| *** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-valence | 04:00 | |
| openstackgerrit | Jinxing Fang proposed openstack/python-valenceclient master: Add node curd access api https://review.openstack.org/480341 | 04:00 |
|---|---|---|
| openstackgerrit | Jinxing Fang proposed openstack/python-valenceclient master: Add CLI node operation https://review.openstack.org/480346 | 04:17 |
| openstackgerrit | Jinxing Fang proposed openstack/python-valenceclient master: Add CLI node operation https://review.openstack.org/480346 | 05:51 |
| openstackgerrit | Jinxing Fang proposed openstack/python-valenceclient master: Add node curd access api https://review.openstack.org/480341 | 05:55 |
| openstackgerrit | Ananth Narayan S proposed openstack/valence-specs master: Add task queueing to address scalability https://review.openstack.org/474099 | 11:05 |
| *** ramineni_ has joined #openstack-valence | 14:21 | |
| *** ananth_n has joined #openstack-valence | 14:24 | |
| *** shuquan has joined #openstack-valence | 14:24 | |
| *** hubian has joined #openstack-valence | 14:28 | |
| ramineni_ | Hi All | 14:28 |
| mkrai | Hi ramineni_ | 14:29 |
| ramineni_ | hi mkrai | 14:29 |
| shuquan | hi | 14:30 |
| *** mrittika has joined #openstack-valence | 14:30 | |
| ananth_n | hi everyone | 14:30 |
| mrittika | hi | 14:30 |
| ramineni_ | ananth_n: you will chair the meeting today? | 14:31 |
| ananth_n | no. please go ahead | 14:31 |
| lin_yang | Hi everyone | 14:31 |
| ananth_n | you are the chair :) | 14:31 |
| ramineni_ | :) | 14:31 |
| mrittika | nate aren't you on leave? | 14:31 |
| ramineni_ | Everyone are here I guess, Lets start then | 14:31 |
| mrittika | ntpttr, i mean | 14:32 |
| ramineni_ | mrittika: you have 2 topics to disucss today, please go ahead | 14:32 |
| mrittika | yes. one is on :.networking genericswitch in Openstack - for physical switch management - Redhat recommened use this for redfish network. | 14:33 |
| mrittika | had a meeting with some if the redhat folks and they recommend we look at this "genericswitch" | 14:34 |
| shuquan | Nice | 14:34 |
| mrittika | has anyone seen the spec or code? | 14:34 |
| shuquan | I rememeber I aslo it last time | 14:34 |
| shuquan | memtion | 14:34 |
| shuquan | ironic multi tenancy function leverages networking genericswitch | 14:35 |
| mrittika | shuquan: how do we integrate that with Valence? | 14:35 |
| shuquan | we have a simple plan about it. | 14:35 |
| shuquan | networking genericswitch -> valence -> RSD Network API -> switch | 14:36 |
| lin_yang | shuquan: a driver in genericswitch for valence? | 14:37 |
| shuquan | we plan to do some poc later on. | 14:37 |
| shuquan | yes, i think so | 14:37 |
| mrittika | ok. it is integrated with Ironic I believe | 14:38 |
| mrittika | so then you can boot the switch and do any other sushy/redfish function too | 14:38 |
| shuquan | a driver in genericswitch which can control the switch by valence lib | 14:38 |
| ramineni_ | mrittika: do we already have bp registered for this feature in valence | 14:40 |
| shuquan | we have implemented a driver in genericswitch before. it's not easy to put valence and genericswitch together. we'd better design it carefully. | 14:40 |
| mrittika | no | 14:40 |
| mrittika | shuquan: agree | 14:40 |
| mrittika | ramineni_: do you want to take a look? | 14:41 |
| ramineni_ | mrittika: yes, | 14:41 |
| mrittika | shuquan: maybe you want to start a thread | 14:41 |
| mrittika | on your learnings | 14:41 |
| shuquan | mrittika: I'd like to :) | 14:44 |
| ramineni_ | shuquan: great | 14:45 |
| mrittika | ok cool! we have 2 eager Valencians! | 14:45 |
| ramineni_ | mrittika: :) | 14:45 |
| shuquan | I can start some discussion by offline mail first. | 14:45 |
| ramineni_ | shuquan: sounds good | 14:46 |
| ramineni_ | mrittika: anything more to discuss on this topic? | 14:46 |
| mrittika | no this is good | 14:47 |
| ramineni_ | moving on then | 14:47 |
| ramineni_ | #topic taskmanager for multi-podm | 14:47 |
| mrittika | yes. ananth_n what plans next? | 14:47 |
| mrittika | can we do a POC integration with Hubian's multi-pod | 14:48 |
| hubian | yeah | 14:48 |
| ananth_n | for that, we need the multi pod & pod scheduler support to be completed | 14:48 |
| ananth_n | or largely completed, let me say :) | 14:48 |
| mrittika | it is completed? ! | 14:49 |
| ananth_n | hubian is refactoring the code for multi pod support. | 14:49 |
| hubian | in progress | 14:49 |
| ananth_n | i.e. to get the various functions do the multipod lookup and then issue requests | 14:49 |
| lin_yang | for pod scheduler, the code is almost done, I will submit it today or tomorrow | 14:50 |
| lin_yang | wanna polish it before submit it :) | 14:50 |
| mrittika | lin_yang: Yay! | 14:50 |
| lin_yang | mrittika: do we have a target data for this poc? | 14:51 |
| mrittika | so can plan a series of steps leading to the POC | 14:51 |
| ananth_n | i have submitted the spec, please take a look and leave your comments. https://review.openstack.org/474099 even if we do a poc, i'd like it to have as much reusable code/design | 14:51 |
| ananth_n | and not be a throwaway prototype | 14:52 |
| mrittika | lin_yang: POC target was last week :) :) | 14:52 |
| mrittika | if we want to show a demo at the next summit, we need to work backwards | 14:53 |
| lin_yang | ananth_n: totally agree | 14:53 |
| lin_yang | okay, so this means we need to hurry up | 14:53 |
| shuquan | maybe we can also show the genericswitch support in next summit. :) | 14:54 |
| mrittika | hubian: do you have an occasion to demo multi-pd? | 14:54 |
| mrittika | in q3? | 14:54 |
| lin_yang | mrittika: this poc for task manager, or multi-podm? | 14:54 |
| mrittika | shuquan: yes, more the merrier :) | 14:55 |
| ananth_n | shuquan: +1 :0 | 14:55 |
| ananth_n | :) | 14:55 |
| lin_yang | shuquan: +1 | 14:55 |
| shuquan | let's hurry up! guys | 14:55 |
| mrittika | lin_yang: multi-podm using task manager | 14:55 |
| ananth_n | lin_yang: multi-podm + task manager is what mrittika is referring to | 14:55 |
| ramineni_ | hubian: is your code for multi-podm almost ready , or more work needed ? | 14:56 |
| mrittika | summit is Nov 7-8. we have time | 14:56 |
| hubian | mutile podm demoed in the commitment to intel but not public | 14:57 |
| mrittika | ok | 14:57 |
| lin_yang | if only poc for multi-podm, I think the task queue is not necessary. I mean for poc. For availability improvement, absolutely we need this task queue | 14:57 |
| mrittika | yes lin_yang that is the goal | 14:59 |
| mrittika | demo 1 should be about a "scalable controller" | 15:00 |
| mrittika | demo 2 "network switch and network service management in a diaggregated environment" | 15:01 |
| lin_yang | got it. let's make a steps plan offline for demo 1 | 15:01 |
| mrittika | lin_yang: thanks for taking this ownership | 15:01 |
| shuquan | we can also show the nvme features. :) | 15:02 |
| mrittika | shuquan: do you have HW for that? | 15:03 |
| lin_yang | true, storage is another important part in valence | 15:03 |
| ramineni_ | nice , so may topics :D for CFP , by the way the deadline for presentations is July14 | 15:03 |
| shuquan | mrittika: yes | 15:03 |
| mrittika | ramineni_: !!! thanks for reminding.. and this time it is in Sydney.. | 15:04 |
| shuquan | i'm drafting a abstract about nvme & networking features | 15:04 |
| ramineni_ | mrittika: right | 15:04 |
| mrittika | ramineni_: are you planning any abstracts or brown bag | 15:05 |
| ramineni_ | im planning for one | 15:06 |
| ramineni_ | on pooled resources management and vendor architecture, but not sure yet | 15:06 |
| mrittika | that's a good idea | 15:06 |
| mrittika | let us know who wants to collaborate with whom or going solo.. | 15:07 |
| ramineni_ | mrittika: good idea to colloborate :) | 15:08 |
| shuquan | collaboration makes better. :) | 15:08 |
| ramineni_ | do we want to maintain etherpad for all the topics? | 15:08 |
| lin_yang | how about we collect all topic proposal on etherpad | 15:08 |
| shuquan | good ideas | 15:08 |
| ramineni_ | lin_yang: +1 :) | 15:08 |
| ramineni_ | lin_yang: can u create one etherpad for the same ? | 15:09 |
| ramineni_ | or want to add in existing one itself? | 15:10 |
| lin_yang | maybe we can use the valence one, just add one section at the top | 15:10 |
| ramineni_ | lin_yang: ok, sounds good | 15:11 |
| ramineni_ | anyone have anymore topics to discuss? | 15:11 |
| ananth_n | none from me | 15:12 |
| mrittika | none from my side | 15:12 |
| ramineni_ | I think some valencelcient pacthes are up, | 15:13 |
| ramineni_ | and valence patches open for review | 15:13 |
| shuquan | none from me | 15:13 |
| ramineni_ | ok, then lets end the meeting early | 15:14 |
| shuquan | see you next week | 15:14 |
| shuquan | 88 | 15:14 |
| ramineni_ | Thanks All :) | 15:14 |
| *** shuquan has quit IRC | 15:14 | |
| lin_yang | thanks all, bye | 15:14 |
| mrittika | tahnks! | 15:14 |
| mrittika | bye | 15:14 |
| ananth_n | thanks, bye. | 15:14 |
| *** ananth_n has quit IRC | 15:14 | |
| *** ramineni_ has left #openstack-valence | 15:14 | |
| *** mrittika has quit IRC | 15:15 | |
| *** hubian has quit IRC | 15:46 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!