Tuesday, 2024-02-13

rdogerritrdo-trunk rdo-trunk proposed rdoinfo master: Bump rdoinfo zed tags to latest upper-constraints or latest Puppetfile  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdoinfo/+/5165700:51
rdogerritrdo-trunk rdo-trunk proposed rdoinfo master: Promote CBS tags update for antelope-9s-testing  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdoinfo/+/5142701:02
rdogerritrdo-trunk rdo-trunk proposed rdoinfo master: Promote CBS tags update for zed-9s-testing  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdoinfo/+/5165801:03
rdogerritrdo-trunk rdo-trunk proposed rdoinfo master: Promote CBS tags update for wallaby-8s-testing  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdoinfo/+/5128201:04
rdogerritMerged rdoinfo master: Promote CBS tags update for zed-9s-testing  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdoinfo/+/5165806:29
rdogerritMerged rdoinfo master: Bump rdoinfo zed tags to latest upper-constraints or latest Puppetfile  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdoinfo/+/5165706:35
rdogerritrdo-trunk rdo-trunk proposed openstack/openstackclient-distgit zed-rdo: python-openstackclient-6.0.1-1  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/openstack/openstackclient-distgit/+/5165906:38
rdogerritrdo-trunk rdo-trunk proposed openstack/oslo-messaging-distgit zed-rdo: python-oslo-messaging-14.0.3-1  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/openstack/oslo-messaging-distgit/+/5166006:38
rdogerritrdo-trunk rdo-trunk proposed openstack/sushy-distgit zed-rdo: python-sushy-4.3.4-1  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/openstack/sushy-distgit/+/5166106:38
rdogerritMerged openstack/oslo-messaging-distgit zed-rdo: python-oslo-messaging-14.0.3-1  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/openstack/oslo-messaging-distgit/+/5166007:22
rdogerritMerged openstack/sushy-distgit zed-rdo: python-sushy-4.3.4-1  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/openstack/sushy-distgit/+/5166107:22
rdogerritMerged openstack/openstackclient-distgit zed-rdo: python-openstackclient-6.0.1-1  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/openstack/openstackclient-distgit/+/5165907:23
rdogerritChandan Kumar proposed rdo-jobs master: Drop centos-9-crc-single-node-centos-9-standalone nodeset  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-jobs/+/5166207:53
amoralejjcapitao[m], wrt the issue with manila tempest in antelope, maybe we could start by reverting the manila plugin update we did in https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdoinfo/+/5142208:08
jcapitao[m]I found the root cause08:08
amoralejwhat's it?08:08
jcapitao[m]https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila-tempest-plugin/+/88861808:08
jcapitao[m]since this commit it's failing08:08
jcapitao[m]https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22bp/allow-locking-shares-against-deletion%22+project:openstack/manila need to be backported in stable/antelope08:09
jcapitao[m]but there is too much conflicts ..08:09
jcapitao[m]IMHO the change is too big to be backported08:09
amoralejand actually, that may go agains stable policy rules08:10
amoralejdunno08:10
jcapitao[m]so I think we need to pin manila plugin to 8d4a2de08:10
amoralejyou found any way to test it?08:10
amoralejwith DNM i mean08:10
jcapitao[m]the commit before the failing one08:10
jcapitao[m]yeah with my DNM patches from yesterday08:10
amoralejpropose it and we will ask someone for reviews08:11
jcapitao[m]the pinning ?08:11
amoralejexplain it in the commit message08:11
amoralejyes08:11
amoralejbtw, i think we discussed about running p-o-i in u-c updates08:11
jcapitao[m]I was writing my investigation result in https://issues.redhat.com/projects/RDO/issues/RDO-20608:11
amoraleju-c bumps, i mean08:11
jcapitao[m]yeah08:11
jcapitao[m]at least for antelope...08:12
amoralejok, but please add some explanation in the commit message too :)08:12
jcapitao[m]we would have caught it08:12
amoralejyep08:12
jcapitao[m]yeah sure, no worries for the commit message ;)08:12
amoralejbtw, is there any "official" way to reference jira tickets in commit messages?08:13
amoralejwe may keep using the usual "Resolves:" etc ...08:13
jcapitao[m]don't think so08:13
amoralejalthough there is no automation08:13
jcapitao[m]yeah..08:13
jcapitao[m]there is for LP because there is automation08:13
amoralejyes, but i think it'd be good to agree in some common way08:14
amoralejkarolinku[m] wrt link jira tickets in commit messages08:15
amoralej^08:15
karolinku[m]why Resolves: is bad idea?08:23
karolinku[m]long time ago I was using quite nice integratorin for Jira and bitbucket08:26
karolinku[m]maybe there is some plugins to integrate with gerrit08:27
amoralejhow worked it?08:27
amoralejusing ticket name in commit subject or something like that?08:27
amoralejhttps://support.atlassian.com/jira-software-cloud/docs/reference-issues-in-your-development-work/08:27
amoralejthat's what i've found08:27
karolinku[m]for gerrit rewiew you had to added some hook name, sth like "Resolves" and it automatically pin it to jira ticket08:27
rdogerritJoel Capitao proposed rdoinfo master: Pin manila tempest plugin in Antelope  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdoinfo/+/5166308:28
amoralejhttps://marketplace.atlassian.com/apps/1210874/gerrit-code-review-for-jira?tab=overview&hosting=server08:30
amoralejthat's one08:30
amoralejbut dunno if that's available08:30
jcapitao[m]karolinku: you mean it adds the link in the review ? or it update the JIRA ticket with the review URL ?08:30
karolinku[m]second option08:30
amoralejthat'd be cool, actually, that's other question i had :)08:31
amoralejwe can link manually08:31
amoralejfor that plugin, i.e. https://github.com/MeetMe/jira-gerrit-plugin/blob/master/README.md08:31
amoralejthey use "Bug:" or "Issue:" footer08:31
amoralejor symply  Look for the issue key in the commit message08:32
jcapitao[m]I think infra is using "Issue"08:32
amoralejIssue wfm08:35
amoraleji think, as soon as we agree on something, is good08:35
karolinku[m]are we able to install plugins?08:36
jcapitao[m]I hope so08:37
amoraleji guess nop08:37
jcapitao[m]https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdoinfo/+/5166308:37
jcapitao[m]if you can review ^08:37
jcapitao[m]to unblock antelope promotion08:38
amoralejlet's wait for tosky review08:38
jcapitao[m]d/s are waiting some changes08:38
amoralejjcapitao[m], https://bugs.launchpad.net/manila/+bug/2051926 is related?08:44
amoralejapparently it comes from discussion08:44
amoralejhttps://meetings.opendev.org/irclogs/%23rdo/%23rdo.2024-02-01.log.html#t2024-02-01T08:40:4508:45
jcapitao[m]looks like another issue08:47
amoralejno, i think it's related08:47
amoralejthey are proposing to skip tests if the manila server do not provide a certain microviersion08:48
amoralejwhich is the issue with those tests for manila08:48
rdogerritmathieu bultel proposed openstack/os-diff-distgit rpm-master: Add os-diff specfile for rdo-package  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/openstack/os-diff-distgit/+/5156008:51
jcapitao[m]amoralej: ok it's related https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/887115/13/manila/api/openstack/api_version_request.py#20808:54
amoralejyep08:55
jcapitao[m]from the failing patch I found https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/88711508:55
rdogerritmathieu bultel proposed openstack/os-diff-distgit rpm-master: Add os-diff specfile for rdo-package  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/openstack/os-diff-distgit/+/5156008:55
amoralejso, i guess, until they include by-microversion skipping in the tempest plugin, the best option is to revert, let's see what manila or tempest guys say08:56
jcapitao[m]agree08:56
jcapitao[m]I checked the manila LP yesterday and didn't find out the bug reported by Takashi .. 08:57
jcapitao[m]nvm, good to practise troubleshooting skills08:59
amoralejyes, this wasn't an easy one :)09:00
amoralejmatbu, ^ i left some comments in the review09:06
rdogerritAlfredo Moralejo proposed config master: Add Zuul definitions for os-diff  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/config/+/5166409:23
rdogerritMerged config master: Add Zuul definitions for os-diff  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/config/+/5166409:29
tosky_so, about that manila promotion issue09:32
tosky_didn't we say it's a problem with the promotion jobs? I propose to disable the job which fails09:32
amoralejthe job or the test ?09:32
tosky_amoralej, jcapitao[m] , tkajinam ^^09:32
amoralejwell, imo it's not job issue, it's plugin compatibility issue, tbh, but if we want to add some skip rule, i'm good with it09:33
tosky_it's the fact that the plugin is default to max microversion and expecting users to set it09:33
amoralejso, it can be configured? sorry, i missed that part09:34
tosky_which may be wrong, yes, but that means that the job should be adapted as it is asking manila for something which is not supported09:34
tkajinamI've prepared the required changes to puppet-tempest to set min/max micro version and ideally we can merge it and backport it to stable branches to set the appropriate versions to workaround the current problem with the plugin09:34
tkajinamhttps://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/puppet-tempest/+/90739909:34
tosky_https://meetings.opendev.org/irclogs/%23openstack-manila/%23openstack-manila.2024-02-01.log.html#t2024-02-01T15:10:2409:35
tkajinamhowever especially the backport part is broken because of the nasty libvirt bug which is not yet fixed after a week. I really don't want to update every stable branch and then revert the change so am waiting until the fix is released09:35
tosky_ok, so maybe we can just forcibly skip that test?09:35
tosky_but I'm against reverting an otherwise working plugin to an previous commit just for a configuration issue 09:36
amoralejok, please comment in the review09:36
amoralejapparently it's failing in setup so all jobs are failing, i'd say09:37
amoralejiiuc https://logserver.rdoproject.org/openstack-periodic-daily2/review.rdoproject.org/rdoinfo/master/weirdo-antelope-promote-puppet-scenario005-centos-stream-9/5f46097/logs/weirdo-project/logs/testr_results.html09:38
amoralejtkajinam, wrt the libvirt issue, your workaround in p-o-i is not fixing all the puppet jobs ?09:38
jcapitao[m]I'm ok with skipping the jobs as workaround as well09:39
tkajinamI've merged the change to exclude the bad libvirt in master but haven't yet backported it to stable branches09:39
tkajinamam hoping to get a fix instead of patching 4 stable branches and then revert these all09:39
amoralejah, ok, that's the issue09:39
jcapitao[m]makes sense09:40
amoraleji read somewhere that the fix will be in the next compose09:40
amoralejlemme check09:40
jcapitao[m]new libvirt should land in mirror this week09:40
jcapitao[m]hopefully09:40
tkajinamyea that's why I understood from the update in jira09:40
tkajinamso I'd leave it now  unless you need urgent requirement to avoid forcing promotion09:41
tkajinamyou *have*09:41
jcapitao[m]I think we can wait09:41
amoralejantelope promotion is 14 days old, but if there is path to get the proper fix, i'm fine09:42
amoralej10.0.0-2 is in now https://composes.stream.centos.org/production/latest-CentOS-Stream/compose/AppStream/x86_64/os/ we will see09:43
rdogerritMarios Andreou proposed rdo-jobs master: Adding new data-plane-adoption-osp17-multinode-to-extracted-crc  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-jobs/+/5122709:47
*** tosky_ is now known as tosky09:48
rdogerritMarihan Girgis proposed config master: Add infrawatch/functional-test to zuul  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/config/+/5166509:53
rdogerritMarihan Girgis proposed config master: Add infrawatch/functional-test to zuul  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/config/+/5166610:04
rdogerritJoel Capitao proposed puppet/puppet-concat-distgit antelope-rdo: puppet-concat-7.3.3-1  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/puppet/puppet-concat-distgit/+/5076911:31
rdogerritJoel Capitao proposed puppet/puppet-concat-distgit antelope-rdo: puppet-concat-7.3.3-1  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/puppet/puppet-concat-distgit/+/5076911:31
rdogerritMerged puppet/puppet-concat-distgit antelope-rdo: puppet-concat-7.3.3-1  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/puppet/puppet-concat-distgit/+/5076911:45
rdogerritMerged rdo-infra/ansible-role-dlrn master: Switch from RSA review.r.o key fingerprint to ECDSA  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ansible-role-dlrn/+/4807612:57
rdogerritMerged openstack/manila-distgit yoga-rdo: openstack-manila-14.2.0-1  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/openstack/manila-distgit/+/5164313:13
rdogerritAlfredo Moralejo proposed rdoinfo master: Pin the packages falling back to master in Bobcat  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdoinfo/+/5166714:21
amoralejjcapitao[m], ^ wrt pinning branchless packages in bobcat14:34
jcapitao[m]amoralej: ack, I'm reviewing with my script14:43
amoralejack14:43
jcapitao[m]also, could you review https://softwarefactory-project.io/r/c/DLRN/+/30442 when you have a chance please14:44
jcapitao[m]I had to fix a dep issue as well https://softwarefactory-project.io/r/c/DLRN/+/3082514:45
rdogerritMarios Andreou proposed rdo-jobs master: Adding new data-plane-adoption-osp17-multinode-to-extracted-crc  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-jobs/+/5122714:58
rdogerritJoel Capitao proposed rdo-jobs master: Use opendev git forge instead of GH  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-jobs/+/5166814:58
jcapitao[m]amoralej: ^ to be added as depends-on in your patch14:59
rdogerritJoel Capitao proposed rdoinfo master: Pin the packages falling back to master in Bobcat  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdoinfo/+/5166715:01
jcapitao[m]I added it15:01
spotz[m]How'd the clean up go this morning/afternoon?15:05
amoralejspotz[m], we rescheduled for tomorrow beacuse of availability issues15:08
spotz[m]amoralej: same time?15:09
amoraleji'll add you to the invite15:09
amoralejalthough it will be in the middle of the night for you :)15:09
spotz[m]Yeah I'll be asleep:)15:10
spotz[m]I maybed in case a dog wakes me up but don't count on it15:12
amoralejjcapitao[m], i will remove openstack-macros15:17
jcapitao[m]okk15:17
jcapitao[m]looks like we don't have distgit15:17
amoralejyes15:17
jcapitao[m]wondering how we manage when bootstrapping15:18
amoralejit's special case15:18
rdogerritAlfredo Moralejo proposed rdoinfo master: Pin the packages falling back to master in Bobcat  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdoinfo/+/5166715:18
rdogerritJoel Capitao proposed rdo-infra/releng master: DNM Script to list projects commit built not in release branch  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/releng/+/5163215:50
jcapitao[m]amoralej: I left a comment in https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RDO-16015:55
amoralejso, what are the ones you miss?16:00
amoralejah, i see why i missed some16:01
jcapitao[m]the ones missing are tcib16:02
jcapitao[m]edpm-image-builder 16:02
amoralejyes, those two16:02
amoralejwe need to specify main16:02
amoralejwe define source-branch at root level16:02
jcapitao[m]ah you grep on master ?16:02
amoralejno, i grep on "Falling back"16:03
amoralejthose two have source-branch: main defined in base, so they directly try that repo and do not fallback16:03
jcapitao[m]okk16:03
amoralejfor puppet-archive, i see it's pinned 16:03
jcapitao[m]yeah my script should not show it16:04
jcapitao[m]it's a false positive16:04
jcapitao[m]and python-os-client-config as well16:04
rdogerritAlfredo Moralejo proposed rdoinfo master: Pin the packages falling back to master in Bobcat  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdoinfo/+/5166716:07
amoralejjcapitao[m], ^ updated tcib and edpm-image-builder16:08

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!