Wednesday, 2016-01-06

*** harlowja_ has joined #openstack-watcher00:27
*** harlowja has quit IRC00:30
*** wootehfoot has quit IRC02:55
*** thorst has quit IRC02:56
*** thorst has joined #openstack-watcher02:57
*** thorst has quit IRC03:02
*** thorst has joined #openstack-watcher03:17
*** cjvolzka has joined #openstack-watcher03:38
*** cjvolzka has quit IRC03:41
*** Kevin_Zheng has joined #openstack-watcher03:57
*** thorst has quit IRC04:04
*** thorst has joined #openstack-watcher04:04
*** thorst has quit IRC04:13
*** thorst has joined #openstack-watcher05:10
*** thorst has quit IRC05:18
*** thorst has joined #openstack-watcher06:16
*** thorst has quit IRC06:23
*** jwcroppe has quit IRC06:38
*** thorst has joined #openstack-watcher07:21
*** thorst has quit IRC07:28
*** vincentfrancoise has joined #openstack-watcher08:23
*** thorst has joined #openstack-watcher08:26
openstackgerritMerged openstack/watcher: Remove useless Meta-Action  https://review.openstack.org/26372708:30
*** dtardivel has joined #openstack-watcher08:33
*** thorst has quit IRC08:33
*** thorst has joined #openstack-watcher09:31
*** thorst has quit IRC09:38
*** jwcroppe has joined #openstack-watcher09:39
*** jwcroppe has quit IRC09:43
openstackgerritJean-Emile DARTOIS proposed openstack/watcher: Provide a more dynamic Actions management solution  https://review.openstack.org/26371509:48
*** thorst has joined #openstack-watcher10:36
*** thorst has quit IRC10:43
*** Biswa has joined #openstack-watcher11:00
openstackgerritJean-Emile DARTOIS proposed openstack/watcher: Provide a more dynamic Actions management solution  https://review.openstack.org/26371511:16
*** vincentfrancoise has quit IRC11:19
openstackgerritJean-Emile DARTOIS proposed openstack/watcher: Provide a more dynamic Actions management solution  https://review.openstack.org/26371511:22
*** jwcroppe has joined #openstack-watcher11:24
openstackgerritJean-Emile DARTOIS proposed openstack/watcher: Provide a more dynamic Actions management solution  https://review.openstack.org/26371511:38
openstackgerritJean-Emile DARTOIS proposed openstack/watcher: Provide a more dynamic Actions management solution  https://review.openstack.org/26371511:39
openstackgerritJean-Emile DARTOIS proposed openstack/watcher: Provide a more dynamic Actions management solution  https://review.openstack.org/26371511:40
*** thorst has joined #openstack-watcher11:41
*** jwcroppe has quit IRC11:42
openstackgerritJean-Emile DARTOIS proposed openstack/watcher: Provide a more dynamic Actions management solution  https://review.openstack.org/26414211:47
*** thorst has quit IRC11:48
openstackgerritJean-Emile DARTOIS proposed openstack/watcher: Provide a more dynamic Actions management solution  https://review.openstack.org/26414212:54
*** vincentfrancoise has joined #openstack-watcher12:59
*** thorst has joined #openstack-watcher13:02
openstackgerritJean-Emile DARTOIS proposed openstack/watcher: Provide a more dynamic Actions management solution  https://review.openstack.org/26371513:28
Biswahttps://bugs.launchpad.net/watcher/+bug/1525854  error: invalid command 'ostestr'  despite virtualenvs have been recreated after adding new requiremen13:36
openstackLaunchpad bug 1525854 in watcher "Use os-testr instead of testr" [Wishlist,New] - Assigned to biswajeeban (biswajeeban)13:36
*** jwcroppe has joined #openstack-watcher13:38
*** wootehfoot has joined #openstack-watcher13:39
vincentfrancoiseHi Biswa13:40
openstackgerritJean-Emile DARTOIS proposed openstack/watcher: Provide a more dynamic Actions management solution  https://review.openstack.org/26417513:40
vincentfrancoiseI was actually making a comment on your bug and I just submitted it. So you can go have a look13:40
*** alexstav has joined #openstack-watcher13:42
BiswaHi vincent13:46
*** jwcroppe has quit IRC13:50
*** brunograz has joined #openstack-watcher13:51
vincentfrancoiseDid you have a look at the patchset link I've put? Did it help?13:51
*** alexstav has quit IRC13:52
Biswayes I have lookd at the links you provided13:52
*** alexstav has joined #openstack-watcher13:53
Biswaoh just recently you have sent me a link .Okay let me go through it once again13:54
Biswa@vincent I will do the needful as you suggested. Thank you very much for your kind guidance13:57
vincentfrancoiseBiswa: you're welcome13:58
sballemorning13:59
*** bzhou has joined #openstack-watcher13:59
*** jwcroppe has joined #openstack-watcher13:59
acabotmorning14:00
Biswa@Viincent .I am just beginning with openstack to learn , to explore and to contribute . So sometimes I may surely appear very stupid. hope you will guide me the way14:00
*** vtech has joined #openstack-watcher14:01
*** seanmurphy has joined #openstack-watcher14:01
openstackgerritJean-Emile DARTOIS proposed openstack/watcher: Provide a more dynamic Actions management solution  https://review.openstack.org/26371514:04
*** vmahe has joined #openstack-watcher14:05
*** cjvolzka has joined #openstack-watcher14:07
*** wootehfoot has quit IRC14:41
*** Biswa has quit IRC14:48
alexstavjed56: what code removing you were talking about? :)15:08
*** bzhou has quit IRC15:09
jed56https://www.irccloud.com/pastebin/GuGKUHlO/15:10
alexstavjed56: but there are another problem in applier/mapping/default.py15:14
alexstavhttps://github.com/openstack/watcher/blob/master/watcher/applier/mapping/default.py#L3715:14
alexstavjed56: why COLD_MIGRATE, but not LIVE_MIGRATE?15:15
jed56I agree but the mapping will also be removed15:16
alexstav:D15:16
jed56This is urgent ?15:16
jed56if yes you can make a fix15:16
alexstavNo :)15:16
alexstavBut it doesn't work on my stands without this fix. But I don't think it is urgent.15:17
alexstavThanks for the explanation.15:17
jed56you are welcome!15:22
*** srwilkers has joined #openstack-watcher15:27
edleafeJust had a discussion in #openstack-nova regarding calling the scheduler when moving instances15:33
edleafeThe clear answer to using RPC was "no".15:34
edleafethere was no alternative, though15:34
edleafeThere is a spec for adding a check_destination() call to migrations, though, which will run the target host through the scheduler to verify that it is valid15:35
edleafehttp://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/specs/mitaka/approved/check-destination-on-migrations.html15:35
edleafeSo probably the only option for us now is to select a host and call the migration. Eventually nova will be improved to disallow that if the host would not have accepted that instance originally15:36
edleafeBut for now we are limited by what nova can do.15:36
tpeoplesi think the notion of only being able to choose a host and have nova disallow it would be very inefficient15:39
tpeoplesjwcroppe:  ^ see above, and see nova channel15:39
edleafetpeoples: yeah, but that's slightly better than choosing a host that violates the original request15:46
tpeoplesedleafe: true.  regardless, either way looks like we have some work to do with the nova scheduler that we'll need to try and land in N to make sure we can get something that fits our needs15:51
*** vincentfrancoise has left #openstack-watcher15:57
*** vincentfrancoise has joined #openstack-watcher15:59
openstackgerritTaylor Peoples proposed openstack/watcher: Implement DevStack plugin  https://review.openstack.org/25458416:05
jwcroppetrying to follow... nova supports untargeted migration, which does call nova filters to ensure they 'pass' ?16:05
edleafejwcroppe: nope. Currently nova blindly migrates to whatever host you tell it to16:06
jwcroppeedleafe: yes, targeted... but it also has untargeted via an extension IIRC16:06
edleafethe spec involves persisting the request so that nova can re-run the filters to make sure that the target is OK16:07
jwcroppeedleafe: i.e., if you select host X, it will try to do the migration.  But I'm saying that in nova, if you do:  nova live-migration <vm>, it picks a host for you16:07
edleafecurrently nova doesn't persist the original request, so things such as (anti)affinity, etc., are lost16:07
edleafejwcroppe: yes, based solely on "does it fit"16:08
jwcroppeedleafe: yeah, and any other filters that may be enabled though?  And you're right on the affinity - we had to actually create our own proprietary filter to go back to the DB to check those16:09
edleafejwcroppe: all that "extra" stuff, like PCI, NUMA, etc., is not persisted now, so that causes problems.16:09
jwcroppemaybe an intermediate compromise here is to allow Watch to provide a filter extension point and folks can insert their own filter logic however they want, until Nova has an 'officially accepted' way to do this16:10
edleafeThis patch is adding the persistence: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/258628/16:10
edleafeyou can see the patch series involved16:10
jwcroppecool, I'll look.16:10
jwcroppeMy main concern is that we provide some mechanism for folks to allow Watcher to easily filter candidate hosts for migration if they know they're not acceptable16:11
*** alexstav has quit IRC16:48
*** jwcroppe has quit IRC16:48
*** alexstav has joined #openstack-watcher16:55
*** vtech has quit IRC17:07
*** seanmurphy has quit IRC17:15
*** vmahe has quit IRC17:27
openstackgerritAlexandr Stavitskiy proposed openstack/watcher: Making configurable [user|project]_domain_id  https://review.openstack.org/26428517:29
*** vtech has joined #openstack-watcher17:31
alexstavGuys, check please my patchset, that's my first experience working with gerrit. Is all ok? :)17:31
*** jwcroppe has joined #openstack-watcher17:48
*** alexstav has quit IRC17:57
openstackgerritSteve Wilkerson proposed openstack/watcher: Use graduated checked for doc formatting  https://review.openstack.org/26429418:18
*** harlowja_ has quit IRC19:18
*** harlowja has joined #openstack-watcher19:19
*** seanmurphy has joined #openstack-watcher19:26
*** seanmurphy has quit IRC19:26
*** wootehfoot has joined #openstack-watcher20:00
*** vtech has quit IRC20:47
*** srwilkers has quit IRC20:53
*** alexstav has joined #openstack-watcher21:43
alexstavtpeoples: Hi! How can I write comments in gerrit? As I see, a can write only Drafts. Do you see them? :)21:44
tpeoplesalexstav: hey, you have to hit the reply button from the main page of the specific review21:47
tpeoplesand then "post"21:47
*** dtardivel has quit IRC21:47
alexstavtpeoples: I clicked on your yellow comment, than push 'reply'. It creates 'draft'. Than I can only 'Save' and 'Discard' it.21:49
tpeoplesalexstav: save that comment.  then go back to the main page of the review and click the reply button21:50
openstackgerritAlexandr Stavitskiy proposed openstack/watcher: Make [user|project]_domain_id configurable  https://review.openstack.org/26428521:51
alexstavtpeoples: awesome! Thanks a lot! :)21:51
tpeoplesalexstav: np, it doesn't look like your comments got published though, only an edited patch set21:53
alexstavtpeoples: hm. I see only one 'reply' button at top of patch page. A clicked on it, then 'post' and nothing happens.21:56
tpeoplesalexstav: http://i.imgur.com/GybOEG3.png22:01
tpeoplesif you don't have any comments then post probably won't do anything22:02
*** Kevin_Zheng_ has joined #openstack-watcher22:04
*** Kevin_Zheng has quit IRC22:04
*** Kevin_Zheng_ is now known as Kevin_Zheng22:04
*** junjie has quit IRC22:05
*** junjie has joined #openstack-watcher22:07
alexstavtpeoples: Thanks a lot again :) The problem was, that I edited patch firstly.22:10
alexstavAna now my comments stuck in first patch version :D22:10
tpeoplesalexstav:  there is a test that you'll need to fix with your patch, that's why jenkins is giving it a -122:25
tpeopleswatcher.tests.common.test_keystone.TestKeystone.test_get_credentials22:25
tpeoplesneed to change the expected values from *_name to *_id22:25
alexstavtpeoples: yep, I have already fix that. Now the problem is how to push new file there. :D22:26
alexstavTo gerrit22:26
tpeoplesdid you amend your commit locally already?22:26
alexstavNo. I should change first commit?22:27
tpeopleswell, tbh i have never used the edit patchset feature in the new gerrit like you did yet.  you may need to pull down PS2 unless you have that locally?22:28
tpeoplesthere's a link provided under "Download" on gerrit22:29
tpeopless/link/command22:29
alexstavI amend commit. Maybe I should try to pull? :)22:31
alexstavpush22:31
tpeoplesdoes your local commit have the commit message changes?22:31
tpeoplessee http://docs.openstack.org/infra/manual/developers.html#updating-a-change22:31
alexstavMaybe I can remove PS2 in the gerrit and push it from local repo?22:34
tpeopleshmm i don't think gerrit allows you to remove a PS22:35
openstackgerritAlexandr Stavitskiy proposed openstack/watcher: Make [user|project]_domain_id configurable  https://review.openstack.org/26428522:35
tpeoplesthat looks like it worked22:36
* tpeoples notes that SERVERS_CONSOLIDATION is still used in some places when he thinks it should be BASIC_CONSOLIDATION now22:37
alexstavtpeoples: thx a lot. I'm sorry for stupid questions :)22:37
tpeoplesalexstav: thanks for helping22:40
*** alexstav has quit IRC22:42
*** alexstav has joined #openstack-watcher22:43
*** alexstav has quit IRC22:48
*** thorst has quit IRC22:54
*** cjvolzka has quit IRC23:08
*** thorst has joined #openstack-watcher23:40
*** alexstav has joined #openstack-watcher23:44
*** thorst has quit IRC23:45
*** alexstav has quit IRC23:50

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!