| noonedeadpunk | I was hoping to move freezer to active state this cycle, though we're looking into some bigger refactoring right now | 08:33 |
|---|---|---|
| noonedeadpunk | but ci at least should be healthy at current state | 08:33 |
| *** elodilles_pto is now known as elodilles | 08:34 | |
| elodilles | happy new year everyone o/ (to all who celebrates it around this time o:)) | 08:35 |
| opendevreview | Hervé Beraud proposed openstack/releases master: release oslo.messaging 16.0.0 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/938116 | 08:58 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [trove-tempest-plugin] Tag 2023.1-last https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/933950 | 10:26 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [keystone-tempest-plugin] Tag 2023.1-last https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/933957 | 11:31 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [cinder-tempest-plugin] Tag 2023.1-last https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/933951 | 11:31 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [vitrage-tempest-plugin] Tag 2023.1-last https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/933961 | 11:31 |
| noonedeadpunk | though, I think TC decision should go first for marking project as active again? I don't think I can just go on and propose client release right away? | 11:32 |
| *** marios_ is now known as marios | 12:47 | |
| gtema | wrt codegenerator and openapi: both are definitely independent and technically both are intended as "master-only" since the code is bound (at least for now) to the master branches of services and not to the releases. Is there a way to assign projects to independent release model without cutting release? | 13:01 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [magnum-tempest-plugin] Tag 2023.1-last https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/933946 | 13:51 |
| *** sfinucan is now known as stephenfin | 14:06 | |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Puppet OpenStack: Transition yoga to EOL https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/937724 | 15:19 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [mistral-tempest-plugin] Tag 2023.1-last https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/933960 | 15:52 |
| opendevreview | Jeremy Stanley proposed openstack/releases master: Release PBR 6.1.1.0b1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/938505 | 16:48 |
| fungi | out of curiosity, why does the release team prohibit pre-releases for independent model deliverables? anyone happen to remember? | 17:28 |
| fungi | the pbr maintainers are interested in doing pre-release testing as a precaution before tagging a new release, since it's nearly impossible for projects to exercise unreleased pbr versions | 17:29 |
| frickler | "Release tags for deliverables using this tag are managed without oversight from the Release Management team." https://releases.openstack.org/reference/release_models.html#independent | 17:35 |
| frickler | to me that sounds like we should not prohibit beta releases, either. but then I don't know much about the history of this, either | 17:36 |
| frickler | release-team: ^^ maybe one of you has more context? | 17:37 |
| fungi | i'll see if i can dig up any rationale from the commit that added the check | 17:41 |
| opendevreview | Jeremy Stanley proposed openstack/releases master: Release PBR 6.1.1.0b1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/938505 | 17:51 |
| opendevreview | Jeremy Stanley proposed openstack/releases master: Allow pre-releases for independent deliverables https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/938510 | 17:51 |
| fungi | seems like it's been prohibited for as long as that check has existed, and i found no discussion indicating that it was forbidden for a specific reason | 17:51 |
| fungi | i guess we can debate it in the change | 17:51 |
| gmann | noonedeadpunk: you can still propose the releases even project is in inactive state and that is a good data for TC to take decision to make project active again. As per inactive projects process, release team will not release it but project team can fix CI and propose the release. | 18:28 |
| opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/releases master: [ironic-tempest-plugin] Tag 2023.1-last https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/933964 | 18:33 |
| gmann | elodilles: ^^ fixed the hash for this release. rpittau: ^^ please check | 18:35 |
| opendevreview | Vladimir Kozhukalov proposed openstack/releases master: OpenStack-Helm 2024.2.0 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/938231 | 23:45 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!