| opendevreview | Hervé Beraud proposed openstack/releases master: oslo.utils 9.0.0 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/940853 | 08:30 |
|---|---|---|
| opendevreview | Hervé Beraud proposed openstack/releases master: oslo.rootwrap 7.5.0 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/940852 | 08:32 |
| ttx | o/ | 14:00 |
| ttx | #startmeeting releaseteam | 14:00 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting started Fri Feb 7 14:00:57 2025 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is ttx. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 14:00 |
| opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 14:00 |
| opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'releaseteam' | 14:00 |
| elodilles | o/ | 14:01 |
| ttx | Ping list: release-team armstrong | 14:01 |
| ttx | Our agenda for today lives at: | 14:01 |
| ttx | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/epoxy-relmgt-tracking#L239 | 14:01 |
| ttx | #topic Review task completion | 14:02 |
| ttx | - Make sure the next development series name has been added to the data/series_status.yaml file. (elod) | 14:02 |
| elodilles | actually i relied on the schedule patch for this: | 14:02 |
| elodilles | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/939528 | 14:02 |
| elodilles | if no objection then i'm +2+W this now ^^^ | 14:03 |
| ttx | Works for me | 14:03 |
| elodilles | +2+W'd | 14:03 |
| ttx | - Reach out to Horizon team and ask if they want to go back to cycle-with-rc, given that Horizon has not done an intermediary release yet (elod) | 14:04 |
| elodilles | (elod) i've pinged the team and they seem to be open for the change to cycle-with-rc, but they will discuss this at their weekly meeting | 14:04 |
| ttx | ok | 14:04 |
| elodilles | the meeting will happen next Wednesday if i'm not mistaken | 14:04 |
| ttx | next up the post-freezer return actions... https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/938780 got merged alright | 14:05 |
| elodilles | +1 | 14:05 |
| elodilles | should i merge this? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/940768 | 14:05 |
| ttx | and I proposed the readdition of Freezer onto theopenstack-map at https://review.opendev.org/c/openinfra/openstack-map/+/940724 | 14:05 |
| ttx | A +1 there would give me enough to approve it ^ | 14:06 |
| ttx | sure | 14:06 |
| fungi | yeah, the tc published a resolution about the exception too | 14:06 |
| ttx | - Doublecheck that Monasca was removed from governance, and that a final decision on Freezer was reached (both do not have deliverables in epoxy but are still listed in governance) (ttx) | 14:06 |
| ttx | So.. it looks like we should be tracking more closely the list of inactive projects at: | 14:07 |
| ttx | https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/emerging-technology-and-inactive-projects.html | 14:07 |
| fungi | #link https://governance.openstack.org/tc/resolutions/20250122-freezer-late-2025-1-release.html | 14:07 |
| frickler | late o/ | 14:07 |
| ttx | A project can be active in governance projects.yaml but "inactive" in that list | 14:08 |
| ttx | so when we do the governance consistency check we should probably include that | 14:08 |
| ttx | Not really machine-readable, but I guess we could parse it | 14:08 |
| ttx | meanwhile I'll add a note to the PROCESS,rst file | 14:09 |
| fungi | or ask the tc to track it in projects.yaml instead | 14:09 |
| ttx | to doublecheck the results against the inactive list | 14:09 |
| ttx | fungi: that would even be better | 14:09 |
| fungi | building the list to inject into the emerging and inactive projects list from flags in projects.yaml is probably less work tan building a bespoke parser | 14:10 |
| fungi | i'll make a note to bring it up with them | 14:10 |
| ttx | thanks! | 14:11 |
| fungi | i have some thing else to add to their meeting agenda anyway | 14:11 |
| ttx | - Send the weekly email content (ttx) | 14:11 |
| ttx | that will be done shortly | 14:11 |
| ttx | #topic Assign R-7 week tasks | 14:12 |
| ttx | fungi: maybe you can take the first two tasks since they involve you or the TC? | 14:12 |
| ttx | Notify the Infrastructure team to generate an artifact signing key | 14:13 |
| ttx | Check with the Technical Committee to make sure Python runtimes have been determined for the next development cycle | 14:13 |
| fungi | yeah, i'll take the first two | 14:13 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Proposed 2025.2 Flamingo release schedule https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/939528 | 14:13 |
| ttx | woohoo! no task | 14:13 |
| ttx | #topic Review weekly countdown email | 14:14 |
| ttx | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/relmgmt-weekly-emails | 14:14 |
| ttx | Please doublecheck my interpretation of deadlines being sometimes on Thursday sometimes on Friday | 14:14 |
| ttx | I used Thursday for most, except RC1 and final RC weeks | 14:15 |
| ttx | IIRC that is how we handled them lately | 14:15 |
| frickler | lgtm | 14:17 |
| ttx | elodilles: ? | 14:18 |
| elodilles | sorry | 14:18 |
| elodilles | i wonder whether final rc deadline is correct | 14:19 |
| elodilles | March 28 is Friday | 14:19 |
| elodilles | but probably that is what we had in recent cycles, right? | 14:20 |
| ttx | right, I considered that a week | 14:20 |
| ttx | I used Thursday for most, except RC1 and final RC weeks | 14:20 |
| ttx | in practice that does not change much what ends up happening | 14:20 |
| elodilles | ACK, let's be it then | 14:21 |
| ttx | alright will send soon | 14:21 |
| elodilles | LGTM | 14:21 |
| ttx | #topic Open Discussion | 14:21 |
| ttx | anything to discuss? | 14:21 |
| elodilles | nothing from my side | 14:22 |
| * ttx gives a quick look at the review backlog | 14:23 | |
| ttx | Maybe we should clean up some 2021-2023 reviews that never panned out | 14:24 |
| ttx | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/855663 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/785008 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/883603 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/reno/+/904049 | 14:24 |
| opendevreview | Rodolfo Alonso proposed openstack/releases master: Release neutron-lib 3.18.1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/940972 | 14:25 |
| ttx | or maybe just ask on them if this is still wanted | 14:26 |
| ttx | I guess we could approve https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/reno/+/904049 | 14:28 |
| elodilles | xmlrpc is a good question. if it is deprecated and will disappear some time, then it's better to move to the new way of things. but i don't have the context now | 14:28 |
| ttx | On https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/883603 I can ask if that's still a current request | 14:29 |
| ttx | elodilles: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/855663 looks old :) | 14:29 |
| elodilles | (i've moved my patch to WIP so it won't appear on the list anymore i guess ) | 14:29 |
| elodilles | that one o:) | 14:29 |
| hberaud[m] | o/ | 14:30 |
| elodilles | hi hberaud[m] o/ | 14:30 |
| ttx | The WIP one still appears on my dashboard... I guess I'm in the "attention set"?? | 14:31 |
| ttx | and.. now it's gone | 14:32 |
| elodilles | hmmm, interesting, in the past it disappeared from the dashboard. anyway, i abandoned it (will restore if i ever get there o:)) | 14:32 |
| ttx | frickler: you were the one soft-objecting to https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/reno/+/904049 -- let me know if it looks good for you | 14:34 |
| ttx | hberaud: should we abandon https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/785008 ? | 14:36 |
| hberaud[m] | looks | 14:36 |
| ttx | or at least mark it WIP? | 14:36 |
| hberaud[m] | well, I don't think I'll work on this one anymore | 14:37 |
| hberaud[m] | and it was created 5 years ago so, let's abandon it | 14:37 |
| ttx | ack I'll let you do the honors | 14:38 |
| hberaud[m] | and pypa said that that's not the right approache if remember correctly | 14:38 |
| ttx | Anything else to discuss? | 14:38 |
| hberaud[m] | yes | 14:38 |
| hberaud[m] | Are we in the open discussion time? | 14:39 |
| elodilles | yepp, we are :) | 14:39 |
| hberaud[m] | ok | 14:39 |
| hberaud[m] | thanks | 14:39 |
| hberaud[m] | then | 14:39 |
| hberaud[m] | I wanted to present you Kacper (kacperrh) | 14:39 |
| hberaud[m] | Kacper is my teammate downstream, and he show interest in release managerment | 14:40 |
| elodilles | good to hear that :) | 14:40 |
| kacperrh[m] | Hey guys, it's nice to meet you all. | 14:40 |
| elodilles | welcome kacperrh[m] o/ | 14:40 |
| ttx | A sane interest! | 14:40 |
| fungi | welcome kacperrh[m] ! | 14:40 |
| hberaud[m] | so I proposed to mentor him on this topic, this way we will have reinforcement for the release team | 14:41 |
| ttx | And a great way to get a horizontal view on a complex project like OpenStack. Welcome kacperrh ! | 14:41 |
| ttx | soudns great! Thanks hberaud | 14:41 |
| hberaud[m] | So please join to help Kacper growing his skills and his knowledge about OpenStack | 14:41 |
| ttx | kacperrh: don't hesitate to ask the rest of us questions! | 14:42 |
| elodilles | sure thing! kacperrh[m] feel free to ask questions, indeed! | 14:42 |
| hberaud[m] | I think I'll show him first the oslo release liaison aspects | 14:42 |
| elodilles | cool! thanks hberaud[m] in advance o/ | 14:43 |
| hberaud[m] | but we also plan to study the relmgt team side | 14:43 |
| elodilles | +1 | 14:43 |
| hberaud[m] | that's all for me | 14:43 |
| ttx | alright! | 14:45 |
| ttx | this concludes our meeting | 14:45 |
| ttx | Thanks everyone for joining | 14:46 |
| ttx | #endmeeting | 14:46 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting ended Fri Feb 7 14:46:05 2025 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 14:46 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/releaseteam/2025/releaseteam.2025-02-07-14.00.html | 14:46 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/releaseteam/2025/releaseteam.2025-02-07-14.00.txt | 14:46 |
| opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/releaseteam/2025/releaseteam.2025-02-07-14.00.log.html | 14:46 |
| elodilles | thanks o/ | 14:46 |
| hberaud[m] | Thanks ttx | 14:46 |
| kacperrh[m] | Thanks. | 14:46 |
| opendevreview | Thierry Carrez proposed openstack/releases master: Mention list of inactive projects in process doc https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/940974 | 14:55 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!