Friday, 2018-08-24

*** mriedem_afk has quit IRC01:05
openstackgerritMonty Taylor proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: baremetal: support newer microversions in {get,update,patch}_machine  https://review.openstack.org/59424201:24
*** mmedvede has quit IRC01:48
*** mmedvede has joined #openstack-sdks01:52
mordreddtantsur|afk: ok. SO - I dug all the way down the the rabbit hole in to keystoneauth and I don't think we can support versioned endpoints for ironic with the noauth / standalone without some updates to the version response from ironic02:06
mordredwe can update to fail more better02:06
mordredbut the version response has no microversion data02:06
mordredso we have to assume v102:06
mordredthat said - I think it wouldn't be awful to add the microversion info to the versioned response02:07
mordredand we can update keystoneauth slightly to make it upwards compatible when ironic grows doing that02:07
openstackgerritMonty Taylor proposed openstack/keystoneauth master: Add support for ironic single-version responses  https://review.openstack.org/59598002:16
mordreddtantsur|afk, TheJulia: ^^02:16
mordreddtantsur|afk: for now, in sdk, I think just putting in the try/except around the discovery failure seems to 'work' for endpoint things ... although given the goal is supporting newer microversions I'm not sure it fully achieves all of the goals02:20
mordreddtantsur|afk: we COULD try to add a warning if someone tries to use ironic through sdk with an endpoint_override that ends in /v1 - saying that microversions canot be detected02:22
mordredhrm02:22
*** dmsimard has quit IRC02:22
*** dmsimard has joined #openstack-sdks02:22
mordredthe discovery path might do the wrong thing is given an unversioned endpoint in endpoint_override02:23
*** dims has quit IRC02:28
*** mnaser has quit IRC02:28
*** TheJulia has quit IRC02:28
*** adriant has quit IRC02:28
*** slaweq has quit IRC02:28
*** Miouge has quit IRC02:28
*** mordred has quit IRC02:28
*** dims has joined #openstack-sdks02:30
*** mnaser has joined #openstack-sdks02:30
*** TheJulia has joined #openstack-sdks02:30
*** adriant has joined #openstack-sdks02:30
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-sdks02:30
*** Miouge has joined #openstack-sdks02:30
*** mordred has joined #openstack-sdks02:30
*** openstack has joined #openstack-sdks13:22
*** ChanServ sets mode: +o openstack13:22
*** openstackstatus has joined #openstack-sdks13:25
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v openstackstatus13:25
*** Luzi has quit IRC13:37
mnasermordred: does shade have a way of listing stack resources, i don't see one right off the bat..14:26
Shrewsmnaser: i don't see one either14:29
mnaserShrews: is there a way to get a client via shade or not anymore? would need to go to openstacksdk for that?14:29
Shrewsmnaser: there should be a orchestration_client property14:31
mnaserShrews: that's wonderful, thank you14:32
*** zxiiro has joined #openstack-sdks14:38
*** pooja_jadhav_ has joined #openstack-sdks14:42
*** ttsiouts has quit IRC14:46
openstackgerritSamuel de Medeiros Queiroz proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: WIP: Functional tests for core functionality  https://review.openstack.org/59635914:54
pooja_jadhav_hello all, I am wrirring functional_tests in openstacksdk for masakari. In that, for test_host module. for get_host_test, trying assert host objects. (expected, actual). But its failing because of timestamp in created_at field.14:57
pooja_jadhav_while creating host its giving correct datetime with timestamp. but while saving host record in DB, its saves only date nd time (not timestamp). so while getting that host, created_at field will append timestamp as 0000. its mismatching reference and actual object.14:58
pooja_jadhav_please anyone can help me in this?14:58
openstackgerritSamuel de Medeiros Queiroz proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: WIP: Functional tests for core functionality  https://review.openstack.org/59635915:01
cdentShrews: you have any insight on pooja_jadhav_ 's issue?15:03
Shrewspooja_jadhav_: cdent: my initial thought is to maybe compare individual fields (as test_create() does), or to mock the time function used15:04
Shrews(if i understand correctly)15:04
Shrewssorry, have to AFK for a bit now15:04
samueldmqmordred: cdent: Shrews: would be awesome to have your eyes on https://review.openstack.org/59635915:05
samueldmqI am sure it's not on shade patterns yet, but I wanted to make sure what I'm doing looks sane15:05
samueldmqit's for my masters research and I'd like to run that against several clouds really soon15:06
cdentsamueldmq: your masters is apparently more interesting than mine was :)15:06
*** ttsiouts has joined #openstack-sdks15:07
samueldmqcdent: what was yours about?15:09
samueldmqI'm investigating intra-platform interop in iaas, focusing on openstack15:09
cdentgenerically info science, but I guess if you had to label it with something it was sort of the intersection of HCI and engelbart's ideas on augmentation. So it wasn't actually boring at all, but it didn't involve assaulting clouds :)15:10
samueldmqheheh yes :) looks interesting15:13
samueldmqassaulting clouds seems interesting in the openstack context15:13
pooja_jadhav_shrews: Can u help me in the how to mock time function while creating any resource like (host or segment)15:42
pooja_jadhav_shrews: in the functional tests15:43
pooja_jadhav_shrews: so that i can assert whole object for remaining fields15:43
*** ttsiouts has quit IRC15:46
pooja_jadhav_shrews: But i think usually we dont use mock in functional tests15:46
*** pooja_jadhav_ has quit IRC15:50
*** dtantsur is now known as dtantsur|afk16:01
*** jpich has quit IRC16:31
*** gkadam has quit IRC16:38
*** gkadam has joined #openstack-sdks16:52
*** mriedem is now known as mriedem_afk17:02
*** tosky has quit IRC17:36
openstackgerritSamuel de Medeiros Queiroz proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: WIP: Functional tests for core functionality  https://review.openstack.org/59635917:44
*** olivierb_ has joined #openstack-sdks18:08
*** olivierb has quit IRC18:09
*** cdent has quit IRC18:14
*** gkadam has quit IRC18:30
*** mriedem_afk is now known as mriedem18:45
openstackgerritJulia Kreger proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: [DNM] Testing bifrost CI  https://review.openstack.org/59557218:51
*** mriedem has quit IRC19:40
openstackgerritJulia Kreger proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: [DNM] Testing bifrost CI  https://review.openstack.org/59557219:45
*** mriedem has joined #openstack-sdks19:48
*** olivierb has joined #openstack-sdks20:06
TheJuliadtantsur|afk: http://logs.openstack.org/25/596425/2/check/bifrost-integration-tinyipa-ubuntu-xenial/85f6c1b/job-output.txt.gz#_2018-08-24_19_52_46_756788 <-- tl;dr openstacksdk master branch state is broken for bifrost :\  But there is a pretty backtrace.20:07
*** olivierb_ has quit IRC20:07
*** olivierb_ has joined #openstack-sdks20:16
*** olivierb has quit IRC20:17
*** olivierb_ has quit IRC20:38
*** olivierb has joined #openstack-sdks20:41
samueldmqI love comments in openstackcloud21:09
samueldmqlooking at image create code when: "# This makes me want to die inside"21:09
samueldmqand others :-)21:10
TheJuliaheh21:16
*** olivierb has quit IRC22:06

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!