| *** david-lyle has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 00:11 | |
| *** david-lyle has quit IRC | 00:17 | |
| *** markwash__ has quit IRC | 01:00 | |
| *** markwash__ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 05:21 | |
| *** flaper87|afk is now known as flaper87 | 06:49 | |
| ttx | dolphm: I can do the rubberstamping | 06:50 |
|---|---|---|
| ttx | nikhil_k: adding the juno-rc-potential to it, needs to land in master first anyway | 06:51 |
| ttx | mikal: going to the post office for 10min, should be back for our 1:1 | 07:48 |
| *** markwash__ has quit IRC | 07:50 | |
| ttx | mikal: around? | 08:03 |
| *** zz_johnthetubagu is now known as johnthetubaguy | 08:25 | |
| ttx | johnthetubaguy: we don't see to have mikal around | 08:26 |
| johnthetubaguy | ttx: ah, sorry I am late as well | 08:27 |
| johnthetubaguy | lots track | 08:27 |
| johnthetubaguy | he was up early for another meeting, so maybe he fell asleep | 08:27 |
| johnthetubaguy | ttx: we have some rc2 bugs I think | 08:28 |
| ttx | #startmeeting ptl_sync | 08:28 |
| openstack | ttx: Error: Can't start another meeting, one is in progress. Use #endmeeting first. | 08:28 |
| ttx | #endmeeting | 08:28 |
| openstack | Meeting ended Tue Oct 7 08:28:27 2014 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 08:28 |
| openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/incub_sync/2014/incub_sync.2014-10-02-14.36.html | 08:28 |
| openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/incub_sync/2014/incub_sync.2014-10-02-14.36.txt | 08:28 |
| openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/incub_sync/2014/incub_sync.2014-10-02-14.36.log.html | 08:28 |
| ttx | (oops) | 08:28 |
| johnthetubaguy | doh | 08:28 |
| ttx | #startmeeting ptl_sync | 08:28 |
| openstack | Meeting started Tue Oct 7 08:28:41 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is ttx. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 08:28 |
| openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 08:28 |
| openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'ptl_sync' | 08:28 |
| ttx | #topic Nova | 08:28 |
| mikal | ttx: sorry, my son was at the hospital with an arm injury | 08:28 |
| mikal | Just got back now | 08:29 |
| ttx | mikal: would you prefer we wait? | 08:29 |
| mikal | No, let's go now | 08:29 |
| ttx | https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=juno-rc-potential | 08:29 |
| ttx | anything in particular that would trigger the RC2 ? Some regression ? | 08:30 |
| ttx | Some embarassing fail ? | 08:30 |
| johnthetubaguy | mikal: eek, nasty | 08:30 |
| mikal | Nothing that I've heard about... | 08:30 |
| johnthetubaguy | the libvirt one was a bit nasty | 08:30 |
| mikal | johnthetubaguy: it turns out to be a bad sprain, not a break, so that's good at least | 08:30 |
| johnthetubaguy | mikal: ah, some good news | 08:30 |
| mikal | johnthetubaguy: what was the bug number for that one? | 08:30 |
| ttx | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/126299/ was proposed for backport, I blocked it while we decide | 08:31 |
| johnthetubaguy | mikal: sorry, just digging | 08:31 |
| mikal | NP | 08:31 |
| johnthetubaguy | ah, yeah, thats the one | 08:31 |
| johnthetubaguy | lp1376307 | 08:31 |
| mikal | Sigh. Numa. | 08:31 |
| ttx | https://review.openstack.org/#/q/branch:proposed/juno+project:openstack/nova,n,z | 08:31 |
| johnthetubaguy | yeah... | 08:31 |
| ttx | those are the already-proposed backports ^ | 08:31 |
| mikal | Ok yeah, that's a nova-doesnt-work scale bug, right? | 08:31 |
| johnthetubaguy | mikal: which one is that? | 08:32 |
| mikal | 126299 | 08:32 |
| mikal | nova-compute wont start if libvirt is too old | 08:32 |
| ttx | err... some backports are not even juno-rc-potential, fixing | 08:33 |
| ttx | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/126138/ doesn't realkly hjave a specific bug attached to it | 08:34 |
| johnthetubaguy | mikal: so technically, 126299 only affects a subset of users, but it feels bad | 08:34 |
| mikal | johnthetubaguy: well, including anyone using Ubuntu 12.04 which is still supported | 08:34 |
| mikal | johnthetubaguy: even with cloud archive enabled | 08:34 |
| johnthetubaguy | mikal: OK, thats quite bad | 08:35 |
| mikal | So, I think that means we get to do a rc2 | 08:35 |
| ttx | sure, we seem to have reached critical mass in annoying bugs | 08:35 |
| johnthetubaguy | yeah, I think the vmware fix should go into rc2 if we are doing one | 08:35 |
| ttx | Let me open the milestone | 08:35 |
| ttx | and we can discuss what goes into it | 08:35 |
| mikal | Ok | 08:35 |
| johnthetubaguy | cool | 08:36 |
| johnthetubaguy | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/126177/ comes to mind | 08:36 |
| ttx | https://launchpad.net/nova/+milestone/juno-rc2 | 08:36 |
| ttx | So, let's first have a look at https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=juno-rc-potential | 08:36 |
| * mikal targets that libvirt bug | 08:37 | |
| ttx | top to bottom | 08:37 |
| johnthetubaguy | ttx: but is already committed on trunk, what do we do to it for the milesone? | 08:37 |
| mikal | Ok, lets' do that instead | 08:37 |
| ttx | johnthetubaguy: you set the milestone to RC2. | 08:37 |
| johnthetubaguy | ttx: ah, ok, simples | 08:37 |
| ttx | until we reach release, FixCommitted means "fixed in master", and FixReleased means "fixed in master and juno branch" | 08:37 |
| ttx | https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1373993 | 08:37 |
| johnthetubaguy | feels like a yes | 08:38 |
| mikal | This one doesn't sound like it had an urgent need? | 08:38 |
| ttx | can't hurt | 08:38 |
| mikal | But yeah, can't hurt | 08:38 |
| ttx | It's difficult to do post-release | 08:38 |
| mikal | Agreed | 08:38 |
| mikal | Ok, put it in | 08:38 |
| ttx | https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1376307 | 08:39 |
| ttx | Looks like a regression | 08:39 |
| johnthetubaguy | +1 lets take that | 08:39 |
| mikal | Yep | 08:40 |
| ttx | ok added | 08:40 |
| ttx | https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1376368 | 08:40 |
| ttx | This one is a security issue | 08:40 |
| johnthetubaguy | its not got a commit, so leave it I supose | 08:40 |
| ttx | as long as we fix it pre-release we don't need to OSSA it, so +1 from me | 08:40 |
| johnthetubaguy | well, no code though | 08:40 |
| mikal | Sounds realitively easy to fix? | 08:41 |
| ttx | yes should be | 08:41 |
| mikal | He says without reading the code... | 08:41 |
| johnthetubaguy | well, OK, I guess | 08:41 |
| mikal | How long can we take to get a rc2 out the door? | 08:41 |
| ttx | I think that won't delay it that much | 08:41 |
| ttx | couple days | 08:41 |
| mikal | Can we take a little while to get a fix for that? | 08:41 |
| mikal | Ok, that's enough time | 08:41 |
| mikal | Put it in | 08:41 |
| johnthetubaguy | just we don't check certs, so it feels like a meta issue that revocation isn't checked, but sure | 08:41 |
| ttx | +1 | 08:41 |
| ttx | https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1376492 | 08:42 |
| johnthetubaguy | I think we take that one | 08:42 |
| ttx | regression | 08:42 |
| mikal | Yep | 08:42 |
| mikal | I don't agree its critical, but let's not split hairs | 08:42 |
| johnthetubaguy | rigth | 08:42 |
| ttx | https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1377447 | 08:42 |
| johnthetubaguy | (its critical because it broke the CI only, previous one) | 08:43 |
| ttx | looks like a regression too | 08:43 |
| ttx | fix looks relatively simple too | 08:43 |
| mikal | 1377447 doesn't have a patch | 08:43 |
| ttx | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/126144/ ? | 08:43 |
| ttx | not merged in master yet, but has a patch :) | 08:44 |
| mikal | Oh right, my bad | 08:44 |
| ttx | upgarde bug, so +1 on my side | 08:44 |
| ttx | upgrade* | 08:44 |
| johnthetubaguy | yeah | 08:44 |
| mikal | Yep | 08:44 |
| ttx | https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1376945 | 08:44 |
| johnthetubaguy | (wonders why grenade didn't catch it, but thats for later) | 08:45 |
| mikal | Take that one | 08:45 |
| johnthetubaguy | +1 | 08:45 |
| johnthetubaguy | we broke the API, lets fix it | 08:45 |
| ttx | always easier prerelease, yes | 08:45 |
| ttx | https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1370348 | 08:46 |
| ttx | looks like a corner case | 08:46 |
| ttx | maybe we could consider it when we do the last check on FixCommitted things | 08:47 |
| ttx | to see easy/safe last-minute backports | 08:47 |
| johnthetubaguy | its quite a bit change | 08:47 |
| ttx | yeah | 08:47 |
| mikal | Yeah, no core reviews yet | 08:47 |
| ttx | not sure it would pass the "safe" bar anyway | 08:47 |
| ttx | let's keep it in rc-potential list | 08:47 |
| johnthetubaguy | +1 | 08:47 |
| mikal | Agreed | 08:47 |
| ttx | https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1377644 | 08:47 |
| mikal | Failure to report an error correctly | 08:48 |
| ttx | this one might be worth it | 08:48 |
| ttx | espeically because of its "icehouse to juno" nature | 08:48 |
| ttx | which makes it release-sensitive | 08:48 |
| johnthetubaguy | yeah | 08:48 |
| mikal | Although | 08:49 |
| johnthetubaguy | the patch needs work mind, but yeah | 08:49 |
| ttx | depends on how much the patch can make it though | 08:49 |
| mikal | What should happen is we say "no, don't do that" | 08:49 |
| mikal | So its not really an upgrade story apart from it crashing instead of saying no | 08:49 |
| ttx | if we mark it in release notes, sure | 08:49 |
| johnthetubaguy | ah, true | 08:49 |
| mikal | Very small change though | 08:49 |
| mikal | I say we take it if it lands in time | 08:49 |
| ttx | hmm, let's keep it in rc-potential then | 08:49 |
| ttx | and we'll consider the ones that get to FixCommitted in that list once we get all the targets in | 08:50 |
| johnthetubaguy | sounds like someone "fixed" it by adding an exception, it should work really :( | 08:50 |
| johnthetubaguy | anyways | 08:50 |
| ttx | https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1377981 | 08:50 |
| mikal | Ahh this one | 08:50 |
| mikal | I helped Tristan with this one last week | 08:50 |
| ttx | security, so +1 from me :) | 08:50 |
| mikal | Its only a problem in ssh_execute is only used in baremetal | 08:50 |
| mikal | Which never passes a password on the command line | 08:50 |
| mikal | So this is not a security bug in juno | 08:50 |
| mikal | It is in icehouse though | 08:51 |
| ttx | oh, ok | 08:51 |
| mikal | I don't see a juno patch proposed either | 08:51 |
| johnthetubaguy | crazy stuff, OK then | 08:51 |
| mikal | I'd check with Tristan, but I don't think we need to do anything for juno with this one | 08:51 |
| ttx | ok, let's keep it in -potential for now | 08:51 |
| * ttx removes tag from the ones we targeted to rc2 for clarity | 08:52 | |
| ttx | https://launchpad.net/nova/+milestone/juno-rc2 | 08:53 |
| ttx | I'll approve the corresponding backports | 08:53 |
| mikal | Ok | 08:53 |
| johnthetubaguy | cool | 08:53 |
| ttx | would be good to fast-track the 1376368 and 1377447 patches | 08:53 |
| mikal | I shall pay attention to the two not-fixed bugs tomorrow | 08:53 |
| ttx | let's have a quick look at other FixCommitted bugs | 08:53 |
| mikal | Its been a pretty long day, so I wont be doing much more tonight | 08:53 |
| johnthetubaguy | I can try take a look at those now ish | 08:53 |
| ttx | https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.status%3Alist=FIXCOMMITTED | 08:54 |
| mikal | We;ve already covered the first three there I think | 08:54 |
| ttx | the 4th is a leftover from ancient times, I fixed it | 08:55 |
| mikal | You mean 1275256? | 08:55 |
| ttx | yes | 08:55 |
| ttx | https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1370265 | 08:55 |
| mikal | Oh, the fix was ages ago | 08:55 |
| johnthetubaguy | Date: Sat Sep 6 18:41:51 2014 +0800 ? | 08:56 |
| ttx | 1370265 could make a good backport candidate | 08:56 |
| mikal | I think we might want 1370265 | 08:56 |
| ttx | I like one-line patches | 08:56 |
| mikal | ec2 is also pretty popular with some people | 08:56 |
| ttx | +1 from me | 08:56 |
| mikal | Agreed | 08:57 |
| ttx | adding to rc2 | 08:57 |
| mikal | I think we can skip anything for API v3 | 08:57 |
| * ttx skims through the rest of the list | 08:57 | |
| mikal | 1244918 is ancient too | 08:58 |
| mikal | Ditto 1270573 | 08:58 |
| mikal | and 1257726 | 08:58 |
| johnthetubaguy | nothing massively popped out at me | 08:58 |
| ttx | yeah, all the ones targeted to next or ongoing should be marked fixreleased and removed from those milestones | 08:58 |
| ttx | I'll clean it up | 08:58 |
| ttx | I think we are good | 08:59 |
| mikal | Yeah, nothing else jumps out at me either | 08:59 |
| ttx | I'll process the backports | 08:59 |
| ttx | You can get the missing backports proposed | 08:59 |
| ttx | (like for 1370265) | 08:59 |
| mikal | How do I tell which ones have missing backports without going through them all? | 09:00 |
| mikal | https://launchpad.net/nova/+milestone/juno-rc2 says "fix committed" for that one for example | 09:00 |
| ttx | that means merged in master | 09:00 |
| ttx | you can't tell if the backport was proposed yet or not | 09:00 |
| ttx | unless you check the reviews or bug | 09:01 |
| mikal | Ok, so etherpad tracking time then | 09:01 |
| ttx | mikal: bah, not sure | 09:01 |
| ttx | it's easy to go through the RC2 bugs and propose the missing ones | 09:01 |
| ttx | and then you don't need to track it anymore :) | 09:01 |
| mikal | Heh, ok | 09:02 |
| johnthetubaguy | sounds like a plan | 09:02 |
| mikal | Another thing for tomorrow | 09:02 |
| johnthetubaguy | I was going to say add a tag, but yeah | 09:02 |
| mikal | Unless johnthetubaguy beats me to it | 09:02 |
| ttx | don't worry, will ping you if I miss one ( or propose it myself) | 09:02 |
| ttx | OK, cleaned up stale ones from https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.status%3Alist=FIXCOMMITTED | 09:05 |
| mikal | Thanks | 09:05 |
| ttx | Looks good to me | 09:05 |
| ttx | Thx! | 09:05 |
| johnthetubaguy | cool, which were the two we wanted reviewing now? | 09:05 |
| mikal | We're done for the night? | 09:05 |
| mikal | johnthetubaguy: 1376368 and 1377447 | 09:05 |
| * ttx approves the backports that are targeted | 09:06 | |
| ttx | oh ,just a sec | 09:06 |
| mikal | Holding | 09:07 |
| ttx | What about https://review.openstack.org/#/c/126138/ | 09:07 |
| ttx | Looks like it's only tests, but has no clear bug linked to it, so I thought I'd rather ask | 09:07 |
| johnthetubaguy | its just tests, so I guess I don't mind either way | 09:07 |
| johnthetubaguy | sean through it was good, so I am willing to side with him | 09:08 |
| mikal | Yeah, just tests makes sense to land I think | 09:08 |
| ttx | ok, will approve | 09:08 |
| johnthetubaguy | cools | 09:08 |
| mikal | Cool | 09:08 |
| ttx | that's all, we can discuss in your morning :) | 09:08 |
| johnthetubaguy | thanks all, I will go do some reviews | 09:08 |
| ttx | mikal: no TC meeting tomorrow | 09:08 |
| mikal | Yay! | 09:08 |
| mikal | Sleep in! | 09:08 |
| mikal | I need to finish writing up my thoughts on tents | 09:08 |
| ttx | camping frenzy | 09:09 |
| mikal | One last release thing... | 09:09 |
| mikal | When do I need to panic about release notes? | 09:09 |
| mikal | Now? | 09:09 |
| ttx | generally one week before release, so plenty of t... oh wait | 09:09 |
| ttx | we usually work on release notes in the last week | 09:09 |
| mikal | And we generally use landed blueprints and fixed critical bugs as the things to cover? | 09:10 |
| mikal | http://www.stillhq.com/openstack/juno/000018.html might give me a head start... | 09:10 |
| ttx | right, the essential being to cover any upgrade oddity or known bug that we won't fix | 09:10 |
| mikal | Ok | 09:11 |
| johnthetubaguy | mikal: yeah, often get subteams to fill in their own sections, if I remember correctly | 09:12 |
| mikal | johnthetubaguy: oh, that's a good idea | 09:12 |
| mikal | I also want to include the versions of things we used in CI | 09:12 |
| mikal | To give operators a guide as to what we trust | 09:12 |
| mikal | So I should start collecting that soon | 09:12 |
| johnthetubaguy | cools | 09:12 |
| johnthetubaguy | and versions in the driver CI systems | 09:13 |
| ttx | https://review.openstack.org/#/q/branch:proposed/juno+project:openstack/nova,n,z on their way | 09:13 |
| mikal | johnthetubaguy: yeah, third party CI included | 09:14 |
| ttx | mikal: getting a recent translations in master and backporting it before RC2 wouldn't hurt, too | 09:17 |
| mikal | ttx: makes sense | 09:17 |
| ttx | mikal: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/125558/ | 09:17 |
| ttx | if you get that in, I can backport it | 09:17 |
| mikal | Ok | 09:17 |
| mikal | johnthetubaguy and I can review now? | 09:18 |
| johnthetubaguy | mikal: I have added a +2 | 09:18 |
| mikal | Me tto | 09:18 |
| mikal | Too even | 09:18 |
| mikal | Approved | 09:18 |
| ttx | I'll backport it once it's in | 09:18 |
| mikal | We're done now? | 09:21 |
| ttx | yep | 09:21 |
| johnthetubaguy | mikal: sleep well | 09:21 |
| mikal | Well, now to pack for a three day trip to Sydney | 09:21 |
| mikal | But yeah | 09:21 |
| mikal | Talk later | 09:21 |
| johnthetubaguy | eek | 09:24 |
| *** markwash__ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 09:28 | |
| ttx | jraim: cutting barbican rc1 now thet the open-kilo merge is in | 10:09 |
| ttx | jraim: https://launchpad.net/barbican/juno/juno-rc1 | 10:22 |
| ttx | redrobot: ^ | 10:22 |
| *** markwash__ has quit IRC | 10:36 | |
| *** zbitter has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 10:50 | |
| *** zaneb has quit IRC | 10:54 | |
| *** dhellmann has quit IRC | 10:54 | |
| *** mordred has quit IRC | 10:54 | |
| *** dhellmann has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 10:57 | |
| *** mordred has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 11:06 | |
| ttx | johnthetubaguy: would welcome your +2 on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/126520/ and https://review.openstack.org/#/c/126522/ | 11:27 |
| ttx | (backports from master) | 11:27 |
| johnthetubaguy | ttx: I don't have +2 rights I am afraid | 11:28 |
| ttx | I'll take a +1, it's just so that I don't appear to self-approve without any check | 11:28 |
| johnthetubaguy | sure | 11:29 |
| ttx | FTR I should have used -x while cherrypicking | 11:29 |
| johnthetubaguy | ttx: I was going to say, should we list the commit has you cherry picked in the commit? | 11:29 |
| *** eglynn has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 11:29 | |
| ttx | johnthetubaguy: yeah, I'll redo them | 11:30 |
| johnthetubaguy | ah, no worries, couldn't remember if that was still the norm or not | 11:30 |
| ttx | It's better if we do | 11:30 |
| ttx | But then the ChangeID is the same | 11:30 |
| ttx | so I guess that works | 11:30 |
| johnthetubaguy | yeah, its good to reference the commit I guess, but duno really | 11:31 |
| eglynn | ttx: knock, knock ... ready when you are | 11:45 |
| ttx | #topic Ceilometer | 11:45 |
| ttx | ready now | 11:45 |
| eglynn | bad news: I'm thinking we'll need an RC2 | 11:45 |
| eglynn | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+bugs?field.tag=juno-rc-potential | 11:45 |
| ttx | you're not the only one. | 11:45 |
| ttx | Let's see that | 11:45 |
| eglynn | BTW the medium bug on that list was supposed to have been fixed in juno-rc1 | 11:45 |
| ttx | any particular bug/regression triggering it µ? | 11:45 |
| eglynn | the two high priority bugs on that list above | 11:46 |
| ttx | yeah, saw those... ok, let's open one | 11:46 |
| ttx | just a sec | 11:46 |
| eglynn | also, awkwardly, it looks like we'll need to rev the ceiloclient too | 11:46 |
| eglynn | for https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-ceilometerclient/+bug/1357343 | 11:47 |
| eglynn | (token expiry not being handled) | 11:47 |
| ttx | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+milestone/juno-rc2 | 11:48 |
| ttx | OK, you can propose backports | 11:48 |
| eglynn | cool, thanks! | 11:48 |
| ttx | https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/GerritJenkinsGit#Submit_Changes_in_master_to_proposed.2F.2A | 11:48 |
| ttx | eglynn: let's see if anything else is worth it | 11:48 |
| eglynn | on the client, what are the implication of rev'ing that this late in day | 11:48 |
| eglynn | ? | 11:49 |
| ttx | it's a pain for distros | 11:49 |
| ttx | so it just needs to be very worth it | 11:49 |
| ttx | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+bugs?field.status%3Alist=FIXCOMMITTED | 11:49 |
| eglynn | this too I think https://bugs.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+bug/1377157 | 11:50 |
| ttx | yeah, was looking into it | 11:50 |
| ttx | it's definitely better to post it prerelease than postrelease | 11:50 |
| ttx | adding | 11:51 |
| ttx | anything else worth it in that fixcommitted list? | 11:51 |
| eglynn | I don't think so | 11:52 |
| eglynn | on the client, I'll go ahead and cut python-ceilometerclient 1.0.12, I think it is worth is | 11:52 |
| ttx | two other things... | 11:52 |
| eglynn | shoot | 11:52 |
| ttx | what do you think of https://review.openstack.org/#/c/126336/ ? | 11:52 |
| ttx | it's an alignment with current requirements for proposed/juno, so probably worth it ? | 11:53 |
| eglynn | yeah I think so | 11:53 |
| ttx | ok, you can +2/APRV it then | 11:53 |
| ttx | the other question is about the translations, we should take the RC respin opportunity to refresh them with latest | 11:54 |
| ttx | So maybe approve https://review.openstack.org/#/c/126121/ in master | 11:54 |
| ttx | then I can propose a backport for that | 11:54 |
| eglynn | yep, that's fair | 11:55 |
| ttx | actually I also need to backport the previous update | 11:55 |
| ttx | but yeah, approve in master first | 11:55 |
| eglynn | cool, I'll backport the three bug fixes to proposed/juno | 11:56 |
| ttx | I'll hunt down the previous tranbslations update and get it proposed. | 11:56 |
| ttx | eglynn: ok, I think we are good. | 11:56 |
| eglynn | quick question ... what's the deadline for finalizing the summit design session tracks? | 11:57 |
| ttx | we need the agenda set one week before summit | 11:57 |
| eglynn | cool | 11:57 |
| eglynn | we've already 9 proposals for the ceilo track, but I've a feeling there a few more hinding in the long grass | 11:58 |
| eglynn | ... so I wanted to give it another week before deciding which topics to include | 11:58 |
| ttx | you need to pick which ones you want to get advertised on the schedule, vs. the ones you can decide in the meetup | 11:59 |
| ttx | eglynn: translations step 1 backport: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/126536/ | 11:59 |
| ttx | since I proposed it, you can +2/APRV it for me | 12:00 |
| eglynn | cool, done | 12:00 |
| ttx | I'll propose step 2 once it merges in master. | 12:00 |
| eglynn | cool | 12:01 |
| ttx | ping me when you have the other backports up, will approve them | 12:01 |
| eglynn | will do, thanks! | 12:02 |
| ttx | johnthetubaguy: ok, updated https://review.openstack.org/#/c/126520/ & https://review.openstack.org/#/c/126522/ (now includes cherrypicked SHA) | 12:06 |
| eglynn | ttx: here are the other backports https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/ceilometer+branch:proposed/juno,n,z | 12:08 |
| ttx | eglynn: all set | 12:09 |
| eglynn | thank you sir! | 12:09 |
| dhellmann | ttx: ready when you are | 12:13 |
| ttx | #topic Oslo | 12:13 |
| ttx | dhellmann: hi! | 12:14 |
| dhellmann | ttx: good afternoon | 12:14 |
| ttx | Was wonering about the recent taskflow bump, and if we need to do anything about it requirements-wise | 12:14 |
| dhellmann | that was primarily a bug fix, so as long as we're not capping we should be ok internally | 12:15 |
| ttx | ok | 12:15 |
| dhellmann | do we generally assume the distros package new versions of libs without us explicitly updating requirements? | 12:15 |
| dhellmann | I guess I have been assuming that, so I'm really asking if I should :-) | 12:16 |
| ttx | hmm | 12:17 |
| ttx | no we can't. capping really depends how much 0.4.0 was broken | 12:18 |
| ttx | if it's solving a distro corner case, then it's fine | 12:18 |
| ttx | which I think is the case here | 12:18 |
| ttx | basically the distros know 0.5.0 solves the issue for them so they update it | 12:18 |
| ttx | while those who don't care happily live with 0.4.0 | 12:18 |
| dhellmann | yeah, I don't know if this was a corner case. The primary issue was for six.moves poor threading support, IIRC | 12:19 |
| dhellmann | https://bitbucket.org/gutworth/six/issue/98/ | 12:20 |
| ttx | should we discuss that at the meeting later today ? | 12:20 |
| dhellmann | that might be a good idea | 12:20 |
| ttx | it's an all-bump or noone-bump thing -- and may trigger respins | 12:21 |
| * ttx wonders which project depends on taskflow right now | 12:21 | |
| * ttx quickchecks | 12:21 | |
| dhellmann | looks like just cinder, but that doesn't seem right | 12:21 |
| ttx | yes, I arive at same conclusion | 12:23 |
| ttx | +r | 12:23 |
| ttx | If it's just cinder we can discuss it with jgriffith | 12:23 |
| dhellmann | ok. I posted the question in #openstack-oslo for josh | 12:24 |
| dhellmann | he won't be online for a few hours, but it should be before the meeting this afternoon | 12:24 |
| ttx | ok then.. anything else ? | 12:24 |
| dhellmann | I need the other PTLs to provide liaisons for kilo. I was going to mention that today in case they missed the message to the ML | 12:24 |
| johnthetubaguy | ttx: I am good with those nova patches, +1ed them | 12:24 |
| ttx | ok, approved them | 12:27 |
| ttx | dhellmann: ok, just reiterate it during the meeting | 12:27 |
| dhellmann | ttx: sounds good | 12:27 |
| ttx | dhellmann: I think we are good | 12:27 |
| dhellmann | ttx: ok, thanks and ttyl | 12:27 |
| *** zbitter is now known as zaneb | 12:28 | |
| *** eglynn has quit IRC | 12:41 | |
| ttx | jgriffith: ready when you are | 13:57 |
| nikhil_k | ttx: thanks for adding the tag | 13:58 |
| ttx | dolphm: ready when you are | 14:04 |
| dolphm | ttx: o/ | 14:05 |
| ttx | #topic Keystone | 14:05 |
| ttx | https://launchpad.net/keystone/+milestone/juno-rc2 | 14:05 |
| ttx | All set | 14:05 |
| morganfainberg | o/ | 14:05 |
| * morganfainberg looks | 14:05 | |
| dolphm | ttx: thanks for the +A's, i don't think we're missing anything | 14:05 |
| ttx | dolphm, morganfainberg: would like to refresh the translations before we cut RC2 though | 14:05 |
| ttx | So get https://review.openstack.org/#/c/124950/ in master | 14:06 |
| dolphm | ttx: ah, alrighty | 14:06 |
| ttx | and then I can backport it | 14:06 |
| morganfainberg | sounds good | 14:06 |
| ttx | Once that merges, unless there is a red flag, I'll cut RC2 | 14:06 |
| dolphm | ttx: can we regenerate it for proposed/juno? | 14:06 |
| ttx | ah. hm. | 14:07 |
| dolphm | ttx: otherwise line numbers may be off | 14:07 |
| dolphm | ttx: and might have unused strings | 14:07 |
| ttx | Been doing straight backports so far, but you're right | 14:07 |
| ttx | hrm. | 14:07 |
| ttx | I have no idea how we would do that though | 14:08 |
| morganfainberg | ttx, i think we'd need to add a job via infra to do it | 14:08 |
| ttx | Sounds like a good topic for today's meeting | 14:09 |
| dolphm | morganfainberg: it'd be useful if it generally picked up any proposed/* branches | 14:09 |
| morganfainberg | not sure how much work/difficult it would be... or someone might be able to run the command(s) directly to generate, just not sure what those would be | 14:09 |
| *** david-lyle has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 14:09 | |
| morganfainberg | dolphm, yeah. | 14:09 |
| dolphm | even stable/*, now that i think about it. as we backport stuff, we're going to have the same issue with translations falling out of sync | 14:10 |
| ttx | hmmkay. I'll probaly hold cutting RC2s until we have a good answer for that | 14:10 |
| ttx | and we can discuss it at meeting today | 14:10 |
| ttx | that's of interest to david-lyle as well | 14:10 |
| dolphm | ttx: ++ | 14:10 |
| ttx | (david-lyle: we are discussing how to refresh translations on proposed/juno without importing unused/offset translations from master) | 14:11 |
| ttx | dolphm: ok, anything else ? | 14:12 |
| dolphm | ttx: not from me | 14:12 |
| ttx | dolphm: good ctach there! | 14:12 |
| ttx | catch, even | 14:12 |
| david-lyle | Our translations will be proposed to juno independently of master I believe | 14:13 |
| david-lyle | Daisy set up transfer to go to juno, I believe | 14:13 |
| david-lyle | *transifex | 14:13 |
| ttx | david-lyle: if that's the case we would have seen proposals coming | 14:14 |
| ttx | they still refresh master | 14:14 |
| ttx | might be a milestone-proposed vs. proposed/juno glitch, though | 14:14 |
| morganfainberg | ah | 14:14 |
| morganfainberg | that might be it. | 14:15 |
| ttx | we'll see | 14:15 |
| dolphm | morganfainberg: know which repo the transifex proposals come from? | 14:15 |
| ttx | david-lyle: ready to go now ? | 14:15 |
| * dolphm steps into -infra | 14:15 | |
| david-lyle | You are correct still going to master | 14:16 |
| david-lyle | Might be based on a private fork | 14:16 |
| david-lyle | Bought to take off but we can try | 14:16 |
| david-lyle | About | 14:16 |
| david-lyle | +1 for phone irc | 14:17 |
| ttx | #topic Horizon | 14:17 |
| morganfainberg | david-lyle, yay phone irc :) | 14:17 |
| ttx | no RC2 window opened yet -- I think we can still wait a bit | 14:17 |
| ttx | we know we'll do one , if only to update translations | 14:17 |
| ttx | any critical bug that warrants us opening a RC2 window just now ? | 14:18 |
| david-lyle | Sure, we have on doc patch merged that would be nice but nothing critical | 14:18 |
| ttx | https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bugs?field.tag=juno-rc-potential | 14:18 |
| david-lyle | We can wait on the doc patch | 14:18 |
| ttx | yeah, I think that can wait for tomorrow. I want people to shake the RC1 a bit more | 14:18 |
| david-lyle | I guess both doc patches have merged | 14:19 |
| david-lyle | Sure | 14:19 |
| david-lyle | No rush translations are slated for the 9th | 14:19 |
| ttx | anything to discuss today, apart from abovementioned translations issue ? | 14:19 |
| david-lyle | No, that should cover it | 14:19 |
| david-lyle | You want final summit schedules when? | 14:20 |
| ttx | alright then, you can take off, will talk to you tomorrow | 14:20 |
| ttx | at least one week before summit starts | 14:20 |
| david-lyle | Ok on target for that | 14:20 |
| david-lyle | Talk to you later today | 14:20 |
| ttx | until release we are a bit too busy := | 14:21 |
| david-lyle | Agreed | 14:21 |
| david-lyle | Thanks | 14:21 |
| ttx | jgriffith: around now ? | 14:21 |
| *** david-lyle has quit IRC | 14:21 | |
| ttx | SergeyLukjanov: around now ? | 14:21 |
| ttx | mestery: ready when you are | 14:35 |
| mestery | ttx: o/ | 14:36 |
| mestery | ttx: In neutron meeting but can multi-task | 14:36 |
| ttx | #topic Neutron | 14:36 |
| ttx | https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bugs?field.tag=juno-rc-potential | 14:37 |
| ttx | Anything that would trigger a RC2 for sure in there ? | 14:37 |
| mestery | https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1357055 | 14:37 |
| mestery | And https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1367892 | 14:37 |
| ttx | well, if it gets fixed, why not | 14:37 |
| mestery | :) | 14:37 |
| mestery | ttx: I need to talk to markmcclain today, there was some DB migration thing which we need. | 14:38 |
| mestery | ttx: Otherwise, this list has grown in the 10 minutes since we discussed in the neutron meeting! | 14:39 |
| mestery | So I need to verify the new ones which were added in that time by the team. :) | 14:39 |
| ttx | mestery: how about we discuss opening a RC2 window tomorrow ? | 14:39 |
| ttx | in the mean time, pile up fixes in master | 14:39 |
| mestery | ttx: Perfect for me. | 14:39 |
| mestery | ttx: Ack | 14:39 |
| ttx | no need to push backports right now | 14:39 |
| mestery | ttx: Anyone else doing an RC2, or are we it? | 14:39 |
| ttx | only makes me -2 them | 14:39 |
| mestery | :P | 14:39 |
| ttx | so far keystone glance nova sahara ceilo | 14:39 |
| ttx | I expect most will do one | 14:40 |
| ttx | the question is, you want RC1 to live a bit before you say you'll scrap it | 14:40 |
| ttx | so that it gets tested | 14:40 |
| mestery | Agreed | 14:40 |
| ttx | What do you think of https://review.openstack.org/#/c/126340/ ? Would make RC2 too, right ? | 14:41 |
| * mestery looks | 14:41 | |
| mestery | I think so yes | 14:41 |
| ttx | hmm | 14:41 |
| ttx | That would be https://review.openstack.org/#/c/122646/ in master | 14:42 |
| ttx | so probably better to approve that first | 14:42 |
| * mestery looks again | 14:42 | |
| mestery | Yes, I see that one. | 14:42 |
| mestery | I can rebase that patch today for master | 14:42 |
| ttx | would be great | 14:42 |
| * mestery notes an action to do that right after this meeting. | 14:43 | |
| ttx | You can also review https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bugs?field.status%3Alist=FIXCOMMITTED for other juno-rc-potential baclport candidates | 14:43 |
| ttx | that should be all the bugfixes that have made it master recently | 14:44 |
| ttx | Pick the safe ones | 14:44 |
| mestery | Agreed. | 14:44 |
| mestery | It's on my list of things to do today | 14:44 |
| ttx | and we'll talk tomorow | 14:44 |
| mestery | Cool | 14:44 |
| mestery | You know where to find me ;) | 14:44 |
| ttx | I do. | 14:45 |
| mestery | The firehose from starting the new job has died down a bit, so I am able to focus more this week which has helped. | 14:45 |
| mestery | I'm hoping to sync with mikal this week and sort out if we can claim nova-network is deprecated in Juno now. More to come on that next week. | 14:47 |
| mestery | Otherwise, that's all I've got this week. | 14:47 |
| ttx | ok | 14:49 |
| SergeyLukjanov | ttx, I'm here | 15:06 |
| ttx | #topic Sahara | 15:06 |
| ttx | https://launchpad.net/sahara/+milestone/juno-rc2 | 15:07 |
| ttx | SergeyLukjanov: looks all set | 15:07 |
| ttx | SergeyLukjanov: was wondering about your translations update | 15:07 |
| ttx | did you "adapt" it to match proposed/juno ? | 15:07 |
| ttx | see recent discussion with dolphm and AJaeger in -infra | 15:07 |
| ttx | because importing from master may result in line numbers drift/ extra messages | 15:07 |
| ttx | so was wondering if we didn't need an extra fix there | 15:08 |
| ttx | SergeyLukjanov: ^ | 15:08 |
| SergeyLukjanov | yeah, I'm looking | 15:09 |
| SergeyLukjanov | ttx, hm | 15:10 |
| SergeyLukjanov | ttx, /me need some time to ensure that it's ok | 15:11 |
| SergeyLukjanov | ttx, only https://github.com/openstack/sahara/commit/dfdd0bdb23f8f70a45a9da463a8e5be73585f109 was not backported and it was before the translations update | 15:12 |
| SergeyLukjanov | ttx, everything else looks good | 15:12 |
| SergeyLukjanov | ttx, is there any process to pull latest translations for release? | 15:14 |
| ttx | SergeyLukjanov: no | 15:15 |
| ttx | we just update them at every RC | 15:15 |
| ttx | they are supposed to be completed now (we said before Oct 1 originally) | 15:15 |
| ttx | but then if we do new RCs we just update them | 15:15 |
| ttx | SergeyLukjanov: ok, so looks like we have a winner | 15:16 |
| ttx | SergeyLukjanov: I'll tag it later today, beore the release meeting | 15:16 |
| ttx | since we don't have TC meeting today | 15:16 |
| SergeyLukjanov | okay, thank you | 15:16 |
| ttx | SergeyLukjanov: let me know if I should hold for any reason | 15:16 |
| SergeyLukjanov | ttx, ack | 15:17 |
| ttx | It *will* be the final unless deep shit happens | 15:17 |
| ttx | so time to shake it | 15:17 |
| ttx | (and check it) | 15:17 |
| SergeyLukjanov | ttx, we're shaking it last two weeks ;) | 15:17 |
| * SergeyLukjanov needs to grab coffee... | 15:17 | |
| ttx | SergeyLukjanov: ok, ttyl then | 15:18 |
| ttx | jgriffith: got time now ? | 15:18 |
| ttx | notmyname: ready when you are | 15:21 |
| mestery | ttx: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/122646/12 | 15:21 |
| mestery | ttx: rebased, FYI. | 15:21 |
| ttx | ack, push it! | 15:22 |
| ttx | shoud probably have been in RC1 | 15:22 |
| notmyname | ttx: here | 15:29 |
| ttx | #topic Swift | 15:31 |
| ttx | notmyname: o/ | 15:31 |
| notmyname | hello | 15:31 |
| ttx | So, how is your RC1 doing so far ? | 15:31 |
| notmyname | so far so good | 15:31 |
| notmyname | nothing has come up yet, that I'm aware of | 15:31 |
| ttx | I wanted to talk quickly about https://bugs.launchpad.net/ossa/+bug/1365350 | 15:32 |
| ttx | and disucss if we should backport it to stable/icehouse | 15:32 |
| ttx | (or if it makes sense to backport it to stable/icehouse) | 15:32 |
| ttx | since that blocks ourt releasing of an advisory right now | 15:32 |
| notmyname | good question | 15:32 |
| ttx | I would lean towards yes, but you know if it's an easy backport or not | 15:33 |
| notmyname | I'm not sure either, but I'd lean the same way | 15:33 |
| ttx | we don't necesarily need to cut a 1.13.2 release for that | 15:33 |
| ttx | just make the patch available if someone is for some reason stuck on icehouse | 15:33 |
| ttx | and publish it in stable/icehouse branch | 15:33 |
| ttx | if you agree, I'd welcome your help (or some other Swift team member) to propose backport to stable/icehouse | 15:34 |
| ttx | then we can get CVE assigned and publish advisory | 15:34 |
| notmyname | ok, I'll look at how tricky a backport will be | 15:35 |
| ttx | notmyname: great, thx | 15:35 |
| ttx | other question is about https://review.openstack.org/#/c/126341/ -- I suppose we should ignore it ? | 15:35 |
| ttx | It's the automated proposal to sync requirements to proposed/juno branch | 15:35 |
| ttx | If yes, put your -2 on there as well :) | 15:35 |
| notmyname | hadn't seen it yet | 15:36 |
| notmyname | so what is the proposed/juno branch? | 15:36 |
| ttx | it's the release branch for 2.2.0 | 15:36 |
| ttx | where we would do aRC2, should it be necessary | 15:37 |
| ttx | while master is on kilo already | 15:37 |
| notmyname | ah, got it. I hadn't realized there had been a branch instead of just a tag. I thought we only did the branch after a patch was necessary | 15:37 |
| ttx | notmyname: for intermediary releases yes | 15:37 |
| notmyname | ok | 15:37 |
| ttx | for the final, I align with the other's process | 15:37 |
| ttx | proposed/juno becomes stable/juno at release time | 15:38 |
| notmyname | ok | 15:38 |
| ttx | so my guess is that requirements update should know the same fate as the master ones | 15:38 |
| notmyname | yes | 15:39 |
| ttx | i.e. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/88736/ | 15:39 |
| notmyname | still waiting on that simple solver monty promised me ;-) | 15:39 |
| ttx | ok, so you can -2 it to make sure I don't include it after drinking too much | 15:39 |
| notmyname | yes | 15:39 |
| ttx | notmyname: that's all I had | 15:39 |
| notmyname | ok, great. I'll get stuff added to LP this week. and check on the backport | 15:40 |
| ttx | notmyname: anything on your side ? | 15:40 |
| notmyname | I'm good | 15:40 |
| ttx | great, thx! Talk to you later | 15:40 |
| ttx | zaneb: ready when you are | 15:41 |
| zaneb | ttx: go ahead :) | 15:41 |
| ttx | #topic Heat | 15:41 |
| ttx | https://bugs.launchpad.net/heat/+bugs?field.tag=juno-rc-potential | 15:41 |
| ttx | Anything worth respinning RCs in there ? | 15:41 |
| zaneb | 1376857 is a (small) memory leak, which worries me a little | 15:42 |
| zaneb | not sure what the threshold is for respinning RCs? | 15:42 |
| ttx | zaneb: at the moment it's low, but it's growing fast | 15:43 |
| ttx | respinning is relatively fast once we decided it | 15:43 |
| ttx | zaneb: how about we let one more day of RC1 testing and we make the call tomorrow ? | 15:43 |
| ttx | We'll probably do a RC2 over the requirements sync | 15:44 |
| ttx | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/126339/ | 15:44 |
| ttx | so that you're aligned on the juno openstack/requirements values | 15:44 |
| zaneb | ok, in that case I would like to get bug #1376857 in too | 15:44 |
| zaneb | makes sense | 15:44 |
| zaneb | and I'll check with folks about the others to see if they're needed | 15:45 |
| ttx | zaneb: would you rather open the RC2 now (and start the backport) or let it be tested for one more day ? | 15:45 |
| ttx | When we open a RC2 everyone stops testing RC1 :) | 15:45 |
| ttx | I'm fine with either | 15:45 |
| zaneb | one more day then ;) | 15:45 |
| zaneb | probably you could go months without the memory leak blowing up in your face | 15:46 |
| ttx | ok, that sounds good | 15:46 |
| ttx | zaneb: you can review (+2) https://review.openstack.org/#/c/126339/ in the mean time | 15:47 |
| ttx | I'll unblock it when we open the RC2 window | 15:47 |
| zaneb | I can only +1, but it's done | 15:47 |
| ttx | we'll also update the most recent translations, as that would probably be our final RC (fingers crossed) | 15:47 |
| ttx | ah? /me checks perms | 15:48 |
| ttx | ah https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/113,members | 15:48 |
| zaneb | ah, I am only in https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/152,members | 15:48 |
| ttx | ok fixed | 15:48 |
| ttx | basically you and I can approved proposed/juno fixes | 15:49 |
| zaneb | why do we have heat-milestone and heat-release groups? | 15:49 |
| ttx | not sure | 15:49 |
| ttx | hmm | 15:49 |
| * zaneb goes to update his PTL guide | 15:49 | |
| ttx | reelease must be to tag clients | 15:50 |
| ttx | milestone to approve patches to proposed/* | 15:50 |
| ttx | could probably be same group | 15:50 |
| zaneb | heat-release is for stable backports | 15:50 |
| zaneb | that much I know :) | 15:50 |
| zaneb | yeah, seems like one group for both would be easiest | 15:50 |
| ttx | bah, we'll fix that another day | 15:51 |
| zaneb | :D | 15:51 |
| ttx | zaneb: OK, i'll talk to you later then | 15:51 |
| zaneb | ttx: cool, thank you! | 15:51 |
| ttx | maybe before release meeting | 15:51 |
| ttx | nikhil_k: ready when you are | 15:51 |
| ttx | jgriffith: if you're around you can steal the spot now | 15:56 |
| nikhil_k | ttx: hi | 15:57 |
| ttx | ah, nikhil wins | 15:57 |
| ttx | #topic Glance | 15:57 |
| ttx | https://launchpad.net/glance/+milestone/juno-rc2 | 15:57 |
| ttx | Still missing 5 bugfixes in master | 15:57 |
| ttx | unless we decide to not wait for them | 15:57 |
| * ttx brings up reviews | 15:57 | |
| ttx | https://review.openstack.org/122266 | 15:58 |
| nikhil_k | ttx: was hoping that we still have one more day | 15:58 |
| ttx | Looks like this one could be approved | 15:58 |
| ttx | nikhil_k: you can | 15:58 |
| ttx | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/120957/ | 15:59 |
| ttx | needs another +2 | 15:59 |
| ttx | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/121188/ | 15:59 |
| ttx | needs two +2s so seems rather far away | 15:59 |
| ttx | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/120432/ | 16:00 |
| ttx | is -2ed, should we remove it from RC2 ? | 16:00 |
| nikhil_k | ttx: ah that one | 16:00 |
| nikhil_k | I was going to ask | 16:00 |
| ttx | Also not so sure about where the fix for https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance/+bug/1368965 lives | 16:00 |
| ttx | ok, let's decide on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/120432/ first | 16:00 |
| nikhil_k | basically, Travis said that he was debugging the 'correctness' of that one | 16:01 |
| ttx | that one feels dangerous | 16:01 |
| nikhil_k | hmm | 16:01 |
| nikhil_k | not sure how dangerous though, it's basically trying to remove ID generation and relying on DB | 16:02 |
| nikhil_k | remove ID generation on Glance | 16:02 |
| ttx | feels like something that could be backported to stable/juno postrelease though | 16:02 |
| ttx | you might not want to rush it in one week before release | 16:02 |
| *** SlickNik has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 16:02 | |
| nikhil_k | does it have a possibility for post-release? | 16:02 |
| ttx | a bit unclear.. does the patch change the DB ? | 16:03 |
| nikhil_k | no, it changes the interaction with the ORM | 16:03 |
| nikhil_k | basically, while creating a row | 16:04 |
| nikhil_k | they specified if the ID should NOT be passed in from Glance sqlalchemy code | 16:04 |
| nikhil_k | and rahter create the row and let the DB create the UUID for resp. ID | 16:05 |
| nikhil_k | return value to the API is fetch of the row from DB | 16:05 |
| ttx | hmm, just have no idea how common the isage of this command is | 16:05 |
| nikhil_k | yeah, it's rather off hand | 16:05 |
| ttx | nikhil_k: I think we shouldn't block RC2 on that one | 16:05 |
| ttx | let's put it back to juno-rc-potential | 16:05 |
| nikhil_k | ohk sure | 16:05 |
| ttx | if it makes it to master very soon, we'll reconsider it | 16:05 |
| ttx | https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance/+bug/1368965 now | 16:06 |
| ttx | oh that would be https://review.openstack.org/#/c/121998/ | 16:07 |
| ttx | still needs two +2s | 16:07 |
| nikhil_k | should be straightforward | 16:07 |
| nikhil_k | yeah | 16:08 |
| ttx | do youy think you can get the remaining ones in before tomorrow ? | 16:08 |
| ttx | then I think we are still good | 16:08 |
| nikhil_k | I was going to email the core reviewers to look at this list on priority | 16:08 |
| nikhil_k | hopefully, we can clear most of these by tomorrow. I will review them soon too | 16:08 |
| ttx | The other two things would be: | 16:09 |
| ttx | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/123698/ | 16:09 |
| ttx | requirements update for master | 16:09 |
| ttx | to match current common requiremenrs | 16:09 |
| nikhil_k | tricky but doeable | 16:09 |
| ttx | and https://review.openstack.org/#/c/126338/ for propsoed/juno | 16:09 |
| nikhil_k | sure | 16:09 |
| ttx | why tricky ? | 16:09 |
| nikhil_k | sometimes the tests fail if requirements are updated however, for that particular one seems rather safe | 16:10 |
| ttx | We'll also want updated translations, so you can start by approving https://review.openstack.org/#/c/124565/ in master | 16:11 |
| nikhil_k | ttx: do you need someone to approve all of the proposed/juno patches or if it is merged in master it would be fine? | 16:11 |
| nikhil_k | sure about the translations patch | 16:11 |
| ttx | then we'll work on a backport for that -- we'll discuss a script in the release meeting at 21:00 UTC | 16:11 |
| ttx | nikhil_k: if merged in master I can approve them | 16:11 |
| nikhil_k | ohk sure | 16:11 |
| nikhil_k | ah great | 16:11 |
| ttx | ok, that's all I had | 16:12 |
| ttx | We can talk more in a few hours and see where we stand | 16:12 |
| nikhil_k | sync up tomorrow same time for rc2? | 16:12 |
| nikhil_k | sure | 16:12 |
| ttx | Lots of stuff that need to merge in master at this point | 16:12 |
| ttx | nikhil_k: ok | 16:12 |
| ttx | SlickNik: ready? | 16:13 |
| SlickNik | ttx: yup o/ | 16:13 |
| ttx | #topic Trove | 16:13 |
| ttx | https://bugs.launchpad.net/trove/+bugs?field.status%3Alist=FIXCOMMITTED | 16:13 |
| ttx | ANything in there that will trigger a RC2 for sure ? | 16:13 |
| SlickNik | Nope. | 16:14 |
| ttx | OK, I'll ping you again tomorrow, but I think RC1 can live for another day at least | 16:15 |
| ttx | SlickNik: anything on your mind ? | 16:15 |
| SlickNik | Are there plans for a second RC if RC1 still holds good? | 16:15 |
| SlickNik | ttx: updated Trove status on the Gap Coverage. | 16:15 |
| ttx | SlickNik: not really. Your requirements are ok, and you had recent translations merged for RC1 | 16:16 |
| ttx | so it looks good to go afaict | 16:16 |
| SlickNik | ttx: That's what I figured — cool, thanks. | 16:16 |
| ttx | SlickNik: well, talk to you later, then | 16:16 |
| ttx | jgriffith: still not around? | 16:16 |
| SlickNik | ttx: thanks! | 16:17 |
| SlickNik | tty later. | 16:17 |
| jgriffith | ttx: yo | 16:19 |
| ttx | #topic Cinder | 16:19 |
| ttx | jgriffith: o/ | 16:19 |
| jgriffith | ttx: goooood morning | 16:19 |
| ttx | https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bugs?field.status%3Alist=FIXCOMMITTED | 16:20 |
| ttx | I think we want a RC2 for 1350504 at least | 16:20 |
| ttx | Also you need a requirements adjustment | 16:20 |
| jgriffith | ttx: yeah | 16:20 |
| ttx | Any reason to oppose https://review.openstack.org/#/c/122559/ in master ? | 16:21 |
| jgriffith | ttx: all of those are safe IMO to go ahead and ommit | 16:21 |
| jgriffith | ttx: I get nervous on those as they've bitten us in the past | 16:21 |
| jgriffith | ttx: but I'm ok with it if everyone is syncing | 16:22 |
| ttx | yeah | 16:22 |
| ttx | Then we should be able to unblock https://review.openstack.org/#/c/126337/ | 16:22 |
| jgriffith | ttx: yes, I'm good with that | 16:22 |
| ttx | So how about I open a RC2 with all the juno-rc-potential stauff in | 16:23 |
| ttx | and you can get busy backporting | 16:23 |
| jgriffith | ttx: yeah that sounds good | 16:23 |
| jgriffith | ttx: I can get those done pretty quick | 16:23 |
| ttx | ok let me open that quick | 16:23 |
| jgriffith | ttx: alright, and I'll start the backports | 16:23 |
| jgriffith | ttx: so the global req's... | 16:23 |
| jgriffith | ttx: you want to unblock and we'll get that merged so I can bp once it lands | 16:24 |
| jgriffith | ttx: oh... you've got Juno branch set on that one | 16:24 |
| jgriffith | NM | 16:24 |
| jgriffith | that one will just sort itself I'm assuming | 16:24 |
| ttx | ok: https://launchpad.net/cinder/+milestone/juno-rc2 | 16:26 |
| ttx | One more bug at https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bugs?field.tag=juno-rc-potential | 16:26 |
| ttx | Looks like a regression ? | 16:26 |
| jgriffith | added | 16:27 |
| jgriffith | yes | 16:27 |
| ttx | hmm, we'll need a fix for that one, quick | 16:28 |
| jgriffith | ttx: I'll just patch that to catch the exception and continue | 16:28 |
| jgriffith | ttx: I'll work on it right now | 16:28 |
| ttx | ok great, get that in master fast | 16:28 |
| jgriffith | then roll the backports | 16:28 |
| ttx | We'llalso refresh translations, so you can get https://review.openstack.org/#/c/123944/ in | 16:28 |
| ttx | once in master, we'll run some script to import it for proposed/juno | 16:29 |
| ttx | (tbfd at release meeting today) | 16:29 |
| jgriffith | ttx: so to clarify, I "will not" run my bp script on that one | 16:29 |
| jgriffith | ? | 16:29 |
| ttx | your bp script ? | 16:29 |
| jgriffith | backport | 16:30 |
| ttx | jgriffith: apparently that can screw things over, a specific backport needs to be made | 16:30 |
| ttx | that's the topic of todays meeting discussion | 16:30 |
| jgriffith | :) | 16:30 |
| jgriffith | preview eh | 16:30 |
| jgriffith | ok | 16:30 |
| ttx | jgriffith: last thing I wanted to discuss is the need to bump your requirements to taskflow>=0.5.0 | 16:30 |
| ttx | that was bumped recently and you're the only project to use it | 16:31 |
| ttx | (apparently) | 16:31 |
| jgriffith | ttx: yes, I don't think anybody else has picked up taskflow yet | 16:31 |
| jgriffith | ttx: and it was a bug that we needed fixed | 16:31 |
| ttx | so we could in theory get that bumped in master and proposed/juno openstack/requirements | 16:31 |
| ttx | and synced in master and proposed/juno cinder | 16:32 |
| ttx | jgriffith: think it's worth it ? | 16:32 |
| ttx | dhellmann: ^ | 16:32 |
| jgriffith | ttx: would be good | 16:32 |
| dhellmann | ttx, jgriffith : wfm | 16:32 |
| ttx | jgriffith: care to propose the bump to master requirements ? | 16:32 |
| jgriffith | ttx: will do right now | 16:32 |
| ttx | dhellmann and myself could approve it | 16:32 |
| ttx | dhellmann: we should warn the distros... how about a thread on -dev ? | 16:33 |
| dhellmann | ++ | 16:33 |
| ttx | replying to the announcement | 16:33 |
| jgriffith | ttx: wait... | 16:33 |
| jgriffith | ttx: we're at >=0.4 | 16:33 |
| jgriffith | in global | 16:33 |
| jgriffith | and cinder | 16:34 |
| ttx | jgriffith: yes, and we would bump to 0.5.0 ? | 16:34 |
| jgriffith | 0.4 was the need for our fix.... | 16:34 |
| ttx | oh? | 16:34 |
| jgriffith | IIRC yes | 16:34 |
| ttx | dhellmann: hmm, we should confirm that | 16:34 |
| ttx | I'll just add it to the meeting agenda. jgriffith: you'll be around at 21:00 UTC ? | 16:34 |
| dhellmann | the fix for the six issue is in 0.5.0, but if that wasn't a problem for cinder I'm not sure we need to worry about it | 16:35 |
| jgriffith | ttx: dhellmann I can also check with harlow to make sure | 16:35 |
| dhellmann | ttx: yeah, I haven't heard from josh yet | 16:35 |
| jgriffith | ttx: yeah, I'll be sure to be there | 16:35 |
| ttx | jgriffith: ok, let's all sync there | 16:35 |
| jgriffith | ttx: and see if I can drag thingee along | 16:35 |
| jgriffith | sounds good | 16:35 |
| ttx | adding to agenda | 16:35 |
| ttx | ok, I think that is all. | 16:36 |
| jgriffith | works for me, pinged harlow | 16:36 |
| jgriffith | I'll go back to working up that patch | 16:36 |
| ttx | #endmeeting | 16:37 |
| openstack | Meeting ended Tue Oct 7 16:37:43 2014 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 16:37 |
| openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ptl_sync/2014/ptl_sync.2014-10-07-08.28.html | 16:37 |
| openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ptl_sync/2014/ptl_sync.2014-10-07-08.28.txt | 16:37 |
| openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ptl_sync/2014/ptl_sync.2014-10-07-08.28.log.html | 16:37 |
| ttx | talk to you all later at the project meeting at 21:00 UTC | 16:37 |
| jgriffith | ttx: thanks!! | 16:38 |
| *** markwash__ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 17:18 | |
| *** markwash__ has quit IRC | 17:31 | |
| *** markwash__ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 17:32 | |
| *** johnthetubaguy is now known as zz_johnthetubagu | 18:30 | |
| *** david-lyle has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 18:32 | |
| *** david-lyle is now known as david-lyle_afk | 19:25 | |
| *** arnaud has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 19:27 | |
| *** arnaud__ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 19:27 | |
| *** dansmith is now known as __god | 19:28 | |
| *** __god is now known as dansmith | 19:29 | |
| *** david-lyle_afk has quit IRC | 19:30 | |
| *** david-lyle has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 20:15 | |
| ttx | SergeyLukjanov: still ok for a savanna rc2 ? | 20:21 |
| SergeyLukjanov | ttx, yup | 20:21 |
| ttx | I mean sahara | 20:21 |
| SergeyLukjanov | ttx, I feel no difference ;) | 20:21 |
| ttx | ok, on its way | 20:22 |
| SergeyLukjanov | ttx, great, awesome | 20:25 |
| SergeyLukjanov | ttx, I'll push tag to the extra repos and I'm going to release 2014.1.3 today or tomorrow | 20:25 |
| SergeyLukjanov | ttx, thank you | 20:25 |
| ttx | ok, it's out | 20:26 |
| ttx | dolphm: I'll cut keystone RC2 tomorrow morning if https://review.openstack.org/#/c/126569/ merges and nobody raised red flags | 20:28 |
| SergeyLukjanov | ttx, thanks again, will you make an announce of rc2 for sahara or should I? | 20:31 |
| ttx | doen already | 20:31 |
| SergeyLukjanov | ttx, oh, thx | 20:33 |
| *** markwash__ has quit IRC | 20:43 | |
| ttx | jgriffith: still missing most of the RC2 backports.. I guess I will approve them tomorrow then | 20:46 |
| *** markwash__ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 20:56 | |
| *** david-lyle has quit IRC | 21:06 | |
| *** arnaud has quit IRC | 21:29 | |
| *** arnaud__ has quit IRC | 21:29 | |
| dolphm | ttx: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/126569/ merged and ready for RC2! | 21:33 |
| ttx | dolphm: should we let it bake for the rest of your day and I cut it tomorrow if still green ? | 21:33 |
| dolphm | ttx: sure | 21:34 |
| nikhil_k | ttx: HI | 22:13 |
| nikhil_k | ttx: just wanted to leave a note - got a few +2s on https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance/+bug/1367771 ( https://review.openstack.org/#/c/120432/ ), if that would be sufficient to mark it for rc2 | 22:17 |
| *** mikal has quit IRC | 22:21 | |
| *** mikal has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 22:23 | |
| *** david-lyle has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 22:33 | |
| *** flaper87 is now known as flaper87|afk | 22:39 | |
| *** markwash__ has quit IRC | 22:40 | |
| *** markwash__ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 22:56 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!