*** chlong has quit IRC | 00:13 | |
*** jerrygb has quit IRC | 00:15 | |
*** asettle is now known as asettle-afk | 00:26 | |
*** chlong has joined #openstack-swift | 00:26 | |
*** ho has joined #openstack-swift | 00:38 | |
ho | good morning! | 00:39 |
---|---|---|
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift | 00:42 | |
*** badari has quit IRC | 00:42 | |
*** dmorita has quit IRC | 00:43 | |
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift | 00:45 | |
*** dmorita has quit IRC | 00:47 | |
mattoliverau | ho: morning | 00:49 |
ho | mattoliverau: morning! | 00:50 |
*** asettle-afk is now known as asettle | 00:51 | |
*** blmartin has joined #openstack-swift | 00:58 | |
*** chlong has quit IRC | 01:01 | |
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift | 01:06 | |
kota_ | ho, mattolivearu: morning | 01:07 |
*** dmorita has quit IRC | 01:17 | |
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-swift | 01:32 | |
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC | 01:37 | |
ho | kota_: morning! | 01:37 |
*** badari has joined #openstack-swift | 01:39 | |
openstackgerrit | Matthew Oliver proposed openstack/swift: Modify functional tests to use testr https://review.openstack.org/214206 | 01:51 |
openstackgerrit | Shu Muto proposed openstack/python-swiftclient: Delete python bytecode before every test run https://review.openstack.org/252210 | 01:59 |
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-swift | 02:03 | |
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC | 02:09 | |
mattoliverau | kota_: morning | 02:14 |
*** 7JTABCRUQ has joined #openstack-swift | 02:22 | |
*** asettle has quit IRC | 02:33 | |
*** asettle has joined #openstack-swift | 02:33 | |
*** chlong has joined #openstack-swift | 02:36 | |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/swift: Add functional test for repeated SLO segments https://review.openstack.org/251909 | 02:38 |
*** links has joined #openstack-swift | 02:45 | |
*** 7JTABCRUQ has quit IRC | 03:01 | |
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-swift | 03:01 | |
*** badari has quit IRC | 03:05 | |
*** sanchitmalhotra has joined #openstack-swift | 03:06 | |
openstackgerrit | Janie Richling proposed openstack/swift: WIP - Support for http footers - Replication and EC https://review.openstack.org/237393 | 03:14 |
openstackgerrit | pei ran wu proposed openstack/swift: Fix POST-as-COPY mess up the DLO manifest https://review.openstack.org/252791 | 03:18 |
*** barker has joined #openstack-swift | 03:29 | |
*** klrmn1 has quit IRC | 03:35 | |
*** blmartin has quit IRC | 03:37 | |
*** barker has quit IRC | 03:56 | |
*** ianbrown has joined #openstack-swift | 04:00 | |
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC | 04:01 | |
*** haomaiwa_ has joined #openstack-swift | 04:01 | |
*** ianbrown has quit IRC | 04:15 | |
*** ianbrown_ has joined #openstack-swift | 04:15 | |
*** trifon has joined #openstack-swift | 04:18 | |
*** eranrom has joined #openstack-swift | 04:18 | |
*** eranrom has quit IRC | 04:25 | |
*** ianbrown_ is now known as ianbrown | 04:28 | |
*** ianbrown has quit IRC | 04:42 | |
*** ianbrown has joined #openstack-swift | 04:42 | |
*** proteusguy_ has quit IRC | 04:43 | |
*** badari has joined #openstack-swift | 04:44 | |
*** wupeiran has joined #openstack-swift | 04:46 | |
*** ppai has joined #openstack-swift | 04:51 | |
*** trifon has quit IRC | 04:52 | |
*** proteusguy_ has joined #openstack-swift | 04:56 | |
*** haomaiwa_ has quit IRC | 05:01 | |
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-swift | 05:01 | |
*** chlong has quit IRC | 05:05 | |
*** chlong has joined #openstack-swift | 05:22 | |
*** ianbrown has quit IRC | 05:29 | |
*** ianbrown has joined #openstack-swift | 05:29 | |
*** silor has joined #openstack-swift | 05:37 | |
*** SkyRocknRoll has joined #openstack-swift | 05:49 | |
*** trifon has joined #openstack-swift | 05:55 | |
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC | 06:01 | |
*** haomaiwa_ has joined #openstack-swift | 06:01 | |
*** badari has quit IRC | 06:03 | |
*** ChubYann has quit IRC | 06:11 | |
*** alexandra_ has joined #openstack-swift | 06:17 | |
*** ianbrown has quit IRC | 06:26 | |
*** ianbrown has joined #openstack-swift | 06:26 | |
*** SkyRocknRoll has quit IRC | 06:29 | |
openstackgerrit | Kota Tsuyuzaki proposed openstack/swift: Support last modified on listing containers https://review.openstack.org/198634 | 06:30 |
*** ianbrown has quit IRC | 06:30 | |
*** ianbrown has joined #openstack-swift | 06:30 | |
*** eranrom has joined #openstack-swift | 06:30 | |
*** ianbrown has quit IRC | 06:31 | |
*** ianbrown has joined #openstack-swift | 06:32 | |
*** SkyRocknRoll has joined #openstack-swift | 06:41 | |
*** openstackgerrit_ has joined #openstack-swift | 06:51 | |
*** SkyRocknRoll has quit IRC | 06:58 | |
*** haomaiwa_ has quit IRC | 07:01 | |
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-swift | 07:01 | |
*** SkyRocknRoll has joined #openstack-swift | 07:14 | |
*** trifon has quit IRC | 07:24 | |
*** chlong has quit IRC | 07:29 | |
*** trifon has joined #openstack-swift | 07:40 | |
*** ntt has joined #openstack-swift | 07:42 | |
*** hferenc has joined #openstack-swift | 07:43 | |
ntt | Hi, I need to measure the space occupied by users for billing.... should I use ceilometer for this? | 07:43 |
hferenc | hi all | 07:44 |
hferenc | could someone be so kind to check this patch out https://review.openstack.org/#/c/235950/ ? | 07:45 |
hferenc | it already has a +2 and a +1 | 07:45 |
hferenc | it is also verified by mr. jenkins | 07:46 |
hferenc | however it needs a final review | 07:47 |
*** ianbrown_ has joined #openstack-swift | 07:55 | |
*** ianbrown has quit IRC | 07:58 | |
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC | 08:01 | |
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-swift | 08:01 | |
*** arnox has joined #openstack-swift | 08:02 | |
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC | 08:05 | |
*** haomaiwa_ has joined #openstack-swift | 08:05 | |
*** rledisez has joined #openstack-swift | 08:12 | |
*** shakamunyi has quit IRC | 08:14 | |
*** ianbrown_ has quit IRC | 08:19 | |
*** ianbrown_ has joined #openstack-swift | 08:23 | |
*** rledisez has quit IRC | 08:29 | |
*** rledisez has joined #openstack-swift | 08:30 | |
*** asettle has quit IRC | 08:47 | |
*** ianbrown_ has quit IRC | 08:51 | |
kota_ | ho: just looking at same patch | 08:51 |
kota_ | ho: patch 235950 | 08:52 |
patchbot | kota_: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/235950/ - Replace string slicing with proper string methods | 08:52 |
*** jordanP has joined #openstack-swift | 08:53 | |
*** ianbrown has joined #openstack-swift | 08:56 | |
ho | kota_: it's tough one for me. i sometimes prefer to use indexes for string but looks logically correct :P | 08:56 |
*** ho has quit IRC | 08:57 | |
*** haomaiwa_ has quit IRC | 09:01 | |
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-swift | 09:02 | |
hferenc | thx guys for your time in advance | 09:04 |
kota_ | hferenc: no worries | 09:05 |
kota_ | hferenc: how do you think about Clay's comments, he added +2 tho? | 09:05 |
hferenc | regarding the status message checking thing he is absolutely right | 09:08 |
hferenc | i am planning to fix that issues as well | 09:09 |
kota_ | ok, good | 09:10 |
kota_ | i'll add +2, +A expecting you are going to work for that :-) | 09:10 |
kota_ | thanks | 09:10 |
openstackgerrit | OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/swift: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/88736 | 09:15 |
hferenc | can i reference a review comment in a bug report somehow? | 09:20 |
kota_ | yup | 09:28 |
kota_ | ah, might be we can make just a link for gerrit address | 09:29 |
kota_ | in commit message. | 09:29 |
hferenc | https://bugs.launchpad.net/swift/+bug/1523401 | 09:30 |
openstack | Launchpad bug 1523401 in OpenStack Object Storage (swift) "FormPost should use WSGIContext" [Undecided,New] - Assigned to Ferenc Horváth (hferenc) | 09:30 |
*** sayali has joined #openstack-swift | 09:32 | |
*** jistr has joined #openstack-swift | 09:36 | |
*** ianbrown has quit IRC | 09:40 | |
*** ianbrown has joined #openstack-swift | 09:45 | |
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC | 10:01 | |
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-swift | 10:01 | |
*** arnox has quit IRC | 10:02 | |
*** arnox has joined #openstack-swift | 10:05 | |
*** silor has quit IRC | 10:11 | |
*** ianbrown has quit IRC | 10:13 | |
*** ianbrown has joined #openstack-swift | 10:13 | |
*** aix has joined #openstack-swift | 10:19 | |
*** openstackgerrit_ has quit IRC | 10:23 | |
*** jistr has quit IRC | 10:29 | |
*** jistr has joined #openstack-swift | 10:30 | |
*** sudorandom has quit IRC | 10:31 | |
*** hseipp has joined #openstack-swift | 10:31 | |
*** hseipp has quit IRC | 10:31 | |
*** hseipp has joined #openstack-swift | 10:31 | |
*** jmccarthy has quit IRC | 10:32 | |
*** jmccarthy has joined #openstack-swift | 10:33 | |
*** CrackerJackMack has quit IRC | 10:34 | |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/swift: Replace string slicing with proper string methods https://review.openstack.org/235950 | 10:37 |
*** asettle has joined #openstack-swift | 10:37 | |
*** CrackerJackMack has joined #openstack-swift | 10:38 | |
*** yatin has joined #openstack-swift | 10:39 | |
*** sudorandom has joined #openstack-swift | 10:41 | |
*** CrackerJackMack has quit IRC | 10:43 | |
*** sudorandom has quit IRC | 10:46 | |
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC | 10:47 | |
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-swift | 10:50 | |
*** sudorandom has joined #openstack-swift | 10:50 | |
*** mandarine has left #openstack-swift | 10:51 | |
*** CrackerJackMack has joined #openstack-swift | 10:52 | |
openstackgerrit | OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/swift: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/88736 | 10:53 |
*** yatin has quit IRC | 10:53 | |
*** yatin has joined #openstack-swift | 10:54 | |
*** yatin has quit IRC | 10:55 | |
*** wupeiran has quit IRC | 10:56 | |
*** haypo has joined #openstack-swift | 11:07 | |
haypo | hi. the python34 check job now pass thanks to the last change on PyEClib (use PyEClib >= 1.0.7) | 11:08 |
haypo | it's time to make python34 check job voting! https://review.openstack.org/#/c/253445/ | 11:08 |
haypo | a voting job would avoid to reintroduce Python 3 regressions, see the global plan: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-October/078058.html | 11:09 |
*** SkyRocknRoll has quit IRC | 11:31 | |
*** SkyRocknRoll has joined #openstack-swift | 11:33 | |
*** Guest20179 has quit IRC | 11:34 | |
*** eranrom has quit IRC | 11:36 | |
*** yatin has joined #openstack-swift | 11:41 | |
*** noqa_v_q1ovnie is now known as noqa_v_qoovnie | 11:48 | |
*** yatin has quit IRC | 11:54 | |
*** ppai has quit IRC | 12:05 | |
*** links has quit IRC | 12:15 | |
*** flaper87 has quit IRC | 12:17 | |
*** flaper87 has joined #openstack-swift | 12:17 | |
*** ppai has joined #openstack-swift | 12:17 | |
*** kei_yama has quit IRC | 12:21 | |
*** cdelatte has joined #openstack-swift | 12:22 | |
*** chlong has joined #openstack-swift | 12:30 | |
*** silor has joined #openstack-swift | 12:38 | |
*** asettle has quit IRC | 12:44 | |
*** SkyRocknRoll has quit IRC | 12:51 | |
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC | 12:56 | |
*** dustins has joined #openstack-swift | 13:02 | |
openstackgerrit | pei ran wu proposed openstack/swift: Fix POST-as-COPY mess up the DLO manifest https://review.openstack.org/252791 | 13:20 |
hferenc | thanks guys for the reviews | 13:21 |
*** fthiagogv has joined #openstack-swift | 13:34 | |
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-swift | 13:36 | |
*** fthiagogv has quit IRC | 13:36 | |
*** fthiagogv has joined #openstack-swift | 13:37 | |
*** fthiagogv has quit IRC | 13:38 | |
*** fthiagogv has joined #openstack-swift | 13:39 | |
*** ppai has quit IRC | 13:51 | |
*** jerrygb has joined #openstack-swift | 14:04 | |
*** dustins has quit IRC | 14:07 | |
*** sanchitmalhotra has quit IRC | 14:08 | |
*** hogepodge has quit IRC | 14:17 | |
*** breitz has joined #openstack-swift | 14:18 | |
*** petertr7_away is now known as petertr7 | 14:28 | |
*** barker has joined #openstack-swift | 14:37 | |
*** raginbajin has quit IRC | 14:44 | |
*** raginbajin has joined #openstack-swift | 14:46 | |
*** sgundur has joined #openstack-swift | 14:52 | |
*** badari has joined #openstack-swift | 14:54 | |
*** blmartin has joined #openstack-swift | 14:58 | |
*** CaioBrentano has joined #openstack-swift | 15:00 | |
*** diazjf has joined #openstack-swift | 15:12 | |
*** hogepodge has joined #openstack-swift | 15:14 | |
*** dustins has joined #openstack-swift | 15:15 | |
openstackgerrit | dharmendra kushwaha proposed openstack/swift: Doc string addition for some methods. https://review.openstack.org/239993 | 15:22 |
*** delattec has joined #openstack-swift | 15:23 | |
*** cdelatte has quit IRC | 15:26 | |
CaioBrentano | hi all | 15:28 |
CaioBrentano | is the "official" way of deleting a header making a POST request with "X-Remove-<header_name>" header ? | 15:29 |
*** tsg has joined #openstack-swift | 15:31 | |
*** sayali has quit IRC | 15:32 | |
*** sayali has joined #openstack-swift | 15:34 | |
*** eranrom has joined #openstack-swift | 15:38 | |
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC | 15:39 | |
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-swift | 15:40 | |
*** changbl has quit IRC | 15:42 | |
*** changbl has joined #openstack-swift | 15:46 | |
*** ntt has quit IRC | 15:49 | |
*** pgbridge has joined #openstack-swift | 15:50 | |
*** changbl has quit IRC | 15:53 | |
*** petertr7 is now known as petertr7_away | 15:57 | |
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC | 16:01 | |
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-swift | 16:01 | |
openstackgerrit | Béla Vancsics proposed openstack/swift: Reduce code duplication https://review.openstack.org/254266 | 16:03 |
*** barker has quit IRC | 16:05 | |
*** changbl has joined #openstack-swift | 16:06 | |
*** petertr7_away is now known as petertr7 | 16:08 | |
*** barker has joined #openstack-swift | 16:08 | |
*** bkmz has joined #openstack-swift | 16:14 | |
*** cdelatte has joined #openstack-swift | 16:14 | |
*** delattec has quit IRC | 16:15 | |
*** bkmz_ has quit IRC | 16:17 | |
openstackgerrit | janonymous proposed openstack/swift: remove all pyc before starting unit test https://review.openstack.org/254276 | 16:17 |
*** janonymous_ has joined #openstack-swift | 16:17 | |
*** dustins_ has joined #openstack-swift | 16:18 | |
*** dustins has quit IRC | 16:19 | |
*** sgundur has quit IRC | 16:19 | |
*** sgundur has joined #openstack-swift | 16:22 | |
openstackgerrit | dharmendra kushwaha proposed openstack/swift: Removing unused variables and clause https://review.openstack.org/254278 | 16:22 |
*** dustins_ is now known as dustins | 16:23 | |
*** dustins has quit IRC | 16:25 | |
*** dustins has joined #openstack-swift | 16:27 | |
*** aix has quit IRC | 16:28 | |
*** dustins has quit IRC | 16:31 | |
*** dustins has joined #openstack-swift | 16:32 | |
*** ndk has joined #openstack-swift | 16:39 | |
notmyname | good morning | 16:40 |
*** Jeffrey4l has joined #openstack-swift | 16:41 | |
notmyname | CaioBrentano: are you wanting to remove a key for object metadata or for container metadata? | 16:41 |
*** Jeffrey4l has quit IRC | 16:42 | |
*** Jeffrey4l has joined #openstack-swift | 16:42 | |
CaioBrentano | notmyname both! :) | 16:42 |
notmyname | CaioBrentano: ok :-) | 16:42 |
*** geaaru has joined #openstack-swift | 16:43 | |
notmyname | for account and contianer metadata, use the form you mentioned. or POST with the header and an empty value. some clients (eg older curl versions) don't allow sending headers with empty values, thus the -remove- syntax version | 16:43 |
notmyname | for object metadata, the entirety of the metadata is set to what you POST to the object. so leave out the header you want to delete, and it will be effectively removed | 16:44 |
*** jordanP has quit IRC | 16:45 | |
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-swift | 16:49 | |
CaioBrentano | notmyname but if I want to remove "Cache-Control" metadata from a object, I'll have to re-create the entire object ? | 16:50 |
*** Jeffrey4l has quit IRC | 16:50 | |
janonymous_ | notmyname: hey | 16:51 |
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC | 16:51 | |
notmyname | CaioBrentano: so you've configured your object servers to allow setting cache-control? | 16:51 |
CaioBrentano | notmyname yes. anything bad about this? | 16:52 |
notmyname | no, not at all | 16:53 |
*** links has joined #openstack-swift | 16:53 | |
notmyname | CaioBrentano: yeah, so either sending cache-control with an empty value or using something like "x-remove-cache-control: x" would do it | 16:55 |
notmyname | just remember that your metadata is set to whatever you're sending in the post | 16:58 |
CaioBrentano | notmyname I tried sending cache-control with an empty value, but I didn't work... I got the header empty when a did a GET with curl | 16:59 |
CaioBrentano | notmyname I just worked with x-remove... and btw, I just found this on a random blog post, not on the documentation | 17:00 |
*** nadeem has joined #openstack-swift | 17:00 | |
*** barker has quit IRC | 17:05 | |
notmyname | CaioBrentano: ugh. yeah. the docs need a lot of love | 17:07 |
*** barker has joined #openstack-swift | 17:08 | |
*** diazjf has quit IRC | 17:09 | |
CaioBrentano | notmyname :) | 17:09 |
*** jistr has quit IRC | 17:11 | |
CaioBrentano | notmyname my team and I are planing to create a blog about Swift... to help other teams in our company that are using our cluster, and to share with some knowledge about swift in portuguese ;) | 17:11 |
notmyname | that's great! | 17:11 |
*** links has quit IRC | 17:14 | |
*** trifon has quit IRC | 17:14 | |
*** Jeffrey4l has joined #openstack-swift | 17:15 | |
*** rledisez has quit IRC | 17:16 | |
*** petertr7 is now known as petertr7_away | 17:22 | |
*** lyrrad has joined #openstack-swift | 17:25 | |
*** sgundur1 has joined #openstack-swift | 17:26 | |
*** sgundur has quit IRC | 17:26 | |
*** petertr7_away is now known as petertr7 | 17:32 | |
*** diazjf has joined #openstack-swift | 17:48 | |
openstackgerrit | Sivasathurappan Radhakrishnan proposed openstack/swift: Added unit test cases for common/bufferedhttp.py https://review.openstack.org/244678 | 17:49 |
clayg | kota_: did you see that the fix for lp bug #1452431 (patch 241571) had a dependent patch with a doc update that goes into the terms for replica plan? | 17:50 |
openstack | Launchpad bug 1452431 in OpenStack Object Storage (swift) "some parts replicas assigned to duplicate devices in the ring" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1452431 - Assigned to Samuel Merritt (torgomatic) | 17:50 |
patchbot | clayg: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/241571/ - Put part-replicas where they go | 17:50 |
clayg | dfg: did you have anything for me on patch 241571 | 17:51 |
patchbot | clayg: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/241571/ - Put part-replicas where they go | 17:51 |
*** petertr7 is now known as petertr7_away | 17:52 | |
acoles | clayg: i gather all got sorted out wrt Lorcan's tests | 17:53 |
*** diazjf has quit IRC | 17:54 | |
*** arnox has quit IRC | 17:55 | |
clayg | acoles: yup we're good! | 17:57 |
clayg | acoles: Lorcan did great, those tests were great, we learned something; but I at least decided it's an acceptable/desirable behavior change from master => patch | 17:58 |
acoles | clayg: right. I am sat by him this week so I'll let him know | 17:59 |
*** jistr has joined #openstack-swift | 17:59 | |
*** hseipp has quit IRC | 18:04 | |
*** petertr7_away is now known as petertr7 | 18:07 | |
*** barker has quit IRC | 18:08 | |
*** lyrrad has quit IRC | 18:10 | |
*** lyrrad_ has joined #openstack-swift | 18:10 | |
*** barker has joined #openstack-swift | 18:14 | |
*** zaitcev has joined #openstack-swift | 18:17 | |
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v zaitcev | 18:17 | |
*** vinsh_ is now known as Vinsh | 18:19 | |
openstackgerrit | Clay Gerrard proposed openstack/swift: fix mock and assert in test_direct_client https://review.openstack.org/254341 | 18:19 |
*** trifon has joined #openstack-swift | 18:30 | |
*** papercup has joined #openstack-swift | 18:31 | |
papercup | do functional test need to be run one one-go only ? or can we run them independent of each other ? (I know tox has the option to do ti .. what I don't know is how the openstack-swift func tests are designed .. | 18:32 |
papercup | ideally tests are supposed to be independent of each other for being able to pick one out and run one test specifically .. but .. I don't know the case for swift tetss | 18:33 |
*** klrmn1 has joined #openstack-swift | 18:35 | |
openstackgerrit | Tim Burke proposed openstack/python-swiftclient: Move python-keystoneclient to "extras" https://review.openstack.org/254346 | 18:38 |
openstackgerrit | Tim Burke proposed openstack/python-swiftclient: Stop passing attr to keystoneclient when there's no filter_value https://review.openstack.org/246040 | 18:44 |
*** geaaru has quit IRC | 18:46 | |
*** chsc has joined #openstack-swift | 18:47 | |
*** trifon has quit IRC | 18:55 | |
*** blmartin has quit IRC | 19:01 | |
jrichli | papercup: yes, you can run swift functests individually. I use this type of format: nosetests test/functional/testFilename.py:TestClassname.test_method_name | 19:03 |
*** acoles is now known as acoles_ | 19:12 | |
*** garthb has joined #openstack-swift | 19:16 | |
*** fthiagogv has quit IRC | 19:22 | |
*** tsg has quit IRC | 19:24 | |
*** jistr has quit IRC | 19:26 | |
*** diazjf has joined #openstack-swift | 19:30 | |
clayg | heyoh! | 19:32 |
*** ChubYann has joined #openstack-swift | 19:40 | |
*** diazjf has quit IRC | 19:45 | |
*** diazjf has joined #openstack-swift | 19:56 | |
*** trifon has joined #openstack-swift | 19:58 | |
*** Zyric has joined #openstack-swift | 20:00 | |
Zyric | Good morning :) | 20:04 |
*** petertr7 is now known as petertr7_away | 20:22 | |
*** aerwin3 has joined #openstack-swift | 20:25 | |
aerwin3 | hello all | 20:26 |
*** klrmn1 has quit IRC | 20:27 | |
*** petertr7_away is now known as petertr7 | 20:29 | |
*** changbl has quit IRC | 20:35 | |
*** barker has quit IRC | 20:37 | |
*** haypo has left #openstack-swift | 20:41 | |
*** diazjf has quit IRC | 20:46 | |
papercup | jrichli: thanks | 20:48 |
*** trifon has quit IRC | 20:50 | |
*** CaioBrentano has quit IRC | 21:05 | |
*** blmartin has joined #openstack-swift | 21:05 | |
*** eranrom has quit IRC | 21:13 | |
*** petertr7 is now known as petertr7_away | 21:14 | |
*** petertr7_away is now known as petertr7 | 21:16 | |
*** pdardeau_ has quit IRC | 21:18 | |
*** silor has quit IRC | 21:20 | |
*** changbl has joined #openstack-swift | 21:21 | |
*** pdardeau has joined #openstack-swift | 21:28 | |
*** mariusv has joined #openstack-swift | 21:30 | |
*** mariusv has quit IRC | 21:30 | |
*** mariusv has joined #openstack-swift | 21:30 | |
*** alejandrito has joined #openstack-swift | 21:36 | |
*** klrmn1 has joined #openstack-swift | 21:36 | |
mattoliverau | Morning | 21:37 |
*** dustins is now known as dustins|gone | 21:38 | |
*** ianbrown has quit IRC | 21:39 | |
*** ianbrown has joined #openstack-swift | 21:39 | |
*** chsc has quit IRC | 21:57 | |
*** changbl has quit IRC | 21:59 | |
*** tongli has joined #openstack-swift | 21:59 | |
peluse | mattoliverau: yo! | 22:00 |
*** tongli has quit IRC | 22:01 | |
gmmaha | good morning mattoliverau | 22:06 |
*** yarkot has joined #openstack-swift | 22:13 | |
*** sgundur has joined #openstack-swift | 22:17 | |
*** sgundur1 has quit IRC | 22:17 | |
*** petertr7 is now known as petertr7_away | 22:23 | |
*** yarkot has quit IRC | 22:28 | |
*** mariusv_ has joined #openstack-swift | 22:29 | |
*** diogogmt has joined #openstack-swift | 22:32 | |
*** mariusv_ has quit IRC | 22:32 | |
*** asettle has joined #openstack-swift | 22:32 | |
*** asettle has quit IRC | 22:33 | |
*** alexandra_ is now known as asettle | 22:33 | |
*** changbl has joined #openstack-swift | 22:44 | |
*** mariusv has quit IRC | 22:45 | |
mattoliverau | peluse: good to hear your voice ;) | 22:46 |
*** sgundur has quit IRC | 22:47 | |
mattoliverau | gmmaha: o/, cool so your going to go look into the global clusters card, nice :) | 22:49 |
peluse | mattoliverau: yeah, nice to finally make one of those meetings :) | 22:49 |
mattoliverau | peluse: mikal had to go poke me, cause people forget to send me meeting invites. | 22:50 |
peluse | mattoliverau: I get the invites OK, I just tend to forget to go... | 22:51 |
mattoliverau | lol | 22:51 |
peluse | :) | 22:51 |
mattoliverau | peluse: did you get a chance to talk about part power increase, is that still a thing we want to try and push forward? | 22:53 |
mattoliverau | Seeing as I'm spending time on sharding, and IBM have committed resources to it, I want to get that moved into doing to track that stuff is actually happening in the community. But baby steps I guess. | 22:54 |
openstackgerrit | John Dickinson proposed openstack/python-swiftclient: fix release version https://review.openstack.org/254430 | 22:55 |
notmyname | so because this is the first swiftclient release of the mitaka cycle, and because swiftclient is now a release-managed project, the release number has to be 2.7.0 instead of 2.6.1 | 22:56 |
notmyname | fortunately, nothing else landed yet, so it's just updating the changelog and the referenced commit sha for the release | 22:57 |
pdardeau | mattoliverau: hey | 23:00 |
*** gyee has joined #openstack-swift | 23:01 | |
*** km has joined #openstack-swift | 23:08 | |
*** km is now known as Guest84101 | 23:08 | |
mattoliverau | pdardeau: hey, nice to meet you face to face (well text to text) :) | 23:08 |
pdardeau | mattoliverau: :) likewise! | 23:09 |
pdardeau | mattoliverau: i'll be picking up part power increase | 23:09 |
mattoliverau | pdardeau: sweet, cool! | 23:09 |
pdardeau | mattoliverau: after increasing max number of devices | 23:09 |
notmyname | pdardeau: oh, cool. I had heard somehting about increasing max devices. we're (swiftstack) also really interested in that | 23:10 |
mattoliverau | pdardeau: just wanted to make sure I was on the same page :) | 23:10 |
mattoliverau | pdardeau: awesome, with those changes in place, swift will be alot easier to operate :) | 23:11 |
pdardeau | mattoliverau: notmyname: nice! it's nice to have my marathon training winding down and be able to do some work :) | 23:12 |
notmyname | pdardeau: what is it you're working on for increasing the max number of devices? what's the use case behind it? | 23:12 |
*** ianbrown has quit IRC | 23:12 | |
*** ianbrown has joined #openstack-swift | 23:12 | |
pdardeau | notmyname: good question! i was wondering about that myself. | 23:12 |
pdardeau | i don't know, just heard about it this morning | 23:13 |
pdardeau | it looks like someone from rax requested it (haven't seen any background info yet) | 23:13 |
notmyname | I'm not aware of any single storage policies that are getting close to 2**15 devices, much less 2**16 | 23:14 |
pdardeau | i too was quite surprised to see the request | 23:15 |
notmyname | but that being said, I know we've had some requests about that sort of thing. just nothing in prod yet | 23:15 |
notmyname | pdardeau: instead of just raising the 16 bit number to 32 bits, I'd love it if you could investigate something like "write the right number of bits for however many devs are in the ring" | 23:16 |
notmyname | that way there isn't any particular limit | 23:16 |
notmyname | and yeah if you have 2**128 devices in your ring, you better have a *lot* of ram in your machines ;-) | 23:17 |
mattoliverau | lol | 23:18 |
pdardeau | notmyname: cool idea! might be tricky as the device count crosses thresholds? | 23:18 |
*** jamielennox is now known as jamielennox|away | 23:18 | |
notmyname | (wasn't my idea originally) | 23:19 |
notmyname | but it's only a matter of serialization, right? | 23:19 |
notmyname | ie it doesn't matter if one server has 2**16 bits and another has 2**17 bits, does it? | 23:19 |
notmyname | it's just how it reads and writes it into memory? | 23:19 |
notmyname | what are you thinking of in the cross threshold area? | 23:20 |
pdardeau | i think you just addressed it | 23:20 |
pdardeau | i was thinking of the servers all needing the same value | 23:21 |
pdardeau | and timing of changes across the cluster | 23:21 |
pdardeau | sounds easy enough tho | 23:22 |
notmyname | yeah. while it's something that's sortof annoyed me about a "limit" in swift, it's also somehting I always figured was no big deal to change when someone actually needed it | 23:22 |
notmyname | only "trick" is to make sure we version the ring. but that's with any data format change. | 23:23 |
notmyname | I think we added a ring version with the last time we changed the on-disk format | 23:23 |
pdardeau | cool. makes sense | 23:24 |
notmyname | I mean, don't take my word for it. but yeah, I think it's already there. at least it should be :-) | 23:24 |
pdardeau | gotcha! | 23:25 |
dfg | clayg: ok- added a review. | 23:26 |
dfg | hope it makes any sense at all. | 23:28 |
notmyname | reading it now. thanks :-) | 23:28 |
notmyname | dfg: when you added the 2nd 90 drive node, did you do a pretend_min_part_hours_passed before that? | 23:31 |
notmyname | fromt eh stuff at the bottom of the comment | 23:31 |
*** kei_yama has joined #openstack-swift | 23:34 | |
dfg | notmyname: pretend? no- i didn't know you could do that | 23:35 |
dfg | i didn't mess with min_part_hours at all for those results. | 23:36 |
mattoliverau | dfg: it's not in the help output, but is a command in the code.. I always forget the name and have to go look it up :P | 23:37 |
dfg | mattoliverau: i'm shocked we have undocumented features :p | 23:37 |
mattoliverau | dfg: not undocumented... easter eggs ;P | 23:40 |
*** ianbrown has quit IRC | 23:41 | |
*** ianbrown has joined #openstack-swift | 23:42 | |
notmyname | IIRC it's intentionally undocumented | 23:45 |
mattoliverau | yeah, just teasing :) wouldn't want that to be documented | 23:46 |
clayg | i like easer egg | 23:46 |
clayg | *easter* | 23:47 |
clayg | does it really matter which *number* partition moves? | 23:47 |
*** ho has joined #openstack-swift | 23:48 | |
clayg | dfg: I think the bump is just showing you why the new code is more efficient - when it picks a point in the partition ring to start gathering from it pulls up enough parts that can/should move and then it's done with it - the old algo would just keep going over the ring again and again randomly picking up some parts here and there hoping it's able to do something useful | 23:49 |
clayg | dfg: the code could skip around the ring more... but why? | 23:49 |
clayg | what's the difference in picking up parts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 1, 3, 7, 11 | 23:49 |
clayg | esp. when the replicas of parts 1, 2, 3, 4 are all on different nodes | 23:50 |
*** nadeem has quit IRC | 23:51 | |
clayg | anyway, there's nothing I can do about the current's code crappy placement causing a bunch of drives to want to shed/gain one or two parts and the new code being good at doing it - rather than I "warning" I think the swift release should strongly encourage folks to "fix" their rings by running rebalance with the new algo asap (rather than waiting for your regularlly scheduled capacity adjustment) | 23:52 |
clayg | dfg: anyway, thanks for looking at it - I honestly hadn't even considered cutting at it from that direction | 23:54 |
clayg | dfg: I think the confirmation on doing a good job distributing the gathered parts from all nodes in the system when adding capacity is great to have verified externally - awesome work | 23:55 |
notmyname | dfg: importantly, I didn't see you add a -1 or -2 to the patch with your review | 23:57 |
notmyname | dfg: so either you want some more time to look at / understand some of the results you got, or you're fine with it landing (ie not blocking it) | 23:58 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!