Thursday, 2014-09-04

*** markwas__ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office00:06
*** flaper87 is now known as flaper87|afk00:08
*** devananda has joined #openstack-relmgr-office00:11
*** markwash__ has quit IRC00:12
*** dhellmann_ has quit IRC00:12
*** devanand1 has quit IRC00:12
*** dhellmann has joined #openstack-relmgr-office00:12
*** markwas__ has quit IRC00:30
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-relmgr-office02:59
*** david-lyle has quit IRC03:44
*** morganfainberg_Z is now known as morganfainberg04:29
*** flaper87|afk is now known as flaper8706:12
*** markwash__ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office06:30
*** stevebaker has quit IRC07:04
*** stevebaker has joined #openstack-relmgr-office07:06
*** markwash__ has quit IRC08:53
*** markwash__ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office08:53
*** markwash__ has quit IRC08:55
johnthetubaguyttx: we should talk about Nova soon I guess09:58
ttxjohnthetubaguy: whenever is a good time for you09:58
ttxI'm leaving for lunch in ~20 min09:58
ttxSo we can do that now09:59
johnthetubaguyah, cool09:59
johnthetubaguythinking about doing a final pass through things, just to check what is left in the gate I guess09:59
johnthetubaguyis an etherpad best for tracking that?09:59
ttxhmm, maybe yes10:00
ttxyou create it, or should I10:00
* ttx creates10:01
ttxhttps://etherpad.openstack.org/p/SC1ILk7zMT10:01
johnthetubaguycool10:02
johnthetubaguyso ironic10:03
johnthetubaguyI think I need to −2 those now10:03
ttxwhy?10:03
johnthetubaguyno approvals10:03
ttxAh yes, that sounds like a good reason10:04
ttxMaybe move it to RC1 ?10:04
johnthetubaguyalthough, its kinda got a blocking patch already, maybe I will just add a process −2 to that one10:04
johnthetubaguyyeah, move to RC1 seems best10:04
ttxand not -210:04
johnthetubaguyI moved one there already10:04
johnthetubaguyyeah10:05
ttxAll the partial ones or "juno work" ones can probably be marked implemened and have reamining stuff -2ed/frozen?10:07
johnthetubaguyyeah, just looking at this one though10:07
johnthetubaguyit might be some cleanup that we kinda gave an exception to, so SRIOV has a chance of getting in shame10:08
johnthetubaguyshape^10:08
johnthetubaguybut −2 till we grant the real exception I guess10:08
ttxack10:09
johnthetubaguywill sort that when you go for lunch10:09
ttxthat one is blocked in the check thing, we can keep it in10:10
ttxalthough 755 is already failed10:10
johnthetubaguyah, OK10:11
ttxyay, 5 changes up10:12
ttxI can tag cinder and ceilometer now :)10:13
johnthetubaguyhmm, my network connection is going flakey again :(10:14
ttxon v3-api-schema there are two W-210:17
ttxare they necessary or not?10:17
ttxi.e. are we waiting on 4, or 6?10:18
johnthetubaguyI think its just that one patch really10:19
johnthetubaguythe rest are not approved, so −2ed them10:19
johnthetubaguyits only partially up for review anyways10:19
ttxah, so WIP10:19
ttxi.e. partial10:19
johnthetubaguyyeah, blueprint is partial10:19
johnthetubaguycut it in bits at feature proposal freeze10:20
ttxso we can mark implmented anyway, as long as we -2 the ones that are not currently gating10:20
johnthetubaguyyeah, just wondering about the one that could go though the gate again10:20
johnthetubaguyalthough, given the amount waiting, we should just kill that one I guess10:20
ttxyes, if one more doesn't really change anything, let's leave that slot for something else10:21
johnthetubaguyyeah10:21
ttxwow, long list10:22
ttxcan't see how they can all possibly make it tbh10:22
johnthetubaguyyeah, agreed10:23
ttxwill take at least 3 days for the gate to digest them10:23
johnthetubaguylets come back to it, thinking we have to −2 the lot10:23
johnthetubaguythere is no point merging half of that, as far as I can tell10:23
ttxpeople will come at us with FFEs and stuff that's already approved is more liekly to get it10:23
johnthetubaguythey have three cores on there, so FFE, yeah10:23
ttxA this point it's fine to keep small series, or stuff that's all gating10:24
ttxno point in keeping the others and axing them at the end of the day10:25
johnthetubaguyyeah, thats a good point10:25
johnthetubaguyhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/103859/10:25
johnthetubaguyits dropped out the gate10:25
ttxbecause a mixed bag of 8 with stuff stuck in check gate is really not going to make it10:25
ttxeven if we tag tomorrow morning10:25
johnthetubaguyyeah10:26
johnthetubaguywhat do you think about this next one:10:26
johnthetubaguyhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/103859/10:26
johnthetubaguyits only one, but its not in the gate, and its low priority10:26
ttxIt has a 2% chance I'd say10:27
ttxbut i'm ok to play10:27
johnthetubaguyyeah, I think we have to −2 these10:27
ttxoh, it's on the check pipe10:27
ttxit's fine to keep it in list, maybe it can make it in 24 hours10:28
johnthetubaguyhmm, OK10:28
johnthetubaguyttx: you good checking the ballon memory thing, similar I think10:29
ttxyep10:29
johnthetubaguyright, lets kill serial ports10:30
johnthetubaguyreducing those big two sets of patches should clear things up10:31
johnthetubaguy(in the gate I mean)10:31
ttxyep10:32
johnthetubaguyso v2 on v3, looks like that needs to be killed now10:33
johnthetubaguyway too much not approved10:33
ttxack10:33
johnthetubaguyI gave it extra time, given all the fun API v2.1 has had, but yeah, out of time now10:33
johnthetubaguyI spoke to chris about that, he seemed OK about it, in general terms10:34
johnthetubaguyttx: you want to check how https://review.openstack.org/#/c/94915/ is doing?10:35
ttxgating now10:35
ttxin gate pipe10:35
johnthetubaguysweet, it has a chance10:35
ttxyes, I'd say 20%10:35
ttxbest odds so far10:35
johnthetubaguythats fair10:35
johnthetubaguylol10:35
johnthetubaguyawesome, seems like we have a plan now10:39
ttxOk, that's 4 to keep10:39
ttxI'm tracking all the nova reviews10:39
johnthetubaguyyep, awesome, thank you10:39
ttxThat's 5 of them10:39
johnthetubaguyOK, so I will do the −2 thing, and paper work for the others10:40
johnthetubaguythanks for that10:40
johnthetubaguyhave a good lunch!10:40
ttxok10:41
ttxSo only 24 changes are actually targeted to j3 at this point, of all this check/gate pipes10:41
ttx(313 in check, 63 in gate)10:42
ttxSo I still think prioritization could help a bit10:42
johnthetubaguyprioritization?10:42
ttxbecause the noise definitely doesn't help in getting our targets in10:42
ttxwell, have some stronger "can't gate today if not targeted" thing10:42
johnthetubaguyah, yes, that would be really useful10:43
ttxa bit more discipline on FF day10:43
johnthetubaguyyeah, and the day before, ideally10:43
ttxbecause soft calls don't cut it10:43
ttxok, I run10:43
johnthetubaguyit seems we are really bad at it :(10:43
johnthetubaguycool, catch you later, thank you!10:43
johnthetubaguyso should have done this yesterday, sorry about that, I went soft10:45
*** flaper87 is now known as echo12:11
*** echo is now known as flaper8712:11
ttxKiall: o/12:29
Kiallttx: heya12:29
ttxhttps://launchpad.net/designate/+milestone/juno-312:29
ttxAll ready to tag ?12:29
KiallSo, I know you're more than busy today.. happy to keep it short :)12:29
KiallYes - designate j3 is good to go12:30
ttxok, will tag now then12:30
KiallThere's a readme change in the gate, but it's got no hope of landing anyway ;)12:30
ttxdo you have lots of feature freeze exceptions ?12:30
KiallI was going to ask.. We have 1 we'd like to do, but I'm unsure of the process12:30
ttxI see one up12:30
ttxas incubated you just decide on them12:30
KiallOK - Nice and easy12:30
ttxI'm only involved as far as it can disrupt the integrated release12:31
KiallCode is done, needs a rebase, but that didn't happen in time :(12:31
KiallOkay - Perfect...12:31
ttxand at this point you can't (yet)12:31
ttxok, will tag now12:31
KiallExcellent :)12:31
ttxand ping you when it's done12:31
ttxso the idea at this point is to reject featureful changes unless you get them a clear exception12:32
ttxthat lets us communicate clearly what gets a free pass12:32
KiallYep - Understood, stability+stability+stability :)12:32
ttxvs. what doesn't12:32
KiallOkay, We'll take an official vote in our next weekly meet on the 1 FFE, getting it on record etc etc12:33
ttxif it stays on the juno-rc1 list, it's "on the record"12:33
KiallAh - Ok.12:33
ttxthe goal being to merge them ASAP so that you can focus on stable12:33
ttxok tag done, tarball on its way12:33
Kiall:D12:33
KiallBeyond that, I tagged a client release yesterday.. Then realized that, maybe, I shouldn't be doing that anymore!12:34
ttxno, you tag client releases, that's fine12:34
KiallPerfect - Just wanted to double check :)12:34
* ttx is all for less work12:34
KiallEspecially on days like today :)12:34
ttxthere are calmer days indeed12:35
KiallOkay, that was all I wanted to ask (that can't wait another week). As a heads up, I'd like to try reschedule this meet - Things keep coming up mid-day thursdays -_-12:35
KiallBut - We can discuss next week?12:35
ttxsure12:36
KiallOkay - Well, unless you have anything else.. Cya next week, try not to watch the gate too closely ;)12:37
*** flaper87 is now known as flaper87|afk12:40
ttxI'm hypnotized by it12:40
*** flaper87|afk is now known as flaper8712:42
ttxKiall: tarball up at https://launchpad.net/designate/+milestone/juno-312:43
KiallExcellent! Other than the obvious part of testing it, anything else needed from the designate team for j3?12:44
ttxnope. Checking that the tarball contains what it's supposed to is nice12:44
ttxsince that's like a rehearsal for final12:44
KiallSure, If we see anything wrong, we'll let you know..12:47
Kiallttx: odd, looks like your release script missed 3 of the bugs in designate j3 - they seem to be 3 of the cross-project ones though. Is that expected? https://launchpad.net/designate/+milestone/juno-313:04
ttxKiall: oh. yes, Launchpad timeouts.13:05
ttxKiall: I need to keep retying them13:05
KiallHeh.. Typical ;)13:05
ttxor you can try :)13:05
ttxIt usually takes something like 12 tries13:05
KiallSure.. I'll do them.13:05
ttxsometimes removing the milestone target helps.13:05
ttxdancing around the computer, too.13:05
ttxI heard someone mentioning candles and lambs13:06
ttxbut haven't tried it yet13:06
ttxdolphm: o/13:08
jgriffithttx: ping13:08
ttxjgriffith: o/13:08
jgriffithttx: morning sir...13:08
ttxjgriffith: so I haven't tagged, becaus ethere are spurious extra BPs trying to make it in the gate13:08
ttxlike https://review.openstack.org/#/c/114336/13:09
jgriffithttx: grrrrr13:09
ttxor https://review.openstack.org/#/c/109481/13:09
ttxso I can tag now, but if those merge they will get an automatic FFE13:09
ttxI'm fine with that, just wanted to talk to you about it first13:10
jgriffithI'm fine on the second (had planned giving it one anyway)13:10
jgriffiththe first one kinda ticks me off, but oh well13:10
jgriffithso, we can wait if that works for you13:10
ttxif somehow it fails and falls back in check, you can axe it13:10
jgriffithworks for me13:10
ttxat this point I'd rather not wait and tag13:11
jgriffithI did come up with something last night that I wanted to run by you13:11
jgriffithttx: https://github.com/openstack/cinder/commit/d10fb796f491152486e394481e920479bab9e3d113:11
jgriffiththis was prep work for a follow up that didn't make it13:11
jgriffithit's "dead" code as is right now13:11
jgriffithconsidering whether I should revert it13:12
jgriffithprior to releasing Juno13:12
ttxsure you can file a RC1 bug so that it doesn't fall off the radar13:12
ttxnot that great to ship dead code13:12
jgriffiththat was the question13:12
jgriffithRC bug it is13:12
jgriffith:(13:12
jgriffithSo if you want to tag I'm good with that13:13
jgriffithand the FFE's for those are *ok*13:13
jgriffithI fear people will sneak more through the longer we wait13:13
ttxyeah, i'll tag, push the two in the pipe in the RC1 list, depending on how they perform we'll keep them there or not13:13
jgriffithttx: sounds good13:13
jgriffithI'm travelling most of the day but will be in and out when I can13:13
ttxtag on its way13:13
jgriffithttx: thanks13:13
ttxthere are a few others in the pipe13:15
ttxjgriffith: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/112124/13:15
ttxThe "partially implements" there doesn't sound very good13:15
ttxalso can't find datera-driver BP13:16
*** mestery has quit IRC13:17
jgriffithttx: yeah13:17
ttxoh it's there, just marked implemented.13:17
jgriffithI've asked them NOT to do that13:17
ttxI'll reopen it13:17
ttxmaybe you can -2 it and it will fall off radar13:18
jgriffithttx: the driver maintainers are tieing their commit of the feature to the core features bp as partial13:18
ttxjgriffith: will you be around tomorrow morning so that we quickly go through your FFE list?13:19
jgriffithdone13:19
jgriffithyeah13:19
ttxcool, talk to you tomorrow then! tag on its way13:19
jgriffithI'll have to figure out what to do with the angry masses that want replication and CG's in their driver13:19
jgriffithbut those features just landed this past week in core, so IMO they're SOL (including myself)13:19
*** mestery has joined #openstack-relmgr-office13:21
*** mestery has quit IRC13:21
*** mestery has joined #openstack-relmgr-office13:22
ttxmestery: o/13:22
ttxthe revert merged13:23
ttxchanges for  bsn-ml2-bind-ivs and bsn-ml2-ext-attach still in queue13:23
mesteryttx: o/13:23
mesteryYay!13:23
ttxa bit deep in it13:23
mesteryttx: We can skip those, I've added them as FFEs if that's ok?13:23
ttxyes, that sounds good13:23
mesteryCool13:23
ttx"technical FFE"13:23
mesteryExactly13:23
ttxok, will tag in a few13:24
mesteryThank you ttx! I appreciate all the awesome work you do managing these releases.13:24
mesteryOne more thing: Will we have a quick discussion tomorrow around FFEs?13:24
ttxmestery: I'll be around for it, yes13:24
mesteryttx: Awesome!13:25
dolphmttx: belated o/13:28
ttxdolphm: so I think k2k is still struggling13:29
dolphmttx: yeah, it's only had one chance through the gate :( got stuck in the check queue for ever13:29
ttxlooks like it would be your only FFE and it's a technical one (so i expect it to merge in less than one week)13:29
ttxhow about we tag now and grant FFE ?13:29
dolphmttx: works for me, but what about https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/135000013:30
ttxit's a nice number13:30
dolphmlol that's what everyone says13:30
dolphmttx: we normally avoid wishlist bugs past FF13:30
ttxdolphm: Ideally we would cover it with a BP and grant it FFE13:31
ttxat least while the discussion goes13:31
ttxit's like "switch default to ..."13:31
ttxthat will help communicate that it might still be coming up13:31
ttxdolphm: would that work ?13:35
dolphmttx: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/uuid-as-default-token-provider13:36
ttxthat said it's a bit late for that type of chnage, so better make up your mind soon13:37
dolphmttx: it's been approved for a couple days :(13:37
ttxah? hm13:37
ttxwhich review number?13:37
dolphmttx: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/110488/13:37
ttxah oh, just saw the -1s13:38
ttxit's nowhere in the queue13:38
ttxI fear you forgot to +213:38
ttxand just APRVed13:38
dolphmdoes that matter? it's been through the gate once, and has been stuck trying to get a clean check13:38
ttxah, ok, so it's just waiting for the reenqueueing13:39
dolphmfailed gate about 22 hours ago13:39
ttxI saw it nowhere13:39
ttxyeh, now it won't be in until Sunday13:39
dolphmttx: i just hit recheck 7 minutes ago13:39
dolphmttx: last failed check about an hour ago13:39
ttxok, so i'm pushing k2k to rc1 and tag?13:40
dolphmttx: +113:40
ttxI'm pretty sure adding a few more hours won't change the score here13:40
ttxit needs a few more days13:40
dolphmttx: ++13:41
ttxok, will tag as soon as zuul is finished processing events, still stuck not showing up my neutron tag13:41
ttxdolphm: we'll talk together tomorrow to discuss any other FFE submitted13:42
dolphmttx: i don't think we'll have any beyond those two13:42
ttxok, both are OK imho13:43
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-relmgr-office14:10
ttxmestery: tag in, you're feature frozen14:22
ttxkeystone on its way14:22
mesteryttx: Excellent! Thank you!14:30
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-relmgr-office14:31
ttxdavid-lyle: o/14:32
david-lylettx :o/14:32
ttxso the last patch (94450) is still lost in the depths of the queue14:33
ttxthere was one patch gating on top of queue but it just failed14:33
ttxdavid-lyle: so i propose we tag now and we push to RC1 the last bp14:33
ttx(add-attributes-for-table-cells)14:34
ttxor defer to kilo if you prefer14:34
ttxbut since it's in queue it might just end up merged anyway14:34
david-lylemoving to rc1 is fine with me14:34
david-lylethen we can tag what's there now14:34
ttxok, will tag in a minute14:34
ttxdavid-lyle: will talk to you tmorrow about the FFEs ?14:35
david-lylesure14:35
ttxdavid-lyle: cool, thx14:35
david-lylesuccess rate was actually higher than I imagined, so I'm happy14:36
SergeyLukjanovttx, 112159 is now in gate pipeline15:02
ttxjohnthetubaguy: we'll tag when you get up tomorrow morning -- just ping me when you're up15:13
ttxSergeyLukjanov: same for Sahara but that's when I get up.15:14
johnthetubaguyttx: OK, cool, thanks15:14
ttxstevebaker, SlickNik: i'll be around at 18:30 UTC for the final calls on Heat and Trove15:15
ttxjraim__: ready to talk Barbican when you are15:15
ttxdavid-lyle: horizon completed.15:16
ttxflaper87: ready to talk Zaqar when you are15:16
flaper87ttx: o/15:16
flaper87I'm ready15:16
ttxhttps://launchpad.net/zaqar/+milestone/juno-315:16
ttxI see one blueprint still in progress15:16
ttxtwo changes up the zaqar gate15:17
flaper87Yup, I was told a FFE is going to be sent. Waiting for that email and feedback from other folks before moving it to rc1/K15:17
ttxflaper87: you can make the call on FFE yourself, being just incubated15:17
ttxmaybe I should wait for those 2 to make it, and then tag ?15:18
flaper87ttx: cool, I wanted to follow the m-l process15:18
flaper87ttx: yes, I was going to say that. I'd like to have those 2 changes in j-315:18
ttxflaper87: ML process is good practice, lets everyone chime in on merits15:18
flaper87I mean, before you cut the tag15:18
ttxhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/118394/ and https://review.openstack.org/#/c/118413/15:18
flaper87other than that, everything seems to be under control15:18
ttxOK, will tag if they both make it, and ping you if they don't15:19
flaper87exactly15:19
flaper87those 215:19
flaper87ttx: sure thing, thanks15:19
ttxdhellmann: let me know when would be a good time to tag oslo-incubator and mark bugs closed15:20
ttxdevananda: we can talk Ironic when I'm back around 18:30 UTC15:21
jraim__ttx: ready when you are15:35
ttxjraim__: o/15:36
ttxhttps://launchpad.net/barbican/+milestone/juno-315:36
jraim__sorry about the lag, got involved in some sales nonsense15:36
ttxyou have 2 blueprints listed still in progress15:36
ttxI suspect those will land post-j3 timeframe15:37
ttx?15:37
jraim__yep. Last time I checked, they aren't going to land for j3. I'm waiting to see if they are going to be stable enough for exemptions15:37
jraim__or if they are going to be pushed to K15:37
ttxjraim__: OK.. maybe we can push them to the RC1 milestone for the time being, and then I can tag ?15:38
ttxor is there a commit in the pipe you'd like to see included ?15:38
* ttx can't find one on zuul15:38
jraim__that seems good, let me check with redrobot and make sure (I've been out the last couple of days)15:38
redrobothi15:39
redrobotso both blueprints have like 4/5 commits checked in15:39
redrobotI think we can push both of them to RC1 since I expect the last commits to land this week15:39
ttxjraim__: ok, move them and I'll tag.15:40
jraim__sounds good15:41
ttxtag and tarball on their way15:42
devanandattx: o/15:44
ttxdevananda: hey!15:45
ttxdevananda: you survived!15:45
* ttx dcc sends a glass a water15:45
devananda:)15:45
devanandastill catching up on everything, probably take a week ...15:45
ttxjraim__: I moved both Bps to rc115:45
ttxjraim__: feel free to move them to kilo instead15:46
ttxdevananda: https://launchpad.net/ironic/+milestone/juno-315:47
ttxdevananda: you still have 3 open blueprints15:48
ttxanything we should wait for before we tag ?15:48
devanandathe ilo BP patch sets were approved and in the queue last i checked15:49
devanandaif they can land, great. if not, i'll do a FFE for them15:49
devanandaas they are ready and very important for us15:49
ttxdevananda: which reviews is the iLO stuff?15:49
ttxtwo just merged15:50
devanandahttps://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:merged+project:openstack/ironic+branch:master+topic:bp/ironic-ilo-virtualmedia-driver,n,z15:50
devanandalooks like it just merged and the BP needs to be updated15:50
ttxso it might just be complete15:50
ttxkewl15:50
devanandahttps://blueprints.launchpad.net/ironic/+spec/uefi-boot-for-ironic has some open patches not yet approved15:50
devanandaok, two of those BP are done, that one ^ is not15:51
devanandaI'll update and check with the team, but we should be able to tag today15:52
ttxjraim__: barbican done15:52
ttxdevananda: I'll be back around 18:30 UTC if you want to tag then15:53
devanandaack15:53
*** markmcclain has quit IRC15:53
ttxflaper87: zaqar changes merged. Will push api-v1.1-response-document-changes to RC1 and tag15:59
flaper87ttx: damn, you beat me :P15:59
flaper87ttx: sounds good to me15:59
ttxok, will tag in a couple minutes16:00
devanandattx: confirmed with team - good to tag ironic now. The UEFI work isn't ready today.16:07
devanandawe may FFE this BP https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ironic/+spec/uefi-boot-for-ironic16:08
ttxdevananda: ok, let's move it to rc1 tag16:09
ttxdone16:09
ttxtag on its way16:09
ttxwill also move te bugs out16:09
devanandattx: thanks much!16:10
ttxflaper87: zaqar done16:12
flaper87ttx: awesome, thanks!16:14
ttxdevananda: ironic done16:25
ttxdinner time! Will be back at 18:3016:25
ttxutc16:25
devanandattx: cheers! thanks again16:26
* ttx grabs beer16:26
*** markwash__ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office16:37
*** markwash__ has quit IRC16:37
*** johnthetubaguy is now known as zz_johnthetubagu17:09
SlickNikttx: o/17:11
SlickNikStill waiting on a couple of reviews to make their way through the gate for Trove17:11
SlickNikhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/79850/17:12
SlickNikand https://review.openstack.org/#/c/92701/17:12
SlickNikthanks for jumping on that last one ^ to recheck it17:12
*** markwash__ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office17:33
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-relmgr-office17:48
dhellmannttx: I think we're close to ready. This is just a tag, not a branch, right? so we can land some bug fixes without having to backport them18:16
ttxdhellmann: just a tag. We can do it tomorrow when you get up18:32
dhellmannttx: ok, let's plan on that18:33
ttxSlickNik: how about I tag it tomorrow morning when I get up18:35
ttxSlickNik: if they are not through, too bad, I'll punt to rc118:35
ttx92701 is a bit deep18:36
ttxmarkwash__: ping18:37
ttxstevebaker: ping18:37
ttxSlickNik: does that work for you?18:37
markwash__ttx: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/44355/ and https://review.openstack.org/#/c/111483/ are struggling through the gate18:41
*** markmcclain has quit IRC18:41
ttxmarkwash__: I can apply the same plan I just proposed to slicknik18:41
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-relmgr-office18:41
ttxmarkwash__: I tag first thing tomorrow morning18:41
ttxI defer to RC1 anything that's not in18:41
ttxmarkwash__: you can play retry all day18:42
ttxmarkwash__: does that work?18:42
markwash__ttx: wfm18:42
ttxstevebaker: ping me when around18:47
*** markmcclain has quit IRC19:04
stevebakerttx, \o19:07
ttxstevebaker: some network troubles, so if I disappear don't worry19:08
stevebakerok19:08
ttxstevebaker: so the two patchseries are still very much stuck in queue19:08
ttxstevebaker: we can wait until my tomorrow morning, but I wouldn't place too much hope on it19:09
ttxstevebaker: How about I tag in my tomorrow morning, and defer anything that's not completely in?19:09
ttxstevebaker: defer to RC119:09
stevebakerok, Its just a tag, not a branch right?19:09
ttxyeah, just tag19:10
ttxstevebaker: trick being of course, that you already have a lot deferred to RC119:10
stevebakerthat list will get shorter ;)19:10
ttxstevebaker: if you cut a couple from the list, I'm fine with it19:10
ttxthose two would be "technical" FFEs19:10
ttxi.e. just exceptions because they need the weekend to merge19:11
ttxso their disruption is limited19:11
ttxstevebaker: does that sound like a plan?19:11
stevebakerI'm fairly sure the 3 Lows can be deferred to K. Should I be marking the Delivery Deferred and leave them in juno-rc1?19:12
ttxstevebaker: or you just remove the milestone target19:12
stevebakerok. Plan sounds good19:12
stevebakerso now is an appropriate time to -2 features?19:13
ttxstevebaker: yes19:13
* stevebaker gets out the ban hammer19:14
ttxOK, I'll connect back in 90min to check the temperature19:14
ttxotherwise I'll just push the missing tags (Glance, Trove, Heat, Nova) first thing tomorrow morning19:14
ttxand axe whatever didn't make it by then.19:15
ttxoh, and Sahara.19:15
SlickNikttx: sounds good to me. Thanks!19:19
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-relmgr-office19:32
*** arnaud has joined #openstack-relmgr-office19:52
*** david-lyle is now known as david-lyle_afk20:22
*** david-lyle_afk has quit IRC20:23
*** flaper87 is now known as flaper87|afk20:24
*** david-lyle_afk has joined #openstack-relmgr-office20:28
*** david-lyle_afk has quit IRC20:29
*** david-lyle_afk has joined #openstack-relmgr-office20:30
*** david-lyle_afk has quit IRC20:30
*** david-lyle_afk has joined #openstack-relmgr-office20:30
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-relmgr-office20:32
*** david-lyle_afk has quit IRC20:32
*** david-lyle has quit IRC20:58
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-relmgr-office20:58
*** arnaud has quit IRC21:00
*** markwash__ has quit IRC21:13
*** markwash__ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office21:24
*** david-lyle has quit IRC21:34
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-relmgr-office21:40
*** markmcclain has quit IRC21:45
*** arnaud has joined #openstack-relmgr-office21:52
*** david-lyle has quit IRC22:27
*** markwash__ has quit IRC22:29
*** markwash__ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office22:30

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!