| flwang | Eva-i: i would like to use blueprint | 00:02 |
|---|---|---|
| flwang | but for this case, we don't need a spec? | 00:02 |
| ryansb | I think we probably need a spec, since it's APIImpact | 00:05 |
| *** tej_ has joined #openstack-zaqar | 00:06 | |
| *** tej has joined #openstack-zaqar | 00:06 | |
| Eva-i | ryansb: websocket connection in web client opens just like this "var socket = new WebSocket('ws://localhost:9000/');", after opening connection zaqar and zaqar clients send headers inside serialized messages. There's no http, though it's better to use same names for headers as in http. | 00:07 |
| flwang | ryansb: sorry, i'm talking about the doc question Eva-i asked | 00:07 |
| Eva-i | flwang: only if you want, I'm lazy to write the spec, but of course I can ;) | 00:09 |
| *** tej__ has joined #openstack-zaqar | 00:10 | |
| flwang | Eva-i: personally, i don't think we really need a spec | 00:10 |
| flwang | if you can write a clear blueprint | 00:10 |
| ryansb | oh, ok, then yeah never mind | 00:10 |
| ryansb | I've got to head off - have a good night zaqarians | 00:11 |
| Eva-i | ryansb: me never mind? | 00:11 |
| Eva-i | ryansb: thank you for today, good night | 00:11 |
| ryansb | Eva-i: I mean flwang never mind about the spec for docs | 00:11 |
| Eva-i | ryansb: okay | 00:11 |
| ryansb | I crossed the conversational wires | 00:11 |
| *** tej_ has quit IRC | 00:13 | |
| *** tej has quit IRC | 00:13 | |
| Eva-i | flwang: should I describe in the blueprint only solutions or both problems and solutions? | 00:13 |
| *** tej has joined #openstack-zaqar | 00:13 | |
| flwang | Eva-i: problems and solutions if you don't want to write a spec | 00:19 |
| flwang | then a detailed blueprint would be nice | 00:19 |
| Eva-i | flwang: alright | 00:20 |
| *** tej has quit IRC | 00:20 | |
| Eva-i | flwang: if blueprint will be too fat, we can always convert it to spec. | 00:20 |
| *** tej has joined #openstack-zaqar | 00:20 | |
| flwang | do you think it's a huge blueprint? | 00:21 |
| flwang | if so, we may need to split it | 00:21 |
| flwang | i don't think spec and address the size issue | 00:21 |
| ryansb | flwang: can you review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/254926/ when you get a chance? | 00:22 |
| ryansb | ok, now I actually have to log off - see y'all tomorrow | 00:22 |
| flwang | sure, see you | 00:24 |
| Eva-i | flwang: the blueprint will have more text than the commit message in this patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/250582/ | 00:24 |
| Eva-i | flwang: I don't think the blueprint should be splitted, I saw in doc team very complex blueprints. | 00:26 |
| *** AAzza_ has joined #openstack-zaqar | 00:26 | |
| flwang | Eva-i: it's a good question for me. Personally, i don't want to let the spec adding more workload for you | 00:26 |
| flwang | but if you think a spec can make things more clear, then go for it | 00:27 |
| flwang | for document, i don't think we have a very strict rule | 00:27 |
| *** AAzza has quit IRC | 00:30 | |
| *** AAzza has joined #openstack-zaqar | 00:30 | |
| *** AAzza_ has quit IRC | 00:32 | |
| Eva-i | flwang: spec will make things more clear, because the commit message from my patch, which I want to include to blueprint text, is hard to read and it needs formatting. I believe specs exist exactly for that purpose - to format the blueprint message and add image inserts. | 00:36 |
| flwang | Eva-i: if you're happy,then i'm happy | 00:37 |
| Eva-i | flwang: in my blueprint there will be no images, of course. | 00:37 |
| *** tej has quit IRC | 00:37 | |
| *** tej__ has quit IRC | 00:37 | |
| Eva-i | flwang: =) | 00:37 |
| flwang | Eva-i: cool :) | 00:37 |
| *** openstackstatus has quit IRC | 00:50 | |
| *** openstack has joined #openstack-zaqar | 00:53 | |
| *** itisha has quit IRC | 01:16 | |
| *** lei-zh1 has joined #openstack-zaqar | 02:01 | |
| openstackgerrit | Eva Balycheva proposed openstack/zaqar: Make zaqar-bench use credentials from os_client_config https://review.openstack.org/255051 | 02:52 |
| *** Qiming has joined #openstack-zaqar | 02:56 | |
| openstackgerrit | Eva Balycheva proposed openstack/zaqar: Make zaqar-bench use credentials from os_client_config https://review.openstack.org/255051 | 02:56 |
| openstackgerrit | Eva Balycheva proposed openstack/zaqar: Make zaqar-bench use credentials from os_client_config https://review.openstack.org/255051 | 02:57 |
| *** sonuk has joined #openstack-zaqar | 03:05 | |
| *** sonuk has left #openstack-zaqar | 03:10 | |
| *** dmowrer has joined #openstack-zaqar | 03:19 | |
| *** dmowrer has quit IRC | 03:24 | |
| *** flwang1 has quit IRC | 03:55 | |
| Eva-i | flwang: ping | 03:58 |
| *** lei-zh1 has quit IRC | 04:26 | |
| *** lei-zh1 has joined #openstack-zaqar | 04:44 | |
| *** lei-zh1 has quit IRC | 05:02 | |
| *** boris-42_ has quit IRC | 05:03 | |
| *** Qiming has quit IRC | 05:22 | |
| openstackgerrit | Eva Balycheva proposed openstack/zaqar-specs: Support for binary data in the websocket transport https://review.openstack.org/249257 | 05:26 |
| *** Qiming has joined #openstack-zaqar | 05:27 | |
| Eva-i | flwang: I rethinked the problem of subscriptions. Such problem is hardly existing. I provided the explanation in the spec. If it's not really a problem, I can remove all mentions of this problem from thie spec. | 05:29 |
| *** lei-zh1 has joined #openstack-zaqar | 05:31 | |
| *** dmowrer has joined #openstack-zaqar | 05:46 | |
| *** dmowrer has quit IRC | 05:51 | |
| openstackgerrit | OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/zaqar: Imported Translations from Zanata https://review.openstack.org/250621 | 06:28 |
| *** rcernin has joined #openstack-zaqar | 07:20 | |
| *** flwang1 has joined #openstack-zaqar | 07:25 | |
| *** boris-42_ has joined #openstack-zaqar | 07:31 | |
| *** flwang1 has quit IRC | 08:00 | |
| *** flwang1 has joined #openstack-zaqar | 08:16 | |
| *** flwang1 has quit IRC | 08:49 | |
| *** flwang1 has joined #openstack-zaqar | 08:49 | |
| *** openstackstatus has quit IRC | 09:05 | |
| *** openstack has joined #openstack-zaqar | 09:08 | |
| *** dmowrer has joined #openstack-zaqar | 09:13 | |
| *** dmowrer has quit IRC | 09:18 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 09:32 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-zaqar | 09:32 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 10:02 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-zaqar | 10:02 | |
| *** lei-zh1 has quit IRC | 11:24 | |
| flwang1 | vkmc: flaper87: can you help review https://review.openstack.org/254926 ? | 11:35 |
| openstackgerrit | Fei Long Wang proposed openstack/zaqar-ui: Initial project creation https://review.openstack.org/255213 | 11:36 |
| ryansb | heyo, zaqarians | 11:55 |
| vkmc | heyo! | 11:58 |
| ryansb | vkmc: you should help fix the gate by reviewing https://review.openstack.org/#/c/254926/ :) | 12:05 |
| vkmc | ryansb, sure thing | 12:06 |
| flwang1 | ryansb: hi | 12:11 |
| flwang1 | vkmc: hello | 12:11 |
| flwang1 | vkmc: and https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/python-zaqarclient,n,z :) | 12:11 |
| flwang1 | i'm going to bed | 12:12 |
| flwang1 | btw, i just created our first ui patch, see https://review.openstack.org/255213 | 12:12 |
| flwang1 | but unfortunately, i'm not a good ui guy. the patch still needs some love | 12:12 |
| flwang1 | https://review.openstack.org/255213 | 12:12 |
| *** dmowrer has joined #openstack-zaqar | 12:16 | |
| *** dmowrer has quit IRC | 12:34 | |
| *** dmowrer has joined #openstack-zaqar | 12:34 | |
| *** boris-42_ has quit IRC | 12:43 | |
| *** dmowrer has quit IRC | 12:46 | |
| *** dmowrer has joined #openstack-zaqar | 12:47 | |
| *** dmowrer has quit IRC | 12:53 | |
| *** dmowrer has joined #openstack-zaqar | 12:53 | |
| *** dmowrer has quit IRC | 12:58 | |
| *** dmowrer_ has joined #openstack-zaqar | 12:58 | |
| *** dmowrer has joined #openstack-zaqar | 13:00 | |
| *** itxaka has joined #openstack-zaqar | 13:01 | |
| *** dmowrer_ has quit IRC | 13:03 | |
| *** dmowrer has quit IRC | 13:06 | |
| *** dmowrer has joined #openstack-zaqar | 13:07 | |
| *** dmowrer has quit IRC | 13:16 | |
| *** dmowrer has joined #openstack-zaqar | 13:18 | |
| *** dmowrer_ has joined #openstack-zaqar | 13:21 | |
| *** dmowrer has quit IRC | 13:23 | |
| Eva-i | hello | 13:24 |
| *** dmowrer_ has quit IRC | 13:36 | |
| *** dmowrer has joined #openstack-zaqar | 13:37 | |
| *** dmowrer has quit IRC | 13:41 | |
| *** dmowrer has joined #openstack-zaqar | 13:42 | |
| openstackgerrit | Rob Cresswell proposed openstack/zaqar-ui: Initial project creation https://review.openstack.org/255213 | 13:49 |
| openstackgerrit | Rob Cresswell proposed openstack/zaqar-ui: Initial project creation https://review.openstack.org/255213 | 13:51 |
| *** dmowrer has quit IRC | 13:52 | |
| *** dmowrer has joined #openstack-zaqar | 13:52 | |
| *** venkat_ has joined #openstack-zaqar | 13:54 | |
| *** dmowrer_ has joined #openstack-zaqar | 13:55 | |
| *** dmowrer has quit IRC | 13:57 | |
| *** dmowrer_ has quit IRC | 13:59 | |
| *** robcresswell has joined #openstack-zaqar | 14:00 | |
| robcresswell | o/ Hi folks. Just in case it wasn't seen in the Horizon chat, I've updated the UI patch to fix a couple of issues https://review.openstack.org/#/c/255213/ | 14:00 |
| robcresswell | It should load as expected within Horizon now. Fixed tests as well I believe. | 14:01 |
| vkmc | robcresswell, \o | 14:06 |
| vkmc | robcresswell, thanks for that | 14:06 |
| *** sriram has joined #openstack-zaqar | 14:10 | |
| *** sriram has quit IRC | 14:11 | |
| *** sriram has joined #openstack-zaqar | 14:12 | |
| Eva-i | robcresswell: thank you | 14:17 |
| *** dmowrer has joined #openstack-zaqar | 14:24 | |
| *** mpanetta_ has joined #openstack-zaqar | 14:27 | |
| *** amitgandhinz has joined #openstack-zaqar | 14:29 | |
| Eva-i | vkmc: can you please take a look at my updated spec https://review.openstack.org/249257 ? | 14:35 |
| *** dynarro has joined #openstack-zaqar | 14:50 | |
| *** tej has joined #openstack-zaqar | 14:51 | |
| *** tej_ has joined #openstack-zaqar | 14:51 | |
| Eva-i | Can you guys look at the second paragraph here: http://developer.openstack.org/api-ref.html ? How do you think, what status each Zaqar API have? | 14:56 |
| *** venkat_ has quit IRC | 14:58 | |
| robcresswell | Eva-i, vkmc: No problem :) | 14:59 |
| robcresswell | Ping me in #openstack-horizon if you need more help | 14:59 |
| ryansb | Eva-i: I think we'd consider v1 deprecated, v1.1. supported, and v2 current | 15:03 |
| ryansb | but definitely ask more people than just me | 15:03 |
| Eva-i | robcresswell: yes, sure ;) | 15:04 |
| *** robcresswell has left #openstack-zaqar | 15:04 | |
| Eva-i | ryansb: okay. If v2 is current, do you think it's "stable" (we will not make any backward incompatible patches)? | 15:05 |
| Eva-i | ryansb: I'm not sure, but I think I saw some patches for v2 API which are not backward compatible. | 15:07 |
| ryansb | not sure | 15:07 |
| Eva-i | ryansb: but maybe our next patches will be compatible. Yes, let's wait for the opinions of others. | 15:08 |
| ryansb | yup | 15:08 |
| *** wanghao has joined #openstack-zaqar | 15:09 | |
| *** lei-zh1 has joined #openstack-zaqar | 15:12 | |
| *** Qiming has quit IRC | 15:45 | |
| openstackgerrit | Ryan Brown proposed openstack/python-zaqarclient: First pass at CLI for signed URLs https://review.openstack.org/253731 | 16:01 |
| *** kgriffs|afk is now known as kgriffs | 16:18 | |
| *** kgriffs is now known as kgriffs|afk | 16:27 | |
| *** Eva-i has quit IRC | 16:27 | |
| *** Eva-i has joined #openstack-zaqar | 16:29 | |
| *** amitgandhinz has quit IRC | 16:32 | |
| *** amitgandhinz has joined #openstack-zaqar | 16:33 | |
| *** dmowrer has quit IRC | 16:48 | |
| *** lei-zh1 has quit IRC | 16:55 | |
| *** dmowrer has joined #openstack-zaqar | 17:05 | |
| *** rcernin has quit IRC | 17:11 | |
| *** dynarro has quit IRC | 17:39 | |
| *** amitgandhinz has quit IRC | 17:41 | |
| *** itxaka has quit IRC | 17:52 | |
| *** amitgandhinz has joined #openstack-zaqar | 18:06 | |
| *** amitgandhinz has quit IRC | 18:11 | |
| *** amitgandhinz has joined #openstack-zaqar | 18:12 | |
| *** dmowrer has quit IRC | 18:32 | |
| openstackgerrit | Eva Balycheva proposed openstack/zaqar: Make zaqar-bench use credentials from os_client_config https://review.openstack.org/255051 | 18:46 |
| *** flwang1 has quit IRC | 18:50 | |
| *** flwang1 has joined #openstack-zaqar | 18:51 | |
| Eva-i | Hello. I'm trying to make zaqar-bench able to work with keystone authentication. For some reason it gets stuck with keystone auth. It works only when I set "skip_queue_reset = True", i.e. zaqar/bench/conductor.py:40 method doesn't execute. What can be wrong? =/ | 18:53 |
| Eva-i | Here's my patch https://review.openstack.org/255051 | 18:53 |
| *** dmowrer has joined #openstack-zaqar | 18:54 | |
| *** flwang1 has quit IRC | 19:00 | |
| *** david-ly_ has joined #openstack-zaqar | 19:00 | |
| *** david-ly_ is now known as david-lyle_ | 19:03 | |
| *** david-lyle has quit IRC | 19:03 | |
| *** david-lyle_ is now known as david-lyle | 19:04 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/zaqar: Explicitly use asyncio protocol for websockets https://review.openstack.org/254926 | 19:16 |
| *** wanghao has quit IRC | 19:27 | |
| *** sriram has quit IRC | 19:31 | |
| *** sriram has joined #openstack-zaqar | 19:31 | |
| *** sriram has joined #openstack-zaqar | 19:31 | |
| *** sriram has quit IRC | 19:34 | |
| *** sriram has joined #openstack-zaqar | 19:35 | |
| *** flwang1 has joined #openstack-zaqar | 19:49 | |
| *** david-lyle has quit IRC | 19:58 | |
| *** david-lyle has joined #openstack-zaqar | 19:58 | |
| *** mpanetta_ has quit IRC | 20:04 | |
| *** dmowrer has quit IRC | 20:15 | |
| *** tej_ has quit IRC | 20:39 | |
| *** tej has quit IRC | 20:39 | |
| *** dmowrer has joined #openstack-zaqar | 20:58 | |
| *** dmowrer has quit IRC | 21:03 | |
| Eva-i | flwang: flwang1: ping | 21:39 |
| flwang | Eva-i: pong | 21:40 |
| Eva-i | flwang: hello, I saw your comment on my zaqar-bench patch(https://review.openstack.org/251023). This patch only allows Zaqar to work with Zaqar version before november 23(because this patch was merged: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/245526/). My new upcoming patch (https://review.openstack.org/255051) will make it work with latest Zaqar version. | 21:41 |
| Eva-i | flwang: sorry not Zaqar, but python-zaqarclient | 21:42 |
| flwang | Eva-i: did you mean with the first patch, benchmark still doesn't work? | 21:42 |
| Eva-i | flwang: yes, still doesn't work, but work with any python-zaqarclient version before november 23. | 21:43 |
| Eva-i | *works | 21:43 |
| flwang | Eva-i: hmm... | 21:46 |
| flwang | the title is "Fix zaqar-bench not working" | 21:47 |
| flwang | so is it possible to init the zaqar client as noauth | 21:47 |
| Eva-i | flwang: well, the title was true... and now it's not. I can change the title. | 21:47 |
| Eva-i | flwang: or yes, I can make zaqar-bench specify 'noauth' backend for the client. | 21:48 |
| flwang | that's my point | 21:48 |
| flwang | i think the fix should be able to get a workable noauth benchmark, right? | 21:49 |
| Eva-i | flwang: okay, going to implement it right away. | 21:50 |
| flwang | Eva-i: awesome, thanks | 21:50 |
| Eva-i | flwang: can you also look at the second paragraph here: http://developer.openstack.org/api-ref.html ? How do you think, what status each Zaqar API have? It's needed for API spec. | 21:51 |
| Eva-i | *API docs spec | 21:51 |
| flwang | current is v2 | 21:51 |
| flwang | supported v1.1 | 21:52 |
| flwang | as for v1, i think we haven't deprecated it | 21:52 |
| flwang | i will confirm with flaper87 | 21:52 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/zaqar: Remove version from setup.cfg https://review.openstack.org/252154 | 21:52 |
| Eva-i | So we will not make any backward incompatible patches to API v2 anymore and can just add new features? | 21:52 |
| flwang | i can't get your point | 21:55 |
| flwang | new feature != incompatible | 21:55 |
| flwang | we can add new features to v2, but not v1.1 and v1 | 21:56 |
| Eva-i | flwang: yes, "current" means new features, but no more incompatible changes. If we're planning to make some incompatible changes, v2 should be called "experimental". | 21:57 |
| Eva-i | flwang: basically, I'm asking, are we planning any incompatible changes? | 21:58 |
| flwang | Eva-i: nobody want to add incompatible changes | 21:58 |
| Eva-i | flwang: okay | 21:58 |
| flwang | but you know, software is a product of compromise | 21:59 |
| flwang | that said, we can't guarantee 100% | 22:00 |
| *** sriram has quit IRC | 22:00 | |
| Eva-i | flwang: you mean, if we find huuuge bug, we probably will need change the API in incompatible way? I understand. | 22:00 |
| flwang | since we're still evolving | 22:01 |
| flwang | Eva-i: yep, possibly | 22:01 |
| Eva-i | flwang: okay | 22:01 |
| flwang | you're smart, i think you can get my point | 22:02 |
| Eva-i | flwang: and that's what Ryan thinks: "v1 deprecated, v1.1. supported, and v2 current". You, me and Ryan think the same way about v.1.1 and v2. | 22:05 |
| Eva-i | flwang: I think I will omit API v1 in my API spec. | 22:06 |
| flwang | Eva-i: i think v1 is deprecated, but i'm 100% sure, since IIRC, rackspace is still using it | 22:06 |
| flwang | Eva-i: it's ok, you don't have to take care of v1 in your spec | 22:07 |
| Eva-i | flwang: also I updated my websocket spec: https://review.openstack.org/249257. I'm sorry, I decided not to do this: "maybe we can add a new reserved option for subscription to define the format". I came up with a new different solution, explained why I chosen it and added "reserved option" as alternative solution. If you will not like the new solution, I can quickly set "reserved option" as main solution. Sorry for so many messages, was just w | 22:15 |
| flwang | Eva-i: i will take a look, i always like the good idea, not mine :) | 22:16 |
| Eva-i | flwang: cool | 22:17 |
| *** david-lyle has quit IRC | 22:34 | |
| *** david-ly_ has joined #openstack-zaqar | 22:39 | |
| *** david-ly_ is now known as david-lyle | 22:45 | |
| *** boris-42_ has joined #openstack-zaqar | 22:59 | |
| openstackgerrit | Eva Balycheva proposed openstack/zaqar: Fix zaqar-bench not working https://review.openstack.org/251023 | 23:02 |
| *** amitgandhinz has quit IRC | 23:07 | |
| openstackgerrit | Eva Balycheva proposed openstack/zaqar: Fix zaqar-bench not working https://review.openstack.org/251023 | 23:10 |
| *** rcernin has joined #openstack-zaqar | 23:37 | |
| *** Qiming has joined #openstack-zaqar | 23:51 | |
| openstackgerrit | Eva Balycheva proposed openstack/zaqar: Refactoring of docs during Mitaka cycle https://review.openstack.org/250582 | 23:56 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!