*** masayukig has quit IRC | 00:40 | |
*** masayukig has joined #openstack-requirements | 00:41 | |
prometheanfire | dirk: tonyb: plskthnx https://review.openstack.org/540105 | 01:47 |
---|---|---|
tonyb | prometheanfire: done | 01:48 |
prometheanfire | ty | 01:48 |
*** derekjhyang has joined #openstack-requirements | 02:50 | |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/requirements master: Update constraints for delayed Queens libs https://review.openstack.org/540105 | 04:28 |
prometheanfire | woot | 04:29 |
prometheanfire | we are now freezable | 04:29 |
*** derekjhyang has quit IRC | 05:23 | |
*** derekjhyang has joined #openstack-requirements | 05:23 | |
dirk | Nice | 05:51 |
openstackgerrit | OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/requirements master: Updated from generate-constraints https://review.openstack.org/538556 | 06:34 |
prometheanfire | smcginnis: python-blazarclient and python-kingbirdclient are being proposed by the bot, do I care? https://review.openstack.org/538556 | 06:39 |
*** jpich has joined #openstack-requirements | 07:51 | |
*** florianf has joined #openstack-requirements | 07:55 | |
*** ralonsoh has joined #openstack-requirements | 08:15 | |
openstackgerrit | Monty Taylor proposed openstack/requirements master: Update lower bound for openstacksdk to 0.11.2 https://review.openstack.org/540343 | 11:16 |
*** jpich has quit IRC | 12:01 | |
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-requirements | 12:17 | |
smcginnis | prometheanfire: Hmm, not sure where the blazarclient one came from. I thought we had done that one several days ago. | 13:40 |
smcginnis | prometheanfire: python-kingbirdclient must have been done by that team. | 13:40 |
smcginnis | prometheanfire: I don't see the blazarclient proposal in the open reviews. | 13:42 |
openstackgerrit | Qiming Teng proposed openstack/requirements master: Recap openstacksdk to 0.9.19 https://review.openstack.org/540388 | 14:03 |
prometheanfire | smcginnis: ya, confused me too | 14:41 |
smcginnis | ¯\(°_o)/¯ | 14:43 |
mordred | prometheanfire: was just chatting with the release team about those two patches above ^^ - my preference would be to raise the lower bound since the constraints cap is already in place (so that non-gate and gate match each other) - what do you think? | 15:29 |
*** florianf has quit IRC | 15:37 | |
prometheanfire | mordred: what do you mean specifically? | 16:06 |
prometheanfire | mordred: making the minimum change to what the current UC is? | 16:06 |
mordred | prometheanfire: yah | 16:25 |
prometheanfire | mordred: I don't think we'd like that :P | 16:26 |
prometheanfire | min bumps require specific reasoning for them | 16:27 |
mordred | prometheanfire: oh - there is a specific reason - octavia-dashboard needs 0.11 - it contains features they need for the queens release | 16:27 |
johnsom | It's a very visible bug fix for health monitors to be exact. | 16:28 |
mordred | prometheanfire: I'm guessing what I should have done is suggested we put a min-bump in with the constraints patch yesterday, yeah/ | 16:29 |
prometheanfire | mordred: probably | 16:30 |
prometheanfire | mordred: I think it's too late at this point, o-sdk is used too many places (that'd cause re-releases for them too) | 16:31 |
mordred | prometheanfire: kk. we can just keep it as a lesson learned for next time | 16:32 |
prometheanfire | mordred: thanks :D | 16:32 |
johnsom | prometheanfire So how do we handle it on the stable branch after release? | 16:32 |
prometheanfire | mordred: we can keep the patch for master for after the freeze though | 16:32 |
johnsom | This fix: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/522962/ is needed or the dashboard will give users errors when they do anything with health monitors. | 16:33 |
prometheanfire | johnsom: These should be few and far between on stable branches, mainly masking known bad versions or in extreme adding a maximum version allowable for a package. We work to remove these caps as well. Raising effective minimums is only acceptable during Phase I, and only due to security issues. | 16:34 |
prometheanfire | https://github.com/openstack/requirements/#global-requirements | 16:34 |
mordred | nod | 16:35 |
johnsom | Yeah, that is my worry. We are effectively going out with a broken release because we didn't get an SDK patch out | 16:35 |
prometheanfire | johnsom: it's not a broken release, UC is what's tested against and what openstack states is supported | 16:35 |
mordred | johnsom: well - it's metadata is broken - most users when they install the release will get 0.11.2 of sdk so will get the error message upgrades | 16:35 |
johnsom | prometheanfire Right now with the 0.9.x UC it's broken | 16:36 |
mordred | the thing that's incorrect is hat twe're telling people they *could* use an older version - and if they chose to do that it would be broken for them | 16:36 |
mordred | johnsom: yup. but UC bump landed | 16:36 |
mordred | johnsom: so you should be good on that front | 16:36 |
prometheanfire | so 0.11.2 is what's broken? | 16:36 |
prometheanfire | I'm confused | 16:37 |
prometheanfire | I thought 0.11.2 is the UC | 16:37 |
mordred | no - 0.9 is what's broken - if the UC was still pinned at 0.9 octavia-dashboard would be sad | 16:37 |
johnsom | Oh! Last time I looked UC didn't land. Ok, nevermind, I am fine! | 16:37 |
mordred | but the UC bumped, so it *should* be all good now | 16:37 |
prometheanfire | right, but it's not :P | 16:37 |
prometheanfire | johnsom: lol, k | 16:37 |
mordred | \o/ | 16:37 |
*** ralonsoh has quit IRC | 18:30 | |
*** edmondsw has quit IRC | 23:09 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!