| *** david_lyle has quit IRC | 00:44 | |
| *** zaneb has quit IRC | 01:37 | |
| *** zaneb has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 01:49 | |
| *** markmcclain has quit IRC | 02:36 | |
| *** morganfainberg is now known as morganfainberg_Z | 03:39 | |
| *** markmcclain has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 03:59 | |
| *** markmcclain has quit IRC | 04:04 | |
| *** david_lyle_ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 04:23 | |
| *** david_lyle_ has quit IRC | 10:21 | |
| *** markmcclain has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 13:06 | |
| ttx | markmcclain: o/ | 13:06 |
|---|---|---|
| markmcclain | ttx: ping | 13:06 |
| markmcclain | sorry.. didn't realize my client wasn't connected | 13:07 |
| ttx | https://launchpad.net/neutron/+milestone/icehouse-3 | 13:07 |
| ttx | Wondering if we could consider https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/neutron-quota-extension complete | 13:08 |
| ttx | with the merging of https://review.openstack.org/#/c/69803/ | 13:08 |
| markmcclain | yes… just changed to implemented | 13:08 |
| ttx | the remaining bits (tempest, neutronclient) are a bit separate | 13:08 |
| ttx | same for https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/ml2-binding-profile | 13:09 |
| ttx | with the merging of https://review.openstack.org/#/c/73500/ | 13:09 |
| markmcclain | oh cool that merged while I was asleep | 13:09 |
| markmcclain | fixed the status | 13:10 |
| ttx | ok, so with those two in, we are at... | 13:10 |
| ttx | come on magic script | 13:10 |
| ttx | 22% done, 68% under review, 10% in progress, 0% not started | 13:10 |
| ttx | (considering >Low only) | 13:11 |
| ttx | so ideally you should be around 40% done | 13:11 |
| markmcclain | agreed | 13:11 |
| markmcclain | we did a huge round of reviews the last few days | 13:11 |
| ttx | but otherwise that looks good (less than 20% in progress) | 13:11 |
| markmcclain | some of super close to merging | 13:11 |
| ttx | aand 0% not started | 13:11 |
| markmcclain | we've been actively deferring items that weren't ready for review ontime | 13:12 |
| ttx | markmcclain: if there is anything you would consider a FFE for if it didn't make it this week, you should make sure it's set to "medium" prio or above | 13:12 |
| ttx | (ideally, "high") | 13:13 |
| ttx | that will simplify tracking | 13:13 |
| markmcclain | this is only item I've got on my short list for an FFE: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/ml2-deprecated-plugin-migration | 13:13 |
| ttx | ok | 13:13 |
| markmcclain | we've run into a problem with the service type framework | 13:13 |
| markmcclain | depending on how we solve it | 13:13 |
| markmcclain | the FFE list might grow 3-4 more | 13:14 |
| ttx | Your bug list is a bit huge, i expect we'll defer most of them next week | 13:14 |
| ttx | so it's a bit useless as a prioritization tool as-is | 13:14 |
| ttx | but i don't have strong feelings about that | 13:14 |
| markmcclain | outside of the critical/high items yes | 13:14 |
| ttx | https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1244255 -> incomplete, unassigned but still targeted ? | 13:15 |
| ttx | should I just untarget it ? | 13:15 |
| markmcclain | hmmm.. actually it was an I-1 item | 13:16 |
| markmcclain | that had a fix merged on Nov 1st | 13:16 |
| ttx | ok, will adjust | 13:16 |
| ttx | markmcclain: that's all I had. Sent you an email last week about a number of security issues / needed reviews | 13:16 |
| ttx | we could also use some progress there | 13:16 |
| ttx | or just designate folks for neutron-coresec and I'll bother them instead | 13:17 |
| markmcclain | we've been working through those items too | 13:17 |
| ttx | (no detail over public channel) | 13:17 |
| ttx | ok, anything you'd like to discuss at the meeting later ? | 13:17 |
| markmcclain | I know we've opened a few of the reports because they were known limitations | 13:17 |
| markmcclain | nothing new right now, I'll go back over the sec issue list | 13:18 |
| ttx | we removed one of them, but the other still needs some in-bug review | 13:18 |
| ttx | dhellmann: around? | 13:18 |
| dhellmann | hi! | 13:18 |
| ttx | dhellmann: hola | 13:18 |
| ttx | https://launchpad.net/oslo/+milestone/icehouse-3 | 13:19 |
| dhellmann | I just moved a few more finished bugs into that list, so you may want to reload your page | 13:19 |
| dhellmann | I'll finish going through the list of "fix committed" bugs today | 13:19 |
| ttx | progress in just on track | 13:19 |
| dhellmann | I do have a couple of questions | 13:20 |
| ttx | 40% done | 13:20 |
| dhellmann | we finished the code for the log message translation blueprint but need to change the catalog job, but we're very close to string freeze so maybe that is going to have to wait for juno? | 13:20 |
| * ttx reads | 13:21 | |
| ttx | yeah, that sounds like something you would rather want to push early in the cycle than late | 13:21 |
| dhellmann | right, ok, so is that "deferred" or do we call this one done and create a new blueprint for the rollout? | 13:21 |
| ttx | IIUC the oslo part is done, we need infra support for it ? | 13:22 |
| dhellmann | yeah, I was going to do that work but they have to merge it | 13:22 |
| ttx | but infra support is deferred because we are nearing money time | 13:22 |
| dhellmann | heh | 13:22 |
| ttx | so i would consider the oslo part "implemented" | 13:22 |
| ttx | and try not to forget to push that on the infra side early in Juno | 13:23 |
| dhellmann | ok, good, I'll create a new blueprint for juno for the remaining pieces then | 13:23 |
| dhellmann | yeah, definitely | 13:23 |
| ttx | dhellmann: what we raelly need here would be multiproject blueprints :) | 13:23 |
| * ttx is getting excited again | 13:23 | |
| dhellmann | +1000 | 13:23 |
| ttx | Will talk to you off-1:1 about a few things, since Oslo would benefit so much from smart project grouping | 13:24 |
| ttx | so yeah, I 'd amrk that one implemented | 13:24 |
| dhellmann | done | 13:24 |
| ttx | https://launchpad.net/oslo.messaging/+milestone/icehouse-3 | 13:24 |
| dhellmann | and yes, I expect tracking changes in all of these libraries to be a mess if we don't have some nice relational views | 13:25 |
| dhellmann | we still have a few up for review there, too | 13:25 |
| ttx | Is notification-subscriber-server likely to get merged in time ? | 13:25 |
| dhellmann | we only have 2 commits, and one is in the "fake" driver, so I think we have a good chance | 13:26 |
| ttx | ok | 13:26 |
| dhellmann | I'm going to review it today when I get to the office | 13:26 |
| ttx | anything you'd like us to discuss at the meeting later ? | 13:26 |
| dhellmann | no, I don't think so | 13:26 |
| ttx | ok then. Talk to you later | 13:27 |
| dhellmann | thanks! | 13:27 |
| ttx | jd__: ready when you are | 13:29 |
| jd__ | ttx: let's go | 13:29 |
| ttx | https://launchpad.net/ceilometer/+milestone/icehouse-3 | 13:30 |
| ttx | On te bright side you don't have too much in review, and have a good finalization rate | 13:30 |
| ttx | But way too much is still "in progress" and without final code proposed | 13:31 |
| jd__ | agreed | 13:31 |
| jd__ | now I'm thinking about dropping everything that is not (almost) in review | 13:31 |
| ttx | what's the main issue ? Would focusing the efforts help ? Or is that spread out across enough people anyway ? | 13:32 |
| jd__ | I think most things that are not in review now won't be proposed soon now | 13:32 |
| ttx | jd__: The idea would be to finalize as much as you can. Better get a few of them to 100% rather than all of them at 98% | 13:32 |
| jd__ | so it's better to delay them right now and focus on what's proposed | 13:32 |
| ttx | exactly | 13:33 |
| jd__ | so I'm going to do that :) | 13:33 |
| ttx | Or give them until the end of the day to push code, defer after | 13:33 |
| ttx | sort of a Feature proposal freeze, one week later | 13:33 |
| jd__ | yep | 13:34 |
| ttx | or just defer it and if something gets proposed, reconsider it | 13:34 |
| *** dolphm_503 is now known as dolphm | 13:34 | |
| ttx | jd__: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+spec/sql-unit-tests-on-real-backend is marked essential though | 13:34 |
| jd__ | ttx: yes, but it's not going to make it entirely | 13:34 |
| jd__ | we did a lot of efforts and the blueprint has been partially implemented | 13:34 |
| jd__ | but the main contributor disappeared | 13:34 |
| ttx | oh, ok. So it's already complete enough | 13:35 |
| jd__ | yeah we had a lot of improvement | 13:35 |
| ttx | more of a continuing effort | 13:35 |
| jd__ | we'll continue and I'll reschedule for J | 13:35 |
| ttx | yeah, or split it and mark the icehouse part "implemented" | 13:35 |
| jd__ | yeah – though as it's more QA than a feature I'm not worried it's not listed there | 13:36 |
| ttx | anything you'd ask FFE for ? Make sure that's prioritized above "Low" if any | 13:36 |
| jd__ | I don't think so, but I'll double check | 13:37 |
| ttx | you can use the future/ongoing milestone if that's a neverending effort | 13:37 |
| jd__ | good idea | 13:37 |
| ttx | https://launchpad.net/ceilometer/+milestone/ongoing | 13:38 |
| ttx | OK, so we should be OK once you're done with the aggressive deferring | 13:38 |
| ttx | anything you'd like to discuss at meeting later ? | 13:38 |
| jgriffith | ttx: when you're ready | 13:39 |
| ttx | jgriffith: finishing with jd, should take a minute | 13:39 |
| jd__ | ttx: no, and I might be absent tonight | 13:40 |
| ttx | ok, noted | 13:40 |
| ttx | jd__: thanks! | 13:40 |
| jd__ | you're welcome :) | 13:40 |
| ttx | jgriffith: o/ | 13:40 |
| ttx | https://launchpad.net/cinder/+milestone/icehouse-3 | 13:40 |
| ttx | jgriffith: a couple of undefined sneaked in | 13:41 |
| ttx | jgriffith: IIRC you participated in the Feature proposal freeze last week, but there are still a lot of blueprints which are not "needs code review" and still targeted | 13:43 |
| ttx | do you have plans to clean them up ? | 13:43 |
| ttx | Looks like I lost jgriffith | 13:45 |
| jgriffith | ttx: sorry | 13:45 |
| jgriffith | was deep in thought | 13:46 |
| ttx | welcome back | 13:46 |
| jgriffith | :) | 13:46 |
| jgriffith | Looking now | 13:46 |
| ttx | will let you consume all my questions | 13:46 |
| jgriffith | Yeah, two new ones | 13:47 |
| jgriffith | I'll get that sorted today | 13:47 |
| jgriffith | remove them | 13:47 |
| ttx | so, what about those blueprints which are not "needs code review" ? Does your "remove them" answer apply to that ? | 13:49 |
| jgriffith | ttx: You and your difficult questions | 13:50 |
| jgriffith | They're about out of time yes | 13:50 |
| jgriffith | I will cull again today | 13:50 |
| jgriffith | but most of those people are making good progress | 13:51 |
| jgriffith | at least as of last check | 13:51 |
| jgriffith | the only one who wasn't was me :) | 13:51 |
| ttx | jgriffith: the trick is, will they propose code early enough to let you review and merge ? With the expected end of week bottlenecks ? | 13:51 |
| ttx | Only one week left. | 13:51 |
| jgriffith | ttx: so the word I've given everybody is that tomorrow is the day to have code in gerrit | 13:52 |
| ttx | ok | 13:52 |
| jgriffith | If you have no code by then you're too late | 13:52 |
| jgriffith | IMO | 13:52 |
| ttx | Anything you'd consider a FFE for ? | 13:52 |
| ttx | If yes, maybe promote it to "High" | 13:52 |
| jgriffith | NOt really | 13:52 |
| ttx | good! | 13:52 |
| jgriffith | The only one is the filtering/weighing but there's pretty much zero chance that gets in | 13:53 |
| ttx | last question would be.. any topic you want to add to the meeting's agenda ? | 13:53 |
| jgriffith | No.... but I may ping you later if that changes | 13:53 |
| ttx | ack | 13:54 |
| ttx | talk to you later | 13:54 |
| jgriffith | ttx: thanks | 13:54 |
| *** markmcclain has quit IRC | 14:56 | |
| dolphm | ttx: o/ | 15:00 |
| *** johnthetubaguy has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 15:01 | |
| ttx | dolphm: o/ | 15:02 |
| ttx | https://launchpad.net/keystone/+milestone/icehouse-3 | 15:03 |
| ttx | 76% done, 23% under review, 0% in progress, 0% not started | 15:03 |
| ttx | Looks good | 15:04 |
| ttx | You have a couple of targeted-but-unassigned bugs | 15:04 |
| ttx | that you might want to assign or untarget | 15:05 |
| dolphm | assigned one - there's already a WIP against it | 15:05 |
| ttx | dolphm: we discuss kite at the TC later, will you be around ? | 15:06 |
| dolphm | ttx: yes | 15:06 |
| ttx | anything you'd grant a FFE for if it doesn't make it in this week ? | 15:06 |
| dolphm | ttx: is the issue down to "integrated" vs "other" ? | 15:07 |
| dolphm | saml-id is the only possible FFE i can foresee, but i don't think it's going to miss tuesday https://review.openstack.org/#/c/71353/ | 15:07 |
| ttx | dolphm: not really. It can't be "integrated" for icehouse anyway | 15:07 |
| ttx | integration needs a full cycle, even in the case of project splits where we fasttrack incubation | 15:08 |
| ttx | dolphm: my main question is what's the long-term plan with barbican vs. kite | 15:08 |
| ttx | but we should discuss that at the TC, not now | 15:08 |
| dolphm | i'll rope in jraim as well then | 15:08 |
| ttx | yep, could be useful | 15:09 |
| ttx | Any topic you'd like to add to the cross-project meeting agenda ? | 15:09 |
| dolphm | i just want to be clear on the goal of the TC meeting today | 15:09 |
| dolphm | nope | 15:09 |
| ttx | For precision on the goal, see my answer at http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-tc/2014-February/000540.html | 15:10 |
| dolphm | ttx: ah, thanks | 15:10 |
| *** tjones has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 15:11 | |
| ttx | i.e. we don't vet project additions, we can just object to some of them when we feel it oversteps the boundaries that were previously set | 15:11 |
| ttx | so we do not discuss them unless someone complains about them | 15:11 |
| ttx | (obviously we do vet them if you file for incubation/integration in the common release) | 15:12 |
| ttx | Oh. Actually that's what you pushed there . Hm. | 15:13 |
| dolphm | ttx: sort of - patchset 1 and 2 are different... i wasn't sure what the "correct" proposal was (i figured it would be integrated at some point, but wasn't sure where it should start) | 15:14 |
| dolphm | ttx: afk for 15 min | 15:14 |
| ttx | ack | 15:14 |
| russellb | ttx: o/ nova ready whenever you are. tjones and johnthetubaguy joining now too | 15:18 |
| tjones | hi guys | 15:18 |
| johnthetubaguy | hi | 15:18 |
| ttx | hi! | 15:19 |
| ttx | sorry bit late | 15:19 |
| tjones | no worries | 15:19 |
| ttx | https://launchpad.net/nova/+milestone/icehouse-3 | 15:19 |
| ttx | nice cleanup | 15:19 |
| ttx | Still, 60 on the review pile | 15:20 |
| russellb | merging what we can this week ... | 15:20 |
| russellb | guess we'll just do another mass deferral next week after freeze | 15:20 |
| ttx | Just looking at the >Low (and adding the implemented Lows) it looks quite good: | 15:20 |
| ttx | 61% done, 34% under review, 3% in progress, 0% not started | 15:20 |
| russellb | cool | 15:20 |
| ttx | the problem is that with so many Lows it doesn't make much sense as a metric | 15:21 |
| russellb | we also seem to end up with a bunch of "mostly implemented" blueprints every cycle | 15:21 |
| johnthetubaguy | yeah, we must get better at the priorties | 15:21 |
| johnthetubaguy | we have a sort of plan to fix that now, at least | 15:21 |
| ttx | russellb, johnthetubaguy: would be good to bump at least to Medium for those you MIGHT ask a FFE for | 15:21 |
| russellb | OK | 15:22 |
| johnthetubaguy | that seems like a top plan | 15:22 |
| ttx | and High/Essential for those you WILL ask a FFE for | 15:22 |
| ttx | that's a way to differentiate, slightly better than "dare core signed up to review them" | 15:22 |
| ttx | are* | 15:22 |
| johnthetubaguy | yeah, I like that | 15:22 |
| ttx | should help convey "this is actually likely to make it | 15:23 |
| ttx | ' | 15:23 |
| russellb | johnthetubaguy: sounds like a good goal for us this week, continue to tweak priorities using above criteria | 15:23 |
| ttx | also will help in deferring a bunch if they don't make the cut | 15:23 |
| johnthetubaguy | russellb: +1 | 15:23 |
| ttx | like we can assume the Low ones will get deferred if they don't make the cut | 15:23 |
| johnthetubaguy | ttx: makes total sense, thanks | 15:24 |
| johnthetubaguy | I like that | 15:24 |
| ttx | russellb: are you planning some special happening to get as many of those in as you can this week ? | 15:24 |
| russellb | nothing special | 15:24 |
| ttx | because the other way to look at it it to push those that are 99% there to 100%, regardless of prio | 15:25 |
| russellb | johnthetubaguy: think a "review blueprint code" day makes any sense? | 15:25 |
| johnthetubaguy | russellb: maybe, if people do it, worth a try | 15:26 |
| russellb | johnthetubaguy: i mean, in theory everyone is doing that anyway ... | 15:26 |
| johnthetubaguy | right | 15:26 |
| ttx | russellb: are those mostly blocked on the reviewer effort, or on developer feedback ? | 15:26 |
| russellb | maybe i should just email nova-core a reminder about the freeze | 15:26 |
| ttx | russellb: +1 | 15:26 |
| russellb | some of both, but mostly reviewer effort | 15:26 |
| *** david_lyle_ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 15:26 | |
| russellb | i think | 15:26 |
| ttx | russellb: yes. a Review moneytime email | 15:27 |
| johnthetubaguy | yeah, I nudge should help | 15:27 |
| johnthetubaguy | once we have the priorities updated | 15:27 |
| russellb | ok, i'll send a nudge | 15:27 |
| *** david_lyle_ is now known as david_lyle | 15:27 | |
| johnthetubaguy | well, once we get the list in order I guess? | 15:28 |
| russellb | tjones: and after next week focus is all bugs :) | 15:28 |
| russellb | mostly anyway | 15:28 |
| johnthetubaguy | russellb: true | 15:28 |
| tjones | that's right | 15:28 |
| russellb | johnthetubaguy: sure, we can do a first pass today | 15:28 |
| ttx | tjones: yes, after feature freeze we basically build a list of release-blocking bugs | 15:28 |
| johnthetubaguy | russellb: +1 | 15:28 |
| *** markmcclain has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 15:28 | |
| tjones | that's why i want to get the untriaged ones done asap | 15:28 |
| russellb | johnthetubaguy: but want to send the nudge soon | 15:28 |
| ttx | and we issue RC1 when we are done with them | 15:28 |
| ttx | tjones: so having a general idea of where the critical issues are is a good thing | 15:29 |
| ttx | russellb: anything you'd like to disucss at meeting later ? | 15:29 |
| russellb | don't think so | 15:29 |
| ttx | russellb: V2/V3 sounds a bit Nova-centric | 15:29 |
| russellb | yes | 15:30 |
| russellb | mostly anyway | 15:30 |
| ttx | other projects don't have the exact same issue | 15:30 |
| russellb | though there are some other examples ... glance v1/v2, keystone v2/v3 ... | 15:30 |
| russellb | but don't think we need to talk about it | 15:30 |
| ttx | I tried to summarize the dilemma in my small contribution to that thread | 15:30 |
| russellb | ttx: yes, was a very good summary | 15:30 |
| *** david_lyle_ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 15:31 | |
| russellb | ttx: it's a really tough situation | 15:31 |
| ttx | russellb: i think we need a bit more analysis of how we could live forever with V2 | 15:31 |
| ttx | because if you dump V3, it's not to do a new V3 tomorrow | 15:31 |
| russellb | yeah, perhaps that'd be a good strawman ... a more concrete proposal for "v2 forever" | 15:31 |
| russellb | that people can poke holes in] | 15:31 |
| ttx | yes, I thiunk it boils down to: can we live with V2 forever. If not, what shall we dop to V3 to ensure we can live with it together (and bite the maintenance bullet) | 15:32 |
| ttx | errr | 15:32 |
| ttx | s/together/forever/ | 15:32 |
| * russellb nods | 15:34 | |
| russellb | will keep pushing this | 15:34 |
| ttx | anyway, off-topic | 15:34 |
| ttx | david-lyle: around ? | 15:34 |
| russellb | thanks ttx johnthetubaguy tjones ! | 15:34 |
| david_lyle_ | o/ | 15:34 |
| johnthetubaguy | russellb: np | 15:34 |
| ttx | in three different avatars I see | 15:34 |
| ttx | should be thrice as fast | 15:34 |
| tjones | russellb: talk to u later | 15:34 |
| russellb | david-lyle: david_lyle david_lyle_ wow | 15:34 |
| ttx | russellb, johnthetubaguy, tjones: thx! | 15:35 |
| *** david_lyle has quit IRC | 15:35 | |
| *** david-lyle is now known as dklyle | 15:35 | |
| johnthetubaguy | ttx: thanks, catch you next week, if not before | 15:35 |
| ttx | https://launchpad.net/horizon/+milestone/icehouse-3 | 15:35 |
| *** david_lyle_ is now known as david_lyle | 15:35 | |
| ttx | now that's confusing | 15:35 |
| russellb | http://wiki.znc.in/ZNC :-) | 15:35 |
| *** david_lyle_ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 15:36 | |
| ttx | david*_*lyle*: prefill-create-a-new-volume-device-size-min-requirements looks implemenetd to me | 15:36 |
| *** tjones has left #openstack-relmgr-office | 15:36 | |
| ttx | with the merging of https://review.openstack.org/68381 ? | 15:36 |
| david_lyle_ | ttx: yes merged recently | 15:37 |
| ttx | same question for daily-usage-report with the merging of https://review.openstack.org/#/c/72783/ | 15:37 |
| david_lyle_ | that too just merged | 15:38 |
| david_lyle_ | but yes done | 15:38 |
| ttx | ok updated | 15:38 |
| ttx | 42% done, 42% under review, 14% in progress, 0% not started | 15:39 |
| ttx | Looking on track, still needs lots of reviews this week | 15:39 |
| *** david_lyle has quit IRC | 15:39 | |
| david_lyle_ | a lot of reviews needed, short on core reviewers | 15:40 |
| david_lyle_ | and not a pool to draw from really | 15:40 |
| ttx | neutron-subnet-mode-support is marked Blocked | 15:40 |
| ttx | want us to talk about it at meeting later ? | 15:40 |
| ttx | the dependency on neutron/ipv6-two-attributes | 15:41 |
| dklyle | sure | 15:41 |
| ttx | ok | 15:41 |
| *** david-lyle has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 15:41 | |
| ttx | You may also want to aggressively defer the oens that don't have code proposed yet | 15:42 |
| ttx | unless you know that code is coming and the review is pretty basic | 15:42 |
| ttx | (and can be coimpleted in the remaining 7 days) | 15:42 |
| david-lyle | couple are basic and one is a high want | 15:42 |
| ttx | Anything you'd ask a FFE for if they fail to make it in time ? | 15:43 |
| david-lyle | so to be clear March 5 is the deadline to merge bps correct? | 15:43 |
| ttx | (if yes, consider moving them to High) | 15:43 |
| ttx | EOB March 4 | 15:43 |
| david-lyle | the ipv6 may be FFE material | 15:43 |
| david-lyle | import feature to neutron, but is landing late | 15:43 |
| ttx | OK, I'll bump it to High | 15:43 |
| david-lyle | we have a patch ready | 15:44 |
| david-lyle | The other FFE possibility may be Django 1.6 support | 15:45 |
| ttx | david-lyle: ok | 15:45 |
| *** david_lyle_ has quit IRC | 15:45 | |
| ttx | david-lyle: depending on how far you are, right | 15:45 |
| david-lyle | really should be in Icehouse release, it's close, but will require a django_openstack_auth release and a change to openstack/requirements | 15:45 |
| ttx | bumping to High too | 15:45 |
| david-lyle | good | 15:46 |
| ttx | OK, on the bugs side, you have a number of unassigned bugs | 15:46 |
| ttx | hmm, I should create the -rc1 milestones so that we can start assigning stuff to those | 15:46 |
| david-lyle | yeah, those will need to bump | 15:47 |
| ttx | ok, maybe wait a bit until I get the RC1 milestone up | 15:47 |
| david-lyle | sure | 15:47 |
| ttx | should be done in one hour | 15:47 |
| david-lyle | ok | 15:47 |
| ttx | final question: any agenda addition for the meeting later ? | 15:47 |
| ttx | I already added the Blocked bp | 15:48 |
| david-lyle | no, I think that's it | 15:48 |
| ttx | ok then, talk to you later | 15:50 |
| david-lyle | ttx: thanks | 15:50 |
| ttx | david-lyle: ok done: https://launchpad.net/horizon/+milestone/icehouse-rc1 | 15:56 |
| david-lyle | I'll start moving bugs then | 15:56 |
| *** hub_cap has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 15:59 | |
| *** dhellmann is now known as dhellmann_ | 16:24 | |
| *** markmcclain has quit IRC | 16:28 | |
| *** markwash has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 16:42 | |
| ttx | markwash: o/ | 16:42 |
| markwash | ttx: greetings | 16:42 |
| ttx | https://launchpad.net/glance/+milestone/icehouse-3 | 16:42 |
| ttx | Looks pretty good | 16:43 |
| markwash | I think those "needs code review" can all land this week | 16:43 |
| markwash | how's the gate looking from your perspective? | 16:43 |
| ttx | Just a bit concerning that the "High" prio ones seem to be the most in jeopardy | 16:43 |
| ttx | and depending on the same person | 16:44 |
| markwash | yes | 16:44 |
| ttx | markwash: gate looks good so far, 1h20 queue at peak of Tuesday | 16:44 |
| ttx | I expect that to grow as we near the end of week though | 16:44 |
| ttx | so as always, review early, merge early | 16:45 |
| markwash | yup! | 16:45 |
| ttx | neutron and nova have tons of patches | 16:45 |
| ttx | they might just end up approving them, one never knows :) | 16:45 |
| markwash | haha | 16:45 |
| markwash | I've been a bit distracted with day job stuff lately, but I'll make a pass through today | 16:46 |
| markwash | should get us on track for landing early this week | 16:46 |
| ttx | markwash: I assume that you won't file FFEs for the "Low" stuff if it misses the mark | 16:46 |
| markwash | nope | 16:46 |
| ttx | if there is anything you WILL ask for FFE for, you can bump them to High | 16:47 |
| * markwash nods | 16:47 | |
| ttx | OK, that's about all I had for you | 16:47 |
| ttx | Any agenda addition for the meeting ? | 16:47 |
| markwash | thanks for commenting on the Murano proposal | 16:47 |
| markwash | no | 16:48 |
| markwash | I suppose I should be filing the mission for glance/images right? | 16:48 |
| markwash | in openstack-governance | 16:48 |
| ttx | markwash: you should yes. That could help in the upcoming debate :) | 16:48 |
| markwash | putting it on my list. . if its on in the next 3 days, it can be part of next weeks tc meeting, right? | 16:49 |
| ttx | markwash: yes | 16:49 |
| markwash | okay cool | 16:49 |
| ttx | hmm | 16:50 |
| ttx | markwash: actually it's before EOB Wednesday | 16:50 |
| markwash | so today would be great :-) | 16:50 |
| ttx | otherwise it misses the '4 business days of open discussion' criteria | 16:51 |
| markwash | shouldn't be *too* hard for this first operation | 16:51 |
| markwash | I suspect the revision to it will be more work | 16:51 |
| ttx | right | 16:51 |
| ttx | markwash: ok, talk to you later! | 16:51 |
| markwash | have a nice evening | 16:52 |
| ttx | hub_cap: ready when you are | 16:52 |
| ttx | hub_cap: o/ | 17:02 |
| ttx | hub_cap: I'll soon need to go, so I'll just dump my remarks/questions here | 17:09 |
| ttx | Good progress on the features. | 17:10 |
| ttx | I assume that those "Low" ones, if they miss the target date, will just get deferred to Juno | 17:10 |
| ttx | You have a number of unassigned bugs. You could push them back to icehouse-rc1 if they don't have an assignee but you find them release-critical | 17:11 |
| ttx | Let me know if you have topics you would like to see discussed at meeting later | 17:11 |
| ttx | hub_cap: If there is anything you will likely ask an exception for if they don't make it in time, they should probably get bumped to "High" level if they aren't already | 17:12 |
| ttx | hub_cap: that's all. Feel free to answer those asynchronously, will catch up in a couple of hours | 17:13 |
| *** markwash has quit IRC | 17:29 | |
| *** markmcclain has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 17:29 | |
| *** dhellmann_ is now known as dhellmann | 17:31 | |
| *** markmcclain1 has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 17:33 | |
| *** markmcclain1 has quit IRC | 17:34 | |
| *** markmcclain1 has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 17:36 | |
| *** markmcclain1 has quit IRC | 17:36 | |
| *** markmcclain has quit IRC | 17:37 | |
| *** markwash has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 17:45 | |
| *** markmcclain has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 17:46 | |
| hub_cap | hey ttx im here, ill catch up | 17:52 |
| hub_cap | Low will likley miss the date, and ill punt. god my internet connection sucks | 17:52 |
| hub_cap | sry, im in a new timezone and its killin me | 17:53 |
| hub_cap | ill triage bugs by COB today | 17:53 |
| hub_cap | im good for topics... the last few wks have been a cluster**** | 17:56 |
| *** morganfainberg_Z is now known as morganfainberg | 17:59 | |
| *** david_lyle_ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 18:03 | |
| *** david_lyle_ is now known as david_lyle | 18:04 | |
| *** jgriffit2 has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 18:07 | |
| *** david-lyle has quit IRC | 18:07 | |
| *** jgriffith has quit IRC | 18:07 | |
| *** zaneb has quit IRC | 18:16 | |
| *** jgriffit2 is now known as jgriffith | 18:21 | |
| *** johnthetubaguy has quit IRC | 18:43 | |
| *** markmcclain has quit IRC | 18:50 | |
| *** markmcclain has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 18:57 | |
| *** markmcclain has quit IRC | 19:04 | |
| *** markmcclain has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 19:05 | |
| *** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC | 19:08 | |
| *** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 19:10 | |
| *** SergeyLukjanov2 has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 19:10 | |
| *** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC | 19:11 | |
| *** SergeyLukjanov2 is now known as SergeyLukjanov | 19:11 | |
| stevebaker | ttx: \o | 19:14 |
| ttx | stevebaker: o/ | 19:31 |
| stevebaker | \o | 19:32 |
| ttx | https://launchpad.net/heat/+milestone/icehouse-3 | 19:32 |
| ttx | you have one untriaged blueprint in | 19:32 |
| ttx | https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/glance-parameter-constraint | 19:32 |
| ttx | 44% done, 37% under review, 17% in progress, 0% not started | 19:33 |
| ttx | so you're on track | 19:33 |
| stevebaker | ttx: fixed that one | 19:33 |
| ttx | just need to keep on the review effort | 19:34 |
| stevebaker | ttx: my gut tells me we'll be asking for some extensions | 19:34 |
| ttx | and get more code proposed | 19:34 |
| ttx | Are all of those exception candidates rated "High" ? | 19:34 |
| stevebaker | ttx: yes | 19:34 |
| ttx | ok | 19:35 |
| ttx | For the bugs you can start deferring to icehouse-rc1 where you feel it won't be done in time for i-3 | 19:35 |
| stevebaker | ok | 19:35 |
| ttx | That's all I had. Anything you'd liek to nadd to the meetign agenda ? | 19:35 |
| ttx | hah | 19:35 |
| ttx | ...like to add to the meeting... | 19:35 |
| ttx | don't drink while typing | 19:36 |
| ttx | stevebaker: last question -- https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/flavor-parameter-constraint is marked implemented but without a milestone set. Should I retroactively add it to i-3 ? | 19:37 |
| stevebaker | I'll check with shardy, but there may be an issue with the keystone policy used in the devstack gate | 19:37 |
| ttx | stevebaker: ok, just raise it in meeting if you need to | 19:37 |
| stevebaker | ttx: fixed | 19:37 |
| ttx | ok then. Talk to you later | 19:37 |
| stevebaker | ok, l8er | 19:37 |
| *** dhellman_ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 20:40 | |
| *** dhellman_ has quit IRC | 20:40 | |
| *** dhellman_ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 20:42 | |
| *** dhellman_ has quit IRC | 21:00 | |
| *** david_lyle is now known as david-lyle | 21:01 | |
| *** dolphm is now known as dolphm_503 | 21:18 | |
| *** dhellman_ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 21:46 | |
| *** dhellman_ has quit IRC | 21:59 | |
| *** dolphm_503 is now known as dolphm | 22:29 | |
| *** openstack has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 23:05 | |
| -dickson.freenode.net- [freenode-info] if you're at a conference and other people are having trouble connecting, please mention it to staff: http://freenode.net/faq.shtml#gettinghelp | 23:05 | |
| *** markmcclain has quit IRC | 23:14 | |
| *** david-lyle has quit IRC | 23:38 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!