| openstackgerrit | Monty Taylor proposed openstack/releases: Release 1.7.4 of os-client-config https://review.openstack.org/225520 | 00:12 |
|---|---|---|
| *** dimsum__ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 00:45 | |
| *** dimsum__ has quit IRC | 00:47 | |
| *** dimsum__ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 01:45 | |
| *** armax has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 01:46 | |
| *** dimsum__ has quit IRC | 02:00 | |
| *** armax has quit IRC | 02:16 | |
| openstackgerrit | Doug Hellmann proposed openstack/reno: move some default settings to a shared module https://review.openstack.org/225530 | 02:36 |
| openstackgerrit | Doug Hellmann proposed openstack/reno: move the rst formatter to its own module for reuse https://review.openstack.org/225531 | 02:36 |
| openstackgerrit | Doug Hellmann proposed openstack/reno: add sphinx extension https://review.openstack.org/225532 | 02:36 |
| dhellmann | ttx, lifeless : some reno patches for you to review ^^ | 02:40 |
| *** dimsum__ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 03:01 | |
| *** dimsum__ has quit IRC | 03:08 | |
| *** nikhil has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 04:34 | |
| *** dimsum__ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 05:05 | |
| *** patchbot has quit IRC | 05:06 | |
| *** dimsum__ has quit IRC | 05:11 | |
| *** patchbot has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 05:28 | |
| *** nikhil has quit IRC | 05:34 | |
| *** dimsum__ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 07:08 | |
| *** dimsum__ has quit IRC | 07:13 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/reno: move some default settings to a shared module https://review.openstack.org/225530 | 07:14 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/reno: move the rst formatter to its own module for reuse https://review.openstack.org/225531 | 07:18 |
| *** dtantsur|afk is now known as dtantsur | 07:32 | |
| *** dougwig has quit IRC | 08:53 | |
| *** dougwig has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 09:16 | |
| *** dtantsur is now known as dtantsur|brb | 09:32 | |
| *** dimsum__ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 09:47 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases: Add review notes to the readme https://review.openstack.org/224791 | 09:55 |
| ttx | SergeyLukjanov: ping for quick release status update | 10:08 |
| ttx | SergeyLukjanov: drop-hadoop-1 looks completed | 10:09 |
| ttx | The other two are a bit unclear | 10:11 |
| *** dtantsur|brb is now known as dtantsur | 10:33 | |
| *** TheJulia has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 11:17 | |
| dtantsur | hi folks! for those who are not release:managed yet, when will be a good time to create stable/liberty for a client library (namely, python-ironic-inspector-client)? | 11:26 |
| ttx | dtantsur: now | 11:27 |
| dtantsur | understood :) | 11:28 |
| TheJulia | I'm wanting to perform an initial release of bifrost this week, was hoping last week, but life. Anyway, which process should I be following since there are two from what I've read. | 11:28 |
| dtantsur | ttx, done, thank you. | 11:33 |
| ttx | dtantsur: you might want to push something like http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/oslo.rootwrap/commit/?h=stable/liberty&id=8b4c46c3d49c44c59cbfda27d9ab44fe9f894f2d to that branch now | 11:35 |
| dtantsur | ttx, oh yeah, thanks for reminder | 11:35 |
| *** gordc has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 11:41 | |
| *** flwang1 has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 12:04 | |
| flwang1 | dhellmann: ping | 12:11 |
| dtantsur | TheJulia, it depends on whether bifrost is release:managed or not | 12:25 |
| TheJulia | dtantsur: Thanks, that makes sense now. | 12:39 |
| *** TheJulia has left #openstack-relmgr-office | 12:41 | |
| *** dimsum__ has quit IRC | 12:47 | |
| *** dimsum__ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 12:47 | |
| *** dimsum__ is now known as dims | 12:48 | |
| *** dims is now known as Guest31942 | 12:49 | |
| *** Guest31942 is now known as dims__ | 12:49 | |
| *** nikhil has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 12:55 | |
| dhellmann | ttx: good morning | 12:59 |
| dhellmann | flwang1: pong | 12:59 |
| ttx | dhellmann: hola! | 13:01 |
| ttx | dhellmann: ready for the meeting ? | 13:01 |
| flwang1 | dhellmann: zaqar may need a client release, see https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-zaqarclient/+bug/1492866 | 13:02 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1492866 in Python client library for Zaqar "can't install zaqarclient as pbr version is too low" [Critical,Confirmed] | 13:02 |
| dhellmann | ttx: yep | 13:02 |
| dhellmann | flwang1: sure, we can do that. submit a request to the openstack/releases repo and get flaper87 to +1 | 13:02 |
| flwang1 | dhellmann: nice, thanks a lot | 13:03 |
| flaper87 | dhellmann: I'll +1 but flwang1 is the new PTL for Zaqar :) | 13:05 |
| flaper87 | (just a heads up) | 13:05 |
| dhellmann | flaper87: you're still the ptl for the liberty release | 13:23 |
| flaper87 | dhellmann: true that | 13:23 |
| dhellmann | flaper87: your job isn't done until after we've tagged and branched it :-) | 13:24 |
| dims__ | haha | 13:24 |
| openstackgerrit | Fei Long Wang proposed openstack/releases: Release python-zaqarclient 0.2.0 https://review.openstack.org/225671 | 13:28 |
| openstackgerrit | Kyle Mestery proposed openstack/releases: Release of python-neutronclient 3.0.1 https://review.openstack.org/225673 | 13:33 |
| *** superdan is now known as dansmith | 13:34 | |
| ttx | dhellmann: I'll create an etherpad for dumping notes for the Mitaka PTL relmgt primer. | 13:37 |
| ttx | https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/mitaka-ptl-relmgt-primer | 13:37 |
| dhellmann | ttx: great, thanks | 13:38 |
| ttx | We'll turn it into project-team-guide material once it solidifies | 13:38 |
| *** mriedem has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 13:39 | |
| dhellmann | oh, so that's for other ptls, I thought you meant it was notes for me :-) | 13:40 |
| ttx | haha | 13:40 |
| ttx | dhellmann: no it's more like "you should do stable point releases from time to time, we won't do them for you anymore" | 13:41 |
| ttx | SergeyLukjanov: nikhil: mestery: redrobot: Ping me for a quick release status update | 13:42 |
| mestery | ttx: I'm just going over LP now, give me about 5 minutes or so to ready myself | 13:42 |
| ttx | mestery: sure | 13:42 |
| dhellmann | ttx: ++ | 13:46 |
| *** flwang1 has quit IRC | 13:48 | |
| mestery | ttx: o/ | 13:48 |
| ttx | https://launchpad.net/neutron/+milestone/liberty-rc1 | 13:49 |
| ttx | mestery: So we gave until today for those FFEs... how far are those last two ? | 13:49 |
| mestery | https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/lbaas-ref-octavia has it's final patch at the top of the check queue now, on it's way into the merge queue | 13:49 |
| ttx | ok good | 13:49 |
| mestery | Sadly, https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/neutron-flavor-framework-templates has 3 reviews out, 2 of which haven't seen that much action. I think it's out of Liberty now. | 13:49 |
| ttx | mestery: yeah | 13:50 |
| mestery | Let me talk to dougwig to verify how bad that is if it misses | 13:50 |
| mestery | My gut says it's more annoying than critical | 13:50 |
| ttx | yeah, but fair to those who have been rejected 3 weeks ago | 13:50 |
| mestery | Right | 13:50 |
| openstackgerrit | Doug Hellmann proposed openstack/reno: add sphinx extension https://review.openstack.org/225532 | 13:57 |
| *** david-ly_ is now known as david-lyle | 14:01 | |
| *** bdemers has quit IRC | 14:02 | |
| ttx | mestery: otherwise you have 13 bugs listed -- are all those coming with fixes ? what would be your ETA for RC1 based on that ? | 14:02 |
| mestery | I'm going through those now, and will boot out ones which are not necessary for the RC. I expect we'll have a few of them. Should we plan to do the RC1 tomorrow then? | 14:03 |
| ttx | mestery: if you can get to the bottom of the release-critical list, sure. You don't want to do that too early to avoid backporting pain | 14:04 |
| mestery | Ack | 14:04 |
| *** bdemers has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 14:04 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases: Release 1.7.4 of os-client-config https://review.openstack.org/225520 | 14:12 |
| *** bswartz has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 14:14 | |
| bswartz | ttx, dhellmann: any chance to bump python-manilaclient minimum version in g-r? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/225186/ | 14:14 |
| bswartz | or is this not happening? | 14:15 |
| dhellmann | bswartz: does a feature in another project depend on that version? | 14:16 |
| dhellmann | bswartz: if not, we should only need the constraints file updated | 14:16 |
| bswartz | dhellmann: manila-ui would break with 1.2 version of client, 1.3 is needed at minumum | 14:16 |
| bswartz | 1.4 also works | 14:17 |
| bswartz | we are holding off on tagging of manila-ui release because we're hoping for a g-r bump first | 14:17 |
| dhellmann | bswartz: how are manila client's tests passing? | 14:18 |
| dhellmann | sorry, ui | 14:18 |
| *** jhesketh has quit IRC | 14:20 | |
| bswartz | dhellmann: manila-ui has poor test coverage, evidently | 14:20 |
| bswartz | something we need to fix | 14:20 |
| *** jhesketh has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 14:20 | |
| dhellmann | bswartz: so you need manilaclient lower bound raised to its current version, and then we can tag manila-ui? /cc ttx | 14:21 |
| bswartz | dhellmann: we need it raised from 1.2.0 to 1.3.0 at least -- 1.4.0 would also be acceptable | 14:22 |
| *** david-lyle has quit IRC | 14:22 | |
| dhellmann | bswartz: 1.4.0 implies there is a new feature, does nothing use that feature? | 14:24 |
| bswartz | dhellmann: correct, the UI was not updated to use the features added in 1.4.0 | 14:25 |
| dhellmann | ok | 14:25 |
| bswartz | however 1.3.0 contains microversion support, which is essential for working with new manila server | 14:26 |
| dhellmann | bswartz: I'm juggling several other projects right now, so go ahead and pick a version and submit the patch to g-r -- if that existing patch is enough, that's fine, too | 14:26 |
| *** david-lyle has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 14:26 | |
| bswartz | dhellmann: the existing patch is sufficient for us -- when will you make a decision? | 14:26 |
| dhellmann | flaper87: I don't understand your comment on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/225671/ | 14:26 |
| dhellmann | bswartz: if you need it updated, we'll do it, I just need another release team member to vote, too | 14:27 |
| ttx | bswartz: dhellmann: buming that sounds good to me | 14:27 |
| ttx | I'll +2 | 14:27 |
| flaper87 | dhellmann: sorry, I did that on a rush. The commit referenced in that release request points to a g-r update but there are no release notes in zaqarclient for 0.2 | 14:27 |
| flaper87 | I just created them, I'll update the openstack/releases review | 14:27 |
| flaper87 | dhellmann: sorry for such a confusing comment | 14:28 |
| *** armax has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 14:28 | |
| dhellmann | flaper87: np, that makes sense | 14:28 |
| dhellmann | flaper87: we should get you set up with pbr's changelog generation | 14:28 |
| flaper87 | dhellmann: I'm all for that, any link I should read? | 14:29 |
| flaper87 | or code | 14:29 |
| dhellmann | flaper87: take a look at one of the oslo libs to see how they include the ChangeLog file in a history.rst | 14:29 |
| * flaper87 does that | 14:30 | |
| ttx | SergeyLukjanov, nikhil_k, redrobot, david-lyle: ping me when around for quick release status | 14:31 |
| SergeyLukjanov | ttx, hi, I've unexpectedly moved to Mountain View for the next 2 weeks, sorry about non-answering | 14:32 |
| SergeyLukjanov | take me 5 mins for launchpad cleanup and I'll return back to you | 14:32 |
| ttx | SergeyLukjanov: that happens | 14:32 |
| ttx | sure, ping me when ready | 14:32 |
| SergeyLukjanov | ttx, sorry for the latency - it was worst internet during the flight | 14:33 |
| SergeyLukjanov | ttx, even IRC wasn't able to connect :) | 14:33 |
| flaper87 | dhellmann: updated the patch | 14:39 |
| dhellmann | flaper87: ty | 14:39 |
| SergeyLukjanov | ttx, are we intended to make RC this week? | 14:42 |
| ttx | SergeyLukjanov: ideally sometimes this week yes | 14:43 |
| dhellmann | ttx: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/225626/ looks ok, when you have a minute | 14:49 |
| dhellmann | ttx: also https://review.openstack.org/#/c/225491/ | 14:50 |
| jokke_ | dhellmann: would be extremely nice of you not to ask update something if you're going to script it anyways (Ref. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/223513/) ;) | 14:50 |
| ttx | dhellmann: both approved | 14:51 |
| dhellmann | jokke_: I didn't see that you'd updated that patch before the scripted update, sorry | 14:51 |
| *** wshao has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 14:51 | |
| dhellmann | ttx: I updated https://review.openstack.org/#/c/225363/ for the new os-client-config 1.7.4 | 14:52 |
| SergeyLukjanov | ttx, I've cleaned up the https://launchpad.net/sahara/+milestone/liberty-rc1 and it seems like we still need some time for fixing bugs, we've found many of them unfortunately last day... | 15:11 |
| SergeyLukjanov | ttx, many of them already approved and in the gate | 15:12 |
| SergeyLukjanov | ttx, I would say that there is still a good chance for RC1 in the end of week | 15:13 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases: Release python-zaqarclient 0.2.0 https://review.openstack.org/225671 | 15:14 |
| ttx | SergeyLukjanov: I'm mostkly concerned about FFEs at this stage | 15:14 |
| ttx | Thsoe should have been merged weeks ago now, this prevents proper testing | 15:14 |
| ttx | How far are those last two ? | 15:15 |
| ttx | If not already in the merge pipe I'd just defer them at this stage | 15:15 |
| nikhil | ttx (was on other channel for some meeting/sync for rc) here now | 15:16 |
| ttx | nikhil: looking at https://launchpad.net/glance/+milestone/liberty-rc1 | 15:17 |
| ttx | We are now almost three weeks past FF, we can't really still have FFEs | 15:18 |
| ttx | so unless they are already approved and gating, my take would be to defer | 15:18 |
| nikhil | ttx yes, we are just discussing on that issue | 15:19 |
| ttx | unless you can convince me waiting a few more days will change anything | 15:19 |
| ttx | but we have been "waiting a few more days" for the last 2 weeks now | 15:19 |
| nikhil | ttx I will send you a final decision today | 15:19 |
| ttx | ok | 15:19 |
| nikhil | ttx the plan was always that we will make a final call today | 15:20 |
| dhellmann | ttx: constraint update for zaqarclient: https://review.openstack.org/225892 | 15:20 |
| nikhil | if things delay ie | 15:20 |
| ttx | nikhil: ok | 15:20 |
| dhellmann | ttx: I can just approve these, if you want, but I thought given the timing it might be better to coordinate | 15:20 |
| ttx | dhellmann: I'm fine reviewing them | 15:20 |
| dhellmann | ok | 15:21 |
| ttx | dhellmann: weird zaqarclient line placement at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/225892/1/upper-constraints.txt | 15:21 |
| ttx | redrobot, david-lyle, morgan: ping me when around for quick release status | 15:23 |
| redrobot | ttx o/ | 15:23 |
| ttx | redrobot: https://launchpad.net/barbican/+milestone/liberty-rc1 | 15:23 |
| bswartz | ttx dhellmann: are we using the openstack/releases project for release candidates? | 15:24 |
| ttx | that FFE had until end of last week. How close is it ? | 15:24 |
| ttx | redrobot: ^ | 15:24 |
| ttx | bswartz: no | 15:24 |
| morgan | ttx: o/ saw it this time earlier than last week | 15:24 |
| redrobot | ttx functionality has landed, but there's a couple of bugs that were found that we're currently addressing | 15:24 |
| dhellmann | ttx: the edit constraints command does that, and I always forget to fix it by hand | 15:24 |
| ttx | morgan: https://launchpad.net/keystone/+milestone/liberty-rc1 | 15:24 |
| bswartz | ttx: what's the procedure once we have git commit hash for RC1? | 15:24 |
| ttx | morgan: how close is that last FFE ? | 15:24 |
| morgan | No idea. I think it is getting punted today to mitaka | 15:25 |
| ttx | redrobot: maybe mark the FFE complete and list RC bugs to cover for the rest ? | 15:25 |
| ttx | morgan: that's probably the right call | 15:25 |
| redrobot | ttx yes, I can do that | 15:25 |
| morgan | I'll have that dealt with by tomorrow | 15:25 |
| ttx | morgan: you need to focus and burn those RC bugs now, I'd like a RC1 for keystone sooner rather than later | 15:25 |
| ttx | redrobot: that way I'll stop being on your back for still having FFEs lying around | 15:26 |
| morgan | And the bugs are up for review too to be punted out and backported if really important | 15:26 |
| ttx | bswartz: you ping me with it on IRC* | 15:26 |
| ttx | morgan: ok | 15:26 |
| bswartz | ttx: hopefully today | 15:27 |
| redrobot | ttx hehe, sounds good, I'll get those cleaned up in the next couple of hours | 15:27 |
| ttx | bswartz: nice. I'll probably not be around when ready but I can tag first thing tomorrow morning | 15:27 |
| ttx | bswartz: it's not impossible dhellmann will have a requirements update for you to merge too | 15:27 |
| bswartz | ttx: best case it will be ready in 2 hours -- but gate is slowing down | 15:28 |
| bswartz | oh yes | 15:28 |
| bswartz | we could wait for that | 15:28 |
| ttx | bswartz: we could wait for tomorrow when we are both up, and make a final call then ? | 15:28 |
| * bswartz is impatient... | 15:28 | |
| bswartz | yes we can do it tomorrow | 15:28 |
| bswartz | not sure how long we'll be babysitting the gate today | 15:29 |
| morgan | Ttx: bp/ffe is done fwiw. Being marked as closed now | 15:29 |
| bswartz | manila top priority for mitaka: make our gate stable | 15:29 |
| ttx | morgan: perfect. Now we can burn those bugs and make a call later this week if necessary | 15:30 |
| morgan | Hoping to have it all done by tomorrow | 15:30 |
| morgan | If it isnt really a rc bug it is gone | 15:30 |
| ttx | yeah, I think it's good to throw it out there and start the backport game | 15:30 |
| ttx | (and unfreeze master) | 15:31 |
| ttx | SergeyLukjanov: how far are the last two FFEs ? | 15:33 |
| ttx | david-lyle, stevebaker: ping me when around for a quick release status update about FFEs | 15:33 |
| david-lyle | ttx: o/ | 15:33 |
| SergeyLukjanov | ttx, sorry, I've beeb re-reviewing them, I think that both should be moved to M, I'll chat with authors and core team today re it, but it's a default direction | 15:34 |
| ttx | SergeyLukjanov: ok, keep me posted on what you do with them | 15:34 |
| SergeyLukjanov | ttx, sure, thx! | 15:34 |
| ttx | david-lyle: how far is that last FFE of yours ? | 15:34 |
| david-lyle | close a couple of smaller issue there is some disagreement about | 15:35 |
| david-lyle | whether fix as part of FFE patch or after | 15:35 |
| david-lyle | will try to resolve today | 15:35 |
| ttx | david-lyle: if most of the work is landed and the remaining are fixes (i.e .the feature is testable already) I'm fine with marking the BP implemented and filing RC bugs ot cover the critical issues | 15:36 |
| ttx | that will signal that you can start testing the thing | 15:36 |
| david-lyle | that's my thought too, just want to check with the blocking reviewer | 15:37 |
| ttx | david-lyle: sounds good | 15:37 |
| morgan | ttx: ok down to two open bugs and one gating. One more bug may land today (not on the list) but otherwise we are pretty narrow for rc1 | 15:46 |
| *** dtantsur is now known as dtantsur|afk | 15:46 | |
| ttx | morgan: sounds good | 16:01 |
| *** wshao has quit IRC | 16:01 | |
| *** patchbot has quit IRC | 16:27 | |
| *** patchbot has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 16:27 | |
| dougwig | ttx, mestery: totally fair to kick flavors to M. | 16:29 |
| mestery | dougwig: It's done :) | 16:53 |
| *** dtantsur|afk is now known as dtantsur | 16:54 | |
| *** dtantsur is now known as dtantsur|afk | 18:03 | |
| thingee | dhellmann: cinderclient is good with 1.4.0 | 18:04 |
| dhellmann | thingee: great, thanks | 18:04 |
| thingee | dhellmann: Can propose a tag in an hour I'm estimating with some stuff landing for os-brick | 18:05 |
| dhellmann | thingee: I've made a note to wait for you to do that before I cut the branch | 18:05 |
| thingee | dhellmann: thanks | 18:05 |
| lifeless | mdhellmann: o/ so - did you seem my questions with dims the other day over 'deps change is a minor version bump | 18:09 |
| lifeless | bah | 18:09 |
| lifeless | dhellmann: o/ so - did you seem my questions with dims the other day over 'deps change is a minor version bump'? | 18:09 |
| thingee | dhellmann: I did just have something come on my radar for cinderclient with a bug in fetch project quota information https://review.openstack.org/#/c/225891/3 | 18:10 |
| thingee | dhellmann: it's too bad we don't have tempest coverage to have caught this | 18:10 |
| openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/releases: liberty: release python-novaclient 2.30.0 https://review.openstack.org/225976 | 18:34 |
| mriedem | dhellmann: ^ | 18:34 |
| mriedem | johnthetubaguy: ^ | 18:34 |
| dhellmann | lifeless: I did. I may be interpreting the backwards-compatibility definition more strictly than intended. | 19:04 |
| dhellmann | thingee: that looks like something worth backporting | 19:04 |
| dhellmann | mriedem: great, thanks! | 19:05 |
| lifeless | dhellmann: whats a good place to discuss this, do you think? List? Cross-project meeting? a doc patch on pbr? | 19:08 |
| lifeless | dhellmann: I specifically want distro input | 19:08 |
| dhellmann | lifeless: the mailing list, I would think. | 19:08 |
| lifeless | [partly wearing my Debian developer hat, but mainly because the folk on the pointy edge there should have opinions] | 19:08 |
| dhellmann | lifeless: while I have you: do you have any idea why the edit constraints tool is reordering the constraints file when it makes changes? it seems to always move the modified item to the top of the file | 19:11 |
| lifeless | dhellmann: >>> sorted('/a') | 19:13 |
| lifeless | ['/', 'a'] | 19:13 |
| dhellmann | ? | 19:14 |
| lifeless | dhellmann: / sorts before the names | 19:14 |
| dhellmann | where does '/' come from? | 19:14 |
| lifeless | IIRC its got a sorted() in there | 19:14 |
| lifeless | hmm, oh, we do file:// right... not sure | 19:14 |
| lifeless | I can poke | 19:14 |
| dhellmann | lifeless: this is showing up when I submit a constraint change with 1 edit for a new release | 19:15 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases: liberty: release python-novaclient 2.30.0 https://review.openstack.org/225976 | 19:15 |
| dhellmann | lifeless: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/225892/1 is an example (fixed in ps 2) | 19:15 |
| bswartz | dhellmann: how long does it take the proposal bot to propagate a g-r change? | 19:19 |
| dhellmann | bswartz: I'm not sure how often that runs. Are you expecting a proposal today? | 19:20 |
| bswartz | dhellmann: well my change merged: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/225186/ and I was waiting for a g-r update in manila | 19:21 |
| bswartz | is it a good idea to just make the requirements update myself instead of waiting? | 19:22 |
| dhellmann | bswartz: yeah, you might want to just make that update yourself to avoid delay | 19:22 |
| lifeless | dhellmann: ah heh, edit was not aimed at folk proposing merges to the repo | 19:26 |
| dims__ | dhellmann: sorry had a tough morning at work, got free a bit just now...anything i can help with? | 19:26 |
| lifeless | dhellmann: so its just a missing feature to make it have the same sort order | 19:26 |
| lifeless | dhellmann: that said, we really need to down tools and fix the auto-merger | 19:27 |
| dhellmann | lifeless: ok, cool, not a big deal | 19:27 |
| lifeless | dhellmann: its failing jobs which means there is a bad- incompatible- set of things out there | 19:27 |
| lifeless | i.e. its doing its job, we're not doing ours | 19:27 |
| dhellmann | lifeless: right, and at this point I only want to update things we ourselves are releasing anyway | 19:27 |
| lifeless | dhellmann: I'd be ok with that - but - knowing we're incompatible with *something* is a red flag to cutting releases IMO | 19:28 |
| dhellmann | dims__: hi! I think we're good. we're waiting for a couple of libraries to settle before I start creating stable branches | 19:28 |
| lifeless | dhellmann: its ok for us to say 'lets not change the versions we're using yet', its not so ok to say 'lets release even though XYZ breaks us' | 19:28 |
| dhellmann | lifeless: that's fair, but when the patch has N>5 things in it, I don't have time to sort out what the cause of the incompatibility is on my own :-/ | 19:28 |
| lifeless | dhellmann: right, so what should we do? I started a thread on it on the list | 19:28 |
| lifeless | dhellmann: I think we want to make this a bit of a bigger deal since the release time is -now- | 19:29 |
| dhellmann | sure | 19:29 |
| dhellmann | lifeless: could we make the auto-updater submit changes as a series instead of one patch? | 19:34 |
| dhellmann | lifeless, dims__ : votes on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/225892/1 would be helpful if you have a minute | 19:37 |
| dhellmann | sorry, remove the /1 there | 19:37 |
| openstackgerrit | Doug Hellmann proposed openstack-infra/release-tools: Report all unreleased library changes https://review.openstack.org/191220 | 19:50 |
| openstackgerrit | Doug Hellmann proposed openstack-infra/release-tools: add a consistent topic to all .gitreview updates https://review.openstack.org/226017 | 19:50 |
| openstackgerrit | Doug Hellmann proposed openstack-infra/release-tools: remove duplicate function title https://review.openstack.org/226018 | 19:50 |
| lifeless | dhellmann: I don't think a series makes sense | 19:51 |
| lifeless | dhellmann: its entirely likely that some updates will be blocks that need to migrate togther | 19:52 |
| dhellmann | yeah, I was looking for a way to have the failing test job tell us which libs are incompatible | 19:52 |
| dhellmann | if we get into that state, we could reorder manually | 19:52 |
| lifeless | dhellmann: so, I'd rather write a tool to do a binary search given this stat | 19:52 |
| lifeless | dhellmann: and run it on a vm | 19:52 |
| lifeless | dhellmann: or something, I dunno | 19:52 |
| dhellmann | that'd work, too | 19:52 |
| dhellmann | maybe even an experimental job we could trigger when the normal jobs fail? | 19:52 |
| lifeless | yeah | 19:53 |
| lifeless | a series might be doable, but I'm worried about the time investment to make it properly idempotent | 19:53 |
| lifeless | vs the return we get | 19:53 |
| dhellmann | yeah | 19:53 |
| lifeless | I've just mailed the list | 19:54 |
| dhellmann | mriedem: novaclient 2.30.0 is ready to become stable/liberty, right? | 19:56 |
| mriedem | dhellmann: yeah | 19:57 |
| dhellmann | ok, doing that now | 19:57 |
| dhellmann | mriedem: done | 19:58 |
| mriedem | thanks | 19:59 |
| dims__ | lifeless: ack on the mailing list request, i'll kick the tires on 221157 | 20:03 |
| lifeless | dims__: I'm hoping to provoke non-releases folk into helping :) | 20:06 |
| dims__ | ack, hence did not reply to ML :) | 20:06 |
| lifeless | :) | 20:07 |
| lifeless | see -infra chatter too | 20:08 |
| lifeless | mordred says its only just landed in os-client-config, so likely they need to cut a release too | 20:08 |
| dims__ | ah i thought we cut a release already | 20:13 |
| dhellmann | we did that release earlier today | 20:14 |
| dhellmann | we need some devstack changes to land before it can be added to the constraints file | 20:14 |
| *** bswartz has quit IRC | 20:27 | |
| dhellmann | flaper87: for the falcon requirements change, do you need features in the newer version or is the old version just buggy? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/225886/ | 20:40 |
| dhellmann | thingee: now that https://review.openstack.org/#/c/220902/ has merged are you ready for an os-brick release? | 20:44 |
| stevebaker | dhellmann: I'm ready for a sync on heat when you are | 20:56 |
| openstackgerrit | Doug Hellmann proposed openstack-infra/release-tools: provide a better error message when a team is not found https://review.openstack.org/226051 | 21:02 |
| openstackgerrit | Doug Hellmann proposed openstack-infra/release-tools: change Oslo to oslo https://review.openstack.org/226052 | 21:02 |
| *** bnemec has quit IRC | 21:27 | |
| *** flwang1 has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 21:36 | |
| *** bnemec has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 21:41 | |
| *** mriedem is now known as mriedem_away | 21:43 | |
| gordc | dhellmann: qq, is stable/juno clients consider eol? | 21:53 |
| thingee | dhellmann: we weren't waiting on that one. that was a patch I wanted to do a retag for, but there were others in gate about to land that I was waiting for if I was going to do a tag soon anyways | 22:00 |
| thingee | dhellmann: looks like they all landed so I'm going to propose a hash for tag | 22:01 |
| openstackgerrit | Mike Perez proposed openstack/releases: os-brick release 0.4.1 https://review.openstack.org/226074 | 22:07 |
| thingee | dhellmann: ^ | 22:09 |
| thingee | thanks! | 22:09 |
| *** gordc has quit IRC | 22:19 | |
| *** dims__ has quit IRC | 22:37 | |
| *** dims has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 23:17 | |
| *** dims has quit IRC | 23:23 | |
| *** dims has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 23:23 | |
| *** dims has quit IRC | 23:39 | |
| *** dims has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 23:40 | |
| *** dims_ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 23:43 | |
| *** dims has quit IRC | 23:45 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!