Tuesday, 2022-07-12

rdogerritrdo-trunk proposed rdoinfo master: Bump rdoinfo wallaby tags to latest upper-constraints  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdoinfo/+/4378100:04
rdogerritrdo-trunk created rdoinfo master: Promote CBS tags update for xena-8s-release  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdoinfo/+/4395600:06
rdogerritrdo-trunk created rdoinfo master: Promote CBS tags update for wallaby-8s-release  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdoinfo/+/4395700:06
rdogerritrdo-trunk created rdoinfo master: Promote CBS tags update for victoria-8s-release  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdoinfo/+/4395800:07
*** rlandy|bbl is now known as rlandy00:17
*** rlandy is now known as rlandy|out00:20
*** dviroel|out is now known as dviroel01:56
*** dviroel is now known as dviroel|out02:18
*** ysandeep|holiday is now known as ysandeep04:14
rdogerritMatthias Runge proposed openstack/gnocchi-distgit wallaby-rdo: Drop python3-pandas from BR  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/openstack/gnocchi-distgit/+/4394506:28
*** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|afk06:31
*** dmsimard0 is now known as dmsimard06:44
*** amoralej|off is now known as amoralej07:13
jcapitao[m]amoralej: hi, wrt ^07:27
jcapitao[m]DLRN is building sable/4.407:27
jcapitao[m]instead of stable/4.307:28
jcapitao[m]because yoga tag is set for pinned job07:28
jcapitao[m]https://github.com/rdo-infra/rdo-jobs/blob/79e7d52490e9439d7ffb0368f814a1a717060d2f/zuul.d/jobs.yaml#L16107:28
amoralejjcapitao[m], ah, in ci07:29
amoralejright?07:29
jcapitao[m]yes07:29
jcapitao[m]pinned job can be apply only if all releases are pinned to same version IIUC, right ?07:32
amoraleji think we thought it mainly for master07:32
amoralejwould it be possible to make it work with all releases07:32
amoralejinstead to a fix one?07:32
jcapitao[m]you mean to have a pinned job for each release ?07:34
amoraleji mean that the job reads the pin for each release07:34
amoralejand adapt it07:34
amoralejinstead of getting it as a parameter07:35
rdogerritAdriano Vieira Petrich proposed openstack/validations-libs-distgit xena-rdo: Update to version 1.7.0 of the validation libs  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/openstack/validations-libs-distgit/+/4387607:38
apevecready to merge? https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/openstack/gnocchi-distgit/+/4394507:43
rdogerritAdriano Vieira Petrich proposed openstack/validations-libs-distgit victoria-rdo: Update to version 1.6.0 of the validation libs  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/openstack/validations-libs-distgit/+/4387407:44
jcapitao[m]amoralej: hmm, it's the default behavior https://github.com/softwarefactory-project/DLRN/blob/master/scripts/run_tests.sh#L10507:46
amoralejjcapitao[m], so you are afraid that patch is wrong for stable/4.3?07:47
jcapitao[m]yes as amqpd is not available in 4.307:48
jcapitao[m]i think it will fail during real build07:48
amoralejjcapitao[m], send a patch to rdo-jobs to adjust to wallaby07:49
amoralejand run with a dnm07:49
amoralejsorry07:49
amoralejnot dnm07:49
amoralejwith depends-on07:49
rdogerritAdriano Vieira Petrich proposed openstack/validations-libs-distgit wallaby-rdo: Update to version 1.7.0 of the validation libs  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/openstack/validations-libs-distgit/+/4387507:49
jcapitao[m]right, let's test that way07:49
jcapitao[m]apevec: I'll add a -W in the meantime07:50
rdogerritJoel Capitao created rdo-jobs master: DNM set wallaby tag for pinned jobs  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-jobs/+/4395907:53
rdogerritJoel Capitao proposed openstack/gnocchi-distgit wallaby-rdo: Drop python3-pandas from BR  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/openstack/gnocchi-distgit/+/4394507:54
*** ysandeep|afk is now known as ysandeep07:59
jcapitao[m]amoralej: it's failing, maybe we should add a conditionnal on version as a workaround ?08:03
amoralej on which version?08:04
amoralejah, the amqp one08:05
amoralejjcapitao[m], or create another job08:05
amoralejpinned-wallaby08:05
jcapitao[m]if version > 4.0 we include the amqpd 08:06
amoralej4.408:06
jcapitao[m]yeah but we should also do the same for xena then08:06
amoralejwell, given that wallaby is pinned at 4.308:06
jcapitao[m]sry 4.4 yes08:06
amoralejit's a bit weird08:06
amoralejbut ok, would work08:06
jcapitao[m]yes it'd be better to add job08:09
rdogerritJoel Capitao proposed rdo-jobs master: DNM set wallaby tag for pinned jobs  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-jobs/+/4395908:16
rdogerritAdriano Vieira Petrich created openstack/validations-common-distgit xena-rdo: Update to version 1.7.0  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/openstack/validations-common-distgit/+/4396008:21
rdogerritJiří Podivín proposed openstack/validations-libs-distgit rpm-master: Callback workaround removal  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/openstack/validations-libs-distgit/+/4280508:21
rdogerritJoel Capitao proposed rdo-jobs master: DNM set wallaby tag for pinned jobs  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-jobs/+/4395908:24
rdogerritJoel Capitao proposed rdo-jobs master: DNM set wallaby tag for pinned jobs  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-jobs/+/4395908:27
rdogerritAdriano Vieira Petrich created openstack/validations-common-distgit wallaby-rdo: Update to version 1.7.0  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/openstack/validations-common-distgit/+/4396108:32
*** soniya29|ruck is now known as soniya29|ruck|lunch08:35
rdogerritJoel Capitao proposed rdo-jobs master: DNM set wallaby tag for pinned jobs  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-jobs/+/4395908:36
rdogerritJoel Capitao created openstack/gnocchi-distgit xena-rdo: DNM test zuul template  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/openstack/gnocchi-distgit/+/4396208:40
rdogerritAdriano Vieira Petrich proposed openstack/validations-common-distgit xena-rdo: Update to version 1.7.0  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/openstack/validations-common-distgit/+/4396008:50
rdogerritAdriano Vieira Petrich proposed openstack/validations-common-distgit wallaby-rdo: Update to version 1.7.0  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/openstack/validations-common-distgit/+/4396108:51
*** soniya29|ruck|lunch is now known as soniya29|ruck08:55
rdogerritJoel Capitao proposed rdo-jobs master: Edit gnocchi project templates  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-jobs/+/4395909:09
rdogerritJoel Capitao proposed rdo-jobs master: Edit gnocchi project templates  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-jobs/+/4395909:12
rdogerritJoel Capitao proposed openstack/gnocchi-distgit xena-rdo: Drop python3-pandas from BR  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/openstack/gnocchi-distgit/+/4394409:22
rdogerritJoel Capitao proposed openstack/gnocchi-distgit wallaby-rdo: Drop python3-pandas from BR  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/openstack/gnocchi-distgit/+/4394509:23
rdogerritMerged rdo-infra/ci-config master: Rename centos-9-quay job to ubi-9-quay job  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/4375809:31
*** soniya29|ruck is now known as soniya29|ruck|afk10:18
rdogerritJoel Capitao proposed rdo-jobs master: Edit gnocchi project templates  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-jobs/+/4395910:19
rdogerritJoel Capitao created openstack/gnocchi-distgit rpm-master: DNM test template with master branch  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/openstack/gnocchi-distgit/+/4396410:21
*** rlandy|out is now known as rlandy10:27
rdogerritJoel Capitao proposed rdo-jobs master: Edit gnocchi project templates  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-jobs/+/4395910:30
*** soniya29|ruck|afk is now known as soniya29|ruck10:40
rdogerritJoel Capitao proposed rdo-jobs master: Edit gnocchi project templates  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-jobs/+/4395911:19
rdogerritJoel Capitao created openstack/gnocchi-distgit yoga-rdo: DNM test template with yoga branch  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/openstack/gnocchi-distgit/+/4396511:23
*** dviroel|out is now known as dviroel|rover11:29
rdogerritUser bshewale proposed rdo-jobs master: Reparent containers and  standalone-ipa multinode jobs  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-jobs/+/4389711:44
rdogerritDouglas Viroel created rdo-infra/ci-config master: Skip scenario010-kvm-internal-standalone-master job  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/4396611:51
*** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|break11:59
rdogerritMatthias Runge created rdoinfo master: Update gnocchi to the supported version  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdoinfo/+/4396712:15
*** amoralej is now known as amoralej|lunch12:40
rdogerritJoel Capitao proposed gating_scripts master: exist_in_koji written in python  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/gating_scripts/+/4390212:44
*** ysandeep|break is now known as ysandeep12:46
rdogerritJoel Capitao proposed gating_scripts master: exist_in_koji written in python  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/gating_scripts/+/4390212:46
rdogerritJoel Capitao proposed gating_scripts master: Add option to not update all files  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/gating_scripts/+/4395212:57
rdogerritJoel Capitao created deps/GitPython c9s-zed-rdo: Update to 3.1.27  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/deps/GitPython/+/4396812:57
*** dasm|off is now known as dasm13:02
rdogerritMerged rdo-infra/ci-config master: Skip scenario010-kvm-internal-standalone-master job  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/4396613:07
*** amoralej|lunch is now known as amoralej13:41
rdogerritJoel Capitao created config master: Make the job to be able to run periodically  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/config/+/4396913:51
rdogerritJoel Capitao proposed config master: Get change list from report-uc periodically  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/config/+/4396913:58
rdogerritJoel Capitao proposed config master: Get change list from report-uc periodically  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/config/+/4396914:06
rdogerritDouglas Viroel created rdo-infra/ci-config master: Revert "Skip scenario010-kvm-internal-standalone-master job"  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/4368714:13
rdogerritMerged rdo-jobs master: Edit gnocchi project templates  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-jobs/+/4395914:16
rdogerritMerged openstack/gnocchi-distgit wallaby-rdo: Drop python3-pandas from BR  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/openstack/gnocchi-distgit/+/4394514:32
rdogerritMerged rdo-infra/ci-config master: Revert "Skip scenario010-kvm-internal-standalone-master job"  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/4368714:47
jm1ykarel: hello :) you said we could simple use master versions of rpms in tripleo jobs by using different tags, e.g. zed instead of zed-uc. how do we use different tags? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/+/847419/comments/54ebf109_dba689e514:55
jm1rcastillo: fyi ^14:56
jm1oh, ykarel is off today. maybe amoralej has a hint how to do that? ^14:57
*** soniya29 is now known as soniya29|out14:58
amoralejjm1, i'm lacking some context but14:59
amoraleji guess he refers to using unpinned projects?14:59
amoraleji mean build from master branch, instead of pinned tags?14:59
jm1amoralej: yes, we want to run test without pinning openstacksdk and ansible-collections-openstack15:00
amoralejthat's the difference between zed and zed-uc15:00
amoralejso, zed-uc is zed with the pins applied according to upper-constraints versions15:00
amoralejwhile zed is unpinned15:00
jm1amoralej: how can we use zed instead of zed-uc?15:00
amoralejin projects.ini15:02
amoraleji'm not sure where it's set in those jobs15:02
amoralejit's in dlrn config15:03
amoralejdone by the job15:03
jm1amoralej: projects.ini? any example job or repo where i could look that up?15:03
amoralejcan you point me to a log?15:03
jm1amoralej: https://logserver.rdoproject.org/63/43963/2/check/periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-9-standalone-master/de5137b/15:04
amoralej[build-test-packages : drop in the templated version of projects.ini]15:04
amoralejhttps://logserver.rdoproject.org/63/43963/2/check/periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-9-standalone-master/de5137b/job-output.txt15:04
amoralejprobably there15:05
*** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|out15:05
amoralejmmm where are dlrn logs?15:05
amoralejactually, that job is not building any package, i'd say15:06
rdogerritMiguel Garcia created openstack/keystoneclient-distgit xena-rdo: Skip test_cms unit tests from %check  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/openstack/keystoneclient-distgit/+/4397015:07
jm1amoralej: yeah, the patch that ykarel commented on above added a zuul variable which allowed us to say which packages to build from source. testproject which lists two packages to build from git: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/testproject/+/3863915:08
amoralejjm1, so iiuc you want to add a tripleo job to gate changes in openstacksdk or ansible-collections-openstack?15:09
rdogerritMiguel Garcia created openstack/keystoneclient-distgit wallaby-rdo: Skip test_cms unit tests from %check  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/openstack/keystoneclient-distgit/+/4397115:09
rcastilloamoralej: we want periodic jobs that run on both latest openstacksdk and latest ansible-collections-openstack15:09
amoralejjm1, sorry, i need more context to understand it15:09
jm1amoralej: we want to add a tripleo job to ansible-collections-openstack repo which runs tripleo deployment with latest openstacksdk and given ansible-collections-openstack change, e.g. here: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/84485915:10
amoralejthen, you probably want to unpin it?15:10
rcastillo(rdo pins openstacksdk to an older version in master)15:10
amoralejwe pin openstacksdk to the version used in upper-constrains15:10
amoralejas we do for all the libraries15:10
amoralejso, the actual fix for that would be to unpin that in rdo15:11
jm1amoralej: yes but for testing our code we want to use non-pinned rpms in our tripleo job in ansible-openstack-collection15:11
amoralejso15:11
jm1amoralej: periodic jobs of tripleo ci should continue to use pinned rpms because else we would block everyone when we merge a breaking change15:11
amoralejso, wrt unping ansible-collections-openstack15:12
amoralejok15:12
amoralejjm1 but then, if you merge a change in upstream that requires a newer version on openstacksdk15:13
amoralejthat will break it15:13
amoralejso15:14
amoralejif you run a tripleo job in the ansible-collections-openstack repo15:14
amoralejthat will build a rpm with the in-flight patch15:14
amoralejso, that should be fine in that front15:15
amoralejwrt testing it with openstacksdk from master15:15
amoraleji see it more as a problem that as a solution15:15
amoralejas it'd allow to merge changes that will break periodic15:15
jm1amoralej: we need matching versions of openstacksdk and ansible-collections-openstack. tripleo ci jobs are pinned to older rpms of both.15:16
amoralejsorry, i don't follow you15:17
rcastillobasically master sdk and master collections aren't completely compatible yet. We want to have a pipeline that'll tell us when we're completely ready.15:17
rcastilloif we unpin sdk and collections right now, something _will_ break15:17
amoralejyes15:17
amoralejthat's why u-c was invented15:17
jm1amoralej, rcastillo: cannot type that fast, gimme some time^^15:17
rcastilloproblem is that breaking sdk is in upstream zed u-c, we pinned it in rdo15:18
rcastillowhich leaves us in a weird spot15:18
rcastillofor the collections15:18
amoralejmmm15:18
amoralejwhat that means "breaking sdk is in upstream zed u-c" ?15:19
jm1amoralej: in our ansible-collections-openstack repo we want to test our code with a tripleo job. this tripleo job currently installs the pinned openstacksdk which is too old. so we want a unpinned rpm of openstacksdk in our tripleo job in ansible-collections-openstack15:19
amoralejcurrent version is bad?15:19
rcastilloyes, 0.99.0 is in upstream u-c, we pinned rdo to 0.64 or something like that15:19
amoralejjm1, if it's too old, request a new release upstream and push it to u-c15:19
amoralejmmm15:19
amoralejthen, there must be some issue in rdo15:20
amoralejlemme check why we are not promoting it15:20
jm1amoralej: no, we cannot push a new version to u-c because this would break tripleo ci jobs15:20
amoralejwhat would break?15:20
amoralejah, we are in version-locked15:20
amoralejbut that's wrong15:20
amoralejthat may break other projects requiring openstacksdk15:21
amoralejwhat we need is to unbreack tripleo-ci with 0.9915:21
jm1amoralej: if we unpin openstacksdk (or raise its version) then tripleo ci jobs will use the new openstacksdk but the old ansible-collections-openstack rpm. this does not work.15:21
amoralejwhat's the problem?15:21
amoralejok, gimme a while to think15:21
rcastilloproblem is sdk has some breaking changes and we (collections maintainers) haven't had the time/resources to catch up15:22
jm1amoralej: we have not yet finished porting ansible-collections-openstack to the new openstacksdk (>=0.99.0) which is why openstacksdk is pinned <0.99.0 in zed-uc15:22
amoralejjm1, current master branch of ansible-collections-openstack is ready for openstacksdk-0.99?15:22
amoralejso15:22
jm1amoralej: nope15:22
amoralejso, you'd need to adapt it in a backwards-compatible way15:23
jm1amoralej: ansible-collections-openstack is not ready yet for openstacksdk 0.99.015:23
rcastillowe wanted a way to test master for both packages as a way to gauge when we reach compatibility15:23
jm1amoralej: nope, no manpower to adapt it backwards-compatible15:23
amoralejthen, you may need to do it blindly15:23
jm1amoralej: ansible-collections-openstack <2.0.0 works with openstacksdk <0.99.0 only. ansible-collections-openstack >= 2.0.0 works with openstacksdk >=0.99.0 only. but aoc 2.0.0 has not been released yet, we are not ready yet15:24
amoralejonce you have something that is ready, we can unpin both together15:25
jm1amoralej: yes, but it is harder: we have to patch tripleo as well for aoc 2.0.0 but for that we need this tripleo job in aoc repo15:25
jm1amoralej: you see, its a mess ^^15:26
amoralejyep15:26
jm1amoralej: what we need is a way to build unpinned rpms of ansible-collections-openstack and openstacksdk in a periodic tripleo based job in our aoc .zuul.yaml15:27
amoralejbut not periodic15:28
amoralejbut gate, right?15:28
amoralejwe don't want to unpin periodic?15:28
amoralejthat's messing me15:28
rcastilloamoralej: not for now15:28
rcastilloeventually yes15:28
amoralejlol15:29
jm1amoralej: check is important, once we have that periodic is easy15:29
amoraleji'm afraid you'll need to do some ad-hoc solution15:29
amoralejhardcoding somewhere to build ansible-collections-openstack15:30
amoralejfrom master15:30
rcastillohttps://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/+/84741915:30
amoralejbut again15:30
rcastillothis was the ad hoc solution15:30
amoralejif we are not unpining it, why do you want periodic?15:30
amoralejto test master a-o-c with master openstacksdk?15:30
amoralejso it's like non-voting periodic?15:30
jm1amoralej: lets take periodic aside for a moment and focus on check15:31
amoralejnon-voting -> not in component promotion15:31
amoralejok15:31
rcastilloamoralej: yeah exactly15:31
rcastillojm1: we do want a periodic line I think15:31
rcastillowhat tripleo-ci calls a "dependency line" basically15:31
rcastillonon voting, just to let us know what would break if we unpin, so we can fix it before15:32
amoralejso, how long do you think it will take you to get this up to a compatible way with 0.99?15:32
amoralejnote we are really in a very risky situation15:32
jm1rcastillo: yeah but for now i am just trying to figure out how to run a tripleo job without pinning in aoc. the tripleo dependency line thingy is separate, kind of15:32
amoralejanything may need openstack 0.99 now15:32
amoralejand block promotions for other components15:32
amoraleji'd try to focus on getting some minimal viable version of compatibility with 0.99 if that's possible15:33
jm1amoralej, rcastillo: we are talking about two separate things here... (gimme time to type ;) )15:33
jm1amoralej, rcastillo: (a) this tripleo based check job in aoc which we will use to develop aoc 2.0.015:34
*** marios is now known as marios|out15:35
jm1amoralej, rcastillo: (b) this tripleo dependency line thingy which afaiu will be used to port tripleo-ansible etc. to aoc 2.0.015:35
*** dviroel|rover is now known as dviroel|rover|biab15:36
jm1amoralej, rcastillo: wrt (a), this job is located in aoc's .zuul.yaml and runs on check etc. we need a way to build unpinned rpm's of ansible-collection-openstack (based on current patch that is being checked) and openstacksdk (latest code from sdk's master branch). how do we do that?15:37
jm1amoralej, rcastillo: what do you think?15:38
amoraleji'm not sure about the best way to do it, tbh15:39
rcastillomy two proposals for that was using a separate repo with sdk 0.99.0 and the build_test_packages hack15:39
amoraleji see it dificult by modifying existint build-test-packages15:39
amoralejas it will need a different config for dlrn for that package15:39
amoralejinject a new project which is not in the list of changes, etc...15:40
amoralejbut i'm not sure, tbh15:40
amoralejlet me think if we may consume the package created from outside15:41
amoralejof openstacksdk15:41
amoralejin the past we used to have a rdo trunk repo following master, but we didn't create it for cs9 as it was never actually used15:41
rcastilloamoralej: we can, I created a repo manually and uploaded it to images.rdoproject.org15:42
rcastilloand included it with quickstart, it's possible15:42
rcastillohttps://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/+/84537515:42
amoralejwell, but that may become obsolete15:43
rcastillomaybe we just set a periodic job that rebuilds just those two with dlrn?15:43
amoralejwe may stand up a dlrn builder for only that package15:44
amoralejlet me do a quick test15:44
jm1amoralej, rcastillo: why not build both packages on the fly like rcastillo's patch did? (see depends-on patch for impl details) https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/testproject/+/3863915:46
amoralejmmm that may be the easiest15:47
amoralejactually, the one for a-c-o will should not be added15:47
amoralejas it's the tested repo15:47
amoralejonly the openstacksdk15:47
rcastilloamoralej: yeah, that was more for the testproject15:47
amoralejyes, i understand15:47
amoralejlemme check the logs15:48
amoralejhttps://logserver.rdoproject.org/39/38639/22/check/periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-9-standalone-master-force-collection-master/fcf901d/logs/delorean_logs/component/clients/af/86/af86313c83f631d212ffc0a14e4bf00a6d058582_dev/rpmbuild.log.txt.gz15:49
amoralejthere we have 0.9915:49
rcastilloso you think we should go with this approach?15:50
amoralejso that's probably all we need :)15:50
amoralejyes15:50
amoralejwill be standalone jobs?15:50
amoralejwell, anyway, i assume if it's multinode or ovb, packages will be updated wherever needed15:50
rcastillofor now yes, we might test ovb later. But it should work as long as we build images, right?15:51
rcastilloright15:51
amoralejah, that depends on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/+/84741915:51
amoralejso that's where we close the circle :)15:52
amoralejso, artg_extra_change_list is a new variable15:52
amoralejthere is no way to "inject" changes in the original change list?15:52
rcastillonot that I can see, it gets overwritten at some point15:53
amoralejrcastillo, jm1 actually, isn't artg_change_list just an empty list initially?16:00
amoralejwe may just use that variable16:00
amoralejalthoug i'm not sure, tbh, i'm not very familiar with the details of that role16:01
jm1amoralej: except for the impl details, you agree that rcastillo's approach with build-test-packages is the way to go? no way we can simply switch from zed-uc to zed tag for both rpms in our job?16:02
amoraleji think the approach of https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/testproject/+/38639/22/.zuul.yaml is better16:02
amoralejand much easier16:03
amoralejto implement with current roles16:03
rcastilloamoralej: I tried doing that, didn't work, the logic in the role is hard to follow but it gets overwritten at some point16:03
rcastillohence the new var16:03
amoralejok16:03
amoraleji'd say in "artg_change_list: "{{ artg_change_list_prep }}"" it's overwriting the initial list16:05
amoralejactually, this is like adding a depends-on16:06
amoralejon a review in openstacksdk16:06
jm1amoralej: ok, so we know its not as simple as switching some tag. then we stick to rcastillo's patch and work on that. cool, thanks! 😎16:08
amoralejwdym "as switching some tag"?16:09
amoralejhttps://logserver.rdoproject.org/39/38639/22/check/periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-9-standalone-master-force-collection-master/fcf901d/logs/undercloud/home/zuul/dlrn.log.txt.gz16:10
amoralejthat's the dlrn log16:10
amoralejof that patch, imo it's a very clean solution tbh16:11
gthiemongeamoralej: jcapitao[m]: Hi Folks, could we force-merge https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/openstack/octavia-distgit/+/43788 ? centos8 job failed but it is no longer supported by Octavia16:41
amoralejactually we removed them16:41
amoralejrechecking it should clean it16:41
*** dviroel|rover|biab is now known as dviroel|rover16:42
rdogerritMerged gating_scripts master: exist_in_koji written in python  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/gating_scripts/+/4390216:51
*** amoralej is now known as amoralej|off16:54
gthiemongeamoralej|off: thanks!17:02
rdogerritMerged openstack/octavia-distgit rpm-master: Update Octavia spec for secure-RBAC  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/openstack/octavia-distgit/+/4378817:04
rdogerritLuigi Toscano created openstack/os-brick-distgit wallaby-rdo: Remove sysfs dependency (OSP only)  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/openstack/os-brick-distgit/+/4397217:18
rdogerritLuigi Toscano created openstack/os-brick-distgit wallaby-rdo: DNM Just a test, will centoss8 jobs work?  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/openstack/os-brick-distgit/+/4397318:31
rdogerritLuigi Toscano created rdoinfo master: Fix ansible-role-tripleo-modify-image yoga tag  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdoinfo/+/4397420:57
*** rlandy is now known as rlandy|bbl21:59
*** dasm is now known as dasm|off22:14
*** rlandy|bbl is now known as rlandy|out23:47
*** ysandeep|out is now known as ysandeep23:58

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!