| *** opendevreview has joined #openstack-tc | 02:14 | |
| opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/governance master: Add resolution for ATC renamed to AC https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/794366 | 02:14 |
|---|---|---|
| *** gthiemon1e has joined #openstack-tc | 02:54 | |
| *** gthiemonge has quit IRC | 02:59 | |
| *** whoami-rajat has quit IRC | 03:06 | |
| tkajinam | I have one quick question regarding irc server migration. should be backport the change to replace freeenode by oftc ? | 04:03 |
| tkajinam | (I guess most of people are offline now so will follow up in ml later | 04:04 |
| *** vishalmanchanda has joined #openstack-tc | 04:29 | |
| *** zaneb has quit IRC | 04:34 | |
| *** zaneb has joined #openstack-tc | 04:34 | |
| *** abhishekk has joined #openstack-tc | 04:52 | |
| *** pojadhav- has joined #openstack-tc | 05:37 | |
| *** pojadhav has quit IRC | 05:41 | |
| *** ralonsoh has joined #openstack-tc | 06:01 | |
| *** slaweq has joined #openstack-tc | 06:16 | |
| *** pojadhav- is now known as pojadhav | 06:29 | |
| *** whoami-rajat has joined #openstack-tc | 06:43 | |
| *** slaweq[m] has joined #openstack-tc | 06:51 | |
| *** slaweq has quit IRC | 06:57 | |
| *** david-lyle has quit IRC | 06:57 | |
| *** slaweq[m] is now known as slaweq | 07:15 | |
| *** andrewbonney has joined #openstack-tc | 07:18 | |
| *** tosky has joined #openstack-tc | 07:20 | |
| *** rpittau|afk is now known as rpittau | 07:34 | |
| *** pojadhav has quit IRC | 07:44 | |
| *** pojadhav has joined #openstack-tc | 07:44 | |
| *** Guest646 has quit IRC | 08:07 | |
| *** lourot has quit IRC | 08:32 | |
| *** lourot has joined #openstack-tc | 08:32 | |
| *** Luzi has joined #openstack-tc | 08:52 | |
| *** pojadhav has quit IRC | 09:01 | |
| *** abhishekk has quit IRC | 09:24 | |
| *** odyssey4me has quit IRC | 09:51 | |
| *** odyssey4me has joined #openstack-tc | 10:10 | |
| *** bauzas has quit IRC | 10:23 | |
| *** bauzas has joined #openstack-tc | 10:23 | |
| *** pojadhav has joined #openstack-tc | 11:18 | |
| *** pojadhav has quit IRC | 11:43 | |
| *** akahat has joined #openstack-tc | 11:48 | |
| *** pojadhav has joined #openstack-tc | 12:04 | |
| *** Luzi has quit IRC | 12:32 | |
| mnaser | tkajinam: that's a really good question actually | 12:49 |
| mnaser | i think we should if possible, because the doc for previous releases are actually published | 12:49 |
| mnaser | tkajinam: we have a tc meeting today, this seems like a good thing to bring up. do you want to add it to the list or i can do that? :) | 12:50 |
| tkajinam | mnaser, could you bring up that topic. I'm afraid meeting happens at too late time in my tz :-( | 12:51 |
| mnaser | tkajinam: no problem. i will do that and i will make sure we get an update to ML | 12:57 |
| tkajinam | mnaser, thanks ! | 12:58 |
| mnaser | no problem :) | 12:58 |
| *** spotz_ has joined #openstack-tc | 13:04 | |
| *** spotz_ has quit IRC | 13:04 | |
| fungi | i guess the question is mostly specific to in-project contributor docs for branched projects. on the whole those were added fairly recently so hopefully only present in one or two stable branches | 13:06 |
| fungi | but also i wonder if it makes sense to publish branched versions of contributor docs, vs always redirecting to latest for them | 13:07 |
| mnaser | yeah i'd argue that contributor docs probably don't need to be branched as there's only one given functional state of them, and i dont think we need much of "how did we install things a few yers ago" :p | 13:08 |
| fungi | or more importantly "where were you able to reach us years ago" | 13:11 |
| mnaser | fungi: yeah but i guess that couldbe done with the preservaion of commit history | 13:20 |
| fungi | right, if anyone really needs to go looking back at contribution process for old releases there's always git history | 13:22 |
| fungi | and for the published version we might be able to come up with a simple redirect pattern for the docs site | 13:23 |
| fungi | assuming projects are using consistent urls for their contributor docs it could be a one-liner | 13:24 |
| fungi | in the .htaccess file in openstack-manuals with all the other redirects | 13:24 |
| *** tdasilva_ has joined #openstack-tc | 13:28 | |
| *** tdasilva has quit IRC | 13:28 | |
| *** thiago__ has joined #openstack-tc | 13:32 | |
| *** tdasilva_ has quit IRC | 13:32 | |
| TheJulia | random question, how long do we let the old channels sit before I don't know... pointing to the mailing list post? | 13:33 |
| *** zbitter has joined #openstack-tc | 13:36 | |
| *** zaneb has quit IRC | 13:42 | |
| *** zbitter is now known as zaneb | 13:42 | |
| *** abhishekk has joined #openstack-tc | 13:44 | |
| *** odyssey4me has quit IRC | 13:49 | |
| fungi | in my opinion it's probably fine to just guide people who start talking in channel about anything other than the move to oftc | 13:50 |
| fungi | or do you mean setting the channel topic to the ml archive url? | 13:50 |
| fungi | for the most part, i think the people left in a lot of the old channels are just zombie bouncer processes they haven't reconnected to in months/years | 13:51 |
| fungi | and may never | 13:51 |
| mnaser | fungi: i am redirecting at least 1-2 people a day in the channels im in right now | 13:55 |
| *** odyssey4me has joined #openstack-tc | 14:00 | |
| gmann | yeah we can discuss about backport and not just contributor doc but other doc also. | 14:03 |
| gmann | TheJulia: we will discuss that in today TC meeting. added question in etherpad | 14:03 |
| fungi | gmann: right, i'm mostly wondering what other docs besides contributor guides are going to mention irc channels, seems like there wouldn't be that many | 14:06 |
| gmann | In few projects I saw changes in other doc also but yes they are not many. releasenotes are ok as they are updated in master for all stable branch, specs are also updated which are also not branch specific | 14:08 |
| *** dklyle has joined #openstack-tc | 14:11 | |
| TheJulia | I was kind of surprised how few places it was actually referenced | 14:27 |
| *** diablo_rojo__ has joined #openstack-tc | 14:55 | |
| *** diablo_rojo__ is now known as diablo_rojo | 14:56 | |
| *** spotz_ has joined #openstack-tc | 14:59 | |
| *** belmoreira has joined #openstack-tc | 15:00 | |
| gmann | #startmeeting tc | 15:00 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting started Thu Jun 3 15:00:25 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is gmann. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 15:00 |
| opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 15:00 |
| opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'tc' | 15:00 |
| dansmith | o/ | 15:00 |
| gmann | tc-members: meeting time | 15:00 |
| mnaser | o/ | 15:00 |
| ricolin | o/ | 15:00 |
| diablo_rojo | o/ | 15:00 |
| belmoreira | o/ | 15:00 |
| spotz_ | I/ | 15:00 |
| gmann | #topic Roll call | 15:00 |
| gmann | o/ | 15:00 |
| ricolin | o/ | 15:01 |
| gmann | one in Absence section : yoctozepto would not be able join due to holiday | 15:01 |
| gmann | let's start | 15:02 |
| jungleboyj | o/ | 15:02 |
| gmann | #topic Follow up on past action items | 15:02 |
| gmann | two action item | 15:02 |
| gmann | gmann to push the resolution for ATC/AC terms | 15:02 |
| gmann | I did push this #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/794366 | 15:02 |
| gmann | please review | 15:02 |
| gmann | this is basically recording that ATC is now renamed to AC | 15:03 |
| gmann | next action item is 'ricolin to start testing patch for TLS and send on ML.' | 15:03 |
| gmann | ricolin: any update | 15:03 |
| ricolin | #link https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22exame-tls-proxy%22+(status:open%20OR%20status:merged) | 15:04 |
| ricolin | not sending ML yet | 15:04 |
| ricolin | but do enable tls-proxy in several services | 15:04 |
| ricolin | but failed mostly | 15:04 |
| ricolin | not look in detail yet | 15:04 |
| gmann | ok | 15:04 |
| gmann | ricolin: you want to continue this as Action item or just keep testing it ? | 15:05 |
| ricolin | still need this action item | 15:05 |
| gmann | sure | 15:06 |
| gmann | #action ricolin to continue testing patch for TLS and send on ML. | 15:06 |
| gmann | #topic Gate health check (dansmith/yoctozepto) | 15:06 |
| gmann | dansmith: any updates | 15:06 |
| dansmith | the number one thing I've seen in the last week is cinder fails | 15:06 |
| dansmith | we had some hiccup with some subset of workers yesterday for less than an hour, but that was quickly resolved | 15:07 |
| dansmith | so I think cinder fails are the only kinda systemic thing I've noticed | 15:07 |
| gmann | i saw that in morning on one of my nova patch too | 15:07 |
| jungleboyj | :-( | 15:07 |
| jungleboyj | So Cinder is still the problem child. | 15:07 |
| *** jentoio has quit IRC | 15:08 | |
| jungleboyj | Shouldn't be surprised given our logo. :-) | 15:08 |
| spotz_ | Pot Cinder | 15:08 |
| *** abhishekk has quit IRC | 15:08 | |
| dansmith | other than that I don't have much to report | 15:08 |
| gmann | ok, thanks | 15:08 |
| spotz_ | Poor even | 15:08 |
| jungleboyj | :-) | 15:08 |
| *** abhishekk has joined #openstack-tc | 15:08 | |
| gmann | other one is issue on devstack with ovn default. horizon integration jobs is also failed | 15:08 |
| *** abhishekk has quit IRC | 15:08 | |
| jungleboyj | I will chat with rosmaita again. | 15:08 |
| gmann | fixes are up on devstack side, hope we can merge them soon | 15:09 |
| gmann | jungleboyj: thanks | 15:09 |
| dansmith | gmann: oh yeah, forgot about that one | 15:09 |
| gmann | dansmith: yeah I will review that today. we have testing patch also up. | 15:10 |
| dansmith | cool | 15:10 |
| gmann | let's move to next topic | 15:10 |
| gmann | #topic Migration from 'Freenode' to 'OFTC' (gmann) | 15:10 |
| jungleboyj | \o/ Success | 15:11 |
| gmann | as you know bot and logs are done. | 15:11 |
| dansmith | although I didn't realize there are still meetbot issues | 15:11 |
| gmann | but we have more work to do on this especially on communication part | 15:11 |
| fungi | not really issues, it just doesn't edit the channel topic currently | 15:11 |
| dansmith | I think most people are not on service-discuss, so hadn't seen some announcement about it there | 15:11 |
| spotz_ | Yeah I haven’t seen any issues | 15:11 |
| dansmith | fungi: yeah, it just looks like it's not working | 15:11 |
| fungi | it still annotates the meeting minutes with the topics you declare | 15:11 |
| fungi | the difference in oftc's channel permissions model makes the old method meetbot used for that complicated, but we've got a long-pending rewrite of the meetbot onto a new framework which is finally underway as of this week, and we'll implement a better solution in that | 15:12 |
| dansmith | sweet | 15:13 |
| gmann | nice | 15:13 |
| gmann | I have created this etehrpad for tracking all work #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/openstack-irc-migration-to-oftc | 15:13 |
| gmann | if you find some of the item missing, feel free to add | 15:14 |
| jungleboyj | fungi: Thank you for all your efforts! | 15:14 |
| fungi | it was a group effort, but you're welcome! | 15:14 |
| spotz_ | +2 | 15:14 |
| gmann | TC resolution is all set to merge today in evening or so #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/793260 | 15:14 |
| fungi | glad it was fairly painless for everyone | 15:14 |
| gmann | yeah smooth migration till now. | 15:14 |
| fungi | we do still need someone to reach out to sergey (i hear he's still at mirantis) about getting control of the #openstack-sahara channel, but the rest are fine now | 15:15 |
| gmann | fungi: yeah i was writting that | 15:15 |
| gmann | L15 in https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/openstack-irc-migration-to-oftc | 15:15 |
| gmann | fungi: did we send email to him or just ping on IRC ? | 15:16 |
| fungi | gmann: so far i only tried irc, it's been a lower priority for me | 15:17 |
| fungi | but maybe it's a higher priority for folks using that channel if one of them wants to try to get in touch with him | 15:17 |
| gmann | ok, I will add this to sahara meeting and ping jeremyfreudberg if they can reachout | 15:17 |
| gmann | yeah | 15:17 |
| fungi | i can probably eventually get around to e-mailing him myself, but my to do list is... lengthy | 15:18 |
| gmann | #action reachout to sahara team and PTL to get control of the #openstack-sahara channel | 15:18 |
| gmann | fungi: ^^ i will check it | 15:18 |
| gmann | #action gmann reachout to sahara team and PTL to get control of the #openstack-sahara channel | 15:18 |
| gmann | we two things to discuss about this migration | 15:19 |
| gmann | Backporting OFTC reference changes (mnaser) | 15:19 |
| mnaser | o/ | 15:19 |
| ricolin | jeremyfreudberg, ^^^ | 15:19 |
| jeremyfreudberg | ack | 15:19 |
| gmann | this came up in morning from tkajinam | 15:19 |
| mnaser | this morning (my morning anyways :]) we had a question if we should backport refs to irc | 15:19 |
| mnaser | my opinion: yes if possible | 15:20 |
| *** spotz_ has quit IRC | 15:20 | |
| gmann | yeah I think we should. people refer to stable release doc too | 15:20 |
| jungleboyj | Agreed. | 15:20 |
| gmann | mostly it is contributor doc but there are few other doc too | 15:20 |
| jungleboyj | Sometimes it is what comes up in google searches by default. | 15:20 |
| gmann | true | 15:21 |
| *** spotz_ has joined #openstack-tc | 15:21 | |
| fungi | however, separately, it's worth questioning whether publishing branched contributor docs is sane in the first place | 15:21 |
| fungi | if they all use consistent urls, we can probably add a single pattern-based redirect in the .htaccess file for the docs site to always send people to the latest contributor docs | 15:22 |
| gmann | doc is fine but CONTRIBUTING.rst in top for github repo need that right? | 15:23 |
| gmann | contributor/contributing.rst can be maintained in master only | 15:23 |
| fungi | are users likely to pay attention to the CONTRIBUTING.rst files on old branches? | 15:23 |
| diablo_rojo | ..I kind of doubt it? | 15:24 |
| fungi | i mean, it doesn't hurt to backport that stuff, it just doesn't seem like it's critical if folks are unlikely to look at the old versions | 15:24 |
| gmann | I do not know but we can keep it as anyone can do | 15:24 |
| dansmith | google often returns things of pike-era, FWIW | 15:24 |
| tkajinam | some projects mentions irc server in README.rst as well | 15:24 |
| tkajinam | I tend to go for "fix anything" style | 15:25 |
| gmann | I think if we keep doc/source/contributor/contributing.rst on master then should be mainly ok. | 15:25 |
| dansmith | probably because at peak hype, most things linked to docs of the day, which raises their rank | 15:25 |
| tkajinam | instead of setting complicated rules... | 15:25 |
| fungi | tkajinam: wow your projects must have no bugs left! | 15:25 |
| gmann | tkajinam: yes README also like in nova | 15:25 |
| gmann | fungi: it is about mentioning some meeting info or so with freenode info | 15:25 |
| gmann | so not bug actually | 15:25 |
| tkajinam | s/anything/everything/ | 15:26 |
| tkajinam | sorry :-P | 15:26 |
| tkajinam | fungi, I hooope so :-D | 15:26 |
| fungi | dansmith: yeah, addressing it in old docs, assuming web search engines are sending people to the docs site, can be handled by a redirect much more easily for a lot of it | 15:26 |
| gmann | should we ask project to remove doc/source/contributor/contributing.rst from stable then ? | 15:26 |
| dansmith | fungi: not sure what that means.. effectively removing old docs and redirecting to current? | 15:26 |
| gmann | becasue that is always referred to latest from stable branch too #link https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/stable/wallaby/CONTRIBUTING.rst | 15:27 |
| fungi | back to my old question, are people looking at old branches of the git repo (not old versions on the docs site)? | 15:27 |
| gmann | we have two file here top level CONTRIBUTING.rst which is kind of static and point to */latest/contributor/contributing.html | 15:28 |
| fungi | dansmith: if it's mostly the contributor docs in branched projects which are the problem, then adding a pattern-based redirect in the docs site's .htaccess file like we do for tons of other stuff. one line could cover all projects using the same url patterns | 15:28 |
| gmann | so keeping top level CONTRIBUTING.rst on stable does not harm anything | 15:28 |
| fungi | and would be one review to land instead of potentially hundreds | 15:28 |
| dansmith | okay, if it's just the contributor doc, then sure | 15:28 |
| gmann | but doc/source/contributor/contributing.rst on stable is not referred on stable | 15:28 |
| dansmith | having the contributor doc exposed on a stable branch is just asking for trouble anyway | 15:29 |
| jungleboyj | fungi: I am all for whatever the easiest and most visible solution may be. :-) | 15:29 |
| diablo_rojo | dansmith, I would agree. Outdated info potentially. | 15:29 |
| fungi | if we think lots of people are going to be finding old contact info on old git branches and in old docs other than the project contributor docs, then sure maybe the many hours of contributor and ci time to push and review and merge those changes is warranted, but do at least consider it as a cost/benefit ratio | 15:29 |
| fungi | there are still lots of projects with branches which mention the openstack-dev mailing list too, fwiw | 15:30 |
| diablo_rojo | ..and the general lack of spoons | 15:30 |
| fungi | and git.openstack.org site | 15:30 |
| jungleboyj | True. | 15:30 |
| fungi | and whatever else was a thing at one time but isn't today | 15:30 |
| gmann | for long term I think this is good way to remove from stable | 15:30 |
| jungleboyj | ++ | 15:30 |
| gmann | ok so- | 15:30 |
| mnaser | i mean imho i am in the school of thought of 'if you wanna do it, go for it, it would be nice' | 15:31 |
| fungi | my not-on-the-tc opinion is that projects are free to update that on old branches but telling them it's mandatory is questionable | 15:31 |
| mnaser | but maybe not 'please make sure you backport this doc change 6 release back' | 15:31 |
| gmann | remove the doc/source/contributor/contributing.rst and keep CONTRIBUTING.rst(this does not have freenode info) on stable instead of backporting OFTC change | 15:31 |
| gmann | backport everything else you changed for OFTC | 15:32 |
| dansmith | but, fungi is going to land some redirect for the contributor doc to make it all mostly hidden anyway right? | 15:32 |
| gmann | that we can sugegst to projects | 15:32 |
| gmann | redirect ? | 15:32 |
| gmann | oh on stable, yes | 15:32 |
| gmann | and we can ask projects to remove them with redirect | 15:33 |
| gmann | but when they have time so its a suggestion for long term easiness | 15:33 |
| mnaser | i think what fungi suggested is that, opendev infra will handle a global redirect | 15:33 |
| dansmith | we don't have to ask projects, I thought... fungi is going to do it globally? | 15:33 |
| dansmith | right | 15:33 |
| mnaser | and projects just need to rm -rfv contributor/contributing.rst | 15:33 |
| gmann | ok if that can be done globally its great | 15:34 |
| dansmith | personally, I'd not want to delete anything from git history | 15:34 |
| gmann | dansmith: then it may be outdated | 15:34 |
| dansmith | if it's being handled on the rendered site globally, I'd just say leave it and only people looking at git trees will see the old stuff | 15:34 |
| dansmith | it's the rendered page that is the most important, IMHO | 15:34 |
| dansmith | or just say "backport what you want, or delete it from your old trees, but neither are required" ? | 15:34 |
| fungi | mnaser: dansmith: it would just be a line in the .htaccess file in the openstack-manuals repo | 15:35 |
| fungi | but sure i can take a first shot at it | 15:35 |
| gmann | yeah | 15:35 |
| jungleboyj | Yeah, I think we should just go with the one liner change. | 15:35 |
| fungi | there's a ton of redirects already in openstack-manuals, which used to be maintained by the docs team | 15:36 |
| gmann | - backport the OFTC things and for contributing.rst remove the doc/source/contributing.rst for ling term | 15:36 |
| gmann | otherwise many project might need to do partial backport so let them backport as it is | 15:36 |
| gmann | and then they can remove it based on time | 15:36 |
| gmann | any other point on backport ? | 15:37 |
| gmann | next thing to decide is - 'Topic change on Freenode channel' | 15:37 |
| gmann | when we should do this ? | 15:37 |
| spotz | Will we just get the channel banned if we do? | 15:38 |
| dansmith | I think the freenode people have already made their mea culpa on over-reaction to these things | 15:38 |
| dansmith | so I think we can do it now and likely won't see a big reaction right? | 15:38 |
| gmann | spotz: may be so not sure but that is risk | 15:38 |
| dansmith | and if we do, meh | 15:38 |
| mnaser | i've been hanging around at channels pointing people over | 15:38 |
| mnaser | still see 1-2 people a day | 15:38 |
| fungi | yeah, that seems to be working so far | 15:38 |
| gmann | we can assume they will do some action as worst case | 15:38 |
| spotz | Centos channel names is now actually centos-has-moved:) | 15:38 |
| fungi | also my past experience is that most people who aren't paying attention in channels also don't look at the channel topic wherever it's displayed in their client anyway | 15:39 |
| mnaser | i feel as long as we're in the channels | 15:39 |
| mnaser | and we're ok with sending people over | 15:39 |
| mnaser | lets keep doing that until it clearly feels like we're doing it less often | 15:39 |
| gmann | and by this week all meeting should have happened on OFTC so that is good trigger also | 15:39 |
| gmann | we can keep it open for next week also and change topic on 11th June Friday ? | 15:40 |
| gmann | and until then continue redirecting people from there | 15:40 |
| mnaser | yeah could be a good idea | 15:40 |
| *** spotz_ has quit IRC | 15:41 | |
| gmann | ok, we can work on Topic change wording with fungi meanwhile. | 15:41 |
| gmann | other progress on project side doc/wiki can be seen in etherpad | 15:42 |
| fungi | yeah, if you do decide you want to update channel topics in all the openstack project channels, i can help do that | 15:42 |
| gmann | fungi: +1, thanks | 15:42 |
| gmann | anything else on OFTC? | 15:42 |
| fungi | not from me | 15:42 |
| mnaser | huge thanks to fungi for championing most of this | 15:43 |
| spotz | Not I | 15:43 |
| mnaser | the transition has been pretty darn flawless | 15:43 |
| gmann | yeah thanks again fungi | 15:43 |
| jungleboyj | Thanks! | 15:43 |
| fungi | it was a group effort from the opendev sysadmins and broader community, but on their behalf, you're welcome! | 15:43 |
| gmann | +1 | 15:43 |
| gmann | moving next | 15:43 |
| gmann | #topic OpenStack Newsletters | 15:43 |
| gmann | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/newsletter-openstack-news | 15:44 |
| gmann | I have added three key things thetre | 15:44 |
| gmann | there | 15:44 |
| gmann | anything else to add ? | 15:44 |
| spotz | I think those are the main things | 15:44 |
| fungi | i did already supply oftc migration wording to the newsletter editors earlier in the week | 15:44 |
| mnaser | i have a more of a market-y idea | 15:44 |
| mnaser | why dont we rephrase a 'critical help needed' to 'do you want to help operate ES at scale' or something along those lines | 15:45 |
| mnaser | either as learning/trying/etc | 15:45 |
| ricolin | gmann, will be good to also mention y cycle goal idea collecting | 15:45 |
| mnaser | seem a lot more 'come do this cool thing' rather than 'plz help we cant convince anyone to look at it' :p | 15:45 |
| gmann | mnaser: we can do whatever help us to get help :) | 15:45 |
| gmann | ricolin: that is good one to add but can we add more than 3? may be question to diablo_rojo ? | 15:46 |
| gmann | ricolin: but feel free to add it in Future one | 15:46 |
| ricolin | diablo_rojo, ^^^ question here:) | 15:46 |
| gmann | mnaser: feel free to reword that on etherpad | 15:46 |
| ricolin | gmann, will check | 15:47 |
| gmann | ricolin: the one in Future section will be added in next newsletter | 15:47 |
| gmann | diablo_rojo: when is deadline to finalize it? I think today? | 15:47 |
| diablo_rojo | deadline for the newsletter? | 15:48 |
| diablo_rojo | EOD (for US) today | 15:48 |
| ricolin | diablo_rojo, how many items we can added to newsletter | 15:48 |
| gmann | diablo_rojo: ok, I think we are ready with that. | 15:49 |
| ricolin | I do have a y cycle goal one can mention in newsletter, but I can added to feature list if three is the limit | 15:49 |
| gmann | * Future items | 15:49 |
| ricolin | ;p | 15:49 |
| gmann | let' move next and we can check on y goal addition if ok as per limit | 15:50 |
| gmann | #topic Open Reviews | 15:50 |
| ricolin | sure | 15:50 |
| gmann | #link https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/governance+is:open | 15:50 |
| ricolin | let me added to future items for now | 15:50 |
| gmann | please review those OFTC resolution is all set to merge today | 15:50 |
| gmann | ricolin: cool, thakns | 15:50 |
| diablo_rojo | There is no limit | 15:50 |
| gmann | one thing or OFTC i missed. | 15:51 |
| diablo_rojo | I just have to write it up lol so have a little pity on me | 15:51 |
| mnaser | gmann: fyi, i would reference https://review.opendev.org/q/projects:openstack/governance+is:open usually (projectS instead of project), there's some changes to other repos we should occasionally look at | 15:51 |
| diablo_rojo | I think that will already be mentioned elsewhere in the newsletter- the OFTC stuff | 15:51 |
| gmann | mnaser: ohk, that will help more. will fix that | 15:51 |
| gmann | renaming the #heat channel to #openstack-heat https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/heat/+/794596/1/doc/source/developing_guides/pluginguide.rst#647 | 15:52 |
| gmann | ricolin ^^ | 15:52 |
| gmann | this is good time to fix that like octavia did/doing ? | 15:52 |
| ricolin | gmann, +1 | 15:52 |
| ricolin | do I need to propose the patch myself? or we do have other automatic way to do it now:) | 15:53 |
| gmann | mnaser: even let me prepare query for all repo under TC, like openstack/ideas etc | 15:53 |
| mnaser | gmann: yes, good idea | 15:53 |
| mnaser | i think we can have project dashboards or soemthing with the newer gerrit but | 15:54 |
| mnaser | not my expertise =) | 15:54 |
| gmann | ricolin: I think fungi can answer that. working with opendev or so | 15:54 |
| fungi | i encourage you to skim through our accessbot channels list looking for other channels which need to be renamed or are no longer needed | 15:54 |
| fungi | #link https://opendev.org/openstack/project-config/src/branch/master/accessbot/channels.yaml OpenDev AccessBot channels list | 15:54 |
| gmann | that's all from me today. anything else from anyone ? | 15:55 |
| fungi | for example cloudkitty, tacker and tripleo don't use openstack- prefixes either, so is heat that much of an outlier? | 15:56 |
| TheJulia | personally, I could see ironic wanting #ironic, but we already moved *shrug* | 15:56 |
| mnaser | does oftc support channel forwarding | 15:57 |
| fungi | but if the heat tam wants to move from #heat to #openstack-heat then yeah, do similar to what the octavia team is doing | 15:57 |
| gmann | If heat team is interested to rename I think it is fine | 15:57 |
| fungi | mnaser: no, it doesn't | 15:57 |
| mnaser | aw, okay | 15:57 |
| fungi | mnaser: we have a new process up for review | 15:57 |
| fungi | #link https://review.opendev.org/794313 Update channel renaming instructions for OFTC | 15:57 |
| gmann | may be keep monitoring old channel for some time can help for forwarding-gap | 15:58 |
| fungi | yeah, the new process suggests an entrymessage as an available option for that too | 15:58 |
| gmann | let's close meeting. thanks all for joining. | 15:59 |
| gmann | #endmeeting | 15:59 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting ended Thu Jun 3 15:59:08 2021 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 15:59 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tc/2021/tc.2021-06-03-15.00.html | 15:59 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tc/2021/tc.2021-06-03-15.00.txt | 15:59 |
| opendevmeet | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tc/2021/tc.2021-06-03-15.00.log.html | 15:59 |
| spotz | Thanks all! | 15:59 |
| diablo_rojo | Thanks! | 15:59 |
| gmann | fungi: and topic change we can do at least | 15:59 |
| fungi | yep, that's also mentioned in the new process | 15:59 |
| gmann | +1 | 15:59 |
| ricolin | fungi, thx | 16:02 |
| ricolin | will do so | 16:02 |
| fungi | yw | 16:02 |
| *** rpittau is now known as rpittau|afk | 16:12 | |
| *** gthiemon1e is now known as gthiemonge | 16:20 | |
| opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/governance master: Add resolution for ATC renamed to AC https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/794366 | 16:21 |
| gmann | spotz: jungleboyj ^^ updated | 16:22 |
| opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/governance master: Add resolution for ATC renamed to AC https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/794366 | 16:22 |
| *** ralonsoh has quit IRC | 16:24 | |
| spotz | Thanks gmann | 16:25 |
| *** tdasilva_ has joined #openstack-tc | 17:37 | |
| *** pojadhav has quit IRC | 17:43 | |
| *** pojadhav has joined #openstack-tc | 17:44 | |
| *** thiago__ has quit IRC | 17:44 | |
| *** jentoio has joined #openstack-tc | 18:35 | |
| *** vishalmanchanda has quit IRC | 18:39 | |
| jungleboyj | Thanks gmann I reviewed again. | 19:04 |
| *** whoami-rajat has quit IRC | 19:10 | |
| *** ralonsoh has joined #openstack-tc | 19:16 | |
| gmann | thanks | 19:19 |
| *** thiago__ has joined #openstack-tc | 20:05 | |
| *** tdasilva_ has quit IRC | 20:05 | |
| *** spotz has quit IRC | 20:24 | |
| *** ralonsoh has quit IRC | 20:28 | |
| *** spotz has joined #openstack-tc | 20:47 | |
| *** tdasilva_ has joined #openstack-tc | 21:04 | |
| *** tdasilva_ has quit IRC | 21:05 | |
| *** tdasilva_ has joined #openstack-tc | 21:05 | |
| *** thiago__ has quit IRC | 21:10 | |
| *** andrewbonney has quit IRC | 21:14 | |
| opendevreview | Brian Rosmaita proposed openstack/governance master: Propose vulnerability:managed tag for os-brick https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/794680 | 21:47 |
| *** whoami-rajat has joined #openstack-tc | 21:56 | |
| *** tosky has quit IRC | 23:00 | |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/governance master: Replace freenode ref with OFTC https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/793864 | 23:06 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.2 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!