Tuesday, 2019-12-17

gmanntc-members ^^ please vote on Ussuri 2nd goal selection-   https://review.opendev.org/69931300:00
gmanndiablo_rojo: import-goal - https://opendev.org/openstack/goal-tools/00:03
diablo_rojogmann, oh cool thanks! I would guess that the goal needs to exist in the selected dir before it can be run00:04
diablo_rojobut I haven't looked at the code00:04
gmanndiablo_rojo: yeah, it takes goal doc url to fetch the goal documentation etc.00:05
diablo_rojoGot it.00:06
smcginnisWe have the results of the V naming poll!00:17
smcginnishttp://paste.openstack.org/show/787649/00:17
smcginnisThe one issue was the duplicate entry for Vidette.00:17
smcginnisIt would appear from the results that it does not require any further work to resolve that.00:17
smcginnisFolks either ranked them the same as ttx had suggested, or they only voted for one or the other. But combined, it does not look like it would have made it high enough in the ranking to be a contender.00:18
smcginnisI'll leave that to the TC to finalize though.00:18
smcginnisNext step is to have the foundation vet the results.00:18
smcginnisOnly announcing here until we go through that process, then I can announce the final results to the mailing list.00:19
* smcginnis goes back to finishing up supper prep.00:19
clarkbvictoria is a great town00:21
clarkbhighly recommend visiting if you are in the vicinity00:21
clarkb(I think I prefer it to vancouver)00:21
diablo_rojovkmc will be thrilled00:29
fungii too quite liked my visit to victoria. highly recommend00:50
fungithen again, i have an affinity for sleepy seaside villages00:51
fungion islands00:52
diablo_rojofungi, seems right up your alley for sure00:56
fungii'm not into antique shopping, but apparently if you are, it's the place to go for that01:02
clarkbIf you like museums https://royalbcmuseum.bc.ca/ is amazing01:03
fungilots of english military officers decided that was the place to retire to after the great war01:03
clarkbhttp://www.unionpacificcoffee.ca/ and that place serves amazing breakfast. Not a coffee drinker but I hear that is good there too :)01:06
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-tc01:53
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC02:02
*** tetsuro has joined #openstack-tc02:06
*** bnemec has quit IRC02:10
*** bnemec has joined #openstack-tc02:12
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-tc02:38
zanebdiablo_rojo: I have +2 on that repo <laughs maniacally>02:42
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC02:54
*** ricolin has joined #openstack-tc03:03
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-tc03:54
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC04:26
jungleboyjsmcginnis:  Thanks for sharing the news.04:54
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-tc05:35
*** slaweq has quit IRC05:43
*** ricolin_ has joined #openstack-tc06:10
*** ricolin has quit IRC06:13
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-tc06:28
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC06:33
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-tc06:48
*** ricolin_ is now known as ricolin07:00
*** jcapitao has joined #openstack-tc07:25
*** lpetrut has quit IRC07:54
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-tc07:58
*** rpittau|afk is now known as rpittau08:05
*** tosky has joined #openstack-tc08:20
*** dklyle_ has joined #openstack-tc09:01
*** ildikov_ has joined #openstack-tc09:03
*** coreycb_ has joined #openstack-tc09:03
*** knikolla_ has joined #openstack-tc09:03
*** tosky_ has joined #openstack-tc09:04
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-tc09:06
*** cmurphy has joined #openstack-tc09:06
*** amotoki_ has joined #openstack-tc09:09
*** tosky has quit IRC09:10
*** tbarron has quit IRC09:10
*** david-lyle has quit IRC09:10
*** cmorpheus has quit IRC09:10
*** asettle has quit IRC09:10
*** amotoki has quit IRC09:10
*** coreycb has quit IRC09:10
*** knikolla has quit IRC09:10
*** ildikov has quit IRC09:10
*** knikolla_ is now known as knikolla09:12
*** coreycb_ is now known as coreycb09:12
*** ildikov_ is now known as ildikov09:12
ttxI think Vidette scored sufficiently low that it's not a problem.09:15
*** jeremy__bouncer has joined #openstack-tc09:17
ttxsmcginnis: it's actually a bigger procedural issue that the CIVS results are not public (some might say you altered the results). But as a supporter of the "smaller group decides" option, I don't really care09:18
*** tosky_ is now known as tosky09:19
ricolino/09:22
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-tc10:01
*** asettle has joined #openstack-tc10:08
*** jcapitao is now known as jcapitao|afk11:21
*** ianychoi has quit IRC11:38
*** ianychoi has joined #openstack-tc11:40
*** amotoki_ is now known as amotoki12:12
smcginnisttx: Here is the results link: https://civs.cs.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/results.pl?id=E_13ccd49b66cfd1b4&rkey=4e184724fa32eed612:33
*** jcapitao|afk is now known as jcapitao12:49
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-tc12:56
ttxsmcginnis: weird that we don;t have the Vancouver vs. Victoria data... may be because you chose minimax (OpenSTack traditionally uses Schulze)13:01
ttxOh, it's actually a tie13:01
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC13:02
ttxMinimax ranks Victoria on top based on its performance against other options.13:03
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-tc13:08
fungii wasn't paying attention to the poll this time around, was a tie-breaker chosen at the start of the poll?13:10
openstackgerritThierry Carrez proposed openstack/governance-website master: Use openstackdocstheme 1.31.2  https://review.opendev.org/69941013:22
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC13:31
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-tc13:42
*** mriedem has joined #openstack-tc13:57
smcginnisttx: The results page lets you pick how you want to view the results.14:13
smcginnisfungi: (What) have we done a tie breaker before?14:13
asettleOh bummer.14:13
smcginnisResults in Shulze. For the lulz. https://civs.cs.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/results.pl?num_winners=1&id=E_13ccd49b66cfd1b4&rkey=4e184724fa32eed6&algorithm=beatpath14:13
smcginnisasettle: Not the results you wanted?14:14
asettlesmcginnis, just the tie breaker thing. We appear to be getting those a lot lately.14:14
jungleboyjOh, I wondered why the results looked like that when I looked last night.  So they tied.14:15
smcginnisI figured the TC would get to decide how to choose the winner out of those. Assuming the vetting process didn't eliminate one for whatever reason.14:15
smcginnisDon't think OpenStack can be confused with a motorcycle, but hey, lawyers get a little crazy at times.14:16
jungleboyjUgh, going to really put our new process to the test here.14:16
fungismcginnis: probably not the same situation, but for technical elections we proscribe a finishing method and tie breaking mechanism here: https://governance.openstack.org/election/#election-system14:39
fungier, prescribe i mean14:40
smcginnisSo it's a coin toss?14:40
ttxThat said, Minimax did pick the "best" as while they are tied, Victoria wins against other options by a larger margin14:40
smcginnisThat's what I was thinking.14:41
fungiyep, this way should a tie in the results arise, the officials can't be accused of selecting a finishing method and tie breaker afterward which allows them to influence the results14:41
ttxMinimax is not good at breaking loops, but it's good at breaking ties14:41
fungiin the case of this poll, minmax seems fine, agreed14:41
smcginnisFull disclosure that I'm biased, but I think that's one advantage of the CIVS poll that even though they are "tied", there is one that is indicated to be above the other.14:41
smcginnisBiased as far as my preferance for the naming. :)14:42
fungiheh14:42
fungiwell, regardless, if one is stricken from possibility by trademark concerns, then the other is still a find candidate (hopefully)14:42
ttxIn the spirit of transition toward the next system, we could just ask the TC to break the tie14:42
smcginnisYes, very happy with all of the top choices.14:43
smcginnisttx: ++14:43
ttxI was a strong Vancouver person, but I must say Victoria is a very good option too14:43
smcginnisDid I follow the new process right that the community will propose names like we have done in the past, then the TC will vote amongst itself which one to choose?14:43
ttxpropose names with no constraint,. But yes14:44
smcginnisOh, so no geographic or other targeted name? Just whatever name starts with the right letter?14:44
mugsieyup, and uses ASCII, and is less than 10 chars14:45
ttxyes14:45
smcginnisAh, good. That should greatly simplify things.14:45
ttxI expect a surge in "cultural" references like Train14:45
mugsiethat was the idea :)14:45
smcginnisProbably true.14:45
ttxanyway, whatever you prefer smcginnis. Say minimax chose the right solution, use coin toss, let the TC choose14:46
smcginnisI was hoping we could finish out this first A-Z with the same pattern of geo names, just to make it clear in the future which was part of what cycle, but at least we got pretty darn close.14:46
ttxI'm fine with *14:46
jungleboyjsmcginnis:  That would have been nice.14:46
smcginnisI would prefer if the TC chose the winner. But maybe taking into account that the CIVS poll results show higher support for Victoria even though there is a tie. :)14:47
ttxhaha14:47
fungii'd totally buy that line of reasoning14:48
ttxok... do you want to use CIVS for the TC poll ? Or just the vote meetbot14:48
ttxor just collect public statements14:48
ttxLet me know so that I can coordinate with others to produce another tie14:48
smcginnisSince there are only two choices and a small group of voters, I think the meetbot voting should probably work well.14:49
ttxthe main issue with meetbot is that we all need to vote around the same time. i would be fine with you collecting the votes in privmsg14:49
smcginnisWe can do it that way for sure if that would make it easier for the TC.14:51
smcginnisEspecially this time of year, it probably is difficult to get everyone together at the same time.14:52
funginot coming up with a good thing to propose in gerrit to achieve a similar effect asynchronously with review votes14:52
smcginnisI suppose I could put up two patches somewhere, one for each name, then let the TC vote on those.14:53
smcginnisBut probably simpler to have each person DM me?14:53
fungithough if you want to do async in irc, you could just ask tc members to highlight you and state their preference in here, which gets you a public log of their votes (at the risk of it maybe being slightly harder to make sure you don't overlook one i suppose)14:53
smcginnisOr do we want to have it open so it's recorded int he channel logs?14:53
smcginnisfungi: ++14:53
smcginnisI like that idea.14:53
mnaserand a deadline, i suppose14:55
fungialso if you're going for a simple majority, you could call it once that's reached assuming the split isn't too close14:55
fungiif 7 tc members weigh in favoring the same option, you don't need the remaining votes14:55
mnaseralso true14:56
smcginnisOK, let's go with that plan unless someone raises any major concerns about it.14:57
fungiwhich means some tc members may just cast a vote in favor of not dragging the process out ;)14:57
fungii'd be hard-pressed to choose between vancouver and victoria if i were on the tc14:58
fungithey're both great options14:58
smcginnisasettle, gmann, mugsie, jungleboyj, evrardjp, jroll, cloudnull, diablo_rojo, mnaser, njohnston, ricolin, ttx, zaneb: Please message me in this channel (smcginnis: I vote XX) with your vote to break the V naming tie.14:58
smcginnisWe will run the vote until we reach one with a majority.14:59
asettlesmcginnis, I vote Victoria14:59
njohnstonsmcginnis: I vote Victoria14:59
asettleJINX14:59
ttxsmcginnis: I wait until everyoen votes to feel more important14:59
smcginnisOr... next Monday? if we don't get enough votes?14:59
jungleboyjI vote Vancouver14:59
ttxwoo, game is ON14:59
smcginnisttx: Hey, no waiting so it looks like you pick a winner. :P14:59
* njohnston mentally rebrands Barbican as "Victoria's Secret"15:00
ttxTIL there was a Victoria McCloud15:00
* smcginnis shakes head15:00
cloudnullsmcginnis: I vote Victoria15:02
* jungleboyj can only hear the McCloud and Ewe joke in my head now. Thanks TTX.15:05
ttxI'm happy with both, so would tie them if it was a CIVS poll. But it's not, and so I'll choose Victoria because it fared better against other options than vancouver did15:08
ttxsmcginnis: I vote Victoria15:08
jungleboyjttx:  Awww, thanks.  Make me the outlier.  Though, after reading through the rest of the backlog that seems the best choice.15:08
ttx(keeping in mind Victoria could be striked out by trademark review and Vancouver picked instead :)15:08
smcginnisAre you feeling lonely now jungleboyj? :)15:10
smcginnisDon't worry, there's still time.15:10
jungleboyjI like Victoria too.15:10
jungleboyjSo, am happy either way.15:10
mugsiesmcginnis: I vote Victoria15:13
zanebI was really hoping for Victory, because giving the release the same name as someone in the community seems problematic. but vkmc seemed more enthusiastic about it than I would have been so...15:15
zanebsmcginnis: I vote Victoria15:15
zanebon the basis that it beat the other options by a wider margin15:15
smcginnisWe did have Rocky. :)15:16
smcginnisBoth being in past tense.15:17
zanebheh, true15:17
evrardjphey15:18
evrardjpare there 7 votes or 6?15:18
evrardjpI would prefer let my other fellow members chose, and be used for tie breaking if necessary.15:18
zanebcurrently 6:jungleboyj in favour of Victoria by my count15:20
smcginnisYep, that's what I have.15:20
evrardjpthat's what I have seen in logs too15:20
evrardjpsmcginnis: I vote Victoria15:25
evrardjpsmcginnis: this way we can continue with our lifes, because we have 7 votes.15:25
evrardjpThanks everyone for voting!15:26
smcginnisYep, that makes 7.15:26
smcginnisI can wait a little to see if anyone has any other feedback or wants to change their vote.15:26
*** jaosorior has joined #openstack-tc15:26
smcginnisBut that puts Victoria in the majority.15:26
evrardjpI guess, until official confirmation, welcome to OpenStack Victoria15:26
evrardjp(unofficial)15:26
smcginnis;)15:26
evrardjpWait is that release U or V?15:26
evrardjp:p15:26
evrardjp"Unofficial"15:27
smcginnisttx, fungi: Anything I need to do to get the Foundation process going?15:27
jungleboyjI am happy to vote Victoria after reading the backlog to make things easy.  I think it too is a good name.15:27
evrardjpzaneb: Victory!15:28
jungleboyjevrardjp:  Not an option.  ;-)15:28
evrardjpWe couldn't say Victory wins, that would have been a pleonasm15:29
zanebpeer pressure ftw ;)15:29
evrardjpjungleboyj: indeed15:29
evrardjpzaneb: hahaha15:29
njohnstonevrardjp: +100 style points for "pleonasm" :-)15:30
evrardjpI didn't know the english term, so I google translated it from french15:30
evrardjpwhat's the "usual" word for pleonasm?15:30
* zaneb goes to read up on the difference between pleonasm and tautology15:30
smcginnisHah15:30
cmurphyi had to google whether that was a real word15:31
evrardjphahaha15:31
smcginnisHaha, me too.15:31
smcginnis"Too much" maybe?15:31
evrardjpnah tautology is different15:31
cmurphythe one time evrardjp knows an english word that i don't15:31
smcginnishttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pleonasm15:31
njohnstonI think there has to be a repetitive aspect for it to be a tautology15:31
zanebevrardjp: I'd say tautology, in the sense of that actually being a work I'd heard of, but I don't know that that's used commonly (other than by language geeks) either15:31
evrardjpcmurphy: that's from greek , I have an excuse15:32
cmurphy:)15:32
zanebevrardjp: what's the french term?15:32
evrardjppléonasme :)15:32
njohnstonand pleonasm is more cogent than logorrhea15:32
evrardjpthough it's not often used in a conversation :)15:32
zanebpro tip, do NOT click on the link where it says "Not to be confused with Neoplasm." on wikipedia15:33
evrardjpHAHA15:33
evrardjpzaneb: I see you're back to the previous office hours topics15:33
zaneb"Tautology and pleonasm are not consistently differentiated in the literature"15:34
evrardjp(geriatrics office hours)15:34
zaneblol15:34
zanebyou clicked on the link didn't you15:34
evrardjpI thought tautology was applicable to more fields than litterature15:34
evrardjpzaneb: sadly I knew the term, but I clicked inded.15:35
* jungleboyj wishes I hadn't15:35
evrardjpthe image is totally worth it jungleboyj! :p15:35
jungleboyj:-)15:36
zanebwell, this has been... educational15:38
evrardjpnjohnston: I didn't know that term15:39
zanebmy take is that a pleonasm is a tautology that operates at the word (or sub-word) level15:39
evrardjpa pleonasm is a tautology indeed by definition, but the other ways isn't true. Which makes this sentence a tautology, if I am not mistaken15:40
evrardjpas zaneb said, indeed educational!15:40
evrardjpgenerally "palabre" is used instead of "logorrhée" in french15:41
evrardjpthough sensu stricto it's probably different :p15:42
evrardjpbut I like this new word :), thanks njohnston :D15:43
*** jeremyfreudberg has quit IRC15:46
njohnstonevrardjp: Thanks!  Yes, palaver (English equivalent of palabre) is idle chit chat whereas logorrhea is more of a high-speed poorly structured monologue at best, and close to Tourettes at it's worst.15:46
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC15:47
evrardjpyes indeed. Generally both involve a flow of words, which is why I guess we don't make such a difference (wrongly) where I live15:48
*** jeremyfreudberg has joined #openstack-tc15:48
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-tc15:48
evrardjpTIL!15:48
evrardjpthanks!15:48
evrardjp(now going back to vacation)15:48
smcginnisevrardjp: Enjoy!15:48
jungleboyjAh, I here palaver used in British radio.  Now I get it.15:49
*** jeremyfreudberg has quit IRC15:51
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC15:53
*** jeremyfreudberg has joined #openstack-tc15:55
*** jcapitao is now known as jcapitao|afk15:56
fungineat, i use tautology all the time in the "necessarily true assertion" sense, but was unaware it could also be used more generally to describe a redundancy of words (which was only a pleonasm as far as i was aware)15:57
fungii guess i only really knew tautology from logic courses at university (i took logic in both the math and philosophy departments, because i wanted to compare them)15:58
*** jeremyfreudberg has quit IRC15:58
*** jeremyfreudberg has joined #openstack-tc15:58
fungismcginnis: i can ask wes to get the ball rolling on verifying victoria15:58
fungii'll be on a call with him monentarily anyway15:59
fungimomentarily15:59
fungicertainly not monetarily15:59
smcginnisthanks!15:59
*** jeremyfreudberg has quit IRC15:59
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-tc15:59
*** jeremyfreudberg has joined #openstack-tc16:00
ricolinsmcginnis: I vote Victoria16:00
smcginnisThanks ricolin! We definitely have a majority now.16:01
ricolingoddess of victory sounds great to me:)16:01
smcginnis;)16:01
njohnstonHail to the Queen16:07
smcginnisIt was a rocky start.16:07
smcginnisMade me want to have a stein.16:07
smcginnisBut I got the train going.16:07
smcginnisAnd I'm done. :)16:07
* njohnston golf-claps16:08
smcginnisThanks, I'll be here all week. Don't forget to tip the Foundation staff on the way out.16:08
toskysmcginnis: u(s)suri about it?16:09
tosky(that was bad)16:09
smcginnisLove it!16:09
fungiit's a tough one to work into an english-language pun, bonus for effort16:11
*** e0ne has quit IRC16:20
*** jcapitao|afk is now known as jcapitao16:23
*** ricolin has quit IRC16:44
*** lpetrut has quit IRC16:44
fungismcginnis: i have cc'd your gmx.com address on a message to wes and jonathan about the naming poll results and requesting they initiate the trademark search16:46
fungiplease feel free to follow up if you need to correct any misstatements on my part16:47
smcginnisThanks fungi16:47
fungiany time!16:47
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC16:48
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-tc16:48
*** jeremy__bouncer has quit IRC16:49
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC16:53
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-tc16:53
*** jcapitao is now known as jcapitao|afk16:54
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC16:56
*** rpittau is now known as rpittau|afk17:25
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-tc17:31
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC17:33
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-tc17:34
gmanno/17:42
gmannevrardjp: if you are up to approve this? or i will do - https://review.opendev.org/#/c/691737/617:48
gmanntc-members: reminder to vote on moving the contributor guide goal to selected dir - https://review.opendev.org/#/c/699313/117:49
*** jaosorior has quit IRC18:04
gmannthanks smcginnis for working on naming thing. (^^)//18:20
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC18:51
*** jaosorior has joined #openstack-tc19:00
smcginnisnp19:05
* jungleboyj is so happy he read the scrollback. Rare to see smcginnis being punny.19:06
gmanndiablo_rojo: as per comment about PTL section in template, how you would like to proceed ? - https://review.opendev.org/#/c/696001/19:25
smcginnisjungleboyj: :D19:25
gmanndiablo_rojo: if we decide to have or drop the PTL guide/section ,it need goal definition change before we move that to selected dir.19:26
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-tc19:27
gmannmy idea is 1. merge the current goal proposed patch 2. discuss/fix and merge the template 3. if needed change the goal definition in new patch 4. move it to selected dir.19:28
gmanntc-members ^^ thoughts19:28
diablo_rojogmann, I still believe that the section belongs here19:31
diablo_rojothat being a PTL is a form of contribution19:32
gmannok. we can discuss about that and if no change then we can skip 3rd step. let's merge current goal proposal patch and then work on template. what you say ?19:33
diablo_rojoThat sounds good to me19:35
diablo_rojoGet the goal merged19:35
gmannok19:35
diablo_rojoGet the goal switched to the correct dir19:35
gmanntc-members: (evrardjp ) I will approve 691737 after 2 hours (it already satisfy approval requirement), please raise hand if any objection - https://review.opendev.org/#/c/691737/19:35
diablo_rojoand I will get the template updated today19:35
gmann+1. thanks19:35
jungleboyjgmann:  I am fine with your plan.19:36
jungleboyjWork the issues through the template review and update the goal if needed.19:36
gmannyeah19:37
jungleboyjI didn't realize there was renewed debate there.19:38
njohnstonI am fine with merging now and then iterating on it19:41
*** ianw is now known as ianw_pto19:50
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-tc19:55
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC20:11
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-tc20:12
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC20:19
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-tc20:34
openstackgerritJeremy Stanley proposed openstack/governance master: Update vulnerability:managed policy  https://review.opendev.org/67842620:37
*** jaosorior has quit IRC20:45
*** jaosorior has joined #openstack-tc21:09
*** jaosorior has quit IRC21:15
*** jcapitao|afk has quit IRC21:18
*** e0ne has quit IRC21:25
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC21:28
*** diablo_rojo has quit IRC21:58
*** diablo_rojo has joined #openstack-tc22:35
*** slaweq has quit IRC22:37
openstackgerritMerged openstack/governance master: Add goal for project specific PTL and contributor guides  https://review.opendev.org/69173722:40
*** dklyle_ is now known as dklyle23:12
*** tbarron_ has joined #openstack-tc23:58

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!