| -@gerrit:opendev.org- Simon Westphahl proposed: [zuul/zuul] 889173: Only return project cname as safe attribute https://review.opendev.org/c/zuul/zuul/+/889173 | 05:32 | |
| -@gerrit:opendev.org- Simon Westphahl proposed: [zuul/zuul] 891034: dnm: Debug job deduplication https://review.opendev.org/c/zuul/zuul/+/891034 | 13:29 | |
| -@gerrit:opendev.org- James E. Blair https://matrix.to/#/@jim:acmegating.com proposed: [zuul/zuul] 890702: Use tenant-level layout locks https://review.opendev.org/c/zuul/zuul/+/890702 | 15:03 | |
| -@gerrit:opendev.org- Tristan Cacqueray proposed: [zuul/zuul] 891049: Fix syntax error for project that are configured with empty include https://review.opendev.org/c/zuul/zuul/+/891049 | 15:43 | |
| -@gerrit:opendev.org- Tristan Cacqueray proposed: [zuul/zuul] 890209: Update TESTING doc for nox https://review.opendev.org/c/zuul/zuul/+/890209 | 15:43 | |
| -@gerrit:opendev.org- James E. Blair https://matrix.to/#/@jim:acmegating.com proposed: [zuul/zuul] 890702: Use tenant-level layout locks https://review.opendev.org/c/zuul/zuul/+/890702 | 17:54 | |
| @jim:acmegating.com | zuul-maint: I think zuul is about ready for a release. normally we would do 8.4.0, but maybe we should tag it as 9.0.0 due to the python 3.11 requirement. thoughts? | 17:57 |
|---|---|---|
| @jim:acmegating.com | (i think nodepool is almost there too; we should finish the 3.11 work there first) | 17:58 |
| @fungicide:matrix.org | i could get behind zuul 9.0.0 (with python 3.11 for workgroups) | 17:59 |
| @fungicide:matrix.org | and then do nodepool 9.0.0 too, as is our norm | 18:00 |
| @fungicide:matrix.org | corvus: newer ansible requirement too, right? | 18:02 |
| @clarkb:matrix.org | We decided to not bother with 3.10 I guess (wfm) | 18:02 |
| @clarkb:matrix.org | I haven't been able to keep up with general stability of things but other than that issue fungi noticed I think things have been stable with zuul in opendev | 18:02 |
| @fungicide:matrix.org | we've done major version bumps in the past for dropping old ansible version support anyway | 18:03 |
| @jim:acmegating.com | yeah, and i expect that means we'll release 10.0 pretty soon | 18:03 |
| @fungicide:matrix.org | at which point we can start making "this one goes to 11" jokes | 18:03 |
| @jim:acmegating.com | zuul tenant is running with ansible 8, so i think there are no showstoppers there | 18:03 |
| @jim:acmegating.com | (obviously, i expect all of opendev to be running on ansible 8 before we drop ansible 6 in zuul 10) | 18:04 |
| @clarkb:matrix.org | ++ | 18:04 |
| @jim:acmegating.com | i'll continue planning for v9 and getting nodepool in order | 18:05 |
| @jim:acmegating.com | https://review.opendev.org/890355 is the current area of work there | 18:06 |
| @fungicide:matrix.org | thanks! | 18:08 |
| -@gerrit:opendev.org- Tristan Cacqueray proposed: [zuul/zuul] 891049: Fix syntax error for project that are configured with empty include https://review.opendev.org/c/zuul/zuul/+/891049 | 18:19 | |
| -@gerrit:opendev.org- Tristan Cacqueray proposed: [zuul/zuul] 891049: Fix syntax error for project that are configured with empty include https://review.opendev.org/c/zuul/zuul/+/891049 | 19:49 | |
| @tony.breeds:matrix.org | What happens if I have jobs defined with the same name but differing parents: e.g: | 22:06 |
| ```- job: | ||
| name: odd-job | ||
| parent: parent-1 | ||
| - job: | ||
| name: odd-job | ||
| parent: parent-2 | ||
| nodeset: fedora-rawhide | ||
| vars: *rawhide_vars``` | ||
| I'm *guessing* that the first defnintion of odd-job is overridden by the second? | ||
| @tony.breeds:matrix.org | * What happens if I have jobs defined with the same name but differing parents: e.g: | 22:07 |
| ``` | ||
| - job: | ||
| name: odd-job | ||
| parent: parent-1 | ||
| - job: | ||
| name: odd-job | ||
| parent: parent-2 | ||
| nodeset: fedora-rawhide | ||
| vars: *rawhide_vars | ||
| ``` | ||
| I'm *guessing* that the first defnintion of odd-job is overridden by the second? | ||
| @jim:acmegating.com | tony.breeds: nope, it's the super secret multiple inheritance hack :) | 22:07 |
| @jim:acmegating.com | (they both apply) | 22:07 |
| @jim:acmegating.com | you can do some real 🤯 stuff with that. for better or worse. :) | 22:09 |
| @tony.breeds:matrix.org | Oh neat. I shall investigate. | 22:09 |
| @jim:acmegating.com | tony.breeds: a real use case: https://opendev.org/opendev/system-config/src/branch/master/zuul.d/system-config-run.yaml#L34-L36 | 22:11 |
| @jim:acmegating.com | basically, that's doing a sort of "registry consumer mix-in" pattern. | 22:11 |
| @tony.breeds:matrix.org | Oh cool. That might come in very handy. | 22:12 |
| -@gerrit:opendev.org- James E. Blair https://matrix.to/#/@jim:acmegating.com proposed: [zuul/nodepool] 891139: AWS: Add support for retrying image imports https://review.opendev.org/c/zuul/nodepool/+/891139 | 23:01 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!