| *** markvoelker has quit IRC | 00:00 | |
| openstackgerrit | Paul Van Eck proposed openstack/refstack: Refactor capabilities https://review.openstack.org/292179 | 00:11 |
|---|---|---|
| *** markvoelker has joined #refstack | 01:56 | |
| *** markvoelker has quit IRC | 02:00 | |
| *** markvoelker has joined #refstack | 03:57 | |
| *** markvoelker has quit IRC | 04:01 | |
| *** markvoelker has joined #refstack | 05:58 | |
| *** markvoelker has quit IRC | 06:02 | |
| *** markvoelker has joined #refstack | 07:58 | |
| *** markvoelker has quit IRC | 08:03 | |
| *** pilgrimstack has joined #refstack | 08:43 | |
| *** pilgrimstack has quit IRC | 08:46 | |
| *** pilgrimstack has joined #refstack | 08:50 | |
| *** markvoelker has joined #refstack | 09:59 | |
| *** markvoelker has quit IRC | 10:03 | |
| *** dmellado has joined #refstack | 10:59 | |
| dmellado | Hi hogepodge, I've a question, in the lists from http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/defcore/plain/2016.01/2016.01.required.txt | 11:06 |
| dmellado | it states two tests that aren't really in that form anymore | 11:06 |
| dmellado | + tempest.api.image.v2.test_images.ListImagesTest.test_list_no_params | 11:06 |
| dmellado | and | 11:06 |
| dmellado | + empest.api.compute.servers.test_servers_negative.ServersNegativeTestJSON.test_rebuild_deleted_server | 11:06 |
| dmellado | this test doesn't exist: | 11:08 |
| dmellado | tempest.api.image.v2.test_images.ListImagesTest.test_list_no_params | 11:08 |
| dmellado | is istill 2016.1 a WIP ? | 11:08 |
| dmellado | and in this case tempest.api.compute.servers.test_servers_negative.ServersNegativeTestJSON.test_rebuild_deleted_server | 11:09 |
| dmellado | it looks like it got moved to test_rebuild_reboot_deleted_server | 11:10 |
| *** markvoelker has joined #refstack | 12:00 | |
| *** markvoelker has quit IRC | 12:04 | |
| *** edmondsw has joined #refstack | 12:31 | |
| *** markvoelker has joined #refstack | 12:51 | |
| *** cjvolzka has joined #refstack | 13:07 | |
| *** esker has quit IRC | 13:13 | |
| *** esker has joined #refstack | 13:14 | |
| *** krotscheck has joined #refstack | 13:32 | |
| *** pilgrimstack1 has joined #refstack | 14:54 | |
| *** pilgrimstack has quit IRC | 14:54 | |
| *** esker has quit IRC | 15:15 | |
| hogepodge | dmellado: sometimes tests get moved, you should search against the idempotent ID in Tempest to find the new name if they have. | 16:15 |
| dmellado | hogepodge: but shouldn't the list be changed too then? | 16:16 |
| dmellado | i.e. https://refstack.openstack.org/#/results/93b8abbf-6563-43ff-8ec9-fd8ca061d3cf | 16:16 |
| openstackgerrit | Paul Van Eck proposed openstack/refstack: Refactor capabilities https://review.openstack.org/292179 | 16:16 |
| hogepodge | dmellado: we rely upon updates to the standard that include aliases to account for moved tests. I can take a look later today and submit the review to gerrit | 16:18 |
| dmellado | hogepodge: that'd be great, if you tell me when do you keep the gerrit for the test list maybe I could even send the patch myself | 16:19 |
| dmellado | hogepodge: yep, different name but same id | 16:25 |
| dmellado | 169 @test.idempotent_id('98fa0458-1485-440f-873b-fe7f0d714930') | 16:25 |
| dmellado | 170 def test_rebuild_reboot_deleted_server(self): | 16:25 |
| dmellado | would you need to change the test list then? | 16:25 |
| dmellado | this is all on the commit 551e1a9701e7e2b3edf6d49a2eaa62b7ab2435ad from tempest that refstack-client uses | 16:27 |
| hogepodge | dmellado: we add an alias field to the test entry for the active guidelines that has the new name of the test | 16:51 |
| openstackgerrit | Catherine Diep proposed openstack/refstack: REST API specification for product management. https://review.openstack.org/292526 | 17:35 |
| *** pvaneck has joined #refstack | 17:57 | |
| catherineD | dmellado: RefStack is working on providing an API for listing of the required test list per specific Guideline file including alias ... | 18:00 |
| *** pilgrimstack1 has quit IRC | 18:11 | |
| *** pilgrimstack has joined #refstack | 18:12 | |
| catherineD | hogepodge: dmellado: I submitted this bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/refstack/+bug/1557109 | 18:38 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1557109 in refstack "RefStack UI should display test alias names" [Undecided,Confirmed] | 18:38 |
| *** eglute_s is now known as eglute | 18:39 | |
| *** esker has joined #refstack | 19:20 | |
| openstackgerrit | Paul Van Eck proposed openstack/refstack: Add link to pubkey/signature instructions https://review.openstack.org/292560 | 19:26 |
| openstackgerrit | Paul Van Eck proposed openstack/refstack: Add link to pubkey/signature instructions https://review.openstack.org/292560 | 19:30 |
| catherineD | hi | 20:02 |
| *** alexandrelevine has joined #refstack | 20:02 | |
| *** elmiko has joined #refstack | 20:02 | |
| sslypushenko | hi | 20:03 |
| elmiko | hi, i just happened to catch the end of your meeting, but i also participate with the security project. was there a question about how we can help? | 20:03 |
| catherineD | elmiko: we have an email that discuss about the subject ... I guess I will need to send it to the distribution list | 20:04 |
| catherineD | but we can discuss here | 20:04 |
| catherineD | background info: | 20:04 |
| catherineD | 1) When a user registers at RefStack, RefStack does not request any user information input from the user, Instead, RefStack redirects the registration process to OpenstackId Identity Provider ( https://openstackid.org/ ) and acquires three pieces of user information ( Full Name, email, OpenID ) from the OpenstackId Identity Provider. | 20:05 |
| catherineD | 2) OpenstackId Identity Provider ( https://openstackid.org/ ) treats email as private information. You will not find email or OpenID information on any member's public profile on https://www.openstack.org/community/members/ . Furthermore, if you look at your own profile on https://www.openstack.org/profile/ , you will find that email information is listed under the "private information" sectio | 20:05 |
| catherineD | 3) Since OpenstackId Identity Provider is the source of the user information of RefStack, RefStack should respect and not relax the privacy policy set by its source . | 20:05 |
| catherineD | We would like to get answer for the following: | 20:06 |
| *** rockyg has joined #refstack | 20:06 | |
| catherineD | 1) Should a regular user ( authenticated or anonymous) be able to list all users in RefStack? | 20:06 |
| catherineD | If the answer is yes, then which user information should be returned (Full name, email, OpenID)? | 20:06 |
| alexandrelevine | 1) Not anonymous, though | 20:06 |
| catherineD | 2) Or ONLY foundation members can list all users in RefStack? | 20:07 |
| elmiko | good questions | 20:07 |
| catherineD | Note: the user information for review.openstack.org is set in https://review.openstack.org/#/settings/web-identities and not from OpenstackId Identity Provider. | 20:07 |
| elmiko | i'd need to read up on refstack a little more, but i think this is something that would be worth bringing up on the dev list with the [security] tag in the subject, i can also bring some attention to it at our meeting this week | 20:07 |
| catherineD | on review.openstack.org email seems to be public data | 20:08 |
| catherineD | elmiko: good suggestion | 20:08 |
| elmiko | seems like just listing the users isn't so bad, emails might be another issue | 20:08 |
| alexandrelevine | elmiko: A little more on background. We need to have Vendor to add co-admins by choosing them somehow. | 20:08 |
| elmiko | hmm, interesting | 20:08 |
| catherineD | elmiko: we just want to be careful with the data that we fetch from some where | 20:08 |
| elmiko | catherineD: +1 | 20:09 |
| elmiko | do you have a link to the email? | 20:09 |
| alexandrelevine | elmiko: What do you mean "have a link"? | 20:09 |
| catherineD | so far it is a private email among us ... I can send it out to the distribution list | 20:09 |
| elmiko | to the archived email message that catherineD references earlier. (or is that not written yet) | 20:09 |
| elmiko | ah, cool | 20:09 |
| elmiko | catherineD: definitely send it to the list, and if nothing comes up i will make sure to bring it up at our meeting on thursday | 20:10 |
| catherineD | I just want to be careful and responsible with data | 20:10 |
| elmiko | catherineD: +1 | 20:10 |
| catherineD | elmiko: will do thank you | 20:10 |
| elmiko | catherineD: np, thanks for bringing it up =) | 20:10 |
| alexandrelevine | thanks, bye. | 20:11 |
| catherineD | thank you everyone ... does not matter what the outcome is .... we show that we care about what we do ... :-) | 20:11 |
| *** alexandrelevine has quit IRC | 20:11 | |
| sslypushenko | catherineD: also we can do lookup only by user name, but it is less handy | 20:11 |
| catherineD | sslypushenko: I think so | 20:12 |
| sslypushenko | alexandrelevine We can right now implement openid lookup by names right now and add email later we get an agreement here | 20:14 |
| sslypushenko | catherineD: I see that user can control a visibility of email on openstackid.org | 20:16 |
| sslypushenko | so, it looks like we should stick to idea that only user names and openids can be shared without any security impact | 20:18 |
| catherineD | yea I think so | 20:19 |
| catherineD | I have an other idea | 20:19 |
| catherineD | maybe the user can request for adding user to vendor .. instead of vendor admin to add user to vendor | 20:20 |
| *** edmondsw has quit IRC | 20:35 | |
| *** cjvolzka has left #refstack | 21:24 | |
| *** markvoelker has quit IRC | 22:39 | |
| *** rockyg has quit IRC | 23:07 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!