Friday, 2017-01-20

*** piccobit has quit IRC00:11
*** piccobit has joined #zuul00:19
*** saneax-_-|AFK is now known as saneax01:43
*** saneax is now known as saneax-_-|AFK03:24
*** saneax-_-|AFK is now known as saneax03:55
*** timrc has quit IRC05:34
*** timrc has joined #zuul05:35
*** bhavik1 has joined #zuul05:38
piccobitjeblair: That's really a pity because I was praising Zuul together with Jenkins pipelines as our ultimate new build system. Ok, I'll take s look at the Gearman plugin, maybe it can be extended to support also the pipelines.05:39
*** bhavik1 has quit IRC05:47
*** hashar has joined #zuul09:02
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC09:02
*** tflink has quit IRC09:03
*** tflink has joined #zuul09:04
*** bhavik1 has joined #zuul09:28
*** bhavik1 has quit IRC09:30
*** saneax is now known as saneax-_-|AFK10:31
*** hashar is now known as hasharAway11:15
*** saneax-_-|AFK is now known as saneax12:02
*** hasharAway is now known as hashar12:51
*** yolanda has quit IRC13:01
*** yolanda has joined #zuul13:02
jeblairpiccobit: can you describe how you want to use jenkins pipelines with zuul?13:35
jeblairpiccobit: zuul v2 has the ability to specify a tree of jobs, and there's work in progress for v3 to let you specify a graph, so i'm wondering if that would cover your use case, or if there's something else we should be looking at.13:44
*** openstackgerrit has joined #zuul13:44
openstackgerritJames E. Blair proposed openstack-infra/zuul: Separate driver interfaces and make abstract  https://review.openstack.org/41855413:44
openstackgerritJames E. Blair proposed openstack-infra/zuul: Add Drivers to documentation  https://review.openstack.org/42280413:45
openstackgerritJames E. Blair proposed openstack-infra/zuul: Re-enable zuultrigger test  https://review.openstack.org/40884813:45
openstackgerritJames E. Blair proposed openstack-infra/zuul: Reorganize connections into drivers  https://review.openstack.org/40884913:45
Shrewsjeblair: you are up waaay too early for a west coaster13:55
jeblairShrews: i hear that's the only way to get things done :)14:07
Shrewsheh14:07
Shrewsjeblair: Since you're up... wondering how to handle node assignment. Should we lock _available_ nodes BEFORE we launch more nodes to handle the request? Doing so makes sure we have them when the launched nodes are ready, but also means they aren't available for other requests, and we'd have to have some sort of retry mechanism in place around the availability checks.14:12
Shrews(this is the edge case where, say, a request needs 2 nodes, but only 1 is available)14:13
Shrewsi'm thinking going ahead and locking (err, marking as 'in-use') is the safest thing14:15
Shrewsok, i actually just talked myself into just doing that by typing all that out14:17
*** saneax is now known as saneax-_-|AFK14:18
jeblairShrews: yeah, let's give that a shot (though, don't set the state to in-use -- just lock it -- if our launcher changes its mind (or dies) it should just unlock and still be in the ready state for someone else to pick up)14:19
Shrewsok. i think the have the algorithm worked out now14:38
*** herlo has quit IRC14:54
*** bhavik1 has joined #zuul16:27
*** bhavik1 has quit IRC16:41
*** hashar has quit IRC18:18
openstackgerritDavid Shrewsbury proposed openstack-infra/nodepool: Add a serialize() method to ZK model definitions  https://review.openstack.org/42340418:23
Shrewsclarkb: ^^^ in reference to a comment i think you had made on another review18:24
mordredShrews: I like that19:15
openstackgerritDavid Shrewsbury proposed openstack-infra/nodepool: Add API methods for locking/unlocking Nodes.  https://review.openstack.org/42349619:28
openstackgerritDavid Shrewsbury proposed openstack-infra/nodepool: WIP: Assign node set to node requests  https://review.openstack.org/42350219:48
*** jamielennox is now known as jamielennox|away21:28
jeblair2017-01-20 14:40:39,414 zuul.LaunchServer                DEBUG    Ansible output: PLAY RECAP *********************************************************************22:41
jeblair2017-01-20 14:40:39,414 zuul.LaunchServer                DEBUG    Ansible output: localhost                  : ok=1    changed=1    unreachable=0    failed=022:41
jeblairi had to share that -- it brought me a smile -- the first time zuul v3 ran a playbook defined in a project repo :)22:42
openstackgerritJames E. Blair proposed openstack-infra/zuul: Use playbooks defined in repos  https://review.openstack.org/42355023:17
openstackgerritJames E. Blair proposed openstack-infra/zuul: Use playbooks defined in repos  https://review.openstack.org/42355023:19
jeblairmordred, jlk, pabelanger, clarkb, jhesketh: ^ things are starting to get real; let's bang on that next week :)23:21
clarkbsounds good. I will be afk monday though. Last minute fishing trip23:21
jeblairclarkb: don't fall through the ice23:22
openstackgerritJames E. Blair proposed openstack-infra/zuul: Use playbooks defined in repos  https://review.openstack.org/42355023:32

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!