| *** openstack has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 00:19 | |
| -dickson.freenode.net- [freenode-info] channel flooding and no channel staff around to help? Please check with freenode support: http://freenode.net/faq.shtml#gettinghelp | 00:19 | |
| *** david-lyle has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 03:17 | |
| *** johnthetubaguy has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 09:21 | |
| *** morganfainberg is now known as morganfainberg_Z | 10:05 | |
| *** markmcclain has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 10:39 | |
| dhellmann | hi, ttx | 12:17 |
|---|---|---|
| * dhellmann realizes he's early | 12:21 | |
| *** david-lyle has quit IRC | 12:23 | |
| *** markmcclain has quit IRC | 12:24 | |
| *** markmcclain has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 12:24 | |
| *** markmcclain1 has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 12:25 | |
| *** markmcclain2 has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 12:27 | |
| *** markmcclain2 has quit IRC | 12:27 | |
| *** markmcclain2 has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 12:28 | |
| *** markmcclain has quit IRC | 12:29 | |
| *** markmcclain1 has quit IRC | 12:29 | |
| *** markmcclain2 has quit IRC | 12:30 | |
| *** markmcclain has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 12:31 | |
| ttx | dhellmann: oops | 12:31 |
| ttx | this new time is killing my lunch | 12:31 |
| dhellmann | ttx: sorry :-/ | 12:32 |
| ttx | dhellmann: let's do this quick https://launchpad.net/oslo/+milestone/icehouse-rc1 | 12:32 |
| dhellmann | tuesday is a commute day for me, so if I wait another hour to leave the house it throws off the whole day | 12:32 |
| ttx | so one bug left in there | 12:32 |
| dhellmann | yeah, bnemec had some questions about the approach -- I'm going to follow up today | 12:32 |
| ttx | dhellmann: where would the fix land exactly ? | 12:33 |
| dhellmann | one fix in oslo and 2 in glance | 12:33 |
| dhellmann | we provide an option, they change their tool to use it, then they write a migration | 12:33 |
| ttx | fix in oslo -> in oslo-incubator ? | 12:33 |
| dhellmann | yes | 12:33 |
| ttx | so it needs a sync afterwards ? | 12:34 |
| ttx | (just glance ?) | 12:34 |
| dhellmann | yes | 12:34 |
| ttx | OK, would be good to nail that one before it delays glance rc1 | 12:34 |
| dhellmann | the default for the option will be the current behavior, but we have to be able to turn that off for the glance migrations to run *up to* the one that fixes the encoding | 12:34 |
| dhellmann | ack | 12:34 |
| ttx | Nothing left in https://launchpad.net/oslo.messaging/+milestone/icehouse-rc1 | 12:35 |
| ttx | any other library update expected pre-release ? | 12:35 |
| ttx | I did oslo.rootwrap 1.2.0 yesterday | 12:35 |
| dhellmann | we have one change going into cliff and then I'm going to tag a release this week | 12:35 |
| dhellmann | otherwise I think we're settled | 12:36 |
| ttx | ok cool | 12:36 |
| dhellmann | it might even be good to cut our stable branch early so we can start working on libraries, but we can talk about that next week | 12:36 |
| ttx | dhellmann: any topic for todays meeting ? | 12:36 |
| dhellmann | no | 12:36 |
| ttx | markmcclain: around? | 12:36 |
| ttx | dhellmann: ok, thx, see you there | 12:36 |
| dhellmann | ttx: thanks | 12:37 |
| markmcclain | ttx: hi | 12:37 |
| ttx | https://launchpad.net/neutron/+milestone/icehouse-rc1 | 12:38 |
| ttx | 19 bugs left | 12:38 |
| markmcclain | yeah much higher than I'd like | 12:38 |
| markmcclain | most of the remaining bugs should have code associated | 12:39 |
| ttx | markmcclain: maybe make another pass to only select MUST HAVEs ? | 12:39 |
| ttx | There are a few Low impact bugs in there that will probably make it before we cut RC1 anyway | 12:39 |
| markmcclain | I've been going through each day and removing the target on non-must haves | 12:39 |
| ttx | ok | 12:39 |
| markmcclain | yeah for the low/med I haven't removed because most have 1 +2 | 12:40 |
| ttx | The top 5 on the list are not marked "in progress", is a patch near for those ? | 12:40 |
| markmcclain | so https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1230407 has been covered by other work | 12:41 |
| markmcclain | I'm probably going to close it as too broad | 12:41 |
| ttx | ok good | 12:41 |
| markmcclain | same with https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1265495 | 12:41 |
| markmcclain | I've been investigating this one: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1291992 | 12:42 |
| ttx | Looks more like a gate blocker rather than a RC1 bug | 12:43 |
| ttx | unless it has real world effects too | 12:43 |
| markmcclain | that's my impression | 12:43 |
| markmcclain | the incidence rate the gate is not terrible | 12:43 |
| markmcclain | there are two that I'd consider blockers: | 12:43 |
| markmcclain | https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1112912 | 12:43 |
| ttx | Still high prio to fix, just not a RC1 blocker (can easily be fixed after) | 12:43 |
| markmcclain | and possibly: | 12:43 |
| markmcclain | https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1276391 | 12:43 |
| markmcclain | '391 I'm having a hard time getting good info from the assignee | 12:44 |
| markmcclain | a patch has been promised 'tomorrow' for some time now | 12:45 |
| ttx | ok | 12:45 |
| ttx | All in all, it will take a few days to burn through that list | 12:45 |
| ttx | I think we should target early next week for a Neutron RC1 | 12:45 |
| markmcclain | yeah later than I'd like, but seem unavoidable right now | 12:45 |
| ttx | Does that sound achievable ? | 12:45 |
| ttx | OK... Topics for meeting later today ? | 12:46 |
| markmcclain | nothing from my end… I've got conflict and might not make either meeting | 12:46 |
| ttx | (unrelated) did you prepare a gap coverage plan to expose at the TC meeting ? | 12:46 |
| ttx | oh, ok | 12:46 |
| ttx | well, talk to you later, maybe | 12:47 |
| markmcclain | on the gap coverage I've been working on the plan | 12:47 |
| markmcclain | but want to get a more firm commitment on a few resources before committing to a timeline | 12:47 |
| markmcclain | I'm afraid that not having a firm commitment might produce an realistic plan | 12:48 |
| markmcclain | s/realstic/unrealistic/ | 12:48 |
| ttx | ok | 12:49 |
| ttx | jd__: around? | 12:49 |
| jd__ | ttx: oui | 12:51 |
| ttx | https://launchpad.net/ceilometer/+milestone/icehouse-rc1 | 12:51 |
| ttx | 7 bugs left | 12:52 |
| ttx | two of them are unassigned ? | 12:52 |
| jd__ | not so bad | 12:52 |
| jd__ | yep, I can probablt find a volunteer | 12:52 |
| ttx | yes, please assign volunteers to both | 12:53 |
| ttx | The goal is to cut RC1 before the end of the week | 12:53 |
| ttx | so we need to burn those down quick | 12:53 |
| ttx | (or consider them non-release-critical) | 12:53 |
| ttx | do you think RC1 this week is a realistic goal ? | 12:54 |
| ttx | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+bug/1244182 sounds featureful to me at this point | 12:56 |
| ttx | jd__: should we remove it from list ? | 12:57 |
| jd__ | it could be realistic | 12:57 |
| jd__ | we can try at least, that would be a good goal | 12:57 |
| jd__ | ttx: agreed on #1244182, removed | 12:58 |
| ttx | yay one down | 12:58 |
| ttx | jd__: just concerned that the curve for ceilometer isn't exactly going down at http://old-wiki.openstack.org/rc/ | 12:59 |
| ttx | so you probably don't burn through the list fast enough to hit RC1 anytime soon | 12:59 |
| ttx | anything we can do to help ? | 12:59 |
| jd__ | we just lack manpower I guess | 12:59 |
| jd__ | I don't think we are blocked by anything otherwise | 13:00 |
| ttx | ok, some probably time to ring the town hall bell | 13:00 |
| ttx | and get those last bugfixes in asap | 13:00 |
| jd__ | I'll do that again in the meeting :) | 13:00 |
| ttx | jd__: anything you want to discuss at release meeting ? | 13:00 |
| jd__ | ttx: all good | 13:00 |
| ttx | ok ttyl | 13:01 |
| *** ChanServ changes topic to "the gerrit event stream is currently hung, blocking all testing. troubleshooting is in progress (next update at 14:00 utc)" | 13:21 | |
| *** ChanServ changes topic to "OpenStack Release Managers office - Where weekly 1:1 sync points between release manager and PTLs happen - Logged at http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-relmgr-office/" | 13:30 | |
| *** markmcclain has quit IRC | 13:34 | |
| dolphm | ttx: o/ | 14:06 |
| ttx | dolphm: o/ | 14:06 |
| ttx | https://launchpad.net/keystone/+milestone/icehouse-rc1 | 14:06 |
| ttx | you're all set ? | 14:07 |
| dolphm | ttx: we *just* closed the last RC-blocker... | 14:07 |
| dolphm | ttx: i assume we have time to wait a bit before cutting an RC? | 14:07 |
| dolphm | ~24 hours? | 14:07 |
| ttx | OK, so here is what I propose: you go through the list of bugs to make sure there is no release-critical one that flies below the radar | 14:07 |
| ttx | and if the list is still at 0 tomorrow I cut RC1 there | 14:08 |
| dolphm | ttx: sounds good | 14:08 |
| ttx | You seem to be in good shape, I don't have any question | 14:09 |
| ttx | keyanything you'd like to discuss at meeting later ? | 14:09 |
| ttx | s/key// | 14:09 |
| dolphm | not from me | 14:09 |
| ttx | dolphm: we'll need a keystoneclient version cut soon for what-you-know | 14:09 |
| ttx | ideally on Thursday | 14:10 |
| dolphm | ttx: i was about to message you about that; we'll be going through our outstanding reviews in the client today | 14:10 |
| ttx | so that we can properly advertise what it fixes | 14:10 |
| dolphm | ttx: i'm hoping to cut a client tomorrow sometime | 14:10 |
| ttx | dolphm: ok, let's discuss that one offline | 14:10 |
| ttx | dolphm: ok thx! | 14:11 |
| ttx | jgriffith: missed our appointment, you around ? | 14:11 |
| dolphm | ttx: /salute | 14:12 |
| * ttx was busy trying to fit 120 blocks into 105 slors | 14:12 | |
| ttx | slots* | 14:12 |
| jgriffith | ttx: I'mhere | 14:16 |
| ttx | jgriffith: ok | 14:17 |
| jgriffith | ttx: how did that work out for ya? | 14:17 |
| jgriffith | :) | 14:17 |
| jgriffith | the 120 block in 105 slots | 14:17 |
| ttx | first one to make fun of me ends up with 15 less lots at summit | 14:17 |
| ttx | slots* | 14:17 |
| jgriffith | ttx: wasn't me | 14:17 |
| jgriffith | I said nothing | 14:17 |
| ttx | https://launchpad.net/cinder/+milestone/icehouse-rc1 | 14:17 |
| ttx | ok, 2 bugs left | 14:17 |
| jgriffith | 881 is in review | 14:18 |
| jgriffith | the ssl one I may punt on | 14:18 |
| ttx | what wbout bug 1295906 | 14:18 |
| ttx | https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1295906 | 14:18 |
| jgriffith | Nope | 14:18 |
| jgriffith | I'm done with drivers | 14:18 |
| jgriffith | they're not blocking anything for me at this point | 14:18 |
| jgriffith | unless it's the ref driver | 14:18 |
| jgriffith | if it lands it lands | 14:19 |
| ttx | ok | 14:19 |
| jgriffith | but I'm not targetting it | 14:19 |
| jgriffith | or the 10 Vmware bugs | 14:19 |
| * jgriffith is very unpopular this week :) | 14:19 | |
| ttx | OK, looks like we could tag ~ Thursday | 14:19 |
| jgriffith | That's what I'm thinking, yes | 14:19 |
| ttx | works for me as an ETA | 14:19 |
| jgriffith | k... let's plan on it | 14:20 |
| jgriffith | Thursday morning? | 14:20 |
| jgriffith | my morning? | 14:20 |
| ttx | your morning yes | 14:20 |
| jgriffith | sounds like a plan | 14:20 |
| ttx | anything you'd like to discuss at meeting later today ? | 14:20 |
| jgriffith | not really.... | 14:20 |
| jgriffith | amd I still up for the TC meeting stuff? | 14:20 |
| * jgriffith hasn't checked agenda | 14:21 | |
| ttx | yes, more than ever | 14:21 |
| ttx | since markmcclain may miss it | 14:21 |
| jgriffith | ha | 14:21 |
| jgriffith | ok | 14:21 |
| jgriffith | I'll get ready for that then | 14:21 |
| ttx | cool, thx | 14:21 |
| ttx | russellb: around? | 14:21 |
| russellb | ttx: o/ | 14:21 |
| russellb | johnthetubaguy: dansmith ping, if you'd like to join | 14:22 |
| ttx | russellb: got your crew of groupies with you ? | 14:22 |
| * russellb summoning | 14:22 | |
| dansmith | cha | 14:22 |
| johnthetubaguy | russellb: howdy | 14:22 |
| ttx | you're a true rockstar | 14:22 |
| russellb | \o/ | 14:22 |
| dansmith | groupies? | 14:22 |
| * dansmith chants russellb, russellb, russellb! | 14:22 | |
| ttx | https://launchpad.net/nova/+milestone/icehouse-rc1 | 14:22 |
| ttx | 6 bugs left | 14:23 |
| russellb | seems doable for this week | 14:23 |
| johnthetubaguy | do we actually need all of them? | 14:23 |
| ttx | russellb: one of them is a security issue that may miss the target, but I'll remove it from blockers list | 14:24 |
| russellb | been trying to figure out if we can drop any ... | 14:24 |
| russellb | ttx: OK. i figure most people can't see that one ;-) | 14:24 |
| dansmith | are all the vmware ones regressions? | 14:24 |
| russellb | just had it on the radar | 14:24 |
| russellb | dansmith: they say they are, yes | 14:24 |
| dansmith | okay | 14:24 |
| russellb | well, one is already approved i think | 14:24 |
| russellb | one is a regression | 14:24 |
| russellb | the other isn't a regression, but has a CVE | 14:24 |
| russellb | so i figure we should include it | 14:25 |
| dansmith | yeah | 14:25 |
| johnthetubaguy | yeah, that seems fair | 14:25 |
| russellb | shawns is approved, resize thing is regression | 14:25 |
| russellb | rescue is the CVE | 14:25 |
| russellb | the critical one has a revert up for review, i think it's blocked by a tempest patch being merged first | 14:25 |
| russellb | but should be easy enough to get in | 14:25 |
| ttx | OK, down to 5 | 14:25 |
| russellb | and then the nasty libvirt one | 14:25 |
| ttx | russellb: how about targeting end of week for the tag ? | 14:26 |
| russellb | ttx: sounds reasonable to me. dansmith johnthetubaguy thoughts? | 14:26 |
| dansmith | yep | 14:26 |
| johnthetubaguy | +1 | 14:26 |
| russellb | cool | 14:26 |
| russellb | just gotta push these things through ... | 14:27 |
| russellb | dansmith: you guys were just talking about the resize one? | 14:27 |
| dansmith | russellb: no, related stuff, not the fix itself | 14:27 |
| russellb | ah, k | 14:27 |
| ttx | OK, sounds all reasonable. Anything you'd like to discuss at meeting today ? | 14:27 |
| russellb | there was some confusion around keystone v3 in our last nova meeting | 14:27 |
| russellb | particularly around v2 being deprecated, and what that meant for nova (and other projects), if anything | 14:28 |
| ttx | russellb: sounds like a good topic | 14:28 |
| russellb | i was able to catch up with dolph a bit since then, but yeah, still sounds like a good thing to sync on | 14:28 |
| ttx | russellb: please add to http://wiki.openstack.org/Meetings/ProjectMeeting | 14:28 |
| russellb | k will do | 14:28 |
| ttx | ok guys, thx and talk to you all later | 14:28 |
| russellb | thanks! | 14:28 |
| johnthetubaguy | +1 | 14:29 |
| *** david-lyle has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 14:31 | |
| ttx | david-lyle: o/ | 14:31 |
| *** markmcclain has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 14:32 | |
| *** markmcclain has quit IRC | 14:32 | |
| david-lyle | o/ | 14:33 |
| ttx | https://launchpad.net/horizon/+milestone/icehouse-rc1 | 14:33 |
| ttx | 14 bugs | 14:33 |
| *** markmcclain has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 14:33 | |
| ttx | david-lyle: looks like we can remove https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1291431 from list | 14:33 |
| david-lyle | yes | 14:34 |
| david-lyle | done | 14:34 |
| ttx | What about the other two that are not set "in progress" | 14:36 |
| ttx | Ar ethose likely to get fixed this week ? | 14:36 |
| ttx | Are they both release-critical ? | 14:36 |
| david-lyle | 1292937 is a translation issue, but we could go without | 14:37 |
| david-lyle | 1239757 is dependent on a keystoneclient patch | 14:38 |
| david-lyle | we should ship without that too | 14:38 |
| ttx | dolphm: are you considering https://review.openstack.org/#/c/59914/ for 0.7.0 ? | 14:38 |
| david-lyle | removed milestone on the second | 14:38 |
| david-lyle | would be nice to have, but didn't have in icehouse either | 14:39 |
| david-lyle | I mean havana | 14:39 |
| ttx | OK, looks like we could tag early next week ? | 14:39 |
| ttx | maybe end of this week ? | 14:39 |
| david-lyle | I think so | 14:39 |
| david-lyle | depending on fast we can get reviews done | 14:39 |
| ttx | OK, let's aim at early next week | 14:40 |
| david-lyle | sounds good | 14:40 |
| ttx | anything youy'd like to discuss at meeting later ? | 14:41 |
| david-lyle | no, I'm set | 14:41 |
| ttx | cool, ttyl | 14:41 |
| david-lyle | later | 14:41 |
| *** tjones1 has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 14:48 | |
| dolphm | ttx: yes, i'd like to have it in 0.7.0 -- i'll put in on the list for today | 14:59 |
| *** johnthetubaguy has quit IRC | 15:15 | |
| *** johnthetubaguy has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 15:16 | |
| *** tjones1 has left #openstack-relmgr-office | 15:20 | |
| notmyname | ttx: hello | 15:33 |
| ttx | hi! | 15:33 |
| notmyname | ttx: did you see my email (from about 10 hours ago)? | 15:33 |
| *** reed has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 15:34 | |
| ttx | notmyname: I did | 15:34 |
| ttx | notmyname: and I heartily support that direction | 15:34 |
| notmyname | ttx: that's basically what I was hinting at last week :-) | 15:34 |
| notmyname | ttx: ya, it was a tough call (and caused me a ton of stress in the past several weeks) ;-) | 15:34 |
| ttx | notmyname: how far are you from a RC1 tag ? bearing in mind that QA can happen after we tag for this one | 15:34 |
| notmyname | but it's the right one | 15:34 |
| notmyname | ttx: I did a little LP cleanup this morning, and I've looked at what's landed vs what's in queue | 15:35 |
| ttx | notmyname: yes, synced swift releases are a bit like Ubuntu LTS. You don't really want to be introducing major new features in them | 15:35 |
| ttx | better to do that in the next one | 15:35 |
| notmyname | well on the other hand, having it in the "LTS" also means more people get it :-) | 15:35 |
| ttx | notmyname: it's why Ubuntnu still pushed major things in LTS after all :) | 15:36 |
| notmyname | I suspect that the next release will be 1.13.1 and not 1.14.0, but there's no reason to set that right now | 15:36 |
| ttx | agreed | 15:36 |
| notmyname | but there's nothing worrysome about it | 15:37 |
| notmyname | I'm glad we did the 1.13.0 release already a few weeks ago. that makes this one simpler, IMO | 15:37 |
| notmyname | ttx: so a release near the start of the RC period is what's I'm assuming. any risk or worry with that from your side? | 15:38 |
| ttx | notmyname: no, I prefer start of RC too. I know distributions which started freezing their feature set would like to have a RC1 sooner rather than later too | 15:38 |
| ttx | also will allow you to start landing storage policies incrementally in master, once we branch | 15:38 |
| notmyname | right | 15:38 |
| ttx | notmyname: is https://launchpad.net/swift/+milestone/next-icehouse tracking the remaining work ? | 15:39 |
| * ttx removes the invalid bug from list | 15:39 | |
| notmyname | FWIW, I actually expect to have storage policies pretty soon (maybe even just a few weeks after Icehouse--ie very close to the summit), and I'd like to cut a release asap after those land | 15:39 |
| notmyname | ttx: ya, I'm currently using next-icehouse | 15:39 |
| ttx | notmyname: ok, so if status is accurate there I think early next week would be the earlier that can be completed ? | 15:40 |
| * ttx tries to gather rough ETAs to plan incoming work | 15:42 | |
| notmyname | ttx: I know that it's not complete yet, but I don't know everything that needs to be added. eg there is one patch in gerrit that must go it pre-icehouse. but next week seems reasonable | 15:42 |
| ttx | notmyname: ok | 15:42 |
| ttx | notmyname: any specific topic for meeting later ? | 15:42 |
| notmyname | assuming that the ceilometer stuff has been resolve (which I need to follow up with clarkb on), I don't have anything | 15:43 |
| ttx | notmyname: ok, just add it to the meeting wikipage if it's not | 15:44 |
| ttx | notmyname: thx! | 15:44 |
| *** markwash has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 15:46 | |
| ttx | markwash: o/ | 15:49 |
| markwash | ttx: hi there | 15:50 |
| ttx | https://launchpad.net/glance/+milestone/icehouse-rc1 | 15:50 |
| ttx | 3 bugs left | 15:50 |
| ttx | markwash: how close are those last 3 ? | 15:51 |
| markwash | I think only 1279000 should make the cut | 15:51 |
| markwash | the others have been stalled for some time | 15:51 |
| ttx | markwash: how about we remove the other two from list, and if they make it before the other one then good | 15:52 |
| ttx | That would allow us to tag RC1 on ~ Thursday | 15:52 |
| markwash | agreed | 15:52 |
| * ttx prunes | 15:52 | |
| ttx | might trigger more activity | 15:53 |
| ttx | OK, I think we are good here | 15:54 |
| *** hub_cap has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 15:54 | |
| ttx | Any additional topic for meetign later ? | 15:54 |
| markwash | yeah it looks like the last bug has been moving. . I've been a bit out of it unfortunately | 15:54 |
| markwash | no I've no items for today | 15:54 |
| ttx | OK, we'll talk on Thursday and cut if ready then | 15:55 |
| ttx | markwash: thx! | 15:55 |
| hub_cap | if u need someone to cut markwash, im close | 15:55 |
| markwash | see you later | 15:55 |
| ttx | hub_cap: want to run now ? | 15:55 |
| markwash | lol | 15:55 |
| hub_cap | ill do it for a pack of cigs | 15:55 |
| hub_cap | ttx for sure :) | 15:55 |
| ttx | hub_cap: only if you cut him with a cig cutter. | 15:55 |
| markwash | I will give you two packs to *not* cut me :-) | 15:55 |
| hub_cap | ill shank markwash till next wednesday for that | 15:55 |
| hub_cap | markwash: its the fun of the look in your "et tu brute" eyes | 15:55 |
| ttx | hub_cap: https://launchpad.net/trove/+milestone/icehouse-rc1 | 15:56 |
| hub_cap | lol ttx | 15:56 |
| hub_cap | yessir :) | 15:56 |
| ttx | hub_cap: you look all set | 15:56 |
| hub_cap | ya we have a doc thing that doesnt really matter | 15:56 |
| ttx | I propose we cut tomorrow if you're still looking as good | 15:56 |
| hub_cap | and i think we need to do the transifex import (its in flight but w/o a bug listing) | 15:56 |
| hub_cap | the transifex should come before rc1 right? | 15:56 |
| ttx | hub_cap: yes it should | 15:57 |
| hub_cap | cool. so when is "The cut"? | 15:57 |
| ttx | a reasonably-current transifex import should be in | 15:57 |
| hub_cap | besides the one imma do to markwash | 15:57 |
| markwash | ohhkay | 15:57 |
| ttx | hub_cap: the cut is when ready, asap | 15:57 |
| hub_cap | ok cool | 15:57 |
| hub_cap | the transifex stuff mightve been merged, sec | 15:57 |
| hub_cap | yuup | 15:58 |
| ttx | but then I don't want to trash it the next day | 15:58 |
| hub_cap | aww yer no fun | 15:58 |
| ttx | so reasonable confidence that it's not too bad is good to have | 15:58 |
| hub_cap | i say cut a rc1 daily ;) eventually u will be right | 15:58 |
| hub_cap | yes i think that we are in that state | 15:58 |
| hub_cap | ill confirm w/ core (Gimme 30 min) | 15:58 |
| ttx | nobody tests dailies, which is why I do RCs instead :) | 15:58 |
| hub_cap | and ill talk to u either before the meeting or during | 15:58 |
| hub_cap | loll | 15:58 |
| ttx | hub_cap: We'll wait for tomorrow anyway | 15:59 |
| hub_cap | ok perfect. ill give u word today | 15:59 |
| ttx | hub_cap: ping me when you get up and confirm that you're still looking good | 15:59 |
| hub_cap | and u can cut while im sleeping :) | 15:59 |
| ttx | hub_cap: gives you today to chase loose ends | 15:59 |
| hub_cap | awesome | 15:59 |
| hub_cap | and no Qs for the aftn meeting | 15:59 |
| hub_cap | :D | 15:59 |
| * hub_cap knows the format | 15:59 | |
| ttx | cool | 15:59 |
| ttx | ttyl then | 16:00 |
| hub_cap | yesssssir | 16:00 |
| hub_cap | thx dude | 16:00 |
| david-lyle | ttx: requirements freeze today, does that include all version increases as well? | 16:14 |
| ttx | david-lyle: yes, but exceptions are ok | 16:15 |
| ttx | as long as they are properly communicated | 16:15 |
| david-lyle | ok, thanks, just wanted to clarify | 16:15 |
| sdague | and low risk | 16:15 |
| ttx | the trick is to avoid putting distributions in a difficult situation by bumping the minimum supported version | 16:15 |
| david-lyle | sure, understood | 16:15 |
| david-lyle | openstack-auth is waiting on translations | 16:16 |
| david-lyle | is why I ask | 16:16 |
| david-lyle | don't want to release without them | 16:16 |
| sdague | david-lyle: why would that require a requirements change? | 16:16 |
| david-lyle | sdague, there are bug fixes too, that Horizon would like to leverage | 16:17 |
| david-lyle | before releasing and bumping the required version | 16:17 |
| sdague | david-lyle: right, but the old version still works right? | 16:17 |
| david-lyle | yeah, so we are considering leaving the requirement untouched, just wanted to verify what the policy is | 16:18 |
| david-lyle | and just tell users to grab the newest | 16:18 |
| sdague | yeh, it's a discussion for summit, but I think we're bumping min versions too much when it can be user decision to pick up the bug fixes, not a hard fail if they don't | 16:19 |
| david-lyle | sure, that makes sense to me | 16:19 |
| *** markwash has quit IRC | 16:20 | |
| *** markwash has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 16:23 | |
| *** markwash_ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 16:48 | |
| *** markwash has quit IRC | 16:49 | |
| *** markwash_ is now known as markwash | 16:49 | |
| *** markmcclain1 has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 17:01 | |
| *** markmcclain1 has quit IRC | 17:01 | |
| *** markmcclain1 has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 17:02 | |
| *** markmcclain has quit IRC | 17:02 | |
| *** morganfainberg_Z is now known as morganfainberg | 17:04 | |
| *** markmcclain1 has quit IRC | 17:36 | |
| *** markmcclain has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 17:46 | |
| *** markmcclain has quit IRC | 17:58 | |
| *** johnthetubaguy has quit IRC | 18:36 | |
| *** markwash has quit IRC | 19:08 | |
| stevebaker | ttx: \o | 19:30 |
| ttx | stevebaker: o/ | 19:33 |
| ttx | https://launchpad.net/heat/+milestone/icehouse-rc1 | 19:33 |
| ttx | 13 bugs left | 19:33 |
| stevebaker | yep | 19:34 |
| ttx | a bit too many -- are all those release-critical ? | 19:34 |
| stevebaker | probably not | 19:34 |
| ttx | stevebaker: might be good to refine to true blockers... anything that makes it until those are closed will also be included | 19:35 |
| ttx | that will help in defining "ready" | 19:35 |
| stevebaker | yeah, I'm going through now. A lot would have landed by now if more reviews were happening | 19:35 |
| ttx | I feel like you'll be a bit late if we keep so many on the critical list | 19:35 |
| ttx | stevebaker: those should be safe to remove, since they will make it in the following days | 19:36 |
| stevebaker | I'm keeping an eye on the worm, even neutron are about to pass us!! | 19:36 |
| ttx | So even with the list refined I think you won't be ready this week, so we should target early next week | 19:37 |
| ttx | does that make sense ? | 19:37 |
| stevebaker | yes, I'll crack the whip at tomorrow's meeting | 19:37 |
| ttx | OK, we'll reveiw progress on Thursday and readjust if necessary | 19:38 |
| ttx | the sooner the better | 19:38 |
| ttx | stevebaker: anything you'd like to add to the agenda for the meeting ? | 19:38 |
| stevebaker | ok, I'll spend today requesting specific reviews too | 19:38 |
| stevebaker | nothing to add | 19:39 |
| ttx | ok, ttyl | 19:39 |
| stevebaker | o/ | 19:40 |
| *** markwash has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 20:49 | |
| *** russellb has quit IRC | 21:47 | |
| *** dolphm has quit IRC | 21:47 | |
| *** russellb has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 21:48 | |
| *** dolphm has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 21:50 | |
| *** markwash_ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 22:12 | |
| *** markwash has quit IRC | 22:14 | |
| *** markwash_ is now known as markwash | 22:14 | |
| *** david-lyle has quit IRC | 23:08 | |
| *** markmcclain has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 23:10 | |
| *** markmcclain1 has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 23:11 | |
| *** markmcclain has quit IRC | 23:15 | |
| *** markmcclain1 has quit IRC | 23:30 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!