Friday, 2022-10-14

*** frenzy_friday is now known as frenzyfriday|rover06:29
*** diablo_rojo is now known as Guest302206:33
*** elodille1 is now known as elodilles08:44
fricklerhmm, the official release announcement links to https://www.stackalytics.io/?release=zed , giving it some kind of official appeal, I wonder whether that is really a good idea09:00
fungihttps://openstack.biterg.io/ does seem to exist now, though i'm unsure what state of completion it's in11:22
*** pojadhav is now known as pojadhav|afk12:36
*** dasm|off is now known as dasm14:25
*** blarnath is now known as d34dh0r5314:32
ttxit is very likely not complete :)14:41
fungimy thinking as well. hopefully in the 2023.1/antelope release announcement we can link to it instead of stackalytics15:08
clarkbwell do we need to link to stackalytics regardelsss?15:08
fungii'm not sure we do link to it in our official announcement actually15:18
fungifrickler: i don't see a link to stackalytics in https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-announce/2022-October/002061.html15:18
fungiwhere did you find it?15:18
fungimaybe in some other release announcement that wasn't the official one?15:19
fricklerfungi: the "contributor stats" link in https://www.openstack.org/software/zed/17:12
fungioh, on the foundation's marketing site, not the project's official release announcement. got it17:13
fricklerwell to me that site looks very official, must be a good fake if it isn't ;)17:14
fungii expect the foundation will update it to the bitergia url i linked above once that service is fully ready17:14
fungiand yes, it's a little weird that the community at large doesn't manage the www.openstack.org site (which was historically the site for the foundation as well as being project-oriented). we can request changes for the content there however, and the people who maintain it are usually amenable to what we request17:16
fungiso if the tc were to decide that linking to stackalytics on that page is a bad idea, then requesting some specific adjustment would be perfectly reasonable17:17
fungijust be aware that it wasn't the tc or release team who decided to put the link there, it was a choice made by the openinfra foundation marketing folks17:19
fungithey won't necessarily be aware of nuanced concerns about stackalytics unless someone informs them17:20
gmanndansmith: noonedeadpunk can either of you +A on this https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-team-guide/+/86114118:47
fungigmann: i approved it18:54
fungilgtm18:54
gmannfungi: thanks 18:54
fungisure thing18:54
fungiit's a good clarification on the em policy18:54
gmann++18:55
opendevreviewMerged openstack/project-team-guide master: Clarify Extended Maintenance branch testing and support policy  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-team-guide/+/86114118:58
opendevreviewJay Bryant proposed openstack/governance master: WIP: 2021 User Survey TC Question Analysis  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/83688822:16
jungleboyjFirst set of updates pushed.  Need to finish some of the number and the summary.  Going to do this before the TC meets at the PTG.22:18
jungleboyjgmann: Do you remember why we didn't do an analysis of the 2020 survey results?22:19
gmann@jungleboyj: thanks for updates. For 2020 surevy, I cannot remember why we did not do, may be we just missed it. 22:20
jungleboyjWelcome.  I am going to finish that up on Monday hopefully.  22:21
gmannAck22:22
jungleboyjOk, there was a comment asking why we hadn't done that.  I don't know that it was a conscious decision.  Think it just got missed.22:22
jungleboyjNot sure if I want to mention that in the review or not.22:22
jungleboyjSorry this has taken so long.  The day job has gotten crazy.22:23
gmannNp! I understand. 22:23
*** dasm is now known as dasm|off23:58

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!