| *** bauzas_ is now known as bauzas | 01:26 | |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/governance master: Update DPL model reset steps https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/925926 | 01:55 |
|---|---|---|
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/governance master: Inactive state extensions: Monasca https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/923919 | 01:56 |
| opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/election master: Adding Takashi Kajinami candidacy for Storlets PTL https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/927235 | 07:24 |
| *** bauzas_ is now known as bauzas | 07:25 | |
| opendevreview | Pranali Deore proposed openstack/election master: Add Pranali Deore candidacy for Glance PTL 2025.1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/927237 | 07:43 |
| opendevreview | Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/election master: Artem Goncharov candidacy OpenStackSDK PTL 2025.1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/927244 | 09:05 |
| opendevreview | Wenping Song proposed openstack/election master: Adding songwenping candidacy for Cyborg https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/927246 | 09:42 |
| opendevreview | Wu Wenxiang proposed openstack/election master: Adding wu_wenxiang candidacy for Skyline https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/927252 | 10:11 |
| opendevreview | Wu Wenxiang proposed openstack/election master: Adding wu_wenxiang candidacy for Skyline https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/927252 | 10:14 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/election master: Add Grzegorz Grasza candidacy for Barbican 2025.1 PTL https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/927095 | 12:48 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/election master: Adding Takashi Kajinami candidacy for Heat PTL https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/927077 | 12:48 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/election master: Adding Takashi Kajinami candidacy for Puppet OpenStack PTL https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/927073 | 12:55 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/election master: Add Jake Yip candidacy for Magnum 2025.1 PTL https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/927072 | 12:55 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/election master: Add Martin Kopec candidacy for QA 2025.1 PTL https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/927094 | 12:55 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/election master: Sylvain Bauza candidacy for 2025.1 TC membership https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/927142 | 12:55 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/election master: Add Pranali Deore candidacy for Glance PTL 2025.1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/927237 | 13:05 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/election master: Adding Takashi Kajinami candidacy for Storlets PTL https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/927235 | 13:05 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/election master: Artem Goncharov candidacy OpenStackSDK PTL 2025.1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/927244 | 13:05 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/election master: Adding songwenping candidacy for Cyborg https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/927246 | 13:05 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/election master: Adding wu_wenxiang candidacy for Skyline https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/927252 | 13:05 |
| *** bauzas_ is now known as bauzas | 13:23 | |
| opendevreview | Ian Y. Choi proposed openstack/election master: [trivial] Utils: ignore 'to-be-released' tag value https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/927276 | 14:05 |
| opendevreview | Gregory Thiemonge proposed openstack/election master: Adding Gregory Thiemonge candidacy for Octavia https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/927278 | 14:27 |
| opendevreview | Walt proposed openstack/election master: Added Walt Boring candidacy for Cinder https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/927280 | 14:36 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/election master: [trivial] Utils: ignore 'to-be-released' tag value https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/927276 | 14:41 |
| *** bauzas_ is now known as bauzas | 17:03 | |
| gouthamr | tc-members: a gentle reminder that we're meeting here in ~13 minutes | 17:47 |
| spotz[m] | \o/ | 17:59 |
| gouthamr | #startmeeting tc | 18:00 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting started Tue Aug 27 18:00:29 2024 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is gouthamr. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 18:00 |
| opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 18:00 |
| opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'tc' | 18:00 |
| gouthamr | Welcome to the weekly meeting of the OpenStack Technical Committee. A reminder that this meeting is held under the OpenInfra Code of Conduct available at https://openinfra.dev/legal/code-of-conduct. | 18:01 |
| gouthamr | Today's meeting agenda can be found at https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/TechnicalCommittee | 18:01 |
| gouthamr | #topic Roll Call | 18:01 |
| gmann | o/ | 18:01 |
| dansmith | o/ | 18:01 |
| frickler | \o | 18:01 |
| spotz[m] | o/ | 18:01 |
| gtema | o/ | 18:01 |
| cardoe | o/ | 18:02 |
| slaweq | o/ | 18:02 |
| noonedeadpunk | o/ | 18:02 |
| gouthamr | nearly full house | 18:03 |
| gouthamr | courtesy ping JayF | 18:03 |
| gouthamr | alright; lets get started.. | 18:04 |
| JayF | o/ | 18:05 |
| cardoe | He was just talking to me in #-ironic so he'll hopefully be back. | 18:05 |
| gouthamr | first off; i wanted to thank frickler for chairing the last meeting.. i put him on the spot | 18:05 |
| gouthamr | #topic AIs from last week | 18:06 |
| spotz[m] | He did a great job! | 18:06 |
| gouthamr | ++ | 18:06 |
| frickler | ty | 18:06 |
| gouthamr | from what i can tell, we didn't mark any AIs specifically to follow up this week.. | 18:06 |
| gouthamr | i do see one to continue the licensing discussion at a forum/PTG session | 18:07 |
| gouthamr | i'll track this and plan it | 18:07 |
| gouthamr | did i miss any other AIs you were tracking? | 18:08 |
| gouthamr | regarding the licensing discussion, if anyone has ideas they'd like to put to paper, please do propose a resolution | 18:10 |
| gouthamr | taking silence to mean no further AIs | 18:11 |
| gouthamr | #topic OpenInfra event planning (spotz) | 18:11 |
| gouthamr | spotz[m]: had asked here a couple of days ago if anyone's going to be attending the OpenInfra summit in Suwon in-person | 18:11 |
| gouthamr | #link https://meetings.opendev.org/irclogs/%23openstack-tc/%23openstack-tc.2024-08-18.log.html | 18:11 |
| gouthamr | #link https://2024.openinfraasia.org/ | 18:12 |
| dansmith | bauzas: ^ | 18:12 |
| spotz[m] | Ahh so I think this is about the TC session in South Korea next week and then thinking of doing an overall leadership one at NA | 18:12 |
| fungi | worth noting that the "bridging the gap" forum session on the summit schedule is, as i mentioned in my ml post, an outcome of specific requests made by the tc to the openinfra foundation | 18:13 |
| gouthamr | +1 | 18:13 |
| fungi | so if tc members are in suwon and don't have conflicts at that time, participation is welcome | 18:13 |
| spotz[m] | Basically how I worded it for Asia was current, future(as the election won't be over), and past TC members to just come and answer any questions folks might have | 18:13 |
| gouthamr | so if there are people on the floor, we have two events we would appreciate your participation in | 18:13 |
| gouthamr | i'd go as far as "require" your participation in.. :) we need you. | 18:14 |
| spotz[m] | And potentially for NA it would be Board and TC members, or any other OpenInfra project leaders there | 18:14 |
| gmann | I will not be traveling either of events, otherwise would love to help | 18:14 |
| noonedeadpunk | same here | 18:14 |
| JayF | I will not be at either event as well. | 18:14 |
| gouthamr | i'm hoping to be at the NA event | 18:14 |
| JayF | Happy to participate in a remote session as long as we can make it work. | 18:14 |
| gouthamr | ^ i will try to work on this | 18:15 |
| fungi | i won't be in suwon, clarkb and ildikov are leading the forum session there, but i'm planning to lead a similar one in indianapolis for oid-na | 18:15 |
| spotz[m] | It is 13 hour time difference FYI I did look it up to see if I could do regular work meetings while there | 18:15 |
| spotz[m] | NA is possible if we do the session there | 18:15 |
| bauzas | I'll stick around if no conflicts | 18:16 |
| gouthamr | bauzas++ | 18:17 |
| bauzas | (tbc I'll be in suwon) | 18:17 |
| JayF | spotz[m]: I'll note my willingness to participate remote comes with a volunteer to be up at silly hours :) | 18:17 |
| JayF | (meaning I know if it happened, I'm probably going to be up at 3am or working at 9pm :D) | 18:17 |
| spotz[m] | Ok I'll see if we can, I know there will only be a single wifi so Asia may not end up working for remote but I believe NA will | 18:18 |
| spotz[m] | 6am CST I think | 18:18 |
| gouthamr | ack spotz[m].. is there a possibility to move the time for NA? or is it inflexible? | 18:20 |
| spotz[m] | Oh NA isn't even on the schedule:) That was the time translation for Asia | 18:20 |
| gouthamr | my bad | 18:21 |
| spotz[m] | I just know there's a slot on Oct 16 we may need something so offered this | 18:21 |
| gouthamr | thank you.. since there can't be a remote session from Suwon, won't matter :) | 18:21 |
| spotz[m] | I would say it may not be a good remote option | 18:22 |
| gouthamr | im hoping those attending can come back and brief us about the interactions | 18:22 |
| gouthamr | anything else to add about $topic spotz[m]? | 18:22 |
| gouthamr | thank you for repping us, and for putting the session together | 18:23 |
| spotz[m] | Nope, I'll report back after and update about NA | 18:23 |
| gouthamr | thank you; lets move to the next topic | 18:24 |
| gouthamr | #topic A check on gate health | 18:24 |
| gouthamr | anything going on this week? | 18:24 |
| gmann | about oslo.policy 4.4.0 u-c, only horizon yet to be fixed which I am working on. other projects fixes are either merged or up for the review | 18:26 |
| gmann | #linlk https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/requirements/+/925464 | 18:26 |
| gmann | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/requirements/+/925464 | 18:26 |
| JayF | no specific comments from me | 18:26 |
| slaweq | gmann: is it related to S-RBAC? | 18:26 |
| gmann | my target was last week to merge this but due to horizon failure it is pending. let's see how soon I can push fix and we can merge the requirement one | 18:26 |
| gmann | slaweq: yes | 18:26 |
| slaweq | so I also saw issue in the neutron-designate job which I need to investigate still | 18:27 |
| gmann | slaweq: and neutron designate job also which I am testing with some possible fixes but no success yet | 18:27 |
| slaweq | but it seems there is some issue related to s-rbac | 18:27 |
| slaweq | ahh, thx | 18:27 |
| gmann | it can be on designate side I think as there is change in config on neutron side but | 18:27 |
| gmann | *no change | 18:27 |
| gmann | I will discuss about it in neutron channel | 18:27 |
| slaweq | if you will have anything, please let me know | 18:28 |
| gmann | sure | 18:28 |
| slaweq | if I will find anything, I will also ping you | 18:28 |
| slaweq | but I will have probably time for it next week soonest | 18:28 |
| gmann | slaweq: this one is my debugging change, feel free to try things here | 18:28 |
| gouthamr | gmann: this requirement bump should merge this week? | 18:28 |
| gmann | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/926945 | 18:28 |
| slaweq | thx | 18:28 |
| gmann | gouthamr: I am not sure about deadline but as FF is this week, we should merge not later than that | 18:29 |
| gouthamr | i was understanding this is our requirements freeze week as well | 18:29 |
| gmann | I mean deadline for requirement change if there is any | 18:30 |
| gouthamr | #link https://releases.openstack.org/dalmatian/schedule.html#d-rf | 18:30 |
| gmann | yeah, requirement freeze also so yes this week is deadlin e | 18:30 |
| frickler | reqs freeze doesn't hold for bumping openstack deliverables | 18:30 |
| gmann | ohk | 18:31 |
| frickler | though that isn't an argument to delay things if that can be avoided | 18:31 |
| gmann | anyways I do not want to delay it just to avoid any last minute failure, though i tested/fixed ~15 projects on this so should not be any issue once we fix the horixon/neutron+designate job | 18:31 |
| gmann | frickler: ++ | 18:32 |
| gmann | that is all from me on this | 18:32 |
| gouthamr | okay; thank you gmann | 18:33 |
| gouthamr | anything else for this topic? | 18:33 |
| frickler | maybe on the aarch64 situation | 18:34 |
| opendevreview | Doug Goldstein proposed openstack/election master: Add Doug Goldstein candidacy for TC 2025.1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/927308 | 18:34 |
| frickler | we lost one of the donated clouds recently | 18:34 |
| fungi | one of the only two | 18:35 |
| dansmith | uh | 18:35 |
| dansmith | I thought there were at least three? | 18:35 |
| fungi | for aarch64/arm64? | 18:35 |
| slaweq | :/ | 18:35 |
| frickler | and the other one (osousl) seems to be severely slower, which we didn't completely realise before | 18:35 |
| fungi | only two (osuosl and linaro/worksonarm/ampere) | 18:35 |
| dansmith | oh for arm | 18:35 |
| dansmith | gotcha | 18:35 |
| dansmith | missed that part :D | 18:35 |
| frickler | so kolla already had to stop running image build jobs for that arch currently | 18:36 |
| frickler | I'm not sure how much other projects are doing testing there | 18:37 |
| slaweq | in neutron we are only running some UT jobs on arm IIRC | 18:37 |
| gmann | mostly it is UT jobs only | 18:38 |
| frickler | so more as an fyi, not much the TC can do about this I think unless someone can draw another cloud donor out of their head ;) | 18:38 |
| dansmith | I'll be honest and say I really don't know who cares about the arm bit | 18:39 |
| noonedeadpunk | oh well I do know | 18:39 |
| fungi | cloud providers with arm hardware who want people to use it more, maybe | 18:39 |
| JayF | There are multiple confirmed users in the Ironic community using Ironic on ARM to provision ARM and Ironic on AMD64 to provision ARM | 18:39 |
| dansmith | IIRC the jobs were added a while back by someone that cared during the brief (?) obsession with arm servers | 18:39 |
| noonedeadpunk | but probably not ones who can / in position to donate | 18:39 |
| gmann | note, most of UT jobs are non voting so not sure about their status or who monitor the status | 18:39 |
| JayF | dansmith: from my perspective, I still see ARM server usage on the rise, specifically in the AI/ML space. | 18:40 |
| noonedeadpunk | Talking about arm I do have a topic for open discussion | 18:40 |
| noonedeadpunk | (related to the user suvey) | 18:40 |
| gouthamr | https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/jobs with an "aarch" search tells me there's an ironic standalone job; and a "requirements-tox-py38-check-uc" (Run test for requirements project) job in addition to the kolla jobs | 18:40 |
| dansmith | JayF: ack, I heard a lot about it for like a year several years ago, but I haven't heard much of anything in a long time | 18:40 |
| JayF | yeah, I think the hype curve is falling off but as usual, actual use cases come flowing behind it without the hype :) | 18:41 |
| dansmith | just.. someone needs to care if they want it | 18:41 |
| JayF | ++ We have Ironic CI provisioning ARM-fake-BM-VMs on x86, which is really the case I'm more concerned about TBH | 18:42 |
| opendevreview | Michael Johnson proposed openstack/election master: Adding Michael Johnson candidacy for Designate https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/927309 | 18:43 |
| gouthamr | alright; lets wrap this up and move to the next topic | 18:43 |
| gouthamr | #topic 2024.2 TC Tracker | 18:43 |
| gouthamr | 18:43 | |
| gouthamr | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tc-2024.2-tracker (Technical Committee activity tracker) | 18:43 |
| gouthamr | ^ anyone chasing any item that has an update to share this week? | 18:44 |
| gouthamr | probably not; things are looking better.. i'll make another pass on the etherpad and clean things up | 18:45 |
| gouthamr | #topic Open Discussion and Reviews | 18:45 |
| fungi | i've tried to initiate a discussion on the mailing list about improving communication patterns around code review and related contribution based on efforts started by a request from tc members last year to find out why many foundation member organizations are struggling to get people more active upstream, so participation from the current tc membership on that thread is greatly | 18:45 |
| fungi | appreciated! | 18:45 |
| fungi | #link https://lists.openstack.org/archives/list/openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org/thread/GTPTFUPXXBDMWNQZGZDLM2IIX4FSTT5Y/ Bridging the gap between community and contributing orgs | 18:45 |
| gouthamr | fungi++ | 18:45 |
| noonedeadpunk | so I was pointed today that we're missing bunch of things on the user survey | 18:45 |
| noonedeadpunk | one thing - is relevant openstack releases - they stop on Antelope | 18:45 |
| fungi | oh, ouch | 18:46 |
| noonedeadpunk | While there's 2 more out | 18:46 |
| fungi | i'll make a note to ask aprice about that | 18:46 |
| noonedeadpunk | and another one - there's no KVM(aarch64) in list of used HVs | 18:46 |
| noonedeadpunk | so we actually have no idea if anyone cares about arm... | 18:46 |
| fungi | that definitely ties back into a recent discussion too! ;) | 18:46 |
| clarkb | noonedeadpunk: do we distinguish between x86 and non x86 hypervisors already? | 18:46 |
| clarkb | I think that is a good idea but the matrix is bigger than just x86 vs aarch64 kvm | 18:46 |
| noonedeadpunk | there's plenty of things there acvtually | 18:47 |
| noonedeadpunk | ppc64 is there for instance | 18:47 |
| fungi | maybe a worthwhile step would be to check with the nova team to get a list of relevant hypervisor+processor backend combinations | 18:47 |
| clarkb | got it | 18:47 |
| fungi | i wouldn't be surprised if it was last revisited 5+ years ago | 18:48 |
| dansmith | relevant or possible? :) | 18:48 |
| opendevreview | David Wilde proposed openstack/election master: Add Dave Wilde's candidacy for Keystone PTL 2025.1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/927310 | 18:48 |
| fungi | i suppose possible, and then we can find out which is relevant | 18:48 |
| * gouthamr probably missed an email asking for teams to update their questions for this 2024 survey | 18:48 | |
| noonedeadpunk | given we are still having essex among releases - that's a good question | 18:49 |
| dansmith | https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/doc/source/user/support-matrix.ini | 18:49 |
| dansmith | not sure where that gets rendered | 18:49 |
| fungi | as in, what target platforms does the nova team think deployments might be using, so they can find out how many are relying on what | 18:49 |
| dansmith | https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/user/support-matrix.html | 18:49 |
| dansmith | there we go | 18:49 |
| noonedeadpunk | as apparently some still might run lxc/hyper-v/etc | 18:49 |
| fungi | yeah, that would be a good one to sync up against | 18:49 |
| dansmith | for what I think people are using.. kvm on x64 :) | 18:49 |
| noonedeadpunk | (and kvm on aarch64) | 18:50 |
| * gouthamr corrects himself with link: https://lists.openstack.org/archives/list/openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org/thread/QX7TPBPUQWS3R4FYIV7CJFHML6GT2IZP/ | 18:50 | |
| fungi | keeping in mind that some deployments are still on train, so may care about platforms we stopped officially supporting many releases ago | 18:50 |
| dansmith | I'll take your word for it, but I haven't seen much evidence | 18:50 |
| dansmith | unless it just all works, which I don't believe :) | 18:50 |
| noonedeadpunk | yeah, so the reporter was unhappy about missing aarch64 as that's what they were running | 18:51 |
| fungi | i'm led to believe that there are public cloud providers offering aarch64 flavors | 18:51 |
| noonedeadpunk | and it does work eventually, yes | 18:51 |
| fungi | i definitely don't have a list in my back pocket, however ;) | 18:51 |
| noonedeadpunk | it's a bit tricky though to prohibit x86 to emulate aarch64 and get scheduled there, but it's a different question | 18:52 |
| gouthamr | noonedeadpunk: it could be worth starting an ML discussion regarding this, and copying aprice... adding new releases seems straightforward; but, mayyybe there are other inconsistencies that we need to fix | 18:53 |
| noonedeadpunk | well tomorrow is a deadline for the survey anyway... | 18:53 |
| gouthamr | don't know if its too late either because it'll mess up the analysis | 18:53 |
| gouthamr | yes | 18:53 |
| fungi | the survey "deadlines" are more like checkpoints | 18:54 |
| noonedeadpunk | just we kinda need to be aware about that for upcoming analysis I guess | 18:54 |
| slaweq | for this year's survey it is definitely too late but we should chagne it for next year | 18:54 |
| noonedeadpunk | ++ | 18:54 |
| noonedeadpunk | and acccount for upcoming releases during the year | 18:54 |
| noonedeadpunk | even though we might not know name - at least have versioned ones | 18:54 |
| slaweq | ++ | 18:56 |
| spotz[m] | e-dalmatian, f-dalmatian, g-dalmatian...:) | 18:57 |
| gouthamr | okay; it looks like we can take an AI to check with aprice about when the 2025 User Survey questions are due | 18:57 |
| fungi | the openstack user survey absolutely continues collecting submissions after the deadline, they just end up rolled into the next checkpoint | 18:57 |
| noonedeadpunk | good point... | 18:57 |
| fungi | but yes, for continuity it's best to batch the updates to questions themselves | 18:58 |
| gouthamr | ++ | 18:58 |
| gouthamr | alright, a couple of mins left, so i want to highlight something else while i still have folks here :) | 18:58 |
| fungi | which also reduces the workload on foundation staff maintaining the survey configuration and reporting | 18:58 |
| opendevreview | Jon Bernard proposed openstack/election master: Add Jon Bernard candidacy for Cinder PTL https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/927312 | 18:58 |
| gouthamr | Outreachy call for help | 18:58 |
| gouthamr | #link https://www.outreachy.org/blog/2024-08-14/outreachy-needs-your-help/ | 18:58 |
| gouthamr | #link https://www.outreachy.org/communities/cfp/openstack/ | 18:58 |
| gouthamr | ^ this is probably the first time in a looooong time that the Open Infra Foundation nor any participting OpenStack sponsors have donated towards an Outreachy internship | 18:59 |
| gouthamr | so, i wanted to check if any of you know anyone/company can pitch in | 18:59 |
| gouthamr | even if you don't have someone right away, please keep this appeal in mind :) | 19:00 |
| spotz[m] | I have not heard back on my request for funding | 19:00 |
| gouthamr | Outreachy runs three internship cohorts every year; so if we can swing funding for future ones, we can continue deriving benefits of this great program | 19:01 |
| gouthamr | i'd be happy to chat with anyone that needs any info regarding this | 19:01 |
| gouthamr | but, we're over time for this meeting | 19:01 |
| gouthamr | spotz[m]: thank you for trying!! :) | 19:01 |
| gouthamr | thank you all for attending | 19:01 |
| gouthamr | see you here next week! | 19:01 |
| gouthamr | #endmeeting | 19:01 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting ended Tue Aug 27 19:01:54 2024 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 19:01 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/tc/2024/tc.2024-08-27-18.00.html | 19:01 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/tc/2024/tc.2024-08-27-18.00.txt | 19:01 |
| opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/tc/2024/tc.2024-08-27-18.00.log.html | 19:01 |
| slaweq | o/ | 19:01 |
| gouthamr | ugh | 19:02 |
| spotz[m] | And funding company doesn't have to be the mentoring company if they don't have resources | 19:02 |
| gouthamr | slaweq: \o/ thanks for sending out the contributor emails | 19:02 |
| gouthamr | for all the projects that don't have PTL nominees | 19:02 |
| gouthamr | i am hoping its going to be effective | 19:02 |
| gtema | yeah, good job slaweq | 19:02 |
| spotz[m] | ++ | 19:02 |
| gmann | ++ thanks slaweq | 19:02 |
| gouthamr | but, its caused some fear too, especially in projects where there was some informal understanding of the current PTL re-nominating themselves :D | 19:03 |
| gmann | but it is good reminder as they have not nominated themselves yet? | 19:04 |
| gouthamr | but, even there, they appreciated the note from the election official that any project contributpr can run to be a PTL.. something that people probably don't realize often | 19:04 |
| gouthamr | gmann: that too | 19:04 |
| * gouthamr saw the skyline nomination, and sighed | 19:04 | |
| gouthamr | many people wait until the last day, as fungi once noted in the hope that someone else may decide to run :) | 19:05 |
| spotz[m] | I do think alot of the projects discuss in meeting who is running | 19:05 |
| fungi | i still like mtreinish's old threat, that he would nominate himself at the last minute for ever project that didn't have a nominee, with a platform of closing that project down | 19:06 |
| fungi | s/ever/every/ | 19:06 |
| gouthamr | omg | 19:07 |
| gtema | sometimes I have a feeling nobody would even notice that | 19:07 |
| dansmith | I'd notice if keystone went away | 19:07 |
| gtema | lol, sadly count of reviewers is terribly low | 19:08 |
| fungi | oh, yep, i did get a reminder that i could run to be keystone ptl! ;) | 19:08 |
| gtema | yeah, but too late, Dave created a change in the meanwhile | 19:09 |
| fungi | oh, he can have it in that case | 19:09 |
| fungi | i don't need extra headaches ;) | 19:09 |
| gtema | right, enough is enough | 19:09 |
| bauzas | don't be afraid about nova being leaderless, I'll do what needed if nobody else runs for the PTL seat | 19:18 |
| bauzas | I just leave that seat open to commnunicate my wish to pass the baton one day | 19:18 |
| frickler | cardoe: I see you proposed your TC candidacy, would you care to state your affiliation on your openinfra profile, please? | 19:23 |
| cardoe | frickler: absolutely. But where? https://id.openinfra.dev/accounts/user/profile has my company as Rackspace. https://www.openstack.org/profile/ has an Affiliation to Rackspace as well. | 19:30 |
| fungi | querying the openstackid-resources.openstack.org rest api for the corresponding e-mail address should hopefully return accurate affiliation information now, if it was just recently updated | 19:32 |
| spotz[m] | It's not tied to the old Stackalytics stuff is it? | 19:33 |
| frickler | cardoe: oh, after reloading I do see the info on https://openinfra.dev/a/community/members/155659 , it wasn't there when I looked earlier. so seems all is well now | 19:33 |
| fungi | spotz[m]: nope | 19:34 |
| spotz[m] | oh good! | 19:34 |
| cardoe | I don't see it on that page myself. | 19:38 |
| opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/election master: Add Dmitriy Rabotyagov as Vitrage PTL https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/927317 | 19:47 |
| opendevreview | Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/election master: Add Sylvain Bauza candidacy for Nova 2025.1 PTL https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/927319 | 20:00 |
| opendevreview | Dale Smith proposed openstack/election master: Adding Dale Smith candidacy for Adjutant https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/927325 | 20:58 |
| opendevreview | Carlos Eduardo proposed openstack/election master: Add Carlos da Silva candidacy for Manila PTL https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/927332 | 21:32 |
| opendevreview | Carlos Eduardo proposed openstack/election master: Add Carlos da Silva candidacy for Manila PTL https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/927332 | 21:33 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/election master: Adding Gregory Thiemonge candidacy for Octavia https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/927278 | 21:43 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!