| *** mrmartin has joined #storyboard | 06:23 | |
| alexismonville | thanks for the link Zara (with some delay ;) ) | 06:25 |
|---|---|---|
| *** jtomasek has quit IRC | 06:38 | |
| *** mrmartin has quit IRC | 07:03 | |
| *** mrmartin has joined #storyboard | 07:52 | |
| *** bethwhite has joined #storyboard | 08:18 | |
| *** jtomasek has joined #storyboard | 08:31 | |
| *** mrmartin has quit IRC | 08:48 | |
| Zara | np :) | 09:39 |
| Zara | and morning, storyboard! | 09:55 |
| Zara | I'd love to be able to edit a worklist filter | 10:01 |
| Zara | huh, automatic board worklists are the same colour as manual ones, what's going on | 10:04 |
| SotK | wat | 10:05 |
| SotK | they weren't last night | 10:05 |
| * SotK does ctrl+f5, and it is fine | 10:06 | |
| Zara | yeah, I remember they were fine last night, huh | 10:06 |
| Zara | different laptop | 10:06 |
| Zara | ah yeah, refresh fixes it, thanks | 10:07 |
| Zara | so, I was thinking last night about times that dragging a card from automatic to manual would be useful, trying to work out in general how useful it is to combine types of lists | 10:08 |
| Zara | (because it's going to be tricky if we do it and I wanna work out if it's useful first) | 10:08 |
| SotK | automatic -> manual is useful ime | 10:08 |
| Zara | the kind of workflow I imagined was this: https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/board/4 | 10:09 |
| Zara | where yeah, you could drag from left to right, from the auto to the manual worklists immediately to their right | 10:09 |
| SotK | yeah, that's similar to what I had in mind | 10:10 |
| * SotK realises he hasn't made automatic worklists omit contents that are already elsewhere in the board | 10:10 | |
| Zara | that's great | 10:10 |
| Zara | I was about to ask about that | 10:11 |
| Zara | because I think it'd be more of a 'copy' motion | 10:11 |
| Zara | otherwise how do you code for 'and hide this one' (how would it decide which to give precedence) | 10:11 |
| SotK | manual worklists would need to have precedence | 10:11 |
| Zara | (so I was worried a convention like that would result in errors...) | 10:12 |
| Zara | for that workflow I think it's okay for things to be in multiple lanes, since something could be a priority and unassigned | 10:12 |
| Zara | but ymmv | 10:12 |
| Zara | oh I thought you were listed as owner for that | 10:13 |
| * SotK agrees but likes kanbans more as a "organising my brain" tool than a "seeing the flow of work" tool | 10:13 | |
| * Zara fixes | 10:13 | |
| persia | That breaks the kanban paradigm. | 10:13 |
| Zara | I'd argue only the manual lanes form the kanban, the rest is a way of quickly seeing how to populate them. | 10:15 |
| Zara | but if having stuff in multiple lanes is confusing, then hey | 10:16 |
| persia | Hrm. Good point. Maybe "boards can be kanbans" is more correct than "boards are kanbans" | 10:20 |
| Zara | :) that's how I pictured it, but it might be one of many things I never actually wrote out anywhere or checked for consensus on. | 10:27 |
| Zara | ah, adam framed it in those terms in the spec (line 43) https://review.openstack.org/#/c/202989/7/specs/storyboard_worklists_boards.rst | 10:28 |
| Zara | so I probably went with that | 10:28 |
| persia | The spec should be considered authoritative :) | 10:36 |
| -openstackstatus- NOTICE: OVH servers are down, we are working to solve it. This will cause that jobs queue is processed slowly, please have patience. | 10:38 | |
| Zara | more boards: this is an automatic board for sb development that I made last night. https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/board/14 this is effectively two boards, but there's overlap, so I stuck them together: https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/board/15 | 10:48 |
| Zara | really it'd make sense to put 'adam review' next to 'zara todo' and vice versa | 10:49 |
| Zara | if I were using it to manage my workflow | 10:50 |
| openstackgerrit | Adam Coldrick proposed openstack-infra/storyboard-webclient: Don't try to update tasks if they don't have an ID https://review.openstack.org/308926 | 11:23 |
| Zara | jfdskdkjsf | 11:31 |
| * persia is confused: does this still allow one to set status when creating a task, but with this all happening at once, or does status setting when creating get lost? | 11:34 | |
| SotK | at the moment setting status works when creating but causes an error to pop up saying: "400: PUT /api/v1/tasks: Missing argument: "task_id"" | 11:35 |
| SotK | (it works despite the error, I should say) | 11:36 |
| SotK | anyone opposed to me merging https://review.openstack.org/#/c/292509/7 in about an hours time, please shout within the hour :) | 11:38 |
| Zara | I'm okay with it, if someone will have time to fix today or tomorrow in the event of it introducing strangeness (I can't promise that I can do it) | 11:39 |
| * SotK can do | 11:44 | |
| Zara | ohhhh you have irc on your phone? that was weird | 11:46 |
| Zara | huh... is there no way to build a schedule online this time? | 11:51 |
| Zara | ah no, the button was just tucked away | 11:51 |
| Zara | oh... it's openstackid? do I even have that? I don't think I've ever seen it before??? | 11:55 |
| Zara | well, I'm aware it's been discussed, I thought it was still under development... | 11:55 |
| Zara | actually, no, I remember people mentioning this re: summit schedule, just forgot, gah | 11:56 |
| SotK | log in with openstack id, then each thing has a little "my calendar" (or similar) button in the top right | 11:59 |
| Zara | yeah, found it now | 12:00 |
| Zara | don't think I actually had an openstack id (or at any rate, didn't have a password for it) | 12:00 |
| Zara | also, hm. browsing to the event details for every single thing to make a schedule... pen and paper time, then.. | 12:02 |
| Zara | oh no, there is another button | 12:02 |
| Zara | missed it the first time | 12:02 |
| Zara | phew | 12:02 |
| Zara | I wish it were possible to view event details in a new tab; probably too late for anyone to change it :( | 12:04 |
| *** krotscheck_dcm is now known as krotscheck | 12:15 | |
| * SotK also had to reset his password | 12:41 | |
| SotK | also yeah I have IRC on my phone | 12:41 |
| SotK | doesn't everyone?! :P | 12:41 |
| * SotK also wishes that | 12:41 | |
| SotK | its been an hour, I'm pressing the button | 12:48 |
| -openstackstatus- NOTICE: OVH provider is enabled again, please wait for the job queue to be processed | 12:49 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack-infra/storyboard-webclient: Improve 'Tasks Assigned to Me' https://review.openstack.org/292509 | 12:58 |
| *** b3rnard0_away is now known as b3rnard0 | 13:24 | |
| *** mrmartin has joined #storyboard | 14:54 | |
| Zara | aw, I thought this was an actual bbq: https://www.openstack.org/summit/austin-2016/summit-schedule/events/7797 then I saw nikitakonovalov was presenting, cool! | 15:42 |
| *** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 15:48 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has joined #storyboard | 15:48 | |
| *** mrmartin has quit IRC | 15:54 | |
| *** bethwhite has quit IRC | 16:35 | |
| *** yarkot has quit IRC | 17:02 | |
| *** yarkot has joined #storyboard | 17:06 | |
| Zara | ETOOWARM | 17:06 |
| *** pleia2_ has joined #storyboard | 17:15 | |
| *** jmccrory- has joined #storyboard | 17:18 | |
| *** jmccrory has quit IRC | 17:19 | |
| *** pleia2 has quit IRC | 17:19 | |
| *** jasondotstar has quit IRC | 17:19 | |
| *** jmccrory- is now known as jmccrory | 17:19 | |
| *** pleia2_ is now known as pleia2 | 17:20 | |
| *** jasondotstar has joined #storyboard | 17:24 | |
| * SotK paginates worklists | 17:44 | |
| SotK | maybe I'll send a patch tomorrow once I've done boards too | 17:44 |
| SotK | s/worklists/the list of worklists/ | 17:44 |
| *** mrmartin has joined #storyboard | 18:15 | |
| *** mrmartin has quit IRC | 18:19 | |
| *** mrmartin has joined #storyboard | 18:52 | |
| *** mrmartin has quit IRC | 19:09 | |
| *** mrmartin has joined #storyboard | 19:26 | |
| *** zara_the_lemur has joined #storyboard | 19:57 | |
| *** mrmartin has quit IRC | 20:15 | |
| zara_the_lemur | ahaha, I wondered what had happened with the cores party-- we're on release:independent. I'd be sad, but I'm terrified of social interaction, so it's probably a win all around. | 20:19 |
| *** mrmartin has joined #storyboard | 20:23 | |
| *** mrmartin has quit IRC | 20:23 | |
| *** zara_the_lemur has quit IRC | 20:45 | |
| *** krotscheck has quit IRC | 20:48 | |
| *** krotscheck has joined #storyboard | 20:48 | |
| * SotK wonders what release:independent is | 21:00 | |
| krotscheck | SotK: You do your own thing. As in, you're not part of the integrated-release. | 21:24 |
| *** jtomasek has quit IRC | 21:27 | |
| *** zara_the_lemur has joined #storyboard | 21:49 | |
| zara_the_lemur | stok: https://governance.openstack.org/reference/tags/release_independent.html (going by ML, only release_managed cores were invited.) | 21:50 |
| zara_the_lemur | though I'd assume in practice it was a bit broader than that.# | 21:51 |
| SotK | makes sense, thanks | 22:19 |
| *** krotscheck is now known as krotscheck_dcm | 22:32 | |
| *** zara_the_lemur has quit IRC | 22:50 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!