| *** markmcclain has quit IRC | 00:45 | |
| *** markmcclain has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 00:53 | |
| *** david-lyle has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 02:44 | |
| *** markmcclain has quit IRC | 02:59 | |
| *** markwash has quit IRC | 03:47 | |
| *** markwash has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 03:50 | |
| *** morganfainberg is now known as morganfainberg_Z | 09:46 | |
| *** david-lyle has quit IRC | 09:55 | |
| ttx | dhellmann: o/ | 12:14 |
|---|---|---|
| dhellmann | good morning, ttx | 12:14 |
| dhellmann | well, afternoon :-) | 12:14 |
| ttx | So, we need to decide when to cut a stable/icehouse branch for oslo-incubator | 12:15 |
| ttx | and mark bugs fixreleased | 12:15 |
| ttx | and push a tag | 12:15 |
| ttx | there is little point in cutting a "milestone-proposed" branch there | 12:15 |
| dhellmann | right | 12:15 |
| ttx | sice we don't really do tarballs | 12:15 |
| dhellmann | what have you done in the past? | 12:15 |
| dhellmann | I can see waiting until all the other branches are cut, and I can see going ahead and doing it now | 12:16 |
| ttx | I think at some point we said: "oh! we should probably do one, don't we" and we did it | 12:16 |
| dhellmann | haha | 12:16 |
| ttx | I guess it's more a question of when you want to unfreeze oslo-incubator for features | 12:16 |
| ttx | if you ever did | 12:16 |
| dhellmann | we also need to decide whether to do the same for all the libs | 12:16 |
| dhellmann | markmc was going to handle oslo.messaging | 12:16 |
| ttx | maybe we should wait for all RC1s to be out ? | 12:17 |
| dhellmann | it would make things less complicated if we did that | 12:17 |
| dhellmann | let's wait, and if they aren't all done by next week we can talk about it again | 12:17 |
| ttx | OK, let me ping you back when we are done. Hopefully tomorrow | 12:17 |
| dhellmann | oh, good | 12:17 |
| ttx | only missing trove, glance and swift at this point | 12:18 |
| ttx | how do you want to do "all the libs" ? Make sure a tag catches the latest things ? | 12:18 |
| dhellmann | yes, I think so | 12:18 |
| ttx | oslo.rootwrap is done (was done by depfreeze last week) | 12:18 |
| dhellmann | ok, good, want to go ahead and tag that as 1.0.0? | 12:19 |
| ttx | so i guess on the lib side you can already push last tags | 12:19 |
| ttx | dhellmann: it's at 1.2.0 already | 12:19 |
| dhellmann | no kidding? | 12:19 |
| ttx | started as 1.0.0 | 12:20 |
| dhellmann | ok | 12:20 |
| ttx | so yeah, push tags on libs ASAP and we'll tag/branch oslo-incubator when all RC1s are done | 12:21 |
| ttx | Anything you'd like to discuss at meeting later ? I added a pbr depfreeze exception discussion fwiw | 12:21 |
| dhellmann | ok, I'll go through the other libs today and make sure I've done them all recently | 12:21 |
| dhellmann | at some point I want to get the ptls to appoint liaisons | 12:22 |
| dhellmann | I don't think we need to wait for elections for them to bring that up and ask for volunteers | 12:22 |
| ttx | ok, feel free to add a topic to the agenda to raise awareness | 12:23 |
| dhellmann | ok | 12:23 |
| ttx | dhellmann: anything else ? | 12:23 |
| dhellmann | no, I think that's it | 12:23 |
| ttx | oslo.messaging is in the release pipe so I think it's being tagged as we speak | 12:23 |
| ttx | dhellmann: ok, thx! | 12:23 |
| dhellmann | ah, good | 12:24 |
| dhellmann | thanks! | 12:24 |
| *** markmcclain has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 12:28 | |
| ttx | markmcclain: o/ | 12:28 |
| ttx | markmcclain: open-juno merged, milestone-proposed branch cut, about to tag RC1 unless you scream | 12:28 |
| markmcclain | o/ | 12:29 |
| markmcclain | ready to cut the branch | 12:29 |
| ttx | ok, tagging now | 12:29 |
| ttx | markmcclain: would you be interested in moving back 30min earlier ? EU moved to DST now | 12:30 |
| ttx | or do you prefer this time ? | 12:30 |
| markmcclain | so back to 1200UTC? | 12:31 |
| ttx | yes | 12:31 |
| ttx | (was 1300 UTC during winter) | 12:31 |
| markmcclain | 1200 works for me | 12:32 |
| ttx | ok, cool | 12:32 |
| ttx | OK, tag pushed, tarball uploading | 12:33 |
| ttx | Looking at icehouse-rc-potential bugs now: | 12:33 |
| markmcclain | awesome glad we're finally able to release it | 12:34 |
| ttx | https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bugs?field.tag=icehouse-rc-potential | 12:34 |
| ttx | 17 bugs | 12:35 |
| markmcclain | right I was pretty generous with the tag | 12:35 |
| markmcclain | https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1290486 | 12:35 |
| ttx | hrm. need to incluse fixcommitted ones | 12:35 |
| ttx | oh, they are | 12:36 |
| markmcclain | is one that is most concerning and if valid would trigger a need for RC2 | 12:36 |
| ttx | how about we only keep the ones that may trigger a RC2 in the tag ? Then when one new RC is triggered we can look at issues fixcommitted in master and see which one we could include as well ? | 12:37 |
| markmcclain | ok so I should start tagging the others as icehouse-backport-potential then? | 12:38 |
| ttx | yes, that sounds fair | 12:38 |
| markmcclain | ok most on the list would be valid backports | 12:38 |
| markmcclain | I'll clean that up today | 12:38 |
| ttx | that way that keeps our RC-window-opening watchlist short | 12:38 |
| markmcclain | right | 12:38 |
| ttx | in all cases (1) issues need to be fixed in master first and (2) we'll let the RC1 be used at least a few days before even considering a RC2 window | 12:39 |
| ttx | don't want to discourage testing too much | 12:39 |
| ttx | but we can look at the icehouse-rc-potential list to decide when | 12:39 |
| markmcclain | right | 12:40 |
| ttx | OK, so anything you'd like to discuss at meeting later ? | 12:40 |
| markmcclain | not really a meeting item, but we'll be using the spec repo similar to nova for Juno | 12:40 |
| ttx | ok | 12:41 |
| ttx | markmcclain: talk to you later then, I'm going to send the Neutron RC1 email out | 12:41 |
| markmcclain | talk to you later thanks for the patience while we worked to everything passed through the gate | 12:42 |
| ttx | np | 12:43 |
| markmcclain | I need to add our spec repo to this file http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/governance/tree/reference/programs.yaml#n62 right? | 12:44 |
| ttx | markmcclain: yes | 12:46 |
| ttx | jd__: o/ | 12:46 |
| markmcclain | ttx: ok I'll propose that change too | 12:46 |
| ttx | jd__: around? | 12:53 |
| jd__ | ttx: yes | 13:13 |
| jd__ | ttx: what the time of our meeting officialy? :) | 13:13 |
| ttx | jd__: was 12:45 UTC | 13:13 |
| ttx | jd__: but would like to suggest 12:30 UTC starting next week | 13:13 |
| jd__ | oh I thought we switched for only two week | 13:13 |
| ttx | i.e. back at our pre-DST confusion times | 13:14 |
| jd__ | fine with me for 12:30 next week | 13:14 |
| ttx | jd__: OK... Ceilo RC1 available since yesterday, no bug on the icehouse-rc-potential list, sun is shining outside | 13:14 |
| * jd__ nods | 13:14 | |
| ttx | (fwiw the reference time lives at https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/ProjectMeeting#One-to-one_status_updates) | 13:14 |
| ttx | jd__: so I assume you detected nothing release-critical yet ? | 13:15 |
| jd__ | indeed | 13:15 |
| ttx | jd__: OK. Well, if you have anythgin serious come up, put it on the icehouse-rc-potential list (with the tag) and get it fixed in master | 13:16 |
| ttx | we'll revisit that tag content every few days to see if there is anythign serious enough to warrant respin | 13:16 |
| ttx | and in that case we may consider adding other FixCommitted things that would have made it to master in the mean time | 13:16 |
| ttx | anythign you'd like to discuss at the meeting later ? | 13:17 |
| ttx | jd__: if you are really bored you can start working on https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ReleaseNotes/Icehouse | 13:18 |
| ttx | (or get someone, multipleones to work on it) | 13:18 |
| jd__ | I wish I was bored | 13:19 |
| jd__ | I'm transfering on #openstack-ceilometer | 13:20 |
| ttx | ok, talk to you later! | 13:20 |
| ttx | jgriffith: o/ | 13:45 |
| *** markmcclain has quit IRC | 13:45 | |
| jgriffith | ttx: hi ya | 13:45 |
| ttx | jgriffith: first: do you like this time, or would you prefer one hour earlier ? I don't mind either way | 13:46 |
| jgriffith | ttx: this works well for me | 13:46 |
| ttx | OK, let's keep it then | 13:46 |
| jgriffith | sounds good | 13:46 |
| ttx | Your RC1 was out last Thursday, no icehouse-rc-potential bug on the list | 13:46 |
| ttx | anything I should be aware of ? | 13:47 |
| jgriffith | I have one that I'm going to add | 13:47 |
| jgriffith | maybe another | 13:47 |
| jgriffith | just a sec | 13:47 |
| jgriffith | looking for the tag | 13:47 |
| jgriffith | https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bugs?field.tag=icehouse-backport-potential | 13:47 |
| jgriffith | the Windows one's I didn't tag and actually stated too bad too sad | 13:48 |
| jgriffith | same with ibm | 13:48 |
| jgriffith | although I don't really care (they don't impact anything) it's the principal | 13:48 |
| ttx | they all sounds valid, maybe we should move them to icehouse-rc-potential | 13:48 |
| jgriffith | I will do that right now | 13:49 |
| jgriffith | ttx: you're a nicer person than I am | 13:49 |
| ttx | let them pile up for a few more days and we'll open an RC2 window to collect them | 13:49 |
| jgriffith | works for me | 13:49 |
| ttx | they will need to be fixed in master to be considered though :) | 13:50 |
| jgriffith | understood, they're all in progress | 13:51 |
| ttx | anything you'd like to add to meeting agenda ? | 13:51 |
| ttx | (one of them is fixcommitted) | 13:51 |
| jgriffith | nah | 13:51 |
| ttx | https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1299131 ? | 13:51 |
| jgriffith | is this the right way to add this now: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1300496 | 13:51 |
| ttx | nope. just tag them icehouse-rc-potential | 13:52 |
| ttx | i'll fix it | 13:52 |
| ttx | like this: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1300496 | 13:52 |
| jgriffith | Oh! | 13:52 |
| jgriffith | I already had them tagged | 13:53 |
| ttx | yes, but with non-RC tag :) | 13:53 |
| jgriffith | Ok, I'll change it | 13:53 |
| jgriffith | thanks | 13:53 |
| ttx | backport-potential is "looks like somethig we could backport after release" | 13:53 |
| jgriffith | I get ya | 13:53 |
| ttx | rc-potential is "looks like something we should respin RCs over" | 13:53 |
| ttx | jgriffith: ok, talk to you later then | 13:54 |
| jgriffith | ttx: thanks! | 13:54 |
| ttx | dolphm: ready when you are | 13:56 |
| dolphm | ttx: o/ | 13:59 |
| ttx | dolphm: o/ | 13:59 |
| ttx | dolphm: your RC1 is up since last Thursday | 13:59 |
| ttx | 2 bugs @ https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bugs?field.tag=icehouse-rc-potential | 14:00 |
| ttx | looking them up | 14:00 |
| dolphm | i'm also working on a "backport" for https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1299349 | 14:00 |
| ttx | 1226171 hardly souns like something new | 14:01 |
| ttx | been around all cycle | 14:01 |
| dolphm | ++ | 14:01 |
| ttx | any reason it would suddenly be urgent ? | 14:01 |
| dolphm | i was planning on asking russellb today | 14:01 |
| ttx | the other one looks pretty shallow to me | 14:02 |
| ttx | I'll remove the tag and we'll see if it surfaces again | 14:02 |
| dolphm | admittedly related to the CVE, so it was worth investigating, but i don't see much there unless anyone can confirm it | 14:03 |
| russellb | hm? | 14:03 |
| dolphm | russellb: you added icehouse-rc-potential to a fairly longstanding issue that we weren't planning on addressing until juno https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/1226171 | 14:03 |
| ttx | russellb: we are looking at https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/1226171 which you tagged icehouse-rc-potential for keystone | 14:03 |
| russellb | dolphm: morgan brought that up, was asking if it should go in rc2 | 14:04 |
| russellb | i said no, but that we could put it on our "nice to have list if we happened to do an rc2, but we won't block on it" list | 14:04 |
| dolphm | russellb: oh the nova patch? | 14:04 |
| russellb | i think i thought it was a nova bug though | 14:05 |
| russellb | yeah. | 14:05 |
| russellb | so, sorry | 14:05 |
| dolphm | russellb: i'll add nova to the bug report then - that makes more sense | 14:05 |
| russellb | actually this isn't the right bug at all | 14:05 |
| ttx | hah | 14:05 |
| russellb | maybe morgan linked me to the wrong bug | 14:05 |
| ttx | let's remove rc-potential from this one then | 14:05 |
| russellb | k | 14:05 |
| dolphm | russellb: morganfainberg_Z has a patch against that bug in nova, but the bug isn't tracked against nova | 14:06 |
| * ttx is confiuse | 14:06 | |
| ttx | d | 14:06 |
| russellb | dolphm: yeah i guess it is that bug, just not so obvious, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/77450/ | 14:06 |
| russellb | the nova patch is just about fixing the possible max length of a user id | 14:07 |
| russellb | and the bug doesn't really say anything about that problem in nova | 14:07 |
| russellb | really needs a new bug against nova IMO | 14:07 |
| ttx | russellb: to add it to the "might add it to RC2 if we do one", I'd rather just make the bug fixed in master. IF we do a RC2 we'll look at all FixCommitted bugs to see if they would make sense being added to the RC2 mix | 14:07 |
| dolphm | russellb: i think the relationship to nova and other services was discussed on the -dev list | 14:08 |
| ttx | and keep only potential RC2-triggers on the icehouse-rc-potential list | 14:08 |
| dolphm | russellb: but i agree, would be much more clear if tracked separately | 14:08 |
| russellb | ttx: ah, ok ... then nova's list is way too big then | 14:08 |
| russellb | but for nova, it's helpful to separate out the "keep on radar" from the massive full list | 14:08 |
| ttx | russellb: I guess you could abuse icehouse-backport-potential for that | 14:09 |
| russellb | true | 14:09 |
| ttx | since I suspect those would all make good backports | 14:09 |
| ttx | russellb: I can clean it up | 14:09 |
| russellb | yay | 14:09 |
| ttx | when your turn comes | 14:09 |
| russellb | 5 minutes! | 14:10 |
| russellb | or maybe later, as i've been stealing dolphm's time | 14:10 |
| ttx | dolphm: so your list is now empty, great | 14:10 |
| dolphm | ttx: do i need to add icehouse-rc-potential to https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1299349 ? | 14:10 |
| ttx | dolphm: feel free to get a head start on https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ReleaseNotes/Icehouse | 14:10 |
| dolphm | ttx: headstarted already | 14:11 |
| dolphm | ttx: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ReleaseNotes/Icehouse#OpenStack_Identity_.28Keystone.29 | 14:11 |
| ttx | 1299349, hmm | 14:12 |
| ttx | dolphm: probably yes | 14:12 |
| ttx | that might expedite a fix in time for the next translations update | 14:13 |
| ttx | dolphm: anything you want to add to meeting agenda ? | 14:13 |
| ttx | dolphm: did you prepare an etherpad for the requirements gap analysis at the TC ? | 14:13 |
| dolphm | ttx: not for the cross-project meeting | 14:14 |
| * ttx add icehouse-rc-potential to https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1299349 | 14:14 | |
| dolphm | ttx: i have not prepared (at all) for the gap analysis, but that is the next thing on my to do list for the next couple hours | 14:14 |
| ttx | dolphm: just copy http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/governance/tree/reference/incubation-integration-requirements to a new etherpad | 14:15 |
| ttx | and then you can add comments to it, we'll run through the etherpad during the meeting | 14:15 |
| dolphm | ttx: sounds good | 14:15 |
| ttx | dolphm: ok, talk to you later | 14:15 |
| ttx | russellb: you're up! | 14:15 |
| russellb | o/ | 14:16 |
| ttx | RC1 issued yesterday | 14:16 |
| russellb | yes! | 14:16 |
| dolphm | ttx: /salute | 14:16 |
| ttx | 49 bugs on https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=icehouse-rc-potential | 14:16 |
| ttx | definitely too much for my use of it :) | 14:16 |
| russellb | let's move that to icehouse-backport-potential | 14:16 |
| russellb | and i'll start using rc-potential for possible rc triggers | 14:16 |
| russellb | there's a neutron regression that came up last night | 14:16 |
| russellb | is the only one i know of right now | 14:17 |
| russellb | https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1300325 | 14:17 |
| russellb | that one should stay rc-potential | 14:17 |
| ttx | I'd also keep 1299349 on it | 14:17 |
| russellb | OK | 14:17 |
| ttx | but then rc-potential is cross-project so might trigger corner cases | 14:17 |
| ttx | OK, will move everything else post-1:1 meeting | 14:18 |
| russellb | maybe https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1295381 | 14:18 |
| russellb | that was on the rc1 list before | 14:18 |
| russellb | got bumped because of their broken CI | 14:18 |
| ttx | ok | 14:20 |
| ttx | I guess i'll use the remaining 10 minutes of your time to retag | 14:21 |
| ttx | anything you'd like to add to meeting agenda ? | 14:21 |
| *** markmcclain has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 14:21 | |
| russellb | ttx: not for today | 14:23 |
| russellb | ttx: working on release notes | 14:23 |
| russellb | only a few more of these for me! *sheds a tear* | 14:24 |
| *** david-lyle has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 14:35 | |
| ttx | david-lyle: o/ | 14:35 |
| david-lyle | o/ | 14:35 |
| ttx | so you got your RC1 out yesterday | 14:36 |
| david-lyle | yes \o/ | 14:36 |
| ttx | https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bugs?field.tag=icehouse-rc-potential | 14:36 |
| ttx | has 3 bugs | 14:36 |
| david-lyle | one more should be tagged | 14:37 |
| ttx | so is there anything in there that would actually be critical enough to trigger a RC2 ? | 14:37 |
| david-lyle | yes, translations aren't in yet | 14:37 |
| ttx | hmm | 14:37 |
| ttx | weird | 14:38 |
| david-lyle | we didn't have a bug tracking them, unfortunately | 14:38 |
| ttx | I checked and made sure the last import was relatively recent | 14:38 |
| ttx | oh, you do manual ones ? | 14:38 |
| david-lyle | yes, the automated mechanism hasn't worked for us yet | 14:39 |
| david-lyle | work in progress | 14:39 |
| ttx | that explains it | 14:39 |
| ttx | so yeah, definitely somethig we'd respin over | 14:39 |
| david-lyle | yes | 14:39 |
| ttx | let's let the bugs pile up for a few days, don't want to throw away RC1 too fast | 14:39 |
| ttx | but we should open a RC2 window officially, say, on Thursday | 14:40 |
| ttx | so let's get all those fixes in master ASAP | 14:40 |
| david-lyle | sure, I think amotoki indicated a Monday target for the translations | 14:40 |
| david-lyle | so for an RC2, we just want release critical fixes, correct? | 14:43 |
| ttx | to justify the respin, yes | 14:43 |
| ttx | david-lyle: that said, once we decide we respin we can also add "obviously safe" fixes | 14:43 |
| david-lyle | ok, just wanted to understand the parameters | 14:44 |
| ttx | so we just look at whatever was fixcommitted in master since then and consider it for inclusion | 14:44 |
| ttx | Basically 1298991 sounds like something that shouldn't be on the rc-potential list, but could get picked up | 14:44 |
| ttx | IF we do a RC2 window | 14:45 |
| ttx | if that makes sense | 14:45 |
| david-lyle | yes | 14:45 |
| ttx | looking at 1287192 | 14:45 |
| ttx | a bit big for my usual taste | 14:46 |
| david-lyle | most of that is test though | 14:46 |
| ttx | oh | 14:47 |
| david-lyle | I'll take a deeper look today | 14:47 |
| ttx | ok, sounds relatively safe, let's keep it in list | 14:47 |
| david-lyle | looks like the patch still has a few things to work through yet | 14:47 |
| ttx | right, in all cases it needs to land and break master first :P | 14:48 |
| david-lyle | :D | 14:48 |
| ttx | anything to add to meeting agenda for later today ? | 14:48 |
| david-lyle | no | 14:48 |
| ttx | ok then, talk to you later | 14:48 |
| david-lyle | see you then | 14:48 |
| *** markwash has quit IRC | 15:25 | |
| *** markwash has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 15:26 | |
| ttx | notmyname: ready when you are | 15:28 |
| notmyname | ttx: here | 15:29 |
| ttx | notmyname: hi! How is your RC1 coming up ? | 15:29 |
| ttx | i see on https://launchpad.net/swift/+milestone/next-icehouse that there seems to be a number of TODOs still | 15:30 |
| notmyname | ttx: good, but I've got a couple more things that need to land first | 15:30 |
| notmyname | ttx: https://bugs.launchpad.net/swift/+bug/1296941 is the biggest one | 15:30 |
| ttx | ok | 15:30 |
| ttx | notmyname: do you think Thursday is a likely ETA ? | 15:31 |
| notmyname | there's a few more nice-to-haves, but the range requests on manifests is the biggest outstanding one | 15:31 |
| notmyname | sure, why not? ;-) | 15:31 |
| notmyname | I hope so :-) | 15:31 |
| * ttx is trying to see when we can unfreeze deps by creating a milestone-proposed branch for requirements | 15:31 | |
| ttx | we need all projects to have a MP branch before we can do that | 15:32 |
| notmyname | ok | 15:32 |
| ttx | otherwise you might get caught in weird bumps that will happen on master | 15:32 |
| notmyname | I'm not planning on adding any new dependencies, especially any that aren't in global requirements already | 15:32 |
| notmyname | the only thing we've done recently is add six to swiftclient | 15:32 |
| ttx | I think damage if yo ustill tracked the master branch would be limited, but if we can avoid it... | 15:33 |
| notmyname | there's nothing pending in swift that will add any dependencies | 15:33 |
| notmyname | right, I understand | 15:33 |
| ttx | if we are just missing a few commits we might just cut the MP branch and wait a bit before tagging, backporting the last commits there | 15:33 |
| notmyname | I'm still not a fan of the manifestation of the global requirements idea, but that's a conversation for the summit :-) | 15:34 |
| notmyname | let's regroup on thursday and see where we are | 15:34 |
| ttx | OK, let's see how close we are on Thursday, and we'll see what to do then | 15:34 |
| ttx | heh | 15:34 |
| notmyname | ttx: anything else? | 15:35 |
| ttx | Nope, I don't think I have a lot to add. Anything you'd liek to add to meeting agenda for today ? | 15:36 |
| notmyname | no. I'm not sure of my availability then. I'll be there if at all possible | 15:36 |
| ttx | Oh, did you settle on a version number ? | 15:36 |
| ttx | that I can convert next-icehouse to ? | 15:36 |
| notmyname | 1.13.1 | 15:37 |
| ttx | OK, I'll rename next-icehouse to 1.13.1-rc1 | 15:37 |
| ttx | link coming up | 15:37 |
| ttx | https://launchpad.net/swift/+milestone/1.13.1-rc1 | 15:38 |
| ttx | notmyname: ok, that's all I had. talk to you later, maybe | 15:38 |
| notmyname | ack | 15:38 |
| ttx | markwash: ready when you are | 15:39 |
| markwash | ttx here | 15:43 |
| ttx | https://launchpad.net/glance/+milestone/icehouse-rc1 | 15:43 |
| markwash | lets try out this old song and dance again | 15:43 |
| markwash | :-) | 15:43 |
| ttx | https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1279000 | 15:43 |
| ttx | I see https://review.openstack.org/#/c/75865/ | 15:43 |
| markwash | so we did a little rework on that yesterday | 15:43 |
| ttx | but I suspect there is more to it now ? | 15:44 |
| ttx | I'm all ears | 15:44 |
| markwash | no, that's it actually | 15:44 |
| markwash | we settled on punting the utf8 fix migration stuff | 15:44 |
| ttx | so it just needs another +2 ? | 15:44 |
| markwash | yes | 15:44 |
| ttx | sounds doable | 15:44 |
| markwash | in fact | 15:44 |
| markwash | just called out for core on that one | 15:45 |
| ttx | russellb: what's the most convenient way to add the dependency on the final patch on open-juno change ? rebase ? | 15:45 |
| ttx | markwash: we could queue up the approval for the open-juno change then | 15:46 |
| markwash | sounds good, and I think rebasing on that checkout is exactly what we want to do in that case | 15:46 |
| russellb | yeah | 15:46 |
| ttx | markwash: feeling comfortable doing it, or should I ? | 15:46 |
| markwash | sure I'll do it | 15:47 |
| ttx | then I might be able to tag before the meetings | 15:47 |
| ttx | if the first one gets it's second +2 asap | 15:47 |
| markwash | indeed | 15:48 |
| markwash | let's make that the goal | 15:48 |
| markwash | spice today up a bit | 15:48 |
| ttx | OK, looks like we are in good shape | 15:51 |
| ttx | how did you end up solving that DB UTF8 thing ? Looks like the fix might come in handy for keystone | 15:51 |
| markwash | ttx: well we really just figured out that we aren't at any risk yet of fkey problems | 15:52 |
| markwash | becuase none of our migrations actually set the charset yet | 15:53 |
| markwash | and I think we'll try to upstream an out-of-band migration tool to do the conversions | 15:53 |
| ttx | ok | 15:54 |
| ttx | markwash: anything to add to todays meeting agenda ? | 15:54 |
| markwash | not a peep | 15:54 |
| *** hub_cap has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 15:55 | |
| markwash | oh hey hub_cap | 15:55 |
| hub_cap | hey hey markwash | 15:55 |
| hub_cap | hows the weather :) | 15:55 |
| * hub_cap whispers i know the answer | 15:56 | |
| * markwash lols | 15:56 | |
| ttx | hub_cap: o/ | 15:56 |
| hub_cap | heyo ttx | 15:56 |
| hub_cap | so we found a late critical bug | 15:56 |
| ttx | so looks like you just need to approve the open-juno thing now | 15:56 |
| ttx | hah! | 15:56 |
| hub_cap | densis/slick are finishing it | 15:56 |
| hub_cap | yea im glad we found it | 15:56 |
| * ttx looks | 15:56 | |
| hub_cap | we cant add secgrps | 15:56 |
| hub_cap | lol | 15:56 |
| ttx | "trove secgroup-add-rule returns 500" | 15:57 |
| hub_cap | yar | 15:57 |
| ttx | hub_cap: just push the open-juno one if you manage to get it fixed today | 15:57 |
| ttx | will pick it up tomorrow | 15:58 |
| hub_cap | it will be fixed today | 15:58 |
| hub_cap | ive laready been assured :) | 15:58 |
| hub_cap | and then yes we will merge the juno one | 15:58 |
| hub_cap | does that mean u get to vote for trove ptl ;) | 15:58 |
| ttx | damn, my evil plan is now exposed | 15:58 |
| hub_cap | dont vote for me :) | 15:58 |
| hub_cap | hahahhaah ttx | 15:58 |
| hub_cap | all of that work you do, so u can vote for each ptl | 15:58 |
| hub_cap | LOL | 15:59 |
| * ttx looks up if he pushed anything yet | 15:59 | |
| ttx | stackalytics says no | 15:59 |
| ttx | you could arguably push a cleanroom implementation of my novel patch | 15:59 |
| ttx | if you prefer :) | 15:59 |
| hub_cap | stakalytics the source of all truth :) | 16:00 |
| ttx | it's like the new google | 16:00 |
| hub_cap | ttx no room of mine is clean, ill leav yers | 16:00 |
| hub_cap | *leave | 16:00 |
| hub_cap | and lol it is | 16:00 |
| ttx | OK well, if the last blocker is fixed today I don't have much to add | 16:00 |
| ttx | anything you want to see discussed at meeting later ? | 16:01 |
| hub_cap | nosah | 16:01 |
| ttx | oh, and don't forget to fill in the release notes before April 17. | 16:01 |
| ttx | https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ReleaseNotes/Icehouse | 16:01 |
| ttx | hub_cap: ok then, talk to you later ! | 16:01 |
| hub_cap | cu ttx | 16:02 |
| *** david-lyle is now known as david-lyle_afk | 17:17 | |
| *** morganfainberg_Z is now known as morganfainberg | 17:31 | |
| dolphm | ttx: i have not maintained this list at all, do i need to trim it immediately? https://launchpad.net/~keystone-coresec/+members#active | 17:45 |
| ttx | dolphm: yes, ideally | 18:21 |
| ttx | but it can be a small identified gap | 18:21 |
| *** hub_cap has left #openstack-relmgr-office | 18:22 | |
| *** markmcclain has quit IRC | 19:08 | |
| ttx | stevebaker: I think I missed our meeting. You around now ? | 19:36 |
| stevebaker | I am | 19:36 |
| ttx | stevebaker: how about we move to 19:30 UTC starting next week ? That way it's close to the next meeting | 19:37 |
| stevebaker | we're about to have daylight savings, its too early for my brain to do the time math | 19:38 |
| ttx | hah | 19:38 |
| ttx | well time will tell. | 19:38 |
| ttx | stevebaker: so your RC1 is just fresh off the presses | 19:38 |
| stevebaker | April 6 daylight savings ends | 19:38 |
| ttx | You have 5 bugs up on https://bugs.launchpad.net/heat/+bugs?field.tag=icehouse-rc-potential | 19:38 |
| ttx | anything significant enough to "trigger" a RC2 in there ? | 19:39 |
| stevebaker | I haven't done a pass through yet, so that list will grow. I'm certain we'll find something to justify an rc2 | 19:40 |
| ttx | stevebaker: OK. We'll let the RC1 see some mileage before we open a RC2 window. Let's say we rediscuss that on Thursday and maybe open the RC2 window then ? | 19:40 |
| stevebaker | ok | 19:40 |
| ttx | anything you'd like to add to meetgni agenda ? | 19:40 |
| stevebaker | no, I think I'm good | 19:40 |
| ttx | stevebaker: ok then, talk to you later! | 19:41 |
| stevebaker | ok, later | 19:41 |
| stevebaker | ttx: I can do 0730 UTC from next week | 19:42 |
| ttx | hmm, tempting | 19:42 |
| stevebaker | hang on, that is the same time as now | 19:42 |
| ttx | hmm, no. Now is 19:30 UTC :) | 19:43 |
| ttx | wel.. 19:43 | 19:43 |
| stevebaker | oh, I meant 19:30 | 19:43 |
| stevebaker | I can do 1930, which appears to be what we already do | 19:43 |
| ttx | OK. 19:30 UTC is fine for next week | 19:43 |
| stevebaker | or 2030 | 19:44 |
| ttx | I'm in meetings starting at 20:00 UTC so 19:30 is fine | 19:44 |
| ttx | Updated on https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/ProjectMeeting#One-to-one_status_updates | 19:44 |
| ttx | stevebaker: thx! | 19:44 |
| *** markmcclain has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 20:03 | |
| *** david-lyle_afk is now known as david-lyle | 21:01 | |
| stevebaker | ttx: It looks like there are some Fix Committed bugs that didn't get Fix Released by rc1 | 21:56 |
| stevebaker | https://bugs.launchpad.net/heat/+bugs?field.searchtext=&orderby=-importance&field.status%3Alist=FIXCOMMITTED&assignee_option=any&field.assignee=&field.bug_reporter=&field.bug_commenter=&field.subscriber=&field.structural_subscriber=&field.tag=&field.tags_combinator=ANY&field.has_cve.used=&field.omit_dupes.used=&field.omit_dupes=on&field.affects_me.used=&field.has_patch.used=&field.has_branche | 21:56 |
| stevebaker | s.used=&field.has_branches=on&field.has_no_branches.used=&field.has_no_branches=on&field.has_blueprints.used=&field.has_blueprints=on&field.has_no_blueprints.used=&field.has_no_blueprints=on&search=Search | 21:56 |
| *** markmcclain has quit IRC | 22:52 | |
| *** david-lyle has quit IRC | 23:20 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!