| *** yifei has joined #tacker | 00:18 | |
| *** bobh has quit IRC | 00:21 | |
| *** bobh has joined #tacker | 00:25 | |
| *** bobh has quit IRC | 00:29 | |
| openstackgerrit | gongysh proposed openstack/tacker master: Move to zuul3 jobs https://review.openstack.org/516004 | 00:46 |
|---|---|---|
| *** yifei has left #tacker | 00:52 | |
| openstackgerrit | MinWookKim proposed openstack/tacker master: Zabbix Plugin for Application Monitoring in Tacker VNF Manager https://review.openstack.org/516892 | 01:27 |
| openstackgerrit | OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/tacker master: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/517504 | 01:40 |
| *** Jeffrey4l has quit IRC | 02:26 | |
| *** Jeffrey4l has joined #tacker | 02:29 | |
| *** yifei has joined #tacker | 04:14 | |
| *** gongysh has joined #tacker | 04:17 | |
| gongysh | dkushwaha, tbh, phuoc_ if you are ok, please review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/516004/ | 04:18 |
| gongysh | which at last works. | 04:18 |
| gongysh | we need it get merged, otherwise other patches will not be verified. | 04:19 |
| openstackgerrit | MinWookKim proposed openstack/tacker master: Zabbix Plugin for Application Monitoring in Tacker VNF Manager https://review.openstack.org/516892 | 04:25 |
| *** yifei has quit IRC | 04:28 | |
| *** diga has joined #tacker | 04:40 | |
| *** yifei has joined #tacker | 05:05 | |
| *** janki has joined #tacker | 05:08 | |
| *** yifei has quit IRC | 05:09 | |
| tbh | gongysh, sure | 06:15 |
| phuoc_ | gongysh, and about https://review.openstack.org/#/c/509687/9 | 07:01 |
| phuoc_ | do you have plan to apply it ? | 07:01 |
| gongysh | no | 07:05 |
| *** egonzalez has joined #tacker | 07:05 | |
| openstackgerrit | MinWookKim proposed openstack/tacker master: Zabbix Plugin for Application Monitoring in Tacker VNF Manager https://review.openstack.org/516892 | 07:07 |
| *** trinaths has joined #tacker | 07:10 | |
| *** trinaths1 has joined #tacker | 07:12 | |
| *** trinaths has quit IRC | 07:14 | |
| openstackgerrit | Dimitrios Markou proposed openstack/tacker master: [Bug-Fix] Add support for multiple classifiers per chain https://review.openstack.org/511448 | 07:47 |
| *** trinaths1 has left #tacker | 07:54 | |
| *** ykarel has joined #tacker | 08:00 | |
| ykarel | gongysh, hi | 08:03 |
| gongysh | hi | 08:03 |
| ykarel | gongysh, just curious to know how did you solved the plugin order in: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/516004/ | 08:03 |
| gongysh | not fix, just to change my devstack script | 08:04 |
| gongysh | so my build process: devstack stack.sh, and then do setup after it. | 08:04 |
| gongysh | previously, we will do set up in our tacker devstack script. | 08:05 |
| ykarel | gongysh, Ok, Thanks | 08:06 |
| gongysh | ykarel, you are welcome | 08:09 |
| *** egonzalez has quit IRC | 08:10 | |
| *** ykarel is now known as ykarel|lunch | 08:15 | |
| *** egonzalez has joined #tacker | 08:26 | |
| phuoc_ | mardim, hi | 08:44 |
| phuoc_ | I am sorry, because I have a class tonight | 08:44 |
| phuoc_ | I will reply you soon :) | 08:44 |
| mardim | phuoc_, Yes no problem don't be sorry :) | 08:46 |
| mardim | phuoc_, Thanks for reviewing it anyway :) | 08:47 |
| *** diga has quit IRC | 08:59 | |
| *** ykarel|lunch is now known as ykarel | 09:12 | |
| *** ykarel is now known as ykarel|session | 09:32 | |
| openstackgerrit | MinWookKim proposed openstack/tacker master: Zabbix Plugin for Application Monitoring in Tacker VNF Manager https://review.openstack.org/516892 | 09:49 |
| *** MinWookKim has quit IRC | 09:52 | |
| *** links has quit IRC | 09:58 | |
| *** gongysh has quit IRC | 10:06 | |
| *** daidv has quit IRC | 10:10 | |
| openstackgerrit | Digambar proposed openstack/tacker-specs master: Implement containerized VNF in Kubernetes VIM https://review.openstack.org/511991 | 10:13 |
| openstackgerrit | Dimitrios Markou proposed openstack/tacker master: [Bug-Fix] Add support for multiple classifiers per chain https://review.openstack.org/511448 | 11:19 |
| *** janki has quit IRC | 11:45 | |
| *** ykarel|session is now known as ykarel | 12:09 | |
| *** janki has joined #tacker | 12:18 | |
| *** Dinesh_Bhor has quit IRC | 13:08 | |
| *** trinaths has joined #tacker | 13:46 | |
| *** trinaths has left #tacker | 13:47 | |
| *** bobh has joined #tacker | 13:50 | |
| *** ykarel is now known as ykarel|away | 13:58 | |
| *** egonzalez has quit IRC | 13:59 | |
| phuoc_ | hi mardim | 14:01 |
| phuoc_ | are you there? | 14:01 |
| mardim | hi phuoc_ yes tell me | 14:02 |
| phuoc_ | Can I change a little bit in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/511448/ ? | 14:02 |
| mardim | phuoc_, Yes sure no problem | 14:03 |
| mardim | phuoc_, But I should warn you that this patch is tested | 14:03 |
| phuoc_ | mardim, I only update the docs :) | 14:03 |
| mardim | phuoc_, And is working | 14:03 |
| phuoc_ | sure | 14:03 |
| phuoc_ | I also tested it too | 14:04 |
| mardim | phuoc_, Ah ok sure :) | 14:04 |
| phuoc_ | Look good to me | 14:04 |
| mardim | phuoc_, oh didn't know that thanks for that :) | 14:04 |
| *** ykarel|away has quit IRC | 14:05 | |
| openstackgerrit | Cong Phuoc Hoang proposed openstack/tacker master: [Bug-Fix] Add support for multiple classifiers per chain https://review.openstack.org/511448 | 14:29 |
| *** janki has quit IRC | 15:20 | |
| *** janki has joined #tacker | 15:21 | |
| *** janki has quit IRC | 15:22 | |
| *** links has joined #tacker | 15:35 | |
| *** nguyentrihai has joined #tacker | 15:36 | |
| mardim | phuoc_, here ? | 15:37 |
| phuoc_ | I am here :) | 15:38 |
| mardim | phuoc_, how tacker will understand to delete a classifier when the user will pass the classifier.yml | 15:38 |
| mardim | phuoc_, sorry but I cannot understnd | 15:39 |
| *** ykarel|away has joined #tacker | 15:39 | |
| mardim | phuoc_, what do you mean here 'User can add a new fc by adding some definition, delete a fc by deleting it' ? | 15:39 |
| phuoc_ | We only delete all information about that flow classifier in this file | 15:40 |
| phuoc_ | and run updating vnffg | 15:40 |
| phuoc_ | In the code side, we should check what fc is missed, so Tacker will remove that fc | 15:41 |
| mardim | phuoc_, So you mean that we should decide if the classifier in that file should be removed or added or updated | 15:42 |
| mardim | ? | 15:42 |
| mardim | phuoc_, through tacker code \ | 15:42 |
| mardim | ? | 15:42 |
| phuoc_ | that's right | 15:42 |
| mardim | phuoc_, hmm now I understnd what you are saying | 15:42 |
| mardim | phuoc_, hmm not a bad idea let me update the spec | 15:43 |
| mardim | :) | 15:43 |
| phuoc_ | thank :) | 15:43 |
| mardim | phuoc_,hmm but this is only when we have multiple classifier support right ? | 15:45 |
| phuoc_ | mardim, you're right | 15:46 |
| phuoc_ | when Tacker support multiple classifier | 15:46 |
| mardim | phuoc_, But when we will have multiple classifier support we need to name the classifiers so we can distinguish them somehow | 15:46 |
| mardim | phuoc_, So the use needs to name also the classifiers to the flowclassifier.yml file | 15:47 |
| mardim | right | 15:47 |
| mardim | ? | 15:47 |
| phuoc_ | Yes, name should be added in the flowclassifier.yml file | 15:48 |
| mardim | phuoc_, ok I will update the spec | 15:48 |
| phuoc_ | mardim, I have one thing I want to ask | 15:55 |
| mardim | phuoc_, tell me | 15:55 |
| phuoc_ | I think it will be better if we can update the path | 15:56 |
| phuoc_ | :) | 15:56 |
| mardim | we did this already | 15:56 |
| mardim | phuoc_, ^ | 15:56 |
| mardim | phuoc_, the update the path functionality already exists in the tackerclient | 15:57 |
| mardim | phuoc_, through the vnf-mapping | 15:57 |
| phuoc_ | mardim, it is 1 use case | 15:59 |
| mardim | phuoc_, what are you thinking ? | 15:59 |
| phuoc_ | example, the path from VNF1 to VNF2 | 15:59 |
| phuoc_ | sometime, user want to add VNF3 to the path | 16:00 |
| phuoc_ | example: VNF1 --> VNF3 --> VNF2 | 16:00 |
| phuoc_ | mardim, is it possible? | 16:00 |
| mardim | phuoc_, hmm I do not know then he needs to create a new vnffg | 16:01 |
| mardim | phuoc_, it will become too complicated | 16:01 |
| mardim | phuoc_, it is logical what you are saying | 16:02 |
| mardim | phuoc_, but I am not sure if we want to do this through the update command | 16:02 |
| mardim | phuoc_, because it becomes two complicated | 16:02 |
| mardim | too* | 16:02 |
| phuoc_ | mardim, I see :) | 16:02 |
| mardim | phuoc_, Mybe we can create another parameter to the tackerclient for that purpose | 16:03 |
| mardim | phuoc_, but what will happen if he wants to also update the vnf-mapping to that new vnf3 | 16:03 |
| mardim | phuoc_, the things become too complicated | 16:04 |
| mardim | phuoc_, Maybe we should discuss this in the meeting | 16:04 |
| mardim | phuoc_, what do you think ? | 16:04 |
| phuoc_ | sure | 16:04 |
| phuoc_ | I also have to prepare 1 scenario about vnffg next month :) | 16:06 |
| mardim | phuoc_, which one | 16:06 |
| mardim | ? | 16:06 |
| phuoc_ | mardim, do you have some suggestion for me :) | 16:06 |
| mardim | why do you nee to prepare a scenario ? | 16:07 |
| mardim | phuoc_, ^ | 16:07 |
| mardim | need* | 16:07 |
| phuoc_ | to show to my boss :) | 16:07 |
| mardim | phuoc_, what do you have in mind? | 16:08 |
| mardim | phuoc_, If you give me the big picture | 16:08 |
| mardim | phuoc_, maybe I can think something | 16:08 |
| phuoc_ | mardim, I think about making a chain between some VNFs | 16:09 |
| phuoc_ | VNFs can be Firewall, IMS, etc | 16:09 |
| mardim | phuoc_, You can create a client and a server | 16:10 |
| mardim | phuoc_, and you can create two chains | 16:10 |
| mardim | phuoc_, and youcan just create a classifier for the first cahin and show to your boss that if you ping the traffic goes from the first chain to the server | 16:11 |
| mardim | phuoc_, And after that delete the first classifier (or update it) | 16:11 |
| mardim | phuoc_, and create a new one which forwrds the traffic throught the second chain | 16:12 |
| phuoc_ | mardim, it can be a good scenario | 16:12 |
| mardim | phuoc_, :) | 16:12 |
| phuoc_ | maybe in server, I will run a application | 16:13 |
| mardim | you can run an http_server | 16:14 |
| phuoc_ | because I am not working with real system before, so I will check and clone some source code to do it :) | 16:14 |
| mardim | yes sure | 16:14 |
| mardim | you can run an http_server | 16:14 |
| mardim | and in the client you can netcat so you have http traffic | 16:14 |
| phuoc_ | I will look at OPNFV sfc document :) | 16:15 |
| mardim | phuoc_, Yes take a look we do something similar there | 16:16 |
| phuoc_ | Hope the vnffg-update will work :) | 16:16 |
| *** ykarel|away has quit IRC | 16:16 | |
| mardim | phuoc_, it will when the times comes ;) | 16:17 |
| openstackgerrit | Cong Phuoc Hoang proposed openstack/tacker-specs master: Implement containerized VNF in Kubernetes VIM https://review.openstack.org/511991 | 16:54 |
| *** links has quit IRC | 16:55 | |
| *** ykarel|away has joined #tacker | 17:24 | |
| *** ykarel|away has quit IRC | 17:49 | |
| *** s3wong has joined #tacker | 18:00 | |
| *** s3wong has quit IRC | 18:00 | |
| *** bobmel has quit IRC | 18:04 | |
| *** bobh has quit IRC | 22:47 | |
| *** links has joined #tacker | 23:32 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!