Friday, 2022-04-29

*** dviroel|rover is now known as dviroel|out00:20
pojadhavrlandy, https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/c/openstack/tripleo-ci-internal-jobs/+/401519 done01:43
pojadhavi have rebased it yesterday, it again went in conflict.01:44
*** ysandeep|out is now known as ysandeep04:11
ysandeeprlandy, >> ysandeep|out: had to revert https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/config/+/41247 , let me check what went wrong.04:36
*** bhagyashris|ruck is now known as bhagyashris|sick04:37
ysandeepbhagyashris|sick: take care04:39
ysandeeprlandy: got the issue04:40
ysandeep~~~04:41
ysandeep$ git commit -mTrigger for scenario010-kvm04:41
ysandeeperror: pathspec 'for' did not match any file(s) known to git04:41
ysandeeperror: pathspec 'scenario010-kvm' did not match any file(s) known to git04:41
ysandeep~~~04:41
ysandeeprlandy, missing quotes around "{{ }}" messed it up: git commit -m{{ trigger_commit_msg|default('Trigger for scenario010-kvm') }} 04:41
ysandeepreviewbot: please add to review list https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/config/+/42360 04:56
reviewbotI have added your review to the Review list04:56
ysandeeprlandy, ^^ with fix04:56
*** marios is now known as marios|ruck05:06
marios|ruck\o/ 05:06
marios|ruckgood morning 05:06
ysandeepmarios|ruck, good morning :) happy friday o/ 05:08
marios|ruckysandeep: \o05:10
chandankumarmarios|ruck: \o05:19
chandankumarmarios|ruck: I approved https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/+/839694 and https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/+/839724 it will fix undercloud containers wallaby job. 05:20
marios|ruckchandankumar: thanks i just checked https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:lp%252F1970710 :)05:21
marios|ruckchandankumar: this one is not needed? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_tempest/+/83979005:21
chandankumarmarios|ruck: not needed, but good to have05:22
marios|ruckchandankumar: k 05:23
*** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|afk05:39
*** ysandeep|afk is now known as ysandeep06:00
ysandeepchandankumar, marios|ruck when you get a chance could you please review: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/config/+/42360 , I repused the patch with a fix for a issue we hit yesterday. If we can merge this early - I can do more testing that nothing broke by it.06:02
marios|ruckysandeep: ack 06:04
ysandeepmarios++06:05
chandankumarno06:07
Tengurlandy: ok, so there's really an issue with my iptables TRIPLEO_INPUT thingy. No idea why yet, but the plain master passed that step (though it failed tempest later). I'm digging into that, wondering if there isn't some kind of weird check done against iptables content in, for instance, neutron.06:14
TenguI'll check with Networking next week if I don't find my way out today.06:15
*** amoralej|off is now known as amoralej06:19
amoralejhi, i have some jobs in rdo failing when running tempestconf06:44
amoralejhttps://logserver.rdoproject.org/73/41273/11/check/rdoinfo-tripleo-master-testing-centos-8-scenario001-standalone/c153e03/logs/undercloud/var/log/tempest/tempestconf.log.txt.gz06:44
amoralejERROR tempest config_tempest.services.base.ServiceError: Request on service 'volumev3' with url 'http://192.168.24.3:8776/v3/extensions' failed with code 40406:44
amoralejsounds familiar?06:44
marios|ruckamoralej: looking ( we had a tempest issue yesterday might be)06:44
amoralejnote it's centos8, we are moving those to centos9 but still centos806:45
marios|ruckamoralej: k this looks like different issue06:46
marios|ruckamoralej: noting to dig some more in a bit06:46
amoralejok, i'll dig on it06:46
*** jpena|off is now known as jpena07:07
*** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|lunch07:32
marios|ruckTengu: are we going to /waiting for something to revert there wrt 09:14 < Tengu> rlandy: ok, so there's really an issue with my iptables TRIPLEO_INPUT thingy. No idea why yet, 08:19
Tengumarios|ruck: not merged yet :)08:21
Tenguwe caught the issue before it actually hits perdiodic jobs. I've -w the patch already.08:21
TenguI'm probably not that far from a working thing though. just..... weird.08:22
marios|ruckTengu: thanks 08:23
Tenguor... wait. did I mix things up now?08:24
Tengulemme double-re-recheck things.08:24
Tengubeing under medication isn't helping my brain lately.08:25
marios|ruckTengu: ack mainly let me know if we need to prioritize something for revert (i just picked up ruck shift today)08:25
Tengunah, nothing to revert for this case08:25
Tengujust holding a merge.08:25
marios|ruckk 08:26
Tenguoh. wow. ok. this time the "ping router ip address" was actually skipped.08:26
marios|ruckcoffee brb08:26
frenzy_fridayHey marios|ruck , do periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-9-ovb-1ctlr_1comp-featureset002-master and periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-9-standalone-upgrade-master have known failures? I see mixed results in the job history, wanted to check if they are failing or if it is a problem with my patch09:14
marios|ruckfrenzy_friday: depends :) what is the failure gimme link 09:15
marios|ruckfrenzy_friday: not heard of stndaloen upgrade issue but we have various introspection bugs for the fs2 one maybe 09:16
*** ysandeep|lunch is now known as ysandeep09:16
frenzy_fridaymarios|ruck, https://paste.opendev.org/show/bb4tpjHmXBddppFyVAVa/ Thanks!09:19
marios|ruckfrenzy_friday: the upgrade one we don't have filed and the provision one seems different to the ones we have 09:24
marios|ruckfrenzy_friday: which patch is it? 09:24
marios|ruckfrenzy_friday: that looks like testproject 09:25
frenzy_fridayhttps://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/testproject/+/42265 (after changing periodic jobs to pull from quay)09:25
marios|ruckfrenzy_friday: remove the standalone-upgrade one09:26
marios|ruckfrenzy_friday: i mean we removed that from master 09:26
marios|ruckfrenzy_friday: see https://review.rdoproject.org/zuul/builds?job_name=periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-9-standalone-upgrade-master (only testproject runs there)09:27
marios|ruckfrenzy_friday: for the provision one i am not sure it seems different to existing bugs but i really don't think it is related to your patches 09:30
marios|ruckfrenzy_friday: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/+/839305 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/839323 i mean 09:30
frenzy_fridaymarios|ruck, cool, thanks09:31
frenzy_fridaybot pls add to review list https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/+/839305 (change pull registry to quay), https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/839323 (change pull registry to quay)09:37
reviewbotI have added your review to the Review list09:37
reviewbotI have added your review to the Review list09:37
*** marios|ruck is now known as marios|ruck|lunch10:23
rlandymarios|ruck|lunch10:25
rlandyhello - how are things10:25
rlandyneed help with anything?10:25
rlandymarios|ruck|lunch: when you are back - let's touch base about wallaby c810:25
rlandyTengu: hi - reading back ...10:26
rlandyre: your patch ... not sure if it's a real thing unless you caught something10:27
rlandychandankumar: are we all set with https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:lp%252F1970710?10:27
chandankumarrlandy: yes10:28
rlandyfrenzy_friday: hello10:28
chandankumarrlandy: on os_tempest one, still not sure we need it10:28
rlandyfrenzy_friday: pld see private10:29
rlandypls10:29
*** marios|ruck|lunch is now known as marios|ruck10:46
marios|ruckrlandy: o/ hey ... re w8 i am waiting for it to kick in 15 mins to check whether https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/+/839526 clears us there10:47
marios|ruckrlandy: (or is in in 1hour 15? at 1200 UTC probably in 1:15 then)10:48
rlandymarios|ruck: it's UTC10:51
rlandymarios|ruck: need help with anything else?10:51
marios|ruckrlandy: no not drowning yet ;) all things are on the ruck|rover pad10:51
rlandyk - wil read10:51
rlandylet me know if you need help with downstream etc.10:52
marios|ruckrlandy: just fyi about the network component as it was raised in hand-off i filed a new bug today (on hackmd) ... that has been a thing for at *least* 10 days logs on bug from 19th10:52
marios|ruckrlandy: and again provision bug :/10:52
marios|ruck\o/10:52
marios|ruckbut seems like a different one anyway ... 10:53
rlandymarios|ruck: is that still an issue?10:53
rlandymarios|ruck: k - let's sync on all that when dasm|off is in10:53
marios|ruckrlandy: well latest from yesterday 10:53
marios|ruckrlandy: so yeah 10:53
marios|ruckrlandy: sure 13:53 < rlandy> marios|ruck: k - let's sync on all that when dasm|off is in10:53
rlandythen we will know what handoff is needed10:53
chandankumarmarios|ruck: rlandy please have a look https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/839898 when free, 10:53
marios|ruckchandankumar: commented/question10:56
rlandymarios|ruck: our gate stats are kind of bad10:58
rlandy80%10:58
rlandycould be the undercloud issue from yesterday10:58
rlandynothing in gate now10:58
rlandybut just fyi if you see something10:59
chandankumarmarios|ruck: replied10:59
chandankumarwill explain in review time if needed10:59
marios|ruckchandankumar: yeah i was also commenting10:59
marios|ruckchandankumar: so ok but i am just wondering if we want to only change that one place10:59
marios|ruckchandankumar: k lets discuss in a few mins on reviews11:00
reviewbotDo you want me to add your patch to the Review list? Please type something like add to review list <your_patch> so that I can understand. Thanks.11:00
marios|ruckrlandy: ack but only 2 fails on gate jobs and none from today yet11:00
rlandyand https://sf.hosted.upshift.rdu2.redhat.com/zuul/t/tripleo-ci-internal/builds?job_name=periodic-tripleo-rhel-9-upload-job-trigger-rhos-17+&skip=0 is broken11:00
rlandy"msg": "Failed to download packages: openvswitch2.15-2.15.0-53.el9fdp.x86_64: Cannot download, all mirrors were already tried without success",11:01
chandankumarrlandy: I think they updated ovs11:02
marios|ruckrlandy: ack .. same from yesterday so seems like a consistent thing 2022-04-28 07:05:07.447163 | primary |   "msg": "Failed to download packages: openvswitch2.15-2.15.0-52.el9fdp.x86_64: Cannot download, all mirrors were already tried without success",11:02
chandankumarmay be 2.17 landed11:02
rlandychandankumar: you locked that version?11:02
chandankumarrlandy: Nope, I did not locked the version11:02
chandankumarjjoyce removed the bad version11:03
chandankumarrlandy: I fixed the centos package usage in downstream11:03
rlandyinteresting it's only the trigger job that fails with it11:03
*** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|afk11:03
* rlandy finds code11:04
marios|ruckrlandy: k i'll file a bug for it anyway we may need to point to it 11:04
marios|ruckrlandy: we have 2 examples now11:04
chandankumarrlandy: is it on centos?11:04
chandankumartrigger job which runs downstream11:04
chandankumarsorry it is downstream job11:05
chandankumarignore the last comment11:05
rlandyhttps://opendev.org/zuul/zuul-jobs/src/branch/master/roles/multi-node-bridge/tasks/common.yaml#L4611:05
rlandychandankumar: yep rhel11:05
rlandychandankumar: marios|ruck: ^^ that is the line11:05
rlandywe need to see what ovs_package resolves to11:05
*** jgilaber is now known as jgilaber|lunch11:06
marios|ruckrlandy: https://opendev.org/zuul/zuul-jobs/src/branch/master/roles/multi-node-bridge/vars/CentOS.yaml11:06
marios|ruckrlandy: doesn't have a version there 11:06
rlandyRHEL11:06
chandankumarhttps://opendev.org/zuul/zuul-jobs/src/branch/master/roles/multi-node-bridge/vars/RedHat.yaml#L411:06
rlandyhttps://opendev.org/zuul/zuul-jobs/src/branch/master/roles/multi-node-bridge/vars/RedHat.yaml#L411:06
chandankumarrhosp-openvswitch11:06
rlandyyep11:06
chandankumarrlandy: please check the pre playbook11:06
rlandywhy only the trigger job?11:07
chandankumarrlandy: https://opendev.org/zuul/zuul-jobs/src/branch/master/roles/multi-node-bridge/tasks/common.yaml#L1811:07
chandankumarDoes this task Set up RDO GPG key getting executed?11:07
rlandy2022-04-29 07:22:24.260563 | TASK [multi-node-bridge : Set up RDO GPG key]11:11
rlandy2022-04-29 07:22:24.326061 | primary | skipping: Conditional result was False11:11
rlandychandankumar: ^^11:11
marios|ruck actually we want bugzilla not launchpad for this one ... going 11:12
rlandymarios|ruck: ack ... at this point the version would have to be on the node11:12
rlandywe have not laid out any repos yet11:13
rlandychandankumar: you guys updated the rhel image version yesterday, right?11:13
rlandy| Label: upstream-rhel-9-011:13
rlandychange there?11:13
* rlandy rekicks failing ovb there in the mean time11:14
chandankumarrlandy: nodeset should be single-rhel-9-node11:16
chandankumarnot upstream-rhel-9-011:16
marios|ruckrlandy: chandankumar: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=208025411:16
marios|ruckjoining review call 11:16
rlandyk11:16
chandankumarrlandy: yes, let me check the last change11:17
*** dviroel|out is now known as dviroel11:21
chandankumarrlandy: https://opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-ansible/src/branch/master/zuul.d/layout.yaml#L2911:23
Tengurlandy: heya! soooo I think the failing ping IS an issue. I'll work with slaweq shortly on that. I really don't see what may cause this issue in the firewall, guess it's somewhere deeper in the network.11:27
rlandychem: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-upgrade/+/836794 - can you review - we are tearing down ussuri - but we need upgrades to sign off on this removal11:39
rlandyTengu: k - let us know when we are ready to review again12:17
chemrlandy: hey, ack, +2, waiting for ci to push it.12:19
chandankumarmarios|ruck: https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/c/testproject/+/405580 testing here to find out which ovs package name is taken there12:25
marios|ruckchandankumar: ack12:25
Tengurlandy: sure.12:26
rlandychem: thanks12:38
*** amoralej is now known as amoralej|lunch12:48
chandankumarrlandy: marios|ruck https://sf.hosted.upshift.rdu2.redhat.com/logs/80/405580/1/check/periodic-tripleo-rhel-9-upload-job-trigger-rhos-17/fe309a7/job-output.txt12:50
chandankumarrlandy: marios|ruck package name is rhosp-openvswitch12:51
chandankumarbut why it is pulling  openvswitch2.15-2.15.012:51
marios|ruckchandankumar: thanks12:51
chandankumarweired12:51
rlandychandankumar: any overrides in downstream?12:51
rlandymaybe we forked that?12:52
marios|ruckchandankumar: rhosp-openswitch resolves to that ... maybe release team will know 12:52
chandankumaropenvswitch : install vars per OS12:52
chandankumargot skipped12:52
chandankumarworth opening a bug and cixing it12:52
chandankumarrlandy: no any overrides used12:52
rlandychandankumar: lon would12:53
marios|ruckchandankumar: we have a bug there https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2080254 12:53
rlandylet's ping lon with that12:53
marios|ruckrlandy: chandankumar: there https://github.com/redhat-openstack/rdoinfo/blob/7abd73cf9fc981c4c789d440948e195909291927/buildsys-tags/cloud9s-openstack-wallaby-testing.yml#L1013-L101512:58
marios|ruckrlandy: chandankumar: ah no.. that is for rdo... maybe we have something similar in downstream then 12:58
chandankumarmarios|ruck: in downstream it comes from rh0s-17 trunk candidate repos12:59
marios|ruckchandankumar: thanks looking at the rhos-delivery chat now12:59
chandankumarmarios|ruck: rlandy setting up, will check stuff in night13:14
rlandychandankumar: k - what are you checking?13:15
rlandyso I know what to pick up13:15
*** amoralej|lunch is now known as amoralej13:32
*** ysandeep|afk is now known as ysandeep13:36
dasm|offo/13:45
*** dasm|off is now known as dasm|ruck13:45
dasm|ruckmarios|ruck: rlandy if you're looking me, i'm here13:46
marios|rucko/ dasm|ruck 13:46
marios|rucklets do a sync in a bit 13:46
dasm|ruckack13:46
marios|ruckdasm|ruck: https://hackmd.io/ITStP2VvSYmxgNVJf56s5w?view13:46
dasm|ruckack13:47
*** pojadhav is now known as pojadhav|afk13:50
* dviroel biab14:05
*** amoralej is now known as amoralej|off14:24
dasm|ruckmarios|ruck: wanna sync up?14:28
marios|ruckrlandy: do you want to join me and dasm|ruck for a sync? if so what time works for you? otherwise me and dasm|ruck can sync in a minute14:28
marios|ruckdasm|ruck: ack lets see if rlandy will join14:28
marios|rucks/will/wants to 14:28
dasm|ruckdoesn't she have a conflict?14:28
dasm|ruckshe dropped for another meeting, right?14:29
marios|ruckdasm|ruck: don't know does she have another call? k didn't realise14:29
dasm|ruckthat's what inderstood when she dropped14:29
dasm|ruckmarios|ruck: https://meet.google.com/qyq-rmrp-gcn14:29
marios|ruckdasm|ruck: k - not too much to hand off so we can do a quick sync whenever you like14:29
marios|ruckdasm|ruck: ack joining14:29
rlandymarios|ruck: have 1-114:31
dasm|ruckack,14:31
marios|ruckrlandy: k no probl can sync after 14:31
dasm|ruckrcastillo: can you check again? https://review.rdoproject.org/r/q/topic:rr_refactor+is:open14:31
rcastillodasm|ruck: sure14:31
*** jgilaber|lunch is now known as jgilaber14:32
marios|ruckcoffee brb14:41
ysandeepdasm|ruck, I have reviewed and +2 all of your open rr refactoring patches, thank you for that work.14:44
ysandeeprlandy:  marios|ruck is ruck/rovering but if dviroel or you want to review and +w those rr patches please go ahead, those patches looks good to go from my side.14:45
dasm|ruckysandeep: thanks!14:46
dviroelack14:46
rlandydasm|ruck: will sync with you after 1-1's14:47
dasm|ruckack14:47
rlandymarios|ruck: dasm|ruck: do you have a plan wrt c8 wallaby?14:47
ysandeeprlandy, could you please +w https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/c/openstack/tripleo-ci-internal-jobs/+/405457 14:48
dasm|ruckhmm... it's in a bad shape indeed: > status=Red last_promotion=2022-04-19 20:43:4314:48
marios|ruckdasm|ruck: rlandy: yeah as discussed earlier was waiting for the run from today to see if we get clear with https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/+/83952614:51
marios|ruckdasm|ruck: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/42352/1#message-cfa6ddce952d7a4d8dbd141a6b35dcee070e491d 14:52
dasm|ruckack14:53
dasm|rucki started: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/testproject/+/4237414:53
dasm|ruckbrb14:54
ysandeepdasm|ruck: fyi.. http://pastebin.test.redhat.com/1048673 - looks like now we are also capturing results in rr script for non periodic jobs, I think we had some logic earlier to only check results/filter for jobs that starts with periodic-, may be we dropped that somewhere during refactoring.. We should fix that in a follow up.14:54
ysandeepdasm|ruck: in this case http://pastebin.test.redhat.com/1048673 , not check results for weirdo or consistent job14:54
dasm|ruckit's not loading for me14:55
dasm|ruckbut is it a problem? we're not showing them in the Cockpit, right?14:55
ysandeepack, let me paste in openstack pastebin.. its not sensitive info14:55
dasm|ruckoh, it's back14:55
dasm|ruckah, i see what you mean14:56
ysandeepdasm|ruck, https://paste.openstack.org/show/bVVkjXD9ykegOou4NnVc/14:56
ysandeepyeah all our periodic job have 'periodic' prefix14:56
dasm|ruckso we should be showing only "periodic" jobs, right?14:56
dasm|ruckit's an easy fix.14:56
ysandeepdasm|ruck: correct14:56
dasm|ruckysandeep: can you give me CLI which you used to get that output?14:57
ysandeepthanks, currently its showing  status=Red last_promotion=2022-04-27 23:26:52, even though all periodic jobs passed14:57
dasm|ruckyeah, that's not right14:58
ysandeeprr --release train --distro centos-714:58
dasm|ruckack14:58
ysandeeprr is just an alias to ruck_rover.py14:58
dasm|ruckack14:58
dasm|ruckyeah, i see it14:58
ysandeepdasm|ruck: thanks, see you on monday o/14:59
dasm|rucki'll address it. thanks ysandeep 14:59
dasm|rucko/14:59
* ysandeep out, have a great weekend everyone :)14:59
dasm|ruckyou too14:59
*** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|out14:59
* dasm|ruck => brb14:59
* dasm|ruck is back15:08
dviroelFYI http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-April/028354.html15:13
dasm|ruckysandeep|out: fyi: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/4237515:16
dasm|ruckdviroel: :( part of the history dies in front of our eyes.15:16
dasm|ruckI get the explanation, but it saddens me15:16
dviroel:(15:17
marios|ruckits like final confirmation that openstack isnt' sexy any more... doesn't even get names now. just a number 15:17
marios|ruckstable/2023.115:17
dasm|ruckthere is a response from Allison: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-April/028356.html15:26
dasm|ruckI agree with that -- names add sexiness :)15:26
marios|ruck;)15:30
dasm|ruckmarios|ruck: wanna score easy merges? https://review.rdoproject.org/r/q/topic:rr_refactor+is:open :)15:33
marios|ruckdasm|ruck: rlandy: starting shutdown sequence let me know if you need something before i go in a bit15:33
dasm|ruckha! :D15:33
marios|ruckdasm|ruck: if you want me to just merge them i can but if you want me to review them then i'll check on monday ;)15:33
marios|ruckup to you 15:34
dasm|ruckmarios|ruck: actually it's up to you. ysandeep|out went over them already and said "lgtm"15:34
marios|ruckdasm|ruck: k15:35
marios|ruckdasm|ruck: (merge party)15:35
dasm|rucknice!15:37
dasm|ruck~o~15:38
marios|ruckdasm|ruck: so since the c8 wallaby line choked today ... probably we should go with https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/42352/1#message-ca75a07a69002b54f492648a5967804b8862b764 rlandy what do you think?15:39
marios|ruckrlandy: if you agree you can merge that and dasm|ruck can you please make sure we revert it as soon as it promotes?15:39
dasm|rucki'm OK with that15:40
dasm|ruckhttps://www.techrepublic.com/article/linux-fedora-project-matthew-miller/15:44
* dviroel lunch15:45
*** dviroel is now known as dviroel|lunch15:45
rlandydasm|ruck: marios|ruck: yep - go with dviroel|lunch's patch15:48
rlandymarios|ruck: dasm|ruck: w+'ing that15:48
rlandypls revert afterwards15:48
marios|ruckrlandy: ack15:48
rlandydasm|ruck: are you on internal??15:49
rlandypls jpin15:49
rlandyjoin15:49
dasm|ruckrlandy: sorry, forgot. joined15:50
marios|rucko/ have a good weekend 15:53
*** marios|ruck is now known as marios|out15:53
chandankumarsee ya!16:00
dasm|rucko/16:01
*** jpena is now known as jpena|off16:30
*** dviroel|lunch is now known as dviroel16:47
dasm|ruckbrb17:05
dasm|ruckback17:18
dasm|ruckdviroel: we're in a bad spot with your change: https://logserver.rdoproject.org/52/42352/1/gate/mol-container_push/68fd363/tox/reports.html17:52
dasm|ruck> ("toomanyrequests: You have reached your pull rate limit. You may increase the limit by authenticating and upgrading: https://www.docker.com/increase-rate-limit")17:52
dasm|rucki don't think rechecking is gonna change anything here :/17:53
dasm|ruckfyi: it's from newest test run17:53
dasm|ruckor maybe? "push_manifests" is green this time17:54
rlandydasm|ruck; where is that?17:59
dviroeldasm|ruck: maybe they reduced the rate limit? not common to see this error so frequently17:59
rlandyyou should be pulling from quay.io17:59
rlandynot docker18:00
dasm|ruckrlandy: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/4235218:00
dasm|rucki'm not sure if we're on quay everywhere already18:00
dasm|ruckdviroel: let's give it another try. results are non-conclusive18:01
rlandyrecheck one last time18:02
dasm|ruckon it18:02
rlandybut those molecule tests need to change18:02
dasm|rucki agree18:02
rlandydasm|ruck: can you check where they are pulling18:02
rlandychange the registry ther18:02
rlandythere18:02
dasm|ruckofc18:02
dasm|ruckdviroel: if i'm seeing this. does it mean i'm using too old hash?18:04
dasm|ruck> {"changed": false, "msg": "The DLRN hash or tag is not recognized. The hash or tag should not contain path slashes."}18:04
dasm|ruckhttps://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/testproject/+/4112818:04
rlandydasm|ruck: that is the hashtag of an aggregrate hash18:08
rlandycomponent jobs need a component hash18:08
rlandycommit _distr hash format18:08
rlandybaremetal-master - component job18:09
dasm|ruckhmm... this is what i got from ruck_rover. Does it mean it's wrong?18:09
dasm|ruckhmmm18:09
rlandyyes18:10
dasm|ruckack18:10
rlandydasm|ruck: also component jobs don;t use force_periodic: true18:11
rlandythey run with current-tripleo18:11
rlandyI mentioned that to ysandeep|out to fix18:11
dasm|rucki must've missed that then18:11
dasm|ruckfs01 and fs35 removed from criteria. kicked off promotion line stable1-cs818:41
dasm|ruckhttps://review.rdoproject.org/zuul/status/change/6830c9bf9da681d189ce90ff1a15dcca238a2e1d18:43
dasm|ruck(-‸ლ)18:43
dasm|ruckthere is still fs01 and fs3518:43
* dviroel going out for weekend - have a great one @team o/18:47
dasm|ruckdviroel: o/ have a good one18:49
rlandydasm|ruck: need help with something?18:52
dasm|ruckrlandy: two things: i'm still trying to run component baremetal and it's not working to me: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/testproject/+/4112818:54
dasm|ruckand i kicked off promo for stable1-cs8 but it semms to be still running with fs01 and fs35 18:54
rlandyhttps://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-jobs/+/42101 is merged18:54
rlandydon't need depends18:54
dasm|ruckyeah, but when i started promo line after that with podman: https://review.rdoproject.org/zuul/status/change/6830c9bf9da681d189ce90ff1a15dcca238a2e1d 18:54
dasm|ruckit still shows both in passing criteria18:55
rlandydasm|ruck: https://meet.google.com/phc-xnqa-zst18:55
dasm|ruckhttps://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/testproject/+/4112819:00
dasm|ruckdistro centos-8 --release wallaby20:19
dasm|ruck status=Yellow last_promotion=2022-04-29 19:49:2820:19
dasm|ruckrlandy: we can merge the revert of cs8 wallaby criterias: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/4124820:19
rlandydasm|ruck, w+'ed = thanks20:20
dasm|ruckk, thx20:20
* rcastillo leaving22:07
rcastillohave a great weekend team o/22:07
dasm|rucko/22:10
rlandyrcastillo: dasm|ruck: have a good weekend22:21
* dasm|ruck calls it a week22:29
*** dasm|ruck is now known as dasm|ruck|off22:30

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!