*** markmcclain1 has quit IRC | 00:36 | |
*** david-lyle has quit IRC | 02:31 | |
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 04:02 | |
*** david-lyle has quit IRC | 04:07 | |
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 05:03 | |
*** david-lyle has quit IRC | 05:07 | |
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 06:04 | |
*** david-lyle has quit IRC | 06:08 | |
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 07:05 | |
*** david-lyle has quit IRC | 07:09 | |
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 08:05 | |
ttx | johnthetubaguy: we can do it now or a bit later (12:30 UTC ?) | 08:05 |
---|---|---|
ttx | or 09:30 UTC ? | 08:06 |
*** david-lyle has quit IRC | 08:10 | |
johnthetubaguy | ttx: hey, sorry for being late, forgot how long IRC would take to sync | 08:10 |
johnthetubaguy | ttx: I am up for waiting for mikal to come online, but he might be tied up anyways | 08:11 |
johnthetubaguy | epic review backlog, kinda as usually, perhaps a little worse than normal: https://launchpad.net/nova/+milestone/juno-3 | 08:12 |
ttx | hi! | 08:14 |
ttx | #startmeeting ptl_sync | 08:14 |
openstack | Meeting started Tue Aug 26 08:14:50 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is ttx. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 08:14 |
openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 08:14 |
openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'ptl_sync' | 08:14 |
ttx | #topic Nova | 08:14 |
ttx | #link https://launchpad.net/nova/+milestone/juno-3 | 08:15 |
ttx | #info 8 implemented, 50 in review | 08:16 |
ttx | It's not totally bad -- but yes, you need to seriously increase the conversion rate here | 08:16 |
ttx | go from 5 to 25. | 08:17 |
ttx | :) | 08:17 |
ttx | johnthetubaguy: how close are the "High" ones ? | 08:17 |
johnthetubaguy | ttx: I am told very close | 08:19 |
johnthetubaguy | so ironic is risky, but we really want it | 08:19 |
ttx | It would be... safer to merge them this week basically | 08:19 |
ttx | (or at least most of them) | 08:19 |
johnthetubaguy | right, I think these are ones that get exceptions if they don't make it, but I need to dig a big further, I might demote the scheduler libriary | 08:20 |
johnthetubaguy | yeah, ironic will be to the wire I think, but lets see | 08:20 |
ttx | At least now the list is finite | 08:20 |
johnthetubaguy | true :) | 08:21 |
ttx | and easily prioritized | 08:21 |
johnthetubaguy | yeah, we have lots of mediums, I should probably check up on those, and try to demote the ones that are slipping | 08:21 |
ttx | This is really review money time (now) | 08:21 |
*** fishcried has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 08:21 | |
ttx | next week is the milestone week, I wouldn't expect that much work to get through | 08:22 |
ttx | Any specific event (like a review day) planned? | 08:23 |
johnthetubaguy | not at this point | 08:23 |
johnthetubaguy | its a good idea though | 08:23 |
ttx | It could help in getting a few that are at 99% landed | 08:24 |
johnthetubaguy | yeah, maybe try for Thursday or Friday as a review day | 08:24 |
ttx | Or just a review-specific meeting | 08:24 |
ttx | single out the ones that are almost there, and give them the final push | 08:24 |
johnthetubaguy | yeah, we can try do that informally on IRC | 08:25 |
johnthetubaguy | I guess | 08:25 |
ttx | ok | 08:25 |
ttx | We'll track further progress during the week | 08:25 |
johnthetubaguy | honestly, I feel like I need more insight into how close all these blueprints are | 08:25 |
johnthetubaguy | its a bit opaque right now | 08:26 |
johnthetubaguy | yeah, would be good to catch up later in the week | 08:26 |
ttx | I agree that the status is too granular | 08:26 |
johnthetubaguy | my plan is, I need to do some more reviews, so I will dig in and just see how its all going | 08:27 |
ttx | it works well only for single-review things and there aren't so many of those | 08:27 |
johnthetubaguy | yes, thats true | 08:27 |
ttx | anything else you wanted to mention? | 08:27 |
ttx | Any topic for the meeting today? | 08:28 |
johnthetubaguy | I don't think so, I guess I will try demote the priority of a few blueprints where they don't seem close | 08:28 |
*** fishcried has left #openstack-relmgr-office | 08:28 | |
johnthetubaguy | nothing really to filter up | 08:28 |
johnthetubaguy | well, I guess, the slots ideas are still cooking | 08:28 |
johnthetubaguy | we kinda quietly opened for K specs | 08:28 |
ttx | sssh. | 08:28 |
johnthetubaguy | yeah, sorry | 08:29 |
ttx | don't speak too loud | 08:29 |
johnthetubaguy | :) | 08:29 |
johnthetubaguy | thats exactly my plan... | 08:29 |
johnthetubaguy | we have no intention of reviewing them right now but anyways | 08:29 |
ttx | johnthetubaguy: ok then. I'll be in touch, probably Thursday, to see how well we progressed | 08:29 |
johnthetubaguy | awesome, thanks | 08:29 |
ttx | Thank you! | 08:30 |
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 09:06 | |
*** david-lyle has quit IRC | 09:10 | |
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 10:07 | |
*** david-lyle has quit IRC | 10:12 | |
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 11:08 | |
*** david-lyle has quit IRC | 11:12 | |
ttx | SergeyLukjanov: ready when you are | 12:02 |
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 12:08 | |
SergeyLukjanov | ttx, I'm here | 12:09 |
SergeyLukjanov | ttx, sorry for being a bit later | 12:09 |
ttx | #topic Sahara | 12:10 |
SergeyLukjanov | #link https://launchpad.net/sahara/+milestone/juno-3 | 12:10 |
ttx | #info 7 implemented, 4 under review, 5 inprogress | 12:11 |
ttx | slow progress compared to last week | 12:11 |
ttx | but still on track | 12:12 |
SergeyLukjanov | yup, there were some blockers | 12:12 |
SergeyLukjanov | but I think it's going to be merged till j3 | 12:12 |
*** david-lyle has quit IRC | 12:13 | |
ttx | don't forget gate is likely to explode next week | 12:13 |
ttx | so don't count on Tuesday-Thursday next week that much | 12:13 |
ttx | I would get everything in this week if I were you ;) | 12:13 |
SergeyLukjanov | ttx, yeah, our sahara-ci has been exploaded this weekend :) | 12:13 |
ttx | How is https://blueprints.launchpad.net/sahara/+spec/edp-swift-trust-authentication doing? | 12:14 |
ttx | is there a lot of code missing? | 12:14 |
SergeyLukjanov | not a lot, but some code is still missing | 12:14 |
SergeyLukjanov | I think that all sahara parts of this blueprint will be ready in j3 | 12:15 |
SergeyLukjanov | and will not use FFE for it | 12:15 |
ttx | OK cool. | 12:15 |
ttx | anything you wanted to talk about ? Any topic for the meeting later? | 12:15 |
SergeyLukjanov | I think no topics | 12:16 |
SergeyLukjanov | I'd like to note that sahara@horizon is going good | 12:16 |
SergeyLukjanov | and mostly all of the changes has been merged | 12:16 |
SergeyLukjanov | and we're not going to release dashboard's j3 | 12:16 |
ttx | awesome | 12:16 |
SergeyLukjanov | we need to keep repo fot some more time because of stable/icehouse branch in it | 12:17 |
ttx | SergeyLukjanov: right | 12:17 |
ttx | SergeyLukjanov: ok then, talk to you later | 12:17 |
ttx | dhellmann: around? | 12:17 |
SergeyLukjanov | thank you | 12:17 |
dhellmann | ttx: hi! | 12:17 |
ttx | #topic Oslo | 12:17 |
ttx | dhellmann: hola! | 12:18 |
ttx | dhellmann: I think we have a way forward for the LP tracking now | 12:18 |
dhellmann | the project group? | 12:18 |
ttx | dhellmann: yes. I'll proceed and ask LP admins to move things | 12:18 |
dhellmann | ok, let me know if there's anything you need me to do, too | 12:18 |
ttx | oslo->oslo-incubator and new oslo projectgroup | 12:18 |
ttx | the only thing that I could see malfunctioning is that Lp has a (handy) redirection feature for renamed projects | 12:19 |
ttx | so if you go to lp/svanna you get the lp/sahara page | 12:19 |
dhellmann | ah, and we wouldn't want that turned on | 12:19 |
ttx | but here we want lp/oslo to land on the projectgroup :) | 12:19 |
dhellmann | we could call the group openstack-oslo | 12:20 |
ttx | right, so that's the only left unknown (together with the will of LP admins to accept to create a projectgroup) | 12:20 |
ttx | I guess we could. | 12:20 |
ttx | but oslo would be better I think, if we can have it | 12:20 |
dhellmann | if they can avoid the bad redirect, oslo is fine, sure | 12:20 |
*** ttx has left #openstack-relmgr-office | 12:21 | |
*** ttx has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 12:21 | |
ttx | hm. | 12:21 |
ttx | ctrl-C is too close to ctrl-X apparently | 12:21 |
dhellmann | heh | 12:21 |
ttx | https://launchpad.net/oslo/+milestone/juno-3 | 12:21 |
ttx | I think we established in the past that most of the work here is not FF-sensitive | 12:22 |
ttx | but still, is it time to defer a few things ? | 12:22 |
dhellmann | yeah, at this point I don't expect active adoption of new libraries | 12:22 |
dhellmann | dims started working on the logging stuff yesterday, so that may be done even though it was assigned to me :-) | 12:23 |
ttx | hmm, rootwrap daemon mode should be considered implemented, fixing | 12:23 |
dhellmann | we're behind on some reviews, so we'll be shifting gears to focus on finishing things this week | 12:23 |
dhellmann | has that been released? | 12:23 |
*** gordc has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 12:23 | |
ttx | merged, not released | 12:23 |
ttx | waiting for a few more tests, but we'll release this week | 12:23 |
ttx | one question is shoudl we do 1.3 or 2.0 | 12:24 |
dhellmann | ok, I have a short list of other releases for this week but I'll let you handle that when you're ready | 12:24 |
dhellmann | is the old API still present? | 12:24 |
ttx | yes | 12:24 |
dhellmann | as long as it's still compatible with existing users, you can stay in the 1.x series | 12:24 |
ttx | well, its' not strictly an API, but the old way of using it is preserved | 12:24 |
ttx | ok, makes sense | 12:25 |
dhellmann | well, yeah, that's what I meant | 12:25 |
ttx | 1.3 it is | 12:25 |
ttx | 1.3 ships a client API though for the daemon mode | 12:25 |
dhellmann | that's fine, that's a new feature not a breaking change | 12:25 |
ttx | so we'll have to preserve that starting from now | 12:25 |
dhellmann | do you foresee removing the old command line API? | 12:26 |
ttx | Not really. It's still "more secure" | 12:26 |
ttx | as in simpler. | 12:26 |
dhellmann | ok | 12:26 |
dhellmann | I do have something to bring up with you, to be thinking about for kilo. | 12:27 |
ttx | so do you still plan to cover all the j3 targets ? | 12:27 |
ttx | with some being deferred to rc1 probably ? | 12:27 |
dhellmann | I'm going to review that list today and talk to josh and a couple of other people about their status. I'll have it up to date by tomorrow morning. | 12:28 |
dhellmann | is there an rc1 target yet? | 12:28 |
* ttx tries to wrap his haed around this list but without the incub/lib distinction it's kinda hard | 12:28 | |
dhellmann | yeah, I wish I could tag bps and filter this list | 12:28 |
ttx | in the meantime, i just trust you have things under control :) | 12:29 |
dhellmann | soon enough | 12:29 |
* dhellmann tries not to laugh out loud | 12:29 | |
ttx | dhellmann: so.. kilo | 12:29 |
dhellmann | seriously, I think most of this is going to land at some point in juno, but since we're not rushing to make the ff deadline some is likely to be rc1 or later | 12:29 |
ttx | right | 12:29 |
dhellmann | ok, so, we have recently had some trouble with graduating modules that are dependencies of modules that have not graduated | 12:30 |
dhellmann | for instance, oslo.utils took strutils out of the incubator, but lots of things use strutils and are not graduating | 12:30 |
dhellmann | our original plan was to leave the incubated code alone, but in some cases that makes it harder to adopt because tests in the projects are mocking out the incubated version of a function and some code is calling the non-incubated version | 12:31 |
dhellmann | I think that was actually timeutils, but it doesn't really matter | 12:31 |
ttx | why is it a problem for non-gaduated libs to use graduated libs ? | 12:31 |
dhellmann | well, we didn't want to update the incubated code to use the graduated libs because that meant if anyone needed a patch to the non-graduated code they would *have* to adopt the library at the same time | 12:32 |
dhellmann | but that's turning into too much trouble, so we want to change that | 12:32 |
dhellmann | for kilo, we want to branch early, and then delete things as soon as their graduated library is available for use | 12:32 |
dhellmann | the early branch still gives us a way to backport changes for projects that haven't adopted a library | 12:33 |
dhellmann | although it occurs to me that the branch might just be stable/juno | 12:33 |
ttx | stable/juno shall work for you if you branch early in Kilo, yes | 12:33 |
dhellmann | when would that stable branch normally be cut? | 12:34 |
dhellmann | your "if you branch early" comment makes me think not immediately? | 12:34 |
ttx | we usually did it sometimes between RC1 and release | 12:34 |
dhellmann | ok, that seems like good timing for us | 12:35 |
ttx | i.e. we would tag the "final" juno oslo-incubator when you want it opened for kilo | 12:35 |
ttx | and once the final tag is in, we can branch | 12:35 |
dhellmann | right, and I think earlier is probably better | 12:35 |
dhellmann | I'll need to make sure we have the necessary changes landed first, but I don't think we have much targeted so it shouldn't be an issue | 12:36 |
ttx | although we can do even earlier if needed, nothing "consumes" that anyway | 12:36 |
ttx | testing-wise | 12:36 |
dhellmann | and I will go through the juno planning stuff we put together and make sure the change to deleting modules isn't going to introduce any other weirdness | 12:36 |
ttx | ack | 12:37 |
dhellmann | ok, we might do it when our last planned graduation happens this cycle, then | 12:37 |
dhellmann | that way if we do have juno bug fixes, we have a place to put them | 12:37 |
ttx | Sounds good. anything else you wanted to mention ? Topics for the release meeting ? | 12:37 |
dhellmann | no, that was it | 12:37 |
ttx | dhellmann: thx! | 12:38 |
ttx | gordc: o/ | 12:38 |
dhellmann | ttx: thanks, ttyl! | 12:38 |
gordc | o/ | 12:38 |
ttx | #topic Ceilometer | 12:38 |
ttx | #link https://launchpad.net/ceilometer/+milestone/juno-3 | 12:38 |
gordc | so we have code for all our bps up and ready for review | 12:39 |
ttx | #info 3 implemented, 6 in review, 1 in progress, 1 blocked | 12:39 |
gordc | i think we're making good progress on high priority items... | 12:39 |
gordc | we've gone through several rounds of reviews on those items | 12:39 |
ttx | Is https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+spec/paas-event-format-for-ceilometer code already in review ? | 12:40 |
ttx | it's only marked "good progress" | 12:40 |
gordc | that bp has a patch up as well but i don't believe it's passed jenkins yet so i've left it as good progress for now | 12:40 |
ttx | ok | 12:40 |
gordc | it's been reviewed a few times i believe so i could mark it as review if that's easier to track | 12:40 |
ttx | https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+spec/grenade-resource-survivability still blocked on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/102354 ? | 12:41 |
gordc | yes, that's the one issue we have... i switched the item to blocked recently since we made no progress | 12:42 |
ttx | gordc: if it doesn't need a complete rewrite of the patch, making it "needs code reveiw" will not raise any alarm | 12:42 |
gordc | ok i'll confirm with owner and switch to needs review | 12:42 |
ttx | gordc: could you summarize the issue on grenade-resource-survivability, see if I can help unblock? | 12:42 |
gordc | sure. i'll try my best to summarise | 12:42 |
gordc | from my understanding there is a debate on what we should be testing in grenade test between joe gordon and chris dent. | 12:43 |
gordc | to my knowledge chris is pretty much unsure what to do... just that what he put up for review isn't it. | 12:44 |
gordc | we reached out to joe gordon on thursday at our meeting for clarification and he said he'd contact chris later. | 12:44 |
ttx | might be worth raising that issue at the meeting today | 12:45 |
gordc | i just checked with chris today and he hasn't heard from joe yet so i was probably going to reach out to him today to see if we can get some action | 12:45 |
ttx | we could collect more opinions | 12:45 |
gordc | yeah. that sounds good. | 12:45 |
gordc | i think chris is open to anything. just that we're not sure what 'anything' is at this point | 12:45 |
ttx | #info grenade-resource-survivability blocked pending discussion between jog0 and Chris Dent | 12:46 |
gordc | aside from grenade bp i think we're ok. hoping to get more reviews once eglynn and llu return in next few days | 12:46 |
ttx | I would definitely advise to merge as much as you can this week | 12:47 |
ttx | next week should be a bit busy | 12:47 |
gordc | yeah. i was hoping to get a bit more merged this past week but we were blocked by a gating issue when tox was upgraded in the gates. | 12:48 |
gordc | we have a workaround now so we should be able to make some progress | 12:48 |
ttx | ok, cool | 12:48 |
ttx | gordc: that's all I had | 12:48 |
ttx | gordc: anything else for the meeting tonight ? | 12:48 |
gordc | i think thats all on my end | 12:49 |
gordc | i'll just track the grenade item for onw | 12:49 |
gordc | now* | 12:49 |
ttx | gordc: great, and thanks a lot for stepping up while eglynn was away | 12:49 |
gordc | np. he did a good job doing a brain dump before he left. | 12:49 |
*** gordc has left #openstack-relmgr-office | 13:07 | |
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 13:09 | |
*** david-lyle has quit IRC | 13:13 | |
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 13:57 | |
ttx | jgriffith: around? | 14:01 |
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 14:05 | |
ttx | dolphm: you can go now if you're around | 14:07 |
*** markmcclain1 has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 14:09 | |
*** markmcclain has quit IRC | 14:12 | |
*** markmcclain1 has quit IRC | 14:13 | |
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 14:14 | |
*** markmcclain1 has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 14:15 | |
dolphm | ttx: o/ | 14:16 |
dolphm | would have helped if i had irc open | 14:16 |
ttx | indeed | 14:18 |
ttx | #topic Keystone | 14:18 |
ttx | #link https://launchpad.net/keystone/+milestone/juno-3 | 14:18 |
ttx | #info 3 implemented, 5 in review, 2 in progress, 1 blocked | 14:18 |
*** markmcclain has quit IRC | 14:19 | |
ttx | About the blocked one, I raised a thread and will mention it at the cross-project meeting again | 14:19 |
dolphm | bp non-persistent-tokens (currently good progress) has been a series of roadblocks and hurdles throughout juno - we made a ton of progress, but it doesn't look like it's going to make juno-3 | 14:19 |
dolphm | ttx: thanks | 14:19 |
ttx | I'd like to understand if it('s just "annoying" or "blocking" | 14:19 |
ttx | (the dep thing) | 14:19 |
dolphm | our approach for federating across multiple keystones is to use SAMLv2 (which allows us to federate with non-keystones as well). our approach for generating SAMLv2 docs is with pysaml2 | 14:20 |
dolphm | so it's either re-invent an XML + crypto library or use one off the shelf | 14:21 |
dolphm | steve documented a couple alternatives in the requirements review, but it doesn't sound like any others are a better option | 14:21 |
dolphm | and switching libs would probably mean missing juno | 14:22 |
ttx | yeah, I was wondering if the saml one (which was the less worse alternative) was an option | 14:22 |
ttx | could be good to explore that scenario, just in case we hit a wall | 14:22 |
ttx | but my understanding was that it was a pain generator, not a blocker | 14:22 |
*** markmcclain1 has quit IRC | 14:22 | |
dolphm | that one describes itself as an alpha; but at least has a release this year | 14:23 |
ttx | we could even have a plan to migrate off to saml to remove the pain generator | 14:23 |
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 14:23 | |
ttx | that's what I want us to clear up tonight | 14:23 |
ttx | in the mean time, you need to continue landing stuff, nice progress over the last week | 14:24 |
dolphm | 44 patches to go at this point :( | 14:24 |
ttx | I'd recommend you get as much merged this week as you can :) | 14:25 |
dolphm | of course! | 14:25 |
ttx | We'll review in-week progress in ~2 days | 14:25 |
dolphm | alrighty | 14:26 |
ttx | anything else you wanted to mention ? | 14:26 |
ttx | Anything for the meetign (in addition to the saml discussion) ? | 14:26 |
dolphm | no sir | 14:27 |
ttx | alright, thx! | 14:27 |
ttx | jgriffith: still not around? | 14:28 |
ttx | david-lyle: we can start now if you're available | 14:29 |
david-lyle | ttx: ready | 14:30 |
ttx | #topic Horizon | 14:30 |
ttx | #link https://launchpad.net/horizon/+milestone/juno-3 | 14:30 |
ttx | #info 9 implemented, 38 under code review | 14:30 |
ttx | Still leaves a lot to process :) | 14:30 |
david-lyle | yeah, there are a lot in flight | 14:31 |
david-lyle | quite a few are in good shape just need another review | 14:31 |
david-lyle | a few are still a little less reviewed and may not make the cut | 14:31 |
ttx | david-lyle: ok, you should really push early this week, rather than next week | 14:32 |
david-lyle | definitely | 14:32 |
ttx | I like that all the High targets are in | 14:32 |
david-lyle | but we want to do our part to add to the semi-annual gate jam | 14:32 |
david-lyle | :) | 14:32 |
ttx | You might want to call a specific meeting to get those last reviews the final +2 | 14:33 |
david-lyle | Sounds like a good idea | 14:33 |
ttx | I don't think I can suggest much more from where i stand.. review review review... we'll lok at progress in two days | 14:33 |
ttx | see how fast the wall is approaching | 14:34 |
david-lyle | always too quickly | 14:34 |
ttx | anything you wanted to discuss at the meeting ? You don't seem to have anything blocked | 14:34 |
david-lyle | no, I think reviews are our only hold-up now | 14:35 |
ttx | david-lyle: then I'll let you concentrate on those :) | 14:36 |
ttx | david-lyle: thx! | 14:36 |
david-lyle | thanks | 14:36 |
ttx | mestery: ready when you are | 14:37 |
mestery | \o/ | 14:37 |
ttx | #topic Neutron | 14:37 |
ttx | #link https://launchpad.net/neutron/+milestone/juno-3 | 14:37 |
ttx | #info 10 implemented, 54 in review | 14:37 |
ttx | nice cleanup | 14:38 |
mestery | Thanks, more to come, but I'm working on it everyday at this point. | 14:38 |
ttx | but 1/day velocity won't get you very far when the door closes | 14:38 |
mestery | Agreed. | 14:38 |
mestery | I've already started booting some out which I don't think have a chance at landing. | 14:38 |
ttx | anything planned to give the medium/high a final push? | 14:39 |
ttx | some review-centric meeting? | 14:39 |
ttx | your meetings have had other issues to discuss recently | 14:39 |
mestery | I've been thinking of that, perhaps Thursday this week. | 14:39 |
ttx | so you can't really prioritize reviews there | 14:39 |
mestery | Right | 14:39 |
mestery | Speaking of meetings: I plan to completely revamp the Neutron meeting after Feature Freeze | 14:39 |
mestery | It's become stale | 14:39 |
ttx | yes, thursday this week is about as much you can wait | 14:39 |
mestery | Needs a breath of fresh air | 14:39 |
mestery | ttx: ++ | 14:39 |
ttx | after that, it will get difficult, unless you work on Labor day | 14:40 |
mestery | Totally agree, I'll see if I can set it up for Wednesday actually. | 14:40 |
mestery | That gives us one more day | 14:40 |
ttx | ++ | 14:40 |
ttx | I don't think there is anything I can help unblock, apart from reviews you seem in good shape | 14:41 |
mestery | The good news is we're making progress on many High/Medium community BPs | 14:41 |
mestery | Agreed | 14:41 |
ttx | yes, I would focus the review meeting on medium/high tbh | 14:41 |
mestery | L3 HA, ipset, and security groups RPC refactor are all in good shape. | 14:41 |
mestery | Absolutely | 14:41 |
mestery | Low are "best effort" | 14:41 |
ttx | if time left, you can address low-hanging fruit in Low | 14:41 |
mestery | yes | 14:41 |
ttx | but there won't be (time left) | 14:41 |
mestery | :) | 14:42 |
ttx | Anything you'd like to discuss at meeting today? | 14:43 |
mestery | Is the "PTL vs. czar" thing on the agenda? | 14:43 |
mestery | Or is that a ML thread only thing. | 14:43 |
mestery | Seems project meeting may be a good place to continue that discussion | 14:43 |
ttx | we can discuss that, sure | 14:44 |
ttx | Could you add it to the agenda ? | 14:45 |
mestery | Well, only if others want as well, maybe the ML thread is dieing down now :) | 14:45 |
mestery | Will do | 14:45 |
ttx | thx! | 14:45 |
mestery | np! | 14:45 |
ttx | ok then, talk to you later! | 14:45 |
ttx | jgriffith: still not around? | 14:45 |
mestery | ttx: later and thanks! | 14:46 |
jgriffith | ttx: hey... still up? | 15:22 |
ttx | jgriffith: sure, just a sec | 15:22 |
ttx | jgriffith: hi! | 15:23 |
ttx | #topic Cinder | 15:23 |
jgriffith | ttx: howdy | 15:23 |
ttx | #link https://launchpad.net/cinder/+milestone/juno-3 | 15:24 |
ttx | #info 3 implemented, 16 in review | 15:24 |
jgriffith | :( | 15:24 |
ttx | that's still a lot of review work to complete in 8 days :) | 15:24 |
jgriffith | agreed | 15:24 |
jgriffith | some are pretty far along | 15:24 |
ttx | how are the two medium ones going? | 15:24 |
jgriffith | those are close | 15:25 |
jgriffith | I expect them to get cleaned up and finished in the next day or so | 15:25 |
ttx | would be great to land them this week to remove a bit of pressure | 15:25 |
ttx | cool | 15:25 |
jgriffith | yeah, totally agree | 15:25 |
jgriffith | I've already let it be known drivers are my lowest priority | 15:25 |
ttx | that must make you a very popular person | 15:25 |
jgriffith | There's a couple in there I need to manually update | 15:25 |
jgriffith | ttx: Yeah, I'm loved! | 15:26 |
jgriffith | :) | 15:26 |
ttx | do you think you could benefit from a review meeting where you would give a few targeted blueprints a final +2 push? | 15:26 |
jgriffith | ttx: I'm not sure about the bugs, but at least I know I can work on those after 3 closes | 15:26 |
jgriffith | j3 that is | 15:27 |
ttx | re: bugs; that's what rc1 is for, unless you have critical ones or regressions | 15:27 |
jgriffith | yeah | 15:27 |
jgriffith | that's my plan | 15:27 |
jgriffith | but I'm certain there will be *new* ones once we cut | 15:27 |
jgriffith | based on history at any rate | 15:27 |
jgriffith | everyones's pretty distracted right now, between last minute features/reviews and third prty ci | 15:28 |
ttx | I'll let you go back to it. This week is money time | 15:28 |
jgriffith | I'll have an updated turn on the bp list tomorrow | 15:28 |
jgriffith | well... one today, and another after the meeting tomorrow | 15:28 |
ttx | anything you'd like to discuss at meeting today? | 15:28 |
ttx | i'll look at progress in a couple of days, see how badly we are f*ed | 15:29 |
jgriffith | we could continue the summit talks :) | 15:29 |
jgriffith | ttx: think positive! | 15:29 |
jgriffith | see how amazing the recovery is in 24 hours :) | 15:29 |
ttx | we have merged 15% of the j-3 targets in 80% of the time | 15:29 |
jgriffith | damn you and your statistics | 15:29 |
ttx | how positive is hat | 15:29 |
jgriffith | :) | 15:29 |
ttx | +t | 15:29 |
jgriffith | alright... I'll catch up with you this afternoon | 15:30 |
jgriffith | thanks | 15:30 |
ttx | jgriffith: thx! | 15:30 |
ttx | notmyname: ready when you are | 15:30 |
ttx | unless you want to opsmeetup-skip | 15:30 |
notmyname | ttx: I'm here. I'm in the ops meetup right now | 15:30 |
notmyname | nah, I can space a few minutes | 15:31 |
ttx | notmyname: we can make it quick and painless | 15:31 |
notmyname | thanks for doing the rc tag | 15:31 |
ttx | like a stab in a kidney | 15:31 |
notmyname | heh | 15:31 |
ttx | #topic Swift | 15:31 |
notmyname | I'm reminded that I need to send an email to the ML about the RC | 15:31 |
ttx | #link https://launchpad.net/swift/+milestone/2.1.0 | 15:31 |
ttx | I think I saw one | 15:31 |
notmyname | oh yeah. maybe I didn that | 15:31 |
notmyname | *did | 15:32 |
notmyname | yup. just checked | 15:32 |
ttx | [openstack-dev] [Swift] 2.1.0-rc tagged | 15:32 |
notmyname | I'll be getting LP filled out this week | 15:32 |
ttx | looking good so far? | 15:32 |
notmyname | yes, AFAIK. there wasn't much in it that's concerning. work continues on erasure code work | 15:33 |
ttx | do you think the erasure code stuff would land in the juno final? | 15:33 |
*** markmcclain has quit IRC | 15:33 | |
ttx | or you'd rather introduce it early in kilo when ready | 15:33 |
notmyname | I think it will be very hard to get it in juno. early kilo is more likely. (although there are many people who want it in juno) | 15:34 |
notmyname | #link https://trello.com/b/LlvIFIQs/swift-erasure-codes | 15:34 |
notmyname | that's the living "what's going on" tool | 15:35 |
ttx | I'll be around on monday for your sign-off on the 2.1.0 tag. If you need backports, contact me asap so that we set up the branch | 15:35 |
notmyname | ttx: thanks. will do | 15:35 |
ttx | notmyname: anything you'd like to discuss at meeting today? Or will you be enjoying post-meetup activities? | 15:35 |
notmyname | I'll be in the middle of the ops meetup (facilitating a storage discussion) this afternoon and won't be able to make it) | 15:36 |
ttx | ok, fair enough! | 15:36 |
ttx | talk to you later then | 15:36 |
notmyname | thanks | 15:37 |
ttx | zaneb: ready when you are | 15:37 |
zaneb | o/ | 15:37 |
ttx | #topic Heat | 15:37 |
ttx | #link https://launchpad.net/heat/+milestone/juno-3 | 15:37 |
ttx | #info 3 implemented, 8 in review, 3 in progress | 15:38 |
ttx | that's slow progress in last two weeks, lots of ground left to cover in one week | 15:38 |
ttx | zaneb: how are those two "high" priority ones doing ? | 15:39 |
zaneb | yeah, there are lots of reviews to do | 15:39 |
ttx | cancel-update-stack & update-failure-recovery | 15:39 |
zaneb | mine has not made much progress because I've been debating with you on openstack-dev all week ;) | 15:39 |
zaneb | but it should be a matter of adding a couple of unit tests, most of the patches have been reviewed already | 15:40 |
ttx | zaneb: I'll stop arguing then :) | 15:40 |
ttx | ok, so should land this week ? | 15:40 |
zaneb | yes | 15:40 |
ttx | what about the other one ? | 15:40 |
zaneb | the other one is looking somewhat doubtful | 15:40 |
zaneb | I need to check back on comments on the review | 15:41 |
ttx | would you be requiring a feature freeze exception to get it in? | 15:41 |
ttx | or a few extra days won't hep it | 15:41 |
ttx | +l | 15:41 |
zaneb | I would be inclined not to do a FFE, except that TripleO needs this | 15:42 |
zaneb | I'll have to review the latest comments and see what the scope of any changes is | 15:43 |
ttx | ok | 15:43 |
ttx | https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/stack-display-fields is not assigned -- does it have anybody working on it ? | 15:43 |
* ttx sees Richard Lee | 15:44 | |
ttx | should he be assigned/credited for it? | 15:44 |
zaneb | I think andersonvom | 15:44 |
zaneb | actually, I believe they pair-program | 15:44 |
zaneb | so it's always hard to tell :D | 15:44 |
ttx | damn | 15:45 |
ttx | we need to make sure storyboard is PP-compatible | 15:45 |
ttx | randomly displaying one or the other | 15:45 |
zaneb | looks like it already merged anyway | 15:45 |
ttx | yay win | 15:46 |
ttx | I assigned, you can update status | 15:46 |
zaneb | yeah, I just pinged Richard in #heat for an update | 15:46 |
ttx | OK well, just keep on reviewing, and don't place too much hope in the gate next week, so review now if you have a choice | 15:47 |
zaneb | hah, yes :) | 15:47 |
ttx | anything you'd like to discuss at cross-project meeting today? | 15:47 |
zaneb | I had a question about packaging of functional tests on openstack-dev | 15:47 |
zaneb | might be a good one to discuss quickly while everyone is in one place | 15:47 |
ttx | sure, add it to agenda | 15:48 |
ttx | https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/ProjectMeeting | 15:48 |
zaneb | #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-August/044072.html | 15:48 |
ttx | talk to you later, then? | 15:48 |
zaneb | yep, thanks! | 15:48 |
ttx | SlickNik: ready when you are (our usual time is ok) | 15:50 |
SlickNik | ttx: here now | 15:59 |
ttx | #topic Trove | 15:59 |
ttx | SlickNik: o/ | 15:59 |
SlickNik | o/ | 15:59 |
ttx | #link https://launchpad.net/trove/+milestone/juno-3 | 15:59 |
ttx | #info 8 in review | 16:00 |
ttx | so that's not showing that much progress compared to two weeks ago | 16:00 |
ttx | wasn't your meetup all focused on getting stuff done ? | 16:00 |
SlickNik | We have a couple of pretty big items that we're almost done with. | 16:01 |
SlickNik | Yes, and I think we made good progress at the meetup. | 16:01 |
ttx | I fear you're going to get blocked in gate if you submit those too late... so get them reviewed and merged asap | 16:01 |
SlickNik | Just need to close out a couple of more patches | 16:01 |
SlickNik | Replication and clustering | 16:01 |
SlickNik | Roger that. | 16:01 |
SlickNik | Replication is on track to be implemented today / tomorrow. | 16:01 |
ttx | How is replication coming up ? How far is it ? | 16:02 |
ttx | heh | 16:02 |
ttx | cool | 16:02 |
SlickNik | Of the 7 patches needed - 4 are merged. | 16:02 |
SlickNik | And 2 / 3 have 1 +2 | 16:02 |
ttx | We'll be havign another look at progress in two days, see how fast the wall is approaching | 16:02 |
SlickNik | and 1 is pending to look at today. | 16:03 |
ttx | in the mean time, I'll try to stay out of the way | 16:03 |
ttx | anything you want to discuss at meetign today ? Anything blocking you? | 16:03 |
SlickNik | Nothing blocking, just trying to get stuff moved through the pipeline. :) | 16:04 |
SlickNik | btw, one of the things we discussed at the mid-cycle is that we want to move to a trove-specs process. | 16:04 |
ttx | awesome! | 16:05 |
ttx | starting with Kilo I suspect | 16:05 |
SlickNik | One of the big challenges we have is being able to review BPs offline, and trove-core unanimously felt that having the specs in gerrit will really help here. | 16:05 |
ttx | #info Trove to adopt -specs for Kilo | 16:05 |
SlickNik | ttx: yes, starting with Kilo | 16:05 |
ttx | SlickNik: ok, anoything else coming out of the meetup? | 16:06 |
SlickNik | after juno-3, I'll work on getting the infra set up for that. | 16:06 |
SlickNik | Not much else interesting from a cross project perspective. | 16:07 |
ttx | ok, talk to you later then | 16:07 |
SlickNik | A lot of conversations trying to get on the same page with patches in flight, and reviews. | 16:07 |
ttx | hmm, ok | 16:07 |
ttx | Anyone here to represent glance ? | 16:08 |
SlickNik | Talk to you in a bit. | 16:08 |
SlickNik | Thanks ttx! | 16:08 |
ttx | SlickNik: thx! | 16:08 |
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 16:38 | |
*** markmcclain has quit IRC | 16:38 | |
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 16:51 | |
*** johnthetubaguy is now known as zz_johnthetubagu | 18:20 | |
*** arnaud has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 18:29 | |
ttx | #endmeeting | 19:29 |
openstack | Meeting ended Tue Aug 26 19:29:53 2014 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 19:29 |
openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ptl_sync/2014/ptl_sync.2014-08-26-08.14.html | 19:29 |
openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ptl_sync/2014/ptl_sync.2014-08-26-08.14.txt | 19:29 |
openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ptl_sync/2014/ptl_sync.2014-08-26-08.14.log.html | 19:29 |
*** sdague has quit IRC | 19:31 | |
*** sdague has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 19:51 | |
*** arnaud has quit IRC | 19:58 | |
*** morganfainberg is now known as morganfainberg_Z | 20:49 | |
*** markmcclain has quit IRC | 21:12 | |
*** morganfainberg_Z is now known as morganfainberg | 21:33 | |
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 21:54 | |
*** markmcclain has quit IRC | 21:54 | |
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 21:56 | |
*** zbitter has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 22:26 | |
*** david-ly_ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 22:36 | |
*** zaneb has quit IRC | 22:37 | |
*** zbitter is now known as zaneb | 22:38 | |
*** david-lyle has quit IRC | 22:38 | |
*** dansmith has quit IRC | 22:43 | |
*** devananda has quit IRC | 22:43 | |
*** devananda has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 22:43 | |
*** dansmith- has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 22:43 | |
*** dansmith- is now known as dansmith | 22:43 | |
*** dansmith is now known as Guest61572 | 22:44 | |
*** david-ly_ is now known as david-lyle | 23:04 | |
*** markmcclain has quit IRC | 23:07 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!