| thingee | ttx: slowest build...3 hours later :) | 00:00 |
|---|---|---|
| *** nikhil_k is now known as nikhil_k-afk | 00:48 | |
| *** flaper87 has quit IRC | 01:27 | |
| *** flaper87 has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 01:28 | |
| *** flaper87 has quit IRC | 01:33 | |
| *** flaper87 has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 01:39 | |
| *** asalkeld is now known as asalkeld_lunch | 03:27 | |
| *** david-ly_ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 06:01 | |
| *** david-lyle has quit IRC | 06:03 | |
| ttx | fungi: thx for the heads-up! | 06:57 |
| ttx | Kiall: for Designate, we are missing... backport for https://review.openstack.org/#/c/176189/ , backport for https://review.openstack.org/#/c/176340/ , and decision whether https://bugs.launchpad.net/designate/+bug/1447683 should be fixed for RC2 or not | 07:15 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1447683 in Designate "/v2/zones is missing the nameservers sub resource" [Critical,Fix committed] - Assigned to Graham Hayes (grahamhayes) | 07:15 |
| Kiall | ttx - humm 2 back ports I'll look at in a couple. The extra bug, yea, I mentioned it here later last night as one last one... | 07:33 |
| ttx | Kiall: so I should add it to RC2 ? | 07:36 |
| Kiall | Yes, please :) | 07:36 |
| ttx | Kiall: ok doing that now | 07:36 |
| Kiall | I'll be at a laptop in 30 mins and can sort the other 2 backports out. | 07:36 |
| *** asalkeld_lunch has left #openstack-relmgr-office | 07:42 | |
| *** zz_johnthetubagu is now known as johnthetubaguy | 07:51 | |
| Kiall | ttx: backport of one here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/177107/ and the other here https://review.openstack.org/177111 | 07:55 |
| Kiall | ttx: also, proposal bot gave us this.. not sure anymore if we should land it? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/173978/ | 07:55 |
| ttx | Kiall: you should, otherwise first project to require designateclient might break the world | 07:57 |
| Kiall | Okay, perfect :) | 07:57 |
| ttx | It's basically to make sure all stable/kilo testing uses consistent deps | 07:57 |
| Kiall | On it's way in.. Thanks :) | 07:57 |
| * Kiall loves this gate at time of the morning .. everything get's a test slave straight away ;) | 07:59 | |
| Kiall | ttx: Okay, last two backports passed the check queue and just need their +A :) | 08:19 |
| ttx | on it | 08:28 |
| ttx | Kiall: about https://bugs.launchpad.net/designate/+bug/1445123 | 08:28 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1445123 in Designate kilo "Under high load, DB Connection Pool get's exhausted" [High,In progress] - Assigned to Kiall Mac Innes (kiall) | 08:28 |
| ttx | fixed is marked "partial" | 08:29 |
| ttx | can we consider this bug fixed by it ? Or open a separate bug for what's left ? | 08:29 |
| Kiall | ttx: ah yes, I had intended on a better fix, but it involves too much re-work so we settled for a change that fixes under all but the worst load :) | 08:30 |
| ttx | ok, will mark bug fixed then | 08:30 |
| ttx | now if only LP wouldn't timeout | 08:32 |
| Kiall | One day, we'll get JIRA to moan about ;) | 08:34 |
| Kiall | And - All changes have landed :) Should we pull the trigger, or give it the rest of the day just in case? | 09:09 |
| ttx | flaper87: ping me when around | 10:04 |
| ttx | Kiall: hojw about we pull trigger in a couple of hours if things stil look good ? | 10:05 |
| *** flaper87 has quit IRC | 10:05 | |
| *** flaper87 has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 10:05 | |
| ttx | flaper87: around? | 10:08 |
| flaper87 | ttx: I am | 10:09 |
| ttx | flaper87: looking intop a Zaqar RC2 to include https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/zaqar+branch:stable/kilo,n,z | 10:09 |
| ttx | anything you'd like to add ? | 10:10 |
| flaper87 | nope, I'll approve those 2 and we're good to go | 10:10 |
| Kiall | ttx: sounds good to me | 10:10 |
| ttx | flaper87: sounds good, I'll make it happen | 10:11 |
| sdague | morning ttx, let me know if there is anything I can help with on the release or un thaw today | 11:34 |
| sdague | ttx: you want to unblock your requirements -2s at this point? | 11:38 |
| sdague | I flushed out mine yesterday | 11:38 |
| ttx | sdague: ack | 11:40 |
| ttx | sdague: We need to decide if we announce requirement unfreeze, and also if we clear the few stable/kilo libs that wanted to release | 11:40 |
| ttx | After that I think we are good | 11:40 |
| ttx | flushing my -2s now | 11:41 |
| ttx | sdague: you still have one @ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/150138/ | 11:42 |
| sdague | so, I think there are 2 bandit proposes | 11:42 |
| sdague | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/167126/ and https://review.openstack.org/#/c/150138/ | 11:43 |
| sdague | I guess I should -2 the newer one and unblock the older one | 11:43 |
| sdague | it would have been nice if the security team had talked to each other about that :) | 11:43 |
| ttx | at least renew the -2 justification message | 11:43 |
| ttx | sdague, dhellmann: so I'd say that we wait for the last RC2s (should be done in a couple of hours) and announce requirements and library release unfreeze | 11:45 |
| ttx | so that we can get oslo.messaging and the keystone libs a kilo point release | 11:46 |
| sdague | ok | 11:46 |
| sdague | honestly, I let a couple of things go through yesterday that should be fine for master | 11:46 |
| ttx | sdague: on the release front, mostly concerned with https://bugs.launchpad.net/oslo-incubator/+bug/1446583 | 11:46 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1446583 in oslo-incubator "services no longer reliably stop in stable/kilo" [Critical,Fix committed] - Assigned to Julien Danjou (jdanjou) | 11:46 |
| ttx | sdague: is the final call there to work around it in grenade ? | 11:47 |
| ttx | or still being discussed ? | 11:47 |
| ttx | Kiall: I'll proceed with Designate RC2 now unless you scream | 11:51 |
| sdague | ttx: we put a hack into stable/kilo devstack | 11:51 |
| sdague | where we always shutdown servers with "kill; sleep 1; kill" | 11:52 |
| ttx | should we kill the stable/kilo proposed backport ? | 11:52 |
| sdague | we still want that in stable/kilo | 11:52 |
| sdague | it can wait until the release | 11:52 |
| sdague | we're also going to need to have something in the release notes acknowledging that kill SERVICE may not stop that service | 11:53 |
| ttx | ok good | 11:53 |
| sdague | but testing is unblocked | 11:54 |
| sdague | I want to remove the work around in devstack as soon as we can | 11:54 |
| sdague | fyi - this requirements file reorg might be useful - https://review.openstack.org/177193 | 11:54 |
| ttx | flaper87: zaqar RC2 up @ https://launchpad.net/zaqar/+milestone/kilo-rc2 | 11:58 |
| ttx | Kiall: designate RC2 up @ | 12:00 |
| ttx | https://launchpad.net/designate/+milestone/kilo-rc2 | 12:01 |
| ttx | thingee, david-ly_ nikhil_k: ping me when you wake up | 13:08 |
| Kiall | ttx: excellent :) | 13:15 |
| mestery | ttx: A new security issue (DoS against Neutron DHCP agent) was filed 10 hours ago. I think we may need an RC3 for this: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1447883 | 13:36 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1447883 in neutron "Restrict netmask of CIDR to avoid DHCP resync is not enough" [Undecided,In progress] - Assigned to Kevin Benton (kevinbenton) | 13:36 |
| ttx | mestery: itmay | 13:37 |
| mestery | ttx: We're goign to land the master patch and get a backport up just in case | 13:38 |
| ttx | yes | 13:38 |
| ttx | fungi, sdague: updated https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Branch_Model to match new stable/* usage | 13:47 |
| nikhil_k-afk | ttx: hi | 13:50 |
| *** nikhil_k-afk is now known as nikhil_k | 13:51 | |
| fungi | ttx: awesome, i meant to ask if we should. likely infra-manual needs some tweaks to remove references to "proposed" | 13:52 |
| fungi | i'll put together a patch in a bit | 13:52 |
| *** johnthetubaguy is now known as zz_johnthetubagu | 13:52 | |
| *** dansmith is now known as superdan | 13:59 | |
| ttx | nikhil_k: I think we are good for RC2 | 14:03 |
| ttx | nikhil_k: all targeted bugs fixes merged | 14:04 |
| nikhil_k | ttx: ok, how open are we for RC3 possibility if something comes up by Mon? | 14:04 |
| nikhil_k | ttx: I understand that you have been very busy and rc3 might be a big pain | 14:05 |
| nikhil_k | ttx: however, I wanted to set the right expectations with folks so trying to get early feedback | 14:05 |
| ttx | nikhil_k: we can still do a RC3 next week if something we can't fix post-release appears | 14:05 |
| ttx | If it's a "regular bug" it will wait until after release | 14:06 |
| nikhil_k | sounds good | 14:06 |
| nikhil_k | ttx: not a regular one, but there was some discussion that did not fan out for rc3 yet | 14:06 |
| nikhil_k | pan out* | 14:06 |
| ttx | nikhil_k: At this point we hope RC2 will be good enough. If something comes up we'll reassess | 14:07 |
| nikhil_k | sure | 14:07 |
| ttx | in all cases the thing would need to be fixed in master first | 14:07 |
| nikhil_k | ttx: about the py-client | 14:07 |
| nikhil_k | right | 14:07 |
| nikhil_k | can we bump the req to 0.17.1 (I need to check if not done already) | 14:07 |
| ttx | nikhil_k: we'd rather not -- we'll document the recommended min version though in the release notes | 14:08 |
| nikhil_k | ttx: this one https://review.openstack.org/#/c/174773/ | 14:08 |
| nikhil_k | ttx: can you please comment there? I seem to be the bottleneck in this communication | 14:09 |
| nikhil_k | this == lib release schedule | 14:09 |
| ttx | I fully agree on Doug's -2 there | 14:09 |
| nikhil_k | Stuart is pressing on it | 14:09 |
| nikhil_k | ok, just a agree would suffice :) | 14:09 |
| nikhil_k | please :) | 14:09 |
| ttx | done | 14:10 |
| nikhil_k | Thanks! | 14:10 |
| ttx | cutting Glance rc2 now | 14:10 |
| nikhil_k | nice | 14:10 |
| nikhil_k | Hope nothing was affected by the py-client release. Should I be aware of anything if it did? | 14:12 |
| ttx | nikhil_k: nope it went well | 14:13 |
| nikhil_k | cool | 14:13 |
| ttx | we'll likely unblock the others once I'm done with RC2s | 14:13 |
| ttx | thingee, david-ly_ ping me when around | 14:13 |
| nikhil_k | ttx: unblock whom/what ? | 14:14 |
| nikhil_k | are other RC2s waiting on Glance? | 14:14 |
| ttx | nikhil_k: library releases | 14:14 |
| nikhil_k | ok | 14:14 |
| nikhil_k | for a sec, I went wat | 14:15 |
| ttx | glance done | 14:15 |
| nikhil_k | ttx: .awesome. | 14:15 |
| nikhil_k | Have a great day! | 14:15 |
| ttx | you too! | 14:17 |
| *** zz_johnthetubagu is now known as johnthetubaguy | 14:20 | |
| ttx | dhellmann: around? | 14:30 |
| ttx | redrobot: ping | 14:51 |
| redrobot | ttx pong | 14:51 |
| ttx | redrobot: so we seem to have a hard time merging stuff | 14:51 |
| redrobot | ttx yeah, one of our contributors is looking at the intermittent failures | 14:52 |
| redrobot | ttx I suspect is a problem with a specific version of openssl | 14:52 |
| ttx | Be that https://review.openstack.org/#/c/176071/ or https://review.openstack.org/#/c/176860/ | 14:52 |
| ttx | redrobot: we'll probably have to delay Barbican RC2 to Monday | 14:52 |
| * ttx will try to stay away from OpenSTack this weekend | 14:52 | |
| redrobot | ttx fine by me. I'll be poking at those failures as well. Hopefully we can get them sorted out today. | 14:53 |
| ttx | redrobot: that would be swell. If a fix is necessary for stable/kilo for it to pass more reliably, you can propose it thezre. I'll pick it up and merge it on Monday morning | 14:53 |
| dhellmann | ttx: here | 15:02 |
| ttx | dhellmann: we're about to unfreeze libs and requirements | 15:04 |
| ttx | dhellmann: and therefore closing the-big-thaw | 15:04 |
| dhellmann | \o/ | 15:04 |
| ttx | dhellmann: any last thoughts ? | 15:04 |
| ttx | dhellmann: I think we'll do external dep capping after release | 15:04 |
| ttx | not sure I'm ready to take risks there | 15:05 |
| dhellmann | agreed | 15:05 |
| dhellmann | I've had enough fun this week | 15:05 |
| ttx | sdague was supportive of the "unfreeze now" | 15:05 |
| ttx | I'd like to cut the last RC2s before | 15:05 |
| ttx | so waiting on david-ly_ and thingee | 15:05 |
| dhellmann | I think we're ready to open liberty up, and I can spend some time reviewing req changes today, although it might be better to wait for monday | 15:06 |
| ttx | Unfreezing doesn't mean "approving all" | 15:06 |
| sdague | dhellmann: yeh, so I undid all my -2s | 15:06 |
| dhellmann | yeah | 15:06 |
| sdague | then did real reviews | 15:06 |
| dhellmann | sdague: I noticed a flurry of email from gerrit | 15:06 |
| ttx | It's just thawed, not hot yet | 15:06 |
| sdague | I did approve a couple that had +2 on them already that seemed safe | 15:06 |
| ttx | same for lib releases. We can unblock them, but I'd encourage people to not release on Friday | 15:06 |
| dhellmann | yeah, let's wait to mention that they are unblocked until monday just to be safe | 15:07 |
| sdague | yeh, mtreinish is asking about tempest-lib atm | 15:07 |
| ttx | So I will wait for the last two RC2s, then send an email about DepFreeze end and unleash libs | 15:07 |
| dhellmann | ++ | 15:07 |
| sdague | ttx: or not send the email until monday | 15:07 |
| sdague | we can soft unfreeze today | 15:07 |
| ttx | sdague: well, I feel guilty of having overrun the DepFreeze mandate already | 15:08 |
| ttx | was supposed to be unfrozen weeks ago. But I can see the argument | 15:08 |
| ttx | I can send it Monday morning | 15:08 |
| thingee | ttx: I'll be at the office in 15 minutes to look. | 15:10 |
| ttx | thingee: noted | 15:10 |
| dhellmann | ttx: I'm going afk for an errand, bbiab | 15:11 |
| ttx | dhellmann: wasn't nitpicking on this commit message on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/173919/, was nitpicking on *that* one | 15:12 |
| ttx | dhellmann: sorry for the confusion in nitpicking | 15:12 |
| * ttx doesn't nitpick on comit messages, only on commit messages. | 15:12 | |
| sdague | or comet messages | 15:12 |
| dhellmann | ttx: ah, I wondered :-) | 15:13 |
| ttx | david-ly_: I think I'll tag Horizon RC2 in the coming 30 minutes. Scream if you don't agree | 15:20 |
| david-ly_ | ttx: agree | 15:22 |
| *** david-ly_ is now known as david-lyle | 15:22 | |
| ttx | I'll tag now then | 15:23 |
| ttx | horizon rc2 on its way | 15:23 |
| david-lyle | \o/ | 15:23 |
| ttx | it's done, will announce together with Cinder | 15:30 |
| ttx | once thingee arrives in office and gives me the signoff | 15:30 |
| thingee | ttx: hi | 15:31 |
| thingee | ttx: looking | 15:31 |
| ttx | From where I stand, all targeted things are in | 15:31 |
| ttx | thingee: there is https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1446954 | 15:32 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1446954 in Cinder "upload_volume_to_image --force ignores fact that a volume is already attached" [Undecided,Fix committed] - Assigned to John Griffith (john-griffith) | 15:32 |
| ttx | but that could be post-released | 15:32 |
| thingee | ttx: introduces a config opt | 15:33 |
| thingee | looking closer | 15:34 |
| ttx | arh, my weekend is now in jeopardy | 15:34 |
| thingee | ttx: yeah this is a valid bug. | 15:41 |
| ttx | sure, how critical is it though ? This also impacts doc | 15:41 |
| ttx | i.e. is this a regression ? | 15:42 |
| thingee | this has existed for some releases back according to the commit message | 15:42 |
| ttx | or did we live with it happily for the last year | 15:42 |
| thingee | it's all drivers except lvm that have this issue. but yeah we've been fine for a while with this | 15:43 |
| ttx | this fix breaks so many freezes I would accept it only if it is critical | 15:44 |
| thingee | ok, it's not. | 15:44 |
| thingee | it can be avoided by not passing a force flag | 15:44 |
| ttx | ok, let's document it | 15:45 |
| ttx | in release notes | 15:45 |
| ttx | as a known issue | 15:45 |
| * thingee updates release notes | 15:45 | |
| ttx | and tag RC2 | 15:45 |
| ttx | thingee: anything else on the balance ? | 15:45 |
| thingee | nothing else has been raised to me. I've checked the cinder channel log as well | 15:46 |
| * thingee checks new bugs one last time | 15:46 | |
| ttx | key word at this point is "regression" :) | 15:47 |
| ttx | though I might also consider "security", "data loss" and "terrorism" | 15:48 |
| thingee | ttx: ok LGTM | 15:48 |
| thingee | hurry before I change my mind! :P | 15:49 |
| * thingee is just another one of the cats in the herd | 15:49 | |
| ttx | it's tagged already | 15:50 |
| ttx | just waiting on tarball now | 15:50 |
| ttx | I'm faster than cats | 15:50 |
| thingee | ttx: enjoy your weekend and thanks for all your work on coordinating everything. | 15:52 |
| ttx | np! Happy to leave for the weekend with a clean slate | 15:53 |
| ttx | last weekend was not exactly that | 15:53 |
| ttx | OK, I'll call it a week and stop early for a change :) | 15:59 |
| ttx | Talk to you all on Monday | 15:59 |
| morganfainberg | ttx: enjoy the weekend! | 16:52 |
| *** johnthetubaguy is now known as zz_johnthetubagu | 18:15 | |
| *** gordc has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 19:55 | |
| *** bknudson has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 19:55 | |
| dhellmann | gordc: so tell me a little about what you're trying for, so I understand what we're doing | 19:55 |
| bknudson | see if I can find the m/l thread... | 19:55 |
| bknudson | http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-April/062115.html | 19:56 |
| gordc | rough summary is pycadf <0.7.0 is bringing in oslo.messaging as a requirement... but it should really be a test-requirement since it's not mandatory. | 19:57 |
| * dhellmann waits for his browser to stop beach-balling | 19:57 | |
| gordc | i think because it's mandatory it's bringing in a bunch of other dependencies. | 19:57 |
| dhellmann | ok, I guess dropping a requirement is less of an issue than adding one | 19:57 |
| bknudson | also, here's the keystonemiddleware change that's failing: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/173123/ | 19:58 |
| dhellmann | hmm, how did this work before? | 19:59 |
| dhellmann | or has it been broken for a while? | 19:59 |
| bknudson | we just created the keystonemiddleware stable/juno branch | 20:00 |
| bknudson | and then I was working through other issues with it. | 20:00 |
| bknudson | dhellmann: unless you were wondering about something else that worked? | 20:01 |
| dhellmann | bknudson: so creating the juno branch for keystonemiddleware uncovered this? | 20:01 |
| bknudson | dhellmann: well, the stable/juno branch never worked since it was created. | 20:02 |
| dhellmann | does this show up in other juno branches? | 20:02 |
| dhellmann | ok | 20:02 |
| bknudson | who else uses pycadf? | 20:02 |
| dhellmann | in kilo, http://paste.openstack.org/show/205793/ | 20:03 |
| bknudson | also, keystonemiddleware has oslo.messaging in test-requirements.txt and pycadf in requirements.txt | 20:03 |
| bknudson | and pip resolver seems to really have an issue when they're in separate files. | 20:04 |
| dhellmann | and keystonemiddleware doesn't depend on oslo.messaging? | 20:04 |
| gordc | dhellmann: we moved the audit middleware to keystonemiddleware.. it's optional | 20:05 |
| gordc | bknudson: unless there's somethign else using it. | 20:05 |
| bknudson | keystonemiddleware/tests/test_audit_middleware.py:@mock.patch('oslo.messaging.get_transport', mock.MagicMock()) | 20:05 |
| bknudson | That's where keystonemiddleware requirement on oslo.messaging comes from so it's in test-requirements.txt | 20:06 |
| bknudson | in some ways you could say pycadf is optional since audit middleware is optional... | 20:06 |
| bknudson | but we never handled it that way | 20:06 |
| bknudson | keystonemiddleware/audit.py: self._notifier = oslo.messaging.Notifier( | 20:07 |
| bknudson | wait a minute... oslo.messaging is also not just in the tests. | 20:07 |
| bknudson | oh, but it's on optional import. | 20:07 |
| bknudson | http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/keystonemiddleware/tree/keystonemiddleware/audit.py?h=stable/juno#n28 | 20:08 |
| bknudson | so it should be in test-requirements.txt | 20:08 |
| bknudson | I had proposed other changes to move pycadf into test-requirements.txt or to move oslo.messaging into requirements.txt. | 20:09 |
| bknudson | either of those would also resolve the issue. | 20:09 |
| bknudson | and then we wouldn't need a stable/juno branch of pycadf. | 20:10 |
| gordc | bknudson: i'd probably choose the former. | 20:10 |
| bknudson | at least for this issue. | 20:10 |
| dhellmann | it's ok to create the branch, I'm just trying to make sure I understand the whole goal | 20:10 |
| gordc | but i think we should probably have stable/juno for pycadf regardless of everything. | 20:10 |
| dhellmann | so keystonemiddleware uses pycadf and pycdf uses oslo.messaging? | 20:11 |
| dhellmann | but keystonemiddleware doesn't use oslo.messaging directly? | 20:11 |
| dhellmann | gordc, bknudson: ^^ | 20:12 |
| bknudson | dhellmann: keystonemiddleware doesn't use oslo.messaging directly, and actually it's explicitly an optional import. | 20:13 |
| dhellmann | ok | 20:13 |
| bknudson | the only use of oslo.messaging is in the tests. | 20:13 |
| bknudson | pycadf uses oslo.messaging, but apparently that's optional too. | 20:14 |
| dhellmann | and how about pycadf? | 20:14 |
| bknudson | but even though it's optional pycadf has it in requirements.txt | 20:14 |
| bknudson | at least in that release. | 20:14 |
| gordc | dhellmann: it's in pycadf because we needed a placeholder for middleware when we moved it out of oslo-incubator | 20:14 |
| dhellmann | ah, right, and where is that middleware now? | 20:15 |
| gordc | it's in pycadf's test-requirements from >=0.7.0 | 20:15 |
| gordc | the middleware is in keystonemiddleware... (and being dropped in pycadf 1.x) https://review.openstack.org/#/c/176969/ | 20:16 |
| dhellmann | ok, I think I'm caught up | 20:16 |
| gordc | :) | 20:16 |
| dhellmann | so creating a stable/juno for pycadf at 0.6.0 will let you release 0.6.1 with oslo.messaging moved to test-requirements.txt | 20:16 |
| dhellmann | and that more accurately reflects the real requirements for the lib at that point | 20:16 |
| gordc | dhellmann: yep. | 20:17 |
| gordc | bknudson: sound good? | 20:17 |
| bknudson | gordc: yes. | 20:18 |
| bknudson | I think that'll fix keystonemiddleware | 20:18 |
| bknudson | because then oslo.messaging won't be installed by requirements.txt processing. | 20:18 |
| bknudson | only by test-requirements.txt | 20:19 |
| dhellmann | gordc: https://review.openstack.org/177436 | 20:19 |
| dhellmann | branch is done, that change will fix up the .gitreview file for you | 20:19 |
| gordc | dhellmann: cool cool. thanks! | 20:19 |
| gordc | bknudson: ok if i cut 0.6.1 on monday? | 20:20 |
| dhellmann | yes, please don't release anything today :-) | 20:20 |
| gordc | dhellmann: :) you don't like when i release things and disappear for the weekend? | 20:20 |
| bknudson | gordc: yep, all I should need to do is recheck when it's released. | 20:20 |
| dhellmann | gordc: as long as my name isn't attached, and I don't have to fix it... | 20:20 |
| gordc | haha cool cool | 20:21 |
| gordc | will do it monday. thanks again dhellmann | 20:21 |
| bknudson | if a release of a stable branch causes things to break we are really messed up. | 20:21 |
| dhellmann | np, thanks for walking through it all with me to make sure I had it clear | 20:21 |
| dhellmann | bknudson: true, but you'd be surprised | 20:21 |
| bknudson | just don't call it 6.0.1 or something! | 20:21 |
| gordc | bknudson: too much pressure now :\ | 20:22 |
| gordc | bknudson: i'll ping you monday when i've release. | 20:22 |
| bknudson | gordc: you going to post the review? | 20:22 |
| bknudson | at least do that today then we can see if jenkins works at all. | 20:23 |
| gordc | bknudson: done. | 20:23 |
| * gordc switches back to #os-keystone | 20:24 | |
| *** gordc has left #openstack-relmgr-office | 20:24 | |
| bknudson | https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/pycadf+branch:stable/juno,n,z ? | 20:24 |
| mestery | ttx: This one is ready for Neutron RC3: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1447883 | 21:28 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1447883 in OpenStack Security Advisory "Restrict netmask of CIDR to avoid DHCP resync is not enough" [Undecided,New] | 21:28 |
| mestery | ttx: Given it's a security issue, I think we need to role this for an RC3. | 21:28 |
| *** bknudson has quit IRC | 21:49 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!