*** kurahashi has joined #tacker | 00:05 | |
*** elo has joined #tacker | 00:06 | |
*** prashantD_ has joined #tacker | 00:08 | |
*** prashantD_ has left #tacker | 00:12 | |
*** prashantD_ has joined #tacker | 00:12 | |
*** lsp42 has joined #tacker | 00:13 | |
*** s3wong has joined #tacker | 00:15 | |
*** openstackgerrit has joined #tacker | 00:15 | |
*** lhcheng has joined #tacker | 00:15 | |
*** vishwanathj has joined #tacker | 00:15 | |
*** sarob has joined #tacker | 00:15 | |
*** bobh has joined #tacker | 00:15 | |
*** bobh has quit IRC | 00:19 | |
*** lhcheng has quit IRC | 01:08 | |
*** sridhar_ram has joined #tacker | 01:12 | |
*** sridhar_ram1 has joined #tacker | 01:15 | |
*** sridhar_ram has quit IRC | 01:17 | |
*** s3wong has quit IRC | 01:41 | |
*** kurahashi has quit IRC | 01:51 | |
*** sridhar_ram1 has quit IRC | 02:07 | |
*** tbh has joined #tacker | 02:08 | |
tbh | vishwanathj: Hi | 02:10 |
---|---|---|
tbh | vishwanathj: I have installed sshpass on my system | 02:10 |
*** tbh has quit IRC | 02:28 | |
*** lhcheng has joined #tacker | 02:30 | |
*** prashantD_ has quit IRC | 02:48 | |
*** tbh has joined #tacker | 05:02 | |
*** lhcheng has quit IRC | 05:04 | |
*** lhcheng has joined #tacker | 05:21 | |
*** tbh has quit IRC | 05:22 | |
*** tbh has joined #tacker | 05:24 | |
*** tbh has quit IRC | 08:09 | |
*** tbh has joined #tacker | 08:10 | |
*** lhcheng has quit IRC | 08:58 | |
*** tbh has quit IRC | 09:28 | |
*** tbh has joined #tacker | 09:29 | |
*** ilozgach has joined #tacker | 09:33 | |
ilozgach | Hello! | 09:35 |
ilozgach | I'm new in tacker. Can anyone answer some of my questions? | 09:35 |
ilozgach | I'm able to deploy VNF using sample-vnfd.yaml | 09:36 |
ilozgach | How to connect to runned instance? | 09:37 |
tbh | ilozgach: Hi | 09:38 |
tbh | ilozgach: I will try to help | 09:38 |
ilozgach | {"vdu1": "192.168.120.3"} | 09:38 |
ilozgach | Thanks ) | 09:38 |
*** tbh_ has joined #tacker | 09:38 | |
ilozgach | I want to connect via ssh | 09:38 |
tbh_ | ilozgach, sorry I lost the connection | 09:38 |
ilozgach | Well, I'm trying to understand how to connect to the instance using ssh | 09:39 |
ilozgach | I have management ip | 09:39 |
ilozgach | {"vdu1": "192.168.120.3"} | 09:39 |
ilozgach | Do I need use keypair or smth else? | 09:40 |
tbh_ | ilozgach, no, you can directly ssh to instance using mgmt IP | 09:41 |
tbh_ | ilozgach, can you able to ping? | 09:42 |
ilozgach | But what is login and password? :) I was trying to google for it but nothing found | 09:42 |
tbh_ | ilozgach, which instance are you using? | 09:42 |
*** tbh has quit IRC | 09:42 | |
tbh_ | ilozgach, is it cirros? | 09:43 |
ilozgach | cirros-0.3.4-x86_64-uec | 09:43 |
tbh_ | ilozgach, username : cirros password: cubswin:) | 09:43 |
tbh_ | ilozgach, with smiley | 09:43 |
ilozgach | It worked! :) | 09:44 |
ilozgach | Thanks a lot | 09:44 |
tbh_ | ilozgach, cool! | 09:44 |
tbh_ | np | 09:44 |
ilozgach | One more question | 09:44 |
ilozgach | Is there any documentation regarding next question: | 09:44 |
ilozgach | "How user metadata is passed to the instance?" | 09:45 |
ilozgach | I mean | 09:45 |
ilozgach | I want to add some user matadata <key,value> | 09:45 |
ilozgach | Into yaml config | 09:45 |
ilozgach | And I want that some application in my VNF will read this metadata and use it | 09:46 |
ilozgach | At the startup | 09:46 |
tbh_ | ilozgach, generally we use --config-file option to do that | 09:46 |
tbh_ | ilozgach, we have VNF descriptors for openwrt | 09:47 |
tbh_ | ilozgach, using https://github.com/stackforge/tacker/blob/master/devstack/samples/config-openwrt-with-firewall.yaml file you can configure | 09:47 |
tbh_ | ilozgach, or you can try this https://github.com/stackforge/tacker/blob/master/devstack/samples/vnf_cirros_param_values_user_data.yaml | 09:48 |
tbh_ | ilozgach, where user data is the section, where you can pass your commands to run on instance on start up | 09:49 |
ilozgach | Many thanks! :) | 09:49 |
ilozgach | I'll check that | 09:49 |
tbh_ | ilozgach, sure | 09:49 |
tbh_ | ilozgach, nice to see people talking in this time zone :) | 09:51 |
ilozgach | :) I have Moscow time (GMT +3) | 09:52 |
tbh_ | oh nice | 09:52 |
ilozgach | By the way | 09:53 |
ilozgach | "tacker help" | 09:53 |
ilozgach | Do not show "--config-file" option | 09:54 |
ilozgach | Or did you mean "config include" section in yaml? | 09:54 |
tbh_ | ilozgach, check this tacker vnf-create --help or tacker vnf-update --help | 09:55 |
ilozgach | Aha! I see | 09:56 |
ilozgach | So, If I specify config file | 09:57 |
ilozgach | Will it be uploaded to the instance? | 09:57 |
tbh_ | ilozgach, no, it will configure | 09:57 |
ilozgach | Ok | 09:57 |
tbh_ | ilozgach, for better understanding watch this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T10TjbJkFYw | 09:58 |
ilozgach | Ok, thanks for a help :) | 10:07 |
*** damosov has joined #tacker | 10:29 | |
*** damosov has left #tacker | 10:32 | |
*** damosov has joined #tacker | 10:36 | |
damosov | Hello guys! Could you please advise if there is any official way to install tacker without using devstack? We'd like to find the procedure close to the official openstack installation guide. Are there any impediments in it? | 10:49 |
*** manikanta_ has joined #tacker | 11:12 | |
*** tbh_ has quit IRC | 12:16 | |
*** bobh has joined #tacker | 12:33 | |
*** bobh has quit IRC | 12:43 | |
*** ilozgach has quit IRC | 12:55 | |
*** manikanta_ has quit IRC | 13:21 | |
*** bobh has joined #tacker | 13:49 | |
*** trozet has joined #tacker | 14:05 | |
*** tbh has joined #tacker | 15:10 | |
*** sripriya has joined #tacker | 15:58 | |
*** sripriya_ has joined #tacker | 16:13 | |
*** tbh has quit IRC | 16:16 | |
*** tbh has joined #tacker | 16:17 | |
*** sripriya has quit IRC | 16:17 | |
*** lhcheng has joined #tacker | 16:19 | |
*** sripriya_ has quit IRC | 16:21 | |
*** sripriya has joined #tacker | 16:40 | |
*** prashantD has joined #tacker | 16:43 | |
sripriya | tbh: hello | 16:45 |
tbh | sripriya, Hi | 16:45 |
tbh | sripriya, trying to push patch for https://bugs.launchpad.net/tacker/+bug/1506111 | 16:46 |
openstack | Launchpad bug 1506111 in tacker "Unable to configure VDU using openwrt mgmt driver" [Undecided,New] - Assigned to bharaththiruveedula (bharath-ves) | 16:46 |
tbh | sripriya, can you please review it? | 16:46 |
sripriya | tbh: qq, on our discussion yest. in the vnf-create with config scenario it returns after hitting L72 | 16:46 |
sripriya | tbh: the same logic works for vnf-update with config scenario | 16:47 |
tbh | sripriya, l72 of ? | 16:47 |
sripriya | tbh: of openwrt.py | 16:47 |
sripriya | tbh: did you try the vnf-update scenario? | 16:49 |
tbh | sripriya, no I haven't tried with vnf-update | 16:49 |
tbh | sripriya, is it working with vnf-update? | 16:50 |
sripriya | tbh: yes, i need to personally test which is what i'm doign right now | 16:50 |
sripriya | doing* | 16:50 |
tbh | sripriya, yes it is hitting | 16:56 |
sripriya | tbh:can you explain? | 16:56 |
tbh | sripriya, even with vnf-update, it hits https://github.com/stackforge/tacker/blob/master/tacker/vm/mgmt_drivers/openwrt/openwrt.py#L72 and returns | 16:57 |
openstackgerrit | bharaththiruveedula proposed stackforge/tacker: Check service_type per VDU for openwrt mgmt driver https://review.openstack.org/236014 | 17:03 |
tbh | sripriya, as per the discussion in the morning, I have pushed the patch | 17:04 |
sripriya | tbh: thanks for confirming, i will look into the patchset | 17:05 |
tbh | sripriya, thanks | 17:06 |
sripriya | tbh: last week, as i recall you had mentioned vnf-create with config was working on openwrt and you were able to see the config on the instance? trying to understand... | 17:06 |
tbh | sripriya, yeah last week it was working,but .. | 17:08 |
tbh | sripriya, but due to this https://github.com/stackforge/tacker/commit/e638da6e9a3e576c9ee718890ad1f78c0c359334#diff-8a299de9a9f71eabe41136e71b813a7fR299 | 17:09 |
tbh | sripriya, it was not working, because when you iterate through ('service_type') it will give 's', 'e','r' .. | 17:10 |
tbh | sripriya, so that's why I pushed this change https://github.com/stackforge/tacker/commit/d1312149b191d7bc4c88026621627eb82ba32f10 | 17:11 |
tbh | sripriya, and now you will service_type in device dictionary but per VDU level for example .. | 17:12 |
sripriya | tbh: makes sense! | 17:13 |
sripriya | tbh: thanks for clarifying | 17:13 |
tbh | sripriya, :) | 17:14 |
sripriya | tbh: did you try the patch with vnf-update too? | 17:15 |
*** s3wong has joined #tacker | 17:15 | |
tbh | sripriya, we can do this in one patch, but in future if someone looks at commits, we must differentiate the purpose of each commit | 17:15 |
tbh | sripriya, so I made it into two patched | 17:15 |
tbh | sripriya, yeah I have tested with vnf-update also just now before pushing | 17:16 |
sripriya | tbh: cool! thanks | 17:17 |
tbh | sripriya, I am facing this error frequently https://bugs.launchpad.net/tacker/+bug/1505468 | 17:19 |
openstack | Launchpad bug 1505468 in tacker "Error status after creating a vnf - TypeError: <type 'NoneType'> can't be decoded" [Undecided,New] | 17:19 |
tbh | sripriya, but continuously | 17:19 |
tbh | *but not | 17:19 |
tbh | sripriya, I have a question | 17:22 |
tbh | sripriya, moving from stackforge to openstack namespace is same as adding to openstack governance tent? | 17:22 |
bobh | tbh: No - not the same thing. Governance is still a separate process | 17:23 |
tbh | bobh, oh okay, I remember sridhar_ram saying we are moving to governance tent in yesterday meeting | 17:24 |
tbh | bobh, I think we have to raise a patch for that too I guess, is that correct? | 17:24 |
bobh | tbh: I'm not familiar with the formal process, but I know the namespace changes were unrelated to changes in governance. The powers-that-be want to shutdown the stackforge namespace and cosolidate under the openstack namespace | 17:25 |
tbh | bobh, got it | 17:26 |
*** sripriya_ has joined #tacker | 17:26 | |
*** sripriya__ has joined #tacker | 17:27 | |
*** sripriya has quit IRC | 17:30 | |
*** sripriya_ has quit IRC | 17:31 | |
*** sripriya__ has quit IRC | 17:32 | |
*** trozet has quit IRC | 17:45 | |
*** sridhar_ram has joined #tacker | 17:46 | |
*** sripriya has joined #tacker | 17:49 | |
sripriya | tbh: in what scenario are you facing the error? | 17:54 |
tbh | sripriya, when ever I try to vnf either using dashboard or using vnf-create command | 17:55 |
sripriya | tbh: are you able to see why heat did not go to CREATE_COMPLETE in h-api.log? | 17:55 |
sripriya | tbh: this error is thrown from the monitor code as mgmt_url is None which implies VM did not get created at all, ona different node, we need a way to handle the error gracefully whenever heat stack create fails and not allow it to go further down to monitor code to run with a None mgmt_url | 17:58 |
sridhar_ram | s3wong: sripriya: can you add this one to your review q - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/235062/ ? | 17:59 |
sridhar_ram | s3wong: sripriya: it is one of those no harm patchsets | 17:59 |
sripriya | sridhar_ram: done | 17:59 |
*** trozet has joined #tacker | 17:59 | |
s3wong | sridhar_ram: why do we have extension APIs? | 17:59 |
*** sripriya_ has joined #tacker | 18:00 | |
*** sridhar_ram1 has joined #tacker | 18:01 | |
s3wong | two sridhar_ram :-) | 18:02 |
tbh | sripriya_, yeah but I was wondering what might be case where the instance fails? | 18:02 |
tbh | sripriya_, now I am not getting those erros to actually inspect it | 18:02 |
sripriya_ | tbh: did the n-cpu.log provide any clue? | 18:03 |
*** sridhar_ram has quit IRC | 18:03 | |
tbh | sripriya_, no | 18:03 |
*** sripriya has quit IRC | 18:04 | |
tbh | sripriya_, I will try to reproduce it again | 18:04 |
sripriya_ | tbh: sure | 18:05 |
tbh | sripriya_, caught it | 18:07 |
tbh | sripriya_, Build of instance 581140f1-b18f-4629-adbd-19a6fd28cc70 was re-scheduled: Unable to create tap device tapa15d9ecf-84: Device or resource busy\n' | 18:07 |
sripriya_ | tbh: can you 'noop' the monitoring policy and retry? | 18:09 |
tbh | sripriya_, libvirtError: Unable to create tap device tap5090d6b9-a7: Device or resource busy | 18:16 |
tbh | sripriya_, got some work for weekend :) | 18:18 |
sripriya_ | tbh: is the monitoring enabled in this case? did this error hit when respawn happened? or is it even before that? | 18:19 |
sridhar_ram1 | s3wong: sorry, got disconnect.. api_extension is still relevant for Tacker as it is for Neutron. so left it as is | 18:21 |
s3wong | sridhar_ram1: yeah, I was wondering what part of our APIs is considered "extension APIs" | 18:22 |
tbh | sripriya_, no, checked with sample-vnfd.yaml | 18:22 |
sridhar_ram1 | s3wong: the part desc in tacker/extensions/vnfm.py | 18:23 |
sripriya_ | tbh: hmmm | 18:24 |
sripriya_ | tbh: this is something we observed on the gate too on an intermittent basis | 18:25 |
*** sridhar_ram1 has quit IRC | 18:25 | |
*** bobh has quit IRC | 18:29 | |
*** sridhar_ram has joined #tacker | 18:36 | |
sridhar_ram | s3wong: was multitasking.. the our api framework has multiple layers .. described in api_layer.rst. Extenstion framework is one aspect of our API layer. | 18:40 |
sridhar_ram | s3wong: again, nothing new from tacker here... just leveraging neutron / other openstack project's extension + plugin design pattern | 18:41 |
sridhar_ram | damosov: Hi there.. | 18:41 |
s3wong | sridhar_ram: I can see the intent --- if Tacker is to become a higher level entity (like NFVO), then one can make argument that support of VNFM is just optional, I guess | 18:42 |
sridhar_ram | damosov: we currently don't have separate installation packages for tacker components.. | 18:42 |
sridhar_ram | damosov: this is something we are working for the liberty release ... to push tacker pkg to pypi | 18:42 |
sripriya_ | tbh: can you share your n-cpu.log and q-agt.logs? | 18:43 |
sridhar_ram | damosov: which distro are you planning to use for your openstack ? | 18:43 |
sridhar_ram | s3wong: yes, general best practice to introduce our feature set in a modular way... the benefit is there for someone who want to write a different implementation of VNFM but use the same Tacker API | 18:45 |
tbh | sripriya_, trying for that, all successful deployments till now | 18:52 |
sripriya_ | tbh: this looks like a race condition between libvirt and neutron agent... | 18:53 |
tbh | sripriya_, yeah probably | 18:54 |
tbh | sripriya_, sridhar_ram need a couple of reviews 1) API documentation 2) https://bugs.launchpad.net/tacker/+bug/1501079 | 18:56 |
openstack | Launchpad bug 1501079 in tacker "tacker mgmt-driver support in vnf-create flow" [Medium,In progress] - Assigned to bharaththiruveedula (bharath-ves) | 18:56 |
sripriya_ | tbh: will do by EOD | 18:57 |
tbh | sripriya_, thanks | 18:57 |
tbh | sripriya_, q-agt logs http://paste.openstack.org/show/476544/ | 19:02 |
sripriya_ | tbh: thanks looking into it | 19:02 |
*** tbh has quit IRC | 19:03 | |
*** prashantD_ has joined #tacker | 19:10 | |
*** prashantD_ has left #tacker | 19:11 | |
sridhar_ram | tbh: for API documentation bobh had a -1. Please ping him to give a thumbs up. I'll merge after that. | 19:18 |
openstackgerrit | Sripriya Seetharam proposed stackforge/tacker: Add unit tests for heat infra driver https://review.openstack.org/229987 | 19:36 |
*** trozet has quit IRC | 19:39 | |
*** trozet has joined #tacker | 19:53 | |
*** sridhar_ram1 has joined #tacker | 21:58 | |
trozet | sridhar_ram: ping? | 22:00 |
*** sridhar_ram has quit IRC | 22:00 | |
trozet | sridhar_ram1: ping? | 22:01 |
*** trozet has quit IRC | 22:12 | |
*** sridhar_ram1 has quit IRC | 23:04 | |
*** sridhar_ram has joined #tacker | 23:06 | |
*** elo has quit IRC | 23:18 | |
*** sridhar_ram1 has joined #tacker | 23:20 | |
*** sridhar_ram has quit IRC | 23:21 | |
*** lhcheng has quit IRC | 23:25 | |
*** lhcheng has joined #tacker | 23:29 | |
*** elo has joined #tacker | 23:36 | |
*** sripriya_ has quit IRC | 23:38 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!