| *** openstack has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 00:02 | |
| *** markmcclain has quit IRC | 00:16 | |
| *** markwash has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 04:06 | |
| *** david-lyle has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 04:34 | |
| *** markwash has quit IRC | 04:44 | |
| *** markwash has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 04:56 | |
| *** markwash has quit IRC | 05:22 | |
| *** david-lyle has quit IRC | 08:27 | |
| *** SergeyLukjanov_ is now known as SergeyLukjanov | 09:08 | |
| *** SergeyLukjanov is now known as SergeyLukjanov_a | 11:19 | |
| *** SergeyLukjanov_a is now known as SergeyLukjanov | 11:19 | |
| *** markwash has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 13:00 | |
| *** markmcclain has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 13:00 | |
| ttx | markmcclain: o/ | 13:01 |
|---|---|---|
| markmcclain | o/ | 13:03 |
| ttx | markmcclain: looking at https://launchpad.net/neutron/+milestone/icehouse-3 | 13:03 |
| markmcclain | yeah.. probably too many items given that our code proposal deadline is Feb 18th | 13:04 |
| ttx | was neutron gating fixed recently ? Or still working on it ? | 13:04 |
| markmcclain | it is still broken | 13:04 |
| ttx | 65 total, but 25 in code review already | 13:05 |
| markmcclain | the isolated tests are triggering a kernel fault | 13:05 |
| ttx | markmcclain: I don't think that's crazy.. but if you can't merge them right now then it wil become crazy very fast | 13:05 |
| markmcclain | agreed | 13:06 |
| ttx | markmcclain: you should go through them and prioritize them. Use a lot of "Low" for stuff you have no idea if it will make it, and defer aggressively when the author gives hints that won't be ready by Feb 18 | 13:07 |
| ttx | That will leave us with a number of >=Medium that you can use to prioritize actual work | 13:07 |
| markmcclain | yeah will do | 13:07 |
| ttx | markmcclain: the kernel fault is the dnsmasq thing on the ubuntu kernel ? | 13:08 |
| markmcclain | it's really a namespace issue | 13:08 |
| markmcclain | sometimes it happens in dhcp more often the metadata service triggers it | 13:09 |
| ttx | right, but userspace should obviously not trigger kernelspace error | 13:09 |
| ttx | markmcclain: did you get some support from the Ubuntu side ? | 13:09 |
| markmcclain | they are aware of it | 13:09 |
| markmcclain | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1273386 | 13:10 |
| ttx | hmm, I'll see if I can raise prio with whatever influence I've left at Canonical | 13:10 |
| ttx | markmcclain: so yeah, if you could straighten out that icehouse-3 page, that would be great | 13:11 |
| ttx | will make it easier to spot late submissions, too | 13:11 |
| markmcclain | very true | 13:11 |
| ttx | becaus ethe current mix is a mix of old untriaged stuff and new deferred stuff | 13:12 |
| markmcclain | right | 13:13 |
| ttx | markmcclain: ok, that's all I had -- until that's done it's difficult to assess feasibility :) | 13:14 |
| ttx | anyting you'd like to discuss at meeting later ? | 13:14 |
| markmcclain | not that I can think of right now | 13:14 |
| ttx | markmcclain: are you back in GA ? | 13:15 |
| markmcclain | for this week | 13:15 |
| ttx | markmcclain: ok, enjoy | 13:15 |
| ttx | dhellmann_: ping me when around | 13:16 |
| dhellmann_ | here | 13:16 |
| ttx | hi! | 13:16 |
| markmcclain | ttx: thanks… talk to you later | 13:16 |
| * dhellmann_ fights with status in irc client | 13:16 | |
| *** dhellmann_ is now known as dhellmann | 13:16 | |
| ttx | https://launchpad.net/oslo/+milestone/icehouse-3 | 13:16 |
| ttx | https://launchpad.net/oslo.messaging/+milestone/icehouse-3 | 13:16 |
| dhellmann | I just set the priorities on a few of those oslo blueprints | 13:17 |
| ttx | "Translated log files" -> that one was recently completed (post i2) ? | 13:17 |
| * ttx is trying to catch any missing blueprint that sneaked into i2 | 13:17 | |
| dhellmann | hmm, yeah, that one was actually i2 | 13:17 |
| ttx | I can move it (need to reopen i2 first) | 13:18 |
| dhellmann | ok | 13:18 |
| ttx | ok, oslo looks good | 13:19 |
| dhellmann | cool | 13:20 |
| ttx | moved | 13:20 |
| ttx | oslo.messaging... could use some assignees on those targeted bugs, otherwise looks good | 13:21 |
| dhellmann | indeed | 13:21 |
| ttx | shameless plug: if you could re-APRV https://review.openstack.org/#/c/69033/ I can cut a new oslo.rootwrap version (1.1) | 13:21 |
| ttx | people complain about that missing __init__.py in 1.0 | 13:21 |
| ttx | https://bugs.launchpad.net/oslo/+bug/1273581 | 13:22 |
| dhellmann | what caused patch 3? | 13:22 |
| ttx | rebase, another patch got in | 13:22 |
| ttx | a typo patch | 13:22 |
| dhellmann | +2A | 13:22 |
| ttx | coolthx | 13:23 |
| ttx | will tag once that passes | 13:23 |
| *** markwash has quit IRC | 13:23 | |
| dhellmann | ok | 13:23 |
| ttx | anything you'd like to discuss at meeting later ? | 13:23 |
| dhellmann | not this week | 13:24 |
| dhellmann | I do have something I'd like your opinion on | 13:24 |
| ttx | shoot | 13:24 |
| dhellmann | I've been rejecting patches to the rpc code in the incubator, encouraging folks to work on oslo.messaging | 13:24 |
| dhellmann | I'm starting to get some pushback on that, since projects aren't porting yet | 13:24 |
| dhellmann | this will affect the rootwrap code, too, I suppose, although that sees fewer changes overall | 13:25 |
| ttx | the only project not using it yet is neutron at that point | 13:25 |
| dhellmann | ok, so that's easier then | 13:25 |
| dhellmann | rpc is a tougher port | 13:25 |
| ttx | indeed | 13:25 |
| ttx | I guess that's the issue when what you end up with is significantly different from what you had in | 13:26 |
| dhellmann | anyway, I'm trying to find some sort of balance between carrying multiple copies of that code and porting consumers to the library | 13:26 |
| dhellmann | yeah | 13:26 |
| dhellmann | the underlying implementation isn't so different, but the initialization stuff is | 13:26 |
| ttx | I would cut /some/ slack to the ones who haven't ported yet, but not too much | 13:27 |
| ttx | like critical bugs, security fixes... | 13:27 |
| dhellmann | oh, sure | 13:27 |
| ttx | no features... I suspect the issue is more in the grey area between those two clear-cut groups | 13:27 |
| dhellmann | this was stuff like help strings and randomly choosing the rabbit connection | 13:27 |
| ttx | who is left with migration yet to be done ? | 13:28 |
| dhellmann | well, no one has actually accepted oslo.messaging yet as far as I can tell | 13:28 |
| dhellmann | markmc started with nova, and that is taking a lot longer than expected | 13:28 |
| dhellmann | everyone else seems to be waiting for that as proof that it's worth the effort | 13:28 |
| ttx | hmm. It was "ready" at the end of Grizzly and we deferred it... why is it talking so long in icehouse ? | 13:29 |
| dhellmann | that's an excellent question | 13:29 |
| ttx | (trying to see how much we can stick to our "everyone migrates in icehouse" stance) | 13:29 |
| dhellmann | I don't expect that to happen at this point | 13:30 |
| dhellmann | I'll be happy if nova takes it, and we get everyone else ported in juno | 13:30 |
| dhellmann | but I may be more pessimistic than markmc | 13:30 |
| ttx | dhellmann: me neither, but I'd like to know if we can consider this is the fault of consuming projects prioritization, or the fault of oislo.messaging itself | 13:31 |
| dhellmann | a bit of both | 13:31 |
| dhellmann | you're probably right about the significance of the API changes, although that's pretty much what the incubator is supposed to be for | 13:31 |
| ttx | if the latter, i would certainly be more open to pushing patches to rpc | 13:31 |
| dhellmann | we've been having discussions about the trouble merging oslo into other projects over the past few days | 13:31 |
| dhellmann | we have some work to do on our test suite before the nova folks are really going to be happy to just take patches direcctly | 13:32 |
| dhellmann | but yeah, we may end up having to accept more patches than I would have liked | 13:32 |
| dhellmann | let's see what happens after messaging lands in nova | 13:33 |
| ttx | dhellmann: yeah. as long as those are patches that don't widen the gap with oslo.messaging | 13:33 |
| ttx | and oslo.messaging is partly to blame with the delay... | 13:33 |
| dhellmann | right, I'm at least going to require them to go into oslo.messaging first | 13:33 |
| dhellmann | considering the incubator as our "stable" branch | 13:33 |
| ttx | I was about to write the same thing | 13:34 |
| ttx | you can borrow the same rules | 13:34 |
| dhellmann | yeah, I've been doing that implicitly, but we may have to make it explicit | 13:34 |
| ttx | critical bugs, security fixes, no features, and a few low-impact bugs | 13:34 |
| dhellmann | right | 13:34 |
| ttx | with the rule that it must lands in oslo.messaging first | 13:34 |
| ttx | then when it's adopted by at least one project... lock it down to encourage the others to migrate too | 13:35 |
| ttx | jd__: around? | 13:35 |
| jd__ | ttx: o/ | 13:35 |
| dhellmann | sorry to run over, thanks for helping work that out | 13:35 |
| ttx | dhellmann: hope this helps :) | 13:35 |
| dhellmann | yes, definitely | 13:35 |
| ttx | jd__: did any of those 'implemented' actually land in icehouse-2 ? | 13:36 |
| *** dhellmann is now known as dhellmann_ | 13:36 | |
| ttx | jd__: or did they all land in the last week ? | 13:37 |
| jd__ | let me check | 13:37 |
| *** dhellmann_ is now known as dhellmann | 13:37 | |
| jd__ | nothing in i2 | 13:37 |
| ttx | jd__: OK. Would be great to get sql-unit-tests-on-real-backend landed early in i3, since it's marked essential I would not like it to be caught in a new gate storm | 13:38 |
| jd__ | yeah, we were blocked because of oslo.db | 13:38 |
| jd__ | I need to rebase this patch and see if it works | 13:38 |
| ttx | is it unblocked now ? | 13:38 |
| jd__ | it's being worked on yeah | 13:38 |
| jd__ | I'm reviewing the patches :) | 13:38 |
| ttx | ok | 13:38 |
| ttx | it's a large milestone, so please defer as soon as you're reasonably sure it won't make it | 13:39 |
| ttx | and also merge as soon as you can | 13:39 |
| jd__ | understood | 13:39 |
| jd__ | I've removed a couple already | 13:39 |
| ttx | do you plan to observe the Feb 18 code proposal deadline ? | 13:39 |
| jd__ | we never did so far, not sure what it would buy us | 13:40 |
| jd__ | I need convincing arguments :) | 13:41 |
| ttx | jd__: it generally helps in prioritizing reviews and deferring late stuff | 13:41 |
| ttx | but if you have a good relationship with all proposers, then you don't really need that help | 13:41 |
| jd__ | so far I do indeed | 13:41 |
| ttx | (a feb &8 deadline basically helps you reject code proposed after that with a good reason) | 13:42 |
| jd__ | I never felt we were big enough to impose that so far | 13:42 |
| ttx | 18* | 13:42 |
| ttx | ack | 13:42 |
| ttx | more useful for big projects and/or projects with a lot of "external" contributions | 13:42 |
| jd__ | that's what I thought :) | 13:42 |
| ttx | jd__: we'll see how fast you burn those items next week | 13:42 |
| jd__ | :-/ | 13:43 |
| ttx | anything you'd like to discuss at meeting tonight ? | 13:43 |
| * jd__ crosses fingers | 13:43 | |
| jd__ | nop | 13:43 |
| ttx | (you did 4 in i1+i2 and you have 28 in i-3) | 13:44 |
| ttx | but then you already have 3 done ! | 13:44 |
| ttx | jd__: thx, and see you there | 13:44 |
| ttx | jgriffith: around ? | 13:45 |
| *** markwash has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 13:49 | |
| ttx | jgriffith: ping me when around | 13:51 |
| *** markmcclain has quit IRC | 13:57 | |
| *** markmcclain has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 13:57 | |
| jgriffith | ttx: | 14:02 |
| jgriffith | ttx: ping | 14:02 |
| jgriffith | :) | 14:02 |
| ttx | jgriffith: o/ | 14:02 |
| ttx | https://launchpad.net/cinder/+milestone/icehouse-3 | 14:02 |
| ttx | Were those 2 "implemented" really implemented post icehouse-2 ? | 14:02 |
| jgriffith | loking | 14:03 |
| jgriffith | Yeah | 14:03 |
| jgriffith | Jan 25 | 14:03 |
| ttx | ok | 14:04 |
| jgriffith | that should be just comitted | 14:04 |
| ttx | Could you reveiw those "undefined" and give them a prio (or remove them from milestone) before meeting ? | 14:04 |
| jgriffith | yes | 14:04 |
| ttx | that will let us easily identify additions from now on | 14:04 |
| ttx | (one of them is missing an assignee, fwiw) | 14:05 |
| ttx | otherwise the plan is ambitious but not completely crazy, since 10 of them have code proposed already | 14:05 |
| jgriffith | I have been talking with EMC on these I'll update | 14:05 |
| jgriffith | and prioritize the others | 14:05 |
| ttx | if you convert those early on and use the Feb 18 deadline wisely... you could be in good shape | 14:05 |
| jgriffith | we'll see :) | 14:06 |
| jgriffith | Feb 18'th is just around the corner | 14:06 |
| ttx | nah... 3 full weeks! | 14:06 |
| ttx | and that's just to get code proposed. | 14:06 |
| jgriffith | fair enough | 14:07 |
| ttx | anything you'd like to discuss at meeting today ? | 14:07 |
| jgriffith | don't think I have anything this week | 14:07 |
| ttx | ok. We skip the TC meeting btw | 14:07 |
| jgriffith | Yeah, saw your email | 14:07 |
| jgriffith | works fine for me | 14:08 |
| ttx | jgriffith: ok then, see you later | 14:08 |
| jgriffith | ttx: have a good one | 14:08 |
| * jgriffith goes to wake up and get coffee | 14:08 | |
| dolphm | ttx: o/ | 15:02 |
| ttx | dolphm: hi! | 15:02 |
| dolphm | give me a couple minutes - changing venues | 15:03 |
| ttx | sure. Will be looking @ https://launchpad.net/keystone/+milestone/icehouse-3 | 15:03 |
| dolphm | o/ | 15:06 |
| ttx | Looking at the Implemented one to check if they were not actually merged in i2 | 15:06 |
| ttx | dolphm: looks like they weren't | 15:07 |
| ttx | https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/identity-providers seems to have a few more open changes though | 15:07 |
| ttx | like https://review.openstack.org/#/c/69244/ ? | 15:07 |
| dolphm | hmm, those should maybe be referencing saml-id | 15:08 |
| ttx | ok, bad reference then | 15:08 |
| dolphm | or bugs, it looks like | 15:08 |
| ttx | ephemeral-pki-tokens: do you know when work will be started on this one ? | 15:08 |
| dolphm | we're waiting on revocation-events for that one | 15:09 |
| dolphm | but morganfainberg most likely | 15:09 |
| dolphm | it'll also be a very small effort (new config option to disable an existing behavior) | 15:09 |
| dolphm | and some docs | 15:10 |
| ttx | no-check-id is marked blocked but https://review.openstack.org/#/c/68453/ merged... (was marked as one of the unblockers) | 15:10 |
| ttx | what is it blocking on now ? | 15:10 |
| dolphm | ooh, one sec | 15:11 |
| dolphm | yay, that's no longer blocked | 15:11 |
| ttx | ok, will let you fix it | 15:11 |
| ttx | dolphm: ok, that's all I had -- anything you'd like to discuss at meeting ? | 15:12 |
| dolphm | that's the only one i wanted to raise | 15:12 |
| ttx | dolphm: cool then, see you there | 15:12 |
| dolphm | that's now a legitimate "recheck no bug" on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/54647/ ... but that's been disabled right? | 15:12 |
| ttx | dolphm: no, recheck no bug shall still be available | 15:13 |
| ttx | at least that's what I use to refresh old bug checks | 15:13 |
| ttx | russellb: around ? | 15:13 |
| russellb | o/ | 15:13 |
| russellb | http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-January/025675.html | 15:14 |
| ttx | https://launchpad.net/nova/+milestone/icehouse-3 | 15:14 |
| dolphm | ttx: cool, thanks! | 15:14 |
| ttx | hah. 153 | 15:14 |
| russellb | yeah :) | 15:14 |
| russellb | above post is my current plan to trim that with a series of deadlines | 15:14 |
| * ttx reads | 15:14 | |
| russellb | i've emailed nova-drivers directly as well, asking for help in the next week in advance of deadline #1 | 15:14 |
| ttx | ok, sounds good | 15:15 |
| russellb | i've also told nova-drivers to start bumping priority on key blueprints | 15:15 |
| russellb | and abandon the -core sponsor thing for now | 15:15 |
| ttx | forklift-scheduler-breakout has no assignee | 15:16 |
| russellb | to try to identify the key ones out of the list | 15:16 |
| russellb | ah, i'm going to go ahead and defer that | 15:16 |
| russellb | plan is to aim to have it ready for early juno right now | 15:16 |
| russellb | lots of critical unassigned bugs ... all gate things, mostly actually being worked, just not assigned to a specific person | 15:17 |
| ttx | Is recover-stuck-state completed with the merging of https://review.openstack.org/#/c/55660/ ? | 15:18 |
| russellb | nope | 15:18 |
| russellb | still some patches on there not merged | 15:18 |
| ttx | ok | 15:18 |
| russellb | the last 2 on the list | 15:19 |
| russellb | a different topic, under a bug' | 15:19 |
| ttx | OK, we shall see better in one week | 15:19 |
| russellb | yeah | 15:20 |
| russellb | all the unprioritized ones should disappear (or be prioritized) | 15:20 |
| russellb | that's a big chunk | 15:20 |
| ttx | I would still advise to merge as much as you can of those "needs code review" while the gate is fluid | 15:20 |
| * russellb nods | 15:20 | |
| russellb | i haven't sent out any nagging nova-core "please do more reviews" emails this cycle | 15:21 |
| russellb | i don't have an easy way to do that anymore :( | 15:21 |
| russellb | used to use launchpad for that | 15:21 |
| ttx | hah | 15:21 |
| russellb | i did that last cycle, it helps, heh | 15:21 |
| ttx | the meeting today has a "Code proposal deadline" topic, based on your email | 15:22 |
| russellb | great, thanks | 15:22 |
| russellb | was going to ask for that to be added | 15:22 |
| russellb | i don't think i have anything else for today's meeting ... | 15:22 |
| ttx | nope. I still owe you some velocity analysis | 15:23 |
| ttx | probably will have time to do it for next meeting | 15:23 |
| russellb | we could do a weekly "state of the gate" ... much better now obviously | 15:23 |
| russellb | OK cool, i've been meaning to look at it some more too | 15:23 |
| russellb | we're obviously way down in nova in terms of blueprints | 15:23 |
| russellb | been meaning to look at patch velocity | 15:23 |
| russellb | also heads up ... going to start a nova-network / neutron thread on openstack-dev this week, perhaps today | 15:24 |
| ttx | also in your case adding one more week wouldn't have made a lot more blueprints completed | 15:24 |
| russellb | yeah, personally i've still be focusing on infra/qa/gate stuff | 15:24 |
| ttx | russellb: yep, and it showed. | 15:24 |
| ttx | anyway, see you at meeting today. No TC meeting btw | 15:24 |
| russellb | sounds good, thanks! | 15:25 |
| russellb | and sorry for the messy roadmap | 15:25 |
| ttx | np | 15:26 |
| ttx | david-lyle_: ping me when around | 15:26 |
| russellb | i think review process / using statuses helped make it a little more organized, but still room for improvement | 15:28 |
| *** david-lyle has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 15:41 | |
| david-lyle | ttx: apologies, I had a snowy commute | 15:41 |
| ttx | david-lyle: sorry just a sec | 15:43 |
| ttx | david-lyle: hi! | 15:45 |
| david-lyle | ttx: hello | 15:45 |
| ttx | https://launchpad.net/horizon/+milestone/icehouse-3 | 15:45 |
| ttx | You have 4 blueprints implemented in there -- were they all merged post icehouse-2 ? | 15:46 |
| ttx | (i.e. in the last 7 days ?) | 15:46 |
| david-lyle | ttx: yes, hung up in gate | 15:46 |
| david-lyle | when milestone was cut | 15:46 |
| ttx | ok | 15:46 |
| david-lyle | Our list is too big, starting to clean it up, still a ways to go | 15:46 |
| ttx | datatable-row-groups is marked deferred, does that mean it should be moved out of icehouse- 3 ? Or that it was deferred to i3 ? | 15:47 |
| david-lyle | I need to ask the developer. I think he just got focused on something else | 15:47 |
| david-lyle | that may move out of icehouse, but I will change the status when I understand what he meant | 15:47 |
| ttx | ok | 15:48 |
| ttx | yeah, so the idea will be to refine as you go. When you think it won't make it, defer | 15:48 |
| david-lyle | sure | 15:49 |
| ttx | RBAC support for network is High / Not started, still feelin confident on that one ? | 15:49 |
| david-lyle | yes, that will be in | 15:49 |
| ttx | ok. django-angular-integration needs an assignee, too | 15:49 |
| david-lyle | may be a group effort, but we need it | 15:49 |
| david-lyle | I think the drafter is the assignee, saw that last night, going to check in the Horizon meeting today | 15:50 |
| ttx | ok. Otherwise looks good | 15:51 |
| ttx | anything you'd like to discuss at meeting later today ? | 15:51 |
| david-lyle | no, I have a process question though | 15:51 |
| david-lyle | how do I propose some UX folks for a Horizon ATC exception? | 15:51 |
| david-lyle | We have 3 people who have contributed a lot to the icehouse release from a design perspective | 15:52 |
| ttx | the easiest would be to propose a patch to http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/governance/tree/reference/extra-atcs | 15:52 |
| ttx | then it will automatically get onto the TC radar | 15:52 |
| david-lyle | ok, two are already on there, should I update their experation date? | 15:53 |
| david-lyle | expiration | 15:53 |
| david-lyle | that looks better | 15:53 |
| ttx | no, they will renew in September | 15:53 |
| ttx | just add new ones at the bottom with expiration in February 2015 | 15:54 |
| david-lyle | ok, sounds good. I'll try to get that posted today | 15:54 |
| ttx | the commit message can contain justification | 15:54 |
| david-lyle | sure | 15:54 |
| ttx | ok, see you there | 15:54 |
| david-lyle | ok, thanks | 15:54 |
| notmyname | ttx: can we go ahead with a swift update | 16:05 |
| notmyname | ? | 16:05 |
| ttx | on a call right now | 16:05 |
| notmyname | kk | 16:05 |
| * notmyname will be back later, then | 16:06 | |
| ttx | ack | 16:07 |
| *** SergeyLukjanov is now known as SergeyLukjanov_ | 16:09 | |
| ttx | notmyname: available now if you are | 16:25 |
| notmyname | ttx: here | 16:26 |
| ttx | notmyname: hi! | 16:26 |
| ttx | https://launchpad.net/swift/+milestone/1.12.0 | 16:26 |
| notmyname | good morning afternoon and goodnight | 16:26 |
| ttx | had a question about https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1262341 | 16:26 |
| ttx | it's targeted to 1.12.0 | 16:27 |
| ttx | but not fixed yet ? | 16:27 |
| notmyname | it's in https://github.com/openstack/swift/commit/ace2aa33b19b3ff5abfb3f624414f422f8723b41 | 16:28 |
| notmyname | mark as done | 16:28 |
| ttx | ok | 16:28 |
| notmyname | 1.12.0 should be good to go. I'll send my announcement email as soon as you do the tagging | 16:28 |
| ttx | ok, let me do that now | 16:28 |
| notmyname | thanks | 16:29 |
| notmyname | (we'll I'll send out the announce email in a couple of hours. I've got to drive to San Jose shortly. I'll do it from a coffee shop there.) | 16:29 |
| ttx | waiting for https://jenkins01.openstack.org/job/swift-tarball/5/ to complete | 16:30 |
| notmyname | as to future plans, here's what I've been thinking... | 16:30 |
| notmyname | the biggest push for the rest of icehouse is getting multi-ring support (ie replicated storage policies) into swift. we've got about 9 weeks until the Icehouse RC | 16:31 |
| ttx | All set at https://launchpad.net/swift/icehouse/1.12.0 | 16:31 |
| notmyname | I'll expect the last pieces to be written and merged to the feature/ec branch in the next ~3 weeks, then about 3 weeks to get feature/ec merged into master, then ~3 weeks again for sussing out anything and getting the RC | 16:32 |
| notmyname | ttx: thanks, I'll do the release email this morning | 16:32 |
| ttx | notmyname: sounds like good timing | 16:32 |
| notmyname | as to swift releases, we may have a 1.13 late feb and then a 1.14 as the RC/final (numbers to be determined later) | 16:33 |
| notmyname | but we'll have at least one more | 16:33 |
| notmyname | mostly that depends on what lands before the storage policy work is merged | 16:33 |
| ttx | ok | 16:33 |
| ttx | do you want me to create a placeholder for 1.13.0 ? Or we'll do that later ? | 16:33 |
| notmyname | if there is a bunch (eg the account ACLs that will land next week), then we may do a final pre-storage policy release before the icehouse rc | 16:34 |
| ttx | (or will you just use next-icehouse for the time being ?) | 16:34 |
| notmyname | go ahead. we'll need it anyway, and having the placeholder allows using the -next for a potential N+2 release | 16:35 |
| *** hub_cap has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 16:35 | |
| ttx | ok, will do | 16:35 |
| ttx | your plan sounds good to me | 16:35 |
| notmyname | and FYI, I blogged about the general status yesterday at https://swiftstack.com/blog/2014/01/27/openstack-swift-storage-policies/ | 16:35 |
| ttx | I read that one. anything you'd like to discuss at meeting today ? | 16:36 |
| ttx | i'll cover last week postmortem and gate status already | 16:36 |
| notmyname | I'm somewhat interested in the common logging topic, but I'll have to catch up on the logs. I'll be giving a talk today during the meeting time | 16:36 |
| notmyname | I'm also interested in progress being made on reducing the overlapping tests in the gate | 16:37 |
| notmyname | I saw that proposed, but it hasn't been implemented yet | 16:37 |
| notmyname | (proposed on the mailing list) | 16:37 |
| ttx | ok, will raise it during atht segment | 16:37 |
| ttx | have a good drive | 16:37 |
| notmyname | anything else from your side? | 16:38 |
| ttx | notmyname: nope, I'm good | 16:38 |
| notmyname | me too | 16:38 |
| notmyname | thanks | 16:38 |
| ttx | talk to you later. | 16:38 |
| ttx | markwash: ready whenever you are | 16:39 |
| markwash | ttx: hi! I'm at the glance summit atm | 16:39 |
| markwash | so maybe extra-lightweight today? | 16:39 |
| ttx | ok, let me see if I need you for anything | 16:40 |
| ttx | markwash: nothing urgent. Talk to you next week | 16:40 |
| markwash | ttx <3 | 16:40 |
| markwash | ttx: go storyboard! | 16:40 |
| ttx | yay! | 16:41 |
| ttx | hub_cap: ready whenever you are. | 16:41 |
| hub_cap | gogogogo | 16:47 |
| hub_cap | just so u know, bp's are clean, amcrn did it yest | 16:47 |
| ttx | https://launchpad.net/trove/+milestone/icehouse-3 | 16:47 |
| hub_cap | ive tol the guys to focus on reviews in i3 and the rest in gerrit can go to hell for now :) | 16:47 |
| ttx | Looks all good ansd reasonable to me | 16:47 |
| hub_cap | yea im not sure about the oslo-rpc one, i might have to take it | 16:48 |
| ttx | hub_cap: was wondering if redis support should not be considered to have landed in i2 ? | 16:48 |
| hub_cap | i dont think flaper (sp?) was workign on that | 16:48 |
| hub_cap | im not sure what u mean ttx.. u mean its saying impld in 3 but shoudlve been 2 ? | 16:49 |
| ttx | most patches I tracked it down to a series opf patches that were merged before we cut i2 | 16:49 |
| ttx | err | 16:49 |
| ttx | most patches I tracked it down to were merged before we cut i2 | 16:49 |
| hub_cap | ok let me look at the i2 (its in gh right?) | 16:49 |
| ttx | yes | 16:49 |
| hub_cap | .1.b2? | 16:50 |
| ttx | hmm https://review.openstack.org/#/c/53481/ landed on Jan 23 | 16:50 |
| ttx | so probably after i2 | 16:50 |
| ttx | yes b2 would be the tag | 16:50 |
| hub_cap | i was pretty sure it was after | 16:50 |
| ttx | ok, ignore me | 16:50 |
| hub_cap | ok but then this conversation will be quite one sided | 16:51 |
| * hub_cap waits for the rimshot | 16:51 | |
| ttx | Your plan looks good, just a few dependency issues | 16:51 |
| ttx | cassandra-db-support (Low, dmakogon, icehouse-3) depends on trove-refactoring-for-better-pluggability (Undefined, dukhlov, ongoing) | 16:51 |
| ttx | single-instance-mongodb-ga (Low, ikhudoshyn, icehouse-3) depends on base-mongodb-image (Medium, ikhudoshyn, No milestone) | 16:51 |
| ttx | If those are true dependencies you should consider moving them to i3 | 16:52 |
| hub_cap | lol what | 16:52 |
| hub_cap | ill clean those 2 bp's up | 16:52 |
| ttx | hmm, igore that last one, the dependent BP is actually in trove-integration | 16:52 |
| ttx | but the first one remains | 16:52 |
| ttx | ok, aotherwise looks all fine and dandy | 16:53 |
| ttx | anything you wanted to discuss at meeting later ? | 16:53 |
| hub_cap | ok great. yea i think ill close the better-plugability bp | 16:53 |
| hub_cap | ummmm... man i always thin of stuff thru the wk and randomly forget | 16:53 |
| ttx | Oh. And should https://bugs.launchpad.net/trove/+bug/1252897 be targeted to i3 ? | 16:53 |
| hub_cap | so as of now no | 16:53 |
| ttx | it's critical, but targeted to "next" | 16:54 |
| hub_cap | naw lets take off critical | 16:54 |
| ttx | ok, that works for me | 16:54 |
| hub_cap | its just a bug | 16:54 |
| ttx | ok then, talk to you later at meeting | 16:54 |
| hub_cap | if i remember anythign for the meeting ill hit u up | 16:54 |
| hub_cap | oh i do have a q | 16:55 |
| hub_cap | how si the bp/bug replacment comin | 16:55 |
| ttx | sprinting on Thu/Fri to move on | 16:55 |
| hub_cap | ok, so is this somethign we could be using in ~3mo? | 16:58 |
| ttx | hub_cap: some will | 17:00 |
| ttx | We'll see how fast it goes | 17:00 |
| hub_cap | :) | 17:01 |
| hub_cap | id be happy to help guinea pig it since trove still has less usage than other projects :) | 17:01 |
| hub_cap | ok welp have a good few hrs. | 17:02 |
| *** SergeyLukjanov_ is now known as SergeyLukjanov | 17:36 | |
| *** sdague has quit IRC | 18:51 | |
| *** sdague has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 18:56 | |
| *** dolphm is now known as dolphm_afk | 19:18 | |
| ttx | stevebaker: ping me when around | 19:22 |
| ttx | stevebaker: still not around ? | 19:38 |
| *** david-lyle has quit IRC | 19:42 | |
| stevebaker | ttx: sorry, here now | 19:44 |
| ttx | stevebaker: hi! quick run | 19:44 |
| ttx | https://launchpad.net/heat/+milestone/icehouse-3 | 19:44 |
| ttx | Doesn't look too bad, just way too many things | 19:45 |
| stevebaker | yeah | 19:45 |
| ttx | was adopt-stack merged post-i2 ? | 19:45 |
| ttx | hmm, the answer is yes | 19:45 |
| stevebaker | yeah | 19:46 |
| ttx | so you can refine as you go... but aggressively defer as soon as you know it won't be ready | 19:46 |
| stevebaker | I expect a lot of those bugs will be deferred to post i-3 | 19:46 |
| ttx | 3 BP are missing an assignee, could be good candidates for early deferral :) | 19:46 |
| ttx | https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/i18n-messages needs to be triaged | 19:46 |
| stevebaker | puppet and chef should be small | 19:46 |
| ttx | and then you have a few dep issues: | 19:46 |
| ttx | update-failure-recovery (High, zaneb, icehouse-3) depends on resource-template-api (Undefined, No assignee, No milestone) | 19:47 |
| ttx | and also on retry-failed-update (Low, clint-fewbar, icehouse-3) | 19:47 |
| ttx | x-auth-trust (Low, shardy, icehouse-3) depends on trusts-chained-delegation (Undefined, No assignee, No milestone) | 19:47 |
| stevebaker | I think resource-template-api is new | 19:47 |
| stevebaker | I'll update it | 19:47 |
| ttx | so add milestone adn adjust priority accordingly | 19:47 |
| stevebaker | ok | 19:48 |
| stevebaker | I'll go through and fix those before the meeting | 19:48 |
| ttx | that's all I had | 19:48 |
| ttx | anythign you'd like to discuss in 72 min ? | 19:48 |
| stevebaker | I can't think of anything | 19:49 |
| ttx | ok then, see you there :) | 19:49 |
| stevebaker | ok, later | 19:49 |
| *** hub_cap has left #openstack-relmgr-office | 20:32 | |
| *** markwash has quit IRC | 21:02 | |
| *** dolphm_afk is now known as dolphm | 21:28 | |
| *** SergeyLukjanov is now known as SergeyLukjanov_ | 21:59 | |
| *** mattoliverau has quit IRC | 22:52 | |
| *** mattoliverau has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 23:01 | |
| *** openstack has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 23:03 | |
| *** frankbutt has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 23:59 | |
| *** frankbutt has left #openstack-relmgr-office | 23:59 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!