Tuesday, 2014-04-08

*** jergerber has joined #openstack-swift00:09
*** jergerber has quit IRC00:09
*** joeljwright has joined #openstack-swift00:11
*** shri has left #openstack-swift00:12
*** joeljwright has quit IRC00:15
*** mmcardle has joined #openstack-swift00:19
*** ChanServ changes topic to "All of the project infrastructure hosts are being restarted for security updates."00:22
*** mmcardle has quit IRC00:24
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC00:24
*** nosnos has joined #openstack-swift00:29
*** mwstorer has quit IRC00:45
*** csd has quit IRC00:54
*** gadb has joined #openstack-swift01:00
*** gyee has quit IRC01:01
*** zackf has quit IRC01:08
*** piousbox has quit IRC01:09
*** joeljwright has joined #openstack-swift01:12
*** nosnos has quit IRC01:16
*** joeljwright has quit IRC01:16
*** jeblair has quit IRC01:18
*** mmcardle has joined #openstack-swift01:20
*** jeblair has joined #openstack-swift01:23
*** mmcardle has quit IRC01:25
*** matsuhashi has joined #openstack-swift01:28
nthackerhi All!, So i keep seeing some LockTimeouts in my var/log/syslog from the account server. I narrowed this down the code where it occurs while trying to create a tmp file (most likely a new db file)01:29
nthackerhow do i increase the LockTimeout!01:29
nthackeri tried having a huge timeout in each of the .conf files for the account/proxy/container/object server01:30
nthackerbut they dont seem to apply to the locktimeout01:30
claygnthacker: my reading of AccountController._get_account_broker doesn't seem to look like it's parameterized currently01:32
claygnthacker: you could hack common.db and see if that fixes your issue - there's a literal 10 for the .pending_timeout if it's not passed in (and the account server doesn't pass anything in)01:33
claygnthacker: if that works you could submit a patch to add it to the .conf for the account/container servers01:33
*** ChanServ changes topic to "Current Swift Release: 1.13.1 | Priority Reviews: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Swift/PriorityReviews | Channel Logs: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-swift/"01:33
claygnthacker: maybe a better question is why it takes your account servers more than 10 seconds to create a new empty database?  I'm guessing contention with the object requests...01:34
nthackerclayg: Hi! Thanks ! Im going to try that out and let you know my findings! Sure if that works, maybe I'll propose a patch01:34
nthackerclayg: Yes that might be a good question. however my only clue to this problem01:34
nthackerclayg: is this message01:34
claygrunning your metdata servers on different disks could help, maybe the io scheduler, or more disks/iops to support your workload01:34
nthackerclayg: Apr  7 18:28:01 nt-n1 account-server: ERROR __call__ error with PUT /sdb1/162996/AUTH_system : LockTimeout (0s) /srv/node/sdb1/accounts/162996/d29/9f2d1fd4e6811f8c66e8963fc19d4d29/tmpW0RjyT.tmp (txn: tx76cafa68c06448129c192-005343507d)01:35
clayghrm... that's not a 10 second timeout...01:35
nthackerclayg: right..01:35
*** openstack has joined #openstack-swift01:48
nthackerclayg - im running on a vm cluster that does have some slow IO at times01:50
nthackersince its shared01:50
nthackerits likely that01:50
claygk, maybe01:50
nthackerclayg: I did see what i wanted though! That was the correct place to increase the timeout then. thanks!01:51
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC01:57
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-swift01:58
*** changbl has joined #openstack-swift02:00
*** haomaiw__ has joined #openstack-swift02:06
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC02:09
*** joeljwright has joined #openstack-swift02:14
*** joeljwright has quit IRC02:18
openstackgerritA change was merged to openstack/swift: Handle getting info on wrong database type  https://review.openstack.org/8515602:18
*** mmcardle has joined #openstack-swift02:22
*** mmcardle has quit IRC02:26
*** changbl has quit IRC02:29
*** Guest_ has joined #openstack-swift02:33
openstackgerritClay Gerrard proposed a change to openstack/swift: Merge container storage_policy_index values.  https://review.openstack.org/8394202:34
claygwhy can i only see the "restore change" button my change sets and not anyone I've been commiting to... sheesh02:36
openstackgerritClay Gerrard proposed a change to openstack/swift: Add object-reconciler daemon  https://review.openstack.org/8590802:37
openstackgerritPete Zaitcev proposed a change to openstack/swift: Separate Backend from Broker  https://review.openstack.org/8590902:41
portanteclayg: not sure what you mean?02:43
zaitcev 5 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) -- surely this is easy to review, right guys?02:45
pelusezaitcev:  nice - your first small one in the series was so easy it was merged before I could even look :)03:15
*** joeljwright has joined #openstack-swift03:15
pelusewill check this one out tomrorow for sure03:15
zaitcevactually your 79731 is not that big either, if we ignore the new 300 line test. But I still don't get what it does.03:17
*** joeljwright has quit IRC03:19
peluseyeah that guys gave me some fits - seemed so easy at first :)  clayg bailed me out though note how it started with < 30 LOC changed and ended with like 500...03:21
*** lpabon has joined #openstack-swift03:22
*** mmcardle has joined #openstack-swift03:23
*** changbl has joined #openstack-swift03:24
madhuriclayg: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/84675/03:26
madhuriI think this change can't be merged03:26
notmynamemadhuri: looks like it needs to be rebased and resubmitted03:28
*** mmcardle has quit IRC03:28
notmynamemadhuri: are you comfortable with doing that?03:28
madhuriyes03:28
*** matsuhashi has quit IRC03:29
madhuribut i think the same change has already been merged in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/84456/03:29
notmynamemadhuri: ah, yes03:30
notmynamemadhuri: so your's should be abandoned then03:30
madhurinotmyname: yeah :(03:31
portantemadhuri: are you sure?03:31
* notmyname is currently getting back to the swiftqa cluster and upgrading it in light of today's "fun"03:32
portanteautomating the whole process as you go, too, huh? ;)03:32
madhuriportante: Yes03:32
portantemadhuri: I see what you meant about the args parameter, after the parse, it is everything left on command line that is not a --param or --param value03:33
madhuriportante: so is it making sense then?03:37
madhuriportante: Should I abandon this change?03:40
portantethe change to use != 1 I can see, for sure, though that is already in the master as of 8445603:41
portantewhat are the other changes that you want to make?03:41
portanteIs it hard to rebase that change against master?03:41
madhuriUse of some request_helpers method like is_user_meta, strip_user_meta_prefix, is_sys_meta, strip_sys_meta_prefix03:44
madhuribut it's also there in master 8445603:44
*** chandan_kumar has quit IRC03:44
openstackgerritYuan Zhou proposed a change to openstack/swift: Fixes versioning function tests with non-zero default policy  https://review.openstack.org/8251503:45
openstackgerritA change was merged to openstack/swift: Move Storage Policy validation from parser to class  https://review.openstack.org/8325203:48
*** chandan_kumar has joined #openstack-swift03:50
*** chandan_kumar has quit IRC03:56
notmynamepeluse: clayg: I've got a merge issue on the ec branch04:11
*** chandan_kumar has joined #openstack-swift04:14
*** joeljwright has joined #openstack-swift04:16
*** ppai has joined #openstack-swift04:18
*** haomaiwa_ has joined #openstack-swift04:19
*** matsuhashi has joined #openstack-swift04:19
*** haomaiw__ has quit IRC04:20
*** joeljwright has quit IRC04:20
*** clarkb has quit IRC04:22
*** mmcardle has joined #openstack-swift04:24
openstackgerritJohn Dickinson proposed a change to openstack/swift: merge master to EC branch  https://review.openstack.org/8591904:29
*** mmcardle has quit IRC04:30
*** zaitcev has quit IRC04:53
*** Guest_ has quit IRC05:03
*** Guest_ has joined #openstack-swift05:04
*** zhiyan_ is now known as zhiyan05:09
*** joeljwright has joined #openstack-swift05:17
*** lpabon has quit IRC05:19
*** RockKuo has joined #openstack-swift05:20
*** joeljwright has quit IRC05:22
*** mmcardle has joined #openstack-swift05:26
*** saju_m has joined #openstack-swift05:28
*** zackf has joined #openstack-swift05:29
*** mmcardle has quit IRC05:30
*** zackf has quit IRC05:33
*** nshaikh has joined #openstack-swift05:51
*** joeljwright has joined #openstack-swift06:18
*** joeljwright has quit IRC06:22
*** mmcardle has joined #openstack-swift06:28
*** Guest_ has quit IRC06:28
*** mmcardle has quit IRC06:32
*** ashish_ has joined #openstack-swift07:05
*** cheri has joined #openstack-swift07:06
*** psharma has joined #openstack-swift07:08
*** saju_m has quit IRC07:17
*** joeljwright has joined #openstack-swift07:19
*** ashish_ has quit IRC07:20
*** mmcardle has joined #openstack-swift07:22
*** joeljwright has quit IRC07:23
*** mlipchuk has joined #openstack-swift07:23
*** saju_m has joined #openstack-swift07:25
*** sungju has quit IRC07:30
*** sungju has joined #openstack-swift07:31
*** saju_m has quit IRC07:32
*** ashish_ has joined #openstack-swift07:42
*** matsuhashi has quit IRC07:53
*** matsuhashi has joined #openstack-swift07:54
*** saju_m has joined #openstack-swift07:58
*** saju_m has quit IRC08:03
*** saschpe has joined #openstack-swift08:04
*** joeljwright has joined #openstack-swift08:09
*** joeljwright has quit IRC08:10
*** jamie_h has joined #openstack-swift08:13
*** saju_m has joined #openstack-swift08:15
*** chandan_kumar has quit IRC08:15
*** d89 has joined #openstack-swift08:21
*** ashish_ has quit IRC08:26
*** nprivalova has quit IRC08:29
openstackgerritYuan Zhou proposed a change to openstack/swift: Update policy_stat table when auditing account DB  https://review.openstack.org/8595208:52
*** tanee-away is now known as tanee09:06
*** gadb has quit IRC09:14
*** nshaikh has quit IRC09:30
*** d89 has quit IRC09:39
*** saju_m has quit IRC09:39
*** saschpe has quit IRC09:39
*** matsuhashi has quit IRC09:39
*** RockKuo has quit IRC09:39
*** zackmdavis has quit IRC09:39
*** mlanner has quit IRC09:39
*** ctennis has quit IRC09:39
*** acorwin has quit IRC09:39
*** russellb has quit IRC09:39
*** mhu has quit IRC09:39
*** zul has quit IRC09:39
*** bada has quit IRC09:39
*** annegentle_ has quit IRC09:39
*** serverascode has quit IRC09:39
*** rturk-aw` has quit IRC09:39
*** yuan has quit IRC09:39
*** grapsus__ has quit IRC09:39
*** EmilienM has quit IRC09:39
*** jokke_ has quit IRC09:39
*** gholt has quit IRC09:39
*** pandemicsyn has quit IRC09:39
*** dosaboy has quit IRC09:39
*** tristanC has quit IRC09:39
*** bada has joined #openstack-swift09:39
*** serverascode has joined #openstack-swift09:39
*** yuan has joined #openstack-swift09:39
*** d89 has joined #openstack-swift09:39
*** saju_m has joined #openstack-swift09:39
*** RockKuo has joined #openstack-swift09:39
*** serverascode has quit IRC09:39
*** serverascode has joined #openstack-swift09:39
*** zul has joined #openstack-swift09:39
*** matsuhashi has joined #openstack-swift09:39
*** EmilienM has joined #openstack-swift09:39
*** d89 has quit IRC09:39
*** d89 has joined #openstack-swift09:39
*** yuan has quit IRC09:39
*** bada has quit IRC09:39
*** ppai has quit IRC09:39
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC09:39
*** swifterdarrell has quit IRC09:39
*** zhiyan has quit IRC09:39
*** dfg has quit IRC09:39
*** cschwede has quit IRC09:39
*** sfineberg has quit IRC09:39
*** fifieldt has quit IRC09:39
*** openstack has joined #openstack-swift09:50
*** redbo has joined #openstack-swift09:52
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v redbo09:52
*** mlanner has joined #openstack-swift09:52
*** wayneeseguin has joined #openstack-swift09:52
*** matsuhashi has quit IRC09:52
*** matsuhashi has joined #openstack-swift09:53
*** grapsus_ has joined #openstack-swift09:54
*** ppai has quit IRC09:56
*** ppai has joined #openstack-swift09:56
*** serverascode has quit IRC09:57
*** serverascode has joined #openstack-swift09:57
*** mkerrin has quit IRC09:57
*** mkerrin has joined #openstack-swift09:57
*** dfg has joined #openstack-swift10:00
*** jokke_ has joined #openstack-swift10:00
*** serverascode has quit IRC10:03
*** sileht has quit IRC10:03
*** zigo has quit IRC10:03
*** StevenK has quit IRC10:03
*** briancline has quit IRC10:03
*** torgomatic has quit IRC10:03
*** CrackerJackMack has quit IRC10:03
*** wer has quit IRC10:03
*** sudorandom has quit IRC10:03
*** StevenK has joined #openstack-swift10:03
*** torgomatic has joined #openstack-swift10:03
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v torgomatic10:03
*** zhiyan is now known as zhiyan_10:03
*** briancline has joined #openstack-swift10:04
*** serverascode has joined #openstack-swift10:04
*** sileht has joined #openstack-swift10:04
*** zigo has joined #openstack-swift10:04
*** annegentle has quit IRC10:13
*** serverascode has quit IRC10:13
*** serverascode has joined #openstack-swift10:13
*** ctennis has quit IRC10:14
*** ctennis has joined #openstack-swift10:14
*** StevenK has quit IRC10:15
*** wkelly has quit IRC10:15
*** mhu has quit IRC10:15
*** russellb has quit IRC10:15
*** pandemicsyn has quit IRC10:15
*** EmilienM has quit IRC10:15
*** StevenK has joined #openstack-swift10:16
*** sudorandom has joined #openstack-swift10:17
*** gholt has quit IRC10:17
*** wkelly has joined #openstack-swift10:19
*** CrackerJackMack has joined #openstack-swift10:19
*** EmilienM has joined #openstack-swift10:22
*** dmsimard has quit IRC10:26
*** minnear has quit IRC10:26
*** jamie_h has quit IRC10:26
*** creiht has quit IRC10:26
*** sfineberg has quit IRC10:26
*** zhiyan_ has quit IRC10:26
*** fifieldt has quit IRC10:26
*** cheri has quit IRC10:26
*** haomaiwa_ has quit IRC10:26
*** acoles has quit IRC10:26
*** mtreinish has quit IRC10:26
*** ryao has quit IRC10:26
*** glange has quit IRC10:26
*** ondergetekende has quit IRC10:26
*** creiht has joined #openstack-swift10:27
*** glange has joined #openstack-swift10:27
*** sfineberg has joined #openstack-swift10:27
*** mtreinish has joined #openstack-swift10:27
*** dmsimard has joined #openstack-swift10:27
*** haomaiwa_ has joined #openstack-swift10:27
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v creiht10:27
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v glange10:27
*** jamie_h has joined #openstack-swift10:27
*** ryao has joined #openstack-swift10:27
*** minnear has joined #openstack-swift10:27
*** _bluev has joined #openstack-swift10:28
*** zhiyan_ has joined #openstack-swift10:28
*** fifieldt has joined #openstack-swift10:29
*** cheri has joined #openstack-swift10:29
*** ondergetekende has joined #openstack-swift10:31
*** acoles has joined #openstack-swift10:31
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v acoles10:31
*** saju_m has quit IRC10:34
*** saju_m has joined #openstack-swift10:35
*** jokke_ has quit IRC10:39
*** acorwin has quit IRC10:39
*** amandap has quit IRC10:39
*** tanee has quit IRC10:39
*** Dieterbe has quit IRC10:39
*** ppai has quit IRC10:39
*** mmcardle has quit IRC10:39
*** psharma has quit IRC10:39
*** joearnold has quit IRC10:39
*** Dieterbe_ has joined #openstack-swift10:39
*** joearnold_ has joined #openstack-swift10:39
*** tanee has joined #openstack-swift10:40
*** mmcardle has joined #openstack-swift10:40
*** ppai has joined #openstack-swift10:40
*** psharma has joined #openstack-swift10:40
*** joearnold_ is now known as joearnold10:40
*** acorwin has joined #openstack-swift10:40
*** jokke_ has joined #openstack-swift10:40
*** psharma has quit IRC10:40
*** psharma has joined #openstack-swift10:40
*** amandap has joined #openstack-swift10:40
*** matsuhashi has quit IRC10:53
*** matsuhashi has joined #openstack-swift10:54
*** matsuhashi has quit IRC10:58
*** matsuhashi has joined #openstack-swift10:59
*** chandan_kumar has joined #openstack-swift11:03
*** Trixboxer has joined #openstack-swift11:05
*** RockKuo has quit IRC11:28
*** mkollaro has joined #openstack-swift11:29
*** mmcardle has quit IRC11:43
*** chandan_kumar has quit IRC11:44
*** mhu has joined #openstack-swift11:44
*** pandemicsyn has joined #openstack-swift11:44
*** gholt has joined #openstack-swift11:46
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v gholt11:46
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-swift11:46
*** russellb has joined #openstack-swift11:46
*** fifieldt has quit IRC11:52
*** chandan_kumar has joined #openstack-swift12:01
*** mkollaro1 has joined #openstack-swift12:06
*** mkollaro has quit IRC12:06
*** ppai has quit IRC12:08
*** mkollaro1 has quit IRC12:13
*** JuanManuelOlle has joined #openstack-swift12:14
*** CrackerJackMack has quit IRC12:16
*** serverascode has quit IRC12:16
*** serverascode has joined #openstack-swift12:16
*** annegentle has quit IRC12:17
*** gholt has quit IRC12:17
*** zigo has quit IRC12:17
*** pandemicsyn has quit IRC12:17
*** matsuhashi has quit IRC12:18
*** zigo has joined #openstack-swift12:18
*** mhu has quit IRC12:18
*** russellb has quit IRC12:18
*** matsuhashi has joined #openstack-swift12:18
*** wkelly has quit IRC12:18
*** sudorandom has quit IRC12:18
*** StevenK has quit IRC12:19
*** sileht has quit IRC12:19
*** matsuhashi has quit IRC12:19
*** matsuhashi has joined #openstack-swift12:19
*** StevenK has joined #openstack-swift12:20
*** cheri has quit IRC12:20
*** mhu has joined #openstack-swift12:20
*** pandemicsyn has joined #openstack-swift12:20
*** wkelly has joined #openstack-swift12:21
*** gholt has joined #openstack-swift12:21
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v gholt12:21
*** sudorandom has joined #openstack-swift12:21
*** CrackerJackMack has joined #openstack-swift12:21
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-swift12:21
*** russellb has joined #openstack-swift12:21
*** sileht has joined #openstack-swift12:22
*** zhiyan_ is now known as zhiyan12:27
*** mmcardle has joined #openstack-swift12:30
*** matsuhashi has quit IRC12:30
*** mkollaro has joined #openstack-swift12:31
*** changbl has quit IRC12:32
portanteacoles: now I can use that /info patch to have the functional tests just grab /info12:32
portantethanks12:33
acolesportante: thats was the idea, tiny step towards func tests running against deployed constraints12:33
portantegreat12:34
*** ashish_ has joined #openstack-swift12:44
*** mkollaro has quit IRC12:47
*** mkollaro1 has joined #openstack-swift12:47
*** praveenkumar has joined #openstack-swift12:48
praveenkumarIs complete object move to memory when we create/update/delete a object metadata because I am using python-swiftclient to check object creation and metadata operation so when any metadata operation occur, I can see memory usage drastically change?12:52
*** fifieldt has joined #openstack-swift12:57
*** tdasilva has joined #openstack-swift13:00
*** nshaikh has joined #openstack-swift13:10
*** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-swift13:23
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC13:23
*** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-swift13:24
*** fbo is now known as fbo_away13:27
*** gholt has quit IRC13:34
*** gholt has joined #openstack-swift13:35
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v gholt13:35
*** nacim has joined #openstack-swift13:42
ashish_Hey Everyone in the "swift-ring-builder <builder_file> create <part_power> <replicas> <min_part_hours>" could anyone tell me the what wouldbe the name of the builder_file here.13:45
glangeashish_: maybe you can name it what you want, but I've seen account.builder, container.builder, object.builder13:47
glangeashish_: and that is what it is on a swift all in one13:48
ashish_okay Glance thanks.Actually I want to change the number of replicas from 3 to 2.How can that be done.13:53
ashish_glance  Glance thanks.Actually I want to change the number of replicas from 3 to 2.How can that be done.13:54
portanteso is that were glance got its name, glange? ;)13:54
portanteI have always wondered about that name ... :)13:54
glangehaha13:54
glangeashish_: I don't know, I've always seen swift run at 3 replicas, hang out on channel and somebody will probably answer you later when they wake up13:55
ashish_glance thanks.I'll wait.13:56
glangeI don't know what would happen if you take a 3 replica ring and then run the ring builder with 2 replicas specified13:56
*** _bluev1 has joined #openstack-swift13:56
glangeno problem, a_hash13:56
*** _bluev has quit IRC13:57
ashish_glance I think after specifying the nos of rings we need to run the rebalance cmd that would change the nos of replicas from three to two.13:58
glangeyou could do an experiment on a copy of your ring file and see what it does14:00
glangeit wouldn't hurt14:00
glangeand I'd learn something :)14:00
ashish_I am trying that.Would let you know14:01
glangecool14:01
glangejust keep a copy in case!14:01
*** nacim has quit IRC14:02
ashish_I have a copy of my VM>No issue with that.14:03
*** jergerber has joined #openstack-swift14:08
*** nacim has joined #openstack-swift14:10
*** chandan_kumar has quit IRC14:16
*** psharma has quit IRC14:18
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v dfg14:28
*** SkyRocknRoll__ has joined #openstack-swift14:40
cschwedeacoles: portante: about this: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/86015/ - do we need a comment in swift.common.constraints that all default values are automatically added to /info?14:40
cschwedeacoles: portante: that said i like the patch :)14:40
*** saju_m has quit IRC14:41
portantecschwede: certainly could not hurt, acoles?14:41
acolescschwede: thats a great idea. I did have a slight concern about unexpected consequence of adding to default constraints14:41
cschwedeportante, acoles: ok, wait a sec14:42
acolescschwede: portante: will fix that14:42
cschwedeacoles: i wanted to fix that and approve your patch ;-)14:42
cschwedeacoles: since i’m adding another patch for default constraints :)14:42
acolescschwede: go ahead :)14:42
*** IRTermite has quit IRC14:45
*** bsdkurt has quit IRC14:45
*** mkerrin has quit IRC14:45
*** rturk-away has quit IRC14:45
*** cschwede has quit IRC14:45
*** akscram has quit IRC14:45
*** ctennis has quit IRC14:45
*** dosaboy has quit IRC14:45
*** d89 has quit IRC14:45
*** sungju has quit IRC14:45
*** jeblair has quit IRC14:45
*** otherjon has quit IRC14:45
*** alpha_ori has quit IRC14:45
*** Anticimex has quit IRC14:45
*** patchbot has quit IRC14:45
*** mordred has quit IRC14:45
*** ccorrigan has quit IRC14:45
*** taras_ has quit IRC14:45
*** SpamapS has quit IRC14:45
*** taras_ has joined #openstack-swift14:49
*** ccorrigan has joined #openstack-swift14:49
*** dosaboy has joined #openstack-swift14:49
*** akscram has joined #openstack-swift14:49
*** cschwede has joined #openstack-swift14:49
*** ccorrigan has quit IRC14:49
*** ccorrigan has joined #openstack-swift14:49
*** rturk-away has joined #openstack-swift14:49
*** alpha_ori has joined #openstack-swift14:49
*** IRTermite has joined #openstack-swift14:49
*** d89 has joined #openstack-swift14:49
*** otherjon has joined #openstack-swift14:49
*** ctennis has joined #openstack-swift14:49
*** Anticimex has joined #openstack-swift14:49
*** patchbot has joined #openstack-swift14:50
*** bsdkurt has joined #openstack-swift14:50
*** SpamapS has joined #openstack-swift14:50
*** jeblair has joined #openstack-swift14:50
*** piyush has joined #openstack-swift14:51
*** mordred has joined #openstack-swift14:52
ashish_cschwede Could you tell me how to change the number of replicas from 3 to 2.I got the following result when I tried. http://paste.openstack.org/show/75331/14:53
*** jokke_ has quit IRC14:53
*** mkerrin has joined #openstack-swift14:55
ashish_ Could anyone tell me how to change the number of replicas from 3 to 2.I got the following result when I tried. http://paste.openstack.org/show/75331/14:56
notmynameashish_: https://gist.github.com/notmyname/d8251832ebc7b2c6addf14:56
cschwedeashish_: the correct command is swift-ring-builder object.builder set_replicas 214:56
cschwedeashish_: and there is a directory backups/ where your old object.builder file is stored14:57
cschwedenotmyname: :)14:57
*** tdasilva has quit IRC14:58
*** jokke_ has joined #openstack-swift14:58
cschwedeacoles: I’m no longer sure about my patch, it might reveal too much infos. After all it’s probably better to add the note in your patch - what do you think?14:59
acolescschwede: ok i'll do that15:00
cschwedeacoles: nice, thanks!15:00
ashish_csshwede thanks15:02
*** tdasilva has joined #openstack-swift15:02
*** zaitcev has joined #openstack-swift15:03
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v zaitcev15:03
*** tanee is now known as tanee-away15:04
notmynamecschwede: acoles: what's the discussion?15:06
acolesnotmyname: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/86015/ makes /info include exactly what is in constraints.EFFECTIVE_CONSTRAINTS15:07
notmynameacoles: which looks good, in general. I'm looking at it now15:08
cschwedenotmyname: yep, looks good - we were just discussing that there should be a note in swift.common.constraints that these are automatically exposed in /info15:08
acolesnotmyname: cschwede suggested making that clear with a comment. which is a good idea.15:08
notmynameacoles: only idea I have is to add some brittleness to https://review.openstack.org/#/c/86015/1/test/unit/proxy/test_server.py so that we actually know when something is added. ie test that there aren't other things that aren't tested there15:09
cschwedeacoles: notmyname: a simple self.assertEqual(len(si), 11) should do the trick?15:10
acolesnotmyname: good idea too. i'll look at that.15:10
notmynameacoles: cschwede: a comment in constraints.py would be fine, I guess. a test would help show that too. if you want a comment, it should probably also be in swift.conf-sample15:11
notmynamecschwede: ya, that should be fine. even if a name were changed (and the number stays at 11) it would still be caught by one of the existing tests15:12
notmynamebasically, change the test so that it breaks when  utils.get_swift_info()['swift'] is changed15:13
ashish_notmyname thanks.It helps15:13
notmynamekinda like how the handoff tests are brittle in that the tests will break if the handoff logic changes in any way15:14
acolescschwede: notmyname : ok. may need to be 12 though :) (version is in there)15:14
ashish_csschwede using the object.buider in the backup directory can I recover my devices and zones15:14
cschwedeacoles: got me!15:15
cschwedeashish_: yes, that should work15:15
acolescschwede: 13! (strict_cors_mode)15:17
ashish_csschwede do I need to place the object.builder file from the backup directory in my  my etc/swift directory.Do I need to rebalance?15:17
*** zackf has joined #openstack-swift15:18
*** Gu_______ has joined #openstack-swift15:18
acolesnotmyname: re swift.conf-sample - making changes in there doesn't change the set of constraints reported in info (just the values potentially).15:18
cschwedeacoles: oh, yes. maybe you can add a comment in test_server.py, because otherwise it will not be clear why its 13?15:19
cschwedeashish_: you have to do a rebalance first and after that you copy the created object.ring.gz to /etc/swift15:20
notmynameacoles: right. different audiences. constraints.py will be seen by swift contributors (ie if you change this value, it will be reflected in the keys in /info). swift.conf is for deployers (the values you set here will shown in /info responses)15:20
acolesnotmyname: happy to replicate comment there but, yes, heads-up is really for any dev adding to default constaints dict.15:21
ashish_cschwede thanks.Just give me a minute15:21
notmynameacoles: I totally agree. add the comment :-)15:21
*** changbl has joined #openstack-swift15:23
ashish_cschwede do I need to delete the object.ring.gz already inside the swift directory before placing tha backup.15:24
cschwedeashish_: no, but normally I keep the file somewhere just in case15:26
*** Gu_______ has quit IRC15:27
*** Canaimero-9b71 has joined #openstack-swift15:27
Canaimero-9b71hello15:28
*** Canaimero-9b71 has left #openstack-swift15:28
ashish_cschwede Thanks.I still could not recover my zones and devices. http://paste.openstack.org/show/75336/15:31
cschwedeashish_: you need to copy 1396001161.object.builder to object.builder15:31
*** gyee has joined #openstack-swift15:32
ashish_Thanks csshwede.I will try.Please give me a minute15:33
*** nacim has quit IRC15:36
ashish_Do I need to delete the existing text inside the object.builder file15:37
ashish_cschwede Do I need to delete the existing text inside the object.builder file15:37
*** mwstorer has joined #openstack-swift15:38
cschwedeashish_: you don’t need to change anything in the builder file if you only copy 1396001161.object.builder to object.builder15:38
cschwedeashish_: that said you should not change any of the builder files manually, only with swift-ring-builder15:39
*** wer has joined #openstack-swift15:41
*** judd7 has joined #openstack-swift15:42
*** bvandenh has joined #openstack-swift15:44
*** Gu_______ has joined #openstack-swift15:46
dmsimardThis is probably basic but I can't seem to find documentation on wether or not it is possible to provide alternative names for swift regions ?15:46
notmynamedmsimard: alternative == not "r1"?15:47
dmsimardnotmyname: yeah, for instance "ny01"15:47
dmsimardContext is I'd like to see if it would be possible to match my swift region names with my openstack regions.15:48
notmynamedmsimard: I think that's possible15:48
dmsimardnotmyname: Me too ! Can't find how, however. Closest I've seen is Swiftstack's implementation through their interface but it could very well be a label on top of r1, r2, etc.15:49
notmynamedmsimard: heh. no, we actually don't use swift-ring-builder :-)15:49
*** Gu_______ has quit IRC15:50
dmsimardblasphemy.15:50
dmsimard:P15:50
*** Guest____ has joined #openstack-swift15:53
notmynamedmsimard: I've got abotu 4 conversations going right now. looking into swift-ring-builder for you now :-)15:57
torgomaticdmsimard: regions are just numbers, as are zones15:58
dmsimardnotmyname: Far from being an emergency, thanks for looking into it :)15:58
notmynamedmsimard: so what if you use the option flag (--region <region>) instead of the DSL?15:58
torgomaticnon-negative numbers at that :)15:58
notmynamedmsimard: and a wild torgomatic apears to answer the question!15:58
dmsimardtorgomatic: Are you positive ?15:58
dmsimardtorgomatic: (no pun intended :P)15:59
notmynamedmsimard: torgomatic wrote it :-)15:59
torgomaticdmsimard: yup, I can see the code here, and it's definitely int()-ing stuff16:00
dmsimardnotmyname: Oh god, shame on me16:00
notmynamealso, the swift-ring-builder should die in a fire, IMO16:00
notmynameerr... swift-ring-builder DSL16:00
portantenotmyname: ... only to rise like Dark Phoenix?16:00
dmsimardnotmyname: What other options is there ? I'm obviously still not extremely knowledgeable :(16:01
torgomaticnotmyname: oh, the r1z2-1.2.3.4/blah:blah%wtf_ohgodwhy format?16:01
notmynameya16:01
torgomaticyeah, I can never remember where the slashes and colons and capital Rs and such go16:01
notmynamedmsimard: there are actual option flags for them. instead of the format torgomatic mentioned, you can do stuff like --region r116:02
torgomaticwe've got long options, like --region and --zone and such; I usually stand a chance of remembering those16:02
dmsimardright16:02
dmsimardHmm, I wanted to keep a sane relationship between our openstack and swift region names, guess i'll have to do it some other way16:03
*** nacim has joined #openstack-swift16:04
notmynametorgomatic: so I know we aren't using swift-ring-builder at swiftstack. but is it just aliased in the controller DB? ie "Region Awesome" is mapped to r1 and "Region Pretty Good" is r2?16:04
torgomaticnotmyname: yeah, there's a Region model in the Django app that's got a name (string) and a number (int), plus extra logic16:05
notmynamedmsimard: ^^ that :-)16:05
torgomaticthe builder files don't really have region (or zone) as a top-level thing; there's a list of devices, and each one has a 'region' (and 'zone') attribute16:06
notmynameportante: waiting on some more input for merging https://review.openstack.org/#/c/83237/ ?16:07
torgomaticand the regions in the builder file are simply the set of all 'region' attributes on the devices16:07
portantenotmyname: okay, thanks16:07
torgomaticwhich means there's not really an easy place to hang a pretty name for a region16:07
notmynameportante: sorry. are you waiting for more input?16:08
portanteI am working on a dependent patch set that creates a common server base to handle the __call__ semantics and basic init16:08
portanteoh, did I fail to check approved?16:08
portanteah, yes I did16:08
portantenotmyname: thanks16:09
notmynamehttps://451research.com/report-short?entityId=80813 <-- "HP realigns object storage strategy around OpenStack Swift"16:11
*** mlipchuk has quit IRC16:14
notmynamewow. just got this in an email (summarized): "I'm from China. I want to know more about Swift. I saw some links to some videos, but I can't watch YouTube in China. Do you have other links?"16:15
*** ChanServ sets mode: -b Longgeek_!*@*16:15
ashish_cschwede Thanks a lot.That helps.16:16
*** ashish_ has quit IRC16:16
*** krtaylor has quit IRC16:21
*** tanee-away has quit IRC16:23
*** ashish_ has joined #openstack-swift16:30
*** jamie_h has quit IRC16:31
*** saju_m has joined #openstack-swift16:34
*** krtaylor has joined #openstack-swift16:39
*** Guest____ has quit IRC16:41
*** peluse_ has joined #openstack-swift16:43
ashish_csshwede after I used the set_replicas 2 cmd and rebalanced it.The cmds executed successfully.But still there are replicas of my objects.What should I do.Please help.16:44
*** SkyRocknRoll__ has quit IRC16:48
*** nacim has quit IRC16:51
*** peluse_ has quit IRC16:54
*** peluse_ has joined #openstack-swift16:55
*** fifieldt has quit IRC17:05
*** mkollaro1 has quit IRC17:05
*** shri has joined #openstack-swift17:07
*** bvandenh has quit IRC17:12
*** Diddi has joined #openstack-swift17:13
*** mmcardle has quit IRC17:14
*** piyush has quit IRC17:16
*** tanee has joined #openstack-swift17:19
openstackgerritJohn Dickinson proposed a change to openstack/swift: merge master to EC branch  https://review.openstack.org/8591917:21
*** tanee is now known as tanee-away17:23
tdasilvaHello, I've setup two saio VMs, one on ubuntu and another on Fedora 19. While running unit tests, I'm seeing one test fail on the F19, but not on ubuntu: common.test_internal_client:TestSimpleClient.test_get_with_retries. Has anybody run into an issue like this before?17:28
openstackgerritJohn Dickinson proposed a change to openstack/swift: update setup.py with pbr version  https://review.openstack.org/8610117:28
portantetdasilva: what is the failure mode?17:28
tdasilvaself.assertEqual(request.call_count, 3)17:29
tdasilvaAssertionError: 2 != 317:29
portante"python setup.py develop" performed on each tree?17:30
tdasilvayes17:30
tdasilvabtw: functest and probe tests run ok17:31
*** tanee-away is now known as tanee17:32
tdasilvalast night i was running the debugger and noticed that the first request doesn't seem to raise the error17:33
portanteyou might want to try using pdb and stepping through the code17:33
tdasilvarequest.side_effect = [urllib2.URLError(''), req]17:33
tdasilvatrying again17:33
portantehmmm17:33
tdasilvajust wanted to check if anybody had run into this before digging deeper17:34
*** d89 has quit IRC17:34
*** tanee has quit IRC17:40
*** tanee has joined #openstack-swift17:42
*** fbo_away has quit IRC17:42
*** fbo has joined #openstack-swift17:43
*** piyush has joined #openstack-swift17:44
openstackgerritpaul luse proposed a change to openstack/swift: Container Confict on obj update with wrong Storage-Policy-Index  https://review.openstack.org/7973117:45
*** j_king has quit IRC17:46
*** j_king has joined #openstack-swift17:46
*** piyush1 has joined #openstack-swift17:48
*** tanee is now known as tanee-away17:48
*** tanee-away has quit IRC17:50
*** piyush has quit IRC17:50
*** peluse_ has quit IRC17:55
openstackgerritA change was merged to openstack/swift: Unify backend logging  https://review.openstack.org/8323717:56
*** tanee has joined #openstack-swift18:01
openstackgerritPeter Portante proposed a change to openstack/swift: WIP: ABC for Storage Servers  https://review.openstack.org/8610918:04
openstackgerritPeter Portante proposed a change to openstack/swift: WIP: ABC for Storage Servers  https://review.openstack.org/8610918:07
*** mkollaro has joined #openstack-swift18:13
*** _bluev1 has quit IRC18:19
*** nshaikh has quit IRC18:20
openstackgerritSamuel Merritt proposed a change to openstack/swift: Check swift.conf MD5 with recon  https://review.openstack.org/8611418:30
notmynametorgomatic: that's a good idea :-)18:30
torgomaticnotmyname: :)18:31
*** saju_m has quit IRC18:44
openstackgerritSamuel Merritt proposed a change to openstack/swift: Fix deprecation warning  https://review.openstack.org/8611918:45
*** Guest_ has joined #openstack-swift19:00
*** tanee is now known as tanee-away19:04
*** mmcardle has joined #openstack-swift19:15
*** mmcardle has quit IRC19:19
*** piyush1 has quit IRC19:23
*** piyush has joined #openstack-swift19:25
*** gyee has quit IRC19:28
*** IRTermite has quit IRC19:34
*** lpabon has joined #openstack-swift19:45
*** praveenkumar has quit IRC19:51
*** IRTermite has joined #openstack-swift19:51
*** mmcardle has joined #openstack-swift19:56
*** piyush has quit IRC20:00
*** piyush1 has joined #openstack-swift20:00
*** mmcardle has quit IRC20:01
*** piyush has joined #openstack-swift20:11
*** piyush1 has quit IRC20:13
*** Trixboxer has quit IRC20:22
openstackgerritA change was merged to openstack/swift: Fix issue with account broker and pre-SPI databases  https://review.openstack.org/8384020:24
*** Guest_ has quit IRC20:29
*** Guest_ has joined #openstack-swift20:30
openstackgerritA change was merged to openstack/swift: Fixes versioning function tests with non-zero default policy  https://review.openstack.org/8251520:30
*** Guest_ has quit IRC20:38
*** Guest_ has joined #openstack-swift20:38
*** gyee has joined #openstack-swift20:41
tdasilvaportante, notmyname: the issue i was running into with the unit tests on fedora 19 was due to an older version of mock being installed. Not sure if we want to update test-requirements.txt, but it installed mock 0.8 for me20:52
notmynametdasilva: what version worked?20:52
tdasilvanotmyname: latest one, 1.0.1 i believe20:52
tdasilvaone sec20:53
tdasilvayes, that's correct20:53
tdasilvafor some reason on ubuntu the latest one is installed20:53
tdasilvaI will file a bug and test again, make sure it wasn't any mistake on my part20:54
notmynametdasilva: hang on, let me confirm20:55
notmynameFAIL: test_get_with_retries (test.unit.common.test_internal_client.TestSimpleClient)20:56
notmyname----------------------------------------------------------------------20:56
notmynameTraceback (most recent call last):20:56
notmyname  File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/mock.py", line 1224, in patched20:56
notmyname    return func(*args, **keywargs)20:56
notmyname  File "/home/swift/swift/test/unit/common/test_internal_client.py", line 1024, in test_get_with_retries20:56
notmyname    self.assertEqual(request.call_count, 3)20:56
notmynameAssertionError: 2 != 320:56
notmynametdasilva: was that what you saw?20:56
tdasilvayes20:56
notmynametdasilva: ok. our test-requirements currently has 0.8.0. which I just downgraded to on my precise SAIO.20:56
notmynameI had been using 1.0.120:57
tdasilvayes, 1.0.1 fixed an issue with 0.8 where side_effects was returning an exception object isntead of raising it20:57
notmynamethe global requirements in openstack has >=1.020:58
*** mmcardle has joined #openstack-swift20:58
notmynametdasilva: ok, thanks. when you put this into launchpad, can you also include a link to that mock fix?20:59
tdasilvanotmyname: sure, thanks!21:00
notmynametdasilva: no, thank you!21:00
tdasilvanotmyname: also, if you have any bugs or code to be reviewed that needs another set of eyes on it, please let me know21:01
notmynamehttps://review.openstack.org/#/q/-status:workinprogress+AND+status:open+AND+(project:openstack/swift-bench+OR+project:openstack/object-api+OR+project:openstack/swift+OR+project:openstack/python-swiftclient),n,z21:01
tdasilvahoping i can help more here21:01
notmyname;-)21:01
tdasilvacool, thanks!21:02
openstackgerritClay Gerrard proposed a change to openstack/swift: Update container storage_policy_index when auditing  https://review.openstack.org/8309321:02
notmynametdasilva: actually, https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Swift/PriorityReviews is a good link21:02
*** mmcardle has quit IRC21:02
claygnotmyname: what's going on with master merge to feature/ec21:03
notmynameclayg:https://review.openstack.org/#/c/85919/21:04
claygyeah i know - so... "recheck no bug"?21:05
*** ashish_ has quit IRC21:06
*** JuanManuelOlle has quit IRC21:08
notmynameI just now looked at it. I don't know yet21:09
peluselooks like no bug to me :)21:12
notmynameok, done21:13
peluseclayg:  how that that work - what you just posted for updating container SPI - rely on the reconciler or is a snake about to bite me on the nose?21:16
claygthe.... container auditor?21:18
*** lpabon has quit IRC21:20
openstackgerritA change was merged to openstack/swift: Fix deprecation warning  https://review.openstack.org/8611921:21
pelusehuh?  I don't see where/how SPI is set to 0 for a container that doesn't have an SPI in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/83093/321:22
peluseclayg:  In yuans previous patch set it was really obvious21:22
peluseahh hell, never mind21:22
pelusescreen was too small and needed to scroll over to see self._migrate_add_storage_policy_index(conn) :)21:23
*** tdasilva has left #openstack-swift21:23
claygpeluse: yeah doing in the auditor "by hand" was maybe more "obvious" - but I felt it violated the interface of the ContainerBroker a bit... and the test were sorta "fakey"...21:27
*** Guest_ has quit IRC21:27
claygmy change pushes all of the work of detecting and fixing schema migrations down in the broker where they probably belong and let me leaverage the existing preXXX_*_schmea tests in testbackend to make sure the migrations work as expected.21:28
claygThe change was really less about making the storage policy index 0 and more about getting schemas up-to-date (which just happens to mean setting storage_policy_index to a default value)21:28
*** piyush has left #openstack-swift21:30
claygpeluse: i'm not all together unhappy with how the change fell out - but please provide feedback if it seems too trixy (or worse, doesn't work)21:30
*** russellb has quit IRC21:44
*** russellb has joined #openstack-swift21:45
*** Gu_______ has joined #openstack-swift21:49
peluseclayg:  it looks cool on review.  Just pulled it down so will dork around with it and provide feedback on gerrit21:50
*** mmcardle has joined #openstack-swift22:00
openstackgerritpaul luse proposed a change to openstack/swift: Add Storage Policy Documentation  https://review.openstack.org/8582422:00
*** shri1 has joined #openstack-swift22:00
clayganyone know "Chetan Risbud" -> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/85908/22:01
openstackgerritpaul luse proposed a change to openstack/swift: Add Storage Policy Documentation  https://review.openstack.org/8582422:01
peluseclayg:  saw that too, no, I don't22:02
claygtoo funny22:02
creihthah.. he picked a heck of a review to start with :)22:02
*** shri has quit IRC22:02
*** russellb has quit IRC22:03
*** russellb has joined #openstack-swift22:03
*** zackf has quit IRC22:03
*** mmcardle has quit IRC22:04
claygwell i could see someone saying "wtf is a reconciler, that's stupid" and then getting hella confused if they thought that was a change against master :\22:05
zaitcevclayg: I'll e-mail him about it. Chetan works on Gluster22:06
claygzaitcev: oh cool!  yeah i was hoping he might jump in channel and ask out whats' going on22:07
zaitcevIRC may be a bridge too far22:07
peluseclayg:  good answer you provided though22:07
clayga gerrit review isn't a great place to do an architecture overview of storage polices, and definately not a good place to try and do a status update on ongoing work there22:07
claygzaitcev: lol(?)22:08
zaitcevWhen I joined, our disdain for e-mail was extremely aggravating.22:08
zaitcevBut as a highly paid professional, I learned to live with IRC and Gerrit.22:08
zaitcevStill, I am unable to conquer Trello thus far.22:09
claygwell you work for a big company - what do you guys do for real time chat if not IRC?22:10
zaitcevwell, sure. But that's for management and security team.22:10
peluseheh22:11
claygi think the jokes have gotten to meta for me to appreciate them anymore22:11
claygzaitcev: who the hell calls is_deleted with a timestamp?  It's like always been there but I don't why?22:12
zaitcevclayg: I need to research22:14
claygzaitcev: meh, it's not your fault or anything - i was just hoping you may have bumped into it while working on PBE22:15
zaitcevclayg: I did, and I wrote an XXX22:15
claygLOL!22:15
zaitcevI'm afraid we need to poke gholt or creiht about the is_deleted.22:20
creihtclayg, zaitcev: where at?22:23
*** mmcardle has joined #openstack-swift22:23
zaitcevcreiht: definition is https://github.com/openstack/swift/blob/master/swift/container/backend.py#L23822:25
zaitcevcreiht: callers are unknown. It was like this in swift-1.0.0, too.22:25
creihtI'll poke around a bit22:26
zaitcevI thought maybe an out-of-tree tool22:26
claygzaitcev: or maybe an old test case?22:27
zaitcevclayg: I checked tests too.22:27
claygah... i didn't bisect *that* hard ;)22:27
claygoh oh oh - maybe you just grepped everything in chucks init commit22:28
*** mmcardle has quit IRC22:28
zaitcevwell yeah22:29
creihtmaybe it was used by replication at one time?22:29
claygcomment sure makes it sound like something like that... but presumably they stopped needing it before the code was open sourced22:30
*** jergerber has quit IRC22:30
creihtyeah not sure22:30
creihtmaybe gholt or redbo could chime in there22:31
* clayg waves at redbo22:31
dmsimardOut of curiosity, have any of you guys tried Swift with Ubuntu trusty yet ?22:32
claygseems.... mighty.... trusting...22:33
creihtdmsimard: not yet, I was going to spin up another vm to test it when it was ga22:33
claygdmsimard: can I get a vagrant image for it?22:33
dmsimardclayg: http://cloud-images.ubuntu.com/trusty/current/22:34
redbohi22:34
dmsimardI'm building a trusty image for my CI right now, will try throwing my swift deployment at it and see what explodes22:34
claygyay!22:34
claygdmsimard: oh cool - well keep us posted22:34
dmsimardI guess this also means I'll be jumping from the Havana cloud archive repo to the Icehouse one22:35
dmsimardTalk about looking for trouble22:35
claygredbo: did you ever benchmark that sendfile thing?  was it super awesome - cause screw content checking22:35
redboI don't know, gholt wrote the is_deleted stuff for dbs.  You'll have to wait until he comes out of his benadryl coma.22:35
creihtheh22:36
*** jamie_h has joined #openstack-swift22:37
redboclayg: I couldn't tell much difference with it on my saio doing normal benchmarks.  I need try with big files or something so there's less httpy overhead.22:37
redboI'll need to allocate more storage to my saio first22:38
redboor maybe I can use our dev environment, that's probably the sort of thing it's for22:39
creihtredbo: ++22:41
*** Gu_______ has quit IRC22:54
*** Guest___ has joined #openstack-swift22:56
*** Guest___ has quit IRC22:59
*** mmcardle has joined #openstack-swift22:59
*** changbl has quit IRC23:00
*** mmcardle has quit IRC23:03
*** erlon has joined #openstack-swift23:07
anticwredbo: [context switch] have you use cloudfuse 'master' in the last 2+ weeks?  i did a pull, rebuld and ended up with something that auths, connects then stalls23:41
redbolet me try it23:43
*** _bluev has joined #openstack-swift23:44
redboanticw: it seems to be working for me.  What OS are you on?  Can you try running it with -d and see if it says anything helpful?23:45

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!