| *** dviroel|out is now known as dviroel | 00:33 | |
| rdogerrit | rdo-trunk proposed rdoinfo master: Bump rdoinfo wallaby tags to latest upper-constraints https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdoinfo/+/43781 | 00:35 |
|---|---|---|
| rdogerrit | rdo-trunk proposed rdoinfo master: Bump rdoinfo xena tags to latest upper-constraints https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdoinfo/+/44007 | 00:35 |
| rdogerrit | rdo-trunk proposed nfvinfo master: Promote CBS tags update for nfvsig-2.15-release https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/nfvinfo/+/44034 | 00:38 |
| rdogerrit | rdo-trunk proposed nfvinfo master: Promote CBS tags update for nfvsig-2.16-release https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/nfvinfo/+/44035 | 00:38 |
| rdogerrit | rdo-trunk proposed nfvinfo master: Promote CBS tags update for nfvsig-2021-release https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/nfvinfo/+/43667 | 00:38 |
| rdogerrit | rdo-trunk created rdoinfo master: Promote CBS tags update for xena-8s-release https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdoinfo/+/44073 | 00:38 |
| rdogerrit | rdo-trunk created rdoinfo master: Promote CBS tags update for wallaby-8s-release https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdoinfo/+/44074 | 00:41 |
| rdogerrit | rdo-trunk created openstack/tripleoclient-distgit victoria-rdo: python-tripleoclient: failed to build fda32334 https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/openstack/tripleoclient-distgit/+/44075 | 00:59 |
| *** dviroel is now known as dviroel|out | 01:00 | |
| *** rlandy|ruck is now known as rlandy|out | 01:00 | |
| *** ysandeep|out is now known as ysandeep | 01:52 | |
| rdogerrit | Chandan Kumar created rdoinfo master: [DNM] Generate standalone tripleo-ansible rpm https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdoinfo/+/44076 | 02:20 |
| rdogerrit | Chandan Kumar proposed rdoinfo master: [DNM] Generate standalone tripleo-ansible rpm https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdoinfo/+/44076 | 02:29 |
| *** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|afk | 03:23 | |
| rdogerrit | Gregory Thiemonge created openstack/octavia-distgit rpm-master: Revert "Update Octavia spec for secure-RBAC" https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/openstack/octavia-distgit/+/44093 | 05:51 |
| rdogerrit | Gregory Thiemonge created openstack/octavia-distgit yoga-rdo: Revert "Update Octavia spec for secure-RBAC" https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/openstack/octavia-distgit/+/44094 | 05:51 |
| rdogerrit | Gregory Thiemonge created openstack/octavia-distgit xena-rdo: Revert "Update Octavia spec for secure-RBAC" https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/openstack/octavia-distgit/+/44095 | 05:51 |
| rdogerrit | Gregory Thiemonge created openstack/octavia-distgit wallaby-rdo: Revert "Update Octavia spec for secure-RBAC" https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/openstack/octavia-distgit/+/44096 | 05:51 |
| *** amoralej|off is now known as amoralej | 06:09 | |
| rdogerrit | Merged openstack/octavia-distgit rpm-master: Revert "Update Octavia spec for secure-RBAC" https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/openstack/octavia-distgit/+/44093 | 06:20 |
| rdogerrit | Merged openstack/octavia-distgit yoga-rdo: Revert "Update Octavia spec for secure-RBAC" https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/openstack/octavia-distgit/+/44094 | 06:25 |
| rdogerrit | Merged openstack/octavia-distgit xena-rdo: Revert "Update Octavia spec for secure-RBAC" https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/openstack/octavia-distgit/+/44095 | 06:25 |
| rdogerrit | Joel Capitao created rdo-website master: Remove Fedora references https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-website/+/44077 | 06:25 |
| rdogerrit | Merged openstack/octavia-distgit wallaby-rdo: Revert "Update Octavia spec for secure-RBAC" https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/openstack/octavia-distgit/+/44096 | 06:26 |
| chkumar|rover | amoralej: hello | 06:43 |
| amoralej | hi chkumar|rover | 06:44 |
| chkumar|rover | amoralej: I am trying to build tripleo-ansible rpm here https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdoinfo/+/44076 from a particular commit | 06:44 |
| chkumar|rover | but dlrn build is failing | 06:44 |
| chkumar|rover | :No commits to build. If this is not expected, please make sure the package name(s) are correct, and that any failed commit you want to rebuild has been removed from the database. | 06:45 |
| chkumar|rover | in rdoinfo, I have used the commit of the patch having upstream-id pointed in the commit msg | 06:45 |
| amoralej | lemme check, i'm not sure | 06:45 |
| chkumar|rover | Do I need to use something else there? | 06:45 |
| amoralej | chkumar|rover, i think we use that in distgit repos, not in rdoinfo | 06:46 |
| amoralej | so you could send a dummy patch to tripleo-ansible distgit with upstream-id | 06:46 |
| chkumar|rover | ok let me do that | 06:47 |
| amoralej | let me check anyway | 06:47 |
| amoralej | chkumar|rover, you simply want to get the package built? | 06:49 |
| chkumar|rover | amoralej: yes, I just want the package built | 06:50 |
| amoralej | then, send the patch to the distgit | 06:50 |
| rdogerrit | Chandan Kumar created openstack/tripleo-ansible-distgit rpm-master: [DNM] dummy commit to build tripleo-ansible rpm https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/openstack/tripleo-ansible-distgit/+/44078 | 06:51 |
| chkumar|rover | amoralej: done ^^ thanks :-) | 06:51 |
| *** ysandeep|afk is now known as ysandeep | 10:14 | |
| rdogerrit | Amol Kahat proposed rdo-infra/ci-config master: Added instructions to use infra-setup roles. https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/42788 | 10:16 |
| *** rlandy|out is now known as rlandy | 10:33 | |
| rdogerrit | Alfredo Moralejo created nfvinfo master: Update ovn-2021 to ovn-2021-21.12.0-82 https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/nfvinfo/+/44081 | 11:25 |
| amoralej | ykarel, ^ with fixes for ovn issue | 11:25 |
| ykarel | amoralej, okk Thanks | 11:25 |
| amoralej | you also want to test those? | 11:25 |
| ykarel | amoralej, i think the CI jobs there should be enough | 11:26 |
| amoralej | btw, some jobs failed in https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/+/850398 | 11:26 |
| amoralej | ykarel, i mean, to test with the cpu types in upstream infra | 11:26 |
| ykarel | amoralej, yes i checked failures, but those are unrelated and known issues | 11:26 |
| ykarel | i am testing more jobs now | 11:26 |
| amoralej | ack, good | 11:27 |
| ykarel | https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:ovs2.17 | 11:27 |
| ykarel | if ^ goes well we can consider merging | 11:27 |
| ykarel | amoralej, cpu thing is good with the fixes | 11:27 |
| amoralej | ack | 11:27 |
| ykarel | i had tested earlier | 11:27 |
| amoralej | good | 11:28 |
| *** anbanerj is now known as frenzy_friday | 11:33 | |
| rdogerrit | Merged nfvinfo master: Promote CBS tags update for nfvsig-2.16-release https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/nfvinfo/+/44035 | 11:33 |
| *** dviroel|out is now known as dviroel | 11:34 | |
| *** anbanerj is now known as frenzy_friday | 11:58 | |
| apevec | anyone knows more about sqlalchemy in CS9? Looks like it was recently introduced https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/rpms/python-sqlalchemy/-/merge_requests/1 and higher NVR than compatible with openstack? | 12:05 |
| apevec | what version we have in deps? | 12:05 |
| rdogerrit | Alfredo Moralejo created openstack/barbican-distgit wallaby-rdo: Set max version of sqlalchemy in wallaby https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/openstack/barbican-distgit/+/44082 | 12:06 |
| amoralej | apevec, see discusion in #oooq | 12:06 |
| amoralej | apevec, and see ^ | 12:06 |
| rdogerrit | Alfredo Moralejo proposed openstack/barbican-distgit wallaby-rdo: Set max version of sqlalchemy in wallaby https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/openstack/barbican-distgit/+/44082 | 12:07 |
| rdogerrit | Chandan Kumar created rdo-infra/ci-config master: Remove sc10 ovn job from criteria https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/44083 | 12:07 |
| apevec | yeah I'm looking now at https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/+/850442 | 12:07 |
| amoralej | chkumar|rover, ^ it may be easier that way | 12:09 |
| amoralej | mmm although it will need promotion | 12:10 |
| *** amoralej is now known as amoralej|lunch | 12:10 | |
| chkumar|rover | amoralej|lunch: thanks! | 12:30 |
| rdogerrit | User karolinku proposed rdo-infra/releng master: WIP: FTBFS dashboard - new script and CLI https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/releng/+/43723 | 12:55 |
| rdogerrit | Merged rdo-infra/ci-config master: Remove sc10 ovn job from criteria https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/44083 | 13:13 |
| *** amoralej|lunch is now known as amoralej | 13:20 | |
| spotz | Just a reminder meeting in about 30 minutes. If you have an items please add them to https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/RDO-Meeting | 13:28 |
| rdogerrit | Merged openstack/barbican-distgit wallaby-rdo: Set max version of sqlalchemy in wallaby https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/openstack/barbican-distgit/+/44082 | 13:33 |
| *** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|afk | 13:37 | |
| *** dasm|off is now known as dasm|ruck | 13:48 | |
| *** geguileor is now known as geguileo | 14:00 | |
| spotz | amoralej: You wanted to talk about your stuff today yes? | 14:01 |
| spotz | #startmeeting RDO meeting - 2022-07-20 | 14:01 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting started Wed Jul 20 14:01:50 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is spotz. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 14:01 |
| opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 14:01 |
| opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'rdo_meeting___2022_07_20' | 14:01 |
| spotz | #topic ROll Call | 14:02 |
| amoralej | o/ | 14:02 |
| amoralej | i have a couple of topics | 14:02 |
| kkula | o/ | 14:04 |
| spotz | #chair amoralej kkula | 14:05 |
| opendevmeet | Current chairs: amoralej kkula spotz | 14:05 |
| spotz | I moved them down from next week's area just wanted to be sure:) | 14:05 |
| spotz | #topic Should we create centos9-master-head RDO Trunk repo ? | 14:05 |
| amoralej | ah, ok | 14:06 |
| amoralej | #info RDO Trunk builders centos8-master and centos8-master-head are stopped now | 14:07 |
| spotz | Have we had any issues or are we good? | 14:07 |
| amoralej | #info for CS9 we onle created centos9-master, which follows versions in upper-constraints.txt but we didn't create centos9-master-head followint master peaks | 14:08 |
| amoralej | spotz, we are good, no news so far | 14:08 |
| amoralej | no news == good news | 14:08 |
| amoralej | so, my doubt is if we should create centos9-master-head chasing master | 14:08 |
| amoralej | my feeling is that it wasn't providing much value | 14:09 |
| amoralej | as we use centos9-master for ci and everything | 14:09 |
| amoralej | the goal of centos9-master-head is to find issues before they reach upper-constraints | 14:09 |
| amoralej | but i have doubts it's useful tbh | 14:09 |
| amoralej | so i was thinking if we should create it or forget it | 14:10 |
| amoralej | apevec ykarel ^ you have any opinion? | 14:10 |
| amoralej | kkula spotz wdyt? | 14:11 |
| spotz | Ok, in the meeting the TC had with folks from CentOS 2 weeks ago a theme sems to be to have a set timestamp so to speak of Stream to test again. Do you think that would be helpful? | 14:11 |
| amoralej | you mean versioned centos repos? | 14:11 |
| ykarel | amoralej, atleast it was useful when spec changes were needed for pinned libraries/clients | 14:11 |
| amoralej | well, it's useful if we monitor it :) | 14:12 |
| spotz | Sort of just so as ykarel just typed you have an idea of versions in it | 14:12 |
| amoralej | and it also brings some false negatives | 14:12 |
| ykarel | to know the upcoming changes earlier then at the time of -uc update | 14:12 |
| ykarel | but yes i don't think it was used other than it | 14:12 |
| spotz | I was thinking more froma known point of time what's in it if we then update and things start breaking | 14:13 |
| *** ysandeep|afk is now known as ysandeep | 14:13 | |
| amoralej | maybe it will be easier to monitor with our incoming great ftbfs dashboard :) | 14:13 |
| amoralej | spotz, so, for RDO repos itself we have it, so i understand the problem is with centos repos | 14:14 |
| spotz | correct | 14:14 |
| amoralej | that's not something that centos provide, the provide some timestamped repos, but they don't have any commitment | 14:15 |
| amoralej | on how much they will be stay around | 14:15 |
| ykarel | yes and agree about false positives, so if it's takes much resources and maintenance can avoid it, it's already not running so good time to decide over it | 14:15 |
| ykarel | as packaging issues can always be fixed at time of uc updates | 14:15 |
| spotz | Right but if we could pul a set of repos and keep using that set on our side is my thought if we can, we may not be able to | 14:15 |
| amoralej | ykarel, yep, we decided not to create it until we remove the centos8 one, so it's time to consider it | 14:16 |
| amoralej | spotz, we may create a version + mirror mechanism | 14:16 |
| spotz | +1 | 14:16 |
| amoralej | we tried not to do it in the past, actually :) | 14:16 |
| amoralej | it can be problematic, as it's kind of "forking centos" | 14:16 |
| amoralej | so, i.e. I'd be against recomending it for users or operators, for sure | 14:17 |
| amoralej | i mean recommending to use some frozen repos that we take responsibility on | 14:17 |
| spotz | Aleksandra has some ideas and we wouldn't patch it or anything just keep it for a few days after starting on the next 'fork' and if it goes well delete and if not compare and reprot what's broken to CentOS and get help | 14:18 |
| amoralej | i.e. what if there is some issue which blocks promotion of new content and we con't push CVEs... | 14:18 |
| spotz | We learned in Berlin at least one company is doing it actually not sue what they're doing for CVEs though | 14:19 |
| ykarel | amoralej, ack | 14:19 |
| amoralej | spotz, the best option for that would be that centos allows us to run CI jobs on their composes | 14:19 |
| amoralej | before they push | 14:19 |
| amoralej | so that we can provide feedback on content pending to be pushed | 14:19 |
| amoralej | did that option appeared in the conversation? | 14:20 |
| ykarel | iirc tripleo ci did some work in past to test composes? | 14:20 |
| amoralej | yes | 14:20 |
| spotz | Can always ask from the CLoud SIg:) | 14:20 |
| ykarel | and those tests didn't catched the issues ? | 14:21 |
| amoralej | but, if it's not providing feedback to centos team, it's not very useful, in some cases we can save some time | 14:21 |
| amoralej | ykarel, i think we catched some, but it also has its own issues | 14:21 |
| amoralej | actually, i think there is still the idea to create that | 14:21 |
| ykarel | amoralej, ohkk | 14:21 |
| amoralej | i mean, running regular ci jobs using official mirrors | 14:21 |
| amoralej | but have a separated pipeline testing unpublished compose | 14:22 |
| amoralej | chkumar|rover, ^ is that idea still around? | 14:22 |
| amoralej | the problem with that is, we should also mirror sig content, etc... | 14:23 |
| amoralej | or we may hit other issues | 14:23 |
| amoralej | spotz, who participated in that meeting? | 14:23 |
| spotz | apevac, bstinson, and Aleksandra. In hind site shold have invited jcapitao as SiG Chair and you but TC said they wanted CentOS vs RDO | 14:24 |
| amoralej | ok | 14:25 |
| amoralej | there was public minutes for the meeting? | 14:25 |
| spotz | Recording hang on:) | 14:26 |
| amoralej | ack :) | 14:26 |
| spotz | #link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zeJG6Mujalo | 14:26 |
| amoralej | good | 14:27 |
| amoralej | thx | 14:27 |
| amoralej | i'll watch it | 14:27 |
| spotz | Sounds good, anything else on this topic or we'll move to your next | 14:28 |
| amoralej | so, i'm not sure about centos9-master-head, tbh ... | 14:28 |
| spotz | Why don't we table it until after you watch it. I won't be here next week though I'll be in Raleigh | 14:29 |
| spotz | We can always have a quick discussion in channel or on the mailing list if needed | 14:29 |
| amoralej | spotz, tbh i don't think one thing depends on the other | 14:29 |
| spotz | Ok | 14:29 |
| spotz | Does it hurt anything to create it? | 14:30 |
| amoralej | i mean having centos9-master-head will not help to have that kind of version stamp | 14:30 |
| amoralej | actually, not | 14:30 |
| amoralej | it's just to save effort and resources | 14:30 |
| amoralej | it may be a good oportunity for kkula to create her first dlrn builder :) | 14:30 |
| spotz | Then it has purpose! kkula will do it!:) | 14:30 |
| amoralej | as she's becoming our ftbfs master | 14:31 |
| amoralej | after se became our deps master | 14:31 |
| amoralej | :) | 14:31 |
| spotz | Learning is a good reason to do it so decision made. | 14:31 |
| amoralej | ok, lgtm | 14:31 |
| amoralej | kkula, ^ | 14:31 |
| amoralej | i need your +1 :) | 14:31 |
| kkula | ready to do the job! | 14:32 |
| spotz | #info kkula will make the centos9-master-head branch. If anyone would like to learn how as well reach out to amoralej and kkula | 14:32 |
| spotz | :) | 14:32 |
| spotz | #yopic Docs: status of https://www.rdoproject.org/use/ | 14:32 |
| spotz | I have cleaned it up a few times but not recently | 14:33 |
| amoralej | #topic Docs: status of https://www.rdoproject.org/use/ | 14:33 |
| amoralej | so, while reviewing a patch from jcapitao, i found some very old content | 14:34 |
| amoralej | there | 14:34 |
| PagliaccisCloud | O/ greetings everyone! | 14:34 |
| spotz | Hey PagliaccisCloud | 14:34 |
| amoralej | o/ PagliaccisCloud | 14:34 |
| spotz | amoralej: Maybe make a trello with your findings and we'll work through the list? | 14:35 |
| amoralej | so, i was thinking how much of that is useful, if we maintain it | 14:35 |
| amoralej | as it was created by component owners, most of the times, it'd be probably good to discuss with them | 14:36 |
| spotz | I think we should mauntain like the getting started or point to the upstream docs, which would leave us with only maintaining packstack | 14:36 |
| amoralej | as i guess there are upstream docs which has similar, but updated, content | 14:36 |
| amoralej | spotz, yes, that's exactly my thought | 14:37 |
| spotz | Like the tripleo and tripleoquickstarts | 14:37 |
| amoralej | yep | 14:37 |
| amoralej | #agrees we should maintain like the getting started or point to the upstream docs which wuld leave us with only maintaining packstack | 14:37 |
| amoralej | #agreed we should maintain like the getting started or point to the upstream docs which wuld leave us with only maintaining packstack | 14:38 |
| spotz | Some of the other stuff we'll need to go through, I know even upstream we've gotten a little lazy about making sure the deployment stuff is uptodate for release | 14:38 |
| spotz | I'll carve out some time for a look | 14:39 |
| amoralej | yeah, we are lazy :) | 14:39 |
| amoralej | btw | 14:39 |
| amoralej | #info we got a new document for packagers https://www.rdoproject.org/documentation/package-building-overview/ | 14:40 |
| amoralej | thanks kkula ! | 14:40 |
| spotz | Do we have it linked in yet?:) | 14:40 |
| amoralej | yes, it's in packagers main page | 14:41 |
| amoralej | btw, i just learn something new, --verbose-build, cool | 14:41 |
| amoralej | spotz, it's linked in https://www.rdoproject.org/documentation/rdo-packaging/ | 14:41 |
| spotz | Perfect! | 14:42 |
| spotz | #action spotz will look at the page and see where we can link upstream, remove for out of date, etc | 14:42 |
| spotz | So I don't forget:) | 14:43 |
| spotz | Any thing else on this? | 14:43 |
| amoralej | i also need to https://www.rdoproject.org/what/trunk-repos/ | 14:43 |
| amoralej | it still points to centos7 | 14:43 |
| spotz | #action amaralej to up date the trunk-repos page:) | 14:44 |
| spotz | Maybe one meeting we do as a video working meeting and just go through docs? | 14:45 |
| amoralej | or organize a docs day! | 14:45 |
| amoralej | that'd be good, i thik | 14:46 |
| amoralej | we can do video call session or something | 14:46 |
| amoralej | but, we'd need to ensure the procuedure to run docs locally works fine in current fedora before | 14:47 |
| spotz | Yeah, ok lets look at calendar dates and see what we can do. I'm traveling one week a month for the next few months but we'll find a date! | 14:47 |
| spotz | I'm excited even if it might just be us:) | 14:48 |
| amoralej | yes :) | 14:48 |
| spotz | Ok anything else on this right now? | 14:48 |
| amoralej | it's good to focus on docs one day | 14:49 |
| kkula | I'll also take part with pleasure | 14:49 |
| spotz | #action We will find a day and have a Docs Day!! All invited! | 14:51 |
| spotz | Ok moving on as we have 9 minutes | 14:51 |
| spotz | #topic Yoga SWAG | 14:51 |
| spotz | I got an update and actually appreoved the markup during this meeting. Long story short the factory emailed the vendor for some clarification and that email got lost:( We're looking at August and we might be on the new fullfilment system about then but hoopefully won't delay things further | 14:52 |
| spotz | #topic Next Week's chair | 14:52 |
| spotz | Volunteers?:) | 14:53 |
| amoralej | i can take it | 14:53 |
| spotz | Thanks amoralej and the section is already created:) | 14:53 |
| spotz | #topic Open Floor | 14:53 |
| PagliaccisCloud | Did I miss convo about PTG plans? Will RDO have presence? | 14:55 |
| spotz | I just started looking into that today, I haven't found anything yet for a social | 14:56 |
| spotz | We're also just starting investigating whether to have atleast a small OPS Meetup precense | 14:56 |
| spotz | So the answer is there will be something just don't know yet:) I did bring back the camera Rain used to do the interviews with but haven't tried to see if it even still works | 14:57 |
| spotz | I'll put the PTG on the schedule for in 2 weeks, hopefully I'll have had time to research more | 14:59 |
| spotz | And we're at time so thanks everyone for coming, PagliaccisCloud feel free to hit me up after the meeting to chat but honestly just started this morning. | 15:00 |
| spotz | #endmeeting | 15:00 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting ended Wed Jul 20 15:00:25 2022 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 15:00 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/rdo_meeting___2022_07_20/2022/rdo_meeting___2022_07_20.2022-07-20-14.01.html | 15:00 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/rdo_meeting___2022_07_20/2022/rdo_meeting___2022_07_20.2022-07-20-14.01.txt | 15:00 |
| opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/rdo_meeting___2022_07_20/2022/rdo_meeting___2022_07_20.2022-07-20-14.01.log.html | 15:00 |
| PagliaccisCloud | Good stuff, thanks everyone! | 15:01 |
| PagliaccisCloud | Not gonna bug you about it now but we can chat after you've got all of the info you need. Lmk if I can help track something down | 15:02 |
| amoralej | thanks spotz ! | 15:02 |
| spotz | PagliaccisCloud: Yeah I envisioned the hotel in the middle of no where but it's downtown.. but it's Columbus:) | 15:02 |
| spotz | Welcome amoralej Thanks as always for your participation! You too kkula, ykarel an PagliaccisCloud | 15:03 |
| *** dviroel is now known as dviroel|lunch | 16:06 | |
| *** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|out | 16:11 | |
| apevec | <amoralej> "the goal of centos9-master-..." <- ^ didn't read all back, IMHO master-head would not be worth it, we'd rather invest in monitoring what's coming to CS9 before it hits mirrors, and yes, that was a topic TC video meeting few weeks ago, there are few ideas | 16:21 |
| apevec | one is to be able to rsync from composes.stream.centos.org and have that available in opendev AFS (not ready yet, but centos infra said they'd work on it) | 16:22 |
| apevec | other is to monitor cs9 gitlab MRs before they even get merged, that way we'd caught this new sqlalchemy showing up all of a sudden | 16:24 |
| rdogerrit | Dariusz created rdo-infra/ci-config master: Print correct components with "all" argument https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/44084 | 16:51 |
| *** dviroel|lunch is now known as dviroel | 17:23 | |
| rdogerrit | Amy Marrich (spotz) created rdo-website master: Meetings updated for June and July https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-website/+/44085 | 19:05 |
| rdogerrit | Dariusz proposed rdo-infra/ci-config master: Fetch info about jobs from ZUUL https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/43303 | 19:33 |
| *** dviroel is now known as dviroel|afk | 19:34 | |
| rdogerrit | Dariusz created rdo-infra/ci-config master: Removed outdated releases https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/44086 | 19:56 |
| rdogerrit | Dariusz created rdo-infra/ci-config master: Skip jobs for promo of fcf18e1661b4add7eb1b3b2c761e1c63 https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/44087 | 20:37 |
| *** rlandy is now known as rlandy|biab | 21:10 | |
| *** rlandy|biab is now known as rlandy | 21:33 | |
| *** rlandy is now known as rlandy|bbl | 22:15 | |
| *** rlandy|bbl is now known as rlandy | 23:30 | |
| rdogerrit | Dariusz proposed rdo-infra/ci-config master: Skip jobs for promo of fcf18e1661b4add7eb1b3b2c761e1c63 https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/44087 | 23:35 |
| *** dasm|ruck is now known as dasm|off | 23:41 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!