*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-tc | 00:45 | |
*** lbragstad has quit IRC | 00:57 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-tc | 00:58 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 01:07 | |
*** ricolin has joined #openstack-tc | 01:07 | |
*** sapd1 has joined #openstack-tc | 01:35 | |
*** ijolliffe has quit IRC | 02:07 | |
*** gouthamr has quit IRC | 02:10 | |
*** gouthamr has joined #openstack-tc | 02:12 | |
*** diablo_rojo has joined #openstack-tc | 02:24 | |
*** diablo_rojo has quit IRC | 02:47 | |
*** whoami-rajat has joined #openstack-tc | 02:58 | |
*** whoami-rajat has quit IRC | 05:07 | |
*** jaypipes has quit IRC | 05:09 | |
*** jaypipes has joined #openstack-tc | 05:09 | |
*** tdasilva has quit IRC | 06:15 | |
*** whoami-rajat has joined #openstack-tc | 06:31 | |
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-tc | 07:17 | |
*** e0ne has quit IRC | 07:19 | |
*** tosky has joined #openstack-tc | 08:04 | |
*** jpich has joined #openstack-tc | 08:49 | |
asettle | Morning o/ | 09:00 |
---|---|---|
*** ricolin has quit IRC | 09:27 | |
openstackgerrit | Jens Harbott (frickler) proposed openstack/governance master: Rename Chef OpenStack project and update it https://review.openstack.org/648356 | 09:40 |
frickler | tc-members: ^^ not sure whether this is the correct way to propose it or whether there should be some discussion first, feedback welcome | 09:42 |
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-tc | 09:47 | |
evrardjp | thanks frickler | 09:56 |
*** dtantsur|afk is now known as dtantsur | 09:59 | |
*** melwitt has quit IRC | 10:26 | |
*** e0ne has quit IRC | 10:31 | |
*** melwitt has joined #openstack-tc | 10:32 | |
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-tc | 10:36 | |
*** e0ne has quit IRC | 10:58 | |
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-tc | 11:05 | |
*** weshay_pto is now known as weshay | 11:59 | |
*** whoami-rajat has quit IRC | 12:10 | |
*** whoami-rajat has joined #openstack-tc | 12:21 | |
*** ijolliffe has joined #openstack-tc | 12:22 | |
*** ijolliffe has quit IRC | 12:26 | |
*** ijolliffe has joined #openstack-tc | 12:27 | |
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-tc | 12:30 | |
dhellmann | frickler : thanks, that doesn't look controversial to me but a mailing list post with a bit more background would be good | 12:33 |
dhellmann | maybe it's just a matter of wanting consistency? | 12:33 |
*** e0ne has quit IRC | 12:41 | |
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-tc | 12:43 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-tc | 12:45 | |
*** lbragstad has quit IRC | 12:49 | |
*** ijolliffe has quit IRC | 12:58 | |
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-tc | 13:02 | |
*** Luzi has joined #openstack-tc | 13:03 | |
*** ijolliffe has joined #openstack-tc | 13:03 | |
*** lbragstad has quit IRC | 13:07 | |
evrardjp | mnaser: I think we should do the same for openstack-ansible if it's not too hard. | 13:16 |
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-tc | 13:17 | |
mnaser | dhellmann: from a release mgmt perspective, is it probably advisable to land this change after we release for now? | 13:18 |
mnaser | evrardjp: yeah, I think jimmy tried to push a change at some point and there was an issue around it | 13:18 |
evrardjp | I seem to remember that | 13:19 |
evrardjp | still, I think it would be nice to be consistent everywhere | 13:19 |
*** e0ne has quit IRC | 13:20 | |
dhellmann | mnaser : that's a question for smcginnis. I think either way it's going to mean updating a bunch of files in the releases repo | 13:25 |
openstackgerrit | Lance Bragstad proposed openstack/governance master: Elaborate on the business value of documentation owners https://review.openstack.org/641750 | 13:29 |
evrardjp | if we change the releases management for OSA again mnaser that wouldn't be too bad. In fact it would help at OSA releasing :p | 13:34 |
evrardjp | but that's a longer story. | 13:34 |
smcginnis | mnaser: I agree, given where we are in the cycle, it would b ebest to do that change after the stein release date so we don't have a fire drill. | 13:35 |
*** ijolliffe has quit IRC | 13:36 | |
mnaser | evrardjp: yeah... anything to make life easy | 13:37 |
evrardjp | smcginnis: I totally agree :) | 13:37 |
mnaser | smcginnis: great, mind just leaving that as a review comment when you have a few (non existent) seconds ? :P | 13:38 |
evrardjp | there is no urgency on osa side | 13:38 |
smcginnis | mnaser: Will do! | 13:38 |
evrardjp | (I guess same applies for chef) | 13:38 |
*** ijolliffe has joined #openstack-tc | 13:51 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 13:52 | |
openstackgerrit | Lance Bragstad proposed openstack/governance master: Describe the business value of consistent RBAC https://review.openstack.org/645361 | 13:55 |
openstackgerrit | Lance Bragstad proposed openstack/governance master: Elaborate on the business value of Designate https://review.openstack.org/641790 | 14:03 |
lbragstad | i appreciate all the reviews jroll | 14:06 |
jroll | lbragstad: no problem :) | 14:07 |
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-tc | 14:27 | |
*** whoami-rajat has quit IRC | 14:30 | |
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-tc | 14:38 | |
*** ricolin has joined #openstack-tc | 14:59 | |
fungi | i guess it's office hour now | 15:00 |
jroll | tis | 15:00 |
ricolin | yep | 15:01 |
smcginnis | Maybe a quieter week after all the highly active ones. | 15:01 |
fungi | thuogh i'm also in the security sig weekly meeting so may not be paying super close attention in here | 15:01 |
lbragstad | o/ | 15:02 |
dhellmann | o/ | 15:04 |
zaneb | o/ | 15:05 |
openstackgerrit | Jens Harbott (frickler) proposed openstack/governance master: Rename Chef OpenStack project and update it https://review.openstack.org/648356 | 15:05 |
*** tdasilva has joined #openstack-tc | 15:06 | |
gmann | o/ | 15:07 |
mnaser | something I've shopped around is the idea of an ipv6 mgmt plane support for devstack plugins | 15:10 |
mnaser | so that we can run devstack in IPv6 only mode (therefore means all services can run with IPv6) | 15:10 |
mnaser | any thoughts about it? | 15:10 |
fungi | making sure our inter-service communications can work over ipv6 would be great, in my opinion | 15:12 |
jroll | my TC brain is 100% for that | 15:12 |
jroll | my ironic brain says ensuring that all the variations of pxe booting and NIC firmware we support can do v6 seems scary :) | 15:13 |
*** e0ne has quit IRC | 15:14 | |
jroll | I guess we don't need all of it working, just the more common ones | 15:14 |
smcginnis | Control plane might be OK. But last I knew, there were still some devices that don't fully support IPv6 in all scenarios. I know we had some cinder storage vendors that did not support it for iSCSI, just management API. | 15:15 |
dtroyer | I think the important bit is that it isn't our software that is the limiting factor | 15:15 |
smcginnis | ++ | 15:16 |
evrardjp | ++ | 15:16 |
jroll | given that all services ostensibly support wsgi, thus support standard web servers like httpd and nginx, control plane should just be done other than CI, right? | 15:16 |
jroll | dtroyer: ++ | 15:16 |
jroll | (big fat "should" there, as usual) | 15:16 |
ricolin | ++ | 15:17 |
dtroyer | right, nice assumptions about how long a string representation of an IP address is, or that a colon in a URL is only after the scheme or before a port number, yadda yadda yadda | 15:17 |
* dtroyer has never made either of those mistakes, nope, never… | 15:18 | |
jroll | ooo, fair. | 15:18 |
evrardjp | dtroyer: :) | 15:20 |
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-tc | 15:20 | |
*** Luzi has quit IRC | 15:25 | |
mnaser | yeah, so I think it's a fairly achievable goal | 15:28 |
mnaser | and it's usually just filtered around fixing assumptions around ip scheme | 15:28 |
mnaser | I agree with jroll and smcginnis that some projects will _inevitebly_ interact with ipv4 only services, but at least, openstack itself should be able to run ipv6 in terms of listeners, etc, etc | 15:29 |
fungi | yeah, it would be great if our software were capable of operating without ipv4, and offered v4 support as a legacy fallback for interacting with devices/environments which lack proper v6 support | 15:31 |
gmann | ++, as software side if we make sure of working it with ipv6, it is much benefits for operator perspective. | 15:32 |
fungi | so i think having working v6-only integration test jobs is a laudable goal to prove that's possible | 15:36 |
mnaser | fungi: yeah, im thinking maybe someone can help build a job that disables ipv4 and runs IPv6 only for example | 15:36 |
fungi | obviously we do still need to test that we can interoperate with v4-only suystems too | 15:36 |
mnaser | we are moving all our infra to v6 | 15:36 |
mnaser | and we have ran into some challenges, so I thought it would make sense | 15:36 |
fungi | it's an excellent suggestion indeed | 15:37 |
mnaser | would anyone like to volunteer to draft up the document and we can try and find a champion if we think it's good? | 15:37 |
gmann | fungi: +1, we have support of that in devstack with base jobs ready seems (running as n-v on tempest). every project having a voting ipv6 only job | 15:37 |
mnaser | yeah, if we aim for a voting ipv6 only job as a way to know if its complete, that seems pretty good way to not regress | 15:38 |
mnaser | anyways, by doing this, we'll probably make our code more robust too because i.e. if someone was parsing code in a questionable way that made assumption on an ip, now they can use $some_python_lib to do that (hopefully we don't have people implementing ipv6 parsing libs :P) | 15:39 |
*** e0ne has quit IRC | 15:40 | |
jroll | mnaser: too late :P https://github.com/openstack/oslo.utils/blob/master/oslo_utils/netutils.py#L37 | 15:40 |
jroll | at least it's in oslo and not a bunch of projects, though :) | 15:40 |
mnaser | jroll: that's a good thing to actually list in that document | 15:41 |
mnaser | yeah, Oslo.utils is pretty accessible | 15:41 |
jroll | mnaser: yeah, the whole file has some helpful stuff for this goal | 15:41 |
mnaser | yeah ipv6 platform detection and all | 15:42 |
* mnaser looks at history of that file and suggests them all as potential goal champions | 15:42 | |
mnaser | :P | 15:42 |
fungi | works for me! | 15:49 |
mnaser | I guess we don't have anyone volunteer to push this up as a potential goal | 15:51 |
mnaser | I have a lot going on right now (cloud upgrades, openstack-ansible release) so I couldn't do it right _now_ but I could do it after release, but that might be a bit late for PTLs | 15:52 |
mnaser | I think it would be neat if someone could help out at least draft that stuff out | 15:52 |
jroll | I would if I had time, but I don't, sorry | 15:52 |
jroll | mnaser: by "too late for PTLs", do you mean you wanted to have something before the PTG to talk about for train? or U? | 15:56 |
*** diablo_rojo has joined #openstack-tc | 16:02 | |
mnaser | jroll: train, correct, similar to the concerns lbragstad had at the time | 16:16 |
fungi | zigo also mentioned a potentially interesting goal on openstack-discuss just a few minutes ago | 16:21 |
fungi | http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2019-March/004329.html | 16:22 |
TheJulia | my tc brain says that if we want v6 to be a priority for teams, we're going to need to partner with the deployment tools to force it forward | 16:27 |
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-tc | 16:27 | |
TheJulia | And more so from a standpoint of not doing or avoiding doing things that are v6 only and driving things in projects that are v6 only | 16:27 |
mnaser | TheJulia: yeah, this is one of the rare goals that deployment tools can actually participate in too! | 16:29 |
TheJulia | My ironic brain, like jroll's cries as well, considering we'll likely ahve to hold on to some custom roms to do bare metal | 16:29 |
mnaser | we usually were left out of the fun =P | 16:29 |
fungi | i suspect pushing it on deployment tools before we even test that it works under devstack may be putting the cart before the horse | 16:30 |
evrardjp | fungi: that's indeed an interesting goal, it simplifies the user interface | 16:31 |
TheJulia | the cloud vendors are another issue | 16:32 |
*** whoami-rajat has joined #openstack-tc | 16:32 | |
*** smcginnis is now known as smcginnis_pto | 16:48 | |
*** e0ne has quit IRC | 17:07 | |
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-tc | 17:08 | |
*** e0ne has quit IRC | 17:17 | |
*** jamesmcarthur_ has joined #openstack-tc | 17:17 | |
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-tc | 17:21 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 17:21 | |
*** ricolin has quit IRC | 17:26 | |
*** jpich has quit IRC | 17:30 | |
*** ricolin has joined #openstack-tc | 17:38 | |
*** e0ne has quit IRC | 17:45 | |
*** ricolin has quit IRC | 17:46 | |
*** Sundar has joined #openstack-tc | 17:58 | |
*** dtantsur is now known as dtantsur|afk | 18:08 | |
*** jamesmcarthur_ has quit IRC | 18:47 | |
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-tc | 19:33 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-tc | 19:51 | |
*** jaypipes_ has joined #openstack-tc | 19:54 | |
*** jaypipes has quit IRC | 19:54 | |
*** e0ne has quit IRC | 20:00 | |
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 21:07 | |
*** ijolliffe has quit IRC | 21:37 | |
*** whoami-rajat has quit IRC | 22:52 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 22:57 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-tc | 23:14 | |
*** Sundar has quit IRC | 23:15 | |
*** adriant has quit IRC | 23:34 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 23:42 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-tc | 23:43 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 23:48 | |
*** adriant has joined #openstack-tc | 23:49 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!