| *** sigmavirus24 is now known as sigmavirus24_awa | 00:10 | |
| *** armax has quit IRC | 01:04 | |
| *** armax has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 01:05 | |
| *** armax has quit IRC | 01:27 | |
| *** dims has quit IRC | 02:01 | |
| *** armax has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 02:11 | |
| *** dims has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 02:20 | |
| *** sigmavirus24_awa is now known as sigmavirus24 | 02:21 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases: Release python-novaclient 2.28.0 https://review.openstack.org/220349 | 02:40 |
|---|---|---|
| *** bswartz has quit IRC | 02:49 | |
| *** dims has quit IRC | 02:49 | |
| *** armax has quit IRC | 02:51 | |
| *** TravT has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 03:04 | |
| *** TravT_ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 03:08 | |
| *** openstackgerrit_ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 03:11 | |
| *** TravT has quit IRC | 03:12 | |
| *** sigmavirus24 is now known as sigmavirus24_awa | 03:15 | |
| *** dims_ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 03:17 | |
| *** jroll has quit IRC | 03:28 | |
| *** sigmavirus24_awa has quit IRC | 03:28 | |
| *** jroll has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 03:34 | |
| *** sigmavirus24_awa has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 03:34 | |
| *** armax has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 03:44 | |
| *** dims_ has quit IRC | 04:09 | |
| *** dims has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 04:10 | |
| *** openstackgerrit_ has quit IRC | 04:14 | |
| *** dims has quit IRC | 04:17 | |
| *** asalkeld has left #openstack-relmgr-office | 05:54 | |
| ttx | ok, tagging glance now | 06:35 |
| *** TravT_ has quit IRC | 07:06 | |
| *** TravT has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 07:21 | |
| *** armax has quit IRC | 07:44 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack-infra/release-tools: Script to release cycle-with-intermediary https://review.openstack.org/219274 | 08:23 |
| ttx | dhellmann: I think we can start approving the release tag changes | 10:16 |
| dhellmann | ttx: "release tag changes"? | 11:31 |
| dhellmann | oh, in governance? | 11:31 |
| ttx | yes | 11:32 |
| ttx | the oens where we have PTLs+1 should be good to go | 11:32 |
| ttx | dhellmann: I propose we have a quick meeting in a few hours since Monday is a US holiday | 11:33 |
| dhellmann | sounds good | 11:33 |
| ttx | we can reviewx them there | 11:33 |
| *** gordc has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 11:35 | |
| sdague | ttx: hey, is it possible to give me bug supervisor on grenade - https://bugs.launchpad.net/grenade - I realized that projects is in weird permissions orphan land | 11:41 |
| sdague | so no one can really do much with the bugs | 11:41 |
| dhellmann | sdague: looking | 11:41 |
| ttx | sdague: it's owned by dtroyer | 11:42 |
| dhellmann | sdague: I don't have any permissions on the project. Is dtroyer around today, he can change the ownership | 11:42 |
| ttx | I can't help there | 11:42 |
| sdague | ok, no prob | 11:42 |
| sdague | should it be set to owned by some other openstack entity? | 11:42 |
| sdague | so that you guys can make changes in the future? | 11:43 |
| dhellmann | yeah, let me find the doc | 11:43 |
| dhellmann | sdague: http://docs.openstack.org/infra/manual/creators.html#set-up-launchpad | 11:43 |
| sdague | I'll then work with dtroyer to get it sorted | 11:43 |
| sdague | cool, thank you | 11:43 |
| openstackgerrit | Doug Hellmann proposed openstack/releases: add external links https://review.openstack.org/220479 | 12:28 |
| *** sigmavirus24_awa is now known as sigmavirus24 | 12:32 | |
| *** sigmavirus24 is now known as sigmavirus24_awa | 12:39 | |
| *** dims has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 12:42 | |
| *** smcginnis_afk is now known as smcginnis | 13:06 | |
| johnthetubaguy | dhellmann: ttx: his just wanted to check about stringfreeze, are we still following the same process this release? | 13:07 |
| johnthetubaguy | s/his/hi/ | 13:07 |
| ttx | johnthetubaguy: yeah, maybe doublecheck with Daisy and Lana how strictly they want it | 13:10 |
| johnthetubaguy | OK, we were assuming the same as normal so far | 13:11 |
| ttx | obviously the cost for them is not the same today and in a month time | 13:12 |
| dims | dhellmann: good morning. took care of python-novaclient last night was had broken stuff (interop) | 13:13 |
| dhellmann | dims: thanks! I was offline by the time all of that was ready | 13:13 |
| dims | dhellmann: no worries | 13:14 |
| dims | y it was very late. i was in mountain view this week so was working west coast time | 13:14 |
| dhellmann | ah, good, I was wondering what might have kept you up so late :-) | 13:15 |
| dims | dhellmann: i was listening to the folks from Akanda talking at OpenStack SFO meetup at the HP building when i cut the release :) - yes, they did mention you in the talk! | 13:15 |
| dhellmann | heh | 13:15 |
| ttx | dhellmann, dims: how about we do a release meeting in 13min ? (to replace Monday's) | 13:17 |
| dhellmann | ttx: wfm | 13:17 |
| ttx | liberty-3 postmortem and next steps | 13:17 |
| dims | ttx: +1 i can listen in | 13:18 |
| *** mestery has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 13:24 | |
| *** mestery has quit IRC | 13:26 | |
| *** mestery has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 13:27 | |
| ttx | we can occupy #openstack-meeting, nobody there at that hour | 13:29 |
| jroll | dhellmann: just wanted to make sure you saw this and are good with the plan http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-September/073630.html | 13:47 |
| dhellmann | jroll: I'll look after this meeting ends | 13:49 |
| jroll | yeah no rush :) | 13:54 |
| *** dansmith is now known as superdan | 13:56 | |
| ttx | dhellmann, sdague: any fancy dashboard or should we just take the default view ? | 14:08 |
| *** sigmavirus24_awa is now known as sigmavirus24 | 14:08 | |
| dhellmann | we have a lot of jenkins failures right now, so my dashboard query is pretty empty | 14:08 |
| dhellmann | I'm looking at https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack%2Frequirements+is:open,n,z | 14:09 |
| ttx | yep same here | 14:09 |
| ttx | bottom to top? top to bottom ? random order ? | 14:09 |
| ttx | bottom to top is useless, lots of -2 stalled ones there | 14:10 |
| dhellmann | yeah, top to bottom | 14:10 |
| ttx | dhellmann: we should focus on master ones | 14:10 |
| ttx | https://review.openstack.org/#/q/is:open+project:openstack/requirements+branch:master,n,z | 14:10 |
| dhellmann | k | 14:10 |
| dhellmann | the ironic client change is fine except they didn't fix the constraints file, too | 14:11 |
| ttx | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/219568/ is being rechecked | 14:11 |
| dhellmann | should I take that over and correct it? | 14:11 |
| ttx | dhellmann: good idea, then we can approve it | 14:11 |
| ttx | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/219568/ is an automated constraints bump -- we can freeze before or after it | 14:12 |
| ttx | after is probably nice since it's been blocked for a couple days already | 14:12 |
| ttx | It has a weird keystoneauth1===2.0 --> keystoneauth1===1.0.0 change | 14:13 |
| dhellmann | that's odd | 14:13 |
| dhellmann | I updated https://review.openstack.org/#/c/220174/ with the constraints file change | 14:13 |
| ttx | the rest sounds mostly sane | 14:13 |
| dhellmann | the bootswatch change in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/220363/ seems ok, I'll approve if you agree | 14:14 |
| ttx | keystoneauth1 is without a constraint on global-req so the plot deepens | 14:14 |
| dhellmann | morgan: what's the story with keystoneauth's dist name? ^^ | 14:15 |
| ttx | pip certainly doesn't have 2.0.0 | 14:15 |
| dhellmann | we just released 1.0.0 this week | 14:15 |
| ttx | hmm, could have been an error in efee994 where it was introduced | 14:16 |
| ttx | it was set to ===2.0 by the commit introducing it | 14:17 |
| ttx | so I think ===1.0 makes sense | 14:17 |
| ttx | ok, I'll +2 it | 14:17 |
| ttx | one of you can do the final nail in the coffin and +2/approve | 14:18 |
| sdague | I'm working a couple of other threads atm, so ping me if there is a concern. Honestly, I'm more concerned that most of these are jenkins -1 | 14:18 |
| dhellmann | a lot of these failures are because of the missed addition of liberty in the allowed branches in d-g, so I'm rechecking them | 14:18 |
| ttx | sdague: there was an issue with the cross-check job and they all failed | 14:18 |
| ttx | sdague: also the cross-check job basically means they need to pass the tests twice in parallel to succeed, so that's a magnet for non-related test fails | 14:19 |
| dhellmann | I'll look at the merge conflict on 216710 | 14:19 |
| morgan | dhellmann: the keystineauth1 bit? | 14:21 |
| ttx | I'm adding +2s on those that seem sane to me, even if the tests are being rechecked | 14:21 |
| dhellmann | morgan: yeah, we have an automatic constraints update trying to change keystoneauth1==2.0 to keystoneauth1==1.0.0 | 14:21 |
| morgan | What? | 14:22 |
| dhellmann | yeah | 14:22 |
| morgan | Uhh | 14:22 |
| dhellmann | morgan: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/219568/ | 14:22 |
| morgan | So ksa1 should never exceed 2.0 | 14:22 |
| morgan | But whatever | 14:23 |
| morgan | Anyway. 1.0.0 should be fine | 14:23 |
| ttx | wow, mimic brings twisted ? what sort of a test framework is that | 14:23 |
| morgan | The name keystoneauth1 is correct. It is supposed to be named for the major/stable release | 14:23 |
| morgan | dhellmann: is that breaking jenkins somehow? | 14:25 |
| dhellmann | morgan: no, we were just confused about why the version # was going so far down and how it could have been working before | 14:25 |
| dhellmann | I guess if there is a constraint but no range in g-r.txt we ignore the constraint | 14:26 |
| morgan | We probably should make it >= 1.0.0 | 14:26 |
| morgan | Because pre 1.0 was beta and definitely wont work | 14:26 |
| sdague | fwiw, we've got a fix for the largeops job coming | 14:27 |
| ttx | sdague: cool -- how hard does it hit us ? | 14:28 |
| dhellmann | sdague: is that failing consistently, then? | 14:28 |
| nikhil_k | ttx: hi, thanks for tagging l-3. just wanted to bring to your notice that we've https://review.openstack.org/#/c/215709/ in pipe and will go in rc1 . Hope it doesn't bother people as it's experimental API anyways! | 14:29 |
| ttx | nikhil_k: ack | 14:29 |
| ttx | dhellmann: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/216710 - why is it not necessary ? (so that I know) | 14:29 |
| dhellmann | ttx: when I rebased it, there were no changes to merge | 14:30 |
| dhellmann | maybe I missed something, I'll look again | 14:30 |
| ttx | dhellmann: oh ok | 14:30 |
| jroll | ttx: mimic is literally an API server that mocks various openstack things | 14:30 |
| jroll | you can actually use HTTP calls against it | 14:31 |
| ttx | jroll: shouldn't that be in test-requirements ? | 14:31 |
| dhellmann | ttx: it looks ok now that david-lyle updated it | 14:31 |
| jroll | ttx: yes, don't test-requirements need to be in g-r? | 14:32 |
| sdague | ttx: it seems to be on some set of the failures | 14:32 |
| sdague | for requirements | 14:32 |
| sdague | I think it's about a 25% fail right now | 14:32 |
| ttx | sdague: ok, must be the one I noticed earlier | 14:33 |
| ttx | jroll: hmm | 14:34 |
| ttx | dhellmann: do you know if we add test requirements to global-requirements or some other file in openstack/requirements ? | 14:34 |
| dhellmann | iirc, everything goes into global-requirements.txt | 14:35 |
| dhellmann | ttx, sdague : I think those are all of the ones that are in a state to be approved right now | 14:37 |
| sdague | ttx: everything in g-r | 14:38 |
| ttx | dhellmann: shouold we recheck https://review.openstack.org/#/c/207678/1 ? | 14:38 |
| ttx | ok my bad | 14:38 |
| dhellmann | ttx: done | 14:39 |
| ttx | yeah, I think we are covered | 14:40 |
| ttx | dhellmann: You can probably approve https://review.openstack.org/#/c/219568/ and let it stall in tests if not ok | 14:41 |
| ttx | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/220268/ | 14:42 |
| ttx | and maybe ^ | 14:42 |
| dhellmann | ttx: cleaned up query https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/requirements+is:open+branch:master+NOT+label:Code-Review%253D-2+NOT+label:Workflow%253D-1,n,z | 14:42 |
| dhellmann | ttx: I expect merge conflicts on that, but we can resolve those | 14:42 |
| ttx | ack and we can say it's frozen / requires exceptions once we purged that backlog | 14:43 |
| ttx | dhellmann: if you +2/aprv https://review.openstack.org/#/c/220268/ we have our backlog full | 14:43 |
| ttx | I'll send an email to requirements-core warning about the freeze | 14:44 |
| dhellmann | ttx: do we want to add a new thing for functional tests right now? | 14:44 |
| dhellmann | I was mostly focusing on changes that updated versions of existing dependencies at this point | 14:45 |
| ttx | let me see when that was proposed | 14:45 |
| dhellmann | sep 3 | 14:45 |
| ttx | Sep 3.. yeah I guess that could be mitaka material | 14:45 |
| dhellmann | ok, I'll -2 it for now | 14:45 |
| sdague | probably should -2 all the WF -1 ones, people sometimes flip those bits when you don't expect them | 14:46 |
| dhellmann | good idea, I'll do that | 14:46 |
| ttx | https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/requirements+is:open+branch:master+label:Workflow%253D%252B1,n,z is our approved backlog | 14:46 |
| *** TravT has quit IRC | 14:48 | |
| ttx | hmm, maybe it's a good time for a requirements-core cleanup | 14:48 |
| * ttx looks up reveiw stats | 14:48 | |
| sdague | so, honestly, it's also probably time to abandon older stuff in there | 14:49 |
| sdague | because stuff is merge conflict after a couple of months | 14:49 |
| ttx | sdague: agreed.. it's just that jeblair freaks out when you abandon someone else's work | 14:50 |
| dhellmann | yeah, I can do that for anything older than what, july? | 14:50 |
| ttx | personally I'm all for the cleanup | 14:50 |
| dhellmann | I waffle on that point, but in this repo clarity of intent is important so I'm OK with doing it. | 14:50 |
| dhellmann | How old do we want to go? | 14:50 |
| sdague | older than july with a jenkins -1 | 14:50 |
| sdague | I think that's a fair criteria | 14:51 |
| ttx | ok, zul didn't do a single requirements review in liberty, I think he can be removed (won't even notice it) | 14:51 |
| dhellmann | sdague: what's the label search for jenkins -1? | 14:52 |
| sdague | label:Verified<=-1,jenkins | 14:52 |
| dhellmann | how's this for the list to be abandoned? https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/requirements+is:open+branch:master+label:Verified%253C%253D-1%252Cjenkins+age:1month,n,z | 14:53 |
| *** TravT has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 14:54 | |
| ttx | dhellmann: returns empty for me | 14:57 |
| dhellmann | well, I abandoned them all :-) | 14:57 |
| sdague | heh | 14:58 |
| dhellmann | we have several sort of old changes for kilo: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/requirements+is:open+NOT+branch:master,n,z | 14:58 |
| sdague | should this be kicked as well - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/201842/ | 14:59 |
| dhellmann | actually most of those are pretty recent, but they're still for kilo | 14:59 |
| dhellmann | yeah, that will be resubmitted by the bot if needed | 14:59 |
| sdague | should we abandon it, or will that break the world? | 14:59 |
| sdague | it seems weird to leave it out there in an unmerged state | 15:00 |
| dhellmann | I abandoned it | 15:00 |
| dhellmann | I assume the bot is smart enough to resubmit, or make a new one | 15:00 |
| ttx | dhellmann, sdague: do those guidelines make sense: http://paste.openstack.org/show/445485/ | 15:00 |
| dhellmann | nicely summarized | 15:01 |
| ttx | been going back and forth on the upper-contraints automated thing | 15:01 |
| dhellmann | we should put text like that in the readme for the repo so we can reuse it | 15:01 |
| ttx | but I think it's fine | 15:01 |
| sdague | I would leave adding things to projects.txt as in the OK bucket | 15:01 |
| sdague | so move line 12 -> 9 | 15:02 |
| sdague | otherwise, seems fine to me | 15:02 |
| ttx | sdague: that's fine by me | 15:02 |
| ttx | dhellmann: ? | 15:02 |
| dhellmann | wfm | 15:02 |
| dhellmann | they're only risk in that they can break the auto-update job sometimes if we don't notice that they don't have the check-requirements job | 15:02 |
| dhellmann | I should try again to automate that | 15:03 |
| ttx | ok sent | 15:03 |
| ttx | cc you | 15:03 |
| ttx | ok, I think we have this requirements thing under control. Thanks guys | 15:04 |
| dhellmann | whew | 15:05 |
| dhellmann | ok, I'm going to run an errand, bbiab (~1hr) | 15:05 |
| ttx | ok, if I don't see you again, have a good labor day | 15:05 |
| dhellmann | ttx: it might be worth sending a similar email to the -dev list so folks know what to expect if they submit requirements reviews | 15:05 |
| * ttx will use his Monday to finish up the successbot | 15:05 | |
| dhellmann | ttx: thanks, have a good weekend! | 15:05 |
| ttx | dhellmann: I kinda did with the l3 announcement pointing to https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/DepFreeze | 15:06 |
| dhellmann | ah, true | 15:06 |
| ttx | I'll update the wiki with what's in the email | 15:06 |
| ttx | since it's a bit outdated | 15:06 |
| *** sigmavirus24 is now known as sigmavirus24_awa | 15:13 | |
| *** armax has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 15:26 | |
| notmyname | ttx: dhellmann: I saw some references overnight.... today i'm working on anything final for the next python-swiftclient release | 15:29 |
| notmyname | ttx: dhellmann: is monday too late to send a patch for a release? does it have to be done today? | 15:30 |
| notmyname | (I can probably make either work) | 15:30 |
| ttx | notmyname: great. We need one relatively recent to cut the stable/liberty branch from | 15:30 |
| ttx | monday is fine, we are a bit late | 15:30 |
| ttx | and monday is labor day so I don't expect much movement | 15:30 |
| notmyname | ok. there's one more I want to land today/this weekend (to move to a manual authors/changelog like swift does). I'll sent the release patch asap | 15:31 |
| notmyname | oh yeah | 15:31 |
| notmyname | fun that a non-american is reminding me about US holidays ;-) | 15:31 |
| ttx | notmyname: I'm on a weird holiday schedule | 15:49 |
| nikhil_k | ttx: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/203242/ -- would that be something workable for rc1 ? | 16:29 |
| dhellmann | jroll: that plan for ironic releases sounds sensible | 16:46 |
| jroll | dhellmann: cool, I'mma do it then :) | 16:47 |
| dhellmann | jroll: ++ | 16:47 |
| openstackgerrit | Morgan Fainberg proposed openstack/releases: Release 1.7.0 of keystoneclient https://review.openstack.org/220584 | 16:49 |
| *** sigmavirus24_awa is now known as sigmavirus24 | 16:49 | |
| morgan | dhellmann: ^ i meant to publish that yesterday | 16:49 |
| morgan | dhellmann: but my laptop crashed and i didn't resubmit.. was confused why that hadn't shown up on the gerrit page | 16:49 |
| morgan | :P | 16:49 |
| dhellmann | morgan: I thought I remembered you saying you were going to do it, and then it didn't show up and I thought you might have something you were waiting for | 16:50 |
| morgan | nope | 16:50 |
| dhellmann | ok, I'll take care of it today | 16:50 |
| morgan | no rush from my side :P | 16:50 |
| morgan | but yeah. yeesh :P | 16:50 |
| morgan | stupid laptop crash | 16:50 |
| *** openstackgerrit_ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 17:02 | |
| *** dims has quit IRC | 17:03 | |
| dhellmann | morgan: that release leaves out 2 changes, was that your intent? http://logs.openstack.org/84/220584/1/check/gate-releases-tox-list-changes/932bd22/console.html | 17:07 |
| dhellmann | better link: http://logs.openstack.org/84/220584/1/check/gate-releases-tox-list-changes/932bd22/console.html#_2015-09-04_16_58_33_775 | 17:07 |
| morgan | dhellmann: oh must have 2 more landed since i did that | 17:08 |
| morgan | no. | 17:08 |
| dhellmann | k | 17:08 |
| morgan | let me respin. | 17:08 |
| openstackgerrit | Morgan Fainberg proposed openstack/releases: Release 1.7.0 of keystoneclient https://review.openstack.org/220584 | 17:09 |
| morgan | dhellmann: , ^ | 17:09 |
| dhellmann | morgan: ack | 17:10 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases: Release 1.7.0 of keystoneclient https://review.openstack.org/220584 | 17:19 |
| *** dims has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 17:21 | |
| *** dims_ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 17:21 | |
| *** dims_ is now known as dimsum__ | 17:23 | |
| *** dims has quit IRC | 17:25 | |
| openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/releases: Release python-novaclient 2.28.1 https://review.openstack.org/220604 | 17:58 |
| openstackgerrit | Kyle Mestery proposed openstack/releases: python-neutronclient: Release version 2.6.1 https://review.openstack.org/220606 | 18:04 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases: Release python-novaclient 2.28.1 https://review.openstack.org/220604 | 18:38 |
| dhellmann | mestery: did you see my comments on https://review.openstack.org/220606 | 18:44 |
| openstackgerrit | Kyle Mestery proposed openstack/releases: python-neutronclient: Release version 3.0.0 https://review.openstack.org/220606 | 19:03 |
| mestery | dhellmann: I did, and I just pushed ^^^ to address them. Thanks for the help! | 19:03 |
| mestery | dhellmann: I agree with you on the need for a 3.0.0 version given the backwards incompatible changes we made | 19:04 |
| dhellmann | mestery: I hesitate to release backwards-incompatible changes before a 3 day weekend. Tuesday? | 19:04 |
| mestery | dhellmann: I am +1000 on that idea, lets hold off. | 19:05 |
| mestery | :) | 19:05 |
| dhellmann | ok, I'l go ahead and WIP it | 19:05 |
| sdague | dhellmann: how full of rage will you be if I kick out the upper contraints change? | 19:20 |
| sdague | because everything behind it on ceph is failing | 19:21 |
| sdague | dhellmann: ok, well I kicked it, this was about to wedge nova, glance, cinder for the long weekend | 19:25 |
| dhellmann | sdague: not a big deal, I sort of expected merge conflicts with that one anyway | 19:26 |
| sdague | yeh, it wasn't merge conflicts | 19:27 |
| dhellmann | sdague: were those changes causing ceph failures, then? | 19:27 |
| sdague | well, the debug is still happening | 19:27 |
| dhellmann | ok | 19:27 |
| dhellmann | yeah, I would much rather we just manually update the things we know we want to change at this point | 19:27 |
| dhellmann | because I'm not entirely certain we have enough test jobs tied to that repo to expose issues like the one you seem to be encountering | 19:27 |
| sdague | hmmm... it appears that upper-constraints may have completely invalidated all our library forward testing - http://logs.openstack.org/20/220320/1/check/gate-tempest-dsvm-full-ceph-src-glance_store/83b8b59/logs/devstacklog.txt.gz#_2015-09-04_13_51_33_905 | 19:32 |
| sdague | it's friday, so just need to call it a day. However that seems to indicate that all our library testing is no longer happening because upper-constraints trumps it | 19:34 |
| dhellmann | sdague: is that a gate job for the library? | 19:34 |
| sdague | yep | 19:35 |
| dhellmann | oh, yeah, I see that in the url now | 19:35 |
| dhellmann | wow, ok | 19:35 |
| sdague | that has correctly specified libs_from_source | 19:35 |
| dhellmann | lifeless: ^^ | 19:35 |
| dhellmann | I wonder if glance-store is special because of the dash | 19:35 |
| dhellmann | like some pattern match thing isn't working | 19:35 |
| sdague | I can find another example and see | 19:35 |
| dhellmann | because I swear I remember at some point specifically seeing a place where we remove the lib under test from the constraints | 19:36 |
| sdague | it might be | 19:37 |
| sdague | http://logs.openstack.org/07/216707/3/check/gate-tempest-dsvm-neutron-src-python-glanceclient/c01da5f/logs/pip-freeze.txt.gz glanceclient seems fine | 19:38 |
| dhellmann | yeah, the name of the thing according to setuptools in the glance_store repo is "glance_store" but the constraints file has "glance-store" | 19:39 |
| sdague | ok | 19:40 |
| dhellmann | pypi translates glance-store to glance_store transparently | 19:40 |
| dhellmann | I'll update the constraints file | 19:40 |
| sdague | ok, cool | 19:40 |
| sdague | we also still know that the new glance_store is bad, but hopefully that will expose it back on glance_store jobs | 19:40 |
| dhellmann | sdague: https://review.openstack.org/220648 | 19:42 |
| *** mriedem has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 19:43 | |
| mriedem | roar! | 19:43 |
| * dhellmann cowers from mriedem | 19:43 | |
| mriedem | ha | 19:43 |
| sdague | dhellmann: ok, I'm going to fast +A that, because it's very straight forward, and the current behavior is obviously wrong | 19:43 |
| dhellmann | sdague: wfm | 19:43 |
| sdague | dhellmann: thanks for getting to the bottom of that. I'm going to call it a weekend for real. enjoy it | 19:45 |
| dhellmann | sdague: have a good weekend, tty tuesday | 19:45 |
| mriedem | would be nice if the glance channel wasn't dead when you say the gate is broken in there | 19:46 |
| dhellmann | mriedem: it seems glance is succumbing to a tragedy of the commons problem lately | 19:47 |
| *** openstackgerrit_ has quit IRC | 20:03 | |
| *** openstackgerrit_ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 20:04 | |
| *** gordc has quit IRC | 20:08 | |
| *** sigmavirus24 is now known as sigmavirus24_awa | 20:11 | |
| *** devananda has quit IRC | 20:16 | |
| *** devananda has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 20:16 | |
| *** sigmavirus24_awa is now known as sigmavirus24 | 20:25 | |
| mriedem | block glance-store 0.9.0 in g-r I31ba6473fc2be9e45783c71728f2529ca26b2691 | 20:34 |
| mriedem | oops | 20:34 |
| mriedem | https://review.openstack.org/220657 | 20:34 |
| dhellmann | +2a | 20:35 |
| dhellmann | I'm going to disappear for the weekend now | 20:35 |
| mriedem | thanks, later | 20:36 |
| *** mriedem has left #openstack-relmgr-office | 20:37 | |
| *** openstackgerrit_ has quit IRC | 20:47 | |
| *** openstackgerrit_ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 20:48 | |
| *** openstackgerrit_ has quit IRC | 20:48 | |
| *** openstackgerrit_ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 20:49 | |
| *** openstackgerrit_ has quit IRC | 20:53 | |
| *** HenryG has quit IRC | 21:07 | |
| *** devananda has quit IRC | 21:09 | |
| *** bdemers has quit IRC | 21:09 | |
| *** HenryG has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 21:11 | |
| lifeless | sdague: dhellmann: sorry, playing catchup. Whats up ? | 21:11 |
| *** devananda has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 21:16 | |
| *** bdemers has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 21:21 | |
| *** dims_ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 21:43 | |
| *** dimsum__ has quit IRC | 21:47 | |
| *** dims_ has quit IRC | 21:48 | |
| *** sigmavirus24 is now known as sigmavirus24_awa | 22:12 | |
| *** dimsum__ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 23:52 | |
| *** dimsum__ has quit IRC | 23:52 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!