this one ... going | 11:12 |
rlandy | marios|ruck: ack ... at this point the version would have to be on the node | 11:12 |
rlandy | we have not laid out any repos yet | 11:13 |
rlandy | chandankumar: you guys updated the rhel image version yesterday, right? | 11:13 |
rlandy | | Label: upstream-rhel-9-0 | 11:13 |
rlandy | change there? | 11:13 |
* rlandy rekicks failing ovb there in the mean time | 11:14 | |
chandankumar | rlandy: nodeset should be single-rhel-9-node | 11:16 |
chandankumar | not upstream-rhel-9-0 | 11:16 |
marios|ruck | rlandy: chandankumar: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2080254 | 11:16 |
marios|ruck | joining review call | 11:16 |
rlandy | k | 11:16 |
chandankumar | rlandy: yes, let me check the last change | 11:17 |
*** dviroel|out is now known as dviroel | 11:21 | |
chandankumar | rlandy: https://opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-ansible/src/branch/master/zuul.d/layout.yaml#L29 | 11:23 |
Tengu | rlandy: heya! soooo I think the failing ping IS an issue. I'll work with slaweq shortly on that. I really don't see what may cause this issue in the firewall, guess it's somewhere deeper in the network. | 11:27 |
rlandy | chem: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-upgrade/+/836794 - can you review - we are tearing down ussuri - but we need upgrades to sign off on this removal | 11:39 |
rlandy | Tengu: k - let us know when we are ready to review again | 12:17 |
chem | rlandy: hey, ack, +2, waiting for ci to push it. | 12:19 |
chandankumar | marios|ruck: https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/c/testproject/+/405580 testing here to find out which ovs package name is taken there | 12:25 |
marios|ruck | chandankumar: ack | 12:25 |
Tengu | rlandy: sure. | 12:26 |
rlandy | chem: thanks | 12:38 |
*** amoralej is now known as amoralej|lunch | 12:48 | |
chandankumar | rlandy: marios|ruck https://sf.hosted.upshift.rdu2.redhat.com/logs/80/405580/1/check/periodic-tripleo-rhel-9-upload-job-trigger-rhos-17/fe309a7/job-output.txt | 12:50 |
chandankumar | rlandy: marios|ruck package name is rhosp-openvswitch | 12:51 |
chandankumar | but why it is pulling openvswitch2.15-2.15.0 | 12:51 |
marios|ruck | chandankumar: thanks | 12:51 |
chandankumar | weired | 12:51 |
rlandy | chandankumar: any overrides in downstream? | 12:51 |
rlandy | maybe we forked that? | 12:52 |
marios|ruck | chandankumar: rhosp-openswitch resolves to that ... maybe release team will know | 12:52 |
chandankumar | openvswitch : install vars per OS | 12:52 |
chandankumar | got skipped | 12:52 |
chandankumar | worth opening a bug and cixing it | 12:52 |
chandankumar | rlandy: no any overrides used | 12:52 |
rlandy | chandankumar: lon would | 12:53 |
marios|ruck | chandankumar: we have a bug there https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2080254 | 12:53 |
rlandy | let's ping lon with that | 12:53 |
marios|ruck | rlandy: chandankumar: there https://github.com/redhat-openstack/rdoinfo/blob/7abd73cf9fc981c4c789d440948e195909291927/buildsys-tags/cloud9s-openstack-wallaby-testing.yml#L1013-L1015 | 12:58 |
marios|ruck | rlandy: chandankumar: ah no.. that is for rdo... maybe we have something similar in downstream then | 12:58 |
chandankumar | marios|ruck: in downstream it comes from rh0s-17 trunk candidate repos | 12:59 |
marios|ruck | chandankumar: thanks looking at the rhos-delivery chat now | 12:59 |
chandankumar | marios|ruck: rlandy setting up, will check stuff in night | 13:14 |
rlandy | chandankumar: k - what are you checking? | 13:15 |
rlandy | so I know what to pick up | 13:15 |
*** amoralej|lunch is now known as amoralej | 13:32 | |
*** ysandeep|afk is now known as ysandeep | 13:36 | |
dasm|off | o/ | 13:45 |
*** dasm|off is now known as dasm|ruck | 13:45 | |
dasm|ruck | marios|ruck: rlandy if you're looking me, i'm here | 13:46 |
marios|ruck | o/ dasm|ruck | 13:46 |
marios|ruck | lets do a sync in a bit | 13:46 |
dasm|ruck | ack | 13:46 |
marios|ruck | dasm|ruck: https://hackmd.io/ITStP2VvSYmxgNVJf56s5w?view | 13:46 |
dasm|ruck | ack | 13:47 |
*** pojadhav is now known as pojadhav|afk | 13:50 | |
* dviroel biab | 14:05 | |
*** amoralej is now known as amoralej|off | 14:24 | |
dasm|ruck | marios|ruck: wanna sync up? | 14:28 |
marios|ruck | rlandy: do you want to join me and dasm|ruck for a sync? if so what time works for you? otherwise me and dasm|ruck can sync in a minute | 14:28 |
marios|ruck | dasm|ruck: ack lets see if rlandy will join | 14:28 |
marios|ruck | s/will/wants to | 14:28 |
dasm|ruck | doesn't she have a conflict? | 14:28 |
dasm|ruck | she dropped for another meeting, right? | 14:29 |
marios|ruck | dasm|ruck: don't know does she have another call? k didn't realise | 14:29 |
dasm|ruck | that's what inderstood when she dropped | 14:29 |
dasm|ruck | marios|ruck: https://meet.google.com/qyq-rmrp-gcn | 14:29 |
marios|ruck | dasm|ruck: k - not too much to hand off so we can do a quick sync whenever you like | 14:29 |
marios|ruck | dasm|ruck: ack joining | 14:29 |
rlandy | marios|ruck: have 1-1 | 14:31 |
dasm|ruck | ack, | 14:31 |
marios|ruck | rlandy: k no probl can sync after | 14:31 |
dasm|ruck | rcastillo: can you check again? https://review.rdoproject.org/r/q/topic:rr_refactor+is:open | 14:31 |
rcastillo | dasm|ruck: sure | 14:31 |
*** jgilaber|lunch is now known as jgilaber | 14:32 | |
marios|ruck | coffee brb | 14:41 |
ysandeep | dasm|ruck, I have reviewed and +2 all of your open rr refactoring patches, thank you for that work. | 14:44 |
ysandeep | rlandy: marios|ruck is ruck/rovering but if dviroel or you want to review and +w those rr patches please go ahead, those patches looks good to go from my side. | 14:45 |
dasm|ruck | ysandeep: thanks! | 14:46 |
dviroel | ack | 14:46 |
rlandy | dasm|ruck: will sync with you after 1-1's | 14:47 |
dasm|ruck | ack | 14:47 |
rlandy | marios|ruck: dasm|ruck: do you have a plan wrt c8 wallaby? | 14:47 |
ysandeep | rlandy, could you please +w https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/c/openstack/tripleo-ci-internal-jobs/+/405457 | 14:48 |
dasm|ruck | hmm... it's in a bad shape indeed: > status=Red last_promotion=2022-04-19 20:43:43 | 14:48 |
marios|ruck | dasm|ruck: rlandy: yeah as discussed earlier was waiting for the run from today to see if we get clear with https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/+/839526 | 14:51 |
marios|ruck | dasm|ruck: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/42352/1#message-cfa6ddce952d7a4d8dbd141a6b35dcee070e491d | 14:52 |
dasm|ruck | ack | 14:53 |
dasm|ruck | i started: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/testproject/+/42374 | 14:53 |
dasm|ruck | brb | 14:54 |
ysandeep | dasm|ruck: fyi.. http://pastebin.test.redhat.com/1048673 - looks like now we are also capturing results in rr script for non periodic jobs, I think we had some logic earlier to only check results/filter for jobs that starts with periodic-, may be we dropped that somewhere during refactoring.. We should fix that in a follow up. | 14:54 |
ysandeep | dasm|ruck: in this case http://pastebin.test.redhat.com/1048673 , not check results for weirdo or consistent job | 14:54 |
dasm|ruck | it's not loading for me | 14:55 |
dasm|ruck | but is it a problem? we're not showing them in the Cockpit, right? | 14:55 |
ysandeep | ack, let me paste in openstack pastebin.. its not sensitive info | 14:55 |
dasm|ruck | oh, it's back | 14:55 |
dasm|ruck | ah, i see what you mean | 14:56 |
ysandeep | dasm|ruck, https://paste.openstack.org/show/bVVkjXD9ykegOou4NnVc/ | 14:56 |
ysandeep | yeah all our periodic job have 'periodic' prefix | 14:56 |
dasm|ruck | so we should be showing only "periodic" jobs, right? | 14:56 |
dasm|ruck | it's an easy fix. | 14:56 |
ysandeep | dasm|ruck: correct | 14:56 |
dasm|ruck | ysandeep: can you give me CLI which you used to get that output? | 14:57 |
ysandeep | thanks, currently its showing status=Red last_promotion=2022-04-27 23:26:52, even though all periodic jobs passed | 14:57 |
dasm|ruck | yeah, that's not right | 14:58 |
ysandeep | rr --release train --distro centos-7 | 14:58 |
dasm|ruck | ack | 14:58 |
ysandeep | rr is just an alias to ruck_rover.py | 14:58 |
dasm|ruck | ack | 14:58 |
dasm|ruck | yeah, i see it | 14:58 |
ysandeep | dasm|ruck: thanks, see you on monday o/ | 14:59 |
dasm|ruck | i'll address it. thanks ysandeep | 14:59 |
dasm|ruck | o/ | 14:59 |
* ysandeep out, have a great weekend everyone :) | 14:59 | |
dasm|ruck | you too | 14:59 |
*** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|out | 14:59 | |
* dasm|ruck => brb | 14:59 | |
* dasm|ruck is back | 15:08 | |
dviroel | FYI http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-April/028354.html | 15:13 |
dasm|ruck | ysandeep|out: fyi: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/42375 | 15:16 |
dasm|ruck | dviroel: :( part of the history dies in front of our eyes. | 15:16 |
dasm|ruck | I get the explanation, but it saddens me | 15:16 |
dviroel | :( | 15:17 |
marios|ruck | its like final confirmation that openstack isnt' sexy any more... doesn't even get names now. just a number | 15:17 |
marios|ruck | stable/2023.1 | 15:17 |
dasm|ruck | there is a response from Allison: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-April/028356.html | 15:26 |
dasm|ruck | I agree with that -- names add sexiness :) | 15:26 |
marios|ruck | ;) | 15:30 |
dasm|ruck | marios|ruck: wanna score easy merges? https://review.rdoproject.org/r/q/topic:rr_refactor+is:open :) | 15:33 |
marios|ruck | dasm|ruck: rlandy: starting shutdown sequence let me know if you need something before i go in a bit | 15:33 |
dasm|ruck | ha! :D | 15:33 |
marios|ruck | dasm|ruck: if you want me to just merge them i can but if you want me to review them then i'll check on monday ;) | 15:33 |
marios|ruck | up to you | 15:34 |
dasm|ruck | marios|ruck: actually it's up to you. ysandeep|out went over them already and said "lgtm" | 15:34 |
marios|ruck | dasm|ruck: k | 15:35 |
marios|ruck | dasm|ruck: (merge party) | 15:35 |
dasm|ruck | nice! | 15:37 |
dasm|ruck | ~o~ | 15:38 |
marios|ruck | dasm|ruck: so since the c8 wallaby line choked today ... probably we should go with https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/42352/1#message-ca75a07a69002b54f492648a5967804b8862b764 rlandy what do you think? | 15:39 |
marios|ruck | rlandy: if you agree you can merge that and dasm|ruck can you please make sure we revert it as soon as it promotes? | 15:39 |
dasm|ruck | i'm OK with that | 15:40 |
dasm|ruck | https://www.techrepublic.com/article/linux-fedora-project-matthew-miller/ | 15:44 |
* dviroel lunch | 15:45 | |
*** dviroel is now known as dviroel|lunch | 15:45 | |
rlandy | dasm|ruck: marios|ruck: yep - go with dviroel|lunch's patch | 15:48 |
rlandy | marios|ruck: dasm|ruck: w+'ing that | 15:48 |
rlandy | pls revert afterwards | 15:48 |
marios|ruck | rlandy: ack | 15:48 |
rlandy | dasm|ruck: are you on internal?? | 15:49 |
rlandy | pls jpin | 15:49 |
rlandy | join | 15:49 |
dasm|ruck | rlandy: sorry, forgot. joined | 15:50 |
marios|ruck | o/ have a good weekend | 15:53 |
*** marios|ruck is now known as marios|out | 15:53 | |
chandankumar | see ya! | 16:00 |
dasm|ruck | o/ | 16:01 |
*** jpena is now known as jpena|off | 16:30 | |
*** dviroel|lunch is now known as dviroel | 16:47 | |
dasm|ruck | brb | 17:05 |
dasm|ruck | back | 17:18 |
dasm|ruck | dviroel: we're in a bad spot with your change: https://logserver.rdoproject.org/52/42352/1/gate/mol-container_push/68fd363/tox/reports.html | 17:52 |
dasm|ruck | > ("toomanyrequests: You have reached your pull rate limit. You may increase the limit by authenticating and upgrading: https://www.docker.com/increase-rate-limit") | 17:52 |
dasm|ruck | i don't think rechecking is gonna change anything here :/ | 17:53 |
dasm|ruck | fyi: it's from newest test run | 17:53 |
dasm|ruck | or maybe? "push_manifests" is green this time | 17:54 |
rlandy | dasm|ruck; where is that? | 17:59 |
dviroel | dasm|ruck: maybe they reduced the rate limit? not common to see this error so frequently | 17:59 |
rlandy | you should be pulling from quay.io | 17:59 |
rlandy | not docker | 18:00 |
dasm|ruck | rlandy: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/42352 | 18:00 |
dasm|ruck | i'm not sure if we're on quay everywhere already | 18:00 |
dasm|ruck | dviroel: let's give it another try. results are non-conclusive | 18:01 |
rlandy | recheck one last time | 18:02 |
dasm|ruck | on it | 18:02 |
rlandy | but those molecule tests need to change | 18:02 |
dasm|ruck | i agree | 18:02 |
rlandy | dasm|ruck: can you check where they are pulling | 18:02 |
rlandy | change the registry ther | 18:02 |
rlandy | there | 18:02 |
dasm|ruck | ofc | 18:02 |
dasm|ruck | dviroel: if i'm seeing this. does it mean i'm using too old hash? | 18:04 |
dasm|ruck | > {"changed": false, "msg": "The DLRN hash or tag is not recognized. The hash or tag should not contain path slashes."} | 18:04 |
dasm|ruck | https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/testproject/+/41128 | 18:04 |
rlandy | dasm|ruck: that is the hashtag of an aggregrate hash | 18:08 |
rlandy | component jobs need a component hash | 18:08 |
rlandy | commit _distr hash format | 18:08 |
rlandy | baremetal-master - component job | 18:09 |
dasm|ruck | hmm... this is what i got from ruck_rover. Does it mean it's wrong? | 18:09 |
dasm|ruck | hmmm | 18:09 |
rlandy | yes | 18:10 |
dasm|ruck | ack | 18:10 |
rlandy | dasm|ruck: also component jobs don;t use force_periodic: true | 18:11 |
rlandy | they run with current-tripleo | 18:11 |
rlandy | I mentioned that to ysandeep|out to fix | 18:11 |
dasm|ruck | i must've missed that then | 18:11 |
dasm|ruck | fs01 and fs35 removed from criteria. kicked off promotion line stable1-cs8 | 18:41 |
dasm|ruck | https://review.rdoproject.org/zuul/status/change/6830c9bf9da681d189ce90ff1a15dcca238a2e1d | 18:43 |
dasm|ruck | (-‸ლ) | 18:43 |
dasm|ruck | there is still fs01 and fs35 | 18:43 |
* dviroel going out for weekend - have a great one @team o/ | 18:47 | |
dasm|ruck | dviroel: o/ have a good one | 18:49 |
rlandy | dasm|ruck: need help with something? | 18:52 |
dasm|ruck | rlandy: two things: i'm still trying to run component baremetal and it's not working to me: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/testproject/+/41128 | 18:54 |
dasm|ruck | and i kicked off promo for stable1-cs8 but it semms to be still running with fs01 and fs35 | 18:54 |
rlandy | https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-jobs/+/42101 is merged | 18:54 |
rlandy | don't need depends | 18:54 |
dasm|ruck | yeah, but when i started promo line after that with podman: https://review.rdoproject.org/zuul/status/change/6830c9bf9da681d189ce90ff1a15dcca238a2e1d | 18:54 |
dasm|ruck | it still shows both in passing criteria | 18:55 |
rlandy | dasm|ruck: https://meet.google.com/phc-xnqa-zst | 18:55 |
dasm|ruck | https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/testproject/+/41128 | 19:00 |
dasm|ruck | distro centos-8 --release wallaby | 20:19 |
dasm|ruck | status=Yellow last_promotion=2022-04-29 19:49:28 | 20:19 |
dasm|ruck | rlandy: we can merge the revert of cs8 wallaby criterias: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/41248 | 20:19 |
rlandy | dasm|ruck, w+'ed = thanks | 20:20 |
dasm|ruck | k, thx | 20:20 |
* rcastillo leaving | 22:07 | |
rcastillo | have a great weekend team o/ | 22:07 |
dasm|ruck | o/ | 22:10 |
rlandy | rcastillo: dasm|ruck: have a good weekend | 22:21 |
* dasm|ruck calls it a week | 22:29 | |
*** dasm|ruck is now known as dasm|ruck|off | 22:30 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!