Tuesday, 2015-08-18

*** chsc has quit IRC00:01
openstackgerritHisashi Osanai proposed openstack/swift: Add functional test for access control (PUT ACL) with Keystone  https://review.openstack.org/21360800:05
*** tongli has quit IRC00:10
openstackgerritHisashi Osanai proposed openstack/swift: Add functional test for access control (DELETE ACL) with Keystone  https://review.openstack.org/21362900:13
openstackgerritHisashi Osanai proposed openstack/swift: Add functional test for access control (GET ACL) with Keystone  https://review.openstack.org/21393400:18
*** robefran has quit IRC00:20
openstackgerritHisashi Osanai proposed openstack/swift: Add functional test for access control (HEAD ACL) with Keystone  https://review.openstack.org/21394500:30
claygpeluse1: have you tried playing with the concurrency setting in the reconstructor?00:33
*** lyrrad has quit IRC00:36
openstackgerritTim Burke proposed openstack/swift: Add the ability to specify ranges for SLO segments  https://review.openstack.org/21172600:38
openstackgerritHisashi Osanai proposed openstack/swift: Add functional test for access control (POST ACL) with Keystone  https://review.openstack.org/21394800:43
openstackgerritHisashi Osanai proposed openstack/swift: Add functional test for access control (OPTIONS ACL) with Keystone  https://review.openstack.org/21394900:54
*** jkugel has joined #openstack-swift01:05
*** jkugel has quit IRC01:06
peluse1clayg, my laptop is dead so I'm sorta out of commission here for a bit(spilled water on it).  But no, I haven't played with that setting in the past01:11
*** jkugel has joined #openstack-swift01:12
openstackgerritHisashi Osanai proposed openstack/swift: Add functional test for access control (GET INFO) with Keystone  https://review.openstack.org/21281001:15
*** robefran has joined #openstack-swift01:17
*** jkugel1 has joined #openstack-swift01:18
*** zhill_ has quit IRC01:19
*** jkugel has quit IRC01:19
openstackgerritMerged openstack/swift: Time synchronization check in recon.  https://review.openstack.org/19256201:21
openstackgerritMerged openstack/swift: go: replicator rewrite  https://review.openstack.org/21129601:23
openstackgerritHisashi Osanai proposed openstack/swift: Add functional test for access control (HEAD INFO) with Keystone  https://review.openstack.org/21395401:24
*** esker has joined #openstack-swift01:30
openstackgerritOpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/swift: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/8873601:31
openstackgerritHisashi Osanai proposed openstack/swift: Add functional test for access control (OPTIONS INFO) with Keystone  https://review.openstack.org/21395501:32
*** esker has quit IRC01:36
*** bill_az has quit IRC01:37
openstackgerritHisashi Osanai proposed openstack/swift: Add functional test for access control (COPY ACL) with Keystone  https://review.openstack.org/21282501:50
openstackgerritHisashi Osanai proposed openstack/swift: Add functional test for access control (COPY ACL) with Keystone  https://review.openstack.org/21282501:54
*** nexusz99 has quit IRC01:56
*** janonymous has quit IRC01:57
*** nexusz99 has joined #openstack-swift02:00
*** sakaYK has quit IRC02:02
*** Kennan2 has joined #openstack-swift02:02
*** Kennan has quit IRC02:03
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-swift02:06
openstackgerritHisashi Osanai proposed openstack/swift: Add functional test for access control (COPY ACL) with Keystone  https://review.openstack.org/21282502:10
*** baojg has joined #openstack-swift02:31
*** bkopilov has quit IRC02:32
openstackgerritHisashi Osanai proposed openstack/swift: Enable Object Replicator's failure count in recon  https://review.openstack.org/13834202:40
*** jrichli has joined #openstack-swift02:42
*** logan2 has quit IRC02:44
*** esker has joined #openstack-swift02:51
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC03:01
*** baojg has quit IRC03:02
*** haomaiwa_ has joined #openstack-swift03:02
*** esker has quit IRC03:02
*** esker has joined #openstack-swift03:04
*** dbarman1 has quit IRC03:10
*** baojg has joined #openstack-swift03:15
*** sanchitmalhotra has joined #openstack-swift03:16
*** jkugel1 has left #openstack-swift03:21
notmynamegood evening03:22
*** thumpba has joined #openstack-swift03:25
*** esker has quit IRC03:26
*** esker has joined #openstack-swift03:26
*** changbl has quit IRC03:30
*** logan2 has joined #openstack-swift03:34
*** esker has quit IRC03:37
*** esker has joined #openstack-swift03:38
*** sakaYK has joined #openstack-swift03:41
*** sakaYK has quit IRC03:42
honotmyname: good evening!03:48
jrichlinotmyname ho: good evening03:49
notmynamejrichli: I was looking over some of the encryption TODOs from trello03:49
*** baojg has quit IRC03:49
notmynamejrichli: first, I put the "big stuff" you highlighted up at the top of the "to do" column03:50
hojrichli: good evening!03:50
jrichlinotmyname: thanks!  I didn't realize there could be an ordering in the column03:51
notmynamejrichli: am I correct in understanding that the multi-range GET support for encrypted objects is dependent on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/211726/ (the SLOrang patch from timburke)?03:51
jrichlinotmyname: yes, if we want to use those utilities directly.  Probably will.03:52
notmynameok, thanks03:53
claygsloranges are helping!?  no way03:55
jrichli:-)03:55
jrichliwell, the bit where it has support to de-mime a multi-part mime response03:57
notmynamesloranges should have some reference to this in the tests https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ts-9p3O4TWM03:57
*** bkopilov has joined #openstack-swift03:58
*** esker has quit IRC03:58
*** esker has joined #openstack-swift04:00
jrichlinotmyname: omg.  you are killin me04:01
*** haomaiwa_ has quit IRC04:01
notmynametimburke: ^04:02
*** haomaiwa_ has joined #openstack-swift04:02
jrichlihow do you find stuff like that?04:02
notmynameI saw it a long time ago and think of it when the word "orange" comes up.04:02
openstackgerritHamdi Roumani proposed openstack/swift: Doc instructions for post rebase steps  https://review.openstack.org/20866904:03
hoacoles_: I wrote a summary for adding functional test. Please use this for your review. http://paste.openstack.org/show/419948/04:07
hoacoles_: the most important one is No.1 (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/202411/)04:08
*** ppai has joined #openstack-swift04:09
notmynamehmm...why aren't unit tests passing on my saio on master?04:12
*** esker has quit IRC04:13
*** esker has joined #openstack-swift04:13
*** esker has quit IRC04:14
*** esker has joined #openstack-swift04:14
*** baojg has joined #openstack-swift04:16
*** bill_az has joined #openstack-swift04:18
*** esker has quit IRC04:20
*** nexusz99 has quit IRC04:23
jrichlinotmyname: I will see if they fail for me as well04:24
*** NM has joined #openstack-swift04:24
*** NM has quit IRC04:26
*** thumpba has quit IRC04:33
notmynametdasilva: https://bugs.launchpad.net/swift/+bug/148583904:33
openstackLaunchpad bug 1485839 in OpenStack Object Storage (swift) "update versioning docs" [Medium,New] - Assigned to Thiago da Silva (thiagodasilva)04:33
*** thumpba has joined #openstack-swift04:34
*** nexusz99 has joined #openstack-swift04:36
notmynametimburke: kota_: for swift3, see http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-August/072140.html04:37
notmynameand kota_ isn't online :-(04:38
jrichlinotmyname: if I run with just tox, they pass.  If I run with .unittests, the dont04:38
notmynamejrichli: well that's not good. thanks for the confirmation04:38
lifeless~04:39
jrichlinp04:39
notmynamejrichli: what are you getting from .unittests?04:39
honotmyname, jrichli: I passed unittest on latest master04:40
jrichliFAILED (errors=12)04:40
jrichliI get stuff like "LookupError: Entry point 'versioned_writes' not found in egg 'swift'"04:41
notmynamejrichli: ok, that's because you haven't run `python ./setup.py develop` or whatever that tox command clayg uses to install the new middleware04:42
notmynameho: interesting04:43
jrichlisorry, thought i did - just checked history tho, and i guess i didnt04:43
notmynameFAILED (errors=12, failures=7) for unit tests for me04:44
honotmyname: Ran 4089 tests in 283.343s OK (tox -epy27)04:45
jrichliok, i re-ran after the develop step, and they all passed even when using .unittests04:46
honotmyname, jrichli:  Ran 4089 tests in 287.792s OK (./.unittest). both worked :-)04:46
notmynamewith tox I get FAILED (errors=41, failures=6)04:47
jrichliyikes!  what'd you do?04:47
hointeresting. my local branch is "already up to date." unn...04:50
hroujust rebased and ran unit tests, clean as well.04:51
jrichliI assume you tried rebuilding tox env?04:51
*** SkyRocknRoll has joined #openstack-swift04:51
notmynameya. i wouldn't be surprised if it's some dependency thing somewhere04:54
* notmyname just wanted to do a review...04:54
openstackgerritCarlos Cavanna proposed openstack/swift: Improving statistics sent to Graphite.  https://review.openstack.org/20265704:55
hoI'm not sure but around 2 weeks ago I executed "sudo pip install --upgrade -r test-requirements.txt".04:55
jrichliyep, i had to do that as well04:56
hrouho, yep you need that (if test-requirements changed) shameless plug for a review, patch 208669.  Hopefully that'll help folks out04:57
patchbothrou: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/208669/04:57
hrou* help new folks out that is.04:57
notmynametest.unit.common.middleware.test_dlo.TestDloGetManifest is the first failure I see04:59
*** haomaiwa_ has quit IRC05:01
*** zaitcev has quit IRC05:01
*** haomaiwa_ has joined #openstack-swift05:02
*** gyee has quit IRC05:04
*** thumpba has quit IRC05:07
*** thumpba has joined #openstack-swift05:08
*** thumpba has quit IRC05:08
*** nexusz99 has quit IRC05:10
hoI confirmed 33 tests in TestDloGetManifest worked from log. i.e. test_error_fetching_first_segment (test.unit.common.middleware.test_dlo.TestDloGetManifest) ... ok05:10
notmynamehttps://gist.github.com/notmyname/4c02928c9a1e4b7e1fe505:11
openstackgerritJohn Dickinson proposed openstack/swift: move global statement up a few lines  https://review.openstack.org/21400005:13
notmynameho: do you see an error about that ^ ?05:15
notmyname/home/swift/swift/test/unit/proxy/test_server.py:8544: SyntaxWarning: name '_test_sockets' is used prior to global declaration05:16
notmyname  global _test_sockets05:16
notmynamewhen you run unit tests05:16
honotmyname: I don't see the error on my env. why???05:18
ho:q05:19
hosorry...05:19
notmynameI think I found it05:26
*** nexusz99 has joined #openstack-swift05:26
notmynameI had the container_listing_limit set to 505:26
notmynameturns out, that's not big enough for tests to pass05:27
jrichliinteresting.  glad you found it!05:28
notmynameweird. I'm not getting the error about global now either05:28
jrichlifreaky.05:29
notmynameI still think it's a good change ;-)05:29
jrichliwell, I can sleep soundly now knowing that notmyname's issue is resolved :-)  night everyone!05:30
notmynameha05:30
*** jrichli has quit IRC05:31
notmynamenow I can get to that other stuff...05:32
hoi see. there are 6 objects in the container. (seg01-seg05 and catpicture.jpg). then get_container_listing via segment_listing_iterator tries to get them.05:32
notmynameyeah05:32
notmynameI had set it down to 5 to demo something and i forgot to set it back05:33
hoI didn't reach the answer from your backtrace. next time :-)05:35
*** ccavanna has joined #openstack-swift05:35
ccavannaHi. I have a question about the documentation.05:36
ccavannaRecently I created a documentation page for those who are starting work with Swift.05:36
notmynameyup05:36
ccavannanotmyname: Hi, I didn't see you online.05:36
ccavannaI ran into another error and I was wondering if it's worth documenting.05:37
ccavannaI did a rebase and I got this:05:37
notmynameprobably ;-)05:37
* notmyname is always online05:37
ccavannaYour dreams may be in HexChat-log form.05:37
ccavannaThis is the error.05:38
ccavannaTraceback (most recent call last):05:38
ccavanna  File "/usr/local/bin/swift-proxy-server", line 10, in <module>05:38
ccavanna    execfile(__file__)05:38
ccavanna  File "/home/swift/swift/bin/swift-proxy-server", line 23, in <module>05:38
ccavanna    sys.exit(run_wsgi(conf_file, 'proxy-server', **options))05:38
ccavanna  File "/home/swift/swift/swift/common/wsgi.py", line 888, in run_wsgi05:38
ccavanna    loadapp(conf_path, global_conf=global_conf)05:38
ccavanna  File "/home/swift/swift/swift/common/wsgi.py", line 390, in loadapp05:38
ccavanna    func(PipelineWrapper(ctx))05:38
ccavanna  File "/home/swift/swift/swift/proxy/server.py", line 602, in modify_wsgi_pipeline05:38
ccavanna    ctx = pipe.create_filter(filter_name)05:38
ccavanna  File "/home/swift/swift/swift/common/wsgi.py", line 329, in create_filter05:38
ccavanna    global_conf=self.context.global_conf)05:38
ccavanna  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paste/deploy/loadwsgi.py", line 296, in loadcontext05:38
ccavanna    global_conf=global_conf)05:38
ccavanna  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paste/deploy/loadwsgi.py", line 328, in _loadegg05:38
ccavanna    return loader.get_context(object_type, name, global_conf)05:38
ccavanna  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paste/deploy/loadwsgi.py", line 620, in get_context05:38
notmynamepastebin next time, please05:38
ccavanna    object_type, name=name)05:38
ccavanna  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paste/deploy/loadwsgi.py", line 659, in find_egg_entry_point05:38
ccavanna    for prot in protocol_options] or '(no entry points)'))))05:38
ccavannaLookupError: Entry point 'versioned_writes' not found in egg 'swift' (dir: /home/swift/swift; protocols: paste.filter_factory, paste.filter_app_factory; entry_points: )05:38
ccavannaI just had to rerun setup.py05:38
ccavannaand it was fixed.05:38
ccavannaOh, right, I forgot.05:39
hooh, needs hrou patch ASAP :-)05:39
hohttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/208669/305:39
ccavannaOh, right, it will depend on hrou's patch. He added something to my doc page.05:39
ccavannaIs it worth documenting? Or is it too specific?05:40
notmynameactually, that's exactly what hrou documented05:40
notmyname(effectively)05:40
notmynameie he didn't use the same words. but it has the same result05:40
notmynameand I see you've already reviewed it05:41
hrouccavanna, yep!  that should be covered by the post rebase instructions, but if you think something is missing, let me know !05:41
ccavannaYes, generically, for rebasing.05:42
*** silor has joined #openstack-swift05:42
ccavannaI was thinking about adding this to the troubleshooting section.05:42
ccavannaSo far, the troubleshooting section (which is very short) has one solution, run setup.py.05:43
ccavannaMy question is only about how specific this error is and if it is worth nothing in that section.05:43
notmynameccavanna: just before you logged in, jrichli had the same error. she knew how to fix it already, but still...05:44
notmynamepoint is, yeah, I think it's good to document05:44
ccavannaAlright. I will add another entry to the the troubleshooting section.05:44
notmynameccavanna: for reference (based on a commet you made, if possible it's best to not make dependent patches05:45
ccavannaOh, I was just thinking about making a dependent patch. :-)05:45
ccavannaIs it possible to get hrou's patch approved, then?05:46
ccavannahttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/208669/05:46
hohrou: you specified "sudo python setup.py develop". your prerequisite is people use swift with develop mode?05:46
*** silor has quit IRC05:46
hrouho, nope I don't think that matters, but that's a carry over from the SAIO instructions.05:47
hrouI wanted them to be consistent.05:47
ccavannaho: the doc page is for people who want to make their first contribution to swift.05:47
hohrou, ccavanna: i see. thanks for providing the patch!05:48
hrouho, thank you !  Its a good comment though, you could even question the 'sudo' too ; )05:48
hrounotmyname, curious, why do we prefer to avoid defendant patches, just less haste overall (which makes sense), or is there more to it ?05:50
ccavannamaybe because one pre-req patch may be rejected and if there are dependencies ...05:50
notmynameindependent patches can be reviewed and merged separately (ie more people looking) instead of serially05:50
notmynameright. that too05:50
notmynameas soon as you push a new patch set for a root patch, all dependencies are invalidated05:51
hrounotmyname, ccavanna, ah very good points, yea that would be a pain to say the least.05:51
hrouthanks!05:51
*** silor has joined #openstack-swift05:51
ccavannaok, I'll wait until hrou's patch is in, so I can also check out the latest version of the file. Easier to change that way, too.05:52
*** sanchitmalhotra1 has joined #openstack-swift05:57
*** sanchitmalhotra has quit IRC06:00
*** haomaiwa_ has quit IRC06:01
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-swift06:02
*** hezhiqiang has joined #openstack-swift06:20
*** hrou has quit IRC06:22
openstackgerritMerged openstack/swift: Fixes for mock 1.1  https://review.openstack.org/20713206:42
*** openstackgerrit_ has joined #openstack-swift06:42
*** bill_az has quit IRC06:44
openstackgerritMerged openstack/swift: Fixes for mock 1.1  https://review.openstack.org/20713106:45
*** akle|2 has quit IRC06:48
*** mfalatic has quit IRC06:57
*** akle has joined #openstack-swift06:59
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC07:01
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-swift07:02
*** rledisez has joined #openstack-swift07:02
*** occupant has quit IRC07:10
*** occupant has joined #openstack-swift07:18
*** akle has quit IRC07:22
*** SkyRocknRoll has quit IRC07:31
*** mahatic has joined #openstack-swift07:32
openstackgerritTushar Gohad proposed openstack/swift: Restrict PyECLib version to 1.0.7  https://review.openstack.org/21405407:39
*** geaaru has joined #openstack-swift07:45
*** SkyRocknRoll has joined #openstack-swift07:49
*** tsubic has joined #openstack-swift07:51
*** jistr has joined #openstack-swift07:55
*** sanchitmalhotra has joined #openstack-swift07:55
*** sanchitmalhotra1 has quit IRC07:57
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC08:01
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-swift08:02
*** jordanP has joined #openstack-swift08:05
*** ho has quit IRC08:05
*** sanchitmalhotra1 has joined #openstack-swift08:15
*** sanchitmalhotra has quit IRC08:18
*** occupwnt has joined #openstack-swift09:00
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC09:01
*** occupant has quit IRC09:01
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-swift09:02
*** occupwnt has quit IRC09:07
*** occupant has joined #openstack-swift09:12
*** sanchitmalhotra has joined #openstack-swift09:17
*** sanchitmalhotra1 has quit IRC09:19
*** sanchitmalhotra1 has joined #openstack-swift09:35
*** sanchitmalhotra has quit IRC09:38
*** hezhiqiang has quit IRC10:00
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC10:01
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-swift10:02
*** baojg has quit IRC10:06
*** baojg has joined #openstack-swift10:06
*** baojg has quit IRC10:07
*** baojg has joined #openstack-swift10:07
*** baojg has quit IRC10:07
*** baojg has joined #openstack-swift10:07
*** pbourke has quit IRC10:11
*** pgbridge has quit IRC10:15
*** ujjain has joined #openstack-swift10:17
*** ujjain has joined #openstack-swift10:17
*** baojg has quit IRC10:17
*** pgbridge has joined #openstack-swift10:17
*** baojg has joined #openstack-swift10:18
*** baojg has quit IRC10:23
*** sanchitmalhotra has joined #openstack-swift10:31
*** sanchitmalhotra1 has quit IRC10:33
*** sanchitmalhotra2 has joined #openstack-swift10:33
*** sanchitmalhotra has quit IRC10:35
openstackgerritCharles Hsu proposed openstack/python-swiftclient: Convert http response(byte string) to string in python3.  https://review.openstack.org/21364010:42
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC10:54
*** mahatic has quit IRC10:58
*** sc68cal has quit IRC11:02
*** acoles_ is now known as acoles11:03
*** sc68cal has joined #openstack-swift11:06
*** sc68cal has joined #openstack-swift11:06
*** sc68cal has quit IRC11:07
*** delattec has quit IRC11:10
*** cdelatte has quit IRC11:10
*** dbarman1 has joined #openstack-swift11:12
*** mahatic has joined #openstack-swift11:14
*** sc68cal has joined #openstack-swift11:16
*** sc68cal has joined #openstack-swift11:16
*** esker has joined #openstack-swift11:20
*** marcusvrn has joined #openstack-swift11:27
*** hezhiqiang has joined #openstack-swift11:29
*** cdelatte has joined #openstack-swift11:32
openstackgerritCharles Hsu proposed openstack/python-swiftclient: Increase httplib._MAXHEADERS to 256.  https://review.openstack.org/21414411:34
*** marcusvrn has quit IRC11:38
*** Protux has quit IRC11:39
*** esker has quit IRC11:50
*** esker has joined #openstack-swift11:51
*** bkopilov has quit IRC11:58
*** esker has quit IRC12:01
*** vinsh has quit IRC12:01
*** vinsh has joined #openstack-swift12:02
*** kei_yama has quit IRC12:05
*** petertr7_away is now known as petertr712:09
*** km has quit IRC12:14
*** robefran has quit IRC12:15
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-swift12:24
*** dbarman1 has quit IRC12:32
openstackgerritKazuhiro MIYAHARA proposed openstack/swift: Fix dispersion-reports error message  https://review.openstack.org/21369712:32
*** marcusvrn has joined #openstack-swift12:38
*** ppai has quit IRC12:47
*** marcusvrn has quit IRC12:49
*** chlong has joined #openstack-swift12:51
*** robefran has joined #openstack-swift12:53
*** arringtp_ has joined #openstack-swift13:00
*** arringtp_ is now known as shaggypaw13:01
openstackgerritKazuhiro MIYAHARA proposed openstack/swift: Fix dispersion-reports error message  https://review.openstack.org/21369713:01
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-swift13:03
openstackgerritKota Tsuyuzaki proposed openstack/swift: Don't merge this change  https://review.openstack.org/21417513:05
*** NM has joined #openstack-swift13:11
openstackgerritKota Tsuyuzaki proposed openstack/swift: Don't merge this change  https://review.openstack.org/21417513:12
*** thumpba has joined #openstack-swift13:13
*** thurloat_isgone has quit IRC13:14
*** swat30 has quit IRC13:16
*** thurloat has joined #openstack-swift13:17
*** swat30 has joined #openstack-swift13:18
*** changbl has joined #openstack-swift13:19
*** dustins has joined #openstack-swift13:20
*** bill_az has joined #openstack-swift13:21
*** shaggypaw has quit IRC13:22
*** thumpba has quit IRC13:22
*** swat30 has quit IRC13:23
*** thurloat has quit IRC13:23
*** hrou has joined #openstack-swift13:25
*** swat30 has joined #openstack-swift13:25
*** thurloat has joined #openstack-swift13:26
*** dustins has quit IRC13:26
openstackgerritKota Tsuyuzaki proposed openstack/swift: Add note for python3 installation  https://review.openstack.org/21418413:26
*** dustins has joined #openstack-swift13:26
*** thumpba has joined #openstack-swift13:29
*** SkyRocknRoll has quit IRC13:32
*** jrichli has joined #openstack-swift13:34
*** foexle has joined #openstack-swift13:34
*** onovy has quit IRC13:35
*** blmartin has joined #openstack-swift13:36
*** onovy has joined #openstack-swift13:37
EmilienMcschwede: thx a lot for your inputs on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/198695/13:39
*** changbl has quit IRC13:41
*** wbhuber has joined #openstack-swift13:42
*** bkopilov has joined #openstack-swift13:52
*** marcusvrn_ has joined #openstack-swift13:53
*** minwoob has joined #openstack-swift13:58
*** breitz has quit IRC13:59
*** breitz has joined #openstack-swift14:00
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC14:01
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-swift14:02
*** wbhuber has quit IRC14:03
*** esker has joined #openstack-swift14:12
*** wbhuber has joined #openstack-swift14:14
openstackgerritRichard Hawkins proposed openstack/swift: Modify functional tests to use testr  https://review.openstack.org/21420614:18
hurricanerixnotmyname: ^^^ There are a few things I am not completely happy with, but I figured I would just mark it as a WIP, and push it up to see how other people feel about it.14:19
*** annegentle has quit IRC14:20
*** lcurtis has joined #openstack-swift14:22
*** Protux has joined #openstack-swift14:28
mattoliveraumorning14:28
mattoliverauhurricanerix: good move (re WIP) :)14:28
hurricanerixmattoliverau: thanks14:29
*** zul has joined #openstack-swift14:29
hurricanerixI just added a comment with the two main concerns I have with the change in case anybody actually looks at it.14:30
*** wshao has joined #openstack-swift14:30
*** SkyRocknRoll has joined #openstack-swift14:33
*** SkyRocknRoll has quit IRC14:33
*** SkyRocknRoll has joined #openstack-swift14:33
mattoliveraugood thinking14:34
cschwedeEmilienM: you’re welcome! i need to have another look at the review after my current meeting14:41
*** jlhinson has joined #openstack-swift14:42
mattoliveraucschwede: o/ (it's wierd seeing you online in the morning)14:42
cschwedemattoliverau: Good Morning! Same for me, weird to see you online in the late afternoon ;)14:43
cschwedemattoliverau: still in Austin?14:43
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-swift14:44
acolescschwede: hi Christian we missed you last week!14:44
mattoliveraucschwede: in San Antonio (rackspace head office)14:44
mattoliverau+10014:44
jrichliYes, we missed you cschwede!14:44
acolesdid jrichli mail cschwede a cookie? :)14:45
*** ccavanna has quit IRC14:45
mattoliveraucschwede: I did my best to eat your share of all the bbq meat :P14:45
jrichlidarn ... i should have done that!14:45
cschwedeacoles: jrichli: Hello Alistair, Hello Janie! I missed you too - hope to see you soon somewhere else :D14:45
jrichliTokyo!14:45
cschwedejrichli: saw a photo, they looked incredible14:45
jrichlithx :-)14:46
acolescschwede: they were so well decorated they should not have been eaten. but they were :P14:47
jrichlinah - checkout the sugar art here http://oklahomasugarartists.com/14:50
jrichlilook at Photo Galleries -> Wedding Cakes14:51
*** haypo_ has joined #openstack-swift14:54
*** zul has quit IRC14:54
*** wshao has quit IRC14:55
*** foexle has quit IRC14:56
* acoles adds that ^^ to list of alternative career options14:56
jrichliacoles :-)14:58
*** lcurtis has quit IRC14:59
*** breitz has quit IRC14:59
*** rledisez has quit IRC14:59
*** haypo has quit IRC14:59
*** early has quit IRC14:59
*** mlanner has quit IRC14:59
*** MooingLemur has quit IRC14:59
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC15:01
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-swift15:02
pelusemorning all!15:03
*** kevinc_ has joined #openstack-swift15:03
*** breitz has joined #openstack-swift15:05
*** rledisez has joined #openstack-swift15:06
*** early has joined #openstack-swift15:06
mahaticacoles: and we'll follow you there too, asking questions about architecture :P15:06
*** MooingLemur has joined #openstack-swift15:07
*** lcurtis has joined #openstack-swift15:07
mahaticMorning peluse !15:07
*** zul has joined #openstack-swift15:09
*** izadorozhna has joined #openstack-swift15:10
*** mlanner has joined #openstack-swift15:12
*** peluse1 has quit IRC15:13
pelusemahatic, good morning again :)15:13
mahatic:)15:13
izadorozhnaHi team, I am a newcomer in this chat. I am trying to run swift functional tests against devstack. I took a config file from the Jenkins here http://logs.openstack.org/95/196395/8/check/gate-swift-dsvm-functional/397a230/logs/etc/swift/test.conf.txt.gz and changed only  auth_host to my devstack ip address. I'm getting an error http://paste.openstack.org/show/420618/. Maybe I am missing smth?15:16
izadorozhnaMy devstack is updated, i am on stable/kilo branch15:17
*** sslypushenko has joined #openstack-swift15:18
hrouacoles, jrichli - may want to take a peek at patch 214144 when you get a chance, seems like someone is debating about changing the default max headers.15:19
patchbothrou: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/214144/15:19
izadorozhnaI also tried to run the same test against real OpenStack, but I'm getting the same error. That's why i tried devstack, because tests are running through gate often15:19
jordanPizadorozhna, devstack should setup swift and etc/swift/test.conf correctly15:21
jordanPwhat I do is : ./stack.sh then cd /opt/swift/ and then run the swift func test with nosetests15:22
jordanP(you might want to run nosetests from a venv)15:22
izadorozhnajordanP: Yes, I'm running in a venv, but I'm running from my host machine and in etc/swift/test.conf on my host(not on devstack machine) I wrote the devstack ip address15:24
jordanPizadorozhna, right. I didn't test this setup, sorry15:25
izadorozhna jordanP: i checked /etc/swift/test.conf on my VM with devstack - it is the same I use on the host, that i took from Jenkins15:26
izadorozhna jordanP: so I hope that the test.conf is correct, also the devstack is correct because i set up it today and didn't use15:27
izadorozhna jordanP: I thought maybe I'm missing some detail or env variable..15:27
jordanPizadorozhna, what I would do it check that /etc/swift/test.conf is indeed used and that the users defined there match what's in proxy-server.conf15:28
*** ccavanna has joined #openstack-swift15:28
jordanPizadorozhna, but I can't help you further15:28
izadorozhnajordanP:  Thanx! i'll check proxy-server.conf. And maybe I'll try to run a test from VM with devstack to be sure it uses correct configs15:31
*** Protux has quit IRC15:36
*** marcusvrn_ has quit IRC15:36
*** zul has quit IRC15:46
*** nadeem has joined #openstack-swift15:48
*** nadeem has quit IRC15:52
*** nadeem has joined #openstack-swift15:52
*** mfalatic has joined #openstack-swift15:58
*** marcusvrn_ has joined #openstack-swift15:59
*** blmartin has quit IRC16:00
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC16:01
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-swift16:01
*** mfalatic_ has joined #openstack-swift16:03
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC16:04
*** mfalatic has quit IRC16:07
*** mfalatic_ is now known as mfalatic16:07
*** jistr has quit IRC16:08
*** npf has joined #openstack-swift16:11
*** wbhuber_ has joined #openstack-swift16:12
*** wbhuber has quit IRC16:12
*** lyrrad has joined #openstack-swift16:18
*** wbhuber_ is now known as wbhuber16:20
*** npf has quit IRC16:24
*** mahatic has quit IRC16:24
*** petertr7 is now known as petertr7_away16:28
openstackgerritAlistair Coles proposed openstack/swift: Keep user id and project id in subrequests env  https://review.openstack.org/21214916:31
izadorozhnaI also ran swift test on the Devstack VM for ensure that everything is updated, not used before, with right configs. But i'm still getting the same error http://paste.openstack.org/show/420724/16:32
*** Protux has joined #openstack-swift16:34
*** esker has quit IRC16:34
*** wshao has joined #openstack-swift16:36
*** izadorozhna has left #openstack-swift16:36
*** izadorozhna has joined #openstack-swift16:37
izadorozhnajordanP: ^^16:37
*** geaaru has quit IRC16:38
jordanPizadorozhna, this is weird.16:39
jordanPizadorozhna, it seems you are in /home/jane/swift/test/, does it make a difference if you run it from /opt/stack/swift ?16:39
*** annegentle has quit IRC16:41
*** rledisez has quit IRC16:42
izadorozhnajordanP: yes, all tests in (venv)jane@ubuntu:/opt/stack/swift/test/functional$ nosetests -v tests.py:TestObjectVersioning class passed now! Thank you very much!16:46
jordanPizadorozhna, that's good to know :) I hope I see some tempest patch from you soon :)16:48
jordanP(although you might be working on something else, I am just guessing)16:48
izadorozhnajordanP: thnx:)16:49
*** wshao has quit IRC16:49
*** thurloat is now known as thurloat_isgone16:50
*** SkyRocknRoll has quit IRC16:54
*** thurloat_isgone is now known as thurloat16:59
charzhrou: acoles thanks for review that.17:00
*** NM has quit IRC17:00
acolescharz: np17:02
*** jordanP has quit IRC17:02
acolescharz: thanks for explaining the scenario. so the func tests set more headers than swiftclient can then read. curious.17:04
charzacoles: yeah, I'm also surprise that.17:05
charzacoles: I think the headers number is defined in /etc/swift/test.conf and the default header number is 122.17:06
acolescharz: yeah, i'm just looking for the test that sets all those headers. really ought to clean up after its done.17:07
openstackgerritAlistair Coles proposed openstack/swift: Add POST capability to ssync for .meta files  https://review.openstack.org/13849817:07
*** NM has joined #openstack-swift17:10
*** haypo_ is now known as haypo17:10
*** chsc has joined #openstack-swift17:15
*** wshao has joined #openstack-swift17:24
*** zhill has joined #openstack-swift17:26
*** breitz has quit IRC17:42
*** changbl has joined #openstack-swift17:46
*** sanchitmalhotra has joined #openstack-swift17:49
*** petertr7_away is now known as petertr717:50
*** thurloat is now known as thurloat_isgone17:51
*** sanchitmalhotra2 has quit IRC17:51
*** wshao has quit IRC17:51
*** breitz has joined #openstack-swift17:52
*** zhill has quit IRC17:53
*** acoles is now known as acoles_17:57
*** lpabon has joined #openstack-swift17:58
*** thumpba has quit IRC18:00
*** thurloat_isgone is now known as thurloat18:00
claygheyoh!18:04
jrichlioh-ey18:04
*** thumpba has joined #openstack-swift18:04
*** zhill has joined #openstack-swift18:06
*** chlong has quit IRC18:06
openstackgerritJanie Richling proposed openstack/swift: Encrypting/Decrypting object metadata  https://review.openstack.org/20331018:06
jrichlimahatic: ^^ rebase on this now18:07
*** htruta has left #openstack-swift18:08
*** gyee has joined #openstack-swift18:08
*** chlong has joined #openstack-swift18:09
*** thumpba has quit IRC18:11
*** openstackgerrit_ has quit IRC18:11
*** zhill_ has joined #openstack-swift18:12
*** zhill has quit IRC18:12
openstackgerritMerged openstack/swift: Add a probetest for HUP/reload  https://review.openstack.org/20765618:15
hroucharz, acoles_ - thanks for clarifying !  I'm a bit surprised though why have others not run into this, I know the func test you speak of ; )  Because it is what I suspect encryption hit as well (but not on the client end of the spectrum).18:15
claygwhat's Eran's handle?  does he ever hang out in here?18:16
claygDoes anyone know him IRL - can we *get* him to hang out in here?18:16
claygI feel like I keep asking, but we only talk every 3 months18:17
claygi don't even know what tz he's in?18:17
hrouHey clayg I think its just eron, he's not on here to often but he's actually out of the office right now I believe.18:17
hrouHe's in Israel18:17
hrouI can make sure he comes on when he's back to chat ?18:17
*** thurloat is now known as thurloat_isgone18:19
jrichliclayg: I think its is eranrom18:19
hrouThanks jrichli, yep that's it18:19
hrouBut I speak to him often, so can easily ensure he's on (he's typically available in your timezone as well on given days).18:20
claygugh, that's terrible hours - our black out between cschwede and kota was the only time we had to sleep :'(18:20
claygthe sun never sets on the Swift Community18:21
hrouhaha he's right in the middle yea ; )18:21
hrouBut he's typically available late at night his time == now : )  So it'd be easy to arrange something.18:21
claygoh that's nice18:22
hrouLater this week should work, I'll double check and get back to you !18:22
clayghe just has a bunch of code up - the ability to real time some of the last-mile stuff could significantly reduce wall time18:22
hrouclayg, completely agree, I just started to review it my self as well.18:23
clayghrou: it's no problem - *I'm* not in a hurry to do a bunch of review work :P18:23
hrouclayg, haha ; )  Actually no I think its perfect I was going to say don't go out of your way to handle it in gerrit and let me just make him available, which will be much more efficient either way18:23
claygwell - no i have a bunch of pending comments that I need to submit on patch 205803 anwyay18:24
patchbotclayg: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/205803/18:24
clayghrou: let me finish running it and I'll throw up what I have - i need to look at my comments again - some of them might just be nits?18:25
hrouclayg, sure !  Yea he addressed your original comments re: checking the docs and renaming a class.18:26
hrouand mine as well it seems : )18:26
*** thumpba has joined #openstack-swift18:27
*** gyee has quit IRC18:31
*** gyee has joined #openstack-swift18:32
*** thumpba has quit IRC18:32
*** hezhiqiang has quit IRC18:34
notmynamehello, world18:35
* notmyname is sitting in the ops midcycle where ~300 people are talking about tuning hypervisors18:35
notmynamefigured it was a good time to check in on email/IRC ;-)18:36
clayggotta tune those hypervisors18:36
notmynamehurricanerix: thanks for the testr patch18:37
notmynamehogepodge: FYI https://review.openstack.org/#/c/214206/ (from hurricanerix) is our current work on in-tree defcore functional tests18:38
hogepodgenotmyname: ok, thanks. have you worked with izadorozhna at all on this? She's also been looking at it.18:39
notmynamehogepodge: that's a question for hogepodge18:39
notmynamehogepodge: that's a question for hurricanerix18:39
notmyname(tab complete fail)18:39
hogepodgenotmyname: better than my gerrit review assignment fails18:40
hogepodgesslypushenko: ^^18:41
notmynameacoles_: you know some about keystone v3, right? there was a question asked about it a few hours ago at https://ask.openstack.org/en/question/80290/swift-account-head-failed-401-unauthorized-kilo-centos-7/18:46
*** thumpba has joined #openstack-swift18:52
*** wshao has joined #openstack-swift18:56
*** joeljwright has joined #openstack-swift18:58
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v joeljwright18:58
*** gyee has quit IRC19:00
openstackgerritMatthew Oliver proposed openstack/swift: Add concurrent reads option to proxy  https://review.openstack.org/11771019:02
hurricanerixhogepodge: notmyname: No, I was not aware anyone else was looking into it.19:04
*** zaitcev has joined #openstack-swift19:05
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v zaitcev19:05
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-swift19:06
*** kairo has joined #openstack-swift19:06
*** bill_az has quit IRC19:06
*** wshao has quit IRC19:07
*** thumpba has quit IRC19:08
*** esker has joined #openstack-swift19:15
jrichlinotmyname : When acoles_ talked about this in the hackathon, he said "advice: dont include names in ACLs"19:16
jrichlibut not sure if that applies here.19:17
*** thumpba has joined #openstack-swift19:19
clayghrou: ok, I'm probably done with patch 205803 for today19:20
patchbotclayg: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/205803/19:20
hrouThanks clayg  !  I noticed that and I'm looking through it, I never thought about it until you mentioned but I agree about the hidden dir.19:20
*** annegentle has quit IRC19:21
mattoliverauclayg: is just a doc patch to swift one of those patches we can +2/+A with only one +2 (ie. I just merge it)?19:22
mattoliverauI know this has been discussed in the past, and I'm failing at remembering (brain read fail)19:23
*** chsc has quit IRC19:24
claygmattoliverau: I think the reasoning there was more about "formating/typo fixups"19:24
claygmattoliverau: if it's adding a new doc section I think people do the whole review/push-over song and dance until everyone is happy/exahusted19:24
mattoliverauclayg: sounds like a good delimitaion to me, ta19:25
claygmattoliverau: but if someone says "s/your/you're/" we just say "thank you +A, enjoy your foundation sponsered ATC badge"19:25
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-swift19:26
claygi know we talked about it in Austin, but I'm pretty sure we could probably single core +A more stuff than we do - I'm sure it could get out of hand, but I think we're probably also just gun shy19:27
clayg... look torgomatic approved his minor fixup and ... swift was better ... nothing burned down ... oh ... that's probably fine?19:28
claygI'm not advocating either way - I'm just saying it's probably safer to use our own judgement than we give ourselves credit for - but OTOH, when I ask in channel if I can get a minor and import thing merged ASAP it tends to get merged ASAP - so not really a problem that needs fixing19:29
claygok, now i'm just talking to myself19:29
mattoliverausorry, went and grabbed an icecream19:29
claygnom nom19:30
mattoliverauyup, oreo icecream sandwich, thank you very much :)19:30
*** silor has quit IRC19:30
claygnotmyname: random thought of the day - if every swift core maintainer did one review every day - and every review they did resulted in a +2 - how many days would it take to have the entire backlog of reviews merged?19:41
hrounotmyname - jrichli you may be on to something indirectly ; )  re: that keystone issue, as from the looks of that paste keystone was happy to provide a token but it was swift who was complaining, I can emulate if I supply a storage_url to a different account.  That's all I got : )19:41
jrichlimattoliverau: sounds like they are treating you well!  :-)19:43
glangemaybe too well19:44
glange:)19:44
hroumattoliverau, thank you ! : )19:44
glangehe had a food truck pizza and heard a talk about HAM radio also today19:45
jrichliglange: sounds fun.  Nothin's too good for mattoliverau!19:52
mattoliverauglange: I'm living the high life :)19:56
*** annegentle has quit IRC19:57
glangehaha19:57
mattoliveraujrichli: yeah, rackspace office is fun.. and sometimes a little distracting.. at least for me who's used to working from home.19:58
glangeit takes about 10 years, but you get used to it :)19:58
hroumattoliverau, that sounds cool, trying to relate it to the IBM offices here in Canada, recently we started getting ice cream too ! .. once a year ; )19:59
*** izadorozhna has quit IRC19:59
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-swift20:00
mattoliveraulol, well RPC have an icecream fridge that magically restocks.. which will be bad for my figure if I stay more then a week :P20:00
mattoliverauhrou: ^20:00
*** izadorozhna has joined #openstack-swift20:02
*** kevinc___ has joined #openstack-swift20:03
hroumattoliverau, haha !  Ping pong table to work it off maybe ?  Particularly if tdasilva was there for a match : )20:03
*** kevinc_ has quit IRC20:04
tdasilvalol20:04
mattoliveraulol20:05
tdasilvamattoliverau: or just keep going to the shooting range20:07
glangewe used to have a paletta cart that came by a few times a month20:07
mattoliverautdasilva: that's true.. I'm surprised the head office being in Texas doesn't have a range on site :P20:08
tdasilvahaha, now that would be interesting20:08
mattoliverauglange: food trucks 2 days a week is already dangerous enough20:08
*** dbarman1 has joined #openstack-swift20:09
glangethe police used to use our building for training before we moved in20:09
*** petertr7 is now known as petertr7_away20:09
kairoHi. I'm installing OpenStack Kilo in CentOS 7. In the Add Object Storage, on validate part (swift -V3 stat) I'm receiving this error: "Account HEAD failed: http://ctl1srv:8080/v1/AUTH_dc182f2c475846889c7cb68602439d84 401 Unauthorized". I sent a ask on ask.openstack.org, if somebody have some idea to help me. http://bit.ly/1MwkNE1 I put demo-openrc.sh, --debug and my proxy-server.conf there.20:09
tdasilvakairo: notmyname had mentioned your question to acoles_ just a while back. acoles_ is probably the best person to ask this, but i'm afraid he is not around at the moment20:11
claygmattoliverau: did you already do all the fixups for concurrent get's that were disuccsed in austin?20:11
claygmattoliverau: also - can you get dfg to review it?20:11
zaitcevouch, -V 3 is a thing now20:12
claygzaitcev: yeah it's bad - I think v2 is deprecated already for awhile now?20:12
*** silor has joined #openstack-swift20:13
kairotdasilva: thanks you. I'll try talk with acoles_ :)20:13
mattoliverauclayg: yup, no sorting_method anymore. I'll poke him20:13
mattoliverauclayg: damn, forgot to remove the sorting_method from the commit.. new patchset coming.20:14
glangedfg is out this week20:14
glangeunless he checks in for some reason20:14
claygmattoliverau: nm, glange volunteered20:15
hrouclayg, I don't think V2 keystone is depreciated just the keystone cli.20:15
glangehaha20:15
mattoliverauwell, I'll go poke someone in clould files once I've pushed a new commit message.20:16
claygminwoob: so I re-read my comment on patch 196848 and yeah the choices are artificially move a handoff frag to the wrong primary, or make probetests rebalance rings20:16
patchbotclayg: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/196848/20:16
claygminwoob: I guess I'm curious what os.system('remakerings') would do - I feel like if you don't change hash-suffix and stuff that aside from parts all being on the wrong devices it might kinda work20:17
claygminwoob: you can seed the ring building to make partition placement consistent if it's needed - but it already has some constraints about placement and fixed nubers of devices - so it's possible you could get a test that demonstrades the behaviors you want to expose even allowing for some varience in the ring rebalance20:19
claygminwoob: but... it's probably more trouble than it's work :\20:19
clayg*worth20:20
clayg - just move the frag with shutil.move and leave a comment like "imagine you rebalanced and a handoff became a primary - hand wave"20:21
*** zhill_ has quit IRC20:22
peluseclayg, wrt scenario using mixed etags back from the nodes on GET and there aren't enough to build a set and we've exhausted data and parity nodes, do you think we ought to look through all handoffs as well?  I think so but I wasn't doing that before...20:24
clayghrou: well that's good - when you read this it acctually doesn't sound like keystone changes their api nearly as much as we like to pick on http://docs.openstack.org/developer/keystone/http-api.html20:25
minwoobclayg: That sounds like the way to go.20:26
minwoobclayg: Thanks.20:26
claygnotmyname: we've already lost some credibility pikcing on nova, now keystone!?  Before you know it the only openstack projects we'll have left to pick on is what - ceilometer?20:26
*** robefran has quit IRC20:26
*** robefran has joined #openstack-swift20:27
*** zul has joined #openstack-swift20:28
claygpeluse: yeah we should go after handoffs?20:28
claygpeluse: so in a 10+4 you have 14 200's but only 7 from each etag (or 9, 3, 2 or something?)20:29
claygpeluse: we'd keep going if the primary nodes were 404/Timeout - so yeah - i'd say dig deep?20:29
hrouclayg, they talk about it changing it a lot, with words like "on the way too", I think they've decided to depreciate (according to a core) but when exactly is up in the air, not liberty.  I should open up a doc defect for it not to sound so optimistic : )20:30
peluseclayg, I'm not suggesting anything *beyond* handoffs, I'm just making we do want to include them.  So yeah in the case you just mentioned we'd talk to 14 primaries and then like 10 handoffs or something before we punted with 50320:30
peluseclayg, my prev patch didn't do that for whatever reason, I just would look at 14 in that case and be done with it20:31
claygpeluse: that's not so terribly unreasonable - and still better than the current behavior - but yeah going for more is better20:31
pelusecool20:32
pelusethanks20:32
*** robefran has quit IRC20:32
*** zhill has joined #openstack-swift20:32
openstackgerritMatthew Oliver proposed openstack/swift: Add concurrent reads option to proxy  https://review.openstack.org/11771020:33
claygtdasilva: kairo: ho & cschwede & chmouel also know some stuff about v3 & swift20:33
*** ajiang_ has quit IRC20:33
*** bhakta has quit IRC20:33
*** ajiang has joined #openstack-swift20:34
claygtimburke: is it probably acorwin or zackmdavis on our end that has the most experience with keystone?  I think swifterdarrell recently did up-reved everything and v3 like worked?  ish?20:34
*** bhakta has joined #openstack-swift20:34
*** lpabon has quit IRC20:35
timburkeclayg: more likely hugokuo. i know a bit, but i have no idea on the state of v3 integration20:36
claygkairo: apparently it's not possible to both 1) be awake during North American business hours and also 2) know anything about keystone v320:37
claygkairo: not sure why that's the case - someone should do a study20:37
hrouclayg, I used v3 here in my dev env (with storlets among other things) and never had any issues, but I'm not doing anything interesting with ACL or the like.  The one thing I'd suggest is seeing if v2 works, i.e. is v3 really an issue (seemed like the token was being returned just fine).20:37
*** thumpba has quit IRC20:40
*** changbl has quit IRC20:40
tdasilvanotmyname: hi, just came across this: http://www.cloudpro.co.uk/leadership/cloud-essentials/5288/cleversafe-announces-sponsorship-of-openstack-foundation20:42
*** hrou has quit IRC20:43
*** gyee has joined #openstack-swift20:43
*** esker has quit IRC20:47
notmynametdasilva: yeah. isn't that interesting? :-)_20:52
*** cdelatte has quit IRC20:57
*** dustins has quit IRC20:57
*** zul has quit IRC21:00
*** silor has quit IRC21:02
*** ccavanna has quit IRC21:03
*** dbarman1 has quit IRC21:15
*** robefran has joined #openstack-swift21:16
*** zul has joined #openstack-swift21:22
*** lpabon has joined #openstack-swift21:36
*** zhill has quit IRC21:40
*** lpabon has quit IRC21:41
*** sileht has quit IRC21:43
*** zhill has joined #openstack-swift21:44
*** zul has quit IRC21:49
*** hrou has joined #openstack-swift21:57
claygtdasilva: notmyname: yay kinetic!21:57
*** zhill has quit IRC21:58
*** zhill has joined #openstack-swift22:00
zaitcevWhat is Cleversafe famous for, anyway?22:02
*** NM has quit IRC22:05
*** gyee has quit IRC22:06
*** jrichli has quit IRC22:14
*** annegentle has quit IRC22:17
pelusezaitcev, EC :)22:19
zaitcevOh, wait. The patent troll people.22:20
pelusezaitcev, no that was a different group of bozos... these guys are for real22:20
zaitcevyeah, StreamScale, CleverSafe, how do you even tell tham apart22:22
peluseheh :)22:25
*** jlhinson has quit IRC22:34
*** darrenc is now known as darrenc_afk22:40
*** ho has joined #openstack-swift22:42
hogood morning!22:45
openstackgerritBill Huber proposed openstack/swift: Add unit test for container_update for unmounted device  https://review.openstack.org/21061022:46
egonwow.. interesting, given that cleversafe doesn't even offer a swift compatible product right now.22:46
egonand doesn't auth against keystone22:47
torgomatickeystone, shmeestone; swift's got pluggable auth systems ;)22:47
*** dbarman1 has joined #openstack-swift22:51
*** minwoob has quit IRC22:52
*** zhill has quit IRC22:54
*** darrenc_afk is now known as darrenc22:56
*** km has joined #openstack-swift23:00
notmynameegon: or contribute to swift ;-)23:03
claygnotmyname: well the press reelase says they're going to contribute their java reference implemenation - so we have that too look forward to23:06
notmynameand their python one too! ;-)23:07
claygIt's fine - Foundation gets money - cleversafe gets press - everyone's happy23:07
notmynameso, in general, I'd welcome anyone to contribute to swift. get involved in IRC. do reviews. contribute patches. look at high priority stuff. and if cleversafe wants to do that, great!23:08
notmynamelet's see what happens :-)23:08
claygi'm happy!  go team object storage wins woo hoo yay!23:08
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-swift23:08
notmyname:-)23:08
*** joeljwright has quit IRC23:09
*** annegentle has quit IRC23:09
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-swift23:10
egonnotmyname: yes, well, time will tell.23:12
egonbased on the deployments I've seen, I'm not holding my breath.23:12
*** gyee has joined #openstack-swift23:15
*** kei_yama has joined #openstack-swift23:17
hokairo: I read your log. head account requires operator_roles and you configured it with _member_. basically it works. points in this situation is  a project-id of an user who got the token is corresponding to dc182f2c475846889c7cb68602439d84. please check it.23:25
*** wbhuber has quit IRC23:26
*** lcurtis has quit IRC23:26
*** chlong has quit IRC23:29
kairoho: | dc182f2c475846889c7cb68602439d84 | demo              |23:30
hokairo: thanks! does demo have __member__ role?23:31
*** changbl has joined #openstack-swift23:31
hokairo: or admin23:32
openstackgerritpaul luse proposed openstack/swift: EC GET path: require fragments to be of same set  https://review.openstack.org/21218723:32
kairoho: thanks. I've role lists (openstack role list) _member_, admin and user.23:36
hokairo: you use demo project and demo user who mapped to the project right? I think your case fits to https://github.com/openstack/swift/blob/stable/kilo/swift/common/middleware/keystoneauth.py#L488 . can you turn on debug in proxy-server.log?23:45
kairoho: yes I can.23:49
*** hezhiqiang has joined #openstack-swift23:56

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!