*** mikecmpbll has quit IRC | 00:37 | |
*** psachin has joined #openstack-swift | 03:03 | |
viks__ | notmyname: I enabled it now, but even though my admin is a reseller admin, i get `<html><h1>Unauthorized</h1><p>This server could not verify that you are authorized to access the document you requested.</p></html>` for account delete request. Is there any other settings i need to change? | 05:13 |
---|---|---|
viks__ | notmyname: It seems it's working and problem at my end.. | 06:15 |
viks__ | the above error is because i used single quote for -> 'X-Auth-Token: $TOKEN', changing it to double quotes resolved this error. | 06:52 |
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-swift | 06:53 | |
*** e0ne has quit IRC | 07:55 | |
*** gkadam has joined #openstack-swift | 08:40 | |
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-swift | 09:04 | |
*** e0ne has quit IRC | 09:05 | |
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-swift | 09:25 | |
openstackgerrit | Kazuhiro MIYAHARA proposed openstack/swift master: Enable to configure object-expirer in object-server.conf https://review.openstack.org/601950 | 09:52 |
*** mikecmpbll has joined #openstack-swift | 10:27 | |
openstackgerrit | Kazuhiro MIYAHARA proposed openstack/swift master: Enable to configure object-expirer in object-server.conf https://review.openstack.org/601950 | 10:41 |
*** mikecmpbll has quit IRC | 11:04 | |
DHE | viks__: shells when using single-quotes and $dollarsigns won't expand the variable. | 11:25 |
*** gkadam_ has joined #openstack-swift | 11:42 | |
*** gkadam has quit IRC | 11:44 | |
*** e0ne has quit IRC | 11:46 | |
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-swift | 11:47 | |
openstackgerrit | Kazuhiro MIYAHARA proposed openstack/swift master: Add object-expirer new mode to execute tasks from general task queue https://review.openstack.org/517389 | 11:47 |
*** gkadam_ has quit IRC | 11:48 | |
*** gkadam has joined #openstack-swift | 11:59 | |
*** csmart has left #openstack-swift | 12:04 | |
*** csmart has joined #openstack-swift | 12:04 | |
openstackgerrit | Kazuhiro MIYAHARA proposed openstack/swift master: Add object-expirer new mode to execute tasks from general task queue https://review.openstack.org/517389 | 12:06 |
viks__ | DHE: Thanks.. Now it works.. | 12:11 |
*** e0ne has quit IRC | 12:34 | |
*** gkadam_ has joined #openstack-swift | 12:43 | |
*** gkadam has quit IRC | 12:45 | |
*** psachin has quit IRC | 13:21 | |
*** viks__ has quit IRC | 14:15 | |
*** gkadam_ has quit IRC | 16:14 | |
*** jdewald42 has joined #openstack-swift | 16:51 | |
jdewald42 | Hi there, I recently discovered that one of our proxy and container server nodes has been upgraded to 2.19 whereas our other servers are running 2.7. We actually want everything to run 2.7 and wanted to confirm whether it is possible to downgrade that one server. It is not an acting in an object server capacity. | 16:56 |
jdewald42 | (ideally we want to upgrade everything, but that's for another day) | 16:56 |
DHE | I mean.. if in doubt, just rm -rf the container storage space while the service is offline, downgrade, and let replication deal with it | 16:57 |
jdewald42 | nice | 17:03 |
jdewald42 | Is it safe to attempt the downgrade with the containers as-is and remove them if it goes sideways? I wouldn't expect it to impact any other servers | 17:07 |
DHE | I don't know either way. My gut says it would be okay, but I have no standing either way to make such a claim. | 17:17 |
DHE | Letting replication deal with it just seems safest. Treat it like a hard drive failure | 17:18 |
jdewald42 | Seems reasonable, thanks! | 17:28 |
timburke | jdewald42: i have no reason to think that a downgrade would be problematic, provided you haven't tried to use any new features that 2.19 would enable (like container sharding) | 17:36 |
timburke | some of those container may have an extra table but it shouldn't impact the old code | 17:36 |
jdewald42 | Nice, correct we have not enabled sharding yet | 17:38 |
timburke | since replication works by rsync when there's a large diff, we have to be fairly careful that not only can new servers read old dbs, but also that new dbs can be used by old servers (or we have to shut down replication very early on, such as what we do if a container *does* have sharding enabled) | 17:38 |
timburke | so, if a downgrade *does* cause problems, (1) i'd be interested to hear, just for my own knowledge and (2) you'll probably be safest to nuke the db and let replication fix it | 17:40 |
jdewald42 | I see, so you're thinking an in-place downgrade *should* be safe | 17:42 |
timburke | pretty sure. but it's also something that we haven't tested much | 17:42 |
timburke | as a general rule, we like upgrades more ;-) | 17:42 |
jdewald42 | totally understandable | 17:43 |
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-swift | 17:45 | |
*** e0ne has quit IRC | 17:59 | |
openstackgerrit | Tim Burke proposed openstack/swift master: py3: Port the acl, account_quotas, cname_lookup, container_sync https://review.openstack.org/618077 | 18:56 |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/swift master: py3: Port the acl, account_quotas, cname_lookup, container_sync https://review.openstack.org/618077 | 20:03 |
*** jdewald42 has quit IRC | 20:05 | |
*** mikecmpbll has joined #openstack-swift | 22:14 | |
openstackgerrit | Tim Burke proposed openstack/swift master: Run ceph-s3-tests job less https://review.openstack.org/627572 | 22:36 |
timburke | 22:53 | |
openstackgerrit | Tim Burke proposed openstack/swift master: Address some review comments https://review.openstack.org/627574 | 23:02 |
openstackgerrit | Tim Burke proposed openstack/swift master: Move KMIP conf validation out of _get_root_secret https://review.openstack.org/589673 | 23:26 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!