| @vlotorev:matrix.org | Hi, nodepool static documentation <https://zuul-ci.org/docs/nodepool/static.html#attr-providers.[static].pools> states: | 17:37 |
|---|---|---|
| > When providing different labels, it is better to have one pool per label to avoid requests being queued when one label is at capacity. | ||
| Could you please elaborate on that? | ||
| If I have `centos7` and `centos8` labels should it better locate nodes for these labels in separate pools? | ||
| Otherwise (nodes for both labels in one pool) exhausted `centos7` nodes can block `centos8` nodes from being allocated? | ||
| @clarkb:matrix.org | > <@vlotorev:matrix.org> Hi, nodepool static documentation <https://zuul-ci.org/docs/nodepool/static.html#attr-providers.[static].pools> states: | 17:44 |
| > | ||
| > > When providing different labels, it is better to have one pool per label to avoid requests being queued when one label is at capacity. | ||
| > | ||
| > Could you please elaborate on that? | ||
| > | ||
| > If I have `centos7` and `centos8` labels should it better locate nodes for these labels in separate pools? | ||
| > Otherwise (nodes for both labels in one pool) exhausted `centos7` nodes can block `centos8` nodes from being allocated? | ||
| This is how I read it, but I'm not sure why that is the case. Maybe a driver implementation detail | ||
| @vlotorev:matrix.org | * Hi, nodepool static documentation [https://zuul-ci.org/docs/nodepool/static.html#attr-providers.\[static\].pools](https://zuul-ci.org/docs/nodepool/static.html#attr-providers.%5Bstatic%5D.pools) states: | 17:51 |
| > When providing different labels, it is better to have one pool per label to avoid requests being queued when one label is at capacity. | ||
| Could you please elaborate on that? | ||
| If I have `centos7` and `centos8` labels should it be better to locate nodes for these labels in separate pools? | ||
| Otherwise (nodes for both labels in one pool) exhausted `centos7` nodes can block `centos8` nodes from being allocated? | ||
| -@gerrit:opendev.org- lotorev vitaly proposed: [zuul/zuul] 833514: Switch to 8005 nodepool webapp port in doc/example https://review.opendev.org/c/zuul/zuul/+/833514 | 19:18 | |
| -@gerrit:opendev.org- lotorev vitaly marked as active: [zuul/zuul] 833514: Switch to 8005 nodepool webapp port in doc/example https://review.opendev.org/c/zuul/zuul/+/833514 | 19:20 | |
| -@gerrit:opendev.org- lotorev vitaly proposed: [zuul/zuul] 833514: Switch to 8005 nodepool webapp port in example docs https://review.opendev.org/c/zuul/zuul/+/833514 | 19:21 | |
| -@gerrit:opendev.org- lotorev vitaly proposed: [zuul/nodepool] 833515: Log hostname on socket.getaddrinfo() exception https://review.opendev.org/c/zuul/nodepool/+/833515 | 20:31 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!