Thursday, 2021-05-27

*** timburke has quit IRC00:16
*** timburke has joined #openstack-tc00:18
*** thiago__ has quit IRC00:38
*** thiago__ has joined #openstack-tc00:38
*** thiago__ has quit IRC01:00
*** thiago__ has joined #openstack-tc01:01
*** thiago__ has quit IRC01:06
*** thiago__ has joined #openstack-tc01:07
*** thiago__ has quit IRC01:10
*** thiago__ has joined #openstack-tc01:10
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-tc01:15
*** tdasilva_ has joined #openstack-tc01:22
*** thiago__ has quit IRC01:24
*** melwitt has quit IRC01:55
*** melwitt has joined #openstack-tc01:56
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC01:57
openstackgerritGhanshyam proposed openstack/governance master: Add resolutions to mpve IRC network from Freendoe to OFTC  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/79326002:02
gmanntc-members ^^ recording today decision to resolution as official motion in TC02:03
*** melwitt has quit IRC02:09
*** melwitt has joined #openstack-tc02:10
openstackgerritGhanshyam proposed openstack/governance master: Add resolution to move the IRC network from Freendoe to OFTC  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/79326002:24
*** ozzzo has quit IRC02:50
*** yoctozepto has quit IRC02:50
*** johnthetubaguy has quit IRC02:50
*** jlvillal has quit IRC02:50
*** mrunge has quit IRC02:50
*** ozzzo has joined #openstack-tc02:50
*** jlvillal has joined #openstack-tc02:50
*** yoctozepto has joined #openstack-tc02:50
*** johnthetubaguy has joined #openstack-tc02:50
*** mrunge has joined #openstack-tc02:50
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-tc02:56
*** cloudnull5 has joined #openstack-tc03:15
*** cloudnull has quit IRC03:15
*** cloudnull5 is now known as cloudnull03:15
*** vishalmanchanda has joined #openstack-tc03:34
*** tdasilva_ has quit IRC04:16
*** tdasilva_ has joined #openstack-tc04:17
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC04:21
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-tc04:21
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC04:28
*** tdasilva_ has quit IRC04:40
*** tdasilva_ has joined #openstack-tc04:48
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-tc04:53
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC05:16
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-tc05:29
*** timburke has quit IRC05:32
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC05:35
*** mnasiadka has left #openstack-tc05:55
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-tc06:12
*** slaweq has left #openstack-tc06:16
*** mrunge has left #openstack-tc06:33
*** dklyle has quit IRC06:43
*** ralonsoh has joined #openstack-tc06:47
*** tosky has joined #openstack-tc07:18
*** rpittau|afk is now known as rpittau07:22
*** andrewbonney has joined #openstack-tc07:34
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC07:55
*** ttx has quit IRC08:33
*** ttx has joined #openstack-tc08:34
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-tc08:41
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-tc08:53
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC09:09
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-tc11:06
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC11:11
*** e0ne has quit IRC11:20
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-tc11:21
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-tc12:10
*** pojadhav is now known as pojadhav|brb13:05
*** e0ne has quit IRC13:24
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC13:35
*** thiago__ has joined #openstack-tc13:51
*** tdasilva_ has quit IRC13:54
*** pojadhav|brb is now known as pojadhav14:08
openstackgerritGhanshyam proposed openstack/governance master: Add resolution to move the IRC network from Freendoe to OFTC  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/79326014:36
openstackgerritGhanshyam proposed openstack/governance master: Add resolution to move the IRC network from Freendoe to OFTC  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/79326014:37
*** thiago__ is now known as tdasilva14:41
openstackgerritGhanshyam proposed openstack/governance master: Add resolution to move the IRC network from Freenode to OFTC  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/79326014:55
*** dklyle has joined #openstack-tc14:55
*** diablo_rojo has joined #openstack-tc14:57
gmanntc-members: meeting time15:00
gmann#startmeeting tc15:00
openstackMeeting started Thu May 27 15:00:17 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is gmann. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.15:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.15:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: tc)"15:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'tc'15:00
gmann#topic Roll call15:00
*** openstack changes topic to "Roll call (Meeting topic: tc)"15:00
gmanno/15:00
ricolino/15:00
dansmitho/15:00
yoctozeptoo/15:01
gmannlet's start15:02
gmann#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/TechnicalCommittee#Agenda_Suggestions15:02
gmannToday agenda ^^15:02
gmann#topic Follow up on past action items15:02
*** openstack changes topic to "Follow up on past action items (Meeting topic: tc)"15:02
gmannone AI15:03
gmanngmann to push the resolution for ATC/AC terms15:03
gmannI did not do that, will continue on this15:03
gmann#action gmann to push the resolution for ATC/AC terms15:04
gmann#topic Gate health check (dansmith/yoctozepto)15:04
*** openstack changes topic to "Gate health check (dansmith/yoctozepto) (Meeting topic: tc)"15:04
diablo_rojoo/15:04
dansmithtbh, I haven't pushed many patches in the last week (which is -> :( )15:04
dansmithso I don't have any gut feelings on things15:04
dansmithI know nova has a live migration spurious fail, but I don't think that is affecting anyone else15:05
*** tdasilva_ has joined #openstack-tc15:05
dansmithobviously there have been other "health" items to be dealing with :)15:05
gmannok15:06
spotzo/15:06
gmannI have not seen frequent failure this week.15:06
dansmithgreat15:07
gmannanyone has anything to share on gate health ?15:07
*** tdasilva has quit IRC15:07
yoctozeptonothing from me15:08
gmannUpdate about ELK help,15:08
gmannBoard will be discussing it in their meeting and we are also adding it as upstream investment opportunity15:08
dansmithcool15:09
yoctozepto++15:09
gmannabout openstack-health dashboard which need subunit2sql. if we get ELK help then mtreinish can help on maintaining subunit2sql15:09
gmannso if we are able to save ELK then we can save subunit2sql and o-h dashboard too15:10
spotzWe definitely need to let folks know of that aterfall15:10
spotzwaterfall even15:11
gmannyeah15:11
gmannlet's move next15:11
gmann#topic Planning for TC + PTL interaction (gmann)15:11
*** openstack changes topic to "Planning for TC + PTL interaction (gmann) (Meeting topic: tc)"15:11
gmann#link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tc-ptl-interaction15:11
gmannnot much feedback on etherpad about choosing option15:12
gmannif all agree, I would like to discuss here about it.15:12
gmannI feel we can go with option2 which is 'meet once in a release cycle'15:12
* mnaser late walk-in15:13
gmannwe can decide pre-PTG time or very first day of PTG15:13
gmannwhat other think about it?15:13
dansmithsounds good to me.. once per cycle, somewhere near PTG15:13
yoctozeptopre/post PTG definetely and once per cycle is enough15:13
yoctozeptoso 3 folks for that option so far15:13
yoctozeptoand other tc-members? ;-)15:14
spotzI'm leaning pre-PTG so if therre's anything we can help with during the PTG we know\15:14
yoctozeptoyeah, pre-PTG might be better than post15:14
diablo_rojoif its just one week out before the ptg I can do that15:14
diablo_rojomore than that and I am busier with preparing15:14
gmannexact time we need to decide based on PTL availability. I would not say we fix the time instead we can check the availability at time to ~PTG15:15
yoctozeptomakes sense, we could also have adjusted sessions15:16
gmannyeah15:16
gmannI see no objection on option2 and no one in favor of option1 so let's final option215:16
yoctozepto++15:16
spotz++15:16
ricolin+115:16
gmannI will work on the draft proposal but after fixing the channel things15:17
diablo_rojosounds good15:17
gmann#topic Xena cycle tracker status check15:17
*** openstack changes topic to "Xena cycle tracker status check (Meeting topic: tc)"15:17
gmannthis week is our Xena cycle tracker status check15:17
gmann#link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tc-xena-tracker15:17
gmannif anyone start working on any item please add your progress/link etc in etherpad15:18
gmannone update from me is I am keeping  contributor guide patches as -W as we have to update the IRC things there https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%2522project-ptl-and-contrib-docs%2522+status:open15:18
gmannany other update form anyone on their item15:19
gmannI see no goal idea in Y cycle etehrpad #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/y-series-goals15:19
gmannone is one me for RBAC which i did not get time in this week too :(15:20
yoctozeptodon't feel bad, I'm time-starved as well15:20
gmannricolin: diablo_rojo_phon any other update or lead in this?15:20
dansmithfinishing RBAC is going to be a multi-cycle process for glance, fwiw15:20
diablo_rojoSadly none from me15:20
spotzThis is the most I've been online this week15:20
dansmithwe have a bunch of refactoring we have to do before we can proceed past where we are15:20
gmanndansmith: with Xena + Y or more further ?15:21
diablo_rojoI havent had much time in the last couple weeks.15:21
dansmithgmann: potential finish in Y, but the rate things are going with reviews on my PoC, I'm skeptical15:21
gmanndansmith: I see.15:21
dansmithgmann: point being, I think RBAC is good, but it might need to be one of those recurring ones :)15:21
ricolinI do looking around in community goal etherpad to find potential goals, and do found something might be great15:22
ricolin#link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/community-goals15:22
ricolinlike 11. Test with TLS (formerly SSL) by Default15:22
ricolinor 23. Finish moving legacy python-*client CLIs to python-openstackclient15:22
ricolinor 27. add container-images15:22
gmanndansmith: yeah, shipping consistent RBAC even across all project is always issue from us15:22
dansmithricolin: we do 11 in a lot of places, no?15:22
yoctozeptodansmith: and not in a lot of places as well15:23
ricolindansmith, yes, but no fully15:23
gmannI think devstack is default to TLS right15:23
yoctozeptowe checked that recently in qa15:23
yoctozeptoand the default is being overridden15:23
yoctozeptoall over the place15:23
gmannah15:23
gmanni remember now15:23
ricolinexactly15:23
dansmithnot fully, granted15:23
yoctozeptowe added an experimental+periodic job to test notls15:23
yoctozeptobecause it's that popular15:24
yoctozeptovide https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/74180715:24
yoctozeptohttps://codesearch.opendev.org/?q=tls-proxy%3A%20false&i=nope&files=&excludeFiles=&repos=15:24
yoctozeptothis is a good goal15:24
dansmithso what15:24
dansmithis the goal, remove the ability to turn it off?15:25
yoctozeptothat's the final outcome15:25
yoctozeptoand it's sane15:25
gmannon OSC, yes we need that but ricolin did you check with Artem,  there is email in openstack-discuss about work plan15:25
ricolinit actually broken if consider to run most services with tls15:25
gmann#link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-May/022535.html15:26
dansmithricolin: is that service broken-ness or devstack lib/foo brokenness?15:26
yoctozeptoyeah, some probably don't configure things around CA right15:26
yoctozeptodansmith: I believe mostly devstack lib/foo15:26
ricolinheat try to enable it for testing and appears need to fix in some services before heat can support it15:26
dansmithright, okay15:26
ricolinservice broken-ness I think15:26
dansmithlib/foo brokenness is unforunate but fixing it is work without a lot of gain to the actual projects15:26
dansmithif it's service brokenness then I totally agree15:27
ricolingmann, not yet15:27
yoctozeptodansmith: yeah, but we can't say which is which15:27
dansmithobviously we may not be able to determine one without the other15:27
ricolinbut I will15:27
dansmithyep15:27
gmannuntil we have job running with TLS on project side15:27
gmannmay we can just identified first how many fail with devstack remove the ability of  disabling it as WIP patch.15:28
ricolinagree15:28
gmannand then we can see how much work needed and this needs to be a goal or not15:28
dansmithso I think that devstack's notls arrangement is also how we test standalone services right?15:28
dansmithI think that there's some linkage there, IIRC15:29
dansmithif so, that's going to be a problem for people (like glance) that insist on bucking the wsgi thing :)15:29
gmannhumm15:29
yoctozeptoI don't really remember tbh15:29
dansmithglance also has resolutely decided to reject OSC entirely, which is relevant for the other suggestion here15:30
ricolinI will set up patches  to check if there is value for diving that one15:30
yoctozeptoricolin ++15:30
gmannricolin: yeah and on ML to ask project to test15:30
dansmithI'm happy for the TC to choose both of these goals and hope we can change some hearts and minds with it, I'm just pointing it out :)15:30
gmann#action ricolin to start testing patch for TLS and send on ML.15:31
gmanndansmith: yeah OSC work seems disappear after we did resolution :)15:31
gmanninstead of triggering it more15:31
dansmithheh15:31
diablo_rojoNot necessarily15:31
dansmithwe've lost a lot of OSC people since as well15:32
gmannyeah15:32
diablo_rojoI had 8 students working on it over the last several months15:32
diablo_rojoManila and Cinder have made huge progress.15:32
gmanndiablo_rojo_phon: great, I remember manila intern.15:32
diablo_rojoAll the nova microversion work is almost done15:32
ricolinon OSC?15:33
dansmithorly, news to me, but cool15:33
diablo_rojoricolin, yep15:33
gmannI did not know about those. is there any etherpad, ML thread to track/know this.15:33
fungiit's easy to assume nothing is happening in a project you don't pay attention to ;)15:33
gmanni remember we agreed to make this as PoPup team and track things but it did not happen15:33
*** corvus has quit IRC15:33
*** masayukig has quit IRC15:33
diablo_rojoI mean, I kept etherpads with the students but thats not really what you're looking for.15:33
gouthamr+1 more manila Outreachy intern working on OpenStackSDK for the next three months :)15:33
gmanngreat15:33
diablo_rojogmann, the popup team didnt really actually get created15:33
gmannyeah15:34
ricolingmann, do you remember who was the one driving this potential goal?15:34
ricolinI mean OSC one15:34
gmannif we have that much progress in this cycle the i think it make sense to make this as goal in Y15:34
diablo_rojogouthamr, and I still have the OSU intern helping with nova and placement stuff in the SDK15:34
dansmithdiablo_rojo: when is it glance's turn?15:34
diablo_rojogmann, I think I might hold off for one more release15:34
*** corvus has joined #openstack-tc15:34
*** masayukig has joined #openstack-tc15:34
diablo_rojodansmith, glance is actually in a pretty good spot already15:35
gmannricolin: i remember belmoreira15:35
gmannricolin: and Artem  proposed it many time in past15:35
dansmithdiablo_rojo: mordred added some basic import support for something I needed before he left,15:35
dansmithbut I think there are some pretty big gaps, IIRC15:35
gmanndiablo_rojo: dansmith I think we can focus glance via intern then it will be big pre-work and go ahead for goal15:36
ricolingmann, that will be great indeed15:36
diablo_rojodansmith, I had talked to artem about things that needed to get done and I think he said there was some OSC work left for glance but the SDK is at parity?15:36
diablo_rojoI might be misremembering though15:36
dansmithI'm hiiiiighly skeptical :)15:37
dansmithalso, last I heard from glance people, there was some fundamental brokenness about image membership assignment things15:37
diablo_rojoWell come join the next sdk/osc meeting and ask ;)15:37
dansmithI'll have to dig that back up15:37
gmannok, let's get someone to propose it as goal and which cycle we can select it based on progress15:37
diablo_rojoI would save it for Z15:37
diablo_rojonot Y15:37
diablo_rojojust so we can use this next release to get more organized and do prep work15:38
gmannyeah, but we can propose it in Xena itself and select in Y or Z15:38
dansmithdiablo_rojo: yeah the version I have on my devstack machine has no import ability, just a --with-import on the image create, which isn't really much15:38
diablo_rojoFair15:38
diablo_rojodansmith, hmmm alright, will have to chat with artem then15:38
dansmithoh,15:39
dansmithand totally no multistore support15:39
dansmithglance is planning to remove non-multistore at some point, which will be a big problem if osc doesn't have that at all15:39
diablo_rojookay15:39
gmanndansmith: but is glance ok to move on osc now?  or its just resource issue?15:40
dansmithgmann: they have been -2 on it since forever, AFAIK15:40
dansmithpart of it is because it's not complete and that membership thing is wrong or something,15:40
dansmithand they have no interest in working on it15:40
fungithe glance team wants a dedicated cli/sdk they control directly15:40
gmannyeah, as diablo_rojo mentioned we have 8 inter working on osc we can get some bandwidth from them to work on glance too ?15:41
dansmithbut, if some intern hours are able to resolve that and TC sets a goal, maybe we can sway some minds15:41
gmannyeah,15:41
diablo_rojogmann, had not have. Currently I think between gouthamr and I we have 315:41
dansmithyep, I'd be glad to help direct some of that effort, but I can't promise the team will embrace osc afterwards15:41
gmanndiablo_rojo: ack,15:41
ricolindansmith, sounds like some update from glance team is required as action15:42
gmannlet's go with that plan only. keep intern in osc work and also in glance may be future inter and also compose goal in parallel15:42
*** corvus has quit IRC15:42
gmannintern15:42
diablo_rojookay15:42
gmannricolin: diablo_rojo thanks for updates and work on collecting Y goal.15:42
gmann#topic Migration plan for 'Freenode' to 'OFTC' (gmann)15:43
*** openstack changes topic to "Migration plan for 'Freenode' to 'OFTC' (gmann) (Meeting topic: tc)"15:43
gmannthis is just to tell TC who did not join yesterday emergency meeting.15:43
gmannplease read ML about plan15:43
* jungleboyj sneaks in late.15:43
gmannand i added resolution also to record it as official TC motion15:43
diablo_rojoI would have joined had I not been asleep when the announcement about the emergency meeting went out lol.15:44
fungii also went back and tried to address remaining/post-meeting questions on the etherpad as well15:44
gmanngreat15:44
fungithere was apparently some confusion over which channels existed, but hopefully my answers cleared that up15:44
gmannas this resolution we need to merge soon (before migration planned date), is there any way to get formal-vote topic before 7 days timeline ?15:45
gmannmnaser: ^^ if you know or we did something in past15:45
dansmithgmann: I'm ready to vote when you fix the latest set of comments15:45
gmannfungi: +115:45
fungithe tc could also just retroactively merge that resolution15:45
dansmithI say this is an emergency resolution :)15:45
gmanndansmith: yoctozepto sure, I will fix15:45
yoctozeptook15:46
gmannI do not find anything to merge resolution in emergency in charter or house rule.15:47
fungisomething to add to the charter to do list: define provisions for emergency resolutions15:47
gmannyeah, that we need to add seems15:47
dansmithit doesn't really matter, does it? I mean if we have to wait a week to merge a thing that is effectively already done, meh?15:47
jungleboyj:-)15:48
fungii think it would need to be in the charter since that defines how motions are handled15:48
fungihouse rules are more about non-motion changes15:48
fungidansmith: yeah, that's what i meant by retroactive15:48
dansmithack15:48
gmanndansmith: if TC agree on this I think we can merge after a week or so, but if TC chaneg their mind then it is difficult situation :)15:49
fungiofficially the charter says a resolution can't merge this quickly, but that doesn't mean that the activity it describes has to wait15:49
dansmithfungi: right, that's what I'm thinking15:49
dansmithgmann: just amend to say "and no take-backs"15:49
dansmithgmann: "finder's keeper's"15:49
yoctozeptolol15:49
gmannbecause of L132 in 3link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/openstack-irc15:50
fungibut for future-proofing, ways to identify an "emergency resolution" or "urgent motion" or whatever could be helpful15:50
dansmithagree15:50
gmannlet's wait for defined deadline only which is 7 days from yesterday and then update charter for future situation handling15:51
gmanneveryone, please review that and I will fix comment together by end of today.15:52
gmann#topic Open Reviews15:52
*** openstack changes topic to "Open Reviews (Meeting topic: tc)"15:52
gmann#link https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/governance+is:open15:52
gmannmost of them have min favorable vote I will merge the eligible one. seems script has some issue on counting the number of days15:55
gmannanything else for today ?15:55
gmannlet's close then thanks everyone for joining15:56
gmann#endmeeting15:56
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Technical Committee office hours: Tuesdays at 09:00 UTC, Wednesdays at 01:00 UTC, and Thursdays at 15:00 UTC | https://governance.openstack.org/tc/ | channel logs http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-tc/"15:56
openstackMeeting ended Thu May 27 15:56:31 2021 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)15:56
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tc/2021/tc.2021-05-27-15.00.html15:56
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tc/2021/tc.2021-05-27-15.00.txt15:56
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tc/2021/tc.2021-05-27-15.00.log.html15:56
jungleboyjThank you!15:56
spotzThanks gmann, everyone15:56
yoctozeptothanks gmann15:56
dansmithdiablo_rojo: I didn't mean to jump all over you on the glance thing, I just have a natural reaction to "glance is in good shape" regardless of the context :P15:57
diablo_rojodansmith, I totally understand16:03
diablo_rojono worries at all16:03
*** rpittau is now known as rpittau|afk16:12
*** timburke has joined #openstack-tc16:20
*** corvus has joined #openstack-tc16:29
*** bnemec has quit IRC16:36
*** timburke_ has joined #openstack-tc16:50
*** timburke has quit IRC16:52
*** ralonsoh has quit IRC17:01
*** andrewbonney has quit IRC17:29
mnasergmann: we can merge it before, its fine17:29
mnasergmann: we can fast track and https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/house-rules.html#rolling-back-fast-tracked-changes remains17:30
gmannmnaser: but that is for house rule things not for resolution right?17:30
mnasergmann: applies for formal-vote too17:31
fungisays "fast-tracked under one of those house rules"17:31
gmannyeah that is what i am reading17:32
gmannit does not talk about formal-vote motion17:32
gmannmnaser: we discussed to merge it after week or so and then add this fast track for formal-vote too in charter for future situation17:32
fungibut regardless, i don't think it needs to be approved for us to take action on the things it describes17:33
mnaserthere is text somewhere17:33
mnaserthat talks about the chair being allowed to merge before the normal time17:33
mnaseri cant find it17:33
gmannah i remember that from on of your review, let me search17:34
fungiif you find it, then getting it mentioned somewhere more discoverable would also be great17:34
fungii suppose you could also argue that since https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/charter.html#motions says "should" rather than "must" there's some leeway on the requirements there17:38
gmanncannot find. I think that was for project-updates ?17:41
gmannI find this one which remove the extra 3 days after sufficient vote https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/73536117:45
gmannbut not fast track for formal-vote17:47
*** bnemec has joined #openstack-tc18:02
*** iurygregory has quit IRC18:25
openstackgerritGhanshyam proposed openstack/governance master: Add resolution to move the IRC network from Freenode to OFTC  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/79326018:51
*** timburke_ has quit IRC19:03
*** timburke has joined #openstack-tc19:24
*** lourot has quit IRC19:31
*** lourot has joined #openstack-tc19:32
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-tc19:41
*** e0ne has quit IRC19:45
*** tdasilva_ has quit IRC20:33
*** tdasilva_ has joined #openstack-tc20:35
*** iurygregory has joined #openstack-tc20:49
*** vishalmanchanda has quit IRC20:54
*** diablo_rojo has quit IRC22:48
*** tosky has quit IRC23:12
gmanntc-members: updated ^^23:31

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.2 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!