| @fungicide:matrix.org | probably at least some amount of the work on it would be transferable, i suppose you could at least get started on identifying the correct api calls and whatnot | 00:13 |
|---|---|---|
| -@gerrit:opendev.org- Takashi Kajinami proposed: [zuul/zuul-jobs] 924057: Explicitly install public_suffix 5.1.1 https://review.opendev.org/c/zuul/zuul-jobs/+/924057 | 04:04 | |
| @tristanc_:matrix.org | Speaking of adding new nodepool drivers, we are using a fake kubernetes api called [k1s](https://pagure.io/software-factory/k1s) to run container workload directly with podman using the k8s driver, and I'm wondering if we could do the same for vms through a fake openstack api. The required endpoints for nodepool don't look very difficult to implement for a different backend like hetzner or libvirt. | 13:19 |
| -@gerrit:opendev.org- James E. Blair https://matrix.to/#/@jim:acmegating.com proposed: | 17:15 | |
| - [zuul/nodepool] 924550: Fix cleanup process in AWS tests https://review.opendev.org/c/zuul/nodepool/+/924550 | ||
| - [zuul/nodepool] 924551: Squash: Remove instance parameter from quota methods https://review.opendev.org/c/zuul/nodepool/+/924551 | ||
| - [zuul/nodepool] 924552: Squash: Make a createLaunchTemplates method https://review.opendev.org/c/zuul/nodepool/+/924552 | ||
| - [zuul/nodepool] 924553: Squash: use content-addressible name for launch template https://review.opendev.org/c/zuul/nodepool/+/924553 | ||
| -@gerrit:opendev.org- James E. Blair https://matrix.to/#/@jim:acmegating.com proposed on behalf of Benedikt Löffler: [zuul/nodepool] 923506: Support EC2 Fleet API https://review.opendev.org/c/zuul/nodepool/+/923506 | 17:15 | |
| -@gerrit:opendev.org- James E. Blair https://matrix.to/#/@jim:acmegating.com proposed on behalf of Benedikt Löffler: [zuul/nodepool] 923506: Support EC2 Fleet API https://review.opendev.org/c/zuul/nodepool/+/923506 | 17:16 | |
| @sylvass:albinvass.se | tristanC: interesting | 22:02 |
| @clarkb:matrix.org | > <@tristanc_:matrix.org> Speaking of adding new nodepool drivers, we are using a fake kubernetes api called [k1s](https://pagure.io/software-factory/k1s) to run container workload directly with podman using the k8s driver, and I'm wondering if we could do the same for vms through a fake openstack api. The required endpoints for nodepool don't look very difficult to implement for a different backend like hetzner or libvirt. | 22:23 |
| Why not write a driver for libvirt or hetzner or podman? the driver state machine framework should make that fairly straightforward | ||
| @clarkb:matrix.org | That to me seems less fragile and easier to maintain over time than a weird proxy layer that has to track changes on both sides of it | 22:23 |
| @clarkb:matrix.org | (my main concern would be anyone making changes to the k8s or openstack drivers is unlikely to be aware that you've got a proxy and could very easily break that by adding dependencies on APIs that are not implemented in the proxy) | 22:25 |
| @clarkb:matrix.org | but if you have a driver that implements things directly then updates to zuul/nodepool would be aware that driver also needs updating and you completely sidestep the changes adding dependencies on third party apis | 22:25 |
| @tristanc_:matrix.org | Clark: I find it is easier to develop an external api with a running nodepool service instead of integrating a new sdk/driver directly in nodepool. | 22:38 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!